In 2001 and 2002, Michael Patrick Murrayand five other people, all of whom had brain tumors located beneath where they had held their cell phones, sued the telecommunications industry for damages. In 2010 and 2011, seven more brain cancer victims joined the case as additional plaintiffs.

The defendants represent most of the American telecommunications industry: Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile, Bell South, Bell Atlantic, Motorola, Qualcomm, Samsung, SONY, Sanyo, Nokia, the CTIA, the FCC, and dozens of other telecom companies.

Through extensive maneuvering and delaying tactics by the defendants, this important case has bounced back and forth from court to court for twenty years like a ping pong ball. It went from D.C. Superior Court, to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, to U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, back to D.C. Superior Court, up to the D.C. Court of Appeals, back to D.C. Superior Court, back up to the D.C. Court of Appeals, and back to D.C. Superior Court.

This summer, despite the fact that many of the plaintiffs are no longer alive, Murray v. Motorolawill finally go to trial. Expert witness are scheduled to testify before Judge Alfred S. Irving from July 12-23, 2021. If the judge rules that the witnesses are qualified, then they will later testify before a jury.

The witnesses for the plaintiffs include: 

  • Dr. Igor Belyaev, Head Research Scientist at the Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Science
  • Dr. Michael Kundi, professor at the Medical University of Vienna and former head of its Institute of Environmental Health
  • Dr. Abraham Liboff, professor emeritus of physics at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan
  • Dr. Wilhelm Mosgoeller, associate professor at the Medical University of Vienna’s Institute of Cancer Research
  • Dr. Dimitris Panagopoulos, founder of the Radiation Biophysics Laboratory at the University of Athens
  • Dr. Laura Plunkett, toxicologist and principal consultant at Integrative Biostrategies in Houston, Texas
  • Dr. Christopher Portier, Senior Advisor to the World Health Organization’s Environmental Program and former Director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control

Dr. Portier’s report was submitted to the court on March 1, 2021. BEGINNING THE HEALING
  The Murray case, which has been simmering on the back burner, is confronting us with a question that all the judges, and the courts, and the telecommunications companies, and the public, have managed to avoid for two decades. But the testimony we will hear in July from the world’s most prominent experts will focus directly on it: what are the cell phones in our hands doing to our bodies and to the world around us?

Has our attention on cell towers diverted attention away from where it needs to be?

There are about 14 billion mobile devicesin the world, each emitting up to 2 watts of microwave radiation, for a combined emitting power of about 28 billion watts.

Outside of China, there are about 3 million 4G cell towers in the world, each emitting up to a few hundred watts of microwave radiation, for a combined emitting power of perhaps 1 billion watts. Within China, there are 6 million more 4G towers, for an additional 1 to 2 billion watts.

Where is most of the radiation coming from, cell phones or cell towers? Which are more responsible for killing birds and bees, cell phones or cell towers? When you measure the radiation levels where you live, what are you mostly measuring, the many phones around you or the fewer towers? It depends on where you live.

The biggest difference between phones and towers is that phones radiate equally in all directions, whereas towers focus most of their radiation along the ground. This can multiply the effective power of a cell tower on the ground by a factor of 30 or more. But even that is not enough to raise the average radiation levels on most of the earth from all the cell towers beyond the average radiation levels from all the cell phones. And high in the air, above the main beams of cell towers, birds and insects can receive more radiation from phones than from towers.

Cell phones, as we will hear in July, damage DNA, alter the structure of proteins, affect cell growth, damage sperm, cause spontaneous abortions, interfere with memory and learning, damage the blood-brain barrier, alter brain waves, disturb sleep, affect the immune system, alter metabolism, interfere with development, damage tissues and organs, and cause cancer. What, then, are all the cell phones doing to our world?

But the antennas on towers are so much bigger than phones, you may say. Size has nothing to do with it. The extra size mostly allows the tower to focus its beam along the ground instead of up in the air.

But towers are always on, you may say, and phones aren’t. Untrue. If all the phones were ever off, a tower would only emit enough power to let the phones know that it is there. And even when you think your phone is turned completely off, the resonant circuits within it are still connected to the battery and are still affecting the space around them.

But your phone only emits one frequency, you may say, while the tower emits hundreds. Yes, but the tower only emits hundreds of frequencies when hundreds of phones are communicating with it. The combined radiation and combined number of frequencies are still about the same from all the phones as from all the towers.

