As per a ruling by the Lisbon court, only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ died of COVID, numbering 152, and not 17,000 as claimed by the government. The ruling has proved that the government faked COVID-19 death statistics.
Following a citizen’s petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified COVID-19 mortality data.
According to the ruling (read full judgment below), the number of verified COVID-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not about 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.
All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.
The data are from the Sistema de Informação dos Certificados de Óbito (Death Certificate Information System – SICO), the only such system in Portugal.
The reference to 152 death certificated issued ‘under Justice Ministry supervision’ is spurious, as all death certificates are issued under Justice Ministry auspices, being the only institution that issues them.
The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:
“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”
Eating and breathing are the fundamental requirements of life. But the energy for life also requires combustion: the food we eat must combine with the oxygen we breathe. This combustion takes place inside our cells in tiny structures called mitochondria. And within our mitochondria are even tinier structures called electron transport chains. These are the invisible wires that carry the electrons generated by the digestion of our food to the molecules of oxygen supplied by our lungs and blood. Anything that interferes with these tiny electric currents interferes with life.
Wireless technology, by bombarding our cells with complex, pulsed, modulated electromagnetic fields, plays havoc with these currents of life. The whole process of eating, breathing, digesting, and producing energy — the process of living — slows down. We are seeing the consequences everywhere.
Diabetes, Heart Disease and Cancer
When the electron-generating enzymes in our mitochondria cannot keep up with the volume of sugars, fats and proteins being supplied by our digestive system, those components of our diet accumulate in our blood.
The accumulation of sugar in the blood, and its excretion by the kidneys, is called diabetes, a disease that was so rare before 1860 that most doctors never saw a case during their lifetime. Eating sugar, no matter how much, once did not cause diabetes.
The accumulation of fats in the blood, and their deposition in the walls of our arteries, including our coronary arteries, causes heart disease, which was uncommon in 1850 and almost never occurred except in infants and the elderly. Cholesterol, and high-fat diets, once did not cause heart disease. Later, the same changes occurred in zoo animals. Heart disease, for example, did not exist in any animals in the Philadelphia Zoo before 1945. And the first heart attacks ever recorded in zoo animals occurred in 1955. Yet sclerosis of the coronary arteries increased so rapidly that by 1963, over 90 percent of all mammals and 72 percent of all birds that died in the zoo had coronary disease, while 24 percent of the mammals and 10 percent of the birds had had heart attacks. Similar trends were reported from the London Zoo and the Zoo of Antwerp.
When our cells are starved of oxygen because they cannot use all the oxygen we breathe, sometimes they revert to anaerobic (non-oxygen using) metabolism and become cancerous. Cancer, too, was once quite rare. In 1850 it was the 25th most common cause of death in the U.S., behind accidental drowning. Even tobacco smoking, before about 1920, did not cause lung cancer. And during the 1930s and 1940s the rates of both malignant and benign tumors increased dramatically among many families of mammals and birds at the Philadelphia Zoo.
The modern pandemic of obesity is also an electrical disease caused not by overeating and lack of exercise but by the same slowing down of metabolism. Depending on our genetic disposition, our bodies either excrete a large portion of our digested food unused, causing weight loss, or else convert much of the carbohydrates and fats we eat into fatty tissues, causing obesity. Obesity has been steadily increasing, worldwide, not only in humans, but in zoo animals, laboratory animals, pets, farm animals, and wild animals, due to the increase in radiation.
Contrary to popular belief, the lengthening of the human life span is not due to modern medicine. It is instead caused by the interference with metabolism that slows down our rate of living. And also contrary to popular belief, this is not a good thing: we are all living slower, sicker, less vital lives. This was observed in 1880 by Dr. George Miller Beard in his book on neurasthenia: “Although [neurasthenia] may tend to prolong life and to protect the system against febrile and inflammatory disease, yet the amount of suffering that [it] cause[s] is enormous.” And the same observation was made by Yasuo Kagawa in 1978 about the remarkable increase in lifespan in Japan: “Extended life expectancy but increased diseases.”
This, too, has been occurring in both humans and animals.
The evidence for what I have summarized so far is set out in detail in chapters of my book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life: Chapter 11, “Irritable Heart”; Chapter 12, “The Transformation of Diabetes”; Chapter 13, “Cancer and the Starvation of Life”; and Chapter 14, “Suspended Animation.”
The rest of this newsletter is devoted to additional evidence that has been brought to my attention only recently.
Normal Body Temperature is Decreasing
Dousing the fires of life by interfering with metabolism might be expected to lower the body’s temperature. And it is so.
Two weeks ago, Dr. Mark Thompson, a biochemist in the UK, called my attention to a paper published by a group of doctors at the Stanford University School of Medicine. They pointed out that normal body temperature is no longer 37° Celsius (98.6° Fahrenheit), but that it in fact has been steadily declining for close to 150 years. Their paper, published January 7, 2020, is titled “Decreasing human body temperature in the United States since the Industrial Revolution.” The data they relied on were hundreds of thousands of temperature measurements taken from three databases: the Union Army Veterans of the Civil War (measurement years 1862-1930); the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I (NHANES) (1971-1975); and the Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment (STRIDE) (2007-2017).
Because these scientists could not figure out what could make body temperature drop so steadily, they attributed it to “physiologic evolution” instead of to an environmental factor. Another study, this time of the Tsimane’ people in the Bolivian Amazon, came to my attention a few days ago. It is titled “Rapidly declining body temperature in a tropical human population.” Most Tsimane’ villages still have no electricity, but in 2004, many of the villagers acquired cell phones, radios, antennas, light bulbs, and solar panels, and in 2009 a 374-kilometer, 115-kilovolt transmission line was completed through the area. The line runs close to about a 50-kilometer stretch of the Maniqui River, where many of the villages are located. Today there is cell phone service for at least 25 kilometers, and probably farther, in every direction from the only town, San Borja. 16,800 measurements of body temperature were made between 2003 and 2018. During this period of time, normal body temperature plummeted among these people from 37.4° C (99.3° F) to 36.4° C (97.5° F).
I have charted all the data from both these papers on the same graph:
One detail that the Stanford scientists ignored is the sharp drop in body temperature that occurred in the U.S. when it entered World War I in 1917 and that continued through most of the 1920s. This is consistent with the deployment of immensely powerful low frequency radio stations by the United States in order to reach Navy ships overseas during the war, most of which were dismantled or replaced by lower power shortwave stations by the end of the 1920s.
