You go about doing your morning browsing of your favorites websites and notice that some won’t load, or makes you perform a captcha, or says it is checking your browser, and it becomes apparent that Internet attacks, including the dreaded DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks, which clog up the system so badly with botnet connections, so real users cannot access the website, are on the rise.
This morning alone, we see that one of our readers couldn’t access Liberty Daily, others could, but another user notices that a different conservative website was blocked for them, and it becomes clear that something is going on.
As a test, we checked as many liberal websites as we could find, and did not get blocked from any of them. That is a very unscientific test because it is impossible to check each and every liberal website, but as of this writing (3/23/21, at 1:37 pm), we still cannot access Liberty Daily.
DDoS attacks are launched with the help of a botnet. This network of sleeper cells can be prompted to visit a certain website at the same time. This can cause a website to slow down severely or even shut down completely.
Hackers perform these attacks out of revenge, for money gain, or even just for fun. Because of the scale of these attacks it is virtually impossible for websites to protect themselves against them. However, some DDoS attacks are launched at individual IP addresses in gaming. You can protect yourself against this type of attack with a VPN.
DDoS stands for “distributed denial-of-service” and is used more and more in cyber attacks. With a DDoS attack any website can be temporarily taken down by hackers. Sometimes this means a website becomes extremely slow, but is also happens that a website isn’t accessible to users at all.
DDoS attacks happen every single day to websites all over the world. As we have found in our research, some do it for money, others for extortion or revenge and for some, shutting down a site, costing them the revenue, losing them readers or customers for sites that sell stuff, is nothing more than “fun.”
Once again, according to VPN Overview, new DDoS attacks are on the rise.
Many times is is government actors, whether foreign or domestic flexing their muscles against websites that are trying to get the truth out rather than the preferred narrative of the day.
(ANP EMERGENCY FUNDRAISER: Due to unexpected expenses recently striking, please consider donating to ANPto help keep us in this ‘Info-war’ for America at this critical time in US history. With ‘slow-Joe’ Biden ‘sitting in’ as US president and at a time of systematic, ‘big tech’ censorship and widespread Democrat corruption, ‘independent media’ and alternative views are crucial for America’s future.
EXPECT MORE DDoS ATTACKS AGAINST CONSERVATIVES
As happened during the Obama years, cyber attacks against conservatives websites can be expected to rise again now that another liberal is occupying the White House.
As Independent Media websites report on the failures of the Biden regime, such as lack of border security, the crisis at the border, the reports of 400 migrants stuffed in plastic containers with the capacity cap of 260.
The gaffes, Biden’s falls, and any other bits of news the MSM tries to hide or spin to protect Biden and Democrats, they will see an uptick in threats aimed at their websites.
Unfortunately some websites actually teach users how to perform DDoS attacks, which allows even newbies to learn how to conduct a cyber attack.
As ANP readers can attest, since Biden was installed in the White House, suddenly spam bots have inundated the site with Stefan and I spending a significant portion of our day deleting hundreds of spam comments, as well as readers helping considerably by flagging the spammers.
There are a number of different types of attacks to expect.
DDoS of course to attempt to shut down a website and make it inaccessible to real users.
Spam bot attacks, as discussed above.
Trolls, paid or just liberals with way too much time on their hands, coming to do nothing but attack readers, trying to drive traffic away from a website.
Actual hacks as ANP suffered in the past, where we have to move everyone to our backup site, until we could purchase added protection, which has worked amazingly well by the way.
Defacement attacks, where a cybercriminal replaces a website’s content with their own.
This content or image may be shocking in nature, or push a political agenda. Think of defacements as the digital version of graffiti spray-painted on a storefront. If your visitors cannot access your site due to a defacement, they won’t be able to make a purchase, and they may lose trust in your site altogether.
A ransomware attack occurs when cybercriminals hold website’s files hostage by encrypting or deleting them, and demanding payment in exchange for the key.
Backdoors are a type of malware that act as an entry point for cybercriminals. True to their name, backdoors are usually left after a cybercriminal gains access to a site in order to ensure they can re-enter and continue to damage your site unnoticed.
ANP will use the newsletter to keep readers updated as to the status of the website should anything happen to make it inaccessible.
If you wake up one morning and notice many of the sites you prefer are not loading, including ANP, it is extremely likely the site will be back up and running shortly.
If a website has not become accessible in a reasonable amount of time, check a site like IsItDown to find out if it is your computer or if the site is down for everyone.
Another suggestion would be to create an email account just for the purpose of newsletters and sign up to newsletter from all your favorite websites, thereby making it so your main email is not inundated with newsletters.
Some folks like to keep a way to communicate with each other if their favorite site/comment section is down, so we at ANP are always willing to pass on a message and/or email addy ONLY if both readers give permission via email.
Just as we promote preparing for offline issues or scenarios, via prepping, we also suggest to prepare and plan for the possibility your preferred websites to go down…even if just temporarily.
Pornography as Social Engineering, May 1964 – PLAYBOY playmates were “the girl next door.” They were not models. They had a wholesome innocence that PLAYBOY destroyed. More than anything, PLAYBOY turned women into sex objects. Its message was that all women were available without marriage.
Iluminati Hooked Boomers on Porn to Destroy Marriage/Family
With messianic fervor, PLAYBOY took its message of sexual freedom to the American male who, in the 1950s and 1960s, still consecrated sex for marriage. But the freedom was illusory. PlAYBOY’s aim was to undermine marriage and hook men on sex for its own sake.
At age 71, I am starting to appreciate the harm done by my youthful addiction to PLAYBOY.
It wasn’t called sex addiction then but it was. PLAYBOY made me see women as sex objects. That’s a cliche but the implications were profound.
When you dehumanize them, you cannot see them for whomthey really are.
You are much less likely to succeed because you cannot relate to them as human beings. Men put them on pedestals because they had the keys to sexual “Holy Grail.” Whenever we place anything before being true to ourselves, we become its slave. Women want leaders, not slaves. The Illuminati deliberately destabilized male-female relationships by making us behave like homosexuals, focused on appearance & sex.
Born from Cabalism (Satanism,) the Illuminati created Communism, which regards women as sexual utilities. Thanks to feminism, women have exchanged the loving roles of wife and mother for promiscuous sex and meaningless careers.
Hugh Hefner was probably a crypto-Jew. Most of the editors were Jews. The PLAYBOY philosophy was the liberal agenda (Communism): sexual permissiveness, feminism, homosexuality and weaponizing racial minorities to undermine social cohesion.
In the rearview mirror, it’s now clear porn is used as a form of political and spiritual seduction
I doubt if women were always seen as sex objects. They had to sexualize women. PLAYBOY undressed the “girl next door.”
PLAYBOY was presented as advanced thinking. But in retrospect, it was really social engineering. With messianic fervor, PLAYBOY took its message of sexual freedom to the American male who, in the 1950s and 1960s, still consecrated sex for marriage. But the freedom was illusory. PlAYBOY’s aim was to undermine marriage and hook men on sex for its own sake.
To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage. In Judith Reisman’s words, “Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men’s fears of women and family commitment. Playboy offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous heterosexual love.”(“Soft Porn Plays Hardball,” p 47)
After 20 years of marriage, I know that marriage is the most reliable and satisfying venue for sex. Outside of a committed relationship, sex is just masturbation.
At age 11 in 1961, magazine pictures of women showing cleavage or leg had a magical quality for me. Pretty soon, my friends were stealing PLAYBOY from newsstands. I was also tempted.
With some trepidation, I approached my father. In the spirit of the times, (“sex is natural, repression is bad”) he bought me a copy. Pretty soon I was a subscriber, in more ways than one.
My father’s decision vastly increased my trust and confidence in him. But sex became a surrogate religion. It was something sacred that took place between angelic creatures in secluded garrets. The beautiful buxom centerfolds pasted on the inside of my closet doors filled me with a near-religious awe.
PLAYBOY packaged this religion of sex. There was no interest in real women as flawed human beings. The subjects of love, marriage, children, and aging were ignored or disparaged. There was nothing about true masculinity and femininity. The religion of sex was curiously asexual.
Nevertheless, it took over my subconscious. My erotic dreams often involved PLAYBOY pictures. I can relate, albeit in milder terms, to porn addict “Mike” who wrote on this site that he prefers packaged porn to real sex.
This is the reason so many men, especially prominent Jews, have fallen victim to #MeToo.They don’t know how to form a permanent relationship, which is what women want.
REAL WOMEN INVISIBLE
Women who were not beautiful became invisible. I could not take them seriously. My first wife was plain-looking. She had spoken to me twice before we became neighbors at the university library. I had absolutely no recollection.
(left, a measure of my brainwashing to this day, I searched for the attractive
The fixation on physical beauty was psychologically emasculating. How did I approach someone when I was mesmerized by their beauty? Attractive women remained mystical goddesses. I put them on a pedestal. I was too needy. I couldn’t see women as vulnerable human beings inside a shiny shell.
I lost touch with my masculine identity, my feelings, and critical faculties. I wanted love but didn’t know how to get it.
I was part of the (homo) sexual revolution, part of a generation of sexual fashion victims. Despite the example of my father, I didn’t grasp the eternal model of masculinity: A man’s backbone is his work, my dad said. He leads and looks after the woman and children he loves. (Love is key here. Satanists hate love.)
Unconsciously, men and women are still looking for this kind of relationship. Feminism is a lesbian philosophy teaching women to usurp the male role. Both sexes are lost. had no identity, goal, or motivation. I spent my time looking for them in social action and eastern religion.
I married the average looking woman because I was NOT obsessively attracted to her. I was tired of being ruled by my desire. She was a feminist with a career, allowing me to pursue my own interests. Eventually, inevitably, I hungered for more.
I fell in love with a beautiful insecure young woman who exploited my idealization by maintaining a facade. I divorced my wife and lived with this woman for six years. For a long time, she infatuated me. My love was totally giving, in the hope of securing her love. Mature love is demanding; she would have responded to that.
I missed the opportunity to have a normal family. I have only one son from my first marriage. The social engineers scored a victory with me, and countless other men like me.
NOW,WE’RE ALL SEX ADDICTS (TO SOME DEGREE)
In normal heterosexuality, sex is reserved for the courtship and procreation stage. With parenthood, sex becomes less important. Thanks to porn, we have been re-engineered to behave like homosexuals, to have anonymous sex, and never marry or have children.
Instead of families, we have sex. Sex from cradle to grave with multiple partners. Sex. Everywhere you look. All the time. Like many homosexuals, we suffer from arrested development.
Marriage is not having to impress a new person constantly. People are actually looking for love, not sex.
The habit of grading females in terms of sex appeal is hard to break. There is something exhilarating about a lithe beautiful woman in the prime of life. I rationalize that my DNA is clamoring for a new vehicle. But I am too old to become a father again.
Maybe DNA is our real identity and our “lives” are mere ripples on the waters of eternity.
Beauty is just skin deep. Women, like men, are flawed human beings struggling for a breath of fresh air in our toxic culture.
Witnessing the unprecedented increase in pedophilia, porn, birth control, and homosexuality in America and the world
, it highlights, by the violation of them, the two main tenets of every great society. Not only are these two tenets in the Bible, though the dysfunctional modern Christian church has badly lost its way, but, the brilliant British agnostic anthropologist J.D. Unwin, highlighted them in his seminal 1934 exhaustive study of both civilized and uncivilized societies. The two rules he found that led to successful societies were, sex must be delayed until heterosexual marriage, and it must be confined there after marriage.
Incredibly, he began his studies to prove the Freudian psychobabble that societies that did not freely indulge in sex were “repressed” and inferior. He found exactly the opposite. He studied 80 uncivilized societies and 6 civilized societies and found the exact same pattern repeating itself. Every society that left these two tenets, collapsed on the third generation. America is on the third generation now.
This is in the Bible too. Pharaoh went about destroying the Jews the wrong way. He tried to kill their male children, and work them hard. The family unit and religion was left intact. In America, not only are babies being slaughtered, and we are being worked hard by taxes, inflation, and regulations, but the family unit and church are under unprecedented attack, with milquetoast pastors failing to protect their churches and preach truth. Balaam advised the Moabite King Balak what to do to destroy a culture.
Revelation 2:14. But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.
And that is what Balak did, sending in the Moabite women to seduce the Jewish men, leading to 1 Cor 10:8, “Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.”
Not only did 23,000 Jews die in one day from a plague, for fornication, but, Phinehas, the grandson of Aaron, took a javelin and gave a leading prince of the tribe of Simeon, Zimri, the death penalty for taking a Princess of Moab in a tent and fornicating with her in full view of the congregation. He literally killed them both in the act of coitus.
And, until America has men with the zeal and moral compass of Phinehas, our slavery and plagues will not end.
The book is here. Dovber Halevi describes being a libertine, and being liberated from libertinism.
According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Joe and Deb Schum of Atlanta aren’t worried about baby proofing their house or buying a car seat. As a matter of fact, the couple doesn’t ever intend to have children and they are proud of their childlessness. According to the newspaper’s report, “the Schums are part of a growing number of couples across the country for whom kids don’t factor in the marriage equation.”
The paper also pointed to the fact the nation’s birthrate fell last year to an historic low of 66.9 births per 1,000 women age 15-44. That represents a decline of 43% since just 1960. “Many childless couples,” according to the report, “revel in their decision, despite badgering from baffled mothers and friends. Others struggle with the choice before keeping the house kid-free.”
The Schums just don’t want kids to get in the way of their lifestyle. They enjoy cruising to the Georgia mountains on their matching Harley-Davidson motorcycles. They love their gourmet kitchen, outfitted with the very latest stainless steel appliances and trendy countertops. Deb Schum explains, “if we had kids, we would need a table where the kids could do homework.” Clearly, children aren’t a part of their interior design plan.
This pattern of childlessness has caught the attention of others in the media. The left-wing internet site Salon.com actually published a series of articles entitled, “To Breed or Not to Breed.” This series of articles featured couples and individuals who have decided that children are not a part of their chosen lifestyle.
One woman wrote that parenthood just isn’t a part of her plan, regardless of cultural expectations to the contrary. Motherhood just doesn’t fit her self-image or her schedule. “I compete in triathlons; my husband practices martial arts; we both have fulfilling careers; we travel the world … we enjoy family and friends; we have a fun, intimate relationship.”
For others, the bottom line is simply financial. One woman asked: “What would the return be on the investment? Are there any laws that would require my children to pay for my nursing home when I am old? Are they going to be a sufficient hedge against poverty and loneliness?” A return on investment?
Some who have chosen to be childless have actually formed organizations in order to band together. The group “No Kidding” was formed in Atlanta four years ago as a social outlet for couples choosing to have no children. Traci Swartz, an occupational therapist in her thirties, joined “No Kidding” with her husband Jeremy, a 32 year old computer analyst. “When you don’t have children, you are not involved in any activities like a lot of other people, like soccer and ballet,” said Traci.
She explained that “No Kidding” members are more likely to talk about pets, travel, or other common interests. Kids rarely come up as a topic of conversation. “People think we sit around and talk about how we hate kids, but we almost never mention kids,” Traci explained. No wonder.
Another woman in the Atlanta group explained, “you focus those motherly feelings elsewhere. For us, our dogs get all that love.” That worldview is sick, but more and more common.
Christians must recognize that this rebellion against parenthood represents nothing less than an absolute revolt against God’s design. The Scripture points to barrenness as a great curse and children as a divine gift. The Psalmist declared: “Behold, children are a gift of the Lord, the fruit of the womb is a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior, so are the children of one’s youth. How blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them; they will not be ashamed when they speak with their enemies in the gate.” [Psalm 127: 3-5]
Morally speaking, the epidemic in this regard has nothing to do with those married couples who desire children but are for any reason unable to have them, but in those who are fully capable of having children but reject this intrusion in their lifestyle.
The motto of this new movement of chosen childlessness could be encapsulated by the bumper sticker put out by the Zero Population Growth group in the 1970s: “MAKE LOVE, NOT BABIES.” This is the precise worldview the Scripture rejects. Marriage, sex, and children are part of one package. To deny any part of this wholeness is to reject God’s intention in creation–and His mandate revealed in the Bible.
The sexual revolution has had many manifestations, but we can now see that modern Americans are determined not only to liberate sex for marriage [and even from gender], but also from procreation.
The Scripture does not even envision married couples who choose not to have children. The shocking reality is that some Christians have bought into this lifestyle and claim childlessness as a legitimate option. The rise of modern contraceptives has made this technologically possible. But the fact remains that though childlessness may be made possible by the contraceptive revolution, it remains a form of rebellion against God’s design and order.
Couples are not given the option of chosen childlessness in the biblical revelation. To the contrary, we are commanded to receive children with joy as God’s gifts, and to raise them in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. We are to find many of our deepest joys and satisfactions in the raising of children within the context of the family. Those who reject children want to have the joys of sex and marital companionship without the responsibilities of parenthood. They rely on others to produce and sustain the generations to come.
This epidemic of chosen childlessness will not be corrected by secular rethinking. In an effort to separate the pleasure of sex from the power of procreation, modern Americans think that sex totally free from constraint or conception is their right. Children, of course, do represent a serious constraint on the life of parents. Parenthood is not a hobby, but represents one of the most crucial opportunities for the making of saints found in this life.
The culture is clearly buying into this concept. Legal fights over apartment complexes and other accommodations come down to the claim that adults ought to be able to live in a child-free environment. Others claim that too much tax money and public attention is given to children, and that this is an unfair imposition upon those who choose not to “breed.” Of course, the very use of this terminology betrays the rebellion in this argument. Animals breed. Human beings procreate and raise children to the glory of God.
Without doubt, children do impose themselves upon our creature comforts, waking us up in the middle of the night with demanding needs and inconvenient interruptions. Parents learn all too quickly that children are not only the smiling cherub sleeping in the crib, but also the dirty-faced preschooler, the headstrong teenager, and the boisterous grade-schooler.
The church should insist that the biblical formula calls for adulthood to mean marriage and marriage to mean children. This reminds us of our responsibility to raise boys to be husbands and fathers and girls to be wives and mothers. God’s glory is seen in this, for the family is a critical arena where the glory of God is either displayed or denied. It is just as simple as that.
The church must help this society regain its sanity on the gift of children. Willful barrenness and chosen childlessness must be named as moral rebellion. To demand that marriage means sex–but not children–is to defraud the creator of His joy and pleasure in seeing the saints raising His children. That is just the way it is. No kidding.