Alex Newman – Covid Hoax is UN Agenda 2030


Globalist go-fer Maurice Strong uttered this insane nonsense in 2010. Now, do you understand the Covid Hoax? Every institution in society – government, business, media, education, law, education, church — has betrayed the public and now stands naked & discredited.  
Agenda 2030, touted as a solution to everything from poverty to global warming, is really a plan to empower a global governing body.


UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism  (Jan 4, 2016) by Alex Newman (abridged by
The United Nations and its mostly autocratic member regimes have big plans for your life, your children, your country, and your world. And those plans are not limited to the coercive “climate” agreement recently concluded in Paris.
While the establishment media in the United States was hyping ISIS, football, and of course “global warming,” virtually every national government/dictatorship on the planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York [Sept 25, 2015] to adopt a draconian 15-year master plan for the planet. 
Top globalists such as former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist, are celebrating the plan, which the summit unanimously “approved,” as the next “Great Leap Forward” — yes, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.
The master plan is comprised of 17 “Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) with 169 specific “targets” to be foisted on all of humanity — literally all of it, as the plan itself states explicitly. 
“As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind,” reads the UN manifesto, entitled Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
But if you love liberty, self-government, free markets, or the U.S. Constitution, you will almost certainly be wishing that the UN would leave you behind.

Officially dubbed “Agenda 2030,” the UN plot is aimed at “transforming” the world. The program is a follow-up to the last 15-year UN plan, the defunct “Millennium Development Goals,” or MDGs…


Perhaps the single most striking feature of Agenda 2030 is the practically undisguised roadmap to global socialism and corporatism/fascism. To begin with, consider the agenda’s Goal 10, which calls on the UN, national governments, and every person on Earth to “reduce inequality within and among countries.” 
To do that, the agreement continues, will “only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed.”…
 Governments must also seize control of the means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. 
“We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that “governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns …”

In plain English, the Agenda 2030 document is claiming that today’s “consumption and production” patterns are unsustainable, so we’ll need to get by with less. How much less? It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than that offered by the late
Maurice Strong, the recently deceased Canadian billionaire and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth Summit, in a pre-Earth Summit document: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class … involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and ‘convenience’ foods, ownership of motor vehicles, numerous electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning … expensive suburban housing … are not sustainable.”
In truth, such “lifestyles and consumption patterns” are sustainable, so long as the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the name of achieving “sustainability.”
The UN and the environmental lobby claim that we must get by with less because there are now too many people on the planet consuming too many resources. But this rationale for accepting UN-imposed scarcity is patently false.
Of course, the promoters of Agenda 2030 would claim that rather than impoverish us, the global regime they envision would take good care of us — through universal health coverage, for instance. One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring “healthy lives” and “well-being,” is: “Achieve universal health coverage,” including “vaccines for all.”
Universal access to “mental health,” along with “sexual and reproductive health-care services” — code words for abortion and contraception — are also included. All governments are expected to integrate such services into their “national strategies and programmes,” the agreement demands.RE-EDUCATION
But as important as targeting healthcare is to the globalist schemers, any plan for building international socialism would be lacking without also targeting the next generation with global-socialist propaganda. And so an entire goal of Agenda 2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are transformed into what the UN calls “agents of change,” ready to push forward the plan for the new global order.
“Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the agreement explains.
The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement.
“By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states.
Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population control, central planning, global governance, and more — the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.
“Sustainable” children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN misleadingly refers to as “education.”
In the UN document the word “education” alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new “green” and “sustainable” world order. The UN’s education agenda also puts sex “education” front and center.
“By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for family planning, information and education,” the document explains.
RelatedCommunist Goals Masquerade Under UN Sustainable Development Teacher Program

Martin Armstrong– COVID Fraud Will Not Stay Hidden Forever

“They bribed medical professionals to turn COVID into a national crisis, and even with all of the hype the death toll is only 0.028%.”


by Martin Armstrong


The medical profession has really bought into COVID because they got paid bonuses if the person had COVID. 

They were claiming that COVID was impacting minorities more, but failed to mention that if you did not have insurance and said you had COVID, the government paid 100% of all the medical expenses. They bribed medical professionals to turn COVID into a national crisis, and even with all of the hype the death toll is only 0.028%.