The role of electricity and radio in causing influenza, including the Spanish influenza of 1918, is also explored in my book: Chapter 7, “Acute Electrical Illness”; Chapter 8, “Mystery on the Isle of Wight”; and Chapter 9, “Earth’s Electric Envelope.”
Cancer is Not a Genetic Disease
Additional evidence that cancer is a metabolic mitochondrial disease has also come to my attention recently. Although modern oncologists are wedded to the idea that cancer is caused by genetic mutations caused by environmental toxins, a rival theory, formulated a century ago by Otto Warburg, holds that cancer is a metabolic disease caused by lack of oxygen, and that carcinogens cause cancer by damaging cellular respiration.
Warburg based his hypothesis on the observation that cancer cells do not require oxygen, and this observation is behind the modern method of diagnosing and staging cancer using positron emission tomography, or PET scanning. Because anaerobic metabolism is inefficient and consumes glucose at a tremendous rate, PET scans can easily find tumors in the body by their more rapid uptake of radioactive glucose.
Now, new research by Thomas Seyfried at Boston College has virtually proven that cancer is not caused by genetic mutations. He reviewed evidence from nuclear transfer experiments done in his own and other laboratories in recent years that prove that it is the mitochondria-containing cytoplasm, and not the DNA-containing nucleus, that determines whether a cell is cancerous or not.
When the nucleus of a cancer cell is combined with the cytoplasm of a normal cell, the resulting fused cell grows normally when implanted into an animal. Conversely, when the nucleus of a normal cell is combined with the cytoplasm of a cancer cell, the fused cell forms a tumor when implanted. It is the mitochondria, and not the DNA, that determines whether a cell is cancerous or not.
“In contrast to the somatic mutation theory,” writes Seyfried, “emerging evidence suggests that cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, according to the original theory of Otto Warburg.” Cancer, he says, is caused by lack of oxygen, and DNA mutations are a secondary effect of that lack. “It has been my view,” he writes, “that the plethora of random somatic mutations seen in tumors of almost every kind arise ultimately as downstream effects of insufficient respiration with compensatory fermentation.”
The prevailing, mistaken view of cancer is responsible for the artificial, wrong, and devastating distinction made by scientists, governments, and the World Health Organization between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is energetic enough to knock electrons off of atoms and create ions, and anything that can ionize your DNA is supposed to be able to cause genetic mutations which is supposed to be the cause of cancer. Therefore, according to the prevailing theory, wavelengths much shorter than light waves (high-energy ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays) are dangerous and wavelengths longer than light waves (infrared, radio waves, and power line radiation) are safe, and can be pulsed, modulated and manipulated, and sent all over the planet with impunity.
Seyfried and his colleagues have virtually proven that this is wrong.
Matthew West made a song titled “Modest is Hottest.” He created and sang it for his daughters. “The jokey, satiric song urged his young daughters to choose ensembles that are a ‘little more Amish, a little less Kardashian’ because ‘modest is hottest, then latest fashion trend.’ Elsewhere in the video, West said, ‘If I catch you doing dances on the TikTok in a crop top, so help me God you’ll be grounded till the world stops.’”
Matthew West then took the song down and issued an apology after being accused of “promoting purity culture” as if this is a terribly thing! “Faithwire points out musician Audrey Assad’s criticism as being perhaps the most prominent of all. Assad addressed West’s satire on her own Instagram page, arguing that the message sends a poor example to young men and women and is demeaning to both genders. ‘Modest is hottest’ still entirely centers men and their preferences in the way a woman should dress — sets up being ‘hot’ as the ultimate goal for women — and positions all men as creeps who can’t handle seeing a woman’s skin without becoming out of control monsters,’ Assad wrote. ‘It’s demeaning to men AND women. I really hate this phrase and yet it is the one cockroach that survives literally everything.’”
Jeremy Coleman, a pastor, added this to the issue: “‘Women are far too often shamed and blamed for the abhorrent behavior of men. So the idea of ‘Modest Is Hottest’ is saying that, because men can’t control their lustful desires, you have to change who you are. Telling your daughters to dress a certain way to curb their beauty is telling them they are being sexual when in fact they are just being who they are.”
Can I just scream, “WHERE IS WISDOM THESE DAYS???” Oh, I know. Lindsay Harold, a young Christian woman who is pregnant with her fifth baby and was homeschooled, has a LOT of wisdom. Here are her words on the topic:
“The sin of lust and the sin of immodesty are often the male and female sides of the same coin. Men are more likely to sin by looking lustfully, because it is looking that is the greater desire for them. Women are more likely to sin by immodesty, because the greater desire of women is to be looked at with desire. We all have natural desires, and those desires are not necessarily sinful.
“Women are designed to wish to be looked at and desired by a man. Men are designed to want to look at the female form. But it’s not right to fulfill this desire outside marriage – whether to look or be looked at. Either one is a twisting of natural desire into sin.”
Women these days don’t want any responsibility for how they act or dress, and everyone is simply fawning over them by complying with their wishes. It’s disgusting. Please, Matthew West, please put your song back up. It was great.
In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array. 1 Timothy 2:9
“Despite consistent evidence that schools were not sites of high transmission for COVID-19, many teachers failed to put aside baseless fears about classroom superspreading and rampant infection. As a result, many of the most vulnerable children in our society suffered outrageous hardships, while their affluent peers attended private schools in person. We’ve all been told that school closures and lockdowns were mandated by science, but what if these mandates were immoral? What if they were based on a series of lies? In fact, what if the entire rationale for most restrictions was actually rotten to the core?” Gutentag’s title “War on Reality” is appropriate because in the broadest sense, this is what the covid psyop is all about. People who question the logic need to realize that the hurt and destruction are DELIBERATE. Then it all makes sense.Gutentag is Jewish; this appears on a Jewish web site. Although the satanist Masonic Jewish central banking cartel is behind the commie virus, many Jews do not understand its true nature and are not part of the scam while many non-Jewish Freemasons are.
Alex Gutentag is a public school teacher and writer in California.
