Basic information to restore America.

Your  help to support the destruction of the lying media, which has been indoctrinating America with the ideology of our Invisible Government for well over a century.  By paying $1-$5 monthly, for a subscription you can help support the best news that America desperately needs.  News that is Constitutionally, Biblically, and historically centered and accurate.  Thank you!  Once there are 1,000 to 5,000 subscribers, the site will become full time.

At the bottom of this page is a library of pdf’s and other titles, such as classics for children and adults.  It is slowly daily expanding and has the literature which has contributed greatly to an improved mankind and children throughout history.

Guest posts are welcome.  Email messanoinsurance@outlook.com, and it will be reviewed for posting. It would be nice to have news correspondents from around America, to get the real news out, instead of relying on the corrupt media.

 

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth, shall set you free”

Jesus Christ

“To Write is to wage War”

Voltaire

The Drug And Medical System cannot bear examination. To explain it would be to destroy it, and to defend it even is to damage it.”—R.T. Trall M.D.

“No matter how paranoid you are, what they are actually doing is far worse than you can imagine”

Ralph Gleason

“A single lie destroys a whole reputation for integrity”

Baltasar Gracian

“We will know our disinformation program is complete When everything the American public believes is false”

William Casey

 

”Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave”

Frederick Douglas

“Fear always works to influence the population, when the population is uneducated”

“The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny lies in keeping them ignorant”

Robespierre

All quotes from the brilliant Whale.to website.

Lovethetruth is another great website.

There is a PDF library of 300+ books which are going to all be posted on the bottom of this page.  It will detail the massive and overwhelming, incontrovertible and indisputable evidence of who is behind the race tensions, the Federal Reserve, Communism, and virus h

 

This Coronavirus is a massive hoax, designed to create panic and pandemonium and to give wealth and power to the elite.

Have learned that both sides are compromised.  The Democrat party has been controlled by globalist bankers since 1912, when they funded Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt for President, with Wilson winning  the White House with 40% of the vote, while Taft and Teddy Roosevelt split the remaining 60%.

The Council on Foreign Relations has controlled both sides presidential candidates since Wilson, with the possible, but increasingly doubtful, exceptions of Reagan and Trump.  Both are hardly staunch Christians, and are the first two American Presidents who have been divorced.  Of course, Obama is the first to have been credibly accused of homosexuality.

America must wake up.  We must leave these political parties, as both are controlled by globalist bankers, who also control our media, schools, tech companies, WHO, China, and the U.N.

The globalist bankers have engineered America’s entry into every war since and including World War 1.  Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, The Gulf of Tonkin, and 9/11 were all planned by globalist bankers, with their fake media spreading disinformation  and propaganda to deceive naive and gullible Americans.  Of course, one will be called a conspiracy theory for saying this, or, the globalist bankers media favorite defense, “Fascist”, “Nazi”, or “Anti-Semite”.

Where did the term “conspiracy theory” originate.

 

A declassified 1967 CIA memo issued during the Kennedy assassination Warren Commission investigation showed that the CIA engaged in a PsyOp to discredit and ridicule critics of a the Warren report. They weaponized the term “conspiracy theorists” to shut down all inquiries and legitimate questions about dubious official narratives . It was a coordinated propaganda campaign to discredit and ridicule critics that has continued to this very day.

The memo (document number 1035-960) was titled: Countering Criticism of the Warren Report

It’s Classification: PSYCH for Psychological Operation and CS for Clandestine Services

It contained the special Note: “Destroy When No Longer Needed”

It detailed instructions to use “friendly” elite politicians and people embedded in major news outlets by attacking the conspiracy theorists themselves, as opposed to their actual claims, and explaining that “large scale conspiracies” are impossible. In the 1960s, the CIA owned over 250 media outlets. It directed its members to “ employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”

Since then, the label “conspiracy theorist” has become a disciplinary device that has been very effective in making sure that certain events off are always off limits to inquiry or debate. Any (honest) law enforcement officer will tell you that conspiracies can and do happen every day, all day long.

If they are calling you a conspiracy theorist, then chances are you are over or near the target.

 

Please register as an Independent.  There is zero reason to register as a Democrat.  Every single idea on the Democrat platform is a massive lie, but it’s complicated, because it takes hours to explain each lie, and there are so many, it takes at least an uninterrupted week to get through them all, for just one voter. Since Democrats control the media, schools, and tech companies, and most people are desperately busy, trying to keep a roof over their head, and food on their table, almost no one has the time it takes to learn how wicked, deceitful, and evil the Democrats are.

This site, allows you to decompress from the Democrat lie bubble, and to return to sanity, slowly.

Solano County, like all Democrat counties, is badly brainwashed.

Just visited Cheyenne, Wyoming, a truly beautiful city.  Wyoming has a population of 577,000, and had 13 total murders in 2019.  Contrast that with my Democrat rathole city of Vallejo, with a population of 120,000, and 22 total murders this year, with the year not even over!!  It’s on pace for a record setting 30+ murders.  Why?  Three major reasons, among many  appear. Wyoming has open carry, California and Democrat states don’t.  They are run by tyrants who are terrified of an armed population rising and throwing off their tyranny.  Wyoming has no state income tax, California is one of the most taxed and regulated states in America.  These taxes and regulations are not for the common man at all, they are to keep the elite tyrants in power.  Lastly, Wyoming severely bans pot, while California stupidly legalized it in the last decade.

4/16/20 Update: Register as an independent.  The Republican Party is infiltrated too!  I just had my comments criticizing the greedy, covetous, and thieving J*wish bankers, who’ve been stealing from America since they established the Federal Reserve in 1913 (The first time in American history, Americans didn’t control their own money), deleted from the allegedly conservative sites PJMedia, and FrontpageMag.  Have been kicked out of my local Solano County Republican Party for criticizing homosexuality too.  The Republican Party is a front.

Please read for yourself the testimony of the American raised well educated widow, of a Russian military officer (He was brutally murdered in the Bolshevik Revolution) detailing clearly the unmistakable proof that the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, is not a fake or anti-Semitic at all, but rather, it’s the exact blueprint the Bolsheviks used, and the blueprint being brought to America right now, to completely enslave us.

It’s in the book: “Waters flowing Eastward”.  

Also, it’s wise to be wary of Trump.  When he appointed Richard Grenell as the head of the 17 intelligence agencies, who is an open homosexual, he sent a clear signal that America’s Christians are not his first priority, and neither is God.  We already know that every single president since Woodrow Wilson was controlled by these globalist bankers, with the possible exceptions of Reagan and Trump, and, its looking likely, 80% at least, that Reagan and Trump were controlled too.  Trumps administration is full of CFR members, who are a front for the globalist bankers, Ivanka Trump dated a Rothschild, and Trump’s Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross, is a Rothschild agent.

Please also join ChristianMilitia co-founded by myself and Founded by Jerry Quintana.

However, the best websites for news I’ve come across are as follows.  Keep in mind, monitor the conservative websites for a heavy globalist banker influence.  There is a lot wrong with globalist  bankers, Freemasons, and Illuminati controlling the liberal and conservative media with their puppets, and gaming the people of America for their own power and profits.  There is a massive infiltration of the conservative media by globalist bankers.  And, when it comes to standing on the Constitution and the Bible, these bankers are nowhere to be found, AND, these conservative banker controlled media types  will viciously decry any condemnation of the wealthy bankers behind this scam.

Most of us Christians, studying the Old Testament, love Jews.  Nothing wrong with that.  However we are to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves.  Don’t think Talmud obeying Jews share the same love for Christians, because few do.  The term anti-Semite used to mean those who hate Jews, now it means one who the Jewish globalist bankers hate.

A great book is Eustace Mullins “The  Curse of Canaan”.

The  globalist bankers, who control the Federal Reserve, are the biggest thieves, murderers, and liars in human history, violating the Commandment “Thou shalt not steal”, every day for the past 107 years.  They all deserve the death penalty.

Never in human history have so few stolen from so many, which  is why they are so intent on spying on us.

 

The globalist bankers behind the Federal Reserve are the enemies of mankind.

The Unz Review

Henry Makow

Organic Prepper

NaturalNews

Allnewspipeline

The  Burning Platform

American Greatness

Epoch Times (Very astute, but they hold China responsible for Communism, not the Globalist bankers)

Liberty Nation

American Thinker (Strongly pro-Israel)

PJ Media (Strongly pro-Israel)

Conservative Review (Strongly pro-Israel)

Communities Digital News.

Whatfinger.com

IOTW Report

Town Hall (Strongly pro-Israel)

National Review

The Washington Examiner

The Washington Times

Newsmax

The Revolutionary Act

PatriotRetort.com

Spartareport.com

Canadafreepress.com

RenewAmerica.com

So, the reader can go to these sites and find the links I post daily.  However, there is a method I use and a stance that determines what article’s I post.  Please read and share ASAP! 90% of Democrat voters have never read 7 conservative news websites for just 2  months of their entire lives. They have never  honestly examined both sides.

 

Additionally, among the leftist news sites to avoid, as they are continuously lying to the public, either lying by omission or commission, are as follows, and this list is certainly not comprehensive (Unless you enjoy being deceived and hoodwinked daily, avoid these sites, television channels, and newspapers like the plague, and, since sharing is caring, warn your friends and family as well):

Googlenews.com

Yahoonews.com

WND.com  (Strong Pro Israel content)  its appearing increasingly likely to me that Zionism and Communism/Bolshevism had the same forces behind them.  ( Just blocked for life on WND for criticizing Talmudic bankers who are behind Communism and who own the Federal Reserve on 9/17/2020)

 

Breitbart (censors comments critical of moral issues and of the globallst bankers and Talmud).  I was banned for life on Breitbart, 6/1/20.  They pretend they are conservative, but they are only controlled opposition.  

Daily Mail

Daily Wire.  Ben Shapiro goes to universities nationwide to preach about free speech but censors comments on his site. (Was blocked for life on WND, then reinstated.  Still have comments deleted)

CNN.com

The Guardian

Front Page Mag (Censors conservatives)

USA Today

NYPost.com  (Conservative, but risque, and has no virtue standards)

Reuters

ABC.com

Newsweek.com

NBC.com

MSNBC.com

Vallejo Times Herald

San Jose Mercury News

East Bay Times

San Francisco Chronicle

Sacramento Bee

Los Angeles Times

City Journal (Censors Christian Constitutionalists)

PBS

NPR

HuffingtonPost.com

DailyBeast.com

New York Times

Washington Post

TheAtlantic.com

BBC.com

Buzzfeed.com

CBSnews.com

FoxNews.com  (Conservative, but has no idea about virtue and wisdom)

Drudgereport.com (Has many salacious links, and favors morally reprehensible ideas, viciously attacks anyone who opposes the abomination of homosexuality)

MotherJones.com

Time.com

People.com

Salon.com

The New Republic.com

Slate.com

VanityFair.com

TMZ.com

New Yorker.com

The Gateway Pundit (purports to be conservative, but bans commenters critical of homosexuality)

Politico.com

Radaronline.com

NY Daily News.

CNBC.com

Christian Science Monitor

Rolling Stone

Lastly, nearly every single local newspaper in America is compromised by the left, and if you watch television for your  news you are deceived, uninformed, and/or under informed.

 

 

 

Please join the NewCaliforniaState movement!!  California is run by corrupt Democrats, including Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris!!  Until California gets rid of Democrat politicians we will never recover from being the poorest state in America, with 20% of our population living below the poverty level, and having 12% of the nation’s population,  36% of the nation’s welfare recipients, and nearly 50% of the nation’s homeless.  Los Angeles has nearly 19% of all the homeless in America.

Please join Natural Family Foundation led by Jim Harrison, which advocates a return to the family structure.  Since it was marriage and the church that were the two sacred backbones of America, this organization is extremely important, and Jim Harrison is a tireless supporter of liberty, virtue, and an amazing networker

Islam is a rapidly growing threat, and please join Larry Richardson of South Carolina’s organization STAB (Sound the Alarm Brigade).

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are not a racist Forgery, all of it occurred in the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.  

World War 2 was a massive hoax.  

 

There are two fantastic books on America and on the threat from Marxism that I highly recommend.

Skousen: The 5,000 year Leap.

Skousen: The Naked Communist.

Another great book details how the Federal Reserve has pillaged America of trillions of dollars.

The Creature from Jekyll Island

Another great book details how the Council on Foreign relations has been sabotaging America for over a century.

The Killing of Uncle Sam

Another great overview of how the Illuminati and Council on Foreign Relations has been trying to destroy America, for over two centuries, is here by Myron Fagan.

 

 

There is a fabulous video by a woman who wrote a book on the Dumbing down of America in our schools, Charlotte Iserbyt.  The book is nearly $200, used, so watching the video is better.  It is in Part 1 and Part 2.

Another great overview of how schools have been sabotaged in the past 150 years, and how is responsible is a 12 part series from Alex Newman, author of ‘Crimes of the Educators‘, in the Epoch Times.

1)The Genesis of Public Schools: Collectivism and Failure

2)How Horace Mann Worked to Destroy Traditional Education—and America

3) How John Dewey Used Public ‘Education’ to Subvert Liberty

4) Dewey’s Public Schools Replaced Christianity With Collectivist Humanism

5) Socialists Used Public Schools to Destroy Literacy in America

6) Frankfurt School Weaponized US Education Against Civilization

7) Big Foundations Unleashed Collectivist ‘Revolution’ via US Schools

8) How Socialists Used Teachers Unions Such as the NEA to Destroy Education

9) UNESCO: Indoctrinating Humanity With Collectivist ‘Education’

10) The Rise of ‘Fed Ed’ Sped Up the Demise of Real Education

11) Common Core, Still in Place, Nationalized Educational Quackery

12) Big Brother Schools Using Big Data to Manipulate and Spy on Kids

 

There is a fabulous website by Lori Alexander, on what Godly womanhood looks like.

The Transformed Wife

Another great website details the terrible effects of our societies attacks on men.

Real Sexism

to understand how corrupt both political parties in America are, read the 1903 book, “Confessions of a Monopolist” by Frederick Howe.  Enlightening.

Also, every last Founder of America knew the KJV Bible very well, and it’s a sad testament that few Americans do.  90% of Christians know their hellivisions more than their Bibles.   This means most Americans have no idea about the dangers of Islam, (also Here and Here), the dangers of porn, the dangers of weed,  or the dangers of television.

Virtue is a must in a nation that has freedom and liberty, and if we do not uphold virtue in private, when no one is watching, we will soon be slaves in public, when everyone is watching.  One cannot be a slave to self in private, and long remain free in public.  It is a violation of the laws of nature.

Before we continue, let us review a blatant absence of virtue, in Martin Luther King Jr.  Our government hid incriminating records on him, that won’t be released  until 2027, detailing 40 documented affairs, and his laughing as a fellow pastor raped a woman in his congregation in his presence. 

Four free habits that will transform your life for the better in 3 years, and which, if every American will do, will transform America in 3 years.

1) Get rid of television, and do not watch it at all.  No longer watch movies.  This will give you plenty of time for worthy pursuits.

2) Avoid ALL psychotropic drugs.  The mind is a paradise.  If you don’t have mental peace, hang around people who do, or read books by people who did.

3) Avoid pornography like the plague.  Avoid ALL sex outside of marriage.

4) Read widely of the Classics, the Bible, and history.  If you don’t already have a personal library at home, start one.  Having at least 20 history books in your home should be something every American does.

Very truly yours,

 

Ryan

“[V]irtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government.”
George Washington

“Can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue? ”
George Washington

“[T]here is no truth more thoroughly established, than that there exists . . . an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness.”
George Washington

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness — these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles.”
George Washington

“The aggregate happiness of the society, which is best promoted by the practice of a virtuous policy, is, or ought to be, the end of all government . . . .”
George Washington

“Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people. The general government . . . can never be in danger of degenerating into a monarchy, an oligarchy, an aristocracy, or any despotic or oppresive form so long as there is any virtue in the body of the people.”
George Washington

“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”
Benjamin Franklin

“Laws without morals are in vain.”
Benjamin Franklin (Motto of the University of Pennsylvania)

“Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power.”
Benjamin Franklin

“A nation as a society forms a moral person, and every member of it is personally responsible for his society.”
Thomas Jefferson

“No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and . . . . their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice . . . . These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.”
Thomas Jefferson

“It is in the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigour. . . . degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats into the heart of its laws and constitution.”
Thomas Jefferson

“[In a republic, according to Montesquieu in Spirit of the Laws, IV,ch.5,] ‘virtue may be defined as the love of the laws and of our country. As such love requires a constant preference of public to private interest, it is the source of all private virtue; for they are nothing more than this very preference itself… Now a government is like everything else: to preserve it we must love it . . . Everything, therefore, depends on establishing this love in a republic; and to inspire it ought to be the principal business of education; but the surest way of instilling it into children is for parents to set them an example.'”
Thomas Jefferson: copied into his Commonplace Book.

“When virtue is banished, ambition invades the minds of those who are disposed to receive it, and avarice possesses the whole community.”
Montesquieu (written by Thomas Jefferson in his Common Place Book).

“Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.”
Thomas Jefferson

“Liberty . . . is the great parent of science and of virtue; and . . . a nation will be great in both always in proportion as it is free.”
Thomas Jefferson

“The order of nature [is] that individual happiness shall be inseparable from the practice of virtue.”
Thomas Jefferson

“Without virtue, happiness cannot be.”
Thomas Jefferson

“The institution of delegated power implies that there is a portion of virtue and honor among mankind which may be a reasonable foundation of confidence.”
Alexander Hamilton

“To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea.”
James Madison

“The aim of every political Constitution, is or ought to be first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
James Madison

“. . . Virtue, morality, and religion. This is the armor, my friend, and this alone that renders us invincible. These are the tactics we should study. If we lose these, we are conquered, fallen indeed . . . so long as our manners and principles remain sound, there is no danger.”
Patrick Henry

“Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.”
Patrick Henry

“The only foundation of a free Constitution, is pure Virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People, in a great Measure, than they have it now. They may change their Rulers, and the forms of Government, but they will not obtain a lasting Liberty.
John Adams

“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net.”
John Adams

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
John Adams

“Liberty can no more exist without virtue and independence than the body can live and move without a soul.”
John Adams

“Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics.”
John Adams

“[I]t is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue.”
John Adams

“The laws of man may bind him in chains or may put him to death, but they never can make him wise, virtuous, or happy.”
John Adams

“Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone, which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free Constitution is pure virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People in a greater Measure than they have it now, they may change their rulers and the forms of government, but they will not obtain a lasting liberty.”
John Adams

“Honor is truly sacred, but holds a lower rank in the scale of moral excellence than virtue. Indeed the former is part of the latter, and consequently has not equal pretensions to support a frame of government productive of human happiness.”
John Adams

“Human nature itself is evermore an advocate for liberty. There is also in human nature a resentment of injury, and indignation against wrong. A love of truth and a veneration of virtue. These amiable passions, are the “latent spark”… If the people are capable of understanding, seeing and feeling the differences between true and false, right and wrong, virtue and vice, to what better principle can the friends of mankind apply than to the sense of this difference?”
John Adams

“Our liberty depends on our education, our laws, and habits . . . it is founded on morals and religion, whose authority reigns in the heart, and on the influence all these produce on public opinion before that opinion governs rulers.”
Fisher Ames

“It is certainly true that a popular government cannot flourish without virtue in the people.”
Richard Henry Lee

“Whenever we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.”
Thomas Paine

“[N]either the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen onto any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man.”
Samuel Adams

“The diminution of public virtue is usually attended with that of public happiness, and the public liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals.”
Samuel Adams

“[M]en will be free no longer then while they remain virtuous.”
Samuel Adams

“If virtue & knowledge are diffused among the people, they will never be enslav’d. This will be their great security.”
Samuel Adams

“No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.”
Samuel Adams

“A general dissolution of the principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy…. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but once they lose their virtue, they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader…. If virtue and knowledge are diffused among the people, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great security.”
Samuel Adams

“No people can be great who have ceased to be virtuous.”
Samuel Johnson

“No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people, but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality and virtue, and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.”
George Mason

“[A] free government . . . cannot be supported without Virtue.”
Samuel Williams

“In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Regard not the particular sect or denomination of the candidate — look at his character. It is alleged by men of loose principles, or defective views of the subject, that religion and morality are not necessary or important qualifications for political stations. But the scriptures teach a different doctrine. They direct that rulers should be men who rule in the fear of God, men of truth, hating covetousness. It is to the neglect of this rule that we must ascribe the multiplied frauds, breaches of trust, speculations and embezzlements of public property which astonish even ourselves; which tarnish the character of our country and which disgrace our government. When a citizen gives his vote to a man of known immorality, he abuses his civic responsibility; he not only sacrifices his own responsibility; he sacrifices not only his own interest, but that of his neighbor; he betrays the interest of his country.”
Noah Webster

“…if the citizens neglect their Duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted; laws will be made, not for the public good so much as for selfish or local purposes; corrupt or incompetent men will be appointed to execute the Laws; the public revenues will be squandered on unworthy men; and the rights of the citizen will be violated or disregarded.”
Noah Webster

“Let a man’s zeal, profession, or even principles as to political measures be what they will, if he is without personal integrity and private virtue, as a man he is not to be trusted.”
John Witherspoon

“… the manners of the people in general are of the utmost moment to the stability of any civil society. When the body of a people are altogether corrupt in their manners, the government is ripe for dissolution.”
John Witherspoon

“So true is this, that civil liberty cannot be long preserved without virtue.”
John Witherspoon

“… but a republic once equally poised, must either preserve its virtue or lose its liberty, and by some tumultuous revolution, either return to its first principles, or assume a more unhappy form.”
John Witherspoon

“A country cannot subsist well without liberty, nor liberty without virtue.”
Jean Jacques Rousseau

“Machiavel, discoursing on these matters, finds virtue to be so essentially necessary to the establishment and preservation of liberty, that he thinks it impossible for a corrupted people to set up a good government, or for a tyranny to be introduced if they be virtuous; and makes this conclusion, ‘That where the matter (that is, the body of the people) is not corrupted, tumults and disorders do not hurt; and where it is corrupted, good laws do no good:’ which being confirmed by reason and experience, I think no wise man has ever contradicted him.”
Algernon Sidney

“[L]iberty cannot be preserved, if the manners of the people are corrupted . . .”
Algernon Sidney

“[A]ll popular and well-mixed governments [republics] . . . are ever established by wise and good men, and can never be upheld otherwise than by virtue: The worst men always conspiring against them, they must fall, if the best have not power to preserve them. . . . [and] unless they be preserved in a great measure free from vices . . . .”
Algernon Sidney

“Fruits are always of the same nature with the seeds and roots from which they come, and trees are known by the fruits they bear: as a man begets a man, and a beast a beast, that society of men which constitutes a government upon the foundation of justice, virtue, and the common good, will always have men to promote those ends; and that which intends the advancement of one man’s desire and vanity, will abound in those that will foment them.”
Algernon Sidney

“[I]f vice and corruption prevail, liberty cannot subsist; but if virtue have the advantage, arbitrary power cannot be established.”
Algernon Sidney

“If the public safety be provided, liberty and propriety secured, justice administered, virtue encouraged, vice suppressed, and the true interest of the nation advanced, the ends of government are accomplished . . .”
Algernon Sidney

“[L]iberty without virtue would be no blessing to us.”
Benjamin Rush

“Without virtue there can be no liberty.”
Benjamin Rush

“The only foundation for… a republic is to be laid in Religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments.”
Benjamin Rush

“No free government can stand without virtue in the people, and a lofty spirit of partiotism.”
Andrew Jackson

“Lastly, our ancestors established their system of government on morality and religious sentiment. Moral habits, they believed, cannot safely be on any other foundation than religious principle, nor any government be secure which is not supported by moral habits.”
Daniel Webster

“[I]f we and our posterity reject religious instruction and authority, violate the rules of eternal justice, trifle with the injunctions of morality, and recklessly destroy the political constitution which holds us together, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us, that shall bury all our glory in profound obscurity.”
Daniel Webster

“Liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith.”
Horace Greely

“What is liberty without wisdom and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness, without tuition or restraint.”
Edmund Burke

“Among a people generally corrupt liberty cannot long exist.”
Edmund Burke

“Manners are of more importance than laws. Upon them in great measure the laws depend. The law touches us but here and there, and now and then. Manners are what vex and smooth, corrupt or purify, exalt or debase, barbarize or refine us, by a constant, steady, uniform, insensible operation, like that of the air we breathe in. They give their whole form and color to our lives. According to their quality, they aid morals, they support them, or they totally destroy them.”
Edmund Burke

“It is better to cherish virtue and humanity, by leaving much to free will, even with some loss of the object , than to attempt to make men mere machines and instruments of political benevolence. The world on the whole will gain by a liberty, without which virtue cannot exist.”
Edmund Burke

“Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their appetites; in proportion as their love of justice is above their rapacity; in proportion as their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumption; in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsel of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”
Edmund Burke

“Among a people generally corrupt liberty cannot long exist.”
Edmund Burke

“[T]he very best forms of government are vain without public virtue . . . .”
William A. Cocke

“No polity can be devised which shall perpetuate freedom among a people that are dead to honor and integrity. Liberty and virtue are twin sisters, and the best fabric in the world . . . .”
James H. Thornwell

“[P]erfect freedom consists in obeying the dictates of right reason, and submitting to natural law. When a man goes beyond or contrary to the law of nature and reason, he . . . introduces confusion and disorder into society . . . [thus] where licentiousness begins, liberty ends.”
Samuel West

“When was public virtue to be found when private was not?”
William Cowper

“The laws by which the Divine Ruler of the universe has decreed an indissoluble connection between public happiness and private virtue, whatever apparent exceptions may delude our short-sighted judgments, never fail to vindicate their supremacy and immutability.”
William Cabell Rives

“Unless virtue guide us our choice must be wrong.”
William Penn

“If men be good, government cannot be bad.”
William Penn

“Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them.”
Joseph Story

“The life of the nation is secure only while the nation is honest, truthful and virtuous.”
Frederick Douglas

“[R]eligion, morality and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall be forever encouraged.”
Northwest Ordinance of 1787

“I consider the domestic virtue of the Americans as the principle source of all their other qualities. It acts as a promoter of industry, as a stimulus to enterprise and as the most powerful restraint of public vice. . . . No government could be established on the same principle as that of the United States with a different code of morals.”
Francis Grund

“The American Constitution is remarkable for its simplicity; but it can only suffice a people habitually correct in their actions, and would be utterly inadequate to the wants of a different nation. Change the domestic habits of the Americans, their religious devotion, and their high respect for morality, and it will not be necessary to change a single letter in the Constitution in order to vary the whole form of their government.”
Francis Grund

“History fails to record a single precedent in which nations subject to moral decay have not passed into political and economic decline. There has been either a spiritual awakening to overcome the moral lapse, or a progressive deterioration leading to ultimate national disaster.”
Douglas MacArthur

“[Liberty] considers religion as the safeguard of morality, and morality as the best security of law and the surest pledge of the duration of freedom.”
Alexis de Tocqueville

“I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her comodious harbors and her ample rivers, and it was not there; in her fertile fields and boundless prairies; and it was not there; in her rich mines and her vast commerce, and it was not there. Not until I visited the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”
An old adage attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville

“Somehow strangely the vice of men gets well represented and protected but their virtue has none to plead its cause — nor any charter of immunities and rights.”
Henry David Thoreau

“To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society.”
Theodore Roosevelt

“We have never stopped sin by passing laws; and in the same way, we are not going to take a great moral ideal and achieve it merely by law.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower

“No government at any level, or at any price, can afford, on the crime side, the police necessary to assure our safety unless the overwhelming majority of us are guided by an inner, personal code of morality. And you will not get that inner, personal code of morality unless children are brought up in a family — a family that gives them the affection they seek, that makes them feel they belong, that guides them to the future, and that will build continuity in future generations. . . . the greatest inequality today is not inequality of wealth or income. It is the inequality between the child brought up in a loving, supportive family and one who has been denied that birthright.”
Lady Margaret Thatcher

“A state is nothing more than a reflection of its citizens; the more decent the citizens, the more decent the state.”
Ronald Reagan

“Today it would be progress if everyone would stop talking about values. Instead, let us talk, as the Founders did, about virtues.”
George Will

“The ultimate success of this government and the stability of its institutions, its progress in all that can make a nation honored, depend upon its adherence to the principles of truth and righteousness.”
John Lord

“Righteousness exalteth a nation.”
Proverbs 14:34

Liberty and Virtue website

Library every American should read. Must read, and teach others.  The highest form of learning is to teach others.  Of course, the best selling book in all of history, and the one which has done the most good for mankind is the Bible.  Second Best selling book in world history is a John Bunyan’s “Pilgrims Progress”.

Books on politics, current events, Recent World History.

Amneus, Daniel: The Garbage Generation

Beaty, John: Iron Curtain over America.

Bell, J. Bowyer: Terror out of Zion.  The fight for Israeli Independence 

Bowart, Walter: Operation Mind Control

Dall, Curtis: My Exploited Father in Law.

Gaebelein, Arno Duncan: Conflict of the ages.

Griffin, G. Edward: The Creature from Jekyll Island.

Henty, G. A.: In the reign of Terror

Howard-Browne, Rodney: The Killing of Uncle Sam

Jordan, George Racey: From Major Jordan’s Diaries

Kellogg, John Harvey: Plain facts for old and young. (The Founder of Kellogg’s was dead wrong about eugenics and sex in marriage for procreation alone, but he was spot on about everything else)

Mullins, Eustace: The World Order

Oliver, Revilo: Christianity and the Survival of the West.

Rittenhouse, Stan: For fear of the Jews.

Sand, Shlomo: The Invention of the Jewish People.

Stoddard, Lothrop: Into the Darkness, an Uncensored report from inside the Third Reich at War 

Sutton, Anthony: America’s Secret Establishment, an introduction to the Order of the Skull and Bones.

Warburg, Sidney: Hitlers Secret Backers.

Webster, Nesta: Secret Societies and Subversive Movements.

Wilton, Robert: Last Days of the Romanov’s

Young, Leonard: Deadlier than the H-Bomb

Report from Iron Mountain (Detailing how the pandemic was planned for decades ago)

Classics every American should read:

Defoe, Daniel: Robinson Crusoe

Doyle, Arthur Conan: The Complete Sherlock Holmes

Dumas: The Count of Monte Cristo

Elliott, C. W: The Fifty Volume Harvard Classics

Lewis, Meriwether, and Clark, George Rogers: The Journals of Lewis and Clark

Reading for American children, to educate them in manners, virtue, and critical thinking.

Berenstain, Stan and Jan: The Complete Berenstain Bears

L. Frank Baum: The Complete Wizard of Oz series

 

 

 

Election 2020: The willfully ignorant have topped themselves

By Donald N. FinleyI recall watching the White House’s unedited version of President Trump’s 60 Minutesinterview with Lesley Stahl, not the CBS version, and being shocked at her reaction to the president’s mention of the Obama administration spying on his campaign.  “This is 60 Minutes, and we can’t put on things that we can’t verify,” Stahl said.  She said several other current huge issues also couldn’t be verified.  I asked myself ‘Where has she been?  How could she not know these are all true?’  Then I got it . . . she only reads or watches CBS news sources.  Her view of reality is totally distorted by the bias within her own news organization.  She is willfully ignorant. Imagine if Lesley Stahl asked any public figure a question which granted a fact in the question that CBS had never put out in any way as true.  That could be a problem.  Does that mean CBS doesn’t want their television personalities to read any other news sources, lest an unintentional counter bias develop?  What a job it must be to keep up with what is allowed to be true, and what cannot be verified!  Willful ignorance is quite the rage these days.  The evidence is out there for anyone willing to look for it, and if you need help, five-time Emmy award-winning former CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson has many links here.  But Democrats don’t want to look, I suppose for fear of a counter bias developing.  How could it not?  Literally every instance of a voting anomaly, every accusation of cheating, every case of voter fraud – every one benefits Joe Biden.  That means in each and every occurrence, it hurts President Trump.  Can we call that a trend?  Do we see a pattern here?Of course, we do.  The Republicans know it, and the Democrats know it, too. So how then could anyone call for the president to concede because his accusations are baseless conspiracy theories for which there is no evidence?  Willful ignorance.  Either real or fake, in either case, it’s still ignorance.  I’m not a mathematician, statistician, or computer programmer, and I understand the explanations of the impossible numbers.  To understand enough to develop a counter bias, just read this.  If you’re a real numbers person, read this.  If you want to just be convinced now, this will do it.  Reports were rampant immediately after the election about poll watchers in multiple states being forbidden to observe the processing of ballots.  Here’s one, and here’s another still occurring in a recount.  I’m not a lawyer, either, but I understand the Constitution says“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…”  That means, pretty unequivocally, that secretaries of state, governors, and courts can’t change the rules or standards for how ballots are processed.  This happened in Pennsylvania, where the secretary of state unilaterally changed the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots, and in Georgia, where Georgia’s chief elections official, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, had a secret March 6, 2020 “Consent Agreement” with the Democrat Party to alter absentee ballot procedures.  The Constitution says that’s illegal! There are cases of dead people voting, ballots filled out and returned before they were even mailed to the voter, nursing home voter fraud, poll workers filling out ballots themselves, poll workers running ballots through the tabulation machines multiple times, and truckloads of boxed ballots coming into the polling places in the middle of the night through back doors.  There are sworn affidavits and there are videos. I’m convinced.  There’s a picture painted here and it’s an ugly one for the Democrats.  The willfully ignorant managed to top themselves, and committed a larger fraud than the Russia Hoax and the unjust impeachment.  The biggest question now is who will take the fall

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/election_2020_the_willfully_ignorant_have_topped_themselves.html#ixzz6eoXQSrnP
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Racism is alive and well in America

Andrea Widburg

Lately, when it comes to racism, whites are America’s new blacks, circa 1900. Cut, a Seattle-based video-maker, is surfing that trend, with a video asking blacks “So what exactly are white people superior at?” The answers aren’t cute or funny – they’re the 2020 equivalent of accusing blacks of eating watermelons and “shufflin’.”

