A Malicious Duo: Two Laws that Destroyed America’s Culture

13 March 2005

A documentation in two parts

During the 20th century, the United States Congress passed many laws that negatively affected White Americans in one way or another. However, none of those laws delivered as much cultural damage to White America as did two back-to-back laws passed in the mid-1960s: the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965.

The purpose of this essay is to show that people of a certain ethnicity were instrumental in the creation of the 1964 and 1965 laws.


In the late 1950s, a civil-rights revolution spread throughout America – including within the U.S. government in Washington, D.C. Various legislative proposals, all designed to benefit racial minorities in one way or another, were tossed around by lobbyists, Senators and Representatives. Throughout the country, civil-rights groups demanded the passage of laws that would give minorities equal rights.

Although America’s civil-rights groups appeared to be led by Blacks, in reality they were usually led — or at least steered — by Jews. Most of the men who founded the NAACP were jews, and for decades it had a jew as president. Martin Luther King Jr.’s chief advisor was jew Stanley Levison. The major civil-rights groups were funded mainly by Jewish donations. Furthermore, important civil-rights cases were argued and won in the courts by skilled Jewish lawyers. For example Jack Greenberg, who was a key figure surrounding the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision of 1954. Another Jewish attorney, Nathan Margold, produced the in-depth report that became the NAACP’s blueprint for its legal strategy in outlawing racial segregation. In fact, it could be said that the Margold report virtually ended racial segregation in America.

The stage for the civil-rights revolution within the federal government was set by Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler (D-NY), via his groundbreaking Civil Rights Act of 1957, the first civil-rights law since the Civil War era. Celler wrote and sponsored the Civil Rights Act of 1957, which came from his House bill, H.R.6127, which was signed into law by President Eisenhower in September 1957. That law led to other minority-benefiting laws, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Congressman Celler was a powerful force in the creation of the major civil-rights laws, the main reason being that, during the late 1950s/early 1960s, civil-rights advocates had learned to “use” the House of Representatives to advance their legislation. Thanks to Celler’s chairmanship of certain House committees, civil-rights bills sailed through the House. Furthermore, civil-rights advocates were often able to use Congressional rules to allow their bills to bypass anti-civil-rights committees in the Senate, which increased the chances of their legislation becoming law. In other words, the House of Representatives was the “secret weapon” that was used by civil-rights advocates to create civil-rights laws, and Celler was the gatekeeper, so to speak, on the path that was taken by the civil-rights bills as they moved around the House.

Now we will highlight the 1964 and 1965 Acts, beginning with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Part I: the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Do you know why a private employer must — by law — hire Blacks, Mexicans and women? If you don’t, the reason is: the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – specifically Title VII of that Act, which outlawed any type of discrimination in employment. In other words, with the passage of that Act, private employers were no longer free to hire whom they wanted. In the name of freedom and civil rights, the Constitution was subverted, and genuine civil rights were taken away.

That 1964 Act, which came from Congressman Celler’s House bill H.R.7152, was introduced in Congress on June 20, 1963, and signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson on July 2, 1964. It is the most far-reaching civil-rights law ever created in America. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 created, among other things, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which penalizes private businesses if they don’t hire a certain number of racial minorities or women. The EEOC today functions as a medium through which organized coloreds can exact tribute from hard-working white men and the companies they found. The real “civil right” the 1964 act created was the right of the jewish bureaucrat and the black man to shake down the hated white.

It is worth mentioning that President John F. Kennedy was sort of responsible for the 1964 Act. He proposed a new, upgraded civil-rights law in the summer of 1963 and submitted it to Congress. The end result of that was Celler’s bill H.R.7152, which was actually a stronger civil-rights bill than Kennedy wanted. (The idea for a strong civil-rights bill did not come from Kennedy himself but from many others, including the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights [see below] and Senator Hubert Humphrey).[1]

Many people feel that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is unconstitutional. They feel that it infringes on private-property rights by forcing private businesses to bend to the federal government’s employment rules, and that it violates states’ rights, since it compels the government to involve itself in civil-rights matters within the various states. The law also clearly infringes upon the freedom of association desires of White people. In effect it became illegal for whites to protect themselves from blacks, or in any way to refrain from mixing with them. Today anyone who calls for a return of the true civil right of free association will be attacked by the media as a racist who wants to return to the bad old days before civil rights.

It is true that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed by gentiles in Congress, and signed into law by a gentile as well. But that Act needed to be conceived, written and lobbied-for first — otherwise it would never have come into being. That’s where these notable Jews came in:

Arnold Aronson (1911-1998) was founder and leader of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR).2 The LCCR, a powerful coalition of political and religious groups, organized major, countrywide lobbying efforts to aid passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Aronson was an icon within the Black civil rights movement. He received an award from President Bill Clinton, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, for his civil-rights work. Indeed, civil-rights activist Clarence Mitchell Jr. once noted: “There would not have been a civil rights movement without the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights and there would not have been a Leadership Conference on Civil Rights without (Arnold) Aronson.” LCCR has been called the “chief lobbying force” for the 1960s civil-rights acts.[3] Curiously, the building occupied by the LCCR was owned by a Jewish organization.[4] The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was written at the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism in Washington, D.C., under the watch of the LCCR.

Now we again mention Congressman Celler (1888-1981). Not only did Celler introduce the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into Congress, he oversaw the general creation of the Act within two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives. Celler not only chaired the Judiciary Committee but also House subcommittee No. 5, which considered H.R.7152 [5]. Subcommittee No. 5 was said to be the “most aggressive” entity in strengthening H.R.7152 [6]. Furthermore, Celler handpicked some of the members of Subcommittee #5, ensuring that the 1964 Act had plenty of “teeth”; and he also was the floor manager in the House during debate on H.R.7152. Additionally, Celler put more teeth into H.R.7152 than were needed, in case the bill was watered-down later by its opponents – which it was, via a compromise bill called a “clean bill,” which was the same bill with a few words changed to ensure more Congressional support for it. Celler employed tricks to get H.R.7152 through Congress, such as using a discharge petition to aid passage of the bill through the congressional committees. Of significance is that Celler lied about the intent of the 1964 Act when he denied that it would prevent employers from hiring whom they wanted:

“[T]he charge has been made that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to be established by title VII of the bill would have the power to prevent a business from employing and promoting the people it wished, and that a ‘Federal inspector’ could then order the hiring and promotion only of employees of certain races or religious groups. This description of the bill is entirely wrong…” [7]

Celler had a long record of pro-civil-rights activity in Congress. In fact, Celler could be called one of the biggest Congressional cheerleaders for legislation that somehow benefited racial minorities.

And finally, the main author of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was Jewish assistant attorney general Norbert A. Schlei (1929-2003). (Schlei also wrote the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

1. On Kennedy as being prompted by others to shift to a stronger civil-rights stance, see the essay “A Brief History of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” by Robert D. Loevy; online at: http://faculty1.coloradocollege.edu/~bloevy/CivilRightsActOf1964/ . Here.

2. Aronson is also called a “co-founder” of LCCR – a significant understatement. For example, the City College of New York mentioned, on its website, that one of its students received an Arnold Aronson Fellowship, a fellowship that is “named for the LCCR’s founder.”

3. On LCCR as chief lobbying force see “Papers of the NAACP, Part 13, 1940-1955,” preface titled “Scope and Content Note,” page xi

4. On LCCR building as being owned by the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, see Broken Alliance: the Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America. (New York; Charles Scribner’s Sons); by Jonathan Kaufman; p. 98.

5. On Celler as heading both the House Judiciary Committee and House Subcommittee No. 5, see article “LBJ Champions the Civil Rights Act of 1964” by Ted Gittinger and Allen Fisher; U.S. National Archives & Records Administration, Summer 2004; and “The Background And Setting of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” Chapter 1, by Robert D. Loevy, online.

[6] On subcommittee #5 as the most aggressive entity in stiffening the 1964 Act, see working paper “Southern Roots of the New Right: John C. Stennis and Federal School Desegregation, 1954-1972,” by Joseph Crespino; online; to be formally published in 2006.

[7] from the opening speech in support of H.R.7152, made by Celler on the House floor, June 1963


Part II: the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965 (aka the Hart-Celler Act, the Immigration Act of 1965, and the Immigration Reform Act of 1965)

Like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the idea for serious immigration reform appeared to the public to have come from President John F. Kennedy. After all, Kennedy had officially called for the reform of America’s immigration laws in a letter that he presented to Congress on July 23, 1963.