On March 13, 2020, the public school district where I teach announced that all classrooms and buildings would be closed for two weeks. Then two weeks turned into two months, and two months turned into over a full year without in-person instruction. My school serves a diverse population of low-income students in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is impossible to overstate the severity of this disruption caused by school closures for these students, many of whom did not have a computer or internet at home when virtual learning began. Online, my students got only a fraction of the regular curriculum. Kids who had once loved the social aspects of school were left with only the parts of school they hated, and students with disabilities who depended on school for daily living needs were cut off from a vital service. “Public health” and “the safety of our children” came to mean students Zooming from homeless encampments, experiencing severe abuse, regressing academically, falling into depression, going hungry, struggling through catastrophic learning loss, and, in the saddest cases, not making it through the year alive. … (Quote above was here.) OFFICIAL NARRATIVE REEKS OF PSY OP We’re watching the mainstream pandemic narrative starting to unravel. … A trove of media darling Dr. Anthony Fauci’s emails was recently released to the public. The emails reveal early assertions that asymptomatic transmission is rare, that post-infection immunity is highly likely, and that masks are “not really effective.” However, you wouldn’t know that from the public messaging since the start of the pandemic, in which bureaucrats and journalists upheld lasting misconceptions that asymptomatic cases are dangerous, natural immunity is not a factor in protecting the population, and individuals are responsible for viral spread. These misconceptions fuelled countless months of lockdowns, business closures, and job losses, pushing millions of people into poverty and despair through the destructive lie that stringent “sick until proven healthy” interventions save lives. In reality, the rushed doomsday forecasts and commitment to politically correct pseudoscience prompted leaders to abandon decades of pandemic planning. This not only had disastrous economic consequences, but it also exacerbated the effects of COVID-19 itself. And rather than swiftly correct their errors, public health officials and politicians doubled down, manipulated data, and blamed ordinary people for the failure of nonsensical policies. The uncomfortable truth is that “The Science” did not protect vulnerable populations. Instead, “expert” advice served only to make the pandemic more deadly and replace the scientific process with destructive anti-science. SCIENTIFIC INVERSION Our current state of scientific inversion has sown intense division in the U.S. and threatens to rip apart the social fabric. For the past 16 months, the public has been told that it is our duty to serve the needs of medical institutions and personnel, not the other way around. Effective low-cost therapeutics like ivermectin were dismissed in favor of a vaccine program that transferred billions of dollars from taxpayers to pharmaceutical executives and shareholders. Critics of measures like school closures were accused of far-right white supremacy, even though these measures were most damaging to working-class people and minorities. Deadly policies were portrayed as lifesaving, and public health protocols caused immense clinical damage. A few people have benefited from this war on reality while many have paid a heavy price. In 2020, workers lost $3.7 trillion, while billionaires gained $3.9 trillion and 493 new individuals became billionaires. During this same period, decades of progress against diseases like malaria and tuberculosis were reversed. Disruptions to health and nutrition services killed 228,000 children in South Asia. Globally, the impact of lockdowns on health programs, food production, and supply chains plunged millions of people into severe hunger and malnutrition. In the U.S., we are facing a crisis of cardiovascular disease and undiagnosed cancer. Unemployment shock will cause 890,000 additional deaths over the next 15 years. Overdoses from synthetic opioids increased by 38.4%, and 11% of U.S. adults considered suicide last June. Three million children disappeared from public school systems, and ERs saw a 31% increase in adolescent mental health visits. Now, the stories that were used to justify these hardships are continuing to unravel. Many of the people responsible will insist that the second-order consequences are the horrible symptoms of a magic virus and that the mistakes made in handling such a crisis were inevitable. But preventing young children from reaching crucial developmental milestones in the face of mounting evidence is not just a “mistake.” Forcing hospital patients to die alone without saying goodbye to their families is not just a “mistake.” Pushing millions of people into poverty and starvation is not just a “mistake.” These are crimes. Basic civil, human, and economic rights were violated under demonstrably fraudulent pretences. The sacrifices we thought we were making for the common good were sacrifices made in vain. Unlawful lockdowns demoralized the population and ruined lives. The tragic reality is that this was all for nothing. The only way to prevent these events from recurring is to exhaustively investigate not just the origin of the virus, but every corrupt and misguided decision made by politicians, NGOs, public health organizations, and scientific institutions made since its fateful emergence.
(Left, Pierre Elliot Trudeau with Justin’s father)
Monday we explained Canada’s gratuitous lockdown by showing that Justine’s father was actually Fidel Castro.His cuckold “father” Pierre Elliot Trudeau (1919-2000) was Canadian Prime Minister from 1968-1979 and 1980-1984. His file was destroyed because he was a Communist (Illuminati) agent. Most “leaders” are Freemasons. The goal of Freemasonry is Rothschild (Cabalist Jewish, i.e. Satanic) world tyranny, i.e. Communism or “globalism.” Communism is monopoly (i.e. banker controlled) capitalism. Trudeau took the first steps toward normalizing homosexuality and making European Canadians a minority, i.e. “multiculturalism.” Castro’s son is following in Trudeau’s footsteps.
Steve Hewitt, a senior lecturer at the University of Birmingham slammed CSIS for sending the prime minister’s file “down an Orwellian memory hole”. He called the purging of the file “a crime against Canadian history” and said that such actions are “expected of an authoritarian state and not a proper democracy”. 24/6/2019by Henry Makow PhD
A file on former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, compiled by the country’s then spy agency, Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Security Service, was destroyed back in 1989 and thus has not ended up in the national archives as it was supposed to be.
The file would have become available to the public in September next year on the 20th anniversary of his death. CSIS, (Canadian Security & Intelligence Service) claimed the files for Trudeau, and former Prime Ministers Lester Pearson and John Diefenbaker were destroyed in the interests of “privacy” and because the RCMP had been “too zealous” in the cold war environment. All three Prime Ministers were Freemasons. All intelligence agencies work for the Rothschilds, not the national governments who fund them.
In 1968, on the eve of Pierre Elliot Trudeau’s ascent to the Liberal leadership and Prime Minister, Igor Gouzenko (1919-1982) released a dossier arguing that PET was a dangerous Communist.
Igor Sergeyevich Gouzenko was a cypher clerk for the Soviet embassy to Canada in Ottawa, Ontario. He defected on 5 September 1945, three days after the end of World War II, with 109 documents detailing the USSR′s espionage activities in the West. This proved a great embarrassment since the leaders of the West were all secret Communists (Freemasons). The man who mentored PET into power, Canadian Prime Minister Lester Pearson had been exposed by KGB defector Elizabeth Bentley as a Russian asset.
The globalist traitors decided to take a lemon and make lemonade. They used Gouzenko’s revelations to kick start the bogus “Cold War.”
Living in hiding, Gouzenko warnedthat Trudeau would become another Castro and turn Canada into another Cuba. He reminded Canadians that despite being Justice Minister, PET had been barred from the US as a Communist. He said PET’s ideas were borrowed from Mao and Lenin. His academic writings were all pro-Communist. He threatened to withhold nickel from the US because of the Vietnam War.
PET had behaved in suspicious ways as a young man. He attended conferences at the Kremlin, traveled to Vietnam during the Vietnam war and was actually apprehended by the US Coast Guard trying to row a boat to Cuba before the Bay of Pigs.
Gouzenko also focused on PET’s mentor, Prime Minister Lester Pearson. Pearson wouldn’t let the FBI interview Gouzenko. He appointed the homosexual Robert Bryce Deputy Minister of Finance. In this position, Bryce scrapped the CBC’s International service that was beamed to the USSR. Bryce had been part of a Communist study group in Washington DC.
JUSTINE TRUDEAU CASTRO
The Illuminati are sexual deviants. They abuse their own children as part of the brainwashing process. There is a suggestion that this happened to Justine.
In her book, TRANCE-FORMATION OF AMERICA (1995) MK-ULTRA survivor Cathy O’Brien stated that many world leaders, including Pierre Trudeau and Brian Mulroney, are pedophiles. She met them in the course of her life as a sex slave trained (with her young daughter) to service high-profile politicians. Other sources support Cathy O’Brien’s allegations.
In a suicide note, Castro’s son Fidelito said Justine was his half-brother, and complained that Fidel compared him unfavorably. Fidelito had a half-dozen other half-brothers and sisters.
If it looks like a duck, and walks and talks like a duck, it’s a duck.
Mankind is held captive by a satanic cult, the Illuminati, based on Cabalist Judaism. Their aim is to enslave and exploit society by corrupting and degrading it. This is the logic behind endless wars, growing wealth disparity, gratuitous migration and mainstreaming gender and sexual dysphoria. Their main instruments are Freemasonry and Organized Judaism. They control all major social institutions, especially government, media, education, the legal system, corporations, religion.
The mainspring of their power is the central banking system. “Money” is a mental concept that only becomes real when translated into a product or service. They create it out of nothing asa debt to themselves with the backing of their shills in government. I suspect that we, our families and property are collateral.
There are billions of transactions every day. All that changes is the digits on a ledger. They keep this ledger and are capable of erasing it at any time.
Money is the bloodstream of society. Little to nothing happens without it. Think of central banking as the heart (a pump.) The Rothschilds are Cabalists. They wish to leverage this credit monopoly to include every aspect of the body politic,includingthe mind, spirit and gender identity.This is Communism. This is the NWO. This is Satanic Possession.
— Ann Diamond – PET was also a Pedophile – Justine a Victim of MK Ultra Brainwashing? First Comment from Gordon: here’s a something you will appreciate it’s in comments below a review of Elizabeth Bentley’s book Out of Bondage at URL https://foseti.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/review-of-out-of-bondage-by-elizabeth-bentley/ Thomas Fink says:March 7, 2012 at 4:53 amI can never get enough of trying to understand what drew these people to communism. What were her views during the Nazi-Soviet Pact? I was a communist in the seventies. In Germany. But I don´t think that matters. To be a Communist was everywhere the same. The seventies were the last times when you could imagine that something like the working class exists. And that it has a historic mission. And that you as a communist belong to the vanguard of this mission. And when you still could meet fighters of the old struggles in flesh, plan together with them the final defeat of the bourgeoisie. This had a special taste. It was in an odd way religious. What a great and omnipotent feeling to belong to the vanguard. Always you had to check the newest directives from the Central Committee or the Polit Bureau. The enemies of today could become the comrades of tomorrow. Shaping reality by ignoring reality through mind-bending is a secret pleasure, which conservatives who struggle so hard to get some sense out of reality cannot understand. Even a long time after I quit I liked to read the many party papers of all the fractions especially about the in fights. In hindsight I call it the Talmudic mindset. And this mindset has indeed certain addictive features.
(David Dees was a visionary. Although he died just over a year ago, he could clearly see what was coming.) “These are no ordinary times.What was inconceivable pre-2020 is today’s reality. What’s going on should terrify everyone paying attention.The scourge of toxic covid mass-jabbing for social control and depopulation on an unparalleled scale exceeds the worst of what Orwell and Huxley could have imagined.”
The nation I grew up in long ago hasn’t existed throughout much of my adult lifetime. Notably post-9/11 and especially since early last year — after seasonal flu was deceptively renamed covid with diabolical aims in mind — US/Western war on humanity went far beyond where their earlier regimes hadn’t dare go before. Not only are US and other Western nations unsafe and unfit to live in, their ruling regimes represent an unprecedented threat to their people and humanity overall. Are US-led Western regimes on the cusp of mandating toxic covid jabs designed to destroy health, shorten lifespans, and kill maximum numbers of people worldwide? US federal law prohibits mandated use of vaccines and other drugs unapproved by the Pharma-controlled FDA. US/Western emergency use authorization never should have been OK’d for unsafe, experimental, fast-tracked, inadequately tested, toxic covid mRNA drugs and vaccines — notably when no emergency exists.
In defiance of federal law and protecting what’s too precious to lose, hundreds of US colleges and universities now mandate toxic covid jabs for students and staff. Unthinkable not long ago, US higher education today risks harm to health and well-being of everyone on growing numbers of college campuses. On May 28, a US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) press release said the following: “Federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be” jabbed for covid. In defiance of federal law as explained above, the EEOC supports toxic mass-jabbing as long as not in violation of “ADA (provisions) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other EEO considerations.” EEOC guidance breached federal law — the Nuremberg Code as well that requires voluntary consent on all things related to health. Growing numbers of employers require staff to be covid-jabbed. The same goes for increasing numbers of hospitals and municipalities. On June 23, San Francisco became the largest US municipality to mandate covid jabs for city workers. Refusniks risk termination. The city’s human resources department said the following: City workers are required to report “their vaccination status…no later than July 29.” If covid-jabbed, they must provide documented proof. They must be jabbed “no later than 10 weeks after” FDA approval of at least one covid drug — what most likely is coming, perhaps before summer’s end or early fall. Emergency use authorization alone exists today — despite hazards to health when covid jabs are taken as directed. Growing numbers of US municipalities most likley will follow SF’s bad example. Will growing numbers of business establishments, commercial spaces, other public venues, and perhaps residential buildings follow suit? Will refusniks be ostracized from US and other Western societies for good health practices to stay safe? According to Newsweek, so-called US “health experts” urged the Biden regime “to promote (covid mass-jabbing) orders and passports — on the phoney pretext of protecting public health toxic covid drugs destroy. In California, virtual covid police are reportedly looking for and pressuring covid mass-jabbing refusniks to self-inflict harm. Last week in Atlanta, unelected Kamala Harris called for “volunteers” to knock on doors and harass refusniks to get jabbed. She, Biden, their families, other senior regime officials and their family won’t touch toxic covid jabs they’re pushing ordinary Americans to take. The same goes for at least most privileged individuals in the US and West — knowing toxic covid jabs risk irreversible harm or death near-or-longer-term if jabbed.——————————-VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at firstname.lastname@example.org. Stephen Lendman —“Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity”
God commands that we FLEE fornication, because it is a sin against one’s own body (1 Corinthians 6:18). It’s vitally important to teach your daughters to remain sexually pure until marriage. I have written about this before. Today, I am going to teach you how to teach your sons to flee from harlots. There are many these days. Feminism has turned women into harlots.
First, you must help them to hide God’s Word in their hearts, so that they will not sin against Him (Psalm 119:11). Then, read and study the first seven chapters of Proverbs with them. I am going to zero in on chapter seven.
“And, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart. She is loud and stubborn; her feet abide not in her house: Now is she without, now in the streets, and lieth in wait at every corner” (Proverbs 7:10-12). Teach your sons to beware of those women who dress like harlots. They love to show off their bodies. They wear tight and revealing clothing in order to entice men. Encourage them to find a woman who is modest and is only willing to show her body to her husband.
Harlots are those who are subtil of heart. Their goal is to manipulate and deceive unsuspecting men. They are sly, cunning, and crafty like Satan was with Eve. Their intent is to cause destruction in men’s lives. Sex doesn’t only ruin women’s lives. It ruins men’s lives too.
She is loud. She is the opposite of having a meek and quiet spirit. She demands her rights. She wants what she wants when she wants it regardless of the consequences. She’s selfish and makes her foolish desires known unto all.
She is stubborn. She refuses to listen to truth. She is always learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth (2 Timothy 3:7). She loves to have her ears tickled. She mocks and ridicules those who teach and love Truth. She is a hater and despiser of God and everything good.
She never wants to be home where she belongs. She’s out and about. She goes to the bars, gets drunk, and fornicates with men freely. She has a career and entices men in her workplace. She is flirty and acts innocent but on the inside, she is dark and wicked.
“With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him” (Proverbs 7:21) With her lies, deceit, and flirtatious mannerism, she tricks men into fornicating with her. She falsely believes that this is empowering to her, but it only causes destruction. She doesn’t mind destroying marriages and families. Life is all about her and her pleasures. Her heart is hardened, and she is continually led by the father of lies, Satan, to do his will which is to kill, steal, and destroy.
“Her house is the way to hell, going down to the chambers of death” (Proverbs 31:27). Yes, she will take them right down to the pit of hell with her.
If your sons are taught these things while growing up, they will grow up to be men of wisdom and flee this destruction. Tell them that porn does the same thing. All of the women in porn are harlots waiting to entice and destroy men. Satan’s goal is to destroy men and masculinity; for if he can do this, he can destroy nations as we are witnessing today.
Then, teach your sons Proverbs 31 and the kind of woman they should be saving themselves for and seeking. It will be worth it! God’s ways are perfect. Drill this into their hearts and minds from the time they are young. Just as you set rules and boundaries for your children, God has set them for us too.
I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. Romans 12:1,2
Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed — not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed. Noel Ignatiev in his journal Race Traitor
The open pursuance of ‘Whiteness Studies’ must be perceived as nothing less than an act of extreme, even violent, aggression against the White race. Andrew Joyce on Whiteness Studies
To be effective, social engineering cannot be perceived. Michael Jones in Logos Rising
Earlier this year, my brother suddenly asked me what “Critical Race Theory” was. I was elated, for this was proof that this pernicious, genocidal, anti-White theory was finally entering into the consciousness of Whites. Since my brother asked me, stories about Critical Race Theory (CRT) have mushroomed, including much criticism of this previously arcane intellectual trend.
Much to my amazement, however, I’ve noticed that few if any critics of CRT have associated the theory with Jewish ethnic activism.
Though the theory has long been employed in university settings, more recently it has turned up in government and corporate offices, and even the military has been pushing it since the inauguration of Joe Biden as President. For me, it’s long been a given that CRT is linked to the social engineering of our “hostile elite,” which in the context of The Occidental Observer means powerful Jews and Jewish organizations who rule over America and much of The West. When viewed more broadly, however, the topic of CRT has in fact been much addressed by our writers but often under a consideration of something called “Whiteness Studies.” In that sense, I’m merely adding the term “Critical Race Theory” to an ongoing conversation about Jewish ethnic war on Whites.
For me, CRT fits squarely into the mold of Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” category in which Jewish “gurus” concoct a Talmudic verbal assault whose main goal is the further destruction of Gentiles — literally. I know because I had a ringside seat to the introduction of CRT in the graduate schools of the 1990s, with one of the most vicious practitioners of the “art” as one of my required professors. It was a brutal experience, but at least I was forced to reckon with it from then on and have since probed more and more deeply into its Jewish roots. In that sense, I’ve gained from the trauma I experienced and emerged out the other end able to share with my audience the lessons I’ve learned.
To tell this story, let’s begin with a now obscure Australian writer named Robert Hughes (1938 – 2012), who was once described as “the most famous art critic in the world.” In 1993, he’d gotten so fed up with identity politics that he penned the book Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America (Oxford University Press). In this book, he rightly skewered the growth of the Grievance Industry, giving example after example of how black groups or women’s groups or whatever loudly attacked the White Majority for all manner of sins. I recall how his book attracted attention from many of the print journals of the time, with many taking the Australian author’s side, so bad had this “culture of complaint” become.
What frustrated me, however, was the fact that Hughes completely neglected to address the “meta-complaint” in the West from which all lesser complaints emerged. To wit, Hughes failed to see how The Holocaust Narrative had been so successful in advancing Jewish interests that naturally other groups eagerly imitated this successful model.
Of course in 1993 the Complaint Industry was just hitting its stride and I soon endured the “graduate education” described above, with mere complaint being elevated to something far more pernicious and menacing. In any case, the direction of complaint was always the same: Against the White race.
I eventually staggered out of higher education, badly bruised and emotionally scarred, but with terminal degree in hand. Sturdier souls might have crowed that “Whatever doesn’t kill me only makes me stronger,” but I’ve been too battered since to engage in such braggadocio. Instead I try to keep my head down and stoically soldier on. Jews are playing for keeps in this battle.