What is making people more sick, and doing more damage to the earth? The phones? Or the towers?

We have all had the experience that the higher in elevation we are, the more radiation we feel. This is partially because there are cell towers on the tops of hills and mountains. But it is also due to radio towers and radar stations, which do not focus their energy along the ground. Weather radars. Air traffic control radars. Civil defense radars. They are all proliferating and increasing in power and sophistication, and they are all helping to destroy the Earth. Cell towers are contributing too, but it is a mistake to blame the cell towers while you are holding a cell phone in your hand, or are keeping one in your home.

Just 25 years ago, the average human being did no harm to other species, or other humans, when taking a walk. Today, every human being is a source of radiation wherever he or she goes.

I have confined this discussion to 4G, because 5G is changing the picture. But it is not changing the picture as much as you may think. With 5G, both towers and phones will aim narrow beams at each other. This will further increase the effective power of both towers and phones more than tenfold, if you happen to be standing in the beam. But what this also means is that a person using a cell phone will be even more hazardous than before to any person or animal in their immediate vicinity, and to any bird or insect that flies between the phone and the tower. And since there are billions of phones on earth, woe be to any creature that still wants to fly through the air at all. Not because the towers will be emitting radiation at all times, but because there are so many cell phones to aim their beams at.

The late Pelda Levey, a co-founder of the Cellular Phone Task Force, told this joke about cell phones: “I have both good news and bad news about cell phones. The bad news is that a cell phone can give you a brain tumor. The good news is that if you feel one coming on, you can always call 911.”

Calling 911 will not save the Earth. Throwing away your cell phone just might. It might begin the healing. Arthur FirstenbergAuthor, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and LifeP.O. Box 6216Santa Fe, NM 87502
phone: +1
March 17, 2020

“Anti-Jewish” Dresden Manifesto (1882) Conceded Defeat

(Left, Adolf Stoecker (1835 -1909) was the court chaplain to Kaiser Wilhelm II, a politician, and a German Lutheran theologian who founded the Christian Social Party and attempted to roll back Jewish control. He helped organize the 1882 “Anti Jewish Conference.”) 
Is this why Dresden was so maliciously destroyed in 1944? 
The current COVID ruse to bring in (((Communism))) is thethe outcome of realities identified in this manifesto.  

A Dresden conference shows how Jewish hegemony was a fait accompli 139 years ago and explains why the West’s racial cohesion and Christian heritage are under vicious satanist attack. Read this and ask yourself, “Could Hitler have come to power without Masonic Jewish complicity?” 

(Note – This is a key article I repost every year as I have many new readers.) 

The Secret Masonry is setting up “our own, to all appearance, off position which in at least one of its organs [Nazis] will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.” (Protocols of Zion, 12.11)
But no man said anything about him [Jesus] openly for fear of the Jews. (John 7:13)
 “A new war in defense of democracy and of alleged law is being prepared in all haste. An alliance of all the Jewish groups is already complete; it bears the official title of the alliance of the three great democracies, the English, the American, and the French. . . . Israel requires world war and soon!… Israel is positively of the opinion that time is getting short. To their mind, their world war is a necessity in order that, in the name of indivisible peace, all that portion of mankind who wish to cast off the Jewish yoke, may be laid low.”    — Revue Internationale des sociétés secrétes, April 1937  


(Slightly revised from Jan 6, 2016 ) 
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

The last significant effort to defend Christian national values was the “First International Anti-Jewish Conference” held in Dresden in September 1882. 

The conference attracted 300 prominent businessmen, aristocrats, politicians, clergy, lawyers, physicians, farmers and intellectuals from Germany, Austria, Hungry and Russia. They produced a manifesto addressed to “the Governments and Peoples of Christian Nations Threatened by Judaism” which shows how Jewish hegemony was a fait accompli 138 years ago, and explains why the West’s racial cohesion and Christian heritage are in serious disarray. 


The Manifesto begins by saying Europe has been invaded by a foreign race more dangerous and insidious than Arabs, Tartars or Turks in the past because of “its means and objectives.” 