A liberal immigration law, the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 — which came from House bill H.R.2580 — was written by Congressman Celler and gentile Senator Philip A. Hart (D-MI; 1912-1976), although Celler acted as the pointman for the Act by introducing it into Congress in January 1965. (Only Celler was mentioned by President Lyndon Johnson when he signed the Hart-Celler Act into law in October 1965, which highlights Celler’s major — as opposed to Hart’s minor — involvement in the creation of the Act. It seems as though Celler simply used Hart as a co-sponsor of the bill).[1]

Celler had a long history of advocating liberal immigration laws, so much so that he was the subject of a 1994 research paper bearing the telling subtitle “Leading Advocate of Liberal Immigration Policy.”[2]

The Hart-Celler Act amended the McCarran-Walter immigration act of 1952. The McCarran-Walter law had mandated that immigrants be admitted into America based on their national origin. The Hart-Celler law abolished the national-origin rule and replaced it with family reunification, aka chain immigration, i.e. the close relatives of immigrants already living in America were allowed to immigrate to the U.S. as well.

For his part, Senator Hart worked closely with a group called the American Immigration and Citizenship Conference in an effort to get the 1965 Act passed. That Conference included 12 Jewish groups and the heavily-Jewish ACLU.

The Hart-Celler Act significantly changed the ethnic make-up of immigration into America. Before the Act was passed, the majority of immigrants coming to America was White. After the Act, the majority of immigrant arrivals was non-White (roughly 80% of the immigrants came to the U.S. from non-White countries). In other words, the 1965 Act reversed the racial make-up of immigration into America.

Jewish Senator Jacob Javits (1904-1986) also played a key role in the creation of the Hart-Celler Act. And Jewish attorney Schlei (see Part I above) conceived the idea of putting a “first come, first served” immigration rule into the Act, to replace the previous national-origins rule [3].

(Revealingly, an action by Jewish Senator Herbert H. Lehman (1878-1963) — the son of an immigrant and a major player in pro-immigration legislation — showed how important the issue of immigration reform can be to Jews: in the early 1950s, in what might be described as ‘Jewish networking on immigration matters,’ Lehman helped to install a Jew, Harry Rosenfield, as the executive director of the President’s Commission on Immigration and Naturalization. Then Lehman, his Jewish aid and Rosenfield endeavored to help pro-immigration Congressmen with matters pertaining to the liberalization of immigration laws. The chairman of the President’s Commission on Immigration and Naturalization was also a Jew, Philip Perlman. And telling of Jewish attitudes toward the McCarran-Walter law were Senator Lehman’s remarks that it had a “racist” and “xenophobic” aura. Apparently for Lehman, a post-WWII Zionist, such an aura surrounding immigration law was okay in Israel, but not in America.)

Powerful Jewish organizations also greatly aided the passage of Hart-Celler by, for example, issuing formal statements of support for the Act to the Congressional committees. Both the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee played “major” roles in supporting the Act [4].

The Hart-Celler Act has, in just a few decades, transformed America into a mixed-race country teeming with Africans, Asians, and Latinos. And that was exactly what the American Jewish community intended all along, since Jews can theoretically avoid “anti-Semitism” by blending into racially-diverse populations.[5][6]

1. Celler mentioned as co-authoring the 1965 Act: the President’s Initiative On Race, Advisory Board, Meeting, held at the Mayflower Hotel, Washington, D.C., September 30, 1997, in the recorded minutes of the meeting. (Note: contains a typo in the mention of Celler’s name.)

2. “Emanuel Celler of Brooklyn: Leading Advocate of Liberal Immigration Policy, 1945-52,” by Bernard Lemelin, Canadian Review of American Studies, vol. 24, No 1 (1994), pp. 81-111

3. On Schlei conceiving the “first come, first served” idea: paper “Old Blood, New Blood, Weak Blood: The Nature of U.S. Immigration Laws” by Ronald Fernandez, Ph.D., Central Connecticut State University, Occasional Paper No. 63, July 2001

4. On the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee’s role in the 1965 Act: essay “Jews And Immigration: Steinlight Soldiers On,” by Marcus Epstein; published online at VDARE’s website, June 19, 2004.

5. Regarding Jews and immigration policy, see Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s report “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review” (1998); online at http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-immigration.html

6. Details of the 1965 Act can be seen here:http://uscis.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/legishist/526.htm .