Fast forward a few years when I was diligently working on a major composition about Jewish power in America and a professor of history with a Harvard Ph.D. twice encouraged me to “give the work of Kevin MacDonald a fair hearing.” I did and the experience has been life changing. His trilogy, culminating in The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, appeared to me at just the right time; I was ready to truly hear what the master had to say.
Of course I immediately recognized the similarity of main titles between Hughes’ “Culture of Complaint” and MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique,” but fortunately the latter’s laser-like focus on Jews made MacDonald’s book far more important than Hughes’. Verily, if Whites ever come out of the ethnic battle described by MacDonald, The Culture of Critique will be among the top books in the new Western pantheon. Future generations of Whites will know the name “Kevin MacDonald” as household words, as well they should.
Here, I am assuming our audience knows the gist of Culture of Critique, as well as the later Cultural Insurrections, so I’m going to now jump to the founding of MacDonald’s Occidental Observer, the online blog which emerged from The Occidental Quarterly, our side’s academic journal. Early on, in 2008, MacDonald published a blog called “Promoting genocide of Whites? Noel Ignatiev and the Culture of Western Suicide” in which he parsed the wordplay used by the late Jewish professor from Harvard to reveal its genocidal intentions toward Whites. Ignatiev was the founder of the journal Race Traitor, the motto of which is “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity,” a phrase which immediate recalls Jewess Susan Sontag’s infamous lines “The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, Balanchine ballets, et al., don’t redeem what this particular civilisation has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history …”
Situating Ignatiev’s clever use of words in the category of Jewish ideologies deconstructed in Culture of Critique, MacDonald wrote,
Our interpretation is that Ignatiev’s views are nothing more than ethnic competition. As a leftist Jew, he is part of a long tradition that has opposed white interests and identity — the culture of critiquethat has become the culture of Western suicide. And like so many strongly identified Jews, his hatred for the people and culture of the West comes shining through.
Further falling back on categories included in Culture of Critique, MacDonald concluded that
Ignatiev is just another Jewish intellectual in a long line that stretches back to Franz Boas, the Frankfurt School, and myriad others who now dominate the culture of Western suicide. He may call himself a race traitor, but there is every reason to believe that he has a sense of allegiance to his own people and the long history of hostility to the people and culture of the West that is so typical of highly committed Jews. For him, being a race traitor comes easily and naturally; it’s the mother’s milk of socialization as a Jew.
As fate would have it, the Jewish professor who so tormented me and other Whites in grad school had many similarities to Ignatiev, beginning with appearance:
And what MacDonald wrote about Ignatiev — “People like Ignatiev, who doubtless have a strong sense of their own ethnic identity and interests, have managed to pathologize any sense of ethnic identity and interests among Europeans and European-derived peoples — and no one else” — was true in spades of my graduate school oppressor. What we were exposed to in the 90s is identical to what various critics of Critical Race Theory are describing now — the struggle sessions, the mandatory lectures on “White privilege,” and the complete lack of debate or discussion. I had to watch as our esteemed professor subjected White individuals to withering criticism in class, first reducing a young woman to tears, then much to my disgust, a fellow White male grad student. It was awful.
While MacDonald did not use the phrase “Critical Race Theory” to label Ignatiev’s assault, he was in fact describing the same thing. Best, MacDonald saw through Ignatiev’s sophism to expose the real intent, something which others on TOO have done since, as we shall soon see. Before addressing that, however, I’d like to add an aside whose timing is too good to ignore. As I was about to embark on my dissertation after having completing coursework and exams, another Jewish professor gave me a book he had received gratis in the chance that he might review it. The professor opted not to and gave me the fresh copy:
Written in 1997 by law professor Stephen M. Feldman, the book was titled Please Don’t Wish Me a Merry Christmas: A Critical History of the Separation of Church and State (NYU Press). The subtitle containing “Critical History” points to the fact that the sponsor of the book was the Critical America Series from NYU Press, whose myriad titles revealed by the link can be enjoyed at readers’ leisure. Oh, I should mention that the very first words of the Introduction are: “I am Jewish.” Thus began another “culture of critique” attack on Western man and his major holiday.
Andrew Joyce on “Whiteness Studies”
The Occidental Observer was extremely fortunate to attract the considerable writing skills of Andrew Joyce, beginning with his Limerick “pogrom”: Creating Jewish victimhood, posted on St. Patrick’s Day in 2012. By 2015, however, he had written what can be seen as an extension of MacDonald’s 2008 unpacking of Ignatiev’s brutal intellectual campaign. In “Jews, Communists and Genocidal Hate in ‘Whiteness Studies,’” Joyce drew on MacDonald to show that “Ignatiev only very thinly disguised the unrestrained hatred that his ‘discipline’ incites against Whites and their culture.” Further quoting MacDonald, Joyce noted that
Ignatiev et al. have developed a story that goes as follows: A bunch of very bad people got together and created a category called “white” to which they belong but people with different colored skin can’t belong. Then they made laws that favored people in the white category, they colluded with other whites to dominate the economic and political process, and they invented baseless scientific theories in which whiteness had its roots in real biological differences.
All Ignatiev’s written material that we’ve seen carries the same odd message with the same extreme wording…Ignatiev writes darkly and dramatically of “abolishing the white race,” “genocide of whites,” etc. When pressed, he emphasizes that that he doesn’t really mean killing people who call themselves white. He only wants to destroy the concept of whiteness. So he’s off the hook, right?
Not quite. Ignatiev is really just playing a game of bait and switch. While fully tuned-in to his own Jewish racial identity, he ostensibly follows the PC line that “races” are only “social constructs.” When pressed, he claims to be little more than an extreme egalitarian, against all social hierarchies but especially those in which he imagines Whites to be at the top.
Like MacDonald, Joyce easily sees through Ignatiev’s gambit, writing that “The party line, therefore, is that it’s all about getting White people to stop thinking that they are White – for their own good of course. So while Black studies, women’s studies, Chicano studies etc. all aim to develop and nurture their relative identities and social agendas, ‘Whiteness Studies’ aims to utterly extinguish any sense of identity and awareness of group interests,” a very important distinction indeed.
Much of what Joyce wrote was very familiar to me by 2015. For instance, the wife of Frankfurt School member Herbert Marcuse “devoted much of her time to pushing her ideology through her ‘Unlearning Racism’ workshops, and indoctrinating White teenagers into supporting multiculturalism through her Oakland-based ‘New Bridges’ group.” Another Jewish woman, Ruth Frankenberg, wrote in 1993 that the dogma of her Whiteness discipline
orbits around the belief that race is nothing more than a fluid social, political and historical construct. She argued that while Whites may deny that they are ‘racist,’ they cannot deny that they are White. Frankenberg proceeded to argue that Whites are implicitly racist by virtue of their ‘dominant’ position in western society, and contended that we should ‘critically reflect’ on this social position of dominance that White people occupy in our society. ‘Whiteness Studies’ to Frankenberg, like her predecessors, was therefore nothing more than an exercise in convincing Whites that they are oppressors, whether they wished to be or not, and whether they had actually personally taken part in any oppression or not.
Been there, heard that back in the 90s. I’m sorry now that the broader public is hearing and being submitted to the same thing in the Biden Era.
Joyce had other good things to say. For instance, he found a section from Savitri Devi’s The Lightning and the Sun to be useful in exposing the deceit employed in Jewish aggression:
Inconspicuous, slow, yet implacable persecution, both economic and cultural: the systematic suppression of all possibilities for the vanquished, without it ‘showing,’ the merciless ‘conditioning’ of children, all the more horrible that it is more impersonal, more indirect, more outwardly ‘gentle,’ the clever diffusion of soul-killing lies; violence under the cover of non-violence.
“Violence under the cover of non-violence” — although it could certainly morph into violence if Whites lose power to the rising tide of color, and indeed, we can already see the rise in anti-White violence in the interracial crime statistics and incidents like these, as compiled by AmRen. It was tactics like these that caused me so much distress as an isolated and powerless grad student years ago. Back then I knew of no Kevin MacDonald or Andrew Joyce who could guide me through those roiled waters. While I could recognize my professor’s method as a deliberate form of social engineering, I couldn’t yet figure out how it was done, so I was demoralized because, as E. Michael Jones said in the epigraph which begins this essay, “To be effective, social engineering cannot be perceived,” and I could not fully perceive what these words meant, even as I felt their sting and saw their near universal effectiveness, just as I fear their effectiveness now.
Since grad school, my goal has been to understand this social engineering and explain it to others, which I have attempted relentlessly, in the classroom and in these columns. I now find comfort in the company of men like Andrew Joyce, who concluded in this White Studies piece,
The ‘educational’ programs of the ADL, the obliteration of our national borders, the assassination of our racial identity, and the slow genocide of our people are being accomplished without the bullet, bomb or blades. But it is, and will be, tremendously violent in its implications. Whiteness studies are not part of an academic discipline in any true sense of that term. The genre is an act of inter-ethnic aggression.
Joyce revisited Jewish involvement in Whiteness Studies (again, a close cognate, in my view, of Critical Race Theory) in 2020 with “Review of Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility,” a book that “is heavily and transparently influenced by Jewish thought and by Jewish pioneers in the field she now finds so conducive to fame and fortune.”
Sure enough, Joyce found concrete evidence of this in the bibliography — “so many names from my research on Whiteness Studies. They were almost all there, protruding from the page like shunned relatives at a family reunion — Noel Ignatiev, George Lipsitz, Ruth Frankenberg, Michelle Fine, Lois Weis, along with helpful co-ethnics like Thomas Shapiro, David Wellman, Sander Gilman, Larry Adelman, and Jay Kaufman. These are DiAngelo’s mentors and intellectual forbears …” We are definitely seeing a pattern here.
Critical Race Theory in the News Today
I originally began this essay with a story about Lt. Colonel Matthew Lohmeier, who was fired for publicizing his views on the introduction of CRT into the military. Admittedly, it was asking for trouble to publish a book titled Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Militaryin today’s current climate, but he did. In an online Revolver article concerning the controversy, we find that “Lohmeier appeared on several podcasts to promote his book, and in response the Pentagon fired him. According to the DoD, his statements caused a ‘loss of trust and confidence in his ability to lead.’”
The article continued, “As far as Revolver and tens of millions of American patriots are concerned, Lohmeier’s actions represent the very pinnacle of courage and leadership,” an opinion I’ll second. Still, based on this interview, it seems Lohmeier could benefit from exposure to MacDonald’s Culture of Critique or my short discussion of White Studies above. When a term like “Marxist Race Theory” is used by an author, is it knowingly used as shorthand for “Jewish”? My impression given this interview and my brief exposure to Revolver’s approach is “No.” And that’s a problem. Consider Lohmeier’s words:
I am often asked, “how did this happen?” or, “when did this happen?” How is it, for example, that American people and institutions — predominantly our education system, and now, all federal agencies including even our military services — increasingly resonate and align with Marxist thought? How is it that Americans can now so easily question or forget the greatness of the American ideal and become victims to the tactics of subversion? Why haven’t we been able to recognize our slide into Marxism? There are two ways this has happened: gradually, then suddenly. …
Obviously, if he’s read The Culture of Critique, he knows “how this happened.” Given his relatively young age, if he’s followed the podcasts of The Daily Shoah or read more than a few dozen Andrew Anglin stories on The Daily Stormer, then he knows how this happened. My suspicion, however, is that he has no idea, so someone should forward him this article.
Anyone following American academia for the last three decades will know of the intense leftist slant gaining power with each passing year, and students of politics, the legal system and corporate affairs will be similarly aware. It only makes sense that it was slower to reach the military and that there was some pushback, summed up by Lohmeier with the statement, “There is a growing perception that the preponderance of political partisanship occurring in our armed forces is radical leftist partisanship.” Well, yes it is.
Next, does Lohmeier view the introduction of CRT into the military as being generically harmful, or does he see it as specifically anti-White? Based on the interview, it’s likely that he sees the anti-White import of official programs in today’s military, writing as he does that in one chapter he is critical of an essayist who sees her role in a project “as an attempt to ‘decenter whiteness.’” Sounds like we’re getting back to the White Studies aspect of CRT.
But is it even necessary to ask whether CRT can be evaluated as generically undemocratic or even racist rather than being specifically anti-White? Apparently it is, as a VDARE writer styling himself as “Washington Watcher II” has done in a blog called “Fight Against Critical Race Theory — But They Still Flinch From Calling It Anti-White Racism.” Note the subtitle claiming “They Still Flinch from Calling it Anti-White Racism.” Kind of hard to believe. But Washington Watcher found a CRT critic who “essentially argued that race doesn’t exist, a favorite of Conservatism, Inc. And along with many other cuckservatives, he promotes the cringe idea that CRT is bad because it harms non-whites.” Yes, it really is hard to believe. Our thanks to Washington Watcher for making this distinction clear, especially in his conclusion when he beseeches us to “Repeat after me: CRT isn’t just racism; it’s anti-white racism.”
We’ve reached the point where some are stepping forward to point out the obvious truth that CRT is in fact “anti-White racism.” Much to my surprise, however, I’ve seen little or no evidence that people have pointed to the far more instructive issue that while it is of course anti-White racism, it has been propagated by a long string of Jews for over fifty years. This is because Jews are prosecuting a deadly war on Whites, with previous examples such as the Bolshevik era in Russia, the Holodomor, and the various “cold” strategies documented in The Culture of Critiquesuch as boosting non-white immigration and depressing White family formation. This is the point I am at pains to emphasize.
The consequences of this are immense, beginning with MacDonald’s claim in his 2008 TOO article that after demonizing Whites (or “Whiteness”), “it doesn’t take much imagination to suppose that actual genocide of Whites is the next step.” I couldn’t agree more and have stressed this point for over twelve years here on TOO.Subscribe
I’ll close with a succinct version of all I’ve written about above, one that uses plain language to cut through sometimes lengthy analyses. On June 10, 2021 Andrew Anglin published a piece called Psychoanalytic Journal Publishes Paper Calling “Whiteness” a “Malignant, Parasitic-Like Condition” which is a sort of companion piece to Aruna Khilanani’s fulminations as discussed by MacDonald in “Expressions of Anti-White Hatred in High Places: Aruna Khilanani at Yale” published two days earlier. MacDonald states that “Jews have been a necessary condition for creating multicultural America” and that “It’s no surprise that Khilanani is a textbook example of the influence of the Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory, the forerunner of Critical Race Theory.”
Clearly, Anglin knows the work of Noel Ignatiev and his theories of Whiteness Studies, and immediately recognizes their import to the confessions of the non-white female psychiatrist:
This whole thing of claiming that “whiteness” is somehow different than “being a white person” is just a ruse. No one thinks that makes sense, including the people saying it. They are talking simply about white people.
They want to wipe out white people.
Recently, we saw the Indian psychologist – psychologist again! – Aruna Khilanani saying that she just wants to kill random white people. She didn’t say kill random “people infected with whiteness” – she just said white people.
Talking about “whiteness” as some kind of abstraction is a way for these people to really start pumping up the genocidal mania under a thin veil of semantics.
This puts me in mind of the predictions of Tomislav Sunic in his 2007 book Homo Americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age, where he argued that “in order for the proper functioning of future Americanized society, the removal of millions of surplus citizens must become a social and possibly also an ecological necessity.” MacDonald in those years of writing about “Stalin’s Willing Executioners” (i.e. Jews) identified what sectors might be targeted “and therefore worthy of mass murder by the American counterparts of the Jewish elite in the Soviet Union.” Further,
It is easy to imagine which sectors of American society would have been deemed overly backward and religious and therefore worthy of mass murder by the American counterparts of the Jewish elite in the Soviet Union — the ones who journeyed to Ellis Island instead of Moscow. The descendants of these overly backward and religious people now loom large among the “red state” voters who have been so important in recent national elections. Jewish animosity toward the Christian culture that is so deeply ingrained in much of America is legendary. As Joel Kotkin points out, “for generations, [American] Jews have viewed religious conservatives with a combination of fear and disdain.” And as Elliott Abrams notes, the American Jewish community “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.” These attitudes are well captured in Steven Steinlight’s charge that the Americans who approved the immigration restriction legislation of the 1920s — the vast majority of the population — were a “thoughtless mob” and that the legislation itself was “evil, xenophobic, anti-Semitic,” “vilely discriminatory,” a “vast moral failure,” a “monstrous policy.” In the end, the dark view of traditional Slavs and their culture that facilitated the participation of so many Eastern European shtetl Jews in becoming willing executioners in the name of international socialism is not very different from the views of contemporary American Jews about a majority of their fellow countrymen.
In his June 10, 2021 entry Anglin issued a similar warning, one I feel is a fitting close to this essay:
We are right on the verge of a large-scale culling.
We’ve talked about “white genocide” in terms of mass immigration and using feminism to restrict our breeding — but this cold genocide is about to get hot.
“My ex-wife and I were both raised to believe that men and women should be equal, and both partners should be working. It was detrimental to our children and relationship.” This was a comment left on my video “Women are No Longer Marriage Material.” Most children are being raised to believe that men and women should be equal and as “partners.” They should both be working outside of the home. This makes life much more difficult on everyone when there is no division of roles.
Women, God’s ways aren’t for our harm but for our good. He is the One who created us. He didn’t create men and women the same. We are different, and we have different roles. Women trying to be men and even superior to them has only caused harm to families, marriages, children, and culture.
Anthony, from 21 Studios shared my video on his page. Here are some of the comments that men left.
“Feminism was created and installed in America by an outside enemy. If you haven’t figure out yet this is a weapon to destroy a county, you aren’t awake.”
“My wife and I have been together for 14 years, then she started watching shows like The Viewand she went along with her single mother friends and cousins. My wife and I were best friends. There was nobody I wanted to spend my time and energy with more so than her. Now, I can’t stand her. Just the other day, I ended up heartbroken when I realized that I don’t love her anymore. I’ve just tolerated her for the sake of my son.”
“The really infuriating part is that parents have let the government turn their daughters into debt/tax servants over the last 20 years. It’s too late to apologize now.”
“My manager has a wife who is completely a homemaker. She looks great, always happy, and just idolizes him. He has a pretty hectic career, but she completely takes care of the home and keeps him on track. They have a child, and she just looks so fulfilled. This video is completely spot on, and I really admire her honesty.”
“A man’s list of things a woman needs to do to make him happy: full stomach, regular sex, and peace and quiet sometimes. Women’s list of things a man needs to do to make her happy: not enough room to list it all here. It would take pages. Yet women are the ones saying men are too controlling and expect too much.”
“You are right! My wife turned from God and now is following feminism which is satanism. These societies hate God. It hates the truth. It hates children.”
“Everything she said in this video is exactly what men have been dying to speak up about for years now, but men can’t because it’s considered sexist, misogynistic, or hateful to hold any sort of criticisms against women.”
“This is a very wise and correct woman. Most women today are very selfish, argumentative, and defiant. When women try to lead the relationship, it is doomed to misery and failure because it’s not natural. I’m in one of these relationships now, and it really sucks. I have a deep sadness in my heart, because I know that a relationship should be more fun and mutual. It’s not.”
It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop, than with a brawling [quarrelsome, contentious] woman in a wide house. Proverbs 21:9