Jewish “emancipation” following the French Revolution (“Equality, Fraternity, Liberty”) removed protections against “a race whose first and foremost thoughts and energies are everywhere aimed at putting other nations in the moral and material shackles of slaves…” 

“According to the Jews’ religious and national traditions, all of these peoples were created merely to serve them. The principle of equality was also applied to a race that does not wish to be equal with us, that considers itself a people privileged by God and [regards] the rest of mankind as lower beings, impure animals. The principle of fraternity was also applied to a race that does not even acknowledge non-Jews as neighbors and fellow human beings and according to whose Talmud non-Jews are enemies destined for eradication.”

Left. Merkel receives an award from her masters.
“Moreover, cheating, stealing from them, bleeding them dry, bringing ruin upon them, perjuring against them, dishonoring, and even killing them constitutes an activity pleasing to their God. Small wonder, therefore, if modern liberalism, identifying more and more with the ascendant Jews, has taken the shape of pseudo-liberalism. In the Jews’ hands, it has turned into a convenient tool for realizing their plans for world domination and putting irons on the European peoples.”

As a result of Jewish monopoly on government and finance, “the farmer, the big landowner, the industrialist, the artisan, the merchant, etc. , have all gotten caught up in material dependency upon Jews…they were forced to turn into their obedient servants, their train bearers. What’s more, the Jews hire influential men who are active in public life to fill well-paid positions at banks, railways, insurance companies, etc. These individuals are thus virtually kept as Jewish vassals and are the most zealous and influential supporters of Jewish power in the legislatures and governments. “

As a result of Illuminati Jewish instigated wars, “the governments of some indebted countries have become nothing more than Jewish institutions, Jewish collection agencies. This explains the complete inactivity of these governments with respect to the Jewish question and also their hostile behavior against their own populations in favor of Jewry.” 


Due to media ownership, “until recently no newspaper in Central Europe would have dared to speak the truth vis – à – vis Jewry. Thus the Jews have become absolute masters, fabricators of public opinion. Any complaint raised against them, however, justified it may be, is suppressed. Any article that addresses the subject of Jewish dominance to the slightest extent is done away with.” 

Political advancement “is dependent upon the favorable position of the Jewish press…As a result, intellectual slavery and moral cowardice vis – à – vis Jewry is one of the most characteristic features of our age.” 


Ambitious Christians  “become train bearers of Jewish power; they turn into traitors to their own nation and race and thus to their own blood relations. In many countries, the Jews have adulterated the system of [Freemason] lodges, stripped it of its essence, and degraded it into one of the most dangerous and effective instruments of Jewish power.” 

“Mainly by means of the press, Jewry increasingly undermines the Christian religion, which … during Roman times,… saved the European Aryan race from moral bankruptcy, on the one hand, and semi-civilized barbarity, on the other, and also regenerated it. It did so by setting the civilization and culture of the European Aryan race on firm religious, moral, and social foundations.” 

“Christian religion is the most powerful reaction against Jewish tendencies to achieve world domination. It is an insurmountable protest against the elevation of the Semitic above the Aryan race, and so it is only natural that the Jewish clan is a sworn mortal enemy of both the founder of this religion and the Christian religion itself. 

Accordingly, Jewry can only firmly establish the superiority and rule of the Semitic race when it has managed to defeat the natural reaction opposing it and to destroy the institution of Christianity.” 


The 1882 Manifesto deftly describes the impotence of Christian leadership which is just as obvious today. There was no “Second International Anti Jewish Conference.” The participants recognized they were fighting a lost cause. They did not propose measures because “this nation of parasites has become much too deeply ingrained in the body of our societal and state life for this first congress to operate under the delusion that its potentially detailed propositions could be carried out today.” 

This was in spite of the fact that Eugen Duhring, left, laid out a detailed program the previous year (1881) in his book “On the Jews.” Ironically, it required the Illuminati Jewish-sponsored Nazis to enact many of Duhring’s proposals, which were similar to racial policies in effect in Israel today. 

The rise of the Nazis led to the genocide of about six millionGerman antiSemites (i.e. Nazis) in WW2 and some 50 million other non-Jews. Given the 1882 assessment, do you think the Nazis could have achieved power without Illuminati Jewish sponsorship? As in chess, often you sacrifice a player (i.e. non-Zionist Jews) to win the game.  

Generally, the tone of the Manifesto gets more petty and racist, tarring all Jews with the same brush, saying all Jews are cosmopolitans with no loyalty to country or attachment to land, incapable of honesty, hard work or scientific and creative originality, driving farmers to destitution with their usury. 
While I agree with the Manifesto’s description of Organized Jewry, & its goals, many if not most Jews were patriotic, hard-working and wanted to assimilate. An estimated 100,000 Jews served in the German army in WW1, and 18,000 won the Iron Cross. 12,000 died in action. In the 1930’s, 60% of all German Jewish marriages were interracial. The Illuminati had to create Hitler to force them to go to Israel. 

Christian leaders should have encouraged the process of Jewish assimilation already underway. Instead, the 1882 Conference concluded that the only solution was expulsion. 
“Europe belongs to the Christian peoples and therefore should not be the testing ground for the hunger for power of any hostile, domineering, non-Christian national element. The history of past centuries amply proves that legal decrees restricting the Jewish race – no matter how strict they are – do not achieve the desired result.”

Whatever we think of this Manifesto, it does provide a unique historical perspective on our world today. We are living in the twilight of Christian civilization which has suffered a series of colossal failures and defeats which have been disguised as just wars, civil rights, diversity, sexual liberation, feminism, gay rights, migration, etc. But this perspective can strengthen our resolve to oppose the further degradation of society by the satanist Illuminati. 

RELATED – German Jews Would Have Backed Hitler 
————- 25% of Germans, 42% of children are from Migrant Backgrounds
Makow –  Anti Semitism has Respectable Pedigree 
———    World War One- First Christian Holocaust ———Hitler was a Godsend to IsraelDetails of Zionist-Nazi Collaboration

MacDonald – Anti Semite Conceded Jewish Hegemony in 1879


On Instagram last week, I shared a tweet of mine and below it I wrote out Titus 2:3-5. “The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”

One woman then asked me if women in the workforce are blaspheming the word of God. I decided to check out some things in the old commentaries about women being keepers at home and blaspheming the word of God. It’s interesting to note that they don’t say anything about “careers” since women didn’t have careers back thencontrary to popular opinions.

“Home duties, cares, pleasures, sacrifices of self—these God-appointed duties ought to fill the mind and the heart of the young wife.” (Ellicot Commentary)

“House-wives, not spending their time in gadding abroad, but in looking to the affairs of their own families.” (Matthew Poole’s Commentary)

“Keepers at home: minding their own family affairs, not gadding abroad; and inspecting into, and busying themselves about other people’s matters. And this they say is what is meant by the woman’s being an helpmeet for man, that while he is abroad about his business, she is , “sitting at home”, and keeping his house; and this they observe is the glory and honour of the woman.” (Gill’s Exposition)

Instead of women having careers back then, the women would try to find ways to be outside of their homes, being busy bodies, gossiping, and doing anything they could to get out of their home duties, just as women today will go “run errands” frequently to shop when they don’t need a thing. Nowadays, women can easily neglect their home duties by spending their days scrolling through social media and being busybodies and gossipers.

What do the old commentaries say about blaspheming the word of God?

“That the word of God be not blasphemed – That the gospel may not be injuriously spoken of, on account of the inconsistent lives of those who profess to be influenced by it. The idea is, that religion ought to produce the virtues here spoken of, and that when it does not, it will be reproached as being of no value.” (Barnes’ Notes) We blaspheme God’s Word when we don’t obey Him, what He has called us to do.

“That the word of God be not blasphemed:as for the discharge of their duty towards God, so for the credit and reputation of the gospel, that for their carriage contrary to the rules of nature and morality, as well as of religion, the gospel may not be evil spoken of, as if from that they had learned their ill and indecent behaviour.” (Matthew Poole’s Commentary)

“These words refer to all the exhortations from Titus 2:2 onwards, but more particularly to those clauses enforcing home duties immediately preceding. There was, of course, the fear that wives, carried away by religious fervour, might neglect the plainer every-day duties for the seemingly loftier and more self-denying occupations included under the head of religious works.” (Ellicot’s Commentary) This one was interesting to say the least! This would include all of the female preachers/speakers who leave their homes, since they’ve either had a “vision” or “heard a word from the Lord” that their ministry outside of the home is more important than the one inside. (Did you know that many cults have been started by women “hearing the voice of the Lord”?)

So after looking at this, do all women in the workforce blaspheme God’s Word?

Women who don’t want to be home and raise their own children but would rather have a career, yes, they are blaspheming God’s Word.

What about women whose husbands want them to work? In this case, it’s the husband who will be held accountable for asking his wife to leave her God ordained role for money.

What about single women? Widows sixty years old and older who must work don’t blaspheme the Word BUT in God’s Word, the older widows are to be cared for by relatives and the church (1 Timothy 4:4,9), not have to leave their homes for the workforce. So, in this case, the relatives and churches are blaspheming His Word for disobeying God by not providing for the older widows.

What about the younger widows? God’s exhortation to them is to marry, bear children, and guide the home (1 Timothy 5:14). What if no one asks them to marry? In 1 Timothy 5:16, we are told, “If any man or woman that believeth have widows, let them relieve them, and let not the church be charged; that it may relieve them that are widows indeed.” So the families/relatives are to provide for the young widows until they get married. The children have already lost their father. They don’t need to lose their mothers too. If the families don’t provide for the families and the church refuses too, then both are the ones who will be held accountable. There’s no place where widows are encouraged to go out and make their own money to provide for their families.

What about single mothers who have divorced their husbands, because they weren’t “happy” and now must work? Yes, they blaspheme God’s Word since they are commanded to be keepers at home and through their actions, prevented this from happening. In divorcing their husbands, they were forced into the workforce and away from their homes and children which all greatly harms their children.

What about single mothers who, by no choice of their own because their husbands divorced them, must work? No, I don’t believe they blaspheme His Word, but they should seek the Lord daily and ask for Him to make a way home for them, since their children still need and want them home.

What about single mothers who had babies out of wedlock? Any sin against God’s commands blasphemes His word. Their fornication blasphemed His Word. Their children are suffering due to their fornication. But are they now blaspheming His Word by not being able to be a keeper at home? This is a hard one to answer. I don’t know. All I know is that they need to seek the Lord in prayer and ask Him to make a way for them to be home full time. Their children need and want them home full time just as much as other children.

Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
Matthew 12:31

When Do Mothers Blaspheme God’s Word?

Makow – Feminism is a Poisoned Apple


(People who are satanically possessed can no longer recognize evil, i.e. feminism, let alone resist) 
Virtually everything deemed “progressive” and “modern” is, in fact, satanic, designed like the vaccine, to destroy those foolish enough to eat the poisoned apple.

“Why does a man love a woman? Because she surrenders her power to him.  Yes, a man’s love is a function of his egotism. He loves her because she gives herself to him. She empowers him and becomes part of him.  This is how two people become one.”

Revisioned from August 14, 2020By Henry Makow PhD

Cabalist Jews and Freemasons have
been corrupting and undermining society for at least 200 years in advance of imposing their perverse tyranny in the form of the coronavirus scam today.
Virtually everything that is deemed “progressive” and “modern” is in fact Satanic, designed to destroy those foolish enough to eat the poisoned apple. Humanity is satanically possessed by Cabalism – Cabalist Jews and Freemasons i.e the Illuminati.
Feminism is designed to destroy the heterosexual dynamic, marriage, and family. Three generations of women have been indoctrinated into a self-destructive set of beliefs. They have been taught to seek power when they really want love.
How can a woman find permanent love? By finding a man worthy of her trust. For a woman, love = trust. The heterosexual dynamic is the exchange of female worldly power for male power expressed as love.
Why does a man love a woman? Because she surrenders her power to him.
Yes, a man’s love is a function of his egotism. He loves her because she gives herself to him. She empowers him and becomes part of him. This is how two people become one. Sex is the emblem of this exclusive bond.
Naturally, he wants her to be happy. He isn’t domineering. He loves and respects her. Paradoxically, the more she surrenders to him, the more he belongs to her.
Sexual intercourse is an act of possession: a man possessing a woman. Obviously this must take place in the context of a committed long-term relationship, ideally marriage. Women want to be possessed by loving husbands.

The Satanists (Communists) have convinced young women that men are wife beaters and family is oppressive. Women just swallowed the poison. Millions are bitter and alone.
Sex is another factor. Women need sex as much as men and more. They need a lot of it. They’re not getting it.
Women need a husband’s passionate lifelong love more than anything else in the world. When a man makes love to his wife, he is expressing his feelings, not just his lust. He is saying she is the most desirable woman in the world.
In a hookup situation, a man is just relieving himself. This is the opposite of the adoration women crave.


As a result, many women on the Left are sexually frustrated and dysfunctional. They compensate by lesbianism, obesity and radical politics, exactly what Satanists want. 
These women make a virtue of necessity. They act “chic” and pretend to stand for social justice. 
Really they are just dupes. 
Roadkill on the highway to dystopia.
FEMINISM HAS CHAMPIONED PORNFeminism pretends to champion women. In fact, it destroys femininity. 
Women want a committed lifelong relationship. He is her King. She is his Queen. Her sexuality is the crown jewel of this marriage.  

For women to give this to all-and-sundry is self-defeating, to say the least. For women to pose naked is dehumanizing, de-sexing, the equivalent of a hysterectomy.
What qualities make a woman attractive to a man? Are they only physical?
They are innocence, submissiveness, sweetness of temperament, modesty, dignity, character, cheerfulness, resourcefulness, talent, purity, warmth, wit, caring, intelligence.
Are these qualities fostered in our hook-up culture? By hopping from bed to bed? By teaching girls that their value lies in their sex appeal? By teaching that masculinity is toxic, and lesbianism is cool?
Of course not because Satanists want men and women to be incompatible. They want women to take direction from them, not from loving husbands. Thus many women are gofers for the Satanists, especially in media, education, law, and government. These Leftist women are dupes and traitors to society.
The coronavirus hoax proves society has been subverted by people who want to enslave us. They are Freemasons and Cabalist Jews empowered by the Cabalist world banking cartel.
They want us to eat the poisoned apple
and die.
Shall we oblige? —-
RelatedPossessiveness is Part of Marriage
—————— The Lost Art of Femininity
————Why Kabbalah is Satanic
—————– Satanism Explained
—————– Exterminating the Goyim is the basis of Kabbalah

Friendship and truth

Friendship.  It is a beautiful idea, and when we look back at history, we see many wonderful friendships based on a love of courage, virtue, and truth.  There was David and Jonathan.  Jesus and his Apostles.  C. S Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien.  In today’s world we are constantly lectured by the psychobabblers that if we aren’t popular, and we aren’t having sex with people we aren’t married to, that there is something deeply wrong with us, and we have to get their advice to figure out what it is, and of course, we must pay them for this advice.  Sigmund Freud, the Father of psychiatry was a world class libertine and a fraud, and his opinion isn’t worth two hoots.  Yet, psychiatrists today get paid billions of dollars today, after paying billions to universities for ‘training’ to learn this nonsense, and then, when your average hurting human comes to them, they feed them this gibberish and the cure for their patients is worse than the original disease.

True friendship must be based upon truth.  The advise of Polonius in Hamlet is excellent still, “This above all: to thine own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canstnot then be false to any man.”  If we are not first the friend of God and our own conscience, we cannot truly be the friend of any other human, for any friendship that exists with other humans in the absence of the friendship with God and our conscience, must be superficial, shallow, and inferior to the friendships formed when we first are friends with God and our conscience.  

Reviewing the Ten Commandments, it is clear that the first four deal with man’s relationship with God, the fifth deal with man’s relationship with the humans God tasked to bring him into existence, namely his parents, and the sixth through the tenth deal with man’s relationships with his fellow humans.  In today’s sick society, we have schools, the media, tech companies, television, movies, and celebrities lying to us that relationships with humans who blatantly defy God is more important than our relationships with God himself and his commandments.  Which explains why we have such a corrupt and ignorant society.  

‘One man with God is a majority’, said Brother Andrew, and how true that is.  Friendship must be based upon objective truth, for it is impossible for two people who have different subjective truths to long remain friends.  Often you see in the Bible, which is the ancient document with the most manuscript evidence in human history, that Godly men were alone.  Abraham had no friends when he left his home.  Isaac was alone often.  Jacob wrestled with an angel alone.  Joseph went into slavery alone.  Moses was alone in the desert after fleeing Egypt.  David was alone when running away from Saul.  Christ was alone in the wilderness when tempted by the Devil, and Paul was often alone in jail, and in his missionary trips. You can’t write massive letters, and his made up over half the New Testament, when you are enjoying the company of friends, you must be solitary to think and write coherently.  

Too often Americans sacrifice the truth out of a desire to get along with others.  But, you never find a man of God doing that in the Bible.  There is tact, kindness, longsuffering, and patience, but never did you see a man of God willingly give up his truth out of fear of man.  That said, there were three instances of Abraham and Isaac, out of fear, not telling the truth that Sarah and Rebeccah were their wives, nearly leading to their wives being taken as wives by foreign kings.  

We will not be popular for telling the truth.  As Tertullian said, ‘The first reaction to truth is hatred’, and as Plato said, ‘No man is hated more than he who tells the truth’.  But, does that mean we don’t tell the truth?  Must we cower and cringe in fear, when God commanded,  in 2 Timothy 1:7, ‘For God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind’?

Our destiny depends on how we respond to adversity.  We will be remembered by our courage or cowardice.  Future lives will be made better or worse by our example, and it is our duty, to live a life of truth, service, love, and compassion.  There can be no love and compassion without truth.

Often friendships are pursued for selfish reasons, but a friendship pursued for selfless reasons means it is based upon mutual love of truth, and of service to God and others.  The greatest friends are those who are first the friend of God.  

Viewing others experience and my own, it becomes apparent that those are true friends of others who have first practiced denial of self. Those who indulge self make poor friends.

Proverbs 17:17 – A friend loveth at all times, and a brother is born for adversity.

Proverbs 27:6 – Faithful [are] the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy [are] deceitful.

Proverbs 22:24– Make no friendship with an angry man; and with a furious man thou shalt not go:

1 Thessalonians 5:21

Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

Know thine enemy

It is impossible to fight an enemy you do not know and cannot see.

Why is it important to “know thine enemy”?

Arguably, Robert E. Lee lost the battle of Gettysburg because if a lack of intelligence. Normally, J.E.B. Stuart would give reconnaissance, giving Lee a good idea of the enemies size, and location. But before July 1st, 1963, Stuart was on a foolhardy mission behind Union lines, and was unavailable to give Lee updates. As a result, Lee was seduced into a battle where he did not know the enemies location or strength, and, was forced to fight on very unfavorable terrain, with his troops attacking uphill for most of the battle, with ferocious cannon fire raining on down from the formidable heights of Culps Hill, Little Round Top, and Cemetery and Seminary Ridge. It was a devastating defeat for the South, and the turning point of the Civil War, though the South was controlled by the same bankers who control both parties today.

Both Republicans and Democrats are controlled by the owners of the Federal Reserve, who are Talmudic Jews. Every President from Woodrow Wilson onward has been controlled by these snakes. That includes Reagan and Trump. Trump is a double crosser. Clinton, Obama, Trump, and Biden are all controlled, it’s a cleverly contrived act, and why is anyone surprised? Reagan and Trump were both actors, the Talmudic Jews have owned Hollyweird from the start, and are very good at making up stories to deceive people. They even boast about it in their movies, two examples being “Wag the dog”, and “Primary Colors”.

The real enemy is the owners of the Federal Reserve, “The synagogue of Satan”, “the MoneyChangers”. But, 99% of Americans don’t know this is the enemy, and even worse, those of us who do know this is the enemy, don’t know their names, where they live, or their plans.

Meanwhile, while we investigate, their agents are online to sow confusion and mayhem. You can recognize their agents by those who show up to slur this as “anti-Semitic”, and the rest of the labels the Cultural Marxists love. No one has ever rationally refuted what I’ve said which has been researched with hundreds of books. Yet, these comments get massive criticism from anonymous nobodies, suggesting the bankers have armies of fake accounts, to give the illusion of widespread support for ideas thy like and disapproval for ideas they dislike.

They love those defending Biden and Trump, because that plays right into their agenda. This comment will be downvoted and irrationally attacked by dozens, likely. The Talmudic Jews control both sides media, schools, tech companies, Hollyweird, victim groups, Communist China, corporations, and so much more!

Be careful, the bankers are masters of supporting both sides in wars, and gaining more power and wealth as a result. They did it in both World Wars already, and are likely cooking up World War 3 right now.

To be clear, the greatest enemy any of us faces is our own sins, and if the battle against those are not won, all victories against external enemies matter not at all.