In the late 1950s/early 1960s, a political movement appeared in America demanding that new laws be created to benefit racial minorities and liberalize immigration laws. That political movement spawned two important laws: the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965.

Whites in Congress passed those laws, but Jews laid the foundation for the laws, built the laws, and lobbied for them, both inside and outside of Congress. Jews took advantage of standard White benevolence and used Whites to help them pass those laws not because the Jews necessarily cared about the welfare of Blacks and non-White immigrants, but because the Jews wanted to make their new home safe from “anti-Semitism.” The Jews — always a clever people — knew that they could go unnoticed in a multicultural America, and in recent years they have (almost). Whether the multiculturalizing-of-America-to-benefit-the-Jews was good for Whites was beside the point, for as the late President Harry Truman said, the Jews are “very, very selfish.”

The 1964/1965 Acts damaged America’s White culture like no other laws in U.S. history. In fact, the odds are that they damaged American culture beyond repair. Thanks to those acts, the United States has gone from being a White republic to being a racial “melting-pot” (a term coined by the late Jewish writer Israel Zangwill), a “democracy” of racial and gender “equality,” a place in which Blacks, Mexicans and Asians vote for minority or female politicians; a place in which the government decides who you may hire; a place in which White women commute over long distances to work in big-city office buildings instead of raising children at home. Jews, as the prime mover behind these two malignant acts, bear a heavy responsibility for the cultural debasement that those laws produced for White America.



Mike Stone – Ten Things I Hate About my Fellow Americans


“After four years of fake viruses, fake pandemics, fake elections, fake food, fake shootings, and fake everything, I’ve made the following observations about my fellow Americans.”
by Mike Stone(henrymakow.com)

1) America is made up of dupes, fools, and morons. How else can you explain over 60% of the population voluntarily injecting themselves with a fake vaccine for a phony virus? 

How else can you explain roughly 99% of the population continuing to visit the very same doctors who just tried to poison them? 

Who else but a complete retard would do such a thing?.

2) Americans are incapable of handling the truth. Call it stupidity, call it immaturity, call it fear. They are so thoroughly brainwashed they are never coming back to reality.
3) Americans are filled with false pride that prevents them from admitting when they are wrong. This one is a head-scratcher. If someone shows me truthful evidence that counters a belief I have, I’m the first to say, “You know, you’re right. I was wrong about that.” 
4) Americans believe anything and everything they see on television, no matter how senseless. Here we are, four years later and most Americans still believe that the virus hoax was a real thing, they still believe that ballots are votes, they still believe that an impostor calling himself Joe Biden was elected president. The sole reason why they believe these things, and others just as dumb, is because they saw it on television. 
5) Americans are an unjust and immoral people. A truly just and moral people wouldn’t stand for what we’ve seen transpire over the last two decades and longer. They simply wouldn’t. The torches and pitchforks would come out. The freaks and traitors would be tarred and feathered, or worse. None of the problems we’re facing today would exist if Americans were just and moral.
6) Americans have no understanding of history. None. They were duped into fighting World War I, duped into fighting World War II, duped into fighting two Persian Gulf Wars, duped into invading Afghanistan. It just goes on and on. They think the Civil War was fought over slavery. They have no idea what the Federal Reserve is or how it came to be. They’ve never heard of the USS Liberty. They think 9/11 was orchestrated by Osama bin Laden and nineteen guys with box cutters. They believe Israel is our greatest ally. Their stupidity knows no bounds.


7) Americans are demonically possessed. I’ve written about this before. At this point, it’s undeniable. People are stupid, sure, and Americans are among the stupidest of all.

 But nobody can be as brainless and stupid as we’re seeing right now without being demonically possessed on some level. (In true Shakespearean irony, the ones who deny it the loudest are the ones possessed by the most demons.) 

Because so many Americans are demonically possessed, and because demons attract other demons, we have demonically possessed trannies posing as First Ladies, pop stars, and female athletes – and demonically possessed soy boys jerking off to their images.

8) Americans are more afraid of standing out from the herd than they are of death. Again, look at the hundreds of millions of Americans who were duped into injecting themselves with poison, rather than risk being looked upon unfavorably. Many of them are now dead. They chose death over disapproval.
9) Americans are addicted to sin. Envy, gluttony, drunkenness, immodest dress, pornography, masturbation, fornication, adultery, abortion . . . You name it, Americans are addicted to it. Even worse, they refuse to give up their sins. Rather than change their behavior, they will continue sinning all the way to hell.
10) Americans are baby-killers. Is there anything more evil or satanic than the murder or mutilation of an innocent child? Americans are all-in on both counts. They support abortion. They support the murder and genocide of Palestinian children. They support trannyism and the sexual mutilation of children. They support it all, and the worst ones of the bunch are the fake Christians who complain about Communism, but support Zionism, foolishly believing they are “saved.” I shudder to think of the fate that awaits them in the afterlife when they are cast into the deepest and darkest pits of hell.
Not everyone around the world is as sick and morally corrupt as Americans. After the Taliban defeated the U.S. military, Afghanistan banned all of the degeneracy that America imported into their country. In many African countries, abortion and pornography are illegal. Just as these countries and others have refused to accept the sickness of American culture, so can you. You don’t have to accept any of it. In fact, if you want to go to Heaven, you can’t accept it. Not one little shred.
This is a do-or-die situation. If we stand with the sin and degeneracy of America, we perish and are cast into the lake of fire. If we stop sinning and refuse to accept American degeneracy, then we at least have a chance of going to Heaven. Which do you choose?—Mike Stone is the author of the new book 101 Reasons Why You Might Have a Low IQhttps://shorturl.at/otL13 andTeen Boy’s Success Book: the Ultimate Self-Help Book for Boys; Everything You Need to Know to Become a Manhttps://amzn.to/3o0BQdO


Makow- Jews Should Prepare for Pogroms


(Bishop Gregory of Nyssa 335-395 AD –Cabalist Judaism has pitted Jews and Freemasons against God and man alike.) 

Saturday—Protesters surround synagogue in Los Angeles

Pogroms are riots and massacres of Jews that took place in Eastern Europe and Russia in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Often they were organized by Zionists to encourage emigration to Israel. 

Jews can continue to attribute antisemitism to bigotry and envy but the truth is that Organized Jewry (Rothschild world banking cartel) has a program to enslave and dispossess the goyim. Ordinary Jews will be blamed. Muslim migrants might carry out this retribution (ironic since Communist Jews brought them in to destroy European racial cohesion.) I speak for assimilated Jews. We must come out boldly against Zionism, Communism, the WEF and the NWO. None of you will listen, but you’ve been warned.

I repost articles because they are more pertinent today than when they were written.

“Zionism is but an incident of a far-reaching plan,” said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. “It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.”

In other words, the whole Jewish enterprise, Judaism, Zionism, Communism, etc. may be “powerful weapons” to enthrone the rule of Satan. Organized Jewry (WEF, Swab) took off their mask. (COVID “vaccine.” Agenda 2030). They want to despoil, enslave, and kill the non-Satanist Jews and goyim. Patriotic Israelis are fighting for this.

“Jewish Pharisees accepted the offer from Satan that Jesus rejected: “I will give you the Kingdom of the World (i.e. Money, Power) if you obey me.” Talmudic Judaism is dedicated to enthroning Lucifer and always has conspired to destroy Christianity.” Texe Marrs (The destruction of Christianity is almost complete) 

(Updated from Jan 14, 2006 and July 2019)

By Henry Makow PhD.

Mention the “Jewish Banker Conspiracy” and you’ll be as popular as a skunk at a garden party. In some places, you might even be arrested. Tolerant sophisticated people regard this concept as a hateful and tired cliche. They believe “anti-Semites” should be slandered, sent to jail, and lose their livelihood. 

But what if there actually were a “Jewish Banker Conspiracy?” Then these sophisticates would have egg on their face, wouldn’t they? They’d be exposed as rubes, victims of a stereotypical Jewish deception achieved by media coincidentally owned by the very same bankers. 

The “Jewish Banker Conspiracy” is not a chimaera. It is the plan of Rothschild-controlled central bankers to create a totalitarian system to protect their illegal private monopoly of the world’s credit. They create the medium of exchange, a mental construct, in the form of a debt to themselves. They print government currency for the price of the paper and then lend it to the government with interest. 

As the homeless man’s dog said, ” I could do this myself.” The government could create currency debt and interest-free.caroll.jpg

In the words of Bill Clinton’s mentor, Georgetown University professor Carol Quigley, who was an insider, the plan is “nothing less than to establish a world system… able to dominate the political system of each country.” They plan to control the whole system in “a feudalistic manner by the central banks of the world working in concert (and) by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.” (Tragedy and Hope, p. 324) 

The central banking families and their allies used their unfair advantage to gain a monopoly of the world’s wealth and a stranglehold on culture and politics. To make us accept their “New World Order,” (a.k.a. globalization) they need to distract, divide, and degrade humanity by destroying the four pillars of our personal identity and social cohesion (nation, race, religion, and family.) 

They sponsor Communism, Zionism, Socialism, Neo-Conservatism, Liberalism, Feminism, Gender Dysphoria, Multiculturalism, and “Diversity” to achieve this purpose. (Socialism substitutes government for the family.) Through control of intelligence agencies and secret societies, they sponsor terrorism (incl. 9-11), assassinations, revolutions, wars, and depressions. They may be planning another world war.

Anti-Semitism is caused because Jewish idealists, opportunists, and dupes play a prominent role in the above movements, especially Communism. As the New World Order becomes more onerous, anti-Semitism will inevitably increase. Jews need to acknowledge this rather than pretend “anti-Semites” are hallucinating. 

On the other hand, “anti-Semites” need to stop generalizing. Jews are very far from cohesive.

Jews are fleeing Jewish organizations in droves. According to a 2001 survey, 25% of the roughly 5 million American Jews identify with another faith. Another quarter are “secular” leaving just 51% to say they are Jewish by religion. One half of all Jews intermarry and three-quarters of these raise their children in another religion.

The majority of Jews probably would oppose the banker’s agenda if they understood it. I was heartened to hear Texe Marrs say recently that only 5% of Jews are aware of the big picture. Yet the other 95% may suffer if they continue to be indifferent to what is happening.


Many “anti-Semites” like Texe Marrs and Des Griffin believe that the Jewish Pharisees accepted the offer from Satan that Jesus rejected: “I will give you the Kingdom of the World (i.e. Money, Power) if you obey me.” They believe Talmudic Judaism is dedicated to enthroning Lucifer and always has conspired to destroy Christianity. The treatment of Christmas is proof that they are not hallucinating. 

Enthroning Satan/Lucifer means enthroning man in the role of God. This is called humanism or Illuminism (hence the “Enlightenment.”)

God is rejected. (God represents the natural development of mankind through adherence to spiritual absolutes like morality, justice, and truth.) shneerson.jpeg

A strong element in Talmudic Judaism restricts the definition of “man” to Jews. Thus, the course of human history can be seen as the replacement of God with man, and ultimately man with Jews (or man becomes Jewish.) Everything we call “modern” speaks to the banishment of God from the universe and the attempt to fill the void with the utterances of men/Jews/illuminists. That’s why so much modern culture is a fraud

Israel Shamir has suggested that the Jewish Holocaust is being used to deify Jews. The holocaust replaced the crucifixion as a sacred symbol of God sacrifice. The Holocaust Museums are the temples. 

Those Jews who welcome this scenario might be in for a rude awakening. The definition of Jewish is blurred. As I have suggested elsewhere, the central bankers have forged alliances based on money, marriage, and Freemasonry with the leading families of Europe and America. 

When gold is God, the extremely rich are the “Chosen People.” This myth, together with the Talmudic and Cabalistic traditions, is a perfect mechanism for elite totalitarian control. According to Israel Shahak, Talmudic Judaism has always been a model for a closed oppressive society. louis-b.-marshall-big.jpg

“Zionism is but an incident of a far-reaching plan,” said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. “It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.”

In other words, the whole Jewish enterprise, Judaism, etc. may be a “powerful weapon” to enthrone the rule of Satan. But the average Jew will take the blame in the form of anti-Semitism.

For example, the British royal family sees itself as descending from the House of David. A Jewish Mohel circumcised Prince Charles. Are the Windsors Jewish? (Douglas Reed, Somewhere South of Suez, p.356.)

Henry Kissinger once said, “A people who have been persecuted for 2000 years must be doing something wrong.” His unsympathetic attitude may echo his employers, the Illuminati bankers. 

What could Jews be doing wrong? The answer: Trusting their “leaders.” 


See also “The Riddle of Anti-Semitism” 

—————–The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism

—————- The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit