Jeffrey Prather – The CIA, FBI & DOJ are Deep State Traitors

November 21, 2020

Jeffrey Prather explains the “Kraken” and describes, 
The Great Reset vs. the Great Awakening”

Intelligence update: The Great Reset vs. the Great Awakening – the grand battle taking place right now for the future of America and the free world


By Mike Adams( 
In another fascinating chapter that’s now emerging, former military insider and present-day analyst Jeffrey Prather ( has released a bombshell video describing the real war taking place behind the scenes: “The Great Reset vs. the Great Awakening.”

As he explains it, the CIA, FBI, and DOJ are all treasonous swamp creatures who are dedicated to bringing down America, stealing the election, and imprisoning all the real patriots such as Gen. Flynn (and Roger Stone). Meanwhile, certain sectors of special forces operations and now Chris Miller as Acting Defense Secretary, are all aligned with Trump, the Constitution, and defending America against its enemies, both foreign and domestic.
Yesterday, Chris Miller declared that all special forces operations units now report directly to him, bypassing the corrupt DoD swamp that works for the globalists and the Democrats. This puts the many tens of thousands of special forces operations units and assets directly under the control of a pro-America patriot, and it points to the “Plan B” plan in all this, which is for Trump to invoke the NDAA and Insurrection Act, then dispatch special forces units across the USA to arrest all the treasonous actors and take down the Big Tech and Big Media traitors who are part of this grand conspiracy to overthrow the United States government.
Jeffrey Prather’s video is shown above. This video is also going to appear on soon, just in case YouTube deletes it. Some of the more notable highlights from this video include:
Chris Miller is a patriot who will act decisively to defend the United States of America.
Bill Barr and Durham are both swamp creatures working for the deep state and the CIA. They will never indict any of the real criminals in America, such as Obama, Clinton, Biden, Brennan, etc.
The US Army, Navy, and Marines have all been infiltrated by deep state traitors at some level, but the Air Force and Space Force are loyal to Trump and are staffed mostly by patriots.
Other sources tell us that most of the actual mid-level people in the armed forces are pro-Trump regardless of which branch they’re in, but the higher-level generals and bureaucrats are treasonous swamp scum.
Trump will win Georgia, and the Democrats are panicking to try to steal that election in any way they can.
The “Kraken” is actually a DoD-run cyberwarfare program that tracks and hacks various other systems to acquire evidence of nefarious actions by the deep state.
Trump loyalists in the Air Force, Space Command, and now in certain sectors of the DoD and even the NSA have all the evidence of vote fraud and election-related treason.
Trump has all this now and will be using it against the enemies of America very soon.
Ezra Cohen-Watnick, Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, is a patriot and a very smart person who is working behind the scenes to save America from corrupt, criminal Democrats, deep staters, and foreign enemies like China.—
Related – Mike Adams– Trump’s Epic Counter Attack Coming

Americans, like the famous downtrodden worm, are starting to turn

By Andrea Widburg

We’ve all noticed that, thanks to the Wuhan virus, the rich have gotten richer. By trapping people in their homes and destroying small business, Democrat governments have allowed oligarchs such as Bezos, Zuckerburg, and Gates, to increase their wealth by exponential amounts. What’s flown under the radar, though, is that for many months, government employees and politicians haven’t shared the people’s pain. In Buffalo, New York, beleaguered business owners finally had enough.

Conservative publications have focused heavily on the fact that leftist cities used the overdose death of an ex-felon as an excuse to “reimagine” policing by destroying it. However, there doesn’t seem to have been the same fallout for those government employees charged with enforcing the lockdowns. Around the world, they are still employed and extremely powerful.

Not all law enforcement officers, of course, are flexing their muscles this way. A Howell, New Jersey police chief went public with his refusal to enforce the Thanksgiving crackdown:

In Fulton County New York, the sheriff refused to enforce Gov. Cuomo’s latest draconian edict:

And in California, sheriffs are resisting enforcing Gov. Newsom’s authoritarian demands.

Bravo to all those men and women who are taking a stand against tyranny.

Still, there are sheriffs and other government workers willing to pretend that America is East Germany and that ordinary people are the enemies of the state. The question is how much longer ordinary people are going to accept this treatment?

In Buffalo, New York, approximately 50 business owners and their supporters had gathered inside a gym to protest New York’s “orange” zone regulations which once again have shut down gyms, salons, and other “nonessential” businesses (as if they’re not essential to people whose livelihoods depend on those businesses).

The Erie County government got word of the meeting and sent over three sheriff’s deputies and a health inspector, all intent upon shutting down the meeting. Instead of the meek compliance law enforcement expects to receive from law-abiding business people, these government minions got serious pushback.

Someone else cried out, “You’re on private property. You have to leave.” “Get out! Get out!” people cried. The health inspector claimed that she had “compassion” for those whose lives are being destroyed, but clearly intended to shut down the gathering. Instead, the crowd chased all four county officials out, telling them to come back with a warrant. The crowd also reminded the deputies that those assembled were not violating any law.

The merchants then started chanting “Get out.” The government workers got the message and left, with the crowd keeping the chant going as they escorted the deputies and health inspector (who was worriedly talking on her phone) not just out of the building but off the property. The crowd’s chant changed to “We will not comply.” Then taking a page out of BLM’s book, someone told law enforcement, “This is a protest.”

Ordinary Americans are angry. While the elite are making money, the political classes still have a job, the leftists are running riot in the street and imagining a reset, and the Democrats are reveling in a stolen election, more than 80 million Americans are getting fed-up. They’ve been locked up, insulted, bankrupted, and now they’ve seen their votes destroyed. They’re mad as Hell and they’re beginning to refuse to take it anymore.

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Understanding the left’s plan for a ‘Great Reset’

By Andrea Widburg

The term “the great reset” is suddenly en vogue. For leftists, it’s shorthand for using the systemic change flowing from the world’s response to the Wuhan virus as a springboard for remaking the world in a leftist, greenie mold. Or as Rahm Emanuel said, never let a crisis go to waste.

The left has wanted to break the system for 55 years. Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, two professors of social work at Columbia University, first articulated the idea in a paper for The Nation, entitled, “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty.”

Cloward and Piven found it disheartening that the poor failed to optimize the welfare benefits to which they were entitled (“it is not generally known that for every person on the rolls at least one more probably meets existing criteria of eligibility but is not obtaining assistance”). They claimed this wasn’t a flaw in the welfare system; instead, it was “an integral feature.”

The two socialists declared that any challenge to the system “would precipitate a profound financial and political crisis” – and they wanted that precipitation. By “a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls,” they intended to destroy the welfare system and force federal intervention. “The ultimate objective of this strategy [was] to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income.”

Since then, we apply the phrase “Cloward-Piven strategy” to any leftist plan that envisions breaking the system to remake the system.

In 2020, leftists have forced system breakage. While the political class and super-wealthy leftists (Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, the Waltons) have seen their fortunes soar to the level of Byzantine potentates, much of America is broken or near breaking. This is not hyperbole. The American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) has published “Cost of Lockdowns: A Preliminary Report.”

The report makes for grim reading. Every negative metric is up, with most having increased by dramatic amounts: mental health problems, substance abuse, suicidal ideation, anxiety, demands on food banks, extreme poverty, food insecurity, undernourishment, unemployment, decreased life expectancy, fatal cancer, missed cancer diagnoses, cardiovascular deaths, murder, property theft, failed businesses, and more.

Trump has done his best to counteract the breakage, using economic policies, supercharged treatment timelines, and miraculous vaccination development. His reward for this effort is that the statists (billionaires, politicians, academics, journalists) have committed fraud on an epic scale to oust Trump. In his place, they plan on a socialist administration committed to increasing government dependency.

Once the majority of people are dependent on the government, it’s time for “The Great Reset.” There’s even a website, to which Antonio Chavez, who drew the parody image that graces this post, introduced me.

A video at the site explains what’s going on: The Wuhan virus has been a useful pause in the way we’ve abused the world. (National Geographic was one of many sites suggesting that decreased pollution during the lockdown should “inspire us to do better.”)

“We now have an opportunity to use our influence for society and the planet’s best interest,” intones a heavily accented Cockney voice. And then comes that word BLM activists threw around: It’s time to “reimagine” society.

The “reset” concept is the brainchild of two men: Klaus Schwab (an engineer who is eerily like Auric Goldfinger) and Thierry Malleret (a futurist journalist). At the World Economic Forum, they joined with some of the world’s wealthiest (and often least savory, useful, or moral) people to discuss a better way to control the rest of the world – all for the little people’s benefit, of course, and with those assembled providing the world’s leadership . . . that is, when they’re not eating caviar and drinking fine wines. Stripped of its fancy trappings, the Great Reset is simple: Socialism, sold as the answer to apocalyptic climate change.

In this brave new world, there will be no pollution, no climate destruction, and no private property (although one gets the feeling that the movement’s advocates, people like Prince Charles, will keep their stuff). Overpopulation will also end (although, again, I’m betting that the nomenklatura will keep their procreative rights).

At bottom, the only thing that will distinguish this Brave New reset world from the Middle Ages, given that the ultimate plan is to roll back the industrial era, will be that what little energy is still produced will be used for computers to control us. Otherwise, the world will be home to absolute monarchs and serfs.

Stripped of its cult-like language, the Reset is a typical leftist Utopian project. As with all such projects, it will fail – but not before the world first welters in blood, pain, and death. We’d better hope Trump really released the Kraken, or else there are ugly times ahead.

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

The left snookered us, but this time it’s far worse

To my memory, the word “snooker” was used to define politicians starting with President Bill Clinton, although many may argue that almost all politicians tend to snooker the public.  But looking at Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden, it is easy to feel snookered.

I know that many Democrats will argue that President Trump is really the one who has snookered us, but it is difficult to see that.  While Trump has a mannerism that is revolting to many people, he does exactly what he says he will do, so really no trickery there.

He said he would cut taxes; improve the economy; wipe out ISIS; rein in North Korea; confront China; arm Ukraine; bring home American troops fighting in endless wars; fill judicial vacancies with constitutionalist judges; start the Space Force; reduce income inequality; reduce the poverty rate to historic lows; reduce the unemployment rate for black Americans, Hispanics, and Asians to record lows; pass prison reform; and ensure long-term funding for historically Black Colleges.

He did exactly what he said he would do when he campaigned.  Certainly no snookering here.

On the other hand, Bill Clinton really snookered us.  Since before his tenure as attorney general in Arkansas and through his governorship and presidency, he was constantly getting into trouble, sometimes with criminal implications.

Clinton, however, was always able to talk and dance his way out of it.  From the Whitewater scandal to his efforts to avoid the draft to his claim that he “didn’t inhale” when he tried smoking marijuana, “Slick Willie” kept avoiding the consequences of his actions.Perhaps the most blatant example of his snookering concerned his adultery.  Forced to answer questions about his behavior before a grand jury, he lied.  He then snookered us by clinging to fine distinctions about the definition of sexual relations.

President Obama also snookered us in 2012.  Running for re-election he told us we are better off in 2012 than we were in 2008, when the economy  was in the middle of a recession.  By late 2012, about 15% of the roughly 120 million households had an adult who was unemployed, under-employed, or discouraged from seeking work.

Almost 70 million households had seen the value of their primary investment (the home) decline in value.  Almost all workers had seen stagnant wages or a decline in income.  While the recession technically ended more than three years prior, the recovery had been almost nonexistent.

And then he tried to tell us it was George Bush’s fault we were in this mess and unless we re-elected Obama, we would go back to worse times.

Obama also snookered us when he passed the Affordable Care Act.  He assured us we could keep our doctor, that we could keep our health care plan, and that premiums would fall.  Never happened.

Hillary Clinton also snookered us, saying she did nothing wrong with her private server for all of her emails.  And anything she deleted had nothing to do with sensitive or classified information.  Investigations, including Anthony Weiner’s laptop, showed otherwise.

Now we have Joe Biden, who claims to be the president-elect.  Trump’s attorneys say this time the Dems are doing more than just snookering us.  This time, they went much farther.

Some of Biden’s snookering is not that substantial.  He says he will raise taxes only on Americans who earn more than $400,000 annually.  The problem is that’s a tiny percentage of the population, not nearly enough to pay for all of his proposed programs.  He is snookering us here.

Other snookering is more substantial.  Biden says he will be tough on China.  Although the mainstream media mostly fail to report on his dealings with China, there may be enough there to compromise his position and make him less willing to be tough on China.  Another snookering.

He says he will improve relations with countries worldwide, but during the Obama/Biden years, North Korea became aggressive, ISIS formed a caliphate, Russia annexed part of Ukraine with no U.S. response, and China greatly expanded its worldwide influence.  Perhaps Biden is snookering us about this.

Even more than snookering is the involvement the Democratic Party may have had in falsifying voter counts.  Trump’s attorneys say they have enough proof of this activity to swing the election to Trump’s favor.  It remains to be seen if that is accurate.

If it is accurate, the Dems’ snookering has turned much more severe.

Michael Busler, Ph.D. is a public policy analyst and a professor of finance at Stockton University, where he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in finance and economics.  

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

From ‘Don’t tread on me’ to obsequiousness

Leftists have long-since taken over our schools. They have tossed out the classics and an honest teaching of Western Civilization. They have bastardized and rewritten American history to serve their own nefarious aims. 

They have weaponized ignorance.

As a result, too many sheeple people have no idea what’s happening around them. 

Many believe the Black Lives Matter and Antifa protests have been “mostly peaceful” and that these groups just want equal justice and a more tolerant society. Most still don’t know that Antifa is a domestic anarchic terrorist group that believes violence is the only legitimate form of protest against American society. Most still don’t know that the heads of Black Lives Matter openly state that the group is pro-Marxist and intends to “disrupt” the nuclear family.

And most are utterly unaware that Democrats used COVID-19 as a Trojan Horse to get them into the White House despite the incumbent’s impressive record of accomplishments. And that they will now attempt to crush all dissent so they will never have to relinquish power again. (Conservative sites are being attacked and de-platformed as I write this, and you read it.  Let us expend every effort to make sure that doesn’t happen.) 

And, while I wholeheartedly support people’s right to wear facial masks if they so desire, particularly during the ongoing pandemic, there are many conflicting studies on the efficacy of doing so. There are studies that purport to show that mask wearing has little or no effect on the transmission of the coronavirus. There are also valid reasons for believing that the long-term deleterious effects of mask wearing, like lockdowns, outweigh any benefits. 

What is most remarkable to me, however, is that the majority of people don’t see that masks are, literally, an in-your-face symbol of our rulers’ control over us. They tell us to cover our mouths and shut the hell up, and the vast majority of us do as we are told, unquestioningly. Unbelievable. Even some Europeans have been revolting against mask mandates. But we Americans have been good little compliant chumps. (Except for Antifa and BLM, but those groups are anti-American and, as such, are sanctioned by our elite Democratic politicians and their sycophants in the media.)

Does anyone seriously believe Washington, Adams, Madison, Franklin, Jefferson, et. al., would have donned masks had George III mandated that the colonists do so? Inside their own homes as Pennsylvania now demands of its citizens? The answer to that question goes a long way towards unmasking why our leftist leaders detest them so much.

Americans have gone from telling oppressive governments “Don’t Tread on Me” to telling them: “You want me to obstruct my breathing apparatus and never leave my home for a year or two? Okay, I’ll do it. Anything else, master?” 

Mask mandates rob us of our humanity. 

Our servility does too.

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Matt Braynard’s data analytics have paid off

Andrea Widburg

Over the course of two days, I introduced American Thinker readers to Matt Braynard. The first time I wrote about him, he’d run a successful GoFundMe campaign to fund research into fraudulent votes. The second time, I reported that GoFundMe had deplatformed him and returned all the pledged money. I can now update you about Matt’s work: He was able to complete his project and it’s paid off in the form of support for Trump’s legal challenges to the election.

Just three days after the election, I wrote about Matt Braynard, who had made a successful GoFundMe pitch for money he planned to use for a sophisticated data analytics program. It would allow him to determine how many “voters” in the contested states were dead people, non-residents, or infrequent voters whose identities were stolen.

Only one day later, I wrote about Matt’s travails with GoFundMe. The platform had kicked him off because it disagreed with the project he sought to fund:

We raised $220k on GoFundMe before we were deleted for “Prohibited Content.” None of the money was disbursed to us.  This is the same platform that raises money for bail for terrorists. Help us out by 2x’ing what you gave before to help make up what we lost.

That’s how the left rolls: It pretends to create a free and open marketplace of ideas and then, when it attains dominance in the market, it silences views with which it disagrees.

Fortunately, Matt was able to obtain crowdsourced funding again through GiveSendGo, a Christian crowdfunding site.

One day later, with money again flowing in, Matt published a video explaining the project he was creating with that money. It’s a fascinating video.

Matt explains the complex computer program he and his team were creating to track cemetery votes, out-of-state votes, and other improper votes. Every time a living person was identified who shouldn’t have been voting, Matt would have someone call that person to determine whether his or her name had been used to cast a fraudulent vote. If his team identified someone whose identity had been stolen, Matt got an affidavit to that effect from the voter:

(Incidentally, when an exhausted Matt recited his resume, he inadvertently stated that he’d worked on the “1996” Trump campaign. He later tweeted out that, of course, he’d meant the 2016 Trump campaign.)

On Saturday, Matt was able to update people with the results of his project:

Matt also took some time out from his extraordinarily busy schedule to remind Democrats that they once supported weeding out illegal activity connected to voting:

When you hear one of Trump’s lawyers talk about affidavits proving massive, on-the-ground voter fraud, you’ll now understand how they were able to get that information: Matt Braynard had a good idea and, despite GoFundMe’s best efforts to block him, enough people sent money his way that he was able to put that idea into effect.

In this fight, we all matter. Let’s hope, now, that an honest judge is willing to do the right thing.

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

The easiest way to see how well solar and wind are doing

We have all heard on the media and on TV that solar and wind electrical energy is getting cheaper, and often much cheaper than that generated by coal, gas, oil, or nuclear.  Here are some recent article titles:

  • “Solar and wind costs continue to fall as power becomes cleaner,” Forbes, April 30, 2020
  • “Solar power will cost less than coal, Bloomberg Green, June 2, 2020; Solar and wind power will cost less than coal by 2030 according to one analyst’s math,” Barrons, Energy Features, Nov 25, 2019

However, there are enormous scientific, technical, and economic barriers that these “new” energy forms must overcome before they can be regarded as economical — barriers that are, in reality, just about impossible to overcome.  They have been described by recently by Michael Shellenberger, a well known environmentalist, in his recent book Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All.

The skeptical arguments, while correct, are not necessarily easy for a layman to follow.  After all, who notices or cares if, to build solar panels, we have to dig up a lot of indium somewhere, most likely in some remote African country, which will not complain about us trashing its environment and paying its citizens slave wages?

However, one thing all of us do understand is price. There is “a gigantic laboratory” in Europe.  It is France and Germany.  France for years has generated most of its electricity (~75–80%) by nuclear power.  Germany, in about 2000, adopted a different route.  It has embarked on an “energiewende,” a German word for energy transformation to solar and wind.  Accordingly, it has decommissioned many of its coal fired power plants and is in the process of decommissioning what once were its 17 nuclear power reactors.  At this point, it is getting about 25–30% of its electrical power from wind and solar and the rest from other sources.

Look up articles on the energiewende, and you will see some articles calling it a smashing success.  For instance, see “The spectacular success of the German Energiewende- and what needs to be done next” (The Energy Post, E.U., October 10, 2017).  Others call it a dismal failure.  For instance, see “German Failure on the Road to a Renewable Future,” Der Spiegel, May 13, 2019.

Where does the truth lie?

There is one thing anybody can easily figure out: despite all the claims of low cost solar and wind, how do the costs of electricity in Germany and France compare?  Furthermore, since the whole purpose of the energiewende is to reduce the CO2 input into the atmosphere, how well do Germany and France do?  This is simple, noncontroversial, and easy to find.

Below is a graph of the price of a kilowatt-hour of electric energy in Germany, France and, the United States, in euro cents, from 1980 to about 2020.  Also shown on the graph are plots of per capita CO2 emission into the atmosphere in tons per year.  These are taken and plotted from various internet sources.

The graph shows that, at least up to now, after about 20 years, the German energiewende has failed on both counts.  It has not reduced the price of electricity, but rather has greatly increased it.  It has not reduced the per capita German CO2 emission into the atmosphere as compared to France, or even the United States (in fact, most of the German reduction shown here predates on the energiewende).

The conclusion is obvious.  Sunlight and wind are free, but solar- and wind-powered electricity is very, very expensive.  Sunlight and wind are clean, but turning them into electricity is not.

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

In times of disgrace, a refreshing sendoff from a noble man

In this day and age of identity politics, crass kowtowing to the lowest denominator of behavior, it is exhilarating — in fact, downright refreshing — to read the words of a gentleman who epitomizes what it means to strive for excellence.

William D. Revelli is still an icon in the world of music performance.  For 36 years, he was the director of bands and chair of the Wind Instrument Department at the School of Music at the University of Michigan.  Those who studied under his direction still speak with deep reverence about this man’s impact on them.  Revelli passed away  in July of 1994, but “his influence on the development of band music, not only at Michigan, but in the entire United States, was so profound that not an article is written nor an anecdote told of him without the use of superlatives and frequent mention of the word ‘legendary.'”[1] 

The son of Italian immigrants, Revelli developed the University of Michigan Symphony Band to such a degree that it attained “an international reputation as well.  In 1961, under the auspices of [President Eisenhower’s] International Cultural Exchange Program, the Michigan Symphony Band presented 88 concerts on a 16-week, 30,000 mile tour of the Soviet Union, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Greece, Cyprus, Romania and Poland.  In 1971, the Band on its final tour under the Revelli baton, concluded with a final concert in Carnegie Hall.”[2]

At the time, the New York Times wrote that Revelli “got out of his students what not many bandmasters ever achieve — a brilliant yet luminous texture of tone, a smart-sounding ensemble, well-balanced choirs and instrumental virtuosity.”[3]  In fact, the CD titled “Touchdown, USA” that was recorded in 1961 is still considered an amazing illustration of the exemplary playing of the University of Michigan Band conducted by Dr. Revelli.

My husband was one of those students who was so influenced by Revelli.  He recently discovered a farewell letter written by Revelli to the marching band that reveals a moral compass that so many of our institutions of higher learning have carelessly shed in their left-leaning capitulation to being woke — much to the disadvantage of their students.  The letter reads as follows:

Thursday evening, November 17, 1970

11:45 p.m.

Gentlemen of Michigan:

The evening shadows are long; soon, another day will have passed — gone into eternity — beyond recall, never to return in our times. Tomorrow’s dawn will bring another day — a new opportunity to live, to love, to work, to help each other.

What a great and rewarding season this has been. You have performed nobly; to each and every one of you, I offer my sincere gratitude and eternal thanks.

Come Saturday, we shall give our very best, our all, for our band, our team, our University, and ourselves. Once again, we shall uphold our motto — “Non Tam Pares, Quam Superiores.”[4]

Following is my final message to you. It is not new; you have heard it many times, yet it is as true today as it has been since the birth of mankind and as it will be for centuries to come. I hope you will make it a part of your personal credo — for if it becomes so, then I, too, shall be a part of you — “even if ever so small.”


  1. Excellence. Do not be deceived by the cult of the mediocre — the enemy of excellence, and remember that excellence demands standards. It is revealing to see how often a man who keeps the highest standards in his professional calling will tolerate the lowest of standards elsewhere. Would it not be more desirable to seek in every phase of life the standards that perfection requires?
  2. Adequate Thinking. This means adequate purpose, for purpose, and not L.S.D. or any other drug is the greatest expander of the mind and stimulant of the mental faculties.
  3. Creativity. Abjure cynicism. Do not be deceived by the false intellectualism of the cynic. He is often the man who in his heart knows the truth, and in his mind, has decided not to face it. He devoted his brain to justifying the stultification of his conscience. Cynicism in you strangles creativity in others. Give free rein to heart and conscience; creative imagination will come alive.
  4. Commitment. We hear a great deal about commitment in the University environment, and even in circles where the person has it or not, I think just about everyone is committed to something. The human being is a committed animal by nature. The trouble is, he is usually committed first of all to himself. But, the greatest men and women of history have usually found a worthy commitment far bigger than themselves. Seek that.
  5. Faith. Faith that man’s spirit can carry his abilities far beyond his ordinary capacity. Faith that man’s closest approach to God lies in his whole-souled response to the greatest task he feels God has for him. Faith that man is not a prisoner of circumstances — that he can shape history rather than be shaped by it.
  6. Worthwhile Adventure. Not least, a spirit of a happy worthwhile adventure. The spirit that comes from the heart and talents mobilized for urgent worthy ends.

I love each and every one of you, and I pray that God may bless and keep you healthy and happy always.

Remember — it is not who you are or where you are, but rather what you are that shall bring you life’s joys and happiness.

Sincerely your devoted friend,

William D. Revelli

If only we could return to this sense of purpose, this exalted idea that people can shape their own history, and understand that cynicism is the tool meant to defeat our creativity, perhaps we can turn the tide against the myriad destructive forces that work so assiduously to destroy this great nation.

Eileen can be reached at

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

It was a bloody communist who killed JFK
By Silvio Canto, Jr.

As a kid in Cuba, I sat with my father and watched Fidel Castro on Cuban TV talk about the Kennedy assassination.  I don’t remember what he said, but my dad told me later that Castro was very nervous.  I guess he felt that President Johnson would use the assassination to correct the mistake of the Bay of Pigs.  A few days later, I heard my father and some of his friends say the same thing over a little Cuban coffee and cigars.

It was a tense time in Cuba because the Castro regime was locking up dissidents, such as my father’s cousin, Dr. Ignacio Segurola, who spent 14 years in prison without a trial.  My mother told me recently that she was afraid that my own father would be picked up because he refused to take a job with the newly created national bank that replaced all the privately owned banks expropriated (or as they say “nationalized”) during that time.

Over time, I’ve heard all of the conspiracy theories and watched a few documentaries and even that idiotic Oliver Stone JFK movie that came out in 1991.

Can we finally call it?  President JFK was killed by a crazy guy who was hanging around with communists and supporting the Castro dictatorship in Cuba.

Yes, there were angry right-wingers in Dallas.  Some of them behaved poorly.  However, do you think one of these groups would have “contracted” a head case like Oswald to kill anybody?  My guess is that most of these right-wing groups would have given Oswald a bloody lip for his communist ideas if they ever had a chance to run into him. 

A few years ago, James Piereson put a stake in all of the conspiracies, especially the nonsense about right-wingers in Dallas or the “let’s get into Vietnam” military industrial complex.

Mr. Piereson tells us about Oswald, the communist who killed the president of the U.S.:

The facts are that President Kennedy was a martyr in the Cold War struggle against communism.  The assassin was a communist and not a bigot or a right-winger.  Oswald defected from the U.S. to the Soviet Union in 1959, vowing when he did so that he could no longer live under a capitalist system.  He returned to the U.S. with his Russian wife in 1962, disappointed with life under Soviet communism but without giving up his Marxist beliefs or his hatred of the U.S.  By 1963, Oswald had transferred his political allegiance to Castro’s communist regime in Cuba. 

In April 1963, Oswald attempted to shoot Edwin Walker, a retired U.S. Army general, as he sat at a desk in his dining room.  Walker was the head of the Dallas chapter of the John Birch Society and a figure then in the news because of his opposition to school integration and his demand that the Castro regime be overthrown.  The rifle Oswald used in the attempt at Walker’s life was the one he used to shoot Kennedy. 

Dallas police would not identify Oswald as Walker’s would-be assassin until after the assassination of Kennedy, but Oswald, fearful that he would be identified for the Walker shooting, fled Dallas for New Orleans. 

In June 1963 he established a local chapter of Fair Play for Cuba, a national organization dedicated to gaining diplomatic recognition for Castro’s regime.  Oswald was filmed by a local television station in New Orleans circulating leaflets on behalf of the Castro government and was jailed briefly following a street altercation with anti-Castro Cubans.  Soon thereafter he appeared on a local television program to debate U.S. policy toward Cuba. 

In late September, Oswald left New Orleans to travel to Mexico City in pursuit of a visa that would permit him to travel to Cuba and then to the Soviet Union.  As documented in the Warren Commission Report, he took along a dossier of news clippings on his pro-Castro activities to establish his revolutionary bona fides with personnel at the Cuban and Soviet embassies in the city. 