Cut isn’t some fringe company. It boasts 10.1 million YouTube subscribers. Whether funny or serious, its videos are meant to be hip in a leftist way. Here are some recent titles:

  • Sex Workers & Their Parents Play Truth or Drink
  • Queer Parents & Their Queer Kids Play Truth or Drink
  • My Trans Daughter & I Play Truth or Drink
  • What are the gun laws in your country (people all over the world explain how bad guns are)
  • Kids Share Their BLM Protest Signs

It’s all about leftist indoctrination and reinforcing leftist ideas.

Even for a site like Cut, it’s still shocking to watch “So what exactly are white people superior at?” (You must view at YouTubebecause age-limits mean it cannot be embedded here.)

Writing at Not the Bee summarizes what’s going on with the 100 black people interviewed:

The question seems to be a tongue-in-cheek take on the concept of white supremacy. [snip] But this video quickly devolves into a racist hate-fest demonizing all white people.

The first few answers to the question are fairly benign: White people are superior at talking about their pets too much, making bland food, extreme sports, corn mazes and liking mayonnaise. That’s all pretty funny, I suppose. I get it, humor sometimes pushes boundaries and we can laugh at our cultural idiosyncrasies.

But obviously, people would rightfully lose their ever-loving minds if a bunch of white people made a video just listing racial stereotypes about black people.

[snip]

But the video takes a dark turn fairly quickly.

One young lady wearing a T-Shirt that depicts a police officer in a KKK hood firing a shotgun (yeah.), without a hint of mirth simply says white people are superior at “smelling funky.”

Attributing negative qualities to people because of their skin color is classic racism. As I said, above, what these people are saying is indistinguishable from someone in a KKK hood, circa 1900, throwing out ugly answers when asked “what are black people superior at?”

Rose nails the root of the problem:

If you haven’t already noticed, latent in many of these answers are the same ideologies behind BLM, the 1619 Project, and movements to defund the police. These are devotees of the religion of Wokeism. True believers.

The leftism behind their answers isn’t subtle: “Conquering.” “Imperialism.” “Colonizing.” “Colonialism.” “Violence.” Genocide.” “Taking our ideas.”

Leftism destroys everything – absolutely everything – that it touches:

  • It took first and second wave feminism (right to vote, equal pay for equal work) and turned it into third wave man-hating feminism.
  • It took the Great Society and welfare, and turned them into the destruction of the black family in America, with all the pathologies that follow.
  • It took the concept of avoiding cruel and unusual punishment when dealing with criminals, and turned it into no punishment at all, which increases crime, destroys societal trust, and puts criminals at grave risk of vigilantism.
  • It took the idea that the state cannot promote or interfere with religion and turned it into a state hostile to religion.
  • It took the Civil Rights movement, one premised on the fact that we are all equal before God and the law, and turned it into a foundation for dangerous, divisive, and tragic anti-white hatred.

Trump tried hard to be president for all Americans. Unlike other Republicans, he did reach out to the black community (prison release, support black colleges, creating opportunity zones) but he also refused to embrace a racial divide in America. He talked about values, not skin color. He talked about jobs, not victim politics. It was the left that forced racism upon him. None of it came from Trump.

If — God forbid – Biden gets into the White House, expect his administration to stir up more racial animus than Obama ever did. In the four years since Obama left office, the left has been busy fomenting the type of hatred America last saw with George Wallace and Orville Faubus in Alabama and Arkansas.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/racism_is_alive_and_well_in_america_.html

COVID-19 flare-up and tyrannical edicts: Just a coincidence right after the election fraud?

C.M. MentorWell, here we go again. COVID-19 hysteria is peaking once more and it’s coming just days after a momentous presidential election. What a coincidence! Is there any possibility that this is happening because the Democrats feel the need for a big, attention-getting distraction from the stench of a fixed election? It is becoming very apparent that there was a mind-blowing level of vote fraud, in several states at least, to rob Donald Trump of a landslide victory. Not the usual, criminal Democrat vote fraud, but industrial-strength, highly criminal, highly coordinated fraud. Fraud using every known trick and what looks like a bunch of new ones, too. The usual tricks include dead people voting, people voting multiple times, paid-for votes, miscounted votes, deleted votes, created votes, etc. etc. These things seem to happen every election when Democrats are in control. This election, however, might involve ballot creation and vote-tabulating computer software jiggering on a massive scale. Truckloads of ballots delivered in the middle of the night, pristine ballots for only candidate Joe Biden with printer-accuracy selection marks or machine manipulated irregular marks, large vote blocs suddenly moving from Trump to Biden, all vote blocs marking only Biden, and exactly the same percentage of votes favoring Biden versus Trump in numerous state precincts, and many other very odd anomalies. All of this stinks and everyone knows it. Fair-minded people know that Donald Trump’s campaign was light-years ahead of sleepy, masked, basement-dwelling Joe Biden’s. Trump often had four or five events every day which drew tens-of-thousands each. He did this day after day and he is 74 years old! There was tremendous enthusiasm for his candidacy. Joe Biden often drew about 10 people at his events, and sometimes voters literally ignored him. Fortunately, they were all in their safety circles with face masks on. Donald Trumps outstanding campaign, the success of down-ballot Republicans, and his resounding vote lead well after polls closed all point to his highly-probable, amazing victory. When confronted with the Trump vote margins, Democrat web-spinners obviously said to themselves “Whoa, Nellie!” They instructed their comrades in the various swing states to stop the vote count to give time to get more Biden ballots and “adjust” the vote tabulating computer settings and software. The fact that the vote counting was stopped at all and that it was done in multiple states at the same time is an obvious tip-off to coordinated fraud. It is reported now that the Dominion Voting Systems computer hardware, which are widely used in many of the swing states, have software with settings that can be altered in real-time, either locally or remotely, via the internet, and sure enough, some were hooked up to the internet. Their computers also have built-in settings that can be altered locally to adjust the weighting of candidate votes in selected races. This is not a sick joke. One can only imagine the mischief (fraud) that is possible by fiddling with the vote totals once the ballots have been counted and are in the “system.” Josef Stalin knew the power of vote counting versus vote casting and commented on it many years ago. Some of the very interesting things to start appearing after the election are the forensic data analyses of the voting and its patterns. Many of the techniques are frequently used in financial and other fraud investigations. Such things as Benford’s first-digit rule, Bernoulli trial analysis and just-plain logic and common sense reveal much that is very wrong in the vote patterns of many swing states. Ballots being received before they were mailed out is one indicator that pops out of the voting data. Many private-individual data experts have performed extensive analysis and found strong evidence of manipulation. This kind of evidence may not satisfy courtroom requirements, but it does represent billowing clouds of suspicious, dark smoke rising from the election. Where there is smoke… The oddities might also be just like fingerprints at a crime scene. Questions about the integrity of the elections started arising almost immediately after the election. So what an appropriate time to goose-up the ante on the COVID-19 hysteria to distract people’s minds from the complexities of voting, vote counting, undecided state elections, fraud and all manner of related things. It is much easier for people to understand a plague-like death from a horrific pandemic and the need to wear masks everywhere and at all times. Simple…and once masked Joe Biden is safely in the White House everything will be fine. The pretext for the renewed hysteria is the increase in the number of “cases” of COVID-19 that we have now. You know, the cases resulting from the inaccurate, ever increasing, and often over-sensitive tests that are being performed. Tests that have produced a ‘positive’ in one nostril and a ‘negative’ in the other nostril on the same person. Tests that trigger a ‘positive’ when only harmless fragments of a virus are present due to overly-sensitive test thresholds. The reality is that healthy people under about age 65 have minor or no symptoms when they test positive for the virus. The vast majority of the population does not need to be locked down or wear masks. Let them live their lives. Older people, especially those with health problems, need to be careful – just as they must during flu season. The CDC recently announced that the number of people who died from the COVID-19 virus alone is less than 10,000. The rest of the deaths involved people with two or three other, major health problems. The average age of the deceased is around 78 the same as it is for all other death causes. I don’t trust any of the COVID-19 death statistics. They are filled with false positives and actual death causes that have nothing to do with the virus. COVID deaths have been so financially incentivized that the statistics are very tainted. Yes, testing reveals that people are getting the virus, but spreading is what viruses are very good. There is nothing known that can stop this. Lockdowns and masks do very little, at best. There is no science or data that show otherwise. Viruses must propagate through society to the point where there are no more hosts. This is herd immunity which commonly means that roughly 20% of the population is susceptible to the virus and 80% has immunity for various reasons. The best that can be done is to limit the viral load by maintaining distance from others and washing your hands. Stuff people do during flu season. By the way, don’t viruses always flare up in the fall? Stop the testing and case insanity and let people live their lives. It is a struggle to comprehend what kind of people inflict such harm on their fellow citizens as the governors of the states that have just ratcheted up their tyrannical lock-down, shut-down, curfew and gathering edicts have. These people are almost all Democrats. The harm is enormous and it affects untold millions of people. Ruined businesses, lost revenue, drug addition, domestic abuse, child abuse and suicide. This array of social harm far outweighs any possible good that the edicts produce which is miniscule at best. In fact, we have many months of lock-down and mask-wearing experience already. See all the good that did? Sane, thinking people don’t, but tyrannical, mostly Democrat governors apparently do. Maybe they should pay attention to their beloved WHO that recently announced that lock-downs and shut-downs really aren’t such a good idea due to their immensely harmful impact on society. However, cranking up the COVID-19 hysteria right now might just be the ticket for a timely fear-filled, distraction from massive Democrat vote fraud and criminality.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/covid19_flareup_and_tyrannical_edicts_just_a_coincidence_right_after_the_election_fraud.html

Communist Takeover
of the U.S. and the WORLD

nder the “cover” of a HOAX CoronaVirus “Pandemic” “Shelter in place” = MARTIAL LAW!
Lorraine Day, M.D.
March 21, 2020
The CoronaVirus causes nothing more than the Common Cold. This is a HOAX “Pandemic” to transition the United States and the Whole World – – into Communism.
Here’s what they are accomplishing through this HOAX “Pandemic”:
1) Shutting down the massive Yellow Vest protests in France
2) Shutting down the Hong Kong protestors
3) Frightening the people of the world into accepting a Vaccine, purportedly for the
Corona Virus, that will Kill them, either rapidly or slowly.
4) “Chipping” the population through a “chip” placed in the Vaccine injection
5) Tracking every person in the world through the chip
6) Isolating people, especially in America, so no citizen militias will be able to form
to fight the Communist Takeover
7) Possibly starve millions of people to death from the “nationalization” (read,
Communist takeover) of grocery stores and food supply chains (Remember the Holodomor: the starving to death of millions of Christians in Ukraine by Stalin’s Jewish Communist Bolsheviks – funded by U.S. Jewish Wall St. Bankers!)
8) Confiscation of guns (how does THAT have anything to do with a supposed “Pandemic”?)
9) Cashless Society (Dissenters to the government will not be able to buy or sell)
10) Eliminate Government dissent by withholding food from those individuals
11) Population Extermination
12) Quarantining in Isolation government dissenters, killing them, harvesting and
trafficking their organs, then say they died of the “CoronaVirus” as they have done in China
“The most common symptoms of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are fever, tiredness,
and dry cough. Most people (about 80%) recover from the disease without needing
special treatment” according to medical websites, including the World Health
Organization.

13) Crash the economy to bring about a massive depression: blame it on the CoronaVirus instead of the (Jewish-owned) Federal Reserve which is truly responsible
14) Bring about massive unemployment by destroying all small businesses who can’t continue to exist with the “shelter in place” ruling
15) Enforce Martial Law: When you are commanded to “Shelter in place” THAT is Martial Law!
16) Eliminate all professional sports. Provide PornHub FREE to everyone so while “sheltered at home” they will have little to watch except filthy Porn, to destroy any remaining decency in Americans.
17) People will be so thankful to be allowed out of their homes when this lock-down is over, they will not complain about the remaining draconian Communist repression
18) Establish a Jewish, Communist, Bolshevik, One World Totalitarian Government and take away ALL rights.
19) Covertly Installing 5G/Biometric Systems during Lockdown – including in schools 20) Suspend Habeus Corpus which allows Indefinite Detention WITHOUT a Trial 21) Set a precedent to DENY medical are to the Elderly (Get rid of the old people –
the ones the Globalist Jews call “Useless Eaters”!)
A.This is the Plan of the Jews for the Gentiles of the world, straight from the Protocols of Zion:
“IT IS INDISPENSABLE TO… UTTERLY EXHAUST HUMANITY WITH DISSENSION, HATRED, STRUGGLE, ENVY AND EVEN BY THE USE OF TORTURE, BY STARVATION, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, BY WANT, SO THAT THE “GOYIM” SEE NO OTHER ISSUE THAN TO TAKE REFUGE IN OUR COMPLETE SOVEREIGNTY IN MONEY AND IN ALL ELSE.” Protocols of Zion, 10:19
B. The “holiest” book of the Jews, the Babylonian Talmud, says the following:
C. Georgia Guidestones: the American “Stonehenge” in Elberton, Georgia
In Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth) it says:
“Even the best of the Goyim (Gentiles) should be killed”

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. (That means they have to kill off 5 1⁄2 BILLION people SOON!)
D. Now the Government Can Legally Kill Christians
NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS
by Bill Dannemeyer (husband of Dr. Lorraine Day) U.S. Congressman, 1979-1992
Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the “crime” of worshipping Jesus Christ! A diabolic deception has been perpetrated on the American people by

their OWN leaders, Senators and Congressmen, who have sold their soul to the devil. On March 5, 1991, in the House of Representatives, and March 7, 1991, in the U.S. Senate, without any knowledge of, or input by, the people of the United States, U.S. Senators and Congressmen passed a law that is so outrageous – and frankly unconstitutional – that it forces the American people to be bound by a set of monstrous rules, called the Noahide Laws, rules that make the belief in Jesus Christ a crime punishable by decapitation by guillotine! On March 20, 1991, President George H.W. Bush, a supposed Christian, signed the bill into law. (Deanna’s note: President George W. Bush follows in his father’s footsteps. See A Free Press, A Free Pass)
Before you respond, “NO, that cannot be – not in our free country!” let me explain.
The passage of this law, HJ Res. 104, is especially troublesome to me because I was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time it was passed. Even worse, I was in the House Chamber the very day that is was passed, voting on other legislation. Yet I, as a U.S. Congressman, had NO KNOWLEDGE that it had been passed or even that it was to be brought up for a vote. How could this be? How could the deception be so pervasive that those of us who had sworn to uphold our country’s Constitution, particularly those of us (few, indeed) who really took our position seriously as the protectors of the people, could be totally in the dark regarding the content of this bill and its passage by the leaders of this country – by treachery and deceit?
Here’s how it happened!
On January 31, 1991, an innocuous-sounding Resolution was introduced,
designating March 26, 1991 as “Education Day, USA.” It was purposely given this name to deceive the American people. It was, in fact, a Double Deception because not only did the Resolution have nothing to do with “Education,” it was also deceptively billed as a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. But in truth, the Resolution was nothing less than a secret, under-handed plot to control the American people by the Noahide Laws – a subterfuge for
the elimination of Christianity, the elimination of all Christians, and the enslavement of all remaining “Gentiles.”
The Resolution, first introduced by Minority Leader, Rep. Robert H. Michel of Illinois, was then referred to the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee. Early in March 1991, 225 members of the House had signed on as co-sponsors of this Resolution, but it is highly doubtful they were given the full text of the document. They were probably told only that it was a Resolution in honor of Rabbi Schneerson’s birthday. Most likely they had no knowledge that the treacherous Noahide Laws were a silent attachment. I was not one of the co-sponsors. The committee referred this Resolution to the House for a vote on March 5, 1991. But here is where the real treachery begins! The record states that the House of Representatives passed this Resolution by “Unanimous Consent.” But what the average American does not know is that “Unanimous Consent”

is a euphemism for getting a bill passed “under the radar” with almost NO ONE present to vote AND with NO RECORD of who voted or HOW they voted.
A Congressman’s ears prick up when he hears the words “Unanimous Consent” because he is aware that this may be a signal for skullduggery. And in this case, it most certainly was! On the day this Resolution was “passed,” the entire membership of the House of Representatives had already been dismissed after having been told that the day’s work, including all the voting, was over. We could all go home. It was THEN, after virtually ALL members had left, that the traitorous authors of this Resolution brought it up for a vote on the House floor – with only four hand-picked members present. It was then deceitfully “passed” by “Unanimous Consent” on March 5, 1991, by voice vote with almost NO ONE there and NO RECORD made of their names or how they voted. Two days later, on March 7 1991, the U.S. Senate passed the Resolution by voice vote, also with no recorded vote. On March 20, 1991, it was signed by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law 102-14.
As you read on, you will discover the identity of the evil forces that have so much control over the U.S. Government that they can accomplish these dastardly deeds under cover of darkness.
This is the language of HJ Res. 104: 102nd CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 104
JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as Education Day, U.S.A.'. HJ 104 EH 102nd CONGRESS 1st Session H. J. RES. 104 JOINT RESOLUTION To designate March 26, 1991, asEducation Day, U.S.A.’.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and reveredand his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, the rebbe,' this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one ofeducation and giving,’ the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and
Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.’. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 1991. Attest:
Clerk.
END
The Lubavitch movement mentioned in HJ Res. 104, began in the late 18th century and is the largest branch of orthodox Hasidic Judaism. One of its prime goals is the enforcement of the Noahide Laws on all humanity.
The words “Seven Noahide Laws” are mentioned twice in this Resolution. But completely missing from this Resolution are the following:

  1. WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
  2. WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME

FROM?

  1. WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
  2. WHO DEFINES WHAT THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
  3. “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
  4. TO WHOM DO THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
  5. IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
    (1) WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
    The Encyclopedia of Judaism describes The Noachide Laws (the words Noahide and Noachide are used interchangeably) as follows:
    The Noahide Laws – The Encyclopedia of Judaism
    Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
    Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
    The abandonment of idolatry;
    The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
    The prohibition of murder;
    Also that of theft;
    The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [ie., cruelty in any shape or form] (Babylonian Talmud. Sanh. 56A)
    Before providing answers to the other six questions, I would like to describe my analysis of the process by which this Resolution was adopted by Congress.
    When you initially read HJ Res. 104, it seems to be a vehicle for recognizing the eighty- ninth birthday and the beginning of the 90th year of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson which fell on March 26, 1991. I have no recollection of anyone asking me to co-sponsor this Resolution so I am not familiar with what reasons were given to House of Representative members to sign on as co-sponsors.
    The language of the Resolution speaks for itself. But the consequences of their adoption is that the Seven Noahide Laws have been recognized by the Congress of the United States and the President of America as “the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” and the claim will be made that they are now the law of our land, the United States. Most Americans would be shocked to learn that the Babylonian Talmud, NOT

the Old Testament, is the “Holiest” book of Judaism, and is the source of these Seven Noahide Laws, which provide a specific penalty for violating any of these Seven Noahide Laws, namely death by decapitation [Sanhedrin 57A]
Make no mistake about it, what appeared to be nothing more than a recognition of the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Schneerson and the establishment of Education Day in the United States will be claimed by the proponents of this Resolution as the establishment of a law by which a Christian who worships Jesus Christ will be charged with idolatry and decapitated.
Based on my fourteen years of service in the House of Representatives, the process by which HJ Res. 104 was adopted was a complete disregard and purposeful circumvention of a very important basis on which representative government is founded. Namely, accountability to the people of America of how we conduct the people’s business. Specifically, roll call votes are the means whereby members of Congress identify what laws have been passed and by whom. When laws and resolutions pass by unanimous consent, watch out! In this case someone or some group wanted to hide the real purpose behind a seemingly innocuous birthday recognition of Rabbi Schneerson.
I was not part of the discussion that led to the drafting and presentation of HJ Res. 104, to members of Congress. But based on my knowledge of how Congress works, this describes what most probably took place.
Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do. A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this. “He who has the gold – rules!”
Stephen Sizer, author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:
“The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US yet it is already the largest and most powerful. The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’. Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda’ and to express ‘the truth about Israel’. The UCFI includes three of the largest Christian Zionist organizations: Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and Christians for Israel.
This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides. Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’ According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate

that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’. Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (page 215)
Jewish lobbyists were successful in enlisting Minority Leader, Congressman Bob Michael, to be the chief sponsor of this resolution purportedly to honor and recognize Rabbi Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch movement, on his eighty-ninth birthday.
These lobbyists wanted to eliminate, for obvious reasons, any chance for discussion of the seven questions written above in this report. Specifically, the Bible, with particular reference in this instance to the Ten Commandments written by God, is the source of the ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society, not the Seven Noahide Laws, written by man.
To avoid this debate and the recorded vote that would have followed, a strategy was devised to get Resolution 104 adopted by “unanimous consent” with no documentation that 99% of all House members were absent, and none of the four members that were present would be held accountable by a recorded vote.
The Journal of the House of Representatives (JHR) for March 5, 1991, on page 151, describes item 30.12 H Res. 95- Unfinished Business. This Resolution commended the President and United States and allied military forces in the success of Operation Desert Storm. A recorded vote was taken and Item 30.13 describes the count: Yeas 410, Nays 8. My yes vote was among the 410. This page contains the name of each member present and how he or she voted.
Item 30.14, on the next page (page 152) of the JHR, recorded the announcement that when the House adjourns, it will meet on Wednesday, March 6, at 12 noon. This told all the members that there would be no more roll call votes on Tuesday, March 5, that the day’s business was over, and within minutes after this announcement, virtually all the members were off the House floor, on their way home, and totally unaware of anything thereafter that was brought up.
Here is the subsequent record of what took place AFTER the members were gone. Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:
But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptitiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution. This is how it occurred:
Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post

Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res.

  1. Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object, but did not object. If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent. Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY). Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel. It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.
    After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found. From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed! At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995-2001). But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003-2005). After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event.
    Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer. There was no objection.
    30.16 EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A.
    On motion of Mr. Sawyer, by unanimous consent, the Committee on Post Office and Civil service was discharged from further consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) to designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, U.S. A.”
    When said joint resolution was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
    A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said joint resolution was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
    Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said joint resolution.
    Their total remarks consumed no more than four or five minutes and there was not even a mention of the Seven Noahide Laws. For the balance of the early evening these routine non-controversial items were considered by the “House” with only these four members present.
    Item 30.17 National Employ the Older Worker Week Item 30.18 Baltic Foreeda day
    Item 30.19 Leave of Absence
    Item 30.20 Adjournment
    The Jews claim that with their financial contributions they have bought control of the U.S. Congress, and so they have. As proof of this statement no one needs to search further than the blunt words of Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, uttered

on October 3, 2001 to his colleague, Shimon Peres:
“Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that…I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Indeed, the Jews had “bought” control of the House and Senate which resulted in ignoring the whole concept of accountability that the presence of debate and a roll call vote accomplishes. Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object. And because no one objected, passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution. By design there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did. This is a prime example of the fraud perpetrated on the American people by their so-called “Representatives.” The oft quoted cliché is operating here, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”
(2) WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
Dr. Eliezer Segal, a Jewish Associate Professor of Theology at the University of Calgary, admits that history proves that the Talmud, Mishnah (a part of the Talmud) and the seven Noahide Laws are derived from Babylonian traditions, that Jesus vehemently denounced because they nullified the teaching of Scripture.
The Encyclopedia of Judaism identifies the Babylonian Talmud (T.B.) as the source of the Noahide Laws.
According to “Secret Societies and Subversive Movements,” by Nesta Webster, the Talmud, and the Kabbalah, were derived from Jewish oral Traditions which the Jews claim to have the same authority as the Laws of Moses found in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
The “Holiest” books of Judaism are the Talmud, a compendium of over 100 “books” written by Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis, that is the utter perversion of God’s Word. The Kabbalah, another Jewish “holy book,” is a book of witchcraft and licentious debauchery.
Provisions of the Talmud, Genesis Rabbah 16: 6. Sanhedrin 56 states that the seven Noahide Laws were commanded to Adam. Yet there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim.

The book, Judaism’s Strange Gods, by Michael A. Hoffman (2000), describes how the Talmud specifically defines all non-Jews as non-human animals. It also distinguishes between actions by Jews against non-Jews, from actions of non-Jews against Jews. Jews are clearly spoken of as Superior to non-Jews.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed. Acceptable to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a. A Jew need not pay a gentile the wages owed him. Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite (Gentile) there is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
Baba Mezia 24a. If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b.) Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a gentile…”
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a. When a Jew murders a gentile there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
“Relying upon the Code of Maimonides and the Halacha, the Gush Emunim leader Rabbi Israel Ariel stated: “A Jew who killed a non-Jew is exempt from human judgment and has not violated the religious prohibition of murder.”
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile. Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human

Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals. Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Insults Against Mary
Sanhedrin 106a. says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus’ mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.
Jesus is also described in the Talmud
By 1999, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations described Jesus as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak.
On the website of the Orthodox Jewish, Chabad-Lubavitch group, chabad.org, — one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organizations in the world and whose spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachen Mendel Schneerson, whose birthday honoring was the false flag cover-up for signing into law the authority to murder Christians for worshiping Jesus Christ — we find the following statement, accompanied by citations from the Talmud:
“The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’

  1. ‘He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).’”
  2. “He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).”
  3. “He learned witchcraft in Egypt…(Shabbos 104b).” (End quote from Chabad- Lubavitch).
    More quotes from the Talmud about Jesus
    Gitten 57a says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”
    Sanhedrin 43 says Jesus was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”

Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai” Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
This Talmudic passage has been concealed in some translations.
The Jewish Encyclopedia states, “…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Monor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b). But “heathen” is translated as “Gentile” (non-Jews) by the Jews.
Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human
The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam.
Moses Maimonides: Advocate of Extermination
The rabbinic teacher Moses Maimonides called the “Rambam” by the Jews, is revered in Judaism as a supreme “sage” of the highest stature.
“Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history. He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “our Rabbi, Moses son of Maimon.”
According to the introduction to the book, Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud, and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes. The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”
Here is what Maimonides taught concerning the saving of the life of a Gentile or Christian, and even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:
“Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him.”
Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court – or a court appointed by Jewish authority— that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non- Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of

Jewish holy war.
These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah). But there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim. This claim is a preposterous FRAUD – and a sign of the anti-Christ!
Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has diabolically compared HJ Res. 104 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”
The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order (One World Government) immediately preceding the “universal reign of the Talmud.” A terrifying prospect, indeed!
These provisions of the Talmud, the same Talmud that is the source of the Noahide laws, make very clear why the proponents of HJ Res. 104 used the subterfuge of obtaining the passage of this legislation without any debate or a recorded vote. HJ Res. 104 was fraudulently and deceitfully passed by “unanimous consent” when no one was around to consider and discuss the provisions of the Talmud. If these had been brought to the attention of the members of Congress, HJ Res. 104 would never have been passed.
The Chabad Lubavitch falsely claims that God gave the Seven Noahide Laws at Mt. Sinai with the intention that the Children of Israel should keep them and teach them to the Gentiles. This is a deliberate lie!
There is absolutely no support in the Bible for this fraudulent claim.
The Source of these Seven Noahide Laws was NOT, as the Jews have claimed, directions from God to Adam – or Noah – or Moses. Their source is the Oral Traditions of the Pharisees that began in Babylon after the Israelites were captured in 586 BC.
Over 600 years later, after the Pharisees had killed Christ and the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, these Oral Traditions were written down and became the Babylonian Talmud.
(3) WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
The Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt took place in about 1445 BC. Moses died in 1405 BC. Shortly after beginning the forty year wandering in the desert, God wrote the Ten Commandments on two tablets with his own finger and they are recorded in Exodus 20: 1-17.

The ancient nation of Israel reached its height of power and prestige during the reign of Solomon from 960-930 BC.
After Solomon, most of the Israelite kings were corrupt or inept and the Northern ten tribes of Israel were taken captive by Assyria in 721 BC. The Southern tribes, Judah and Benjamin, were expelled to Babylon in about 586 BC, after which the Talmud oral traditions, specifically including the Seven Noahide Laws, were produced in Babylon during this period.
(4) WHO DEFINES WHAT THE NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
A Jewish website, www.NoahideNations.com, states that the worship of any deity other than God, which includes Jesus Christ, is idolatry. The penalty for idolatry is decapitation.
Moses Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon 1138-1204) is recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher. Maimonides’ Mishnah Torah, Chapter 10 of the English translation, states concerning Jesus Christ:
“It is a mitzvah (religious command or duty), however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minim (Gentiles = non-Jews), and apikorsim (secular Jews), and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot.” Sanh.57A of the Talmud states the penalty for disobedience, with these words:
“One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”
The Noahide Laws will be administered by a restored Sanhedrin, the ruling body of Jews that found Jesus Christ guilty of blasphemy on the accusations of two false witnesses according to Matthew 26:60. Under the “Courts of Law” section of the Noahide Laws this is stated:
“A person may be convicted in a Noahide court on the testimony of single witness, but only if the witness is known to be righteous.”
(5) “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
It is God’s Law, the Ten Commandments, that is the basis of civilization, NOT the Noahide Laws written by the killers of Christ – the Pharisees.

The Ten Commandments are found in Exodus 20: 1-17 and were written by God in his own finger on two tablets of stone, to show their permanence. God wrote these Commandments shortly after the Exodus that began in 1445 BC.
Although false claims have been made by the Jews that the origin of the Noahide Laws began with Adam, and included Noah and Moses, Jewish Professor Segal stated that the evidence of history proves that the origin of the Seven Noahide Laws is the Babylonian Traditions!
The captivity and removal to Babylon of the Southern tribes Judah and Benjamin occurred in 586 BC.
In other words, at least 859 years after God gave the Ten Commandments to mankind on Mt. Sinai, the Pharisees, the cultural progeny of the killers of Christ, in exile in Babylon, drafted the Seven Noahide Laws which were written by “man,” NOT by GOD!
In examining the history of the Seven Noahide Laws, no claim is made that God wrote them and/or that He wrote them with His own finger, as He did the Ten Commandments.
TEN COMMANDMENTS IN THE ARK OF COVENANT
The two tablets of stone containing the Ten Commandments written by God, were housed inside the Ark of the Covenant. (2 Chronicles 5:10, 1 Kings 8:9) The ordinances, written by Moses, were housed in a side pocket on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant. (Deuteronomy 31:26)
When Jesus died on the cross He abolished the ordinances written by Moses (housed on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant) including the sanctuary-related ordinances that looked forward to the sacrificial lamb, Jesus Christ, and thus were abolished when these were fulfilled with the crucifixion of Christ. But the ordinances did NOT include the Ten Commandments. The ordinances were totally separate from the Ten Commandments.
No trace of a claim by anyone has been found which asserts that the Seven Noahide Laws were inside or on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant or anywhere during the Israelites sojourn in the wilderness. This fact is not surprising since the Seven Noahide Laws were first developed as a part of the Babylonian Talmud long after the exile of the Israelites to Babylon in 586 BC.
Exodus 20:3-17, contains the Ten Commandments:
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12 Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor’s.
What God gave in these texts to the Children of Israel was clearly conditional. In the 23rd Chapter of Matthew, Jesus properly brought to account the Scribes and Pharisees for not keeping the covenant, the Ten Commandments. No better proof of the total rejection of the covenant was the actions of the Jews to call for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
The only reason the Pharisaical leaders of the Jews did not directly order Jesus’ death, was that they did not have the legal authority to do so. They were under Roman rule and only a Roman ruler could order the death penalty for any person. So they pressured Pilate (who said “I find NO FAULT in this “man” (Jesus)) to order the Jews’ murderous demand.
Many Christian leaders claim that the Ten Commandments were done away with at the Cross and only those commandments that Christ specifically mentioned in the New Testament are to be kept by “New Testament Christians.”
This is their justification for ignoring the Fourth Commandment which is God’s command that we keep holy the Sabbath day (Saturday) as the Sabbath. But in the following analysis, you will see that ALL Ten Commandments including the (Saturday) Sabbath

Commandment are given in the New Testament.
In addition, Jesus Himself, kept the Seventh Day Sabbath, and Jesus was NOT a Jew. Jesus is God and God is not Jewish.
The Christian Patriot Association of Boring, Oregon, published this document, “The Law of God” which contains a side by side scriptural reference of the Old and New Testament concerning the Ten Commandments.
THE LAW OF GOD OLD TESTAMENT

  1. Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.
  2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me, and keep my commandments.
  3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord they God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.
  4. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day; wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.
  5. Honor thy father and thy mother; that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
  6. Thou shalt not kill.
  7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
    8 Thou shalt not steal
  8. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
  9. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor’s.

Exodus 20:1-18
I will not alter nor break the thing that is gone out of my lips. (See Psalms 89:34)
NEW TESTAMENT

  1. “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.” Matthew 4:10
  2. “Little children keep yourselves from idols.” “Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.” 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29
  3. “That the name of God and His doctrine be not blasphemed.” 1 Timothy 6:1
  4. “Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day.” “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath, therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath.” “For He spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise. And God did rest the seventh day from all His works.” “There remaineth therefore a keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God. For he that is entered into His rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from His.” “For by Him were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth.” Matthew 24:20, Mark 2:27;28; Hebrews 4:4, 9, 10, margin; Colossians 1:16.
  5. “Honor thy father and thy mother.” Matthew 19:19. 6. “Thou shalt not kill.” Romans 13:9.
  6. “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” Matthew 19:18. 8. “Thou shalt not steal.” Romans 13:9.
  7. “Thou shalt not bear false witness.” Romans 13:9. 10. “Thou shalt not covet.” Romans 7:7.
    AFTER HIS DEATH
    “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: Yea, we establish the law.” Romans 3.31.
    “They… rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment.” Luke 23:54-56 SABBATH IN THE NEW EARTH

“For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before Me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain, and it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, saith the Lord.” lsaiah 66:22,23. See Mark 2:27-28.
The words of Jesus in Matthew 5:17-19 completely disprove the idea that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven” (NIV)
When Jesus used the word “fulfill” He meant to convey the idea that His life was a living example of the Ten Commandments. To reach the conclusion that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments would necessitate changing the verb “fulfill” to “abolish” in total conflict with the negative expressly stated by Jesus in the use of this verb. Jesus said, “I have not come to abolish them (the Ten Commandments).”
In Matthew 19:18-19 Jesus mentions Commandments 5-10. These six Commandments reveal how man is to relate to his fellow man.
In Mark 2:27-28, Jesus uses these words to make clear that He not only recognizes and affirms the Fourth Commandment, but He has complete authority over it:
27 The Sabbath was made for man (all mankind, anthropos in Greek – the root word for anthropology – the study of humanity), and not man for the Sabbath. 28Therefore, the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath. (This is the Seventh day (Saturday) Sabbath.)
In Matthew 4:10 Jesus affirms the First Commandment with these words: Thou shall worship the Lord thy God and Him only shalt thou serve.
The Apostles John, Mark and Paul made specific references to the Second and Third Commandments in 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29 and 1 Timothy 6:1.
Archeologists have searched for many centuries in the Christian era to find the Ark of the Covenant. Yet no one has claimed to have found it. In Revelation 11:19, John’s vision revealed that the ark of His covenant was still in the heavenly temple of God. Here are John’s words:
Then the temple of God was opened in heaven, and the Ark of His covenant was seen

in His temple. And there was lightings, noises, thunderings, and earthquakes and great hail.
The Ark of the Covenant had/has only one item in it – the Ten Commandments. God is telling us through John, the Revelator, that the Ten Commandments are still operative now and will never be abolished. The reason heaven will be heaven is that the Ten Commandments will be in the heart of everyone there.
(6) TO WHOM DO THE NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
Proponents of the Noahide Laws claim that the Ten Commandments were given exclusively to the Nation of Israel who they incorrectly refer to as “Jews”—and the Noahide Laws were given to govern all other persons, – “non-Jews” – or goyim – Gentiles.
Scriptural texts that are quoted to support this false view are Exodus 19:3-6 and 20:1-2 and 3:17. But even a cursory examination of these texts will prove this claim to be utter nonsense.
Exodus 19:3-6
3And Moses went up unto God, and the LORD called unto him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel; 4Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles’ wings, and brought you unto myself. 5Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: 6And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel. The children of Israel were then – and are now – of no particular ethnicity. The term “children of Israel” refers to the TRUE followers of Jesus Christ.
Exodus 20:1-2
1And God spoke all these words, saying ,I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Egypt, in the Bible, is symbolic for sin. See Rev. 11:8.
Exodus 3:17
17And I have said, I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt unto the land of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, unto a land flowing with milk and honey.
There is no language in any of these texts of Scripture, or for that matter any other text of Scripture in the entire Bible, to support the claim that the Noahide Laws were given to

govern all non-Jews and the Ten Commandments were given only to the Jews.
The assertion that the Ten Commandments were given only to the Israelites of old (and supposedly the Jews of today) is CONTRARY to the Word of God and completely ignores the TRUTH of the New Testament. Jesus made this clear in Matthew 5:17: 17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Jesus “fulfilled” the law by showing us how we must keep the law. Paul in Galatians 3:16, 29 made the same point:
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
The true followers of Jesus Christ, wherever they may be found, are the “seed of Abraham and heirs according to the promise.”
(7) IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL? The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides among other things, that:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
HJ Res. 104 fraudulently claims that the Seven Noahide Laws are the “bedrock of society” from the dawn of civilization. This is a deliberate lie and seeks to re-write history. The Seven Noahide Laws were written by Jewish Pharisees and Rabbis about 586 BC, when the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were in exile in Babylon.
The Ten Commandments were written by God in His own finger in stone approximately 1445 BC at Mt. Sinai.
The Ten Commandments were written by God over 850 years BEFORE the Seven Noahide Laws were written by man. The Ten Commandments, NOT the fraudulent Noahide Laws, are the generally acknowledged bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, but have not been designated as law by an act of Congress.
Because the Seven Noahide Laws are obviously religious in their purpose, any act of Congress that attempts to establish them as the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization is clearly religious and in a complete and total violation of the First Amendment.

CONCLUSION
The Noahide Laws have nothing to do with Noah, or Adam or God. In about 2600 B.C. (approximately 1400 or 1500 years after creation), God directed Noah to build an ark and save his family and the animal population of the world from the flood which destroyed life on the surface of the earth.
Over two thousand years later, in 586 BC, during the Babylonian captivity, diabolical laws were developed by the Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis who sought to title these laws with a name that would give them legitimacy.
The purpose of the Jews in developing the Noahide Laws is to rule over all of the non- Jews in the world without having to suffer a mass conversion of these people to Judaism which they fear would dilute the cultural cohesion of the Jewish population.
The Rabbis who produced the Talmud and the Noahide Laws claim that the Noahide Laws are the universal way of reaching God even though they privately state the Noahide Laws are only for the “Gentiles.” Behind this false claim is the true belief of the Rabbis that it is the means whereby the Rabbis are seen as God and are to be worshiped as God by the “Gentiles.”
The Noahide Laws are to become the national, though undeclared, religion of America. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from passing a law which establishes a religion for the United States of America. If another 9-11 type “terrorist” incident takes place, and Martial Law is declared, it is likely that the claim would be made that since the Noahide Laws have been recognized by Congress as the “basis of our civilization” and that according to the third Noahide Law, anyone who worships Jesus Christ violates this law, he or she may be characterized as a terrorist. Then the Talmudic penalty for violating any of the Noahide Laws, namely decapitation, would be enforced.
No American should underestimate the ferocity of the commitment of the Zionist Jews to control the entire political system of the world through the One World Government now being created, and in so doing administer “Justice” as they define it.
The main goal of the Zionist Jews and their New World Order is exactly the same as it was when Jesus was on earth – to exterminate Christ – and His followers! Nothing has changed.
Beheading by Guillotine has “gone mainstream”
The ICD-9 Coding book was developed by the World Health Organization and contains a list of every possible medical diagnosis. This Coding book is used by every hospital and doctors’ office for billing purposes. Each diagnosis has a specific code.

In the last few years, a specific code for Beheading by Guillotine has been added to this Coding book:
Billing Code ICD-9 E978: Executions and Beheadings
As Obama Care was being implemented, another item was added to the reform of the American Medical industry: the shift to the international medical codes.
In conjunction with Obama Care, every American citizen under international codes to link us to this new, “international” system. This International Classification of Diseases (IDC) is part of the part of the “medical coding” under (WHO) the World Health Organization. This basically gives our health information to the United Nations.
As of October 1, 2014, the ICD 9 coding has an additional 86,000 codes. ICD-10-PCS (Procedure Code System) “mandated” medical coding will add 68,105 codes. There will be 155,000 medical codes for medical professionals to learn and peruse for each patient.
One of the most gruesome medical codes being added is E978. Apparently, it is a billable claim number, although I have to wonder who would ever file such a claim for reimbursement under medicaid, medicare, or any other program.
E978
ICD 9 E 978 “Legal Execution”
All executions performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority as:
•asphyxiation by gas
•beheading, decapitation (by guillotine)
•capital punishment •electrocution •hanging •poisoning •shooting
•other specified means
FEMA Camps (Federal Emergency Management Agency) There is evidence that all FEMA Camps contain guillotines!
FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN AMERICA

There over 800 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should Martial Law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached. Ask yourself if you really want to be on THE list.
The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons. Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.
The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people.
The problem is that illegal immigrants have NOT been placed in these camps. These camps are obviously for (legal) American citizens, particularly those who don’t agree with the Communist takeover of America!
Now let’s review the justification for any actions taken…
Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for over 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen…
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every

aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA’s Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA’s role as a “new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis.” FEMA’s powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate the National Security Act of 1947. It allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.
1950 Defense Production Act gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy.
Act of August 29, 1916 authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.
30,000 Guillotines in USA kill 30
million people in a 10 hour day?!
ANJA SCHOENWALD·THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2015·
Important whistleblowers include:
-Ex-FBI leader and head of the Los Angeles FBI Ted Gunderson
-Ex-CIA agent Bill Pawelec
-Ex-NSA agent A.C. Griffith
.
The 30,000 modern Guillotines in USA can kill 30 million people in a 10 hour day?! 1 Guillotine can kill about 100 people per hour.
30,000 Guillotines can kill about 3 million people per hour, and 30 million people in a 10 hour day. http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/06/29/why-does-the-government-need- guillotines/

.
FEMA ordered 102,000 boxcars with shackles and guillotines. (See sub-links as well.)
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/11/381946.shtml
.
30,000 Guillotines in America.
http://www.remnantofgod.org/guillotines.htm
.
Why does the US Government need 30,000 Guillotines, over 800 prison camps in the United States, and over 600 Million rounds of hollow point bullets? See executive orders and FEMA camp locations. http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/31-31/16193-why-does-the-us- government-needhave-30000-guillotines-and-over-600-million-rounds-of-hollow- point-bullets
.
Guillotines are cost cutting, because they eliminate the manufacture and appropriate storage of:

  • Ammunition
  • Poison for lethal injections
  • Unnecessary electricity
  • Beheading with a clean fast cut leaves organs intact, … and as of now, organs are expensive.
    .
    Horror as patient wakes up in NY hospital with doctors trying to harvest her organs for transplant profits http://www.naturalnews.com/041152_transplant_patients_organ_harvesting_presu med_consent.html
    .
    HB 1274 Death penalty; guillotine provisions http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/Archives/19951996/leg/fulltext/hb1274.htm .
    See the full archive: http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/Archives/19951996/leg/list/hb1200l.htm
    .
    Former military officer blows the whistle about the guillotines in USA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ujX8evzRXN0
    .
    Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/03/obama-dhs-purchases-2700-light- armored-tanks-to-go-with-their-1-6-billion-bullet-stockpile/
    .
    A critical analysis of Martial Law and FEMA camps. https://thevictoryhour.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/shut-up-youre-just-paranoid- a-critical-analysis-of-corporate-fascism-martial-law-and-fema-camps/
    .
    Everybody, please consider ‘educating’ people about this as suggested by the speaker at the end. This video provides a lot of information in a rather short time. https://youtu.be/1rwmD4c_NxI
    .
    According to the GEORGIA Guidestones, … only the 500 MILLION people are to remain as World Population. Guillotines to be a part of the puzzle? https://www.facebook.com/notes/anja-schoenwald/planned-mass-genocide-of- over-6-billion-people-georgia-guidestones-un-population/10152374285377116

https://goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/dr_day/Communist%20Takeover%20of%20US%20and%20World.pdf

I am having a nightmare…and I can’t wake up

Thomas Lifson

There is some good news today, but the nightmarish dimensions of the problems facing the American Republic are also coming into horrifying focus.  Alcoholics and others who embrace a 12-step solution to intractable addiction problems tell us that we have to hit bottom before we can take effective action.  Well, the nightmare unfolding may be our collective version of hitting bottom and recognizing the real problem.

First, the good news:

Despite the media chorus and the likes of Chris Christie urging capitulation, the lawsuits contesting key states are alive and well, and following the legal and constitutional channels.

Just The News:

President Trump’s campaign said it scored two victories Monday in its effort to contest results in several key battleground states, as Michigan state legislators agreed to hold a hearing into election irregularities while a federal appeals court expedited proceedings to consider Trump’s legal challenge in Pennsylvania.

The developments were announced by Trump campaign senior legal counsel Jenna Ellis, who said the GOP-led Michigan House would hold its hearing at 9 a.m. on Wednesday.

Read the whole thing.

WUMW (an NPR station in Milwaukee):

In this week’s Capitol Notes, WUWM’s Marti Mikkelson asked JR Ross of wispolitics.com what happens next.

“Well, this is all about going to court.  Traditionally in Wisconsin, when you have a recount, all you do is take the ballots and feed them back from machines and count a second time. That’s not what the petition that the Trump campaign filed. It’s more about trying to disqualify tens of thousands of ballots that were cast by people who are following the orders or the advice, the directions, they were given by state and local election officials,” says Ross.

The Trump campaign has several different arguments it is trying to bring before the courts but all center around procedural matters of absentee voting that have been in place since before the 2016 election.

“The Trump campaign is arguing that these voters did not follow the letter of the law, therefore their vote shouldn’t be counted. That’s kind of an unusual request and I don’t know how far it’ll get with the courts but that’s where we’re heading eventually,” he says.

Georgia

Shipwreckedcrew, a veteran former federal prosecutor, writes in RedState: “The Trump Campaign Has a Very Real Chance to Overturn the Election Result in Georgia.”

For anything to have even a remote chance of changing when it comes to the outcome of the Electoral College, the current status of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia must change. …

[T]he approach seems to be a normal election contest that will take place in Georgia state court, and the evidence may be coming into focus that gives the Campaign a legitimate chance to reverse the outcome.  The margin of Biden’s win in Georgia is only 12,500 votes, and the Trump campaign has requested a machine recount which they are entitled to under Georgia law given the narrow margin.  After that, I am expecting that the Campaign will file a Petition to Challenge the election as explained in more detail below.

Again, read the whole thing.

After some confusion, it looks as though the Trump recount effort is aligning with the Loeffler/Purdue campaigns, on which depends control of the Senate and the fate of the Republic, probably.  Newsmax:

Sens. David Perdue, R-Ga., and Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., endorsed President Donald Trump’s call for a second round of the election results in the state, insisting on a signature match of absentee ballots with those on voter registration lists.

After some strife and confusion, it is now being acknowledged that two different theories of election fraud are being independently followed by the Trump legal team headed by Rudy Giuliani, and the Sidney Powell independent effort pursuing the voting machine fraud.  Breitbart reports:

Monday, during an appearance on Fox Business Network’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani responded to a question about his team’s decision to announce a break with Sidney Powell on Sunday.

Giuliani attributed it to his pursuit of a different theory than Powell’s approach and proceeded to lay out his effort.

“I think it’s because we’re pursuing two different theories,” he said. “Our theory of the case to get to the Supreme Court now in four places — and it’s soon going to be in two others, and there’ll be an overall lawsuit — is basically misconduct of the election by state officials in at least five or six different states in which the misconduct of the election involved depravation of constitutional rights for the president. For example, in one part of the state, you could fix a ballot, Democrat part. Other part of the state, you couldn’t fix a ballot. One part of the state, the ballots were examined. The other part of the state, they didn’t care if the ballots were examined. In Pennsylvania, there are 680,000 unexamined ballots that virtually were put in secretly by Democrats alone. That’s outrageous. That is misconduct of the election.”

Read the whole thing.

These efforts are all crucial.  If they succeed, and President Trump prevails in proving and obtaining effective remedy for the stolen election, then the following nightmares can be addressed.

Nightmare #1

The most important United States attorney is the one heading the Washington, D.C. district.  That important post is currently occupied by an acting U.S. attorney named Michael R. Sherwin,  not confirmed by the Senate.  And he is declining to investigate an outrageous, murderous attack on a sitting United States senator.  Rand Paul tweeted yesterday:

Reports indicated that some of the thugs were followed to expensive hotels, making it obvious that they enjoyed funding from unknown sources.  Nothing could be more destructive of our political order than organized bands of thugs, financed and dispatched to where “muscle” is needed, with their backers enjoying immunity.  Does the word “brownshirts” mean anything to you?  (Kids, check Duckduckgo.)

Nightmare #2

David Horowitz has written a defining account of how the Democrat party came to be taken over by the hard left, intent on turning the Republic into a one-party state where dissent is punished — basically, our version of East Germany.  David was right there when it started with the anti–Vietnam War movement, where the radicals infiltrated academia, politics, cultural institutions, media, and eventually corporations.  I was there, too, to a lesser extent than David, and I confirm everything he says.  In my own case, I watched in amazement as the mighty Harvard University capitulated to the left after radical students took over University Hall, housing the president’s office.  The strategy was to concede and hope to co-opt the radicals.  In the end, it was Harvard and the establishment that it represents that were co-opted.

I urge you to read David’s account in its entirety.  His first two paragraphs send the basic message, that we have “hit bottom” (my term), so we must recognize that we are “in a war” (his term) so that we can — at last — fight back effectively.

By now it should be obvious — even to conservatives — that we are in a war. It is a conflict that began nearly fifty years ago when the street revolutionaries of the Sixties joined the Democrat Party. Their immediate goal was to help the Communist enemy win the war in Vietnam, but they stayed to expand their influence in the Democrat Party and create the radical force that confronts us today. The war that today’s Democrats are engaged in reflects the values and methods of those radicals. It is a war against us — against individual freedom, against America’s constitutional order, and against the capitalist engine of our prosperity.

Democrat radicals know what they want and where they are going. As a result, they are tactically and organizationally years ahead of patriotic Americans who are only beginning to realize they are in a war. The Democrats’ plan to steal the 2020 election was hatched many years ago when Democrats launched their first attacks on Voter I.D.s, and then every effort to secure the integrity of the electoral system. Those attacks metastasized into an all-out assault on Election Day itself with early- and late-voting grace periods, and a flood of 92 million mail-in ballots, hundreds of thousands of which were delivered in the middle of the night to be counted behind the backs of Republican observers after Election Day had passed.

Nightmare #3

I rarely recommend readers invest more than two or three minutes in a video.  I find that the message in most videos could be more quickly grasped in print.  But this video by Paul Joseph Watson is very entertainingly and effectively put together, explaining how “They think you’re stupid.”  He focuses on “The Great Reset,” the name the left has chosen for its hiding-in-plain-sight plan to use the coronavirus scamdemic as the excuse the re-order our political economy putting the governments controlled by oligarchs in charge of everything, doling out rewards to a dependent populace.

Watson’s quick cutting between outright admission of The Great Reset and then suppression of mention of it as conspiracy theory is priceless and cannot be equaled in effectiveness by the printed word.

Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, where oligarchs commune with officialdom, is not shy about proclaiming the plan.  He even wrote a book about it:


Via Amazon.com.

Schwab is taken seriously by the richest and most powerful members of the oligarchy.


YouTube screen grab.

I don’t think he can possibly be a nutjob, a Trekkie with too much power.  But what can I make of his dressing up in a Star Trekkish costume behind a lectern decorated with cultish symbols, rather like a Bond villain?  Is he yanking our chains and glorying in our helplessness?  Remember, “they think you’re stupid.”


Twitter screeng rab.

We know what happens to Bond villains in the end. Maybe my nightmare will have a happy ending when enough of us wake up.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/i_am_having_a_nightmare_and_i_cant_wake_up_yet.html

Analyzing The Worst Election Chicanery In US History – With The 2020 Election A Total Fraud, It’s Time For Patriots Nationwide To Become ‘Ungovernable’

– Conservatives must rise up against the Democrats legacy of corruption

By John C. Velisek – US Navy, Retired – All News Pipeline

Our general election was a fraud. The methods and manners of election fraud are numerous. The talking heads and progressive socialists continue to blather that there is no evidence of voter fraud. They expect the American people to nod and go along with the pronouncements they make. They keep claiming that the lawsuits the President has filed and will continue to file are without merit. The media has not investigated any of these lawsuits, which were mostly filed by individual groups of citizens, and were rejected by the respective states’ sycophantic justices. 

The mainstream media, who spent almost four years on the Russian collusion hoax, see no reason to contest this election, even though they never conceded to President Trump. The hypocrisy is astounding. The progressive socialists and Never Trumpers continue to lie about having no evidence of voter fraud. In the next breath, demand that President Trump’s lawyers turn over all evidence without going to court. I am trying to decide if this is because they are unaware that the evidence will be shown in court shortly or just want the opportunity to spew forth the lies. 

In “The Election Debacle Part 1” I discussed the evidence that is already a fact that has been shown in the past two weeks. In part 2, I will continue to deliver the facts as they are, ask questions about the media coverage, or lack thereof. 

In Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, the input of ballots snuck in in the middle of the night has been found to be true. These fraudulent ballots were inputted to decrease the lead that President Trump held. These vote dumps all followed the same process. 

In Michigan and Wisconsin, these unchecked, unverified ballots showed 138,339 voted for Biden and zero for Trump. Does this seem viable to anybody? The MSM neglect to mention anything about these ballots and refuse to let anyone else discuss it. Put it on Twitter or Facebook, and you can expect it to be censored. In Michigan, these ballots overcame an almost 800,000 vote lead for Trump, and in Wisconsin, these ballots were used to overcome a 4 point lead for Trump. It should be noted that these fake ballots were delivered when the voting count was supposedly stopped. 

The two Republicans on the canvassing board in Wayne county have been ridiculed, their children threatened and doxxed to the unruly mobs in Progressive socialist control to intimidate them into certifying the result after they had already voted no. Because of the intimidation into changing their votes, the officials claim they can no longer change the votes back to no. 

Another anomaly that has yet to be explained is that Detroit Democrat officials claimed that the machines could not read the military ballots they received and proceeded to fill out new ballots without any Republican poll watchers present, this is a felony according to federal and State law, and those filling out the ballots need to be held responsible. Is this the reason that they locked the doors and boarded up the windows, refusing to let the Republican pool watchers into the office? 

(ANP EMERGENCY FUNDRAISERDue to unexpected medical and emergency repair billsplease consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this ‘Info-war’ for America at this most critical time in US history, during a time of systematic ‘big tech’ censorship and widespread Democrat corruption.)

In Wisconsin, the recounts, again without any verification of the ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties, were paid by the Trump campaign committee because the State refused to do an audit. Perhaps that is because they do not have to explain why seven districts in Milwaukee reported more votes than registered voters by a wide margin. They are claiming that the city of Milwaukee had a record turnout of 84%. Perhaps if they include dead voters, voters who have moved, and illegal votes, they can claim that number. The voter turnout in 2016 was 67%. Seven districts in Milwaukee have reported voting higher than 100% of voters, and one had a count of 202%. Again, silence from the mainstream media and social media. 

Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos has asked the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Election to review how the election was administered. Republican Party of Wisconsin Chairman Andrew Hitt called out the process and administration of the vote as well. Surprisingly, the MSM and social media have not covered this, and once again, if mentioned, the discussion is censored. 

The Wisconsin Elections commission let the door open when it refused to clean up the voter rolls, allowing those who had moved and dead people to be a ready database for voter fraud. A circuit court judge ruled that these purges from the database must be completed. The elections commission ignored this ruling and was found in contempt of court. The names remain, allowing the fraud to continue. Because of a lawsuit by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case but has put off a decision until after the Presidential election. 

The Wisconsin Election Commission also allowed local county election clerks to “cure” spoiled ballots by filling in addresses even though those spoiled ballots should have been invalidated. Also used was the “indefinitely confined” premise to be used on over 200,000 votes that were not verified. “Indenfitely confined” voters were not required to show any type of identification.

After Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gablemn had ruled that Wisconsin Stature 6.86 ruled that if an absentee ballot does not have a witness or address on it, it is not valid. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was found to have actually instructed clerks to illegally fill in these sections so that the votes would count. The Wisconsin Elections Commission affirmed Wisconsin 6.87 (6D) in a memo sent out in August that an incomplete mail-in ballot would not be counted, and in Mid October issued a directive giving clerks authority against the state law to fix incomplete ballots. 

In both Wisconsin and Michigan, Democrat officials refused to explain Biden’s sudden rise in the vote tally but felt the need to demand that misinformation would not be condoned. They have yet to explain how votes were received at 6 am, or how these votes were 100% for Biden. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a progressive socialist Democrat, asked everyone to stop spreading misinformation that was true. 

She didn’t want the information to spread and refused to explain or give any indication that there was a problem. In the same vein, Michigan Department of State spokesperson Aneta Kiersnowski, another far-left Democrat, declared that pairs of election workers, one from each political party, work to tabulate ballots to ensure fairness. This is a total lie when one looks at Detroit. 

In Georgia, the Secretary of State intends to certify the count soon. A recount that was done is invalid. The mainstream media will call the recount an audit. They feel that this will placate the residents of the State, counting on their assumption that the citizens are too stupid to understand the difference between a recount an audit. In the recount, no ballots were verified, and no signatures were matched. They just counted the invalid votes that they had already certified. Republicans were not allowed to have the watchers required to prevent any illegal votes or question the vote in any way. There were ballots coming in the morning after the election. Georgia officials told the poll watchers that they had concluded the counting until the next morning, and after the poll watchers had left, continued counting the newly received ballots. 

Democratic operatives have already started a campaign to doxx lawyers who are fighting for electoral integrity. The media, mainstream and social will continue to demonize whistleblowers, legitimate journalists, and political officials that do not bow to the agenda of the progressive socialist New World Order. One Trump attorney Linda Kerns, who is working on voter fraud, has been placed under the protection of US Marshalls because of threats of harm by a lawyer from the firm representing Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar. She has also received abusive emails, phone calls, physical and economic threats, and accusations of treason. 

In Pennsylvania, Republican ballot inspectors were denied access to an area where they would have the opportunity to be a part of the process. In six, deeply blue counties, officials allowed voters to “cure” or make changes to their ballots that would have been disqualified if the officials in charge actually followed the law. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled last month that mail-in ballots were not to be provided the same “curing” that in-person voting allowed. 

The Secretary of State, Kathy Boockvar, violated this election decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and allowed Democrat mail-in ballots for Biden to be verified and counted. Local election boards gave the information on these invalid ballots to Progressive socialist party activists so they could be corrected in violation of the Supreme Court ruling, but only if they were votes for Biden. 

In a suit filed by Thomas Breth, it was made clear that it was illegal for the counties that were Democratic strongholds to create their own standards, their own procedures in the area of disqualified ballots. The state election code forbids reaching out to voters to have their votes changed. This process was widespread and never sanctioned by the state assembly. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court was complicit in allowing the counting of ballots with late or no postmarks. 

Going by the name “The Great Reset” is just another attempt to steal the election in order to subjugate the American people. Threats, violence, and doxxing for the mobs have now become a way of life for the progressive socialist Democrats and their minions. This nationwide voter fraud will not be allowed to stand. Patriots in this country will rise up if this election continues to be stolen. 

No amount of violence or threats will force the American people to submit to the John Kerry wing of socialist globalism. George Soros will not be able to walk away without being damaged. There are repercussions to what they are attempting. They talk of a civil war. The civil war will turn into more than they have bargained for.

https://allnewspipeline.com/Its_Time_For_Patriots_Nationwide_To_Become_Ungovernable.php

How America’s Adams Family Inherited And Preserved The Pilgrim Mind

Through America’s first century, the heritage of the Mayflower was notably strong in John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Charles Francis Adams, and Henry Adams.By Susan Hanssen

The following essay is part of The Federalist’s 1620 Project, a symposium exploring the connections and contributions of the early Pilgrim and Puritan settlers in New England to the uniquely American synthesis of faith, family, freedom, and self-government.

In his account of the 1620 voyage of the Mayflower, William Bradford wrote that “they knew they were pilgrimes, & looked not much on these things; but lift up their eyes to ye heavens, their dearest cuntrie.” This Augustinian distinction between the earthly and heavenly city — the profoundly Judeo-Christian sense of being strangers, wayfarers, pilgrims, exiles from the heavenly city of Jerusalem — is a haunting inheritance of American culture.

The Pilgrims are distinguished from the larger Puritan movement by their anti-Erastianism — they rejected Thomas Erastus’s insistence that the state is superior to the church. Against both Cavaliers and Roundheads — the High Church Episcopalians wanting the authority of the king’s appointed bishops or the congregationalist churches which accepted the Cromwellian Parliament’s control over ecclesiastical matters — Pilgrims insisted on the liberty of the church.

One hears this Pilgrim inheritance in the haunting song that Cecil Spring Rice wrote on seeing the funeral monument Henry Adams built for his wife, a figure in the pose of thoughtful reflection on immortality:

I vow to thee, my country all earthly things above,
Entire and whole and perfect, the service of my love.
And there’s another country, I’ve heard of long ago,
Most dear to them that love her, most great to them that know;
We may not count her armies, we may not see her King;
Her fortress is a faithful heart, her pride is suffering;
And soul by soul and silently her shining bounds increase,
And her ways are ways of gentleness, and all her paths are peace.

The Adams family were heirs of this Pilgrim distinction between the duties rendered to Caesar and the duties rendered to God.

We often think of the American Founding in terms of the “Virginia Dynasty” — Jefferson, Madison, Monroe — a series of slaveholding southerners who helped to transform the new republican nation into a democratic continental empire. But there is another “American Dynasty” more representative of a deep strain of Christian conservatism that preserved the American revolution from the political utopianism of the French Revolution of 1789 and the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

The idea that the eighteenth century is an indiscriminate “Age of Revolutions” — that one can lump 1688, 1776, 1789 and all the successor revolutions in Latin America and across Europe until one meets up with the 1848 year of revolutions that inspired Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” — is a massive interpretive swindle on the American public.

In truth, “America’s First Dynasty,” the Adams family, stood athwart this interpretation of the American Founding since the beginning: Americans were first and foremost Pilgrims at heart, deeply imbued with a Lutheran conviction of the total depravity of man and the impossibility of building here any heavenly city. The Christian sense of sin — “a stain inherited from my greatest-grandmother’s birth,” as Henry Adams put it — constantly restrained the modern impulse to “immanentize the eschaton.”

As Jean Bethke Elshtain has shown repeatedly in her life’s work, an Augustinian skepticism about the City of Man ever achieving perfection runs throughout American culture and politics. Christian political realism has been challenged repeatedly by Unitarianism, Romantic Transcendentalism, and Progressivism, but it remains a powerful strain in American life that cannot be overlooked.

The heritage of the Mayflower was particularly strong in John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Charles Francis Adams, and Henry Adams who, across four generations, spans the first century of American history. As Henry Adams, great-grandson of the patriot founder, wrote in retrospect in “The Education of Henry Adams:”

The atmosphere of education in which he lived was colonial, revolutionary, almost Cromwellian, as though he were steeped, from his greatest grandmother’s birth, in the odor of political crime. Resistance to something was the law of New England nature; the boy looked out on the world with the instinct of resistance; for numberless generations, his predecessors had viewed the world chiefly as a thing to be reformed, filled with evil forces to be abolished, and they saw no reason to suppose that they had wholly succeeded in the abolition.

“The law of New England nature” in which he was “steeped from his greatest grandmother’s birth” was “the instinct of resistance to something,” “for numberless generations his predecessors had viewed the world chiefly as a thing … filled with evil forces to be abolished.” Russell Kirk took this “Adams Dynasty” to be the backbone of “The Conservative Mind“ in America, contributing in each generation a break on political utopianism.

John Adams Against The World

“My opinion is, and always has been, that absolute power intoxicates alike despots, monarchs, aristocrats, and democrats, and Jacobins, and sans-culottes,” wrote John Adams. David McCullough’s biography and HBO mini-series softens and makes amiable John and Abigail in a way that does them a disservice. In truth, Adamses all have a tendency to become angry blogger dudes in their old age, full of sharp intelligence and bitterness.

John Adams is not often read because his works are interminable Jeremiads (like the recent letters of Archbishop Vigano). Adams’s “Defence of the Constitutions” uses all ancient and modern republican constitutions as considered by all ancient and modern philosophers and historians (its “Table of Contents” is alone formidable) to refute repeatedly and ad nauseam every argument of Turgot and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who favor a simple, straight-forward, democratic absolutism.

His “Discourses on Davila“ is a similarly long and detailed diatribe against the Marquis de Condorcet’s confidence in humanity’s natural benevolence, which can allow us to divest ourselves of constitutional restraints, checks, balances, and separation of powers. His series of letters to Thomas Jefferson over the course of their retirement counter Jefferson’s enlightenment trust in democratic processes with the need for the conservation of a culture, a “we the people” prior to the political regime, of piety and virtue:

We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Gallantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net [Here’s lookin’ at you, Moby Dick!]. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Adams, like George Washington, believed that no polity could eradicate the sinfulness of man, so any man who disparaged the place of morality and religion in public life was a traitor.

John Adams and Jefferson dueled for decades over whether a Christian anthropology or a French Enlightenment anthropology underlay the American regime. It was a fight to the death over who would control history’s judgment on the American Founding, a replay of the great presidential election of 1800. Adams wrote monthly; Jefferson responded at  leisure — annually. In the end, it was a question of who would outlive whom.

Jefferson passed away in the morning of the Fourth of July, 1826 at Monticello — 50 years to the day from the promulgation of the Declaration of Independence. Adams died the same day, in the evening, whispering “Jefferson still lives,” not knowing that he had survived his intellectual and political adversary by hours.

In reality, Adams survived Jefferson by decades, in his son, his grandson, and his great-grandson. Only in 1947, would the Supreme Court’s Everson decision resurrect Jefferson’s idea of a “wall of separation” between church and state, just as Kirk made his great attempt to recover the Adams family tradition for American conservatives in his 1953 classic.

John Adams reaches his rhetorical climax when objecting to the idea that man is a mere materialistic clash of atoms — Lego blocks to be worked and reworked according to the purposes of the collective need (transgenderism, transhumanism) — with no form, soul, or nature to which the polity must conform itself:

Is there a possibility that the government of nations may fall into the hands of men who teach the most disconsolate of all creeds, that men are but fireflies, and that all this is without a father? … Is this the way to make man, as man, an object of respect? Or, is it to make murder itself as indifferent as shooting a plover, and the extermination of the Rohilla nation as innocent as the swallowing of mites on a morsel of cheese? If such a case should happen, would not one of these, the most credulous of all believers, have reason to pray to his eternal nature or his almighty chance … give us again the gods of the Greeks; give us again the more intelligible as well as more comfortable systems of Athanasius and Calvin; nay, give us again our popes and hierarchies, Benedictines and Jesuits, with all their superstition and fanaticism, impostures and tyrannyA certain duchess of venerable years and masculine understanding, said of some of the philosophers of the eighteenth century, admirably well, — ‘On ne croit pas dans le Christianisme, mais on croit toutes les sottises possibles ‘(Having ceased believing in Christianity, they believe in all possible nonsense.)

With a series of piled up rhetorical questions, Adams throws his opponents back, back, back, ending with a “Touché.” “Sot!”

In his objection to the idea of the fluidity and mutability of human nature, John Adams resonates with Czeslaw Milosz a century later, the Polish poet laureate who argues that the ultimate enemy of the Communist regime is not the propertied class, Kulaks, and capitalists, the nations and churches which prevent man from recognizing himself as purely proletariat worker, but “Man, This Enemy” — human nature itself, born anew in every generation, with its desire for truth and freedom, is the ultimate enemy of the totalitarian state.

The absence of any realistic account of human nature leaves the human mind vulnerable to be “captivated” by “ideology” — by histories that purport to tell of the evolution and progress of the human towards some final perfect state within time.

John Quincy Adams Against the World

Seeing how unpopular John Adams’s disdain for absolute democracy made him, John Quincy Adams tried desperately to conform himself to the modern democratic age in order to stay electable: he was the first American president to wear pants. The 18th-century gentleman, who “looked his land” in silk hose and breeches, and considered property essential to being a participating member of the “Publick,” had been put aside in favor of the Jacksonian democrats “pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps.”

The alliance between upstart southwestern planters and the property-less Irish of the booming cities of the north was unstoppable in presidential politics in the 1830s and 1840s. No Boston Brahmin, no patrician WASPs need apply. Working men’s garb, the sans-culottes of the French Revolution became the fashion in the 1830s.

But, at heart, John Quincy could never conform to the sheer voice of the majority: the Democratic Party that captured the nation was in his eyes the “Slave Power” and his old age was poisoned by his one-issue obsession with slavery. His wife, Louisa Catherine Adams, agonized in her diary that his political obsession — his angry blogger dude post-presidential career, the only American president who returned to the House of Representatives after his presidency, and persisted until he dropped on the floor of the House — would destroy their family and bring the country at last to civil war.

Perhaps John Quincy Adams’s most memorable post-presidential performance was his tenacious fight for the liberty of a group of mutinous slaves. In his majestic closing statement in the Amistad case, Quincy appeals to the judges’ “fear of the Lord” rather than their natural benevolence. He reminds them of all the Supreme Court justices who had died and been replaced during the long years during which the Amistad case had been before the courts, and bid them consider, whether at their deaths they too will hear from their Maker the final judgment: “Come, good and faithful servant, enter into the joy of your master.” Vox populi, expressed in either executive fiat or positive law, could not overrule “the laws of Nature and Nature’s God.” “Hic cestus, artemque reponat.”

John Quincy Adams portrays himself as old Entellus from Virgil’s “Aeneid,” an old warrior returned from his deathbed for one final duel, the Ents of Onodrim returned for the defense of Middle Earth. It is a persona, the literary pose of Jeremiah, that the Adamses embodied in every generation.

Charles Francis Adams Against the World

John Quincy Adams’s son is largely unknown, but Charles Francis Adams helped to found the Free Soil party, a third party that eventually helped birth the Republican Party. He acted as Abraham Lincoln’s “man in Havana” — ambassador to Great Britain throughout the American Civil War. Lincoln tasked him with preventing the British from entering the war on the side of the Southern Confederacy, as the cotton mills of northern England fell silent without American cotton.

As his son, Henry Adams wrote, the Adams family watched the Whig hope in political compromise with the Slave Power, watched the progression from Northwest Ordinance to Missouri Compromise, to Great Compromise of 1850, with skepticism. The Adamses, “saw no reason to suppose that they had wholly succeeded in the abolition.”

They were not shocked, surprised, or stunned by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Repeal of the Missouri Compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and the ascendancy of the Slave Power in the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches. They had never succumbed to the facile belief that “human nature worked for Good, and three instruments were all she asked — Suffrage, Common Schools, and Press. … Man needed only a correct knowledge of facts to reach perfection.”

Indeed, Charles Francis Adams launched the third-party movement that eventually broke the power of the Democratic city machine that had controlled American politics for three decades.

Henry Adams Against the World

Henry Adams found it impossible to be truly Bostonian — either Unitarian or Transcendentalist. He could not conform himself to Daniel Webster’s Whiggish belief in progress, nor the Hegelian dream of a utopian state of Emerson, Thoreau, and Alcott. To him, as to his Puritan forebears, sin was metaphysical, not social. The remedy for sin was supernatural, not political:

The religious instinct had vanished, and could not be revived, although one made in later life many efforts to recover it. That the most powerful emotion of man, next to the sexual, should disappear, might be a personal defect of his own; but that the most intelligent society, led by the most intelligent clergy, in the most moral conditions he ever knew, should have solved all the problems of the universe so thoroughly as to have quite ceased making itself anxious about past or future, and should have persuaded itself that all the problems which had convulsed human thought from earliest recorded time, were not worth discussing, seemed to him the most curious social phenomenon he had to account for in a long life.

The faculty of turning away one’s eyes as one approaches a chasm is not unusual, and Boston showed, under Webster’s lead, how successfully it could be done in politics; but in politics, a certain number of men did at least protest. In religion and philosophy, no one protested.

Such protest as was made took forms more simple than the silence, like the deism of Theodore Parker, and of the boy’s own cousin Octavius Frothingham, who distressed his father and scandalized Beacon Street by avowing skepticism that seemed to solve no old problems, and to raise many new ones. The less aggressive protest of Ralph Waldo Emerson, was, from an old-world point of view, less serious. It was naïf.

The utopianism of either the Whig compromisers in national politics or of the small, local groups like the Oneida community and Concord Farm — variations on the Puritan vision of establishing “a city upon a hill” — did not suit the sharp vision of the ineradicable nature of sin. Such attempts were, in Adams’s judgment, “naive.”

Late in life, Henry Adams turned away from the bizarre dynamism of progressive revolutions creating ever more absolute and invasive governments in pursuit of social perfection. He observed the French 1901 Law of Associations and the 1905 Separation law establishing state secularism. The confiscation of church property in France, challenges to church control of the marriage law, or church preeminence in the field of education all drew comment from Adams.

He was consistently appalled at the naivete of the churches in thinking that they could survive being regulated by the state authorities. “I see, almost without noting it — so universal is the sensation — that the Holy Father is complaining bitterly of the same thing. He has now complained for some five hundred years, but it is queer that I should have caught up with him.”

At last, Henry Adams’s inner Pilgrim rebelled. Like the anti-Erastian John Henry Newman, he turned at last to the medieval devotion to the Virgin, Regina et Mater Ecclesia — a church independent of any national power. He acknowledged that it was the strangest place for an “American of the Americans, with who knows how many Puritans and Patriots in his lineage” to find himself, kneeling in an empty church praying his “mea culpas” after 500 years of protest.

But, he reassured himself, the Adamses were Normans, so it was his Norman ancestors who had built the cathedrals and fought the crusades. Like T. S. Eliot in the quiet chapel at Little Gidding: “In my end is my beginning.”

America’s Pilgrim Inheritance — The Liberty Of The Church

Paradoxically, as the Pilgrims of 1620 fled the control of the king’s authority over the church, many a Catholic and Jew fled the control of the state over the church in the 1920s and 1930s. The Bolshevik regime confiscated church property, sold chalices and chasubles on the black market, and infiltrated seminaries. The Nazis purged schools and churches of teachers and ministers who objected to their national socialist agenda.

Yet the wake of these horrible circumstances saw a new immigration of artists, philosophers, scientists, political thinkers, poets, ministers, and teachers — Jacques and Raissa Maritain, Albert Einstein, Paul Tillich, Martin Buber, Czeslaw Milosz, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, Eva T. H. Brann, Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin. They came to American shores in the twentieth century seeking liberty to seek the truth; pilgrims who could never finally conform themselves to the Earthly City.Susan Hanssen is Associate Professor and Department Chair of History at the University of Dallas. She received her graduate degree in history from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and her undergraduate degree in history from Boston University. During the summer of 2008, she was an adjunct professor for the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation at Georgetown University and was the 2010-2011 Garwood Fellow at the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/24/how-americas-adams-family-inherited-and-preserved-the-pilgrim-mind/

How America’s Adams Family Inherited And Preserved The Pilgrim Mind

Through America’s first century, the heritage of the Mayflower was notably strong in John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Charles Francis Adams, and Henry Adams.By Susan Hanssen

The following essay is part of The Federalist’s 1620 Project, a symposium exploring the connections and contributions of the early Pilgrim and Puritan settlers in New England to the uniquely American synthesis of faith, family, freedom, and self-government.

In his account of the 1620 voyage of the Mayflower, William Bradford wrote that “they knew they were pilgrimes, & looked not much on these things; but lift up their eyes to ye heavens, their dearest cuntrie.” This Augustinian distinction between the earthly and heavenly city — the profoundly Judeo-Christian sense of being strangers, wayfarers, pilgrims, exiles from the heavenly city of Jerusalem — is a haunting inheritance of American culture.

The Pilgrims are distinguished from the larger Puritan movement by their anti-Erastianism — they rejected Thomas Erastus’s insistence that the state is superior to the church. Against both Cavaliers and Roundheads — the High Church Episcopalians wanting the authority of the king’s appointed bishops or the congregationalist churches which accepted the Cromwellian Parliament’s control over ecclesiastical matters — Pilgrims insisted on the liberty of the church.

One hears this Pilgrim inheritance in the haunting song that Cecil Spring Rice wrote on seeing the funeral monument Henry Adams built for his wife, a figure in the pose of thoughtful reflection on immortality:

I vow to thee, my country all earthly things above,
Entire and whole and perfect, the service of my love.
And there’s another country, I’ve heard of long ago,
Most dear to them that love her, most great to them that know;
We may not count her armies, we may not see her King;
Her fortress is a faithful heart, her pride is suffering;
And soul by soul and silently her shining bounds increase,
And her ways are ways of gentleness, and all her paths are peace.

The Adams family were heirs of this Pilgrim distinction between the duties rendered to Caesar and the duties rendered to God.

We often think of the American Founding in terms of the “Virginia Dynasty” — Jefferson, Madison, Monroe — a series of slaveholding southerners who helped to transform the new republican nation into a democratic continental empire. But there is another “American Dynasty” more representative of a deep strain of Christian conservatism that preserved the American revolution from the political utopianism of the French Revolution of 1789 and the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

The idea that the eighteenth century is an indiscriminate “Age of Revolutions” — that one can lump 1688, 1776, 1789 and all the successor revolutions in Latin America and across Europe until one meets up with the 1848 year of revolutions that inspired Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” — is a massive interpretive swindle on the American public.

In truth, “America’s First Dynasty,” the Adams family, stood athwart this interpretation of the American Founding since the beginning: Americans were first and foremost Pilgrims at heart, deeply imbued with a Lutheran conviction of the total depravity of man and the impossibility of building here any heavenly city. The Christian sense of sin — “a stain inherited from my greatest-grandmother’s birth,” as Henry Adams put it — constantly restrained the modern impulse to “immanentize the eschaton.”

As Jean Bethke Elshtain has shown repeatedly in her life’s work, an Augustinian skepticism about the City of Man ever achieving perfection runs throughout American culture and politics. Christian political realism has been challenged repeatedly by Unitarianism, Romantic Transcendentalism, and Progressivism, but it remains a powerful strain in American life that cannot be overlooked.

The heritage of the Mayflower was particularly strong in John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Charles Francis Adams, and Henry Adams who, across four generations, spans the first century of American history. As Henry Adams, great-grandson of the patriot founder, wrote in retrospect in “The Education of Henry Adams:”

The atmosphere of education in which he lived was colonial, revolutionary, almost Cromwellian, as though he were steeped, from his greatest grandmother’s birth, in the odor of political crime. Resistance to something was the law of New England nature; the boy looked out on the world with the instinct of resistance; for numberless generations, his predecessors had viewed the world chiefly as a thing to be reformed, filled with evil forces to be abolished, and they saw no reason to suppose that they had wholly succeeded in the abolition.

“The law of New England nature” in which he was “steeped from his greatest grandmother’s birth” was “the instinct of resistance to something,” “for numberless generations his predecessors had viewed the world chiefly as a thing … filled with evil forces to be abolished.” Russell Kirk took this “Adams Dynasty” to be the backbone of “The Conservative Mind“ in America, contributing in each generation a break on political utopianism.

John Adams Against The World

“My opinion is, and always has been, that absolute power intoxicates alike despots, monarchs, aristocrats, and democrats, and Jacobins, and sans-culottes,” wrote John Adams. David McCullough’s biography and HBO mini-series softens and makes amiable John and Abigail in a way that does them a disservice. In truth, Adamses all have a tendency to become angry blogger dudes in their old age, full of sharp intelligence and bitterness.

John Adams is not often read because his works are interminable Jeremiads (like the recent letters of Archbishop Vigano). Adams’s “Defence of the Constitutions” uses all ancient and modern republican constitutions as considered by all ancient and modern philosophers and historians (its “Table of Contents” is alone formidable) to refute repeatedly and ad nauseam every argument of Turgot and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who favor a simple, straight-forward, democratic absolutism.

His “Discourses on Davila“ is a similarly long and detailed diatribe against the Marquis de Condorcet’s confidence in humanity’s natural benevolence, which can allow us to divest ourselves of constitutional restraints, checks, balances, and separation of powers. His series of letters to Thomas Jefferson over the course of their retirement counter Jefferson’s enlightenment trust in democratic processes with the need for the conservation of a culture, a “we the people” prior to the political regime, of piety and virtue:

We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Gallantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net [Here’s lookin’ at you, Moby Dick!]. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Adams, like George Washington, believed that no polity could eradicate the sinfulness of man, so any man who disparaged the place of morality and religion in public life was a traitor.

John Adams and Jefferson dueled for decades over whether a Christian anthropology or a French Enlightenment anthropology underlay the American regime. It was a fight to the death over who would control history’s judgment on the American Founding, a replay of the great presidential election of 1800. Adams wrote monthly; Jefferson responded at  leisure — annually. In the end, it was a question of who would outlive whom.

Jefferson passed away in the morning of the Fourth of July, 1826 at Monticello — 50 years to the day from the promulgation of the Declaration of Independence. Adams died the same day, in the evening, whispering “Jefferson still lives,” not knowing that he had survived his intellectual and political adversary by hours.

In reality, Adams survived Jefferson by decades, in his son, his grandson, and his great-grandson. Only in 1947, would the Supreme Court’s Everson decision resurrect Jefferson’s idea of a “wall of separation” between church and state, just as Kirk made his great attempt to recover the Adams family tradition for American conservatives in his 1953 classic.

John Adams reaches his rhetorical climax when objecting to the idea that man is a mere materialistic clash of atoms — Lego blocks to be worked and reworked according to the purposes of the collective need (transgenderism, transhumanism) — with no form, soul, or nature to which the polity must conform itself:

Is there a possibility that the government of nations may fall into the hands of men who teach the most disconsolate of all creeds, that men are but fireflies, and that all this is without a father? … Is this the way to make man, as man, an object of respect? Or, is it to make murder itself as indifferent as shooting a plover, and the extermination of the Rohilla nation as innocent as the swallowing of mites on a morsel of cheese? If such a case should happen, would not one of these, the most credulous of all believers, have reason to pray to his eternal nature or his almighty chance … give us again the gods of the Greeks; give us again the more intelligible as well as more comfortable systems of Athanasius and Calvin; nay, give us again our popes and hierarchies, Benedictines and Jesuits, with all their superstition and fanaticism, impostures and tyrannyA certain duchess of venerable years and masculine understanding, said of some of the philosophers of the eighteenth century, admirably well, — ‘On ne croit pas dans le Christianisme, mais on croit toutes les sottises possibles ‘(Having ceased believing in Christianity, they believe in all possible nonsense.)

With a series of piled up rhetorical questions, Adams throws his opponents back, back, back, ending with a “Touché.” “Sot!”

In his objection to the idea of the fluidity and mutability of human nature, John Adams resonates with Czeslaw Milosz a century later, the Polish poet laureate who argues that the ultimate enemy of the Communist regime is not the propertied class, Kulaks, and capitalists, the nations and churches which prevent man from recognizing himself as purely proletariat worker, but “Man, This Enemy” — human nature itself, born anew in every generation, with its desire for truth and freedom, is the ultimate enemy of the totalitarian state.

The absence of any realistic account of human nature leaves the human mind vulnerable to be “captivated” by “ideology” — by histories that purport to tell of the evolution and progress of the human towards some final perfect state within time.

John Quincy Adams Against the World

Seeing how unpopular John Adams’s disdain for absolute democracy made him, John Quincy Adams tried desperately to conform himself to the modern democratic age in order to stay electable: he was the first American president to wear pants. The 18th-century gentleman, who “looked his land” in silk hose and breeches, and considered property essential to being a participating member of the “Publick,” had been put aside in favor of the Jacksonian democrats “pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps.”

The alliance between upstart southwestern planters and the property-less Irish of the booming cities of the north was unstoppable in presidential politics in the 1830s and 1840s. No Boston Brahmin, no patrician WASPs need apply. Working men’s garb, the sans-culottes of the French Revolution became the fashion in the 1830s.

But, at heart, John Quincy could never conform to the sheer voice of the majority: the Democratic Party that captured the nation was in his eyes the “Slave Power” and his old age was poisoned by his one-issue obsession with slavery. His wife, Louisa Catherine Adams, agonized in her diary that his political obsession — his angry blogger dude post-presidential career, the only American president who returned to the House of Representatives after his presidency, and persisted until he dropped on the floor of the House — would destroy their family and bring the country at last to civil war.

Perhaps John Quincy Adams’s most memorable post-presidential performance was his tenacious fight for the liberty of a group of mutinous slaves. In his majestic closing statement in the Amistad case, Quincy appeals to the judges’ “fear of the Lord” rather than their natural benevolence. He reminds them of all the Supreme Court justices who had died and been replaced during the long years during which the Amistad case had been before the courts, and bid them consider, whether at their deaths they too will hear from their Maker the final judgment: “Come, good and faithful servant, enter into the joy of your master.” Vox populi, expressed in either executive fiat or positive law, could not overrule “the laws of Nature and Nature’s God.” “Hic cestus, artemque reponat.”

John Quincy Adams portrays himself as old Entellus from Virgil’s “Aeneid,” an old warrior returned from his deathbed for one final duel, the Ents of Onodrim returned for the defense of Middle Earth. It is a persona, the literary pose of Jeremiah, that the Adamses embodied in every generation.

Charles Francis Adams Against the World

John Quincy Adams’s son is largely unknown, but Charles Francis Adams helped to found the Free Soil party, a third party that eventually helped birth the Republican Party. He acted as Abraham Lincoln’s “man in Havana” — ambassador to Great Britain throughout the American Civil War. Lincoln tasked him with preventing the British from entering the war on the side of the Southern Confederacy, as the cotton mills of northern England fell silent without American cotton.

As his son, Henry Adams wrote, the Adams family watched the Whig hope in political compromise with the Slave Power, watched the progression from Northwest Ordinance to Missouri Compromise, to Great Compromise of 1850, with skepticism. The Adamses, “saw no reason to suppose that they had wholly succeeded in the abolition.”

They were not shocked, surprised, or stunned by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Repeal of the Missouri Compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and the ascendancy of the Slave Power in the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches. They had never succumbed to the facile belief that “human nature worked for Good, and three instruments were all she asked — Suffrage, Common Schools, and Press. … Man needed only a correct knowledge of facts to reach perfection.”

Indeed, Charles Francis Adams launched the third-party movement that eventually broke the power of the Democratic city machine that had controlled American politics for three decades.

Henry Adams Against the World

Henry Adams found it impossible to be truly Bostonian — either Unitarian or Transcendentalist. He could not conform himself to Daniel Webster’s Whiggish belief in progress, nor the Hegelian dream of a utopian state of Emerson, Thoreau, and Alcott. To him, as to his Puritan forebears, sin was metaphysical, not social. The remedy for sin was supernatural, not political:

The religious instinct had vanished, and could not be revived, although one made in later life many efforts to recover it. That the most powerful emotion of man, next to the sexual, should disappear, might be a personal defect of his own; but that the most intelligent society, led by the most intelligent clergy, in the most moral conditions he ever knew, should have solved all the problems of the universe so thoroughly as to have quite ceased making itself anxious about past or future, and should have persuaded itself that all the problems which had convulsed human thought from earliest recorded time, were not worth discussing, seemed to him the most curious social phenomenon he had to account for in a long life.

The faculty of turning away one’s eyes as one approaches a chasm is not unusual, and Boston showed, under Webster’s lead, how successfully it could be done in politics; but in politics, a certain number of men did at least protest. In religion and philosophy, no one protested.

Such protest as was made took forms more simple than the silence, like the deism of Theodore Parker, and of the boy’s own cousin Octavius Frothingham, who distressed his father and scandalized Beacon Street by avowing skepticism that seemed to solve no old problems, and to raise many new ones. The less aggressive protest of Ralph Waldo Emerson, was, from an old-world point of view, less serious. It was naïf.

The utopianism of either the Whig compromisers in national politics or of the small, local groups like the Oneida community and Concord Farm — variations on the Puritan vision of establishing “a city upon a hill” — did not suit the sharp vision of the ineradicable nature of sin. Such attempts were, in Adams’s judgment, “naive.”

Late in life, Henry Adams turned away from the bizarre dynamism of progressive revolutions creating ever more absolute and invasive governments in pursuit of social perfection. He observed the French 1901 Law of Associations and the 1905 Separation law establishing state secularism. The confiscation of church property in France, challenges to church control of the marriage law, or church preeminence in the field of education all drew comment from Adams.

He was consistently appalled at the naivete of the churches in thinking that they could survive being regulated by the state authorities. “I see, almost without noting it — so universal is the sensation — that the Holy Father is complaining bitterly of the same thing. He has now complained for some five hundred years, but it is queer that I should have caught up with him.”

At last, Henry Adams’s inner Pilgrim rebelled. Like the anti-Erastian John Henry Newman, he turned at last to the medieval devotion to the Virgin, Regina et Mater Ecclesia — a church independent of any national power. He acknowledged that it was the strangest place for an “American of the Americans, with who knows how many Puritans and Patriots in his lineage” to find himself, kneeling in an empty church praying his “mea culpas” after 500 years of protest.

But, he reassured himself, the Adamses were Normans, so it was his Norman ancestors who had built the cathedrals and fought the crusades. Like T. S. Eliot in the quiet chapel at Little Gidding: “In my end is my beginning.”

America’s Pilgrim Inheritance — The Liberty Of The Church

Paradoxically, as the Pilgrims of 1620 fled the control of the king’s authority over the church, many a Catholic and Jew fled the control of the state over the church in the 1920s and 1930s. The Bolshevik regime confiscated church property, sold chalices and chasubles on the black market, and infiltrated seminaries. The Nazis purged schools and churches of teachers and ministers who objected to their national socialist agenda.

Yet the wake of these horrible circumstances saw a new immigration of artists, philosophers, scientists, political thinkers, poets, ministers, and teachers — Jacques and Raissa Maritain, Albert Einstein, Paul Tillich, Martin Buber, Czeslaw Milosz, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, Eva T. H. Brann, Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin. They came to American shores in the twentieth century seeking liberty to seek the truth; pilgrims who could never finally conform themselves to the Earthly City.Susan Hanssen is Associate Professor and Department Chair of History at the University of Dallas. She received her graduate degree in history from Rice University in Houston, Texas, and her undergraduate degree in history from Boston University. During the summer of 2008, she was an adjunct professor for the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation at Georgetown University and was the 2010-2011 Garwood Fellow at the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/24/how-americas-adams-family-inherited-and-preserved-the-pilgrim-mind/

Sidney Powell – Evidence of Election Fraud is Overwhelming

In this interview on Nov 16 with Lou Dobbs, Sidney Powell says the Smartmatic voting system used in the 2020 election was originally developed for Hugo Chavez so he could rig the vote. The company is owned and run by Communists. The President of Smartmatic, Pete Neffenger, is tied to Homeland Security and on Biden’s transition team. She says this has been happening all over the world for years and the CIA must have been complicit. She says people have been pointing at this issue for years and nothing was done.  How could Trump let this happen unless the whole thing is a shitshow? Is the whole drama a charade? 
Sidney Powell is the only honest broker in the election fraud scandal. Below, she says state officials were bribed to install Smartmatic machines. After she stated the CIA was complicit and Gina Haskell should be fired, the Trump campaign distanced itself from her. 

Watch this interview with Powell on November 20. 

Here is the transcript 

Maria Bartiromo:Sidney Powell, who’s part of President Trump’s legal team. Sidney before we went to the break, we talked about you said that there may have been kickbacks to some people who accepted the Dominion software. Tell me what you mean.
Sidney Powell:Well, I mean, we are collecting evidence now from various whistleblowers that are aware of substantial sums of money being given to family members of state officials who bought the software. We’re talking about a hundred million dollar packages for new voting machines suddenly in multiple states, and benefits ranging from financial benefits for family members to sort of what I would call election insurance, because they know that they can win the election if they are using that software. It’s really an insidious corrupt system. 
I can’t tell you how livid I am with our government for not paying attention to complaints, even brought by Democrats, Carolyn Maloney, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar over the last several years in written letters with expert reports, and some documentation of how corrupt the software is, and nobody in our government have paid any attention to it. This makes me wonder how much the CIA has used it for its own benefit in different places and why Gina Haskell is still there, and the CIA is beyond my comprehension. She should be fired immediately.
Maria Bartiromo:
Which governor or which government official accepted hundreds of millions of dollars in benefits for their family as they took on this software?
Sidney Powell:If I said hundreds of millions of dollars there, I misspoke. I don’t know the exact amount of money yet. We are still collecting the evidence on that, but it’s more than one.
Maria Bartiromo:Okay, so you can’t say who you believe took kickbacks. What is the CIA’s role? Why do you think Gina Haskell should be fired immediately? You’re saying that the CIA is behind the Dominion or Smartmatic voting software as well?
Sidney Powell:Well, the CIA and the FBI, and other government organizations have received multiple reports of wrongdoing and failures and vulnerabilities in this company’s product. Their own manual, if you sat down and read it, it would explain how and why no honest person would use this system. It’s not just dominion, there are other companies in the voting machine business in this country too, that may very well and are likely using the same software. We’ve detected voting irregularities that are in explicable and aligned with these problems in other states that think they have valid systems, but the people who bought the Dominion system for sure knew exactly what they were getting. It should never have been installed anywhere, and we are going to show the public exactly how rotten the entire state is.
Maria Bartiromo:
Now, I have spoken with a few whistleblowers myself this weekend, and one source who is an IT specialist told me that he knows the software and specifically advised people in Texas, officials in Texas not to use it, and yet he was overruled. He said that there was an unusual patch that was put into the software while it was live, and it’s highly unusual to put a patch in there. Is that what you’re referring to? Tell me how it’s done and how these back doors work.Sidney Powell:
Okay, that’s part of it. They can stick a thumb drive in the machine or load software to it. Even from the internet, they can do it from Germany or Venezuela even.They can remote access anything. They can watch votes in real-time. They can shift votes in real-time. We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they used and plan to use from the beginning to modify the votes in this case, to make sure Biden won. That’s why he said he didn’t need your votes now he would need you later. He was right, I mean, in his diminished state he had no filter, and he was speaking the truth more than once, including when he said he had the largest voter fraud organization ever. Well, it’s massive election fraud. It’s going to undo the entire election and they can do anything they want with the votes. They can have the machines not read the signature. They can have them, the machine’s not read the down-ballot. They can make the machines read and catalog only the Biden votes. It’s like drag and drop, whatever you want, wherever you want, upload votes. In fact, we’ve gotten math in Michigan and Pennsylvania. I think it is that all of a sudden hundreds of thousands of votes at a 67% ratio for Biden, 23% for Trump were uploaded multiple times into the system.
Maria Bartiromo:Sidney, you say you have an affidavit from someone who knows how this system works and was there with the planning of it. You believe you can prove this?
Sidney Powell:Yes, we have a sworn — essentially a sworn statement from a witness who knew exactly how it worked from the beginning. Why it was designed to work that way, and so when things started shutting down and they started stopped counting the votes here. That the same play that had worked in other countries.

————–RELATED
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/11/17/sidney-powell-outlines-affidavit-showing-purpose-of-smartmatic-voting-system-to-control-elections/comment-page-2/

https://www.trunews.com/stream/caged-kraken-hair-dye-rudy-slams-powell-after-she-linked-cia-to-dominion

https://www.henrymakow.com

5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms

Surely the journalist class should be intrigued by the historic implausibility of Joe Biden’s victory. That they are not is curious, to say the least.By J.B. Shurk

In all the excitement among objective journalists for Joe Biden’s declared victory, reporters are missing how extraordinary the Democrat’s performance was in the 2020 election. It’s not just that the former vice president is on track to become the oldest president in American history, it’s what he managed to accomplish at the polls this year.

Candidate Joe Biden was so effective at animating voters in 2020 that he received a record number of votes, more than 15 million more than Barack Obama received in his re-election of 2012. Amazingly, he managed to secure victory while also losing in almost every bellwether county across the country. No presidential candidate has been capable of such electoral jujitsu until now.

While Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton’s 2016 totals in every urban county in the United States, he outperformed her in the metropolitan areas of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Even more surprising, the former VP put up a record haul of votes, despite Democrats’ general failures in local House and state legislative seats across the nation.

He accomplished all this after receiving a record low share of the primary vote compared to his Republican opponent heading into the general election. Clearly, these are tremendous and unexpected achievements that would normally receive sophisticated analysis from the journalist class but have somehow gone mostly unmentioned during the celebrations at news studios in New York City and Washington, D.C.

The massive national political realignment now taking place may be one source of these surprising upsets. Yet still, to have pulled so many rabbits out of his hat like this, nobody can deny that Biden is a first-rate campaigner and politician, the likes of which America has never before seen. Let’s break down just how unique his political voodoo has been in 2020.

1. 80 Million Votes

Holy moly! A lot of Americans turned out for a Washington politician who’s been in office for nearly 50 years. Consider this: no incumbent president in nearly a century and a half has gained votes in a re-election campaign and still lost.

President Trump gained more than ten million votes since his 2016 victory, but Biden’s appeal was so substantial that it overcame President Trump’s record support among minority voters. Biden also shattered Barack Obama’s own popular vote totals, really calling into question whether it was not perhaps Biden who pulled Obama across the finish lines in 2008 and 2012.

Proving how sharp his political instincts are, the former VP managed to gather a record number of votes while consistently trailing President Trump in measures of voter enthusiasm. Biden was so savvy that he motivated voters unenthusiastic about his campaign to vote for him in record numbers.

2. Winning Despite Losing Most Bellwether Counties

Biden is set to become the first presidentin 60 years to lose the states of Ohio and Florida on his way to election. For a century, these states have consistently predicted the national outcome, and they have been considered roughly representative of the American melting pot as a whole. Despite national polling giving Biden a lead in both states, he lost Ohio by eight points and Florida by more than three.

For Biden to lose these key bellwethers by notable margins and still win the national election is newsworthy. Not since the Mafia allegedly aided John F. Kennedy in winning Illinois over Richard Nixon in 1960 has an American president pulled off this neat trick.

Even more unbelievably, Biden is on his way to winning the White House after having lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country. The Wall Street Journal and The Epoch Timesindependently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have nearly perfect presidential voting records over the last 40 years. President Trump won every single bellwether county, except Clallam County in Washington.

Whereas the former VP picked up Clallam by about three points, President Trump’s margin of victory in the other 18 counties averaged over 16 points. In a larger list of 58 bellwether counties that have correctly picked the president since 2000, Trump won 51 of them by an average of 15 points, while the other seven went to Biden by around four points. Bellwether countiesoverwhelmingly chose President Trump, but Biden found a path to victory anyway.

3. Biden Trailed Clinton Except in a Select Few Cities

Patrick Basham, a pollster with an accurate track record and the director of the Democracy Institute in D.C., highlighted two observations made by fellow colleagues, polling guru Richard Baris of Big Data Poll and Washington Post election analyst Robert Barnes. Baris noted a statistical oddity from 2020’s election returns: “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”

Barnes added that in those “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.” In the states that mattered most, so many mail-in ballots poured in for Biden from the cities that he put up record-breaking numbers and overturned state totals that looked like comfortable leads for President Trump.

If Democrats succeed in eliminating the Electoral College, Biden’s magic formula for churning out overwhelming vote totals in a handful of cities should make the Democrats unbeatable.

4. Biden Won Despite Democrat Losses Everywhere Else

Randy DeSoto noted in The Western Journal that “Donald Trump was pretty much the only incumbent president in U.S. history to lose his re-election while his own party gained seats in the House of Representatives.” Now that’s a Biden miracle!

In 2020, The Cook Political Report and The New York Times rated 27 House seats as toss-ups going into Election Day. Right now, Republicans appear to have won all 27. Democrats failed to flip a single state house chamber, while Republicans flipped both the House and Senate in New Hampshire and expanded their dominance of state legislatures across the country.

Christina Polizzi, a spokesperson for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, went so far as to state: “It’s clear that Trump isn’t an anchor for the Republican legislative candidates. He’s a buoy.” Amazingly, Biden beat the guy who lifted all other Republicans to victory. Now that’s historic!

5. Biden Overcame Trump’s Commanding Primary Vote

In the past, primary vote totals have been remarkably accurate in predicting general election winners. Political analyst David Chapman highlighted three historical facts before the election.

First, no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election. Second, President Trump received 94 percent of the primary vote, which is the fourth highest of all time (higher than Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Clinton, or Obama). In fact, Trump is only one of five incumbents since 1912 to receive more than 90 percent of the primary vote.

Third, Trump set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent when more than 18 million people turned out for him in 2020 (the previous record, held by Bill Clinton, was half that number). For Biden to prevail in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the primaries, turns a century’s worth of prior election data on its head.

Joe Biden achieved the impossible. It’s interesting that many more journalists aren’t pointing that out.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/5-more-ways-joe-biden-magically-outperformed-election-norms/