Now families are starting to demand investigations because their loved one was listed as dying of COVID when they were not. I have received emails from numerous people where their mother was in their 90s and dying of old age, went to the hospital for their final days, and suddenly died of COVID.

In Britain, many medical experts are now insisting that too many fatalities were being blamed on the virus. One funeral director has spoken out calling this “a national scandal,” according to the Daily Mail

In Britain, there are no reported flu cases, and in Canada reports of the flu are just a fraction of what they were.

The pervasive fraud has destroyed the world economy, set in motion food shortages, and has been exploited to end our basic human rights. 

They have wiped out the hospitality industry, ended the arts, and left many students so depressed and unable to learn remotely. 

There is a rising trend in suicides which are up by 60%. Meanwhile, we are witnessing a sharp drop in new COVID-19 cases, which is taking place in the US, Canada, as well as India. This is implying that much of the COVID issue has been manufactured by the press and corrupt individuals in the medical field.

Then we have the epitome of corruption in Dr. Anthony Fauci who will say anything to keep the COVID crisis going. He now says that because he is vaccinated, he can at last hug his daughter because she too is vaccinated. He has been unable to hug his daughter in a year, he claims. 

Now if you get the Gates’ vaccine, you will not have to socially distance from others who are vaccinated. This guy belongs in prison. He has lied so much and is in Schwab’s promotional videos touting the need for the Great Reset economically when he has no qualification on the subject.

We have lost so much because of this fraud and they have deeply terrorized people into wearing masks and being afraid to even socialize. The damage to society has been irreparable. People are starting to fight back.

Related- Armstrong – Trudeau Moves to Install Guaranteed Basic Income in CanadaThis will make millions dependent on the government and its Communist diktats


Written By Michael and Debi Pearl


Article is spot on, except for criticism of Hitler and Germany.

“Great article, home schooling and being courageous are so essential and in such short supply today. However, the Pearls are mistaken about Hitler, I’m afraid. Who taught us that Hitler was a bad man? It wasn’t the same media, schools, and tech companies who promote pornography, abortion, homosexuality, contraception, and this lockdown hoax, was it? YES, IT WAS. These information sources did not just start lying, they’ve been lying for over 100 years. So, while the Pearls are dead on about 90%, they are dead wrong about Hitler. They have been lied to by the media. I don’t have the four hours to thoroughly review all the lies we’ve been taught about Hitler, but this twelve hour documentary, “Europa, the Final Battle” will teach more about history in twelve hours than we all learned about history in twelve years of k-12. The Pearls are right about not conforming. Germany was stabbed in the back by Talmudic Jewish bankers after World War 1, whether the Holocaust happened or not is seriously debatable, and even if it did, Anthony Sutton showed the Talmudic Jews paid Hitler. They don’t care if they have to sacrifice their fellow Jews. Most Jews are not involved, but what is disturbing is how so many Christians are brainwashed to support the fraudulent Israel, WHICH STOLE LAND FROM CHRISTIANS AND ARABS, and don’t realize ZIONISM AND COMMUNISM ARE FUNDED BY THE SAME TALMUDIC JEWISH OWNERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE. What is so sad, is even a Jewish Rabbi said the first two laws Hitler made were to ban pornography and to ban interest and bankers, which sent the Talmudic Jews, who were behind both in Germany and are behind both in America, running like roaches out of Germany right to America to spread their filth. The Pearls don’t realize that worldwide Jewry declared war on Germany in response to Hitler stopping their money manipulation and their exploiting of the German people with pornography. The document is easily accessible online. We have all been brainwashed. Actually, Hitler restored the German economy to the best performance in its entire recorded History. Before you get indignant at me and start calling me an “anti-Semite” as we’ve all been trained to do since we were born to anyone who criticizes legitimate Jewish wrongdoing, Consider where you learned Hitler was a bad man? It was from the schools, media, aid tech companies, and similarly indoctrinated friends and family, that’s where. If we are honest about it. Who started ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, the Washington Post, the NY TIMES, and who controls 90% of the worlds media today? Talmudic Jews, that’s who, so, since the victors tell the story, that’s why we all nearly believe Hitler was a monster. He wasn’t. I’d be happy to debate this point with the Pearls or anyone else for that matter. If I’m wrong, I’d be happy to be corrected, but if I’m right, the truth will never be silenced.”

Fifty years ago when Mike and I first started teaching our children at home (illegal at the time), we met with resistance from friends, family, and later from the authorities. The primary objection of the professional class was best summed up by a midwestern judge who said, “We cannot allow children to be schooled in the home, for they will not fit into the modern world order.”

Public school is all about constrained conformity. Social engineers know they must indoctrinate the youth—condition them to conform to state-mandated norms. Homeschooled kids, for the most part, are trained to think critically and independently. The opposite of propagandized conformity is training a child to possess the character to think independently, to say no to the crowd when the crowd is going the wrong way, and to say no to authority when it is evil. This lack of conforming is an act of reflective rebellion and is vital to our democracy.

Without discernment it is easy to confuse the two: the one self-centered and automatic, and the other a thoughtful compassion for others with a resolve to act as the situation requires.

Reflective rebellion is a character trait that must be instilled in one’s youth. It is rebellion born of reflecting upon the deep issues and responding with thoughtful deliberation. It doesn’t come naturally. Over time, as the Bible and prayer were taken from public school and discussion of God was deemed unacceptable and offensive speech, children lost the ability to reflect upon great moral principles that might lead to rebellion against the status quo. That most obvious deterioration of moral fiber in the public arena is what prompted parents to fight for the right to educate their children at home. These first pioneers wanted their children to know how to make wise decisions, lead their lives based on compassion and fundamental truths, and not be moved by the consensus of those around them. Homeschooling was a movement of God. These first homeschooling parents might not have been able to articulate their motivation at that time, but they were moved by God to instill in their children the ability to stand alone, if need be, in righteous rebellion against the sliding moral scale of relativism.

Fast forward to 2021. It is obvious that worldwide conformity is vital to the new world that is quickly closing in on us: “Step in line and remain 6 feet apart, adjust your mask, roll up your baby’s sleeve for this mandatory vaccination, you are not allowed to go to church, you can’t fly to Kauai without a vaccination, you have no right to question the vote . . .” etc. Wait! Before you yell, “AMEN! Let’s demand our rights,” I want you to know that not all conformity is evil, and to rebel when it is not wise is simply a selfish human response rooted in pride.

In this new world it is vital that we as believers understand there are two forms of rebellion: one is reflective, and the other is reactive. We define reflective as rooted in wise reflection, whereas reactive rebellion is an automatic reflex action to things not going our way. It is the carnal, human response when someone takes away our rights.

“Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
~Winston Churchill

The History teacher

The history of Hitler’s reign is fresh for me since I was born shortly after he was crushed by my father and his fellow warriors. I grew up hearing firsthand accounts of the extreme evils of the death camps. It is interesting to note that when the atrocities were being committed, no one here in America could believe it was happening. Readers’ Digest magazines from the 1930s and ’40s (I have read all of them) treated the news filtering out of Germany as vile rumors, purporting that no human would do such a thing as to actually gather up innocent families and take them to camps to be burned. The magazine editorial staff was firm in their stand that no one would cooperate with a government that did such a thing. It is an interesting side note that all during those same years Reader’s Digest’s editors were 100% behind the Arab people in the Middle East and wrote with extremely negative tones concerning the suffering Jews wanting to return to their homeland. But popular opinion—which was written as unquestionable truth—was wrong.

Now we know that the German soldiers did what they were told to do in sync with their fellows; they went along with the flow regardless of which way the flow was going. Christian men who went to church on Sunday and had wives and children of their own put guns to the heads of women and children and blew their brains out time and time again by the hundreds of thousands. No reflection as to right or wrong, no compassion, no godly rebellion. They did as they were ordered. History teaches us more: they simply did what their comrades were doing. Their pastors told them that a good Christian patriot obeys those whom God has placed in authority over them.

After World War II’s atrocities were revealed, people tried to make sense of the existence of such evil by saying the soldiers were doing what they were commanded to do because they were afraid for their own lives. But REAL history tells a different story. The soldiers who ran the death camps were given the opportunity to take a different role in the war: they could relocate at any time they chose, but most chose to continue their art of butchery—inventing new ways to get off on administering cruel death. These soldiers had been trained into conformity. It has been said that not knowing history condemns us to repeat it.

Classic Profile of Human Nature

I hear the protest: “But we are a Christian nation and times have changed.” In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted an experiment that would become a classic psychological profile of human nature. His research focused on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He was performing this experiment in hope of finding answers concerning the Jewish genocide. Stanley Milgram wanted to see if volunteers would exercise compassionate, reflective rebellion or if they would bow down to authority even when they knew it was wrong. Milgram advertised in the newspaper for 40 men to be a part of his research. These men were duped into thinking they were going to be part of an experiment designed to see how punishment affects memory and learning ability. Each volunteer would play the role of a teacher. They thought the person playing the part of the learner was also a volunteer, but that part was played by an actor. The volunteer teacher watched as the learner was strapped into an electrically wired chair; then the teacher was taken into the adjacent room where he could not see the other man strapped into the chair.

The teacher was shown how to use the dials to impart various degrees of electrical shock to the learner if he failed to recall the list of words that had previously been given to him. With each missed answer, the teacher (volunteer) would administer an increasing intensity of electrical shock—or so he was led to believe. Although the teacher could not see his victim, he did hear a loud protest at the first shock and thus assumed that he was imparting pain. With the second turn of the shock knob, the learner (actor) could be heard begging and pleading for the teacher to stop the shocks. Most of the teachers hesitated when they heard the screams of pain: “This is wrong. I don’t want to do this.” But the professional researcher, speaking with authority, emphatically said, “The experiment requires that you continue.”

What is disheartening about the results of this experiment is that every teacher continued to do as he was told, sending shock after shock regardless of the screams of protest. This awful experiment found that even after the learner had fallen totally silent, which would have indicated to the teacher that the other volunteer had fallen unconscious or worse, 65% of the participants continued to administer shocks until the end of the experiment.

Nothing has changed. When I read the Milgram Study my mind went immediately to the issue of abortion. I stagger at the thought of civilized professionals—doctors, nurses, etc.—cutting a living, full-sized baby into pieces and pulling out the beating heart to use in an experiment, and then harvesting the cells to manufacture vaccines. We are indeed a fallen, evil people, and neither time, education, nor religion has changed our hearts.

One Among 1000

Just this week I was watching a TED talk by Dr. Justin Coulson. In this talk Dr. Coulson told of an opportunity he had some years ago to speak to a group of 1200 teenage students with the goal of helping the teens understand the difference between automatic reactive rebellion—“I want my way”—and reflective rebellion rooted in compassion and justice. Dr. Coulson’s goal was to teach the students that bowing down to the god of popular opinion was, in fact, an act of showing they were not practicing reflective, compassionate rebellion. For his presentation he chose to create a simplified version of the 1963 Milgram experiment.

Dr. Coulson’s slightly more humane object lesson called for two volunteers. He explained one would play the part of a teacher and the other a learner. He had 6 groups of 200 teens each hour. At the first session he told the teacher volunteer, “Here are the five trivia questions that you will ask this other volunteer who will be your student.”

To the learner volunteer he explained that they would be required to put elastic bands on their wrist so that when they missed a question the teacher could pop them. He told them, “Five trivia questions and five potential punishments.” I do hope he wished them well.

The first set of teens did exactly as they were told. The kid playing teacher popped the poor victim learner for every question missed. Some of the questions were too hard to be answered by the kids, so it was a given that the learner would be punished. The audience obviously enjoyed the whole routine, including seeing the discomfort of the learners. No sign of reflective rebellion was shown, so Dr. Coulson had to teach each group of teens what they SHOULD have felt for something so unjust. The second group of 200 kids filed in and did the same experiment with the same results. In the third group, a big guy, 14 years old, was playing the teacher. The one playing the student was a small girl of the same age. She missed the first question. Just like all who had gone before, the young man lifted her small wrist and pulled back the 4 elastic bands about 6 inches. She turned her face away and flinched as she awaited her punishment. In that instant the teenage boy paused. As gently as possible he slowly eased the elastic bands down and lowered her wrist. He turned to Dr. Coulson and quietly said, “No, I will not hurt her for simply missing the question.”

Dr Coulson pressed the young man, reminding him that he had agreed to follow through with the experiment. He was told that the program could not continue unless he did his part. But the young man stood his ground, “No, it is not right, and I will not do it.” Some in the crowd began to jeer and yell, “Just do it, you dope . . . pop her!” He remained firm even as the crowd began to boo him.

