WHY WOMEN SHOULD ONLY TEACH BIBLICAL WOMANHOOD

My conviction that women shouldn’t be teaching women doctrines other than the doctrine of biblical womanhood, as commanded in Titus 2:3-5, has given me a lot of criticism from many places. I am even being called dangerous, legalistic, ungodly, and a false teacher.

Women’s Bible studies are the pathway that has led to many female preachers/pastors, women speaking in the churches, and lukewarm churches. If women can preach/teach Scripture in a church, how is this any different than the men who do this on Sunday mornings?

Yes, women can share Bible verses that encourage and convict them with others. Yes, they can listen to a sermon by John MacArthur or another great male preacher and share what they learned from it. I use a lot of Scripture to support what I teach in biblical womanhood. I also use a lot of Scripture to encourage women in being godly women, but I don’t teach verse-by-verse from the Bible in a church and expound deeply into what they mean. God has clearly ordained men who are biblically qualified to do this. I am not.

If women are to be silent in the churches with all subjection (1 Timothy 2:11) and not teach nor be in authority over men because Eve was deceived (1 Timothy 2:14), what gives them the authority to teach Scripture and sermons to women in the churches? I can’t find any verse that supports this.

If you don’t agree with me, that’s okay. I am only sharing my convictions with you. I don’t see how any of this is dangerous, legalistic, or makes me ungodly and a false teacher though. I love truth. I love searching God’s Word for His perfect will. If you come to different convictions than I do, that’s fine! I am not God. I don’t know everything, but I would rather error on the side of taking the Bible too literally rather than too liberally.

The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.
Titus 2:3-5

***Please listen to Dale Partridge teach on this important topic.

https://thetransformedwife.com/why-women-should-only-teach-biblical-womanhood/

LIVING A LIFE OF SIMPLICITY AND CONTENTMENT

Recently, I shared a picture of my kitchen on my social media. I shared it because of the sun streaming through my windows in the late afternoons as the days grow longer thus showing every fingerprint, all of the dust, dirty cupboards, and making every imperfection clearly visible. It caused me to deep clean it all. Spring seems the time to deep clean and maybe this is why! The sun shows us that our homes need it.

Invariably, one woman made an unkind comment on this post. “That beautiful, big kitchen from only the husband’s income? without you needing to work???” I decided to ignore it as I do many of these kinds of comments. Later, one woman responded to her in this way: “You don’t know how much her husband makes. You don’t know if she saved and saved and saved to be able to afford this kitchen. If you zoom into the kitchen, you can clearly see that her refrigerator is white. It’s an older model too. Her microwave is white. If she was an extravagant spender, she would have stainless steel or one of the other popular finishes.”

I thanked her! I have never been into extravagant living. Most of the furniture in my home is hand-me-downs from my parents or bought from Craigslist which is used furniture. We keep all of our appliances until they are broken and unfixable. Our microwave is 25 years old. Our fridge and ovens are old too. The ovens came with the house so they’re 25 years old too but work great! We had to replace the dishwasher several years ago since it was broken. Instead of completely replacing our wood cabinets, we painted them since we didn’t want to live without a kitchen for weeks and the cost was high to replace. We bought new countertops years ago since the old ones had cracked. I put in wood floors when we bought this house since I love wood floors and they last for many years. We haven’t had to do anything to them yet!

I love for my home to be uncluttered, tidy, and comfortable. These are my priority. I don’t care about having the newest and best of anything. I don’t care about having a model home. I am not saying any of this is wrong unless it causes you to go into debt or your husband doesn’t like you spending so much money. It’s just the way I have chosen to live. I strive to be content and if you have a roof over your head, food in your belly, and clothes on your back, you are to be content (1 Timothy 6:8). Most of us have far more than this! We have much to be thankful for.

I love my home. I am thankful for it. I am thankful that I have a husband who has worked hard to provide for me. I am a homebody and spend a lot of time in my home. I have no desire to travel or be away from it. I love having my grandchildren and others over to my home. Our homes are blessings from the Lord! It’s the joy, love, and peace that make a house a home, not extravagance or a bunch of stuff. Focus on what’s important.

But godliness with contentment is great gain.
1 Timothy 6:6

https://thetransformedwife.com/living-a-life-of-simplicity-and-contentment/

MEN, MARRY VIRGINS SINCE THE RISK OF DIVORCE PLUMMETS

“Wolfinger found a strong correlation among the three cohorts: women who married as virgins had the lowest divorce rates by far. In the 1980s, 11 percent of virgin marriages (on the women’s part) ended in divorce within five years. This decreased to eight percent in the 1990s, and then fell again to six percent in the 2000s. Similarly, women with the second lowest five-year divorce rates are those who had only one partner prior to marriage.” (source)

A woman who has the twitter handle of @GiaMMacool tweeted this recently: “Women release large quantities of oxytocin during sex. Oxytocin is unofficially called the ‘love hormone.’ It emotionally bonds you to your partner. This is why a woman’s body count matters. Pair bonding loses its meaning when you’ve bonded with several men.”

My husband is my one and only. We have been married over 42 years. Even when we were going through a rough time in our marriage, I never once entertained the thought of sexual intimacy with anyone else. I was absolutely bonded to him. I have never had any desire for anyone else. This is the perfect will of God. One man and one woman for life. Keep the marriage bed undefiled even before marriage!

This explains why up to 80 percent of women are the ones initiating divorce. I suspect many of them weren’t virgins when they married. Everything in our highly sexualized culture is persuading them to give themselves away to boyfriends. Dating and fornication set women up for divorce. Once married, they are unable to bond with their husbands as God intends them to do. We weren’t created to have sex with many people. It harms us physically and emotionally.

Many went crazy, even Christians, when I published my post Men Prefer Debt Free Virgins Without Tattoos. Well, all of this explains exactly why men who understand all of this would want a virgin to marry. The risk of their wives divorcing them is small. Teach your daughters and sons truth. Let them know the consequences of fornication. The sexual purity movement did this and now, many women claim it hurt them. No, fornication hurt them just as God’s Word clearly warns us.

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
1 Corinthians 6:18

https://thetransformedwife.com/men-marry-virgins-since-the-risk-of-divorce-plummets/

DOES TEACHERS OF “GOOD THINGS” MEAN WOMEN CAN PREACH TO WOMEN ANYTHING THEY WANT?

“The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things” (Titus 2:3). Many women these days will use the phrase in this verse “good things” to mean that they are able to teach any doctrines in God’s Word to other women. Is this what is meant? I searched the old commentaries to see what they had to say about it.

“Teachers of good things.–Or, teachers of what is good. Beza’s rendering, ‘mistresses of honour’, is singular and expressive. This does not mean that these aged women should occupy the place of public instructresses, but that they should, by here and there speaking a kind warning word, and, better still, by the golden silence of a useful honoured life, teach their younger sisters lessons of truth and faith and love.” (Ellicot’s Commentary)

“Teachers of good things; both by example and by instruction, but in their own houses privately; for they were not suffered to teach publicly, or to speak in the church; these should be teachers, not of old wives’ fables, of superstitious customs, rites, and ceremonies, of the intrigues of love, and of things filthy and obscene, which are too often handed down to posterity by such persons; but of things that are solid and substantial, useful and improving, honest and honourable, chaste and pure.” (Gill’s Exposition)

Many fail to understand this verse: “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence” (1 Timothy 2:12). Many seem to believe it means that women can’t teach men nor be in authority over men in the churches. I believe it means that women can’t teach in the churches period even to women. It’s the men who are called to teach sound doctrine to the congregation which includes men and women.

Gill’s Exposition on this verse: “But I suffer not a woman to teach, They may teach in private, in their own houses and families; they are to be teachers of good things, Titus 2:3. They are to bring up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord; nor is the law or doctrine of a mother to be forsaken, any more than the instruction of a father; see Proverbs 1:8. Timothy, no doubt, received much advantage, from the private teachings and instructions of his mother Eunice, and grandmother Lois; but then women are not to teach in the church; for that is an act of power and authority, and supposes the persons that teach to be of a superior degree, and in a superior office, and to have superior abilities to those who are taught by them.”

Once women decided that the “good things” they are to teach to other women means they can teach all of God’s Word, female preachers exploded. They falsely believe they are teaching “good things” without teaching what God commands that they teach, namely being sober, loving and obeying their husbands, loving their children, being discreet, chaste, good, and keepers at home.

Now, some women will even use the word “good” in Titus 2:5 to say they can teach other women theology. Is this what it means?

“Good.—Gracious, kind, thoughtful to others, especially to inferiors.” (Ellicot’s Commentary)

“Good – In all respects, and in all relations. To a wife, a mother, a sister, there can be no higher characteristic ascribed, than to say that she is good. What other trait of mind will enable her better to perform her appropriate duties of life? What other will make her more like her Saviour?” (Barnes’ Notes on the Bible)

“Good—kind, beneficent (Matthew 20:15; Romans 5:7; 1Peter 2:18). Not churlish and stubborn, but thrifty as housewives.” (Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary)

I can’t find any commentary that tells us that the “good things” and “good” means that this gives women free license to preach the Word to women in the churches as the elders and pastors are commanded to do.

“Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.” (2 Timothy 2:1,2) Paul is clearly saying that faithful men are the ones called to preach and teach the Word of God to others. There’s no question about it. Godly, older women are commanded to teach the young women biblical womanhood as clearly stated in Titus 2:3-5.

Some will say that I am disobeying God’s commands since I am writing in “public spaces” on my social media, my books, and my blog. I believe the authors of these commentaries meant that women weren’t to leave their homes on a regular basis and even travel away from their homes as many female Bible preachers and teachers do. This ministry has been given to men. God commands women to be keepers at home, and this would take them away from their homes. Our ministry needs to revolve in and around our homes to our families. Women can’t be their husbands’ help meet if they are away from home often nor can they mother their own children.

Women aren’t being taught biblical womanhood from the aged women in the churches. This definitely is the ideal! Women need godly, older women in their lives speaking truth to them but few can find these older women which is tragic. I began my ministry teaching other women in their homes and in my home. It’s the only place I have ever taught women.

Now, I am still teaching women from my home. I don’t teach in a church or anywhere else. I am a keeper of my home. I teach what God commands that I teach to women. I am thankful He has given me the opportunity to do this online since my health is not stable. Even if I were healthy, I would never feel comfortable getting behind a pulpit and preaching to women in a church, even if it was biblical womanhood. I receive many personal messages from women and am able to counsel them individually which has been a huge blessing to me. I will continue to do this until I am no longer able to do so or as the Lord wills.

***Here are the Biblical Womanhood books that I highly recommend!

https://thetransformedwife.com/teachers-of-good-things-mean-women-can-preach-to-women-anything-they-want/

NO SMARTPHONES, TVS, OR SLEEPOVERS FOR THEIR FAMILY

There’s a family, Katie and Elisha, who have twelve things they have decided to not do as a family. They both come from godly families whose parents were intentional about raising their children in the ways of the Lord. They are very admirable and will probably challenge many of you in the way you raise your children. Some of these things your husband will disagree with. That’s okay. Submit to your husband’s desires.

Both parents don’t have smartphones. They are so addictive. They decided they wanted to be present for each other and their children. We didn’t have smartphones when raising our children and did just fine without them. I am thankful we didn’t since it’s hard to stay off of them. They’re just another thing to distract us from real life.

The don’t allow their children to go to friends’ homes or sleepovers. This is a great one! We didn’t allow sleepovers either. We wanted our children under our roof at night when they slept. I asked women on my Instagram when they were first exposed to porn. Many of them said it was at someone else’s home. Even many of those who call themselves Christians don’t faithfully guard what comes into their homes. I also agree with them about not allowing their children to go to friends’ homes. We let our children go to some of their friend’s homes who we knew were Christians. Pornography wasn’t so pervasive back then and there were no smartphones. It’s completely different now.

They only use one car. They want to be home but they do live in walking distances to parks and coffee shops. I am a homebody. I am perfectly happy at home. Children love familiarity and routines. This doesn’t happen if you’re always running here and there. This probably isn’t practical for some of you but for those of you who can live with only one car, it’s a great idea especially for those of you who are looking to come home and save money. You will save a lot of money by having only one car!

They don’t have battery operated toys. They’re too loud and stimulating. We have had a few, and I am always thankful when the battery stops working and there is peace. We didn’t give our children a lot of toys. Children don’t need many. I don’t have many at my home even now. When my grandchildren come here, we spend most of our time outside. They scooter, dig around, pick flowers, play with balls, run around, and simply enjoy the outside. Inside, they do puzzles, color, play creatively, or I read to them. We do have some blocks and a few other toys.

The have no TVs, iPads, or tablets.They do have laptops for the parents but only use them for an hour at night. So their children are never sitting in front of screens. This is far heathier for them. There isn’t much worth watching anyways. We weren’t created to stare at screens all day long. Children develop creativity and imagination by playing. My children would often put on plays for us. Don’t stifle their imaginations by sitting them in front of screens. Let them move, play, and even work as God created them to do.

Their children aren’t allowed to wear graphic sparkly T-shirts or clothing. I forgot exactly why they do this. (The video is linked above if you want to watch to it.) Most of them advertise Disney movies which I am not a fan of. We are also called to be modest and shamefaced, not draw attention to ourselves. This is a good way to teach your children from a young age.

Their children don’t go to children’s church. They want their family to worship together from the time they are young. Our church has a nursery for those who are two or under but they too want families worshiping together. You should see the little children and how quiet they are for an hour and a half service! This is good discipline to learn and even though they may not completely understand everything, they are learning great theology at our church from a young age.

They have no Internet use on Saturdays. This is a great idea! Stay away from all of the news and everything else for an entire day so you can simply be present with your family.

They have no individualized sports.They interfere with dinners and church. They have family sports instead. They play volleyball and go skiing. These team sports do cost a lot and take children away from their homes and even churches often. Our sons were in team sports and loved them. Thankfully, few games were ever played on Sundays but they did take a lot of time. This would be a blessing of a big family. You have your own sport’s teams!

The children have no kid foods or prepackaged snacks. They only eat fruits and vegetables for snacks. It’s far better for your health, weight, and gut to learn not to snack at all but for children, only eating fruits and vegetables is a great idea because they will then enjoy their meals and eat heartily. Training them to have good eating habits from a young age is a gift that you give them.

There is no eating after dinner. Eating after dinner sabotages one’s health and sleep. This is so true! We don’t need to eat nearly as often or as much as most of us do. Disciplining our bodies is a good thing to practice. Overeating is harmful to our health. Food doesn’t digest well when we are sleeping so eating dinner a few hours before bedtime is a great idea, then no snacking.

They have minimal evening commitments. They want family dinners. They want to be able to communicate around the table. Evening commitments take away from this precious family time. Family dinners are a wonderful thing. They definitely bond families together.

The young mother in the video, Katie, has a mother who raised many children in the same way. None of her children feel like they missed out on anything. They are all walking in truth. She’s a great one to learn from! She’s joyful and makes her home a happy place. Children feel secure when their parents have convictions that they know are for their good and protection.

I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.
1 Corinthians 9:26, 27

https://thetransformedwife.com/no-smartphones-tvs-or-sleepovers-for-their-family/

NO SMARTPHONES, TVS, OR SLEEPOVERS FOR THEIR FAMILY

There’s a family, Katie and Elisha, who have twelve things they have decided to not do as a family. They both come from godly families whose parents were intentional about raising their children in the ways of the Lord. They are very admirable and will probably challenge many of you in the way you raise your children. Some of these things your husband will disagree with. That’s okay. Submit to your husband’s desires.

Both parents don’t have smartphones. They are so addictive. They decided they wanted to be present for each other and their children. We didn’t have smartphones when raising our children and did just fine without them. I am thankful we didn’t since it’s hard to stay off of them. They’re just another thing to distract us from real life.

The don’t allow their children to go to friends’ homes or sleepovers. This is a great one! We didn’t allow sleepovers either. We wanted our children under our roof at night when they slept. I asked women on my Instagram when they were first exposed to porn. Many of them said it was at someone else’s home. Even many of those who call themselves Christians don’t faithfully guard what comes into their homes. I also agree with them about not allowing their children to go to friends’ homes. We let our children go to some of their friend’s homes who we knew were Christians. Pornography wasn’t so pervasive back then and there were no smartphones. It’s completely different now.

They only use one car. They want to be home but they do live in walking distances to parks and coffee shops. I am a homebody. I am perfectly happy at home. Children love familiarity and routines. This doesn’t happen if you’re always running here and there. This probably isn’t practical for some of you but for those of you who can live with only one car, it’s a great idea especially for those of you who are looking to come home and save money. You will save a lot of money by having only one car!

They don’t have battery operated toys. They’re too loud and stimulating. We have had a few, and I am always thankful when the battery stops working and there is peace. We didn’t give our children a lot of toys. Children don’t need many. I don’t have many at my home even now. When my grandchildren come here, we spend most of our time outside. They scooter, dig around, pick flowers, play with balls, run around, and simply enjoy the outside. Inside, they do puzzles, color, play creatively, or I read to them. We do have some blocks and a few other toys.

The have no TVs, iPads, or tablets.They do have laptops for the parents but only use them for an hour at night. So their children are never sitting in front of screens. This is far heathier for them. There isn’t much worth watching anyways. We weren’t created to stare at screens all day long. Children develop creativity and imagination by playing. My children would often put on plays for us. Don’t stifle their imaginations by sitting them in front of screens. Let them move, play, and even work as God created them to do.

Their children aren’t allowed to wear graphic sparkly T-shirts or clothing. I forgot exactly why they do this. (The video is linked above if you want to watch to it.) Most of them advertise Disney movies which I am not a fan of. We are also called to be modest and shamefaced, not draw attention to ourselves. This is a good way to teach your children from a young age.

Their children don’t go to children’s church. They want their family to worship together from the time they are young. Our church has a nursery for those who are two or under but they too want families worshiping together. You should see the little children and how quiet they are for an hour and a half service! This is good discipline to learn and even though they may not completely understand everything, they are learning great theology at our church from a young age.

They have no Internet use on Saturdays. This is a great idea! Stay away from all of the news and everything else for an entire day so you can simply be present with your family.

They have no individualized sports.They interfere with dinners and church. They have family sports instead. They play volleyball and go skiing. These team sports do cost a lot and take children away from their homes and even churches often. Our sons were in team sports and loved them. Thankfully, few games were ever played on Sundays but they did take a lot of time. This would be a blessing of a big family. You have your own sport’s teams!

The children have no kid foods or prepackaged snacks. They only eat fruits and vegetables for snacks. It’s far better for your health, weight, and gut to learn not to snack at all but for children, only eating fruits and vegetables is a great idea because they will then enjoy their meals and eat heartily. Training them to have good eating habits from a young age is a gift that you give them.

There is no eating after dinner. Eating after dinner sabotages one’s health and sleep. This is so true! We don’t need to eat nearly as often or as much as most of us do. Disciplining our bodies is a good thing to practice. Overeating is harmful to our health. Food doesn’t digest well when we are sleeping so eating dinner a few hours before bedtime is a great idea, then no snacking.

They have minimal evening commitments. They want family dinners. They want to be able to communicate around the table. Evening commitments take away from this precious family time. Family dinners are a wonderful thing. They definitely bond families together.

The young mother in the video, Katie, has a mother who raised many children in the same way. None of her children feel like they missed out on anything. They are all walking in truth. She’s a great one to learn from! She’s joyful and makes her home a happy place. Children feel secure when their parents have convictions that they know are for their good and protection.

I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.
1 Corinthians 9:26, 27

https://thetransformedwife.com/no-smartphones-tvs-or-sleepovers-for-their-family/

HER LIFE AT HOME PAYS FOR ITSELF

This comment is from Kelly Anne Mabee in response to something I wrote on Facebook. Many women seem to want me to STOP teaching women to be keepers at home since either they don’t want to be home or they can’t. Many wrote that families simply can’t make it on one income. I tried to reason with them and gave all of the reasons why I won’t stop. This comment stood out as amazing to me. I hope it blesses you too!

Please keep teaching us WOMEN. You have been an amazing resource in my life personally, and I pray that for many, many others as well. As far as staying  home as a help meet, keeping home, and being with my babies, raising them instead of dropping them off at daycare, family, or friends, I have come to realize WE DO NOT “NEED” TWO INCOMES. God has blessed us and taken care of us after “we” made the decision that I would stay home so we fully put our trust in Him.

Staying home means we don’t pay for:

Rushed mornings waking up super early to get myself and the kids ready, and the daily stressors involved with all of that.

Fuel to get to daycare provider, family, or friends.

Fuel to then get to work.

Spending all day away from my children.

Fuel to get from work back to the daycare provider.

Fuel to get home.

The actual cost of daycare.

The actual cost of the stress of rushing and constantly being on the go.

When I get off work late, there’s a lot of traffic or I am too tired to make dinner then there is a cost of fuel to go to a place to buy dinner and the actual cost of the dinner itself. Not made with love, not healthy. Not affordable.

The cost of not being able to plan meals.

Not planning shopping around the best sales, comparing prices, and spending OUR money wisely.

The actual stress of not being with my children and keeping the home for them or my husband: laundry piling up, counters messy, couches messy, and kids’ rooms messy.

The cost of my relationship with my husband because God’s Word is not followed.

The cost of my relationship with my kids because they are gone, I am gone, and I am simply too tired and need “me time” away from them.

Not having the time to teach the importance of God’s word and how to obey Him or us.

The taxes they would take out of my paycheck.

I could go on and on and on about all the things we no longer financially pay for, and the things we no longer emotionally pay for.

All of that, not having to pay for all of those things, has made MY JOB AT HOME PAY FOR ITSELF.

And above all of that, I’m honoring God and what He has commanded of me as a woman. So that pays.

I hope other women come to reverence God as well. TRUST IN GOD. When you obey His Word, He will provide a way.

💜

Thank you  Please keep sharing.

Please keep encouraging.

Please keep teaching WOMEN.

We need it.

But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
Matthew 19:26

https://thetransformedwife.com/her-life-at-home-pays-for-itself/

WHAT DOES NOT DEPRIVING ONE’S HUSBAND ENTAIL?

Recently, Mountain Housewife tweeted this which caused quite a controversy. “Dear married ladies, your approach to sex should be ‘whatever, whenever, and wherever.’ Then watch your marriage and life thrive.”

I then responded to her tweet on my timeline: “Do you agree with her? I love her and she gives great marital advice but I would never give this advice since some men enjoy sex that can be harmful (anal sex, for instance). Some young mothers could never fulfill the whenever and wherever. Many are not married to godly men. God commands us not to deprive our husbands. He doesn’t command we do it whenever, whatever, and wherever. This counsel could place a heavy burden on women.”

Mountain Housewife then tweeted this a few days later: “As I read through the replies to this tweet, I see so many excuses and outright hostility. I’ve even had some death threats. All I’m saying ladies is to do your best for the man you love and make his sexual delight your priority. And stay in the Word of God and prayer.” I agreed with her here wholeheartedly!

Yesterday, a woman asked me to clarify what we both mean when we teach women to not deprive husbands sexually after a man tweeted that husbands can take sex from their wives any time they want. He claims that this teaches them submission. This woman felt that the teaching of not depriving one’s husband sexually results in this type of wrong behavior from men.

There’s other young women who wish Mountain Housewife and I would simply not teach about sex at all since this is personal. Yet, we are commanded to teach young women to love their husbands (Titus 2:4). One of the greatest ways a husband feels loved is by having a wife who doesn’t deprive him sexually. Before marriage, most women never deprive their boyfriends since their boyfriends would leave them if they did but for some reason are fine with depriving their husbands whenever they want because they’re married. Young women NEED to be taught these things! Marriages are being destroyed over this issue.

In this post, I am going to attempt to explain what not depriving one’s husband entails. I have pondered this a lot and even asked the Lord for wisdom. It’s not an easy topic to write on in this highly sexualized, corrupted culture where women are offended so easily and yell, “Marital rape!” when this is taught.

Here’s is what God’s Word has to say about this topic from the KJV:

“Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.” (1 Corinthians 7:3-5)

Defraud means “To withhold wrongfully from another what is due to him.” Once married, women must not withhold sexual intimacy from their husbands. This is a command from God. Our bodies are not our own. We become one flesh and are to give ourselves to each other freely.

Does this mean a wife should give herself to her husband whenever, wherever, and whatever? No, just as a wife submitting to her husband in everything as God commands doesn’t include submitting to any sin against God. We always obey God rather than man which includes our husband. Then there is also common sense which God gave to us.

Anal sex is prevalent in today’s pornographic culture. There is debate about whether it is a sin or not. I believe it is since it’s incredibly harmful and destructive. The anus wasn’t created for sex. It’s not a sexual organ. Anal sex is especially harmful for women. Therefore, I do not believe women need to submit to their husbands in this or any act that they feel degraded or is harmful to them in any way. From Scripture, it seems to be that the sex act should be mutually enjoyed by both husband and wife. This takes time to figure out but it can be done!

Can a wife ever say “no” to her husband? If a wife is freely giving her husband sexual intimacy and her husband knows without a doubt that his wife has good will towards him and wants to please him, then there’s no problems with saying “no” once in awhile because a wife is too tired, not feeling well, or recovering from childbirth, although there are creative ways to satisfy one’s husband without intercourse in the six weeks after childbirth. As long as your husband is loved by you, he will most likely be benevolent to you in this area; for we reap what we sow.

However, there are far too many women who decide when and if they will have sex with their husbands. It’s always on their timetable and when they feel like it. Do we have to always be in the mood to be intimate with our husbands? NO! God’s commands have nothing to do with our feelings. We are to obey Him regardless of our feelings. If your feelings are not to have sex with your husband, change your feelings! Learn to be led by obedience and truth rather than your feelings.

Does this give husbands license to force themselves upon their wives as some claim? No, and why would a husband even want to force himself upon a wife who he knows loves him and desires to please him? Yes, there are some cruel husbands who physically abuse their wives and will force themselves upon them. This is wrong. Any woman who is in an abusive marriage like this needs to seek a way of escape as soon as possible. She should even get the police involved.

The vast majority of husbands, however, are not forcing themselves upon their wives although I am sure that some of them who are being continually deprived by their wives sure feel like it. This is absolutely an affliction for these husbands. They married because they burned sexually. God commands that if they burn, they should marry so they did. Once married, their wives have little interest in pleasing them in this area. These wives are living in sin and are tearing their homes down with their own hands. They need to repent and begin loving their husbands.

Become godly wives who love the Lord and His ways. Learn to love your husband and please him sexually. It will not only bless your husband but it will bless you too. There are abundant blessings in living in obedience to the Lord.

Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.
Proverbs 5:19

***Here’s a post for wives who are being deprived by their husbands sexually.

https://thetransformedwife.com/what-does-not-depriving-ones-husband-entail/

Obscuring the Jewish Issue in Media #3 — PragerU

Dennis Prager. Credit: Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

In Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, we examined the ways in which Jewish media companies censor and suppress online views of the covid phenomenon and vaccine issue as presented by natural health doctor Joseph Mercola and Children’s Health Defense, and the way in which online journal Global Researchmanaged to hide the fact that seven of the eight banking dynasty families that founded the Federal Reserve were not only Jewish, but also almost thoroughly intermarried into one all-powerful Jewish banking clan

PragerU on Slavery

Now we will look at a video documentary released by PragerU, featuring the Black conservative Republican Party spokeswoman Candace Owens. I was interested to see this bit of what appears to be reverse propaganda, since it was titled “A Short History of Slavery.” This was first released in August 2021 when we had much worse to contend with, as the covid vaccine roll-out accelerated across the nation, to some extent under compulsion. Yet we always have the issue of racism to contend with in our post-Civil Rights era, and Candace was going to set us all straight. Her video currently has 3.3 million views.

Slavery didn’t start in 1492 when Columbus came to the New World. And it didn’t start in 1619 when the first slaves landed in Jamestown. It’s not a White phenomenon. The real story of slavery is long and complex. Candace Owens explains.

I found the knowledge (as far as it went) conveyed an excellent counter-point to the “woke” liberal narratives on the complex story of slavery. Such simplistic story-telling as 1619 as the beginning of slavery in America, and Columbus the first White man to enslave Caribbean islanders are thoroughly debunked by Owens, who explains that slavery is many thousands of years older than that—going back to the foundations of civilization 6000 years ago—and that Caribbean islanders were busy enslaving each other long before Columbus arrived. (In a strange development, Owens herself lists her “ethnicity” as Caribbean, as we will see.) Owens does not only extend slavery to all other races beyond Whites, but even praises White people as the only ones who ever officially ended slavery—for moral reasons (here, Chap. 7), and even notes that Whites have been victims of slavers, such as Muslim Arabs.

Jews Were the Slavers

The reason this otherwise honest depiction of slavery is a form of limited hangout (revealing part of the truth in order to forestall a search for further truths) is that it obscures the Jewish Issue. The best honest history of the Jewish role in the Transatlantic slave trade comes from the first volume of The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews (using the Yandex search engine, I got a hit for Archive.org, but it said no longer available due to violation of terms of use) by the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam (Black Muslims in America). In a synchronicity, a subscriber to my Substack site Taboo Truth recently sent me an over four hour video documentary titled You Are Amalek — The Hidden War Against The European Bloodlines. It contains a sermon by Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, referring to the Secret Relationship book he holds in his hand, and then a display of the many advertisements for the sale of Blacks by Jews presented in the book.

Columbus a Jew?

Today we see a surprising (or not) number of mainstream official sources questioning whether Columbus was a Jew. Many of them are Jewish sources, such as The Times of IsraelMy Jewish Learning, and Jewish Telegraphic AgencyTo the extent that CNN and HuffPoare also Jewish—a large extent—the view that Columbus was Jewish is now official doctrine (but not on Wikipedia, which details other theories). In scanning all these sources, it appears Jews are claiming Columbus for their own in the same way they claim great scientists such as Einstein and Oppenheimer to boost Jewish pride and trick the Goyim into thinking Jews are responsible for great advances in Western culture. Owens does something similar in the documentary “A Short History of Slavery,” without identifying Columbus as Jewish. Essentially she exonerates him as a slaver by indicating that the Caribbean islander tribes were already enslaving each other before Columbus arrived. We can speculate that PragerU was not ready to out Columbus as a Jew as yet, still focused on White-washing him and all other Whites of the exclusive sin of slavery.

The PragerU Story

What of PragerU itself? It defines itself in this way:

We promote American values through the creative use of educational videos that reach millions of people online. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, Prager University Foundation (“PragerU”) offers a free alternative to the dominant left-wing ideology in culture, media, and education. Whether you’re searching for a deeper understanding, a new perspective, or a way to get involved, PragerU helps people of all ages think and live better.

To learn “The PragerU Story” and “How It All Started” see the documentary “celebrating PragerU’s first 10 years in the mind-changing business. Don’t miss it!” (emphasis added). I would not dream of missing this informative presentation on the PragerU story, so I watched all sixteen minutes of it. It begins with a brief profile of the narrator, Amala Ekpunobi, a young at least part-Black woman with long Black braids. Yes, then we learn that her father was a “Nigerian immigrant” and her mother a White American. Amala’s mother was in tears of joy when Obama was elected, which taught Amala that “skin color was important.”

After a mercifully brief rap dance by Amala, we come to the actual origins of PragerU in the persons of Dennis Prager and Allen Estrin. After displaying the development of PragerU as a successful online educational platform, we come back to another brief rap dance by Amala, then Estrin says “When people hear the truth, they start to wonder about everything they’ve been told.” It claims to have all the right enemies, including “big tech” which censors PragerU online. Dennis Prager equates a United States under censorship to the Soviet Union, and we see a headline flash: “Starving Ukraine,” (11:36) obviously referring to the Holodomor. The video even quotes Stalin saying “Utter destruction to the German invaders!” (11:21) a reference to Operation Barbarossa that began the war in the East.

Then Marissa Streit, the pretty blondish apparently White woman, CEO of PragerU, says “I think the story of Amala Ekpunobi is the story of many Americans.” Depicting the mulatto Ekpunobi as representative of “many Americans” is all part of PragerU’s “mind-changing business.” Since those most engaged in the “mind-changing business” are invariably Jews, I went searching to confirm that at least Dennis Prager and Allen Estrin are Jews. Radio Islam shows a long list under “Who Controls Millenial/Modern News?” and their racial heritage. Under PragerU, all three, including Streit, are listed as Jewish!

Marissa Streit, Prager CEO and Mossad Agent

I doubted that Streit is Jewish and so searched further. Her biography page at PragerUstates she “was born in Los Angeles and moved to Israel at a young age, where she completed her primary education and served in military intelligence unit 8200 of the Israel Defense Forces.” Unit 8200 is notorious as the Mossad’s cyber-intelligence department in charge of digital spying, censorship, private tech start-up affiliates, information hacking and other digital warfare, including especially in the U.S. The Israeli Unit 8200 agent Marissa Streit is CEO of PragerU.

Allen Estrin is Jewish

Estrin is harder to confirm. The only clue on his PragerU biography is that he “directed the highly-praised documentary, ‘Israel in a Time of Terror,’ 2002.” The Wikipedia entry on Estrin provides some more clues.

In 2002, Estrin was denied life insurance because he traveled to Israel, one of the countries subject to U.S. State Department travel advisories. Because of this, he sued 14 insurance companies. This led to some insurers changing such policies, and to a bill in California to outlaw such travel restrictions on policies.

A Jew is most likely to respond to a denial of life insurance with this kind of lawfare, especially if it involved beloved Israel.

Also, Jewish Journal published a brief review of Estrin’s and co-author Rabbi Joseph Telushkin’s 2004 book Heaven’s Witness, a murder mystery that incorporates a theme of the afterlife. What business two Jews have writing a novel referring to heaven is the real mystery, until we read in the Jewish Journal review: “The book… is peppered with talmudic and biblical axioms…” As for Estrin’s co-author, “Rabbi Joseph Telushkin has done his part to keep the Jewish people, well, literate, by publishing such erudite tomes as ‘Biblical Literacy’ (William Morrow, 1997) and ‘Jewish Literacy’ (William Morrow, 1991).” Is there any point in checking if William Morrow is dominated by Jews? We should be willing to confirm Estrin as Jewish given these references.

Dennis Prager So Jewish

Dennis Prager is openly Jewish. He “was raised in an orthodox Jewish home” in Brooklyn, attended a Yeshiva there, where he even befriended Estrin’s future co-author and future Rabbi Telushkin. A short Google entry on Prager (p. 402–3) labels him a “Jewish talk show host and author,” “who has often interpreted Judaism for a wider audience.”

His books The Nine Questions People Ask About Judaism (1976) and Why the Jews? The Reason for Antisemitism (1983) surely do not deal with issues like whether Jews committed ritual murder of children, or whether Jewish behavior toward Gentiles generates antisemitism. Nine Questions became a best-seller and “popular in all the major American Jewish movements.” Question #3 is “If Judaism is supposed to make people better, how do you account for unethical religious Jews?”. I haven’t read the answer, but I would bet some serious money it is not that Jews have a racial proclivity and cultural training toward unethical behavior. Question #8, “Why shouldn’t I intermarry?” reveals Jewish racial separatism, supremacism and bigotry, while powerful Jews today promote White race mixing.

Why the Jews? attributes antisemitism to Gentile dislike for the quirky Jewish religion.

The authors find the root of anti-Semitism not in racism, xenophobia, the need for scapegoats, economic depressions, or any other universalizing factor. The occasion for the hatred of Jews they find in Judaism itself.

Prager and co-author Rabbi Telushkin state: “the Jew carries the burden of God in history and for this has never been forgiven.” Definitely a positive spin.

The following account of Prager’s Jewishness is summarized from the Google entry on Prager(p. 402–3): In the same year as his first book publication, Prager became Director of the Brandeis Institute, and brought in Telushkin as education director. “During his tenure [Prager] succeeded in influencing many young Jews.” For ten years Prager hosted a TV talk show on KABC discussing “religion,” and wrote a syndicated column for newspapers nation-wide. By 1986 he divorced his wife, nee Goldstein, and suffered a mental breakdown. Soon after Jewish-controlled President Reagan appointed Prager as U.S. delegate to the Vienna Review Conference on the Helsinki Accords. His weekly show on religion expanded to five hours every Sunday night. Prager’s Judaism then took form in 1992 in his joining the Steven S. Wise Reform Synagogue, and in his continuing education classes taught before hundreds of students at University of Jerusalem. In 1994 he hosted a nation-wide TV talk show. By 2000 Prager switched his show to KRLA, a “conservative Christian group,” but he “often serves as scholar in residence at synagogues throughout the United States.” The entry concludes: “he is considered one of the leading socially conservative Jewish political spokesmen.”

Prager remains thoroughly Jewish since his founding and operation of PragerU, a main component of Jewish control of current right-wing conservatism in the U.S.

Candace Owens, Acting for Jews

In late July 2021, researcher and author Eric Striker published “Rising Republican Party Influencers Got Their Start At Talent Agency Run By Israeli Pornographer” on the National Justice platform. It is essential reading to begin an understanding of Jewish control of conservative politics in the U.S. Striker identifies eight “household names in the world of Republican Party politics as being actors or models” groomed by the named Israeli pornographer.

Number 1 is Candace Owens. “who began producing professional conservative content months after launching her Explore Talent profile in 2017.” Explore Talent is the talent agency of Israeli-born Amiram Moshe Shafrir, who amassed wealth running a phone sex service and a number of online pornography sites. Later Shafrir’s porn customers were shifted into his new online dating sites to pad their numbers, including the Jewish-only site J-Date. Other Jews brought suit against Shafrir and his now ex-wife Sarit, including accusations of wiretapping, blackmail of military personnel, bribing police, credit card fraud and even trafficking of drugs to minors.

This is the man—Shafrir—who went on to found Explore Talent, where Candace Owens was “discovered” as a conservative spokesperson and wound up narrating the PragerU video on “A Short History of Slavery.” According to a Backstage investigation of Explore Talent:

ExploreTalent.com over has 7 million members and is the Internet’s largest resource for talents, with over 40,000 Roles & castings currently active. That is 10–20 times more than any other competing site.

Candace Owen’s “Acting/Modeling Profile” from Explore Talent is preserved on Archive.org. This is where she lists her ethnicity as “Caribbean.” I wonder if she is descended from Quadroons or Octaroons, mixed-race slaves, many likely part-Irish, descending from  Irish slaves in the Caribbean. She has the look. Irish were particularly enslaved on Barbados working the sugar plantations. Owens lists modeling, dance, film acting, music videos and other performing arts for which she is qualified to be hired. Hosting PragerU’s video on slavery is well within her job description.

Lead With the Money

The Daily Dot features an essay titled “PragerU is conservatism for the youth—brought to you by old billionaires,” updated in 2021. It’s subtitle states: “They’re old, they’re rich, and they want you to think just like them.” This source for knowledge on the funding of PragerU commences: “In one short decade, PragerU has become an indoctrination powerhouse.” It goes on to denounce PragerU from every Progressive “woke” perspective, suggesting it is misogynist, racist, Christian crazy, classist, stupid and above all greedy.

Before we are advised of the funding sources, we are offered a short list of “presenters” who are “fresh-faced millennials,” including non-Jews, presumably because PraegerU is basically a mission unto the gentiles. These are Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder, Candace Owens, Will Witt, and Charlie Kirk. Shapiro is of course Jewish, and we know the Jewish influence over Owens. Charlie Kirk’s Wikipedia entry states he is “Evangelical Christian,” which means Christian Zionist. The accomplished commentator on Zionism Brandon Martinez claims “Charlie Kirk Basically Admits That He’s a Jew,” and while Kirk comes close, he essentially identifies himself as a zealous Zionist and philo-Semite. Will Witt is PragerU’s “Man on the Street,” and conducts spontaneous interviews with people, asking them questions probing their knowledge of relevant issues. See his “Who Was Anne Frank?” video, interviewing mostly young Blacks on Hollywood Boulevard about “one of the most important historical figures of all time.” One young Black man answered, “An actor, right?” Witt says “No,” but in fact the interviewee was correct. See the review of the recent book on the subject, “Review of “Unmasking Anne Frank, Her Famous Diary Exposed as a Literary Fraud,” something Witt and PragerU will never read but we all should.

Finally we come to the “old billionaires” who fund PragerU.

The poorest, Michael Leven, has an estimated net worth of $11 million; Lee Roy Mitchell, the next poorest, is worth a quarter-billion dollars. Three—the late Sheldon Adelson and brothers Dan and Farris Wilks—were/are billionaires.

Leven is featured on Amazing Jews as co-founding a Jewish donation program inspired by “his love of the Jewish people and Israel,” in the report “Michael Leven: Visionary Philanthropist Who Co-Founded the Jewish Future Pledge.”

Amazingly, Lee Roy Mitchell was a kingpin in the ownership of movie theaters, founder and CEO for twenty years of Cinemark, but is not Jewish, in an industry overwhelmingly dominated by Jews.

Dan and Farris Wilks’s parents founded their own church in 1947. “The church is not Christian, believing that Yahweh is the only god and that Jesus (whom they call Yahushua) is a separate entity.” By 1982 the church became

…the Assembly of Yahweh (7th day). Currently the Assembly of Yahweh (7th day) is a conservative Jews for Jesus-type congregation. It teaches that “the true religion is Jewish (not a Gentile religion)” and its members celebrate the Old Testament holidays rather than those related to the New Testament.

Farris Wilks “is the current pastor and bishop of the Assembly of Yahweh (7th day) near Cisco” Texas. He and his brother Dan are the epitome of Christian Zionists who worship Jews as Yahweh’s Chosen People and revere Israel above all nations. Their funding essentially identifies PragerU as the most prominent outlet for Christian Zionism allied with Jewish power. The Wilks brothers also funded Jewish conservative presenter Ben Shapiro at the Daily Wire.

Sheldon Adelson was a known Jewish Israel-Firster Zionist and multi-billionaire casino owner who may have connections to organized crime through defrauding his business partners, prostitution at his casinos, and bribery of Chinese officials to establish a casino in Macau. Adelson donated so much money to so many Republican candidates and campaigns, including both Trump campaigns, that he is called “Kingmaker.” He also funded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Milekowsky) campaigns, as “Kingmaker” in Israel. Much more could be explored about Adelson as a devout Zionist and billionaire Jewish media influencer, and in this case as a major funder of PragerU. In 2013 Adelson famously said:

“What I would say is, ‘Listen. You see that desert out there, I want to show you something.’ …You pick up your cellphone and you call somewhere in Nebraska and you say, ‘OK let it go.’ And so there’s an atomic weapon, goes over ballistic missiles, the middle of the desert, that doesn’t hurt a soul. Maybe a couple of rattlesnakes, and scorpions, or whatever. And then you say, ‘See? The next one is in the middle of Tehran.’ So, we mean business.”

Adelson’s death in early 2021 came long after his financial support and content influence upon PragerU.

Of the five major donors and funders to PragerU, two are Jewish, and two are devout Christian Zionists. Rather than follow the money, we must lead with the money to understand PragerU’s objectives in the “mind-changing business.” They are pro-Zionist and pro-Jewish through influence on right-wing conservative U.S. politics. They also help incite the intense political divide as part of the divide/conflict/conquer strategy which a tiny Jewish minority inflicts on the much larger U.S. population to keep it distracted fighting each other rather than identifying its common enemy, the Jewish Power Elite (on both sides of the engineered mainstream political divide).

Conclusion: PragerU is Obscuring the Jewish Issue Bigtime

PragerU appears to be doing good work in distributing educational material counteracting the Left’s “woke” narratives and promoting American conservative patriotism, as exemplified in its “A Short History of Slavery” with young Black conservative spokesperson Candace Owens. A closer examination reveals that the two founders of PragerU, Dennis Prager and Allen Estrin are devout Israel-Firsters and fully self-identified practicing Jews. The CEO they chose to lead PragerU, Marissa Streit, is not only another Israel-Firster and devout Jew, but was trained by the Israeli Mossad’s Unit 8200, known for conducting the most malevolent surveillance, psychological operations, cyber spying and mind control propaganda in the U.S. This alone makes PragerU a key nexus in this culture war and psy-op Jews have long been inflicting on the U.S. population, both left and right.

In essence, PragerU is controlled opposition to the Jewish-controlled left-wing educational media promoting “wokeism” and Progressive views. Neither will notice Jewish power, and both will protect Jewish power from scrutiny. PragerU will participate in the incitement and provocation of right vs. left, driving the political divide deeper in the same way Communist propaganda drove a class divide between bourgeoisie and proletariat, and Neo-Communists drove and still drive a race divide in the U.S.

PragerU uses public actress and performer “Caribbean” Candace Owens as its diversity face for “the story of many Americans,” along with its “Story of PragerU” video, featuring mullato Amala Ekpunobi. This is conservatism that is safe for the Jews. Owens—and many others of the new crop conservative spokespeople—was discovered and groomed by a talent agency owned and operated by a corrupt Jewish Israeli pornographer involved in much greater organized crime, including Blackmailing and bribing police and military personnel and accused of selling drugs to minors.

Verdict: PragerU is convicted of obscuring the Jewish Issue because it is entirely Jewish in its founding and management, largely Jewish and Christian Zionist in its funding, operates from an establishment-friendly right-wing conservative perspective to promote Jewish interests and obliterate any noticing of the Jewish role as the backbone of the woke left in America. Like the Israel Lobby which actively courts support from both Democrats and Republicans, their goal is to ensure that both sides of political debate are safe for Jews.

https://www.unz.com/article/obscuring-the-jewish-issue-in-media-3-prageru/

Feminism Was Created by the US Communist Party

class-struggle.jpg

For newbies, I am reposting this key article, a review of Kate Wiegand’s Red Feminism: Communism and the Making of Women’s Liberation (2002) as a reminder that the  transformation of society in our lifetime was quite literally Communist-inspired. Communism, in turn, was a creation of the Masonic Jewish world banking cartel that controls all other corporate cartels and seeks to impose its satanic tyranny on mankind. The essence of Communism (Cabalism, Freemasonry) is that humans do not have a soul and there is no God (moral order or spiritual purpose in creation.) The Cabalist makes himself God and inverts reality so his material interests and perversions are paramount.   Thus he inducts us into a satanic cult.  There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960’s-1980’s that wasn’t prefigured in the Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA) of the 1940’s and 1950’s. While the CPUSA took their orders from Moscow, Feminism was repressed in the USSR. The Soviets understood its subversive 

character. 

goalsofcommunism.jpg
you-gentiles9.jpg

from Dec.2, 2018

By Henry Makow Ph.D. 

“Rape is an expression of … male supremacy … the age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men.” 


Does this sound like a modern radical feminist? Guess again. It is from an American Communist Party pamphlet from 1948 entitled “Woman Against Myth” by Mary Inman.

redfem.jpg

In a 2002 book, Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women’s Liberation,feminist historian Kate Weigand states: “ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women’s movement of the 1960s and later.”(154)

In fact, Weigand, a lecturer at Smith College, shows that modern feminism is a direct outgrowth of American Communism. There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960’s-1980’s that wasn’t prefigured in the CPUSA of the 1940’s and 1950’s. Many second-wave feminist leaders were “red diaper babies,” the children of Communist Jews.

Communists pioneered the political and cultural analysis of woman’s oppression. They originated “women’s studies,” and advocated public daycare, birth control, abortion and even children’s rights. They forged key feminist concepts such as “the personal is the political” and techniques such as “consciousness raising.”

In the late 1940’s, CPUSA leaders realized that the labor movement was becoming increasingly hostile to Communism. They began to focus on women and African Americans. They hoped “male supremacy” would “bring more women into the organization and into the fight against the domestic policies of the Cold War.” (80)

Communist women who made up 40% of the party wanted more freedom to attend party meetings. After the publication of “Women Against Myth” in 1948, the CPUSA initiated a process of “re-educating” men that we recognize only too well today.

george-marks-man-and-woman-washing-dishes.jpg

For example, in the party newspaper “The Daily Worker” a photo caption of a man with a young child read, “Families are stronger and happier if the father knows how to fix the cereal, tie the bibs and take care of the youngsters.” (127)

The Party ordered men who didn’t take the woman question seriously to complete “control tasks involving study on the woman question.” In 1954 the Los Angeles branch disciplined men for “hogging discussion at club meetings, bypassing women comrades in leadership and making sex jokes degrading to women.” (94)

A film Salt of the Earth, which critic Pauline Kael called “Communist propaganda”, portrayed women taking a decisive role in their husbands’ labor strike. “Against her husband’s wishes, Esperanza became a leader in the strike and for the first time forged a role for herself outside of her household… [her] political successes persuaded Ramon to accept a new model of family life.” (132) Portrayals of strong assertive successful women became as common in the Communist press and schools, as they are in the mass media today.

Communist women formalized a sophisticated Marxist analysis of the “woman question.” The books In Women’s Defense (1940) by Mary Inman, Century of Struggle (1954) by Eleanor Flexner and The Unfinished Revolution(1962) by Eve Merriam recorded women’s oppression and decried sexism in mass culture and language. For example, Mary Inman argued that “manufactured femininity” and “overemphasis on beauty” keep women in subjection (33).

05friedan2_184.jpg

The founder of modern feminism, Betty Frieden, left, relied on these texts when she wrote The Feminine Mystique(1963). These women all hid the fact that they were long-time Communist activists. In 1960, their daughters had everything they needed, including the example of subterfuge, to start the Women’s Liberation Movement.

THE COMMUNIST CHARACTER OF FEMINISM

Feminism’s roots in Marxist Communism explain a great deal about this curious but dangerous movement. It explains:

  • Why the ” woman’s movement” hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like “equality” on a personal, biological and mystical relationship. 
     
  • Why the “women’s movement” also embraces “equality” of race and class.
     
  • Why they want revolution (“transformation”) and have a messianic vision of a gender-less utopia. 
     
  • Why they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion. 
     
  • Why they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism. 
     
  • Why truth for them is a “social construct” defined by whoever has power, and appearances are more important than reality. 
     
  • Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence in favor of their political agenda. 
     
  • Why they refuse to debate, don’t believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views. 
     
  • Why they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard. 
     

It’s hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. Communism is designed to give power to the puppets of central bankers by fostering division and conflict. Divide and Conquer. Having failed to peddle class and race war, Communism promoted gender conflict instead. In each case they fostered a sense of grievance in the target group. Now the traditional feminine role “oppressed” women.

Violence-Against-Women-650x400.jpg

(Left, another Communist psy op.) 

The “diversity” and “multicultural” movements represent Communism’s attempt to empower and use other minorities, gays and “people of color,” to further undermine the majority (European, Christian) culture. Thus, the original CPUSA trio of “race, gender and class” is very much intact but class conflict was never a big seller.

The term “politically correct” originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920’s. Its usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes. The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization and establish a veiled dictatorship called “world government” run by the toadies of the central bankers.

We have seen this destruction in the dismantling of the liberal arts curriculum and tradition of free speech and inquiry at our universities. We have seen this virus spread to government, business, the media and the military. This could only happen because the financial elite, in fact, sponsors Communism.

In Communism, the government is the ultimate monopoly. It controls everything, not just wealth but also power and thought. It is the instrument of monopoly capital (i.e. Rothschild, Rockefeller.) Everybody from the President on down works for them.

A LOCAL EXAMPLE 

“Political correctness” has dulled and regimented our cultural life. In 2002, here in Winnipeg, Betty Granger, a conservative school trustee referred to “the Asian invasion” causing house price increases in Vancouver. Granger was pilloried mercilessly in the press. People sent hate letters and dumped garbage on her lawn.

granger-betty.jpg

At a meeting, the School Board Chairman acknowledged that Granger is not a racist and Asians have married into her family. Nonetheless, Granger was censured because, I quote, “appearances are more important than reality.” This slippage from the mooring of objective truth is the hallmark of Communism.

The atmosphere at the meeting was charged. Mild-mannered Canadians, all champions of “tolerance,” behaved like wild dogs eager to rip apart a trapped rabbit. Betty Granger repented and voted in favor of her own censure.

These rituals of denunciation and contrition, typical of Stalinist Russia or Maoist China, are becoming more common in America. They are like show trials designed to frighten people into conforming. We have “diversity officers” and “human rights commissions” and “sensitivity training” to uphold feminist shibboleths. They talk about “discrimination” but they freely discriminate against Christians, white heterosexual men and traditional women. They use the specter of “sexual harassment” to fetter male-female relations and purge their opponents.

CONCLUSIONIn 1980, three women in Leningrad produced ten typewritten copies of a feminist magazine called Almanac. The KGB shut down the magazine and deported the women to West Germany. In the USSR, feminism has largely been for export. According to Professor Weigand, her “book provides evidence to support the belief that at least some Communists regarded the subversion of the gender system [in America] as an integral part of the larger fight to overturn capitalism.”

In conclusion, the feminist pursuit of “equal rights” is a mask for an invidious Communist agenda. The Communist MO has always been deception, infiltration, and subversion using social justice issues as a pretext. Communism can take any form that empowers the puppets of the central bankers. The goal is the destruction of Western civilization and creation of a new world order run by monopoly capital. This has largely been accomplished.Kate Weigand’s Red Feminismdemonstrates that we live in a de facto Communist society, a development which took place by subterfuge with the complicity of the Masonic central banker-controlled Establishment.

Related:  Feminist Icon was Insane, says her sister

Makow –  What is Communism? 

Watson—– Top Feminist (Jew) Calls for “Collectivist” Revolution

https://www.henrymakow.com