(Priest performs last rites for Christian who died in bubonic plague 1347-1351, which killed as many as 200 million.) In response to my article, “Their Sole Purpose is to Destroy Us- Their Lame Excuses are Diversions,”(May 13) a “David” left this comment: “As I see it , until every synagogue (sin-agog) has been torched and every Masonic Lodge razed, every Jew ( yes…ALL, for they are ALL complicit ) and every Freemason slaughtered, humanity will have NO chance of living in peace and serving our Creator. A Bishop friend and inspiration, in consideration of these manifestations of Satan stated calmly and with authority, “There is no sin in killing that which is already dead.” (Dead to The Father, to Spirit, our Creator, the very Source of Life here and throughout the Universe.)” Makow – As an ethnic Jew, naturally I take exception to this idea. People who regard themselves as innocent victims are the first to victimize other innocent people. But worse, killing all Jews would not change anything since the Jewish disease (Cabalism, Satanism) has spread to the goyim through Freemasonry. Do you think Anthony Fauci, Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, Lindsey Graham or Doug Ford are ethnic Jews? Altiyan Childs has revealed that practically everyone who is successful belongs to a satanic cult, Freemasonry. Gentiles are more pro-Israel than many US Jews who hate what Israel is doing to the Palestinians. Ten percent of US Jews support boycotting Israel. “Antisemites” conflate the Jewish problem to the point that they miss the target altogether. The target should be the Masonic Jewish world banking cartel and its proxies, Organized Jewry and Freemasonry. Judaism like Freemasonry is a secret society. Only the initiated know the true satanic agenda (to enslave and dispossess mankind.) Does being duped carry a death penalty? Yes, globalism = Communism = Cabalist Judaism = covid scam. See“What is Communism?” Yes, a great many Jews are a subversive satanic influence. But many other Jews are assimilated like myself and put the common interest first. Mankind would flourish if it discerned and obeyed God’s instructions. God is the Moral Order. The Creator’s instructions are indispensable. The reason this is so hard to hear is that the satanists have possessed us. We are satanically possessed. God is the bliss we are all really seeking. Let’s focus on the manipulators, not the manipulated. Fundamental change will never happen until central banks are disbanded and nations gain control of their credit and currency. Full comment is hereby “David”(henrymakow.com) [Mullins begins by showing how Jews destroyed every civilization they were part of.] [This is probably from Mullins’s “A New History of the Jews” (1968] A few excerpts from the works of Eustace Mullinsshed further light on the Jewish monster.
“As President of theInternational Institute of Jewish Studies, and having spent thirty-six years of constant research on the Jewish problem, I state with certainty that to be Jew-wise is to survive. To accept Jewish domination not only means that one abandons all precepts of human civilization which have accreted over five thousand years of recorded history: it also means that one accepts a zombie mode of existence, a life in death which excludes all of the glory and honor of living in Christ. Being Jew-wise means that one recognizes the basic precepts of the Jewish problem. The first precept is — ” THE JEW ALWAYS EXISTS IN A STATE OF WAR WITH ALL CIVILIZED NATIONS”. There can be no peace between the biological parasite and the host people. The second precept i s — “EVERY JEW IS AN AGENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL”. No Jew can hold a position in any Gentile government unless he wields that position to advance the cause of the State of Israel. Even if he wished to do so, no Jew could escape the total mobilization of the Jewish people in their war against the gentiles. The third precept is — ” THE JEW ALWAYS KNOWS WHO HE IS”. When I first encountered Jews, I was mildly disturbed by the cool manner of self-confidence with which they regarded me. I did not understand that they were looking at me from their pedestal of self knowledge, while I did not yet know who I was, who my enemies were; or who my friends were. In almost every instance, the Gentile fails to understand what is going on in the struggle between the biological parasite and the host people, or if he does get an inkling of what is going on, he finds out too little and too late. The fourth precept is–“WHATEVER AMBITIONS YOU MAY HAVE, YOU CANNOT REALIZE THESE GOALS BECAUSE OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JEW”. It is the function of the Jew to systematically destroy the habitat and the life style of the host people. This renders them unable to resist or to dislodge his parasitic presence. At the beginning of this biological relationship, it is the Jew who is the displaced person, seeking a place for himself, while the host is secure in his home. In establishing his biological presence among the host people, the Jew works furiously to replace the life style of the host with a totally synthetic environment, tailored to the needs and purposes of the Jew. With spider-like precision, the Jew spins his web about the host people, using satire, pornography, and the host’s own system of communications to entrap them in the web of the Jew. “When the web is complete, the host is unable to move, and finds himself at the mercy of the Jew, who is not slow to administer his fatal poison.” ————————Related- Eustace Mullins – The Secret Holocaust Eustace Mullins –My Struggle Against The Jews This eye-opening account shows how Organized Jewry has controlled the US, including the FBI, for more than one hundred years. Makow – The Devil and the Jews ————– Even Jews Ask: Is Judaism a Satanic Cult?In 2018, 89 Senators and Congressmen Held Dual Citizenship with Israel i.e. 15% are a Fifth Column. Then, most of the Demonrats are communists.
[Excerpted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively through VDARE.com]
Earlier this year I read Christopher Caldwell’s very striking book The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties. Caldwell argued that the reforms of the 1960s, which seemed necessary and humane at the time to correct obvious injustices, had serious negative consequences, leading eventually to many of the issues that so divide and anger us today. A powerful and brilliant essay by politicalscientist Richard Hanania has just followed up on this insight.
Caldwell instanced the SCOTUS ruling in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971). A core issue in the case, though not the only one: Could that North Carolina power plant give aptitude tests for purposes of hiring and promotion, given that blacks failed these tests at much higher rates than whites? The Supremes, with Chief Justice Burger(needless to say, a Nixon appointee) writing the majority opinion, ruled unanimously that they couldn’t.
The Griggs decision made clear that the government was now authorized to act against racism even if there was no evidence of any racist intent. This was an opening to arbitrary power. And once arbitrary power is conferred, it matters little what it was conferred for.
The Griggs case duly features in Hanania’s essay:
An important watershed was the decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971), in which the Supreme Court ruled that intelligence tests, because they were not shown to be directly related to job performance, could not be used in hiring since blacks scored lower on them, and it did not matter whether there was any intent to discriminate. People act as if “standardized tests are racist if they show disparities” is some kind of new idea, but it’s basically been the law in the United States for 50 years, albeit inconsistently enforced.
Hanania’s essay is my Opinion Column of the Month, if not the year. He traces what we now call “Wokeness” back to the good intentions and resulting laws of the 1960s—most obviously the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
That act was meant to combat intentional discrimination; but as the Griggs decision showed, the goalposts were easily shifted to cover any kind of unequal outcome,what today’s Wokesters call “inequity.” Intent need not necessarily have anything to do with it. That, as Christopher Caldwell wrote, was “an opening to arbitrary power.” It meant Affirmative Action a.k.a. anti-white quotas.
The genius of Hanania’s essay is that it tracks the progress of that arbitrary power through first the courts, then government bureaucracies, all the way into the private sector.
As the judges, the bureaucrats, and the law firms gathered more and more of that “arbitrary power” that Caldwell warned against, the concept of a “hostile work environment” came up, with lethal consequences for freedom of speech. If just one person in a workplace takes exception to something a coworker says, there’s a big fat lawsuit right there.
If Richard Hanania’s essay is my is my Opinion Column of the Month, then my Chart of the Month is one reproduced in the essay that he has borrowed from a book titled Inventing Equal Opportunity by Harvard sociologist Frank Dobbin.
At the left-hand side of the chart, in 1951, there were just fifty thousand people in this line of work, mostly men. At the right-hand end, which looks like 1998, there were over nine hundred thousand—almost twenty times as many—and seventy percent were female.
My very confident guess is, that the trend has continued uniformly at least, quite possibly exponentially, in the 23 years since 1998.
(As well as being curious to see an updated version of that graph, I’d like to see one with a racial breakdown. The stereotype of a Human Resources manager isn’t just female, she’s female and black—the one in the popular TV show The Big Bang Theory, for example.
What are all those personnel managers doing all day long? Well, some of it is the stuff that clerical staff at public and private organizations have always done: arranging hiring and exit interviews, minding employee benefits, arbitrating petty disputes, and so on.
Civil rights law makes all major institutions subject to the will of left-wing bureaucrats, activists, and judges at the expense of normal citizens.
So the Great Awokening of the early 2010s did not come out of nowhere. It was the flowering, the maturing—with a big assist from the rise of the smartphone and Social Media— of a decades-long effort on the part of judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers to push the doctrine of Disparate Impact into every corner of the national life.
The truly poisonous aspect of this is that Disparate Impact is a lie. It is not true that “inequities”—inequalities of group outcomes—must be due to malice, to intentional discrimination. They may simply be due to nature.
I’ll quote Hanania again. I won’t apologize for all the quotes I’m borrowing from him: He’s very quotable:
The strange thing about Disparate Impact is that gaps exist almost everywhere. Practically any criterion or test one develops is going to have gaps between racial groups and the two sexes. In a world where everyone has standards that create a Disparate Impact, government bureaucrats have a lot of discretion in who they go after.
And there we are again, back with Christopher Caldwell’s warning against arbitrary power.
Yes, the Civil Rights Revolution outlawed some old injustices. In the America of today, though, there is no discernible public appetite for the return of those old injustices.
A far more important result of the Civil Rights Revolution for us today has been the vast expansion of power over our lives and property that we have given to judges, government bureaucrats, and lawyers, with corresponding loss to our liberties.
Is there anything we can do? Richard Hanania is scathing about the defeatism of Establishment Conservatives on this point. They have no constructive ideas about how to deal with Wokeness, even though it is, he says, “the animating issue in their party.” (That, I guess would be the Republican Party).
Tens of millions of Americans desperately want something done to push back that arbitrary power, to restore the freedoms we thought were guaranteed to us by our Constitution. That’s much of what Trumpism was all about.
Trump himself understood this only occasionally, fleetingly, but at least he had a clue.
The sixteen institutional Republicans he triumphed over in the 2016 GOP primaries had no clue. They just mumbled about tax cuts, improving the schools, spreading democracy, and the evils of socialized medicine.
So what’s Richard Hanania’s prescription? I’ll quote him again—for the last time, I swear:
Eliminating Disparate Impact, making the law require evidence of intentional discrimination.
Getting rid of the concept of hostile work environment, or defining it in extremely narrow and explicit terms, making sure that it does not restrict political or religious speech.
Repealing the executive orders that created and expanded affirmative action among government contractors and the federal workforce.
A Republican administration, he says, could do much of this through the executive branch and the courts, without any need to try passing laws through our dysfunctional Congress. It just needs an Administration that will focus intensively, unblinkingly on slaying the Wokeness monster. It can be slain, he says.
Can it, though? Here I feel the tug of my own temperamental pessimism. That’s an awful lot of iron rice bowls you’re looking to break there, sir.
Remembering what the media and the bureaucracy—especially the so-called intelligence agencies—did to Trump, whose Trumpism was no more than half-hearted, imagine how they’d deal with a really dedicated Trumpist.
Richard Hanania himself shows awareness of the great difficulties here. He gives a passing mention to Julian the Apostate, the fourth-century Roman Emperor who came to power when Christianity had already settled in as the Empire’s state religion.
Julian was raised a Christian but rejected the faith when he reached adulthood. As Emperor he tried to roll back Christianity and re-instate the old polytheism.
It didn’t work. The legend is that Julian’s dying words were Vicisti, Galilaee, “You have won, Galilean,” referring of course to Jesus.
A Trumpist president, if we can get one, might depart the world at last murmuring some similar obeisance to the ghost of Chief Justice Burger.
As, of course, would the Historic American Nation.
A few days ago, I shared a post on my Facebook page that was written by a group called “The Gentle Mamma.” It was titled, “Hold Your Sons.” In it was written, “Put your hand over their hearts and send them the purest love in existence.” Only God’s love is pure. Pure love is spelled out in 1 Corinthians 13. Most of us fall short on a daily basis of anything close to pure love.
“Tell them their emotions matter.” This is where people were confused. How can this be wrong? I wrote above this post that mothers should teach their sons to be led by truth rather than by their emotions. Many argued this point with me. “Aren’t men supposed to have emotions?”
Women tend to struggle with their emotional nature. God created us with more of an emotional nature in order to be home raising our children. We’re more in tune with our children because of this. We tend to be more sensitive, but it’s easy for us to be led by our emotions.
Are emotions bad? No. This is where the confusion comes in. Crying when someone dies. Reading a story and crying because of sorrow. Laughing at jokes. Weeping with those who weep. Rejoicing with those who rejoice. Mourning with those who mourn. All of these are healthy ways to use our emotions, but women tend to cry a whole lot more than men if you’ve noticed. I am thankful that my husband is stronger emotionally than me. This is a good thing!
How do women use their emotions in a wrong way? They use them to manipulate. When they’re not getting what they want from their husbands, they will give their husbands the silent treatment in order to get their way. They will throw temper tantrums at times too. Something will get into their minds and instead of taking it captive to the obedience of Christ, they will turn a mole hill into a mountain and burst out in rage at their husbands. When they are tired, they will become moody and mean. All of these are ways women tend to be more led by their emotions in a wrong way.
We can’t allow our emotions to control us. We must take our emotions captive to the obedience of Christ and allow truth to control our emotions. I know grown adult women who have ruined almost every single one of their families’ vacations by having emotional outbursts and saying things they should not say. I have heard adult women screaming at their husbands in anger. Other women refuse to give their husbands sex for weeks because they are angry with them, or they won’t talk to them for days on end. These are all ways women allow their emotions to control them, and these gentle mammas want to raise sons like this?
In raising two boys and two girls, yes, they were all emotional as small children but as they grew older, the girls had a lot harder time dealing with their emotions than our sons. It’s the way God created them. The hormones coursing through women is a big part of this, but you must teach your daughters to not allow these emotions to control them. It’s a gift you give to their future husbands.
These gentle mammas want to turn their sons into women. This is the goal of our culture these days, if you haven’t noticed. They want to erase genders. Well, that’s at least what they say. They falsely believe that women are better than men. “The future is female” is what young women are being taught. “There would be no more wars without men!” False. Did you know the highest rate of domestic abuse is between lesbians? It’s because they are being completely controlled by their emotions rather than by Truth.
Men tend to be more ruled by logic and reason. Women tend to be more ruled by emotions and feelings. This is one of the reasons why God put men in charge in the homes and churches (and elsewhere in my opinion). Women are the weaker vessel (1 Peter 3:7) and are deceived more easily (1 Timothy 2:14).
Raise your sons to be controlled by Truth rather than by their emotions, mothers. Sure, it’s okay if they cry at times and share their hurts with you. But when it comes to anger, rage, and being upset, teach them to control these emotions in a productive way rather than in a destructive way, and teach your daughters to not use their emotions in a manipulative way to get what they want.
Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ. 2 Corinthians 10:5
On June 6, 1968, Robert Kennedy had just won the California Democratic presidential primary, when he was shot dead, five years after his brother. David Talbot has shown in his book Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years, published in 2007 by Simon & Schuster, that Robert had never believed in the conclusion of the Warren Commission Report, and that, had he succeeded in becoming the next American president, he would have done his utmost to set up a new investigation. Whether he would have been able to get to the bottom of it is another matter. But it is a reasonable assumption that the forces that had killed John were the same that killed Robert on his way to reclaim the White House. After all, as Laurence Leamer writes in Sons of Camelot: “Bobby had been the president’s alter ego and protector. . . . He had loved his brother so intensely and served him so well that within the administration it was hard to tell where one man ended and the other began.” After 1963, Robert was still his brother’s continuation. He was the heir and the avenger.
That is why I have argued before — and I repeat in my new book — that the ultimate key to the JFK whodunit is in RFK’s assassination, which has a very clear, unmistakable Israeli signature. RFK’s assassination is a masterwork of false flag operation, designed by a supremely intelligent, Machiavellian, and organized cabal, the same that orchestrated one year earlier, with Johnson’s complicity, the attempted false flag attack on the USS Liberty (watch the new groundbreaking four-part documentary film Sacrificing Liberty).
What is truly extraordinary, and demonstrates an unmatched expertise in the industry of lies, is that the conspirators succeeded to get rid of Robert Kennedy while at the same time blaming the assassination on their enemies — the Palestinians — and thereby giving themselves both an alibi and a victim’s role: through RFK, Israel was the target, they claim.
Sirhan Sirhan, the “virulent anti-Semite”
Just hours after Robert’s assassination, the press informed the American people, not only of the identity of the assassin, but also of his motive, and even of his detailed biography. Twenty-four-year-old Sirhan Bishara Sirhan was born in Jordan, and had moved to the United States when his family was expelled from West Jerusalem in 1948. After the shooting, a newspaper clipping was found in Sirhan’s pocket, quoting Robert’s following statement: “The United States should without delay sell Israel the 50 Phantom jets she has so long been promised.” Handwritten notes by Sirhan found in a notebook at his home confirmed that his act had been premeditated and motivated by his hatred of Israel.
That became the mainstream storyline from day one. Jerry Cohen of the Los Angeles Times wrote a front page article, saying that Sirhan is “described by acquaintances as a ‘virulent’ anti-Israeli” (Cohen changed that into “virulent anti-Semite” in an article for the Salt Lake Tribune), and that: “Investigation and disclosures from persons who knew him best revealed [him] as a young man with a supreme hatred for the state of Israel.” Cohen infers that “Senator Kennedy . . . became a personification of that hatred because of his recent pro-Israeli statements.” Cohen further revealed that, about three weeks before the shooting, Sirhan wrote “a memo to himself” that said, “Kennedy must be assassinated before June 5, 1968,” that is, Cohen notes, “the first anniversary of the six-day war in which Israel humiliated three Arab neighbors, Egypt, Syria and Jordan.”
After September 11, 2001, the tragedy of Robert’s assassination was rewritten and installed into the Neocon mythology of the “Clash of Civilizations” and the “War on Terror.” A book entitled The Forgotten Terrorist, by Mel Ayton (2007), purports to present “a wealth of evidence about [Sirhan’s] fanatical Palestinian nationalism,” and to demonstrate that “[Sirhan’s] politically motivated act was a forerunner of present-day terrorism.”
In 2008, on the occasion of the 40thanniversary of Bobby’s murder, Sasha Issenberg of the Boston Globe recalled that the death of Robert Kennedy was “a first taste of Mideast terror.” He quotes Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz saying: “It was in some ways the beginning of Islamic terrorism in America. It was the first shot. A lot of us didn’t recognize it at the time.” That Sirhan was from a Christian family was lost on Dershowitz.
Rabbi Jeffrey Salkin took care to mentionit in TheForward, only to add that Islamic fanaticism ran in his veins anyway: “But what he shared with his Muslim cousins — the perpetrators of September 11 — was a visceral, irrational hatred of Israel. It drove him to murder a man whom some still believe might have been the greatest hope of an earlier generation. . . . Sirhan hated Kennedy because he had supported Israel.”
And so, the Forward insists: “One cannot help but note the parallel between [Robert] Kennedy’s assassination and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In both tragic cases, Arab fanaticism reared its ugly head on American soil, irrevocably changing the course of events in this country.” And the lesson: “In remembering Bobby Kennedy, let us remember not just what he lived for, but also what he died for — namely, the precious nature of the American-Israeli relationship.” In other words: let’s propagate the narrative, for it is good for Israel.
On the fiftieth anniversary, the narrative was well rehearsed: Robert got killed because he was “pro-Israel”. Therefore his murder was a crime against Israel.
For anyone familiar with the history of the Kennedy clan, there is something odd in the notion that the assassination of Robert Kennedy was a crime against Israel. Robert had not been, in his brother’s government, a pro-Israel Attorney General. He had infuriated Zionist leaders by supporting an investigation led by Senator William Fulbright and the Committee on Foreign Relations, aimed at registering the American Zionist Council as a “foreign agent”, which would had considerably hindered its efficiency.
In 1968, Robert Kennedy had not suddenly turned pro-Israel. He was simply trying to attract Jewish votes, as everyone else. Robert’s statement in an Oregon synagogue, mentioned in the May 27 Pasadena Independent Star-News article found in Sirhan’s pocket, didn’t exceed the minimal requirements. Its author David Lawrence had, in another article entitled “Paradoxical Bob,” underlined how little credit should be given to such electoral promises: “Presidential candidates are out to get votes and some of them do not realize their own inconsistencies.” In fact, as Arthur Krock has noted, the supposed motive for RFK’s murder is itself paradoxical: “If this motive was his position that the United States was committed to preserve Israel as a nation, his statement was made with more moderation than that of other important political persons who said the same thing.”
All things considered, there is no ground for believing that Robert Kennedy would have been, as president of the U.S.A., particularly Israel-friendly.
Did Sirhan kill Robert Kennedy?
If we trust official statements and mainstream news, the assassination of Robert Kennedy is an open-and-shut case. The identity of the killer suffers no discussion, since he was arrested on the spot, with the smoking gun in his hand.
In reality, ballistic and forensic evidence shows that none of Sirhan’s bullets hit Kennedy. According to the autopsy report of Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner Thomas Noguchi, Robert Kennedy was hit by three bullets, while a fourth went through his coat. All these bullets were shot from behind Kennedy: two of them under his right armpit, following an upward angle, and the third, the fatal bullet, behind his right ear, at point blank range. Dr. Noguchi reaffirms his conclusion in his memoirs, Coroner (1983). Yet the sworn testimonies of twelve witnesses established that Robert had never turned his back on Sirhan and that Sirhan was five to six feet away from his target when he fired. Moreover, Sirhan was physically overpowered by Karl Uecker after his second shot, and, although he continued pressing the trigger mechanically, his revolver was not directed towards Kennedy anymore.
By tallying all the bullet impacts in the pantry, and those that wounded five people around Kennedy, it has been estimated that at least twelve bullets were fired, while Sirhan’s gun carried only eight. On April 23, 2011, attorneys William Pepper and Laurie Dusek gathered all this evidence and more in a 58-page file submitted to the Court of California, with a request that Sirhan’s case be reopened. They pointed out major irregularities in the 1968 trial, notably that the serial number of Sirhan’s pistol did not match the serial number of the pistol by which were test fired the bullets compared with those extracted from Robert’s brain. Pepper also provided a computer analysis of audio recordings during the shooting, made by engineer Philip Van Praag in 2008, which confirms that two guns are heard. Paul Schrade, a Kennedy confidant who was behind Robert during the shooting and received one of Sirhan’s bullets, has long believed there was a second shooter. He testified at Sirhan’s 2016 parole hearing, and told him: “the evidence clearly shows that you were not the gunman who shot Robert Kennedy.”Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his sister Kathleen have joined Schrade and supportthe call for a reinvestigation of the assassination.
The presence of a second shooter was mentioned by several witnesses and reported on the same day by a few news outlets. There are strong suspicions that Robert’s real assassin was Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard hired by the Hotel Ambassador, property of Zionist businessman Myer Schine. Cesar was stuck behind Kennedy at the moment of the shooting, and some people saw him draw his pistol. One of them, Don Schulman, positively saw him fire. Incredibly, Cesar’s weapon was never examined, and he was never interrogated, even though he did not conceal his hatred for the Kennedys.
Even if we assumed that Sirhan did kill Robert Kennedy, a second aspect of the case raises question: Sirhan seemed to be in a state of trance during the shooting, and of disorientation just after. More importantly, Sirhan has always claimed that he has never had any recollection of his act. Fifty years after the facts, he continues to declare: “I was told by my attorney that I shot and killed Senator Robert F. Kennedy and that to deny this would be completely futile, [but] I had and continue to have no memory of the shooting of Senator Kennedy.” He also claims to have no memory of “many things and incidents which took place in the weeks leading up to the shooting.” Some repetitive lines written of a notebook found in Sirhan’s bedroom, which Sirhan recognizes as his own handwriting but does not remember writing, are reminiscent of automatic writing: there is a whole page of fifteen repetitions of “RFK must die, Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated, assassinated, assassinated, assassinated,” suddenly turning to “I have never heard please pay to the order of of of of of.”
Psychiatric expertise, including lie-detector tests, has confirmed that Sirhan’s amnesia is not faked. Therefore, experts in hypnosis and mental manipulation believe that Sirhan has been submitted to hypnotic programming. “It was obvious that he had been programmed to kill Robert Kennedy and programmed to forget that he had been programmed,” stated Dr. Robert Blair.In 2008, Harvard University professor Daniel Brown, a noted expert in hypnosis and trauma memory loss, interviewed Sirhan for a total of 60 hours, and concluded that Sirhan, whom he classified among “high hypnotizables,” acted involuntarily under the effect of hypnotic suggestion: “His firing of the gun was neither under his voluntary control, nor done with conscious knowledge, but is likely a product of automatic hypnotic behavior and coercive control.” During his sessions with Dr. Brown, Sirhan could remember having been accompanied by an attractive woman, before suddenly finding himself at a shooting range with a weapon he did not know. According to Brown’s report, “Mr. Sirhan did not go with the intent to shoot Senator Kennedy, but did respond to a specific hypnotic cue given to him by that woman to enter ‘range mode,’ during which Mr. Sirhan automatically and involuntarily responded with a ‘flashback’ that he was shooting at a firing range at circle targets.” Later, attorney William Pepper found an entry in the police file that showed that, just days before the assassination, Sirhan had visited a firing range, accompanied by an unknown instructor.
Mossad, Mental control, and false-flag terrorism
We know that in the 1960s, American military agencies were experimenting on mental control. Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, son of Hungarian Jews, directed the infamous CIA MKUltra project, which, among other things, were to answer questions such as: “Can a person under hypnosis be forced to commit murder?” according to a declassified document dated May 1951.As Larry Romanoff has pointed out, MKUltra was an overwhelmingly Jewish enterprise, with people like Dr. John Gittinger, Harris Isbell, James Keehner, Lauretta Bender, Albert Kligman, Eugene Saenger, Chester Southam, Robert V. Lashbrook, Harold Abramson, Charles Geschickter, and Ray Treichler.
In his book Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations(2018), Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman has revealed that, in May 1968, the month preceding Robert Kennedy’s assassination, the Israeli Military Intelligence (AMAN) was planning to assassinate Yasser Arafat by hypnotically programming a Palestinian. The idea was proposed by a Navy psychologist named Binyamin Shalit, who claimed that, “if he was given a Palestinian prisoner — one of the thousands in Israeli jails — with the right characteristics, he could brainwash and hypnotize him into becoming a programmed killer. He would then be sent across the Jordan, join the Fatah there, and, when the opportunity arose, do away with Arafat.” The proposal was approved. Shalit selected a 28-year-old Palestinian from Bethlehem, whom he deemed easily suggestionnable. The operation failed, but it proves that, in 1968 precisely, Israel was practicing a method of assassination identical to the one used against Robert Kennedy.
Moreover, manipulating Palestinians to make them commit crimes, or committing crimes and blaming Palestinians for them, bears the signature of Israel. According to former Mossad agent, Victor Ostrovsky, in 1991 elements of the Mossad were plotting an attempt on the life of President George H. W. Bush. Bush had resisted an unprecedented pro-Israel lobbying campaign that called for $10 billion to help Jews immigrate from the former Soviet Union to Israel, complaining in a televised press conference on September 12 that “one thousand Jewish lobbyists are on Capitol Hill against little old me.” Worse, there was his policy of pressuring Israel to the negotiating table at the Madrid Conference by freezing their loan guarantees. Israel had had enough of him. The plan was to leak words to the Spanish police that terrorists were on their way, kill Bush and, in the midst of the confusion, release three Palestinians captured earlier and kill them on the spot.
It is well known that Israel has a long history and a grand expertise in false flag terrorism. A report of the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), quoted by the Washington Times on September 10, 2001, described the Israeli Intelligence agency as: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” That statement was made public on the day before 9/11.
The pattern dates from before the creation of the Jewish State, with the bombing of the King David Hotel, headquarter of the British authorities in Jerusalem, in the morning of July 22, 1946. Six terrorists of the Irgun dressed as Arabs brought 225 kg of explosives hidden in milk churns into the building. When a British officer became suspicious and gunshot ensued, the Irgun members fled after igniting the explosives. The explosion killed 91 people, mostly British, but also 15 Jews.
The strategy was repeated in Egypt during the summer of 1954, with Operation Susannah. The goal was to compromise the British’s withdrawal from the Suez Canal, demanded by Colonel Abdul Gamal Nasser with support from President Eisenhower. Egyptian Jews trained in Israel bombed several British targets, then put the blame on the Muslim Brotherhood. The accidental detonation of an explosive device allowed the exposure of the conspiracy, which led to the “Lavon Affair”, from the name of the Defense Minister who was held responsible.
There are more of the same stories in Gordon Thomas’s Gideon’s Spies: the Secret History of the Mossad (2009). By definition, false-flagged Arab terrorism is only exposed when it fails, and we cannot know how many such operations have been set up by the Mossad. But from the revelations of Ronen Bergman in Rise and Kill First, Sirhan sure looks like a typical made-in-Mossad Palestinian patsy.
There are still, of course, unanswered questions, such as: How did Sirhan find himself in the kitchen pantry of the Ambassador Hotel at midnight on June 6, 1968, with a pistol in his pocket? Sirhan himself declared it was by accident, or by mistake, but then he doesn’t remember much of that evening. Another question is: Why did Kennedy, after finishing his speech, exit the ballroom through the kitchen pantry, instead of walking through the crowd of his supporters, as he usually did? To this question, there is an answer: according to a campaign volunteer present at the scene and interviewed by Michael Piper, it was Frank Mankiewicz who insisted that Robert go this way. Now, isn’t it awkward that Mankiewicz had started his career in public relations “as civil rights director for the western branch of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith,” as he mentions in his autobiography. (The ADL, remember, was founded in 1913 by the B’nai B’rith to defend the convicted child rapist and murderer Leo Frank.) In 1991, Mankiewicz handled publicity for Oliver Stone’s film JFK.
(The full lecture is here)We are wasting our time discussing if the coronavirus is real or the lockdowns justified. They are real and justified in terms of the seditious goals of Agenda 21/30. UN Agenda 30 is the Missing Piece of the Puzzle. It Explains the Mask & Lockdown Insanity, and much more.“When we introduced into the State organism the poison of Liberalism its whole political complexion underwent a change. States have been seized with a mortal illness–blood poisoning. All that remains is to await the end of their death agony.” (Protocols of Zion, 9) “In order that the true meaning of things may not strike the goyim before the proper time, we shall mask it under the alleged ardent desire to serve the working classes…” (Protocols of Zion, 6) from Oct 8, 2020by Henry Makow PhD
Picture in your mind an Orwellian dystopia like 1984, a world in which you have no rights, no freedom, no property, no family, no country, no religion, no say, and no nothing. UN Agenda 21 is the blueprint for such a world. The infrastructure has already been built. (Agenda 2030 is a milestone in Agenda 21 i.e. Century 21.) This is the context in which all current events must be seen. We are wasting our time discussing if the coronavirus is real or the lockdowns justified. They are real and justified in terms of the seditious goals of Agenda 21/30. This is the picture into which all the puzzle pieces fit: Defund the police. Systemic racism. Climate change. Rural fires and displacement. Artificial intelligence. Mass surveillance. Transhumanism. Sustainability. They are all part of the UNAgenda 1984: A world police state. The scary part is that 179 countries signed on to this world government tyranny at the Rio Summit in 1992. That’s how advanced this agenda is, and for the most part, humanity is oblivious to this powerful and sinister conspiracy. The media doesn’t report it, and therefore we tended to dismiss Jeremiahs like Rosa Koire and Niki Raapana.
LOCKDOWN LUNACY IS BEGINNING OF SOMETHING MUCH WORSE They are literally constructing 1984. This is the logic behind the insanity we are witnessing. This is where our focus should be. I have been saying that the Cabalist Jewish bankers wish to extend their monopoly over government credit into a monopoly over everything.
In 1938, insider Chaim Rakovsky told his NKVD interrogator that the bankers created the Communist state as a “machine of total power” unprecedented in history. In the past, due to many factors, “there was always room for individual freedom. Do you understand that those who already partially rule over nations and worldly governments have pretensions to absolute domination? Understand that this is the only thing which they have not yet reached.”
Rosa Koire says Agenda 21 is “the blueprint, the action plan, to inventory and control, all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all education, all energy, all information, and all human needs in the world. It is a comprehensive plan.”
What is unsustainable? Agenda 21 posits, is that the middle-class lifestyle of owning property, a yard, and cars is not sustainable. “Life in the suburbs and rural areas is unsustainable because it produces too many greenhouse gas emissions,” Koire says, emulating the argument for dense urban planning. “It is the kind of thing that makes you sound crazy when you talk about it,” she says. “Well it is crazy, but we aren’t.” The fact that the bankers are going to this much trouble to enslave us gives me hope that they are not planning to kill us in an orchestrated nuclear war. But the bottom line is that we are being distracted from the big picture. Our minds have been trivialized. We are incapable of recognizing the danger in which we find ourselves. We are complicit in our own destruction. Rosa Koire is a beacon of light in very dark times. I will be watching all her videos; ordering her book and joining her organization. We need to establish anti-globalist groups in every city, town, and state if we are to stop enslavement.
Quotes from Rosa Koire: — “Community Oriented Policing (under the Department of Justice) will encourage, if not require, people to watch their neighbors and report suspicious activity. More activity will be identified as ‘crime’–such as obesity, smoking, drinking when you have a drinking problem, name-calling, leaving lights on, neglect (in someone’s perception) of children, elderly, and pets, driving when you could ride a bike, breaking a curfew, and failure to do mandatory volunteering. The ‘community’ will demand more law enforcement to restore order, and more rules and regulations will ensue. The lines between government and non-governmental groups will blur more and more as unelected local groups make policy decisions using the Delphi Technique to manufacture consensus. The Chinese and Russian models are instructive in what you can expect under Communitarianism. Read Nien Cheng’s Life and Death in Shanghai, and Alexsander Solzhenitsen’s The Gulag Archipelago for real world examples. The War on Terror is a Communitarian plan designed to terrorize YOU.” “The key thing to know about this is that of course, you have no input. Only comments and observations that support the pre-approved plan will be supported. All others will be written on a big pad of paper and discarded later. The illusion of public buy-in is all that is needed. The organizers can later point to the fact that they held a public meeting, a certain number of residents attended, public comment was taken, and the community approved the plan. The facilitator is often a private consultant who has been professionally trained in running and managing a meeting. This consultant has been hired by your city to fulfill the requirement that the project has been seen and supported by its citizens—it’s YOUR plan.” ― Rosa Koire, Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 “Delphi is used in school board meetings, in training, at neighborhood association meetings, and other places where the organizers want to give the appearance that they have listened to community opinion and incorporated it into their plan.” ― Rosa Koire, Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 Related– Koire interview with Spiro Skouras – 1964- The Endgame COVID 19 is Linchpin of NWO Blueprint https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/
An award-winning investigative journalist, James Corbett has lectured on geopolitics at the University of Groningen’s Studium Generale, and delivered presentations on open source journalism at The French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation’s fOSSa conference, at TedXGroningen and at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto.
He started The Corbett Report website in 2007 as an outlet for independent critical analysis of politics, society, history, and economics.
Since then he has written, recorded and edited thousands of hours of audio and video media for the website, including a podcast and several regular online video series.
James Corbett’s podcast, articles and documentaries are available through corbettreport.com, and you can listen to more of James Delingpole’s podcast here, or follow him on twitter.
Senior military officers at the institution are reportedly demanding that students take the experimental injections on command or else be treated like an enemy in war.
At first, more than 700 cadets resisted, but heavy pressure has reduced that number to less than 100.
The parents of these few remaining resisters fear that their children are going to be abused by their commanding officers for saying no to the jab, so many of them are banding together and hiring legal counsel to protect their kids from this military-led assault on bodily autonomy.
There are roughly 5,000 official cases of people in the United States dying from Chinese Virus injections. Tens of thousands more have become permanently injured.
None of this matters to West Point, though, which is enforcing medical fascism to the extreme.
Any cadet who refuses to reprogram his or her DNA with an injection for Chinese Germs is being forced to wear a mask at all times as punishment, which violates HIPAA provisions for medical privacy.
Young People Have A Zero Percent Chance Of Dying From Covid
Not only do Wuhan Flu shots provide zero protection against infection, as well as spread, but young people of the kind that are enrolled at West Point also have a zero percent chance of dying from covid in the first place.
None of this is about safety or “saving lives,” in other words. It is all about control, and now our own military is doing the controlling by imposing tyranny and persecution against those who refuse to take this mark of the beast medical intervention on command.
The United States is no longer the land of the free, and in its current state is certainly nothing to be proud of or celebrate.
Anyone who even agrees to enroll in the military at all anymore must have some kind of death wish because this is only the start of what the medical fascists have in store for Americans and the rest of the world.
Those who refuse Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” needles will increasingly face persecution at the hands of the medical deep state.
We are already seeing this with some employers that are attempting to make getting injected a condition of employment.
To be clear, this is all a bipartisan effort. Both Democrats and Republicans are pushing Americans to get jabbed using all kinds of tricks and schemes as bait.
Nearly every one of the seven deadly sins, from free donuts (gluttony) to vaccine “lotteries” (greed) is now on the table to convince as many as possible to get injected.
Students, however, often do not have a choice. They are being told, just like they are at West Point, to either get injected or be punished.
Americans need to take a stand and protect our youth from this egregious medical fascism before it is too late.
“Sadly, the military is absolutely lost to the ‘woke’ cancel culture,” wrote one commenter at CD Media.
“This vaccine tyranny is just another reminder that Americans have lost the protection of the Constitution.”
“My son-in-law (U.S. Army) has been told by base leaders that there are no passes or leave granted for those not vaccinated,” wrote another. “Other army commanders have reportedly prevented unvaccinated from using chow halls and gyms.”