It was the moment Dr. Coulson had hoped for. Finally someone had enough moral fortitude to show reflective rebellion against a huge crowd of jeering peers.

Reflective rebellion is characterized by deep thought, whereas reactive rebellion is an emotional reaction founded in self-interest.

Dr. Coulson turned to the crowd and told them, “Why do you jeer someone whom you KNOW is choosing to do what we all know is right for our fellow student? You should be applauding him for being willing to stand for justice. He is the first person that didn’t go with the flow. He stood against the whole crowd. He was not moved by jeering or booing but by compassion. What this young man has demonstrated is reflective rebellion, and it is what everyone should strive to have.”

Augustine of Hippo said: “Right is right even if no one is doing it. Wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it.”

The End Game

This is the end game for all of us. As adults we need to step back and ask ourselves, “Have we been practicing reflective, compassionate rebellion or just reactive rebellion?”

Instilling reflective rebellion should be the goal of every parent: to train their children regardless of the pressure, the sacrifice, or fear to do what is right for the other person, to have compassion, think of others rather than just demanding rights. To train our children to not be under the spell of their peers or even people in authority but to think and act by what they know is godly.

All of us want to raise children that are strong, independent, caring, and courageous. Yet so often we say to our children, “Do as I say because it is the rule of this house.” Or it is common to hear, “Because I said so.” In public schools it has been the norm to expect kids to conform to all rules even when they know the teacher is not being respectful of righteous norms. At home it is often the same. It is easier to maintain control of a group—or a family—if you subjugate their conscience to power, but it is not the kind of control we want for our children or our nation.

As a parent you create your reflective rebels by referencing the lessons of history and by giving them hypotheticals. When you are in the car, ask them, “What do you think about this? What would you do in that situation? Should we go along with what they require, or should we stand against it? Could our rebellion cause someone fear, or worse? What is the more compassionate thing?” Or concerning politics say, “Why do you think that person should get our vote? Do you think this policy is correct or will it cause trouble in the future? Is it possible that there is information we simply don’t know that would greatly change how we feel about this?” We also create our reflective rebels by what they see us say or do.

For the last several years we have been hearing of families losing their children due to homeschooling, and the news reports make the parents look evil. Mike and I have also been victims of false news reports, so we KNOW how leftist media can make good appear evil and evil appear good. When we hear that the courts have removed children from a home for homeschooling or not being vaccinated, do we stand with them? These type of situations will soon be a daily occurrence as the powers that be go after homeschoolers one at a time. Will you be a LOUD voice in times like this? This is what reflective rebellion is all about.


In this new world, we make decisions concerning our basic freedoms and rights. Some of those decisions will be life-altering. Many of us will waste our peace on reacting in a rebellious manner to things of no consequence. Some of these same folks will see people facing real moral challenges yet tuck their tail and go along with status quo because they don’t want to bring attention to themselves, and they will justify their passivity with misapplied scripture. But a few will use common sense and wisdom to know when to take a stand and when to cooperate with the system.

Wisdom enables us know how and when it is time to respond in rebellion. It is very possible that the time will come when those in local authority—cities, counties, and states, and maybe even our military—will have to make wise decisions that will be in total disobedience to higher authority. We all need to seek the wisdom of Solomon before such weighty decisions are forced upon us. History teaches us that unless we are armed with truth and holy resolve we could be among the thousands who just go with the flow rather than be the ones who stand in rebellion against evil.

“Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore… (Ephesians 6:13-14a)

The questions we need to keep ever before us are: What is righteous and what is evil? Where do I draw the line? Being a rebel has no merit before God or man unless it is selfless unto righteousness, so wisdom is imperative.

As the world marches closer and closer to the end times, we need to be armed with the understanding that there will be times in our lives when health, happiness, and well-being are not the end game. It is important that we understand the difference between a foolish stand of rebellion and a reflective, compassionate, honorable rebellion. Practicing automatic, self-centered rebellion as if it were godly rebellion dilutes, confuses, and blends the two, which weakens resolve. In times when great resolve and action are needed, this distinguishing between the two is essential.

Be one of those rare souls who are reflectively rebellious. Train your children to stand tall in the moral war that is now upon us.

Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.
Proverbs 22:6

Stand Tall in the Moral War