Oswald returned to Dallas empty-handed after being told that his application would take months to process.  He was still waiting on his application six weeks later when he read that President Kennedy’s forthcoming visit to Texas would include a motorcade through downtown Dallas and past the building where he worked. 

The assassin’s motives for shooting Kennedy were undoubtedly linked to a wish to interfere with the president’s campaign to overthrow Castro’s government.  After the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy pledged to abandon efforts to overthrow Castro’s regime by force.  But the war of words between the two governments continued, and so did clandestine plots by the Kennedy administration to eliminate Castro by assassination.

Last, but not least, I have spoken to Cubans living in New Orleans in 1962–63 who got into heated arguments with Oswald over Cuba.  They will attest to the fact that Oswald was a “Castro-loving communist,” or exactly the kind of jerk who would kill the president of the U.S.

The right did not kill JFK.  The bloody communist did!

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Sidney Powell has expanded on the scope of the Dominion scam

By Andrea Widburg

During an interview with Glenn Beck, Sidney Powell offered some fascinating new insights into the claim that Dominion and Smartmatic voting systems have been used to engage in systematic election interference at home and abroad.  She also pushed back against media and NeverTrump claims that Trump’s legal team has no evidence to back up these charges.  [UPDATE: A stunning 14-minute interview with Howie Carr later in the day added more information and is embedded below the Glenn Beck interview.]

Of course, the lawyers do not have to give their proof to the media.  The media are just as capable of digging up the material.  Moreover, no lawyer should ever give the opponent (and that would be not just the Democrat party and Dominion, but the media as well) the entire case before going into court.  That’s an insane tactic.

In the interview, Powell explained some of the problems associated with giving the media a neat little package of evidence to take home with them, pick apart, and attack for Biden’s benefit:

Well, we will start putting documents online and sending them to people like you as soon as we possibly can. I would hope that we could start that by this weekend. I mean we’ve just been taking in information, not just through a fire hose. I mean, it started through a fire hose and then it became a tsunami. And some people, of course, don’t want their names disclosed. They have all kinds of fears. We have people around the country with security now that they’ve never had before just because they dared to tell the truth.


We’ve talked to probably over 500, or maybe even a thousand witnesses by now. I don’t even know what our affidavit count is. Rudy has one set and I have another, and then we share them with each other. So we haven’t even had time to read all the affidavits that our lawyers have collected.


In fact, we already have collected more evidence than probably half the prison population is imprisoned for right now. It’s just a matter of tying it together in a way that’s digestible, and we’re in the process of doing that as we speak.

Despite the obvious challenge of putting together effective evidentiary pleadings on such a grand scale within such a short time, Powell offered some important new information:

1. Dominion is going into hiding.  It bailed on an appearance before the Pennsylvania Legislature and is shutting down everywhere:

You might look at the fact that both of the Dominion offices have shut down and moved all of a sudden in Toronto where they shared office space with the Soros entity. And also in Denver, all of a sudden, they just shuttered and moved. Their employees have been taking their name off LinkedIn and eliminating any affiliation with either company. There are over a hundred of those that have happened.

2. Our government definitely seized those Scytl servers we talked about here:

Servers at Scytl in Germany were confiscated the other day. I am hearing it was our forces that got those servers, so I think the government is now working on an investigation of what really happened. But we’re getting in evidence also that there were lines into the servers from four foreign countries, all extremely adverse to the interests of the United States.

3. The Dominion system was built to shift and delete votes:

You can take votes and put them in a file called an “adjudicative file,” and then just throw it away. So you can call out all the Trump votes you want, put them in that file, and put it in the trash bin.  

4. This is a worldwide fraud, and Powell believes that “elected” governments around the world, not just in America, are in a panic that they’re going to be proven to have attained their offices through fraud — and our three-letter agencies may have been involved both abroad and domestically:

It has defied the will of the American people and people around the world who have thought they were legitimately voting and their vote was being counted for the candidate of their choice, when it turns out it wasn’t their choice at all. And I can’t even express how angry this makes me from whatever the involvement of our government is, to its failure to do anything now, to its promotion of it around the world or turning a blind eye — whatever it is, it’s absolutely hideous and appalling and un-American and contrary to everything our founders set this country up to be.

It’s a 15-minute interview and well worth your time:

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook