Month: September 2023

Recently I shared this tweet: “I was raised by nannies and daycares. It sucked. Have this memory of being like three and sitting inside my mom’s closet wrapped in her robe, smelling her smell, missing her so completely because she was gone on a work trip for weeks. Some sad sh+t. Don’t do that to your kids.”

The response and comments were overwhelming! I am going to share a few of them since God commands women to be “keepers at home” for many reasons so they don’t blaspheme His Word, and I believe this to be the main reason. Children need and want their mothers home full time. No one can take the place of a mother in a child’s life.

“I hardly remember what I did to cope with the loneliness. My mother was single since the coward of my father left her for another woman. I grew up in dire need of my mother. She worked all the time. I endured things as a child I should have never endured but I don’t blame her. I blame the coward that left her with all the responsibilities. My mother did the best she could. I chose to stay home and take care of my babies and to this day, I am a homemaker and homeschooler mom. I thank God for a husband that provides and that knows the importance of me staying home.”

“I wore mum’s robe to bed. For a brief time, I would eat with the fork she ate with (embarrassed by this one) but a couple of nights, I slept with her empty coke can next to my bed for comfort. She’s a wonderful mum. I just really needed her when I was a kid.”

“This was me as a kid. I desperately wanted my mom and it created this lifelong feeling of not being good enough. Each time I feel a tiny bit of rejection from people I love, it confirms what I’ve always felt growing up. Thankful my Creator took me in.”

“My mom worked full time when I was little and I have hardly any memories of her from that time. I can remember my babysitters and long days at the sitter, but nothing about my mom.”

“I remember multiple babysitters as our single mom worked. We were shut in closets or our room while they misbehaved.”

“My mom went back to work when I was eight and knowing how much it affected me and hearing my mom now in her 60s say that the biggest regret was leaving her kids to go back to work is the reason why I knew I wanted to stay home with my baby.” (My biggest regret was leaving my oldest for the first two years of her life since everyone told me this was what I was supposed to do. I knew it was so wrong.)

“My parents used to travel a lot and left us kids home with grandparents, and I was too young to understand it was just a trip. I thought they abandoned us, and I grew up having abandonment issues.”

“This is a common story. My mom had to work when I was a child and I spent a of time with grandparents. I grew up and became a teacher and saw so many children struggle with not having a mom at home. When I got married, we vowed not to let that happen to our children. I’ve since stayed home and now we homeschool. There is a sense of security that a mom being home brings to children.”

“This is true. My daughter said she used to fake sick at school just so she could see me. She missed me so much when I worked as I did night shift. This broke my heart. It truly did. I’m at home full time with my kids again. God’s word is Truth. I’m going to read this book (“The Way Home” by Mary Pride).

“I was the same. I had terrible separation anxiety and would fake being sick all the time so she would come home from work.”

“A core memory of mine: I remember waking up in the middle of the night. I knew my mom was gone at work so I went outside and sat on the porch. I guess I was waiting for her. I look at my children now and it breaks my heart thinking of them having to look for me.”

“I had to go to daycare one summer after my parents divorced. I hated it and can still remember bits and pieces of that summer. Later, a neighbor lady watched us. She had two kids who were younger and sweet to my little sister and me. Then we had a horrible teenage baby sitter who locked us outside many times and ignored us. Thankfully, my mom got remarried and was able to be home after school again by the time I was in middle school.”

“I remember screaming, crying, and begging my mom not to go to work. She had to as the breadwinner, but the damage was done. Anger, resentment, addiction, disassociation; all a result of trauma.”

“I was in daycare then aftercare most of my childhood. Didn’t see my mom till it was dark outside and about to go to sleep. Not the way it should be.”

“Being raised by a working mom is what made me want to stay home with mine.”

“I was blessed that my mom was a homemaker. I did, however, work in the daycare scene myself as an adult. Seriously, it’s AWFUL!”

“I remember getting dropped off at daycare at such a young age. It literally felt like I was being abandoned and I see it everyday now working at a daycare, especially with babies that are just starting. They have no concept or understanding of ‘mommy is coming back later.’ All they understand at the moment is that mom is leaving them behind. I’m thankful to understand how devastating that is for a child because I refuse to put my future children through this!”

“I remember crying into my nanny’s sofa as I waited for my mom to pick my up at 7 pm. I used to eat dinner at my nanny’s house. I often wondered why my parents had me because they were never around. There’s a big difference between having a baby and being a parent.”

“My mom was a single mom so we had a series of nannies, babysitters, and family members who essentially raised us. Some were quite mean and brutal. Mom hired whoever she could afford and whoever would take us. The one thing we wanted was to be with mom, but that’s the last thing we had.”

“I worked part-time in a daycare after school when I was a senior. I loved little kids and thought it would be fun to work with them, but it was so heartbreaking. Most of the kids were there for over ten hours. I overheard some parents telling their kids, “I can’t wait to put you into bed” as they were picking them up. We usually let them watch a show after the afternoon nap and they were always fighting over who could sit on my lap. It was heartbreaking to know they just wanted a warm hug and snuggles, but there was only one of me and twelve kids. I could truly go on all day. Kids need their mom!”

“All the complaining women that think they’re excused from being obedient to the Word of God is just another example of the great falling away. Those that disagree with The Word because they want MORE, more of this world. As a homeschooling mother of eight Blessings, we did WITHOUT so much to raise up our children in the way they should go, giving them incredible childhoods based on loving parents and based on the fact that they CAME FIRST after The Lord. The Husband/Wife relationship was next and they were next. This cost us sacrifice, yes, it was sacrificial, but it was also incredibly BLESSED to be able to spend all our years of raising children, not handing them off as if training them up isn’t OUR RESPONSIBILITY to THE LORD. We’re called to help our children so that they won’t forsake their mother’s teaching, so that when their fathers and mothers are seen as Godly Dedicated Parents, the Word of God would not be maligned! Disagree? Take it up with GOD.”

Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.
Isaiah 49:15

https://thetransformedwife.com/children-being-abandoned-by-their-mothers/

#1) Comment on consent calendar.

Ryan Messano of Messanonews.com

I find it incredible that my hand was raised during the consent calendar and i wasn’t Called on, but all the GDL controlled opposition was called on. First, I oppose racial slurs and profanity, and I reject and denounce all these callers using these disgusting and deliberate tactics to try to hide the truth being told.

I agree that profanity and racial slurs be censored. They aren’t protected by the First Amendment, neither is porn. Even though I think the mayor is incompetent and inept at best, I agree with him censoring profanity and racial slurs. Now, if only the mayor would censor criticism of Whites, not just criticism of his own religion, which he doesn’t even follow. Mayor only censors profanity against him, not from his supporters, showing he has no principles and is a moral midget.

Second, the public should be able to comment on presentations. The government doesn’t get to pick presentations, then shield them from all criticism. I’m not wasting my time in public comment to address this, when we ought to have had the time after the presentation.

Since no opportunity to address the presentations by the public was given, since the City Council and Mayor don’t think public input is important; as they demonstrate by putting public comment dead last at meetings, and giving speakers a lousy two minutes, I’ll do it now.

On hip hop, I listened to it as an kid too, though thankfully my parents didn’t have a television and stopped us from listening to mostly corrupt music and watching television and movies, all controlled by, well, if I say it, the Mayor will have a temper tantrum, so I’ll let the hearer fill in the blanks. My website tells the truth.

However, while many of us enjoyed it, and some were involved and have happy memories, we need to zoom out. In the 1960’s, we had Lyndon Baines Johnson, who lost of us know as LBJ, pass his disastrous “War on Poverty” after he got into office with JFK’s assassination, this war on poverty was a catastrophe for the black community as it incentivized black women to get on welfare and to kick the black man out of the home. This led to an explosion in black fatherless rates from 10% in 1940 to 75% as im speaking. Hip hop was introduced into the black community right after LBJ’s war on poverty kicked out the black man, so young and vulnerable boys and girls had no men to protect them from the invasion of hip hops emphasis on crime, drugs, and promiscuity. Zooming out, there are no positive impacts on

The black community or America from hip hop, movies, or television.

In addition, 75% of black boys are functionally illiterate. The leading factors contributing to criminality, regardless of race, are fatherlessness and functional illiteracy which hip hop has only served to cause to explode.

So, we shouldn’t be celebrating hip hop, facts don’t care about feelings, and it’s shameful our leaders nearly every week celebrate some other emotional agenda, they have more planned for the future, and fail to do their homework. Good leaders are wise and aren’t easily deceived.

#2) Comment on police receiving militarized weaponry.

This is Ryan Messano of Messanonews.com

I don’t know why a commission paid for by the government gets more time to speak than American citizens. Another clever ploy by the Sacramento mayor and city council to push their agenda and to silence and drown out truth. Anyone who is paid, is going to find the results the people paying them want them to find. And Keyon Bliss shouldn’t be on the commission, he’s a race baiting, rabble rousing, grossly ignorant speaker of nonsense. Further proof of the mayors corruption,. He immediately censors criticism of certain religions, but allows corrupt Bliss more time.

Anyone commenting on this or listening is advised to read “War on Cops” by Heather Macdonald, which shatters the “Police are racist” narrative. Further why is it that I constantly hear comments and anecdotes about how police are racist; which aren’t supported by any objective statistics at all, but never hear these people talk about the crime, especially murder, rape, and violent crime.

I’m opposed to military equipment for the police. Yes, we do have a crime explosion, nationwide, caused by government policies that attack the family. Go to any prison, and no matter race, you’ll find the vast majority of criminals are men, and 90% of these male convicted prisoners were raised without a married father and are functionally illiterate, I have heard this council talk for hundreds of hours, and I haven’t heard you discuss the root problems of the crime problem once. Halfway to fixing a problem is acknowledging you have a problem, how can you fix a problem if you won’t identify it and the solutions.

Why has our rape rate gone from 9 women per 100,000 in 1960, to officially 40 rapes per 100,000, and actually it’s closer to 100 rapes per 100,000 women, because police are cooking the books and many women are afraid to report it. Dysfunctional families.

Police overreach is dangerous, and the police arresting people for not wearing masks and getting vaccines is dangerous constitutional overreach.

#3) Matters not on agenda

Anyone not agree that no race and no religion is above criticism?

Let’s discuss history. My website is Messanonews.com. By learning the past we will understand who is behind all of todays chaos. And let’s keep an open mind. It’s very likely the group screaming the loudest, and desperately trying to Silence legitimate criticism is the culprit behind every evil Agenda in America today. The apostle Paul told us, 2,000 years ago, in 1 Thessalonians chapter 2 verses 14-15, who was behind evil agendas in his day, and nothing has changed in 2,000 years.

1910, 6 men representing a quarter of the worlds wealth met at Jekyll iskand, GA, secretly, and planned the Creation of the Federal Reserve and income tax. This is detailed in the excellent book, “The Creature from Jekyll island”. Kindly don’t research this with Google searches or Wikipedia searches, as bankers control the information online, and algorithms.

1912, bankers funded Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, so, this caused Teddy Roosevelt to split the 60% Republican vote with Taft, allowing Wilson to sneak in the White House with 40% of the vote. Wilson’s White House handler for the bankers,, Edward Mandell House, anonymous wrote a book “Philip Dru Administrator” in 1912, detailing how a small group of men can run the world. Wasting no time, the bankers passed the 16th and 17th Amendments in 1913, which were the income tax and direct election of senators, along with the Federal Reserve.

Once the bankers had control of the Americas money with the Federal Reserve and income tax, they immediately triggered World War 1 in 1914, having Freemason Gavrilo Princip murder the archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. Much more to be revealed, but I’ll end by saying they arranged the murder of the Tsar of Russia and his entire family in 1918, in the worlds biggest robbery, as the Tsar was worth nearly $1 trillion in todays money, not counting land and jewels. Of the early Bolshevik Russian leaders, 300 were Jewish, only 12 were Russian. 40 million Russians were then murdered.

WEF mouthpiece Yuval Harari says artificial intelligence will make people redundant but he really means the goyim.  Jewish jokes suggest many of the “Chosen” have always regarded the goyim as squatters. (Most Jews are assimilated and don’t hold these views.) The goyim have gladly volunteered to collaborate in their own extinction. (Freemasonry, Communism, Feminism, diversity, gender dysphoria, migration, abortion, CRT, BLM.) Are the goyim stupid? Q:  Why were Gentiles invented? A:  Somebody has to pay retail. 
Jokes suggest some Jews think the worldwas created for them alone, and goyim to serve them.

from March 26, 2013by Henry Makow PhD 

Recently, I read some jokes meant for Jewish eyes only. They came from a Chapter “Jacob and Esau” in “Jewish Wit and Wisdom” published in 1952. Many reflected the traditional Jewish-Gentile relationship down through the centuries. 

Two Jews, one from London and one from a small shtetl (village) in Poland met at a spa in Germany. The Londoner asked his Polish friend how many Jews were in his village. 700. And how many goyim? 45. And what do the Jews do? They are artisans shopkeepers and traders. And the goyim?  “They make themselves useful to the Jews. They sweep out the stores and on Sabbath make the fires and remove the candlesticks.” 

Then, it was the Pole’s turn. On learning, there were 200,000 Jews in London, and seven million goyim, he quite rightly inquired, “Why do you need so many goyim?”
This story nicely illustrates the parochial quality of many Jews. Is it good or bad for the Jews? is a common reflex. Call it a “self-referential” quality, where the world revolves around them, and they create reality according to their prejudices and self-interest. (Is it a coincidence that the mass media and Hollywood are dominated by these “reality-creators?” And they have used this power to divert gentiles from the diabolical Judeo-Masonic conspiracy?) This Jewish “solipsism” now passes as “Modernism.”  

In his book, Sex and Character(1903), the Jewish philosopher Otto Weininger, left, labeled it “subjectivity” and compared Jews with some women, saying neither are able to see situations in terms of objective morality. Everything is a reflection of their emotion, vanity, and self-interest. Have you noticed that people, in general, are becoming more selfish and self-centered as Christian influence fades? 

GOD

The following joke (from Wikipedia) illustrates that Judaism may be deficient as a religion. You cannot have religion without God. Judaism, which is defined by Cabalism, is in fact a satanic cult. 

Two Rabbis argued late into the night about the existence of God, and, using strong arguments from the scriptures, ended up indisputably disproving His existence. The next day, one Rabbi was surprised to see the other walking into the Shul for morning services. “I thought we had agreed there was no God,” he said. “Yes, what does that have to do with it?” replied the other.

Many observers have noted that Judaism is about empty observance and conformity rather than a living relationship with God. Arthur Koestler famously said, “Judaism teaches Jews how to cheat God.” The following stories suggest some Jews think God is a wily businessman they cannot outfox.   This is from Wikipedia.

A poor man walking in the forest feels close enough to God to ask, “God, what is a million years to you?
God replies, “My son, a million years to you is like a second to me.”
The man asks, “God, what is a million dollars to you?”
God replies, “My son, a million dollars to you is less than a penny to me. It means almost nothing to me.
The man asks, “So God, can I have a million dollars?”
And God replies, “In a second.”

Another joke emphasized the view that Jews are smarter than others.

A rich man left his fortune to his three friends, an Irishman, a German, and a Jew. The only stipulation was that each had to put a $100 bill in his coffin just before it was lowered into the ground. At the funeral, the Irishman and the German both gladly fulfilled their obligation. Then it was the Jew’s turn. He picked up the two hundred dollar bills and left a cheque for $300 in the coffin!  

I found this last one (from the book, p.361) quite shocking:

A Jew buys a lottery ticket and goes to the synagogue where he promises God that he will donate a new scroll if he wins. When he fails to win, he exclaims “The Jewish God is no businessman,” and goes to the Christian church where he promises to pay for a new roof. 

He wins a large prize but welches on his promise. Instead, he returns to the synagogue where he praises the Jewish God in these terms: “You knew all along that I won’t keep my promise so you ignored me. But the Christian God naively believed me. After all, there is no God like the Jewish God.”

These stories suggest that some Jews have created God in their own image. They are their own God.  Unfortunately, they have become ours.   

—
Related: 

Makow – The Jewish Banker Conspiracy – 

———- The Illuminati Reality Bubble 

——–  How Kulture is Contrived

——— Jews and the Devil 

——–  Confessions of an Ex-Luciferian Jew

NPR Can’t Stop Talking About Jews 

Watch Obama Pay Tribute to Zionist Gods (Bro Nataniel)

https://www.henrymakow.com

Image Source – Pixbay Free Content

On June 6, Tucker Carlson, America’s most-watched TV pundit, launched a new show on Twitter. No longer reined in by Fox News executives, Carlson was free to ask a big, explosive question: “What exactly happened on 9/11?” He answered himself: “Well, it’s still classified.”

A few months earlier, Carlson had appeared on Clayton Morris’s podcast and brought up World Trade Center Building 7, widely viewed as the Achilles heel of the official story of 9/11:

“If you say, like, ‘What actually happened with building 7? Like that is weird, right? It doesn’t—like, what is that?’… If you were to say something like that on television, they’d flip out. You’d, like, lose your job over that. It’s an attack on my country. Can I ask? I don’t really understand. Do buildings actually collapse? No, they—maybe they do. I don’t know. But, like, why can’t I ask questions about that?”

Carlson’s words betray his cognitive dissonance. “Do buildings actually collapse (like that)? No, they—maybe they do.” He almost blurts out the obvious truth—“no, they don’t”—before correcting himself with the (possibly sarcastic) “maybe they do. I don’t know.”

Carlson built his career by cultivating a reputation for straight talk, unfazed by political correctness. But as he suggests, straight talk about 9/11 in general, and WTC-7 in particular, is unwelcome in today’s USA. In mainstream media, even asking questions in unacceptable.

Why can’t we ask questions about Building 7? Because the answers are all-too-obvious—and all-too-embarrassing to the rulers of the intertwined American and Israeli empires.

World Trade Center Building 7, a 47-story high-rise, collapsed into its own footprint at 5:21 pm on September 11, 2001, seven hours after the Twin Towers were destroyed. Numerous witnesses reported police and emergency personnel announcing that WTC-7 was about to come down. Seconds before it fell, witnesses overheard a countdown to demolition (“five-four-three-two-one”) on police radio, followed by the massive explosion that precipitated the “collapse.”

The building fell at absolute free-fall for the first two-and-a-half seconds, and near-free-fall thereafter. That means that all of WTC-7’s vertical supports had somehow been simultaneously and completely removed. The only known mechanism that can do that is professionally-prepared-and-timed explosives.

The obvious controlled demolition of Building 7 threw a monkey wrench into the US government’s official 9/11 narrative. WTC-7 had been one of the most important buildings in America. It housed the CIA’s second-largest headquarters after Langley, Virginia, as well as the Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission with its Enron files, the Internal Revenue Service, and many of America’s biggest corporate heavy hitters. What’s more, WTC-7’s 23^rd floor was the home of New York’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM), where the local and federal governments would manage their joint response to any major disaster—like 9/11.

The OEM response to 9/11 should have been run from the 23^rd floor of WTC-7. But it wasn’t. Why not? In an ABC-TV interview with Peter Jennings conducted on the morning of 9/11, then-NYC-mayor Rudy Giuliani provided the answer: “We were told the World Trade Center was going to collapse,” so they moved to an alternate site. Giuliani’s confession of foreknowledge of the unprecedented and vanishingly improbable “collapse” of the Twin Towers raises the question of why the 343 firefighters who died on 9/11 didn’t get the same warning.

Giuliani wasn’t the only one with foreknowledge of a “building collapse” on 9/11. Both the BBC and CNN reported WTC-7’s “collapse” before it happened.

Though Building 7 was an obvious controlled implosion, it couldn’t be acknowledged. Obviously the none-too-competent alleged hijackers blamed for 9/11 were not plausible suspects in the highly professional implosion of one of the most secure buildings in America.

For seven years, the feds stalled and obfuscated. A 2002 FEMA report sidestepped WTC-7, admitting that any hypothesis the authors could imagine (not including the unthinkable one, demolition) had “only a low probability of occurrence.” The 9/11 Commission Report, issued in 2004, did not even mention the destruction of the WTC-7. Network TV imposed a blackout on footage of its “collapse.”

Finally, in 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released its long-overdue report on WTC-7. According to the authors, a hitherto-unknown physical phenomenon, “thermal expansion,” had caused a beam to unseat itself, magically removing all of the building’s vertical support and setting off 2.5 seconds of absolute free-fall followed by about five seconds of near-free-fall.

The NIST report, of course, is ludicrous. For details, watch the film Seven featuring University of Alaska professor Leroy Hulsey, who led a detailed computer simulation of the building’s destruction.

But we didn’t really need to wait for Hulsey’s report. Just listen to Larry Silverstein, the close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu who bought the World Trade Center two months before 9/11, doubled the insurance, and fortuitously skipped his usual breakfast at the top of the North Tower that morning. In the PBS documentary America Rebuilds, broadcast in 2002, Silverstein confesses to “pulling” (i.e. demolishing) Building 7. He later collected roughly three-quarters of a billion dollars in insurance money on that very building, along with four billion for the rest of the World Trade Center—the fruits of his bizarre double indemnity claim that he had suffered two completely separate and unrelated terrorist attacks from the two planes.

The obvious fact that the authorities lied and are still lying about Building 7 raises the question of what else are they lying about—and points to the only slightly less-obvious demolitions of the Twin Towers. Like Building 7, the Twin Towers disappeared at near-free-fall acceleration into the path of most resistance, indicating that they too had had all of their vertical supports taken out with synchronic precision. Just as the sudden demise of Building 7 cannot be plausibly blamed on a few minor office fires of undetermined origin, the likewise sudden, symmetrical, and complete destructions of Towers 1 and 2 cannot possibly have been the result of random damage caused by relatively modest office fires kindled by kerosene (jet fuel).

But the Towers were “overkilled” in unconventional explosive demolitions quite unlike the implosion of Building 7. Indeed, so much explosive force was used to pulverize the Towers that most of the contents of the buildings,including more than 1100 human bodies, were apparently vaporized into nothingness. And of the 1,640-odd victims who did leave at least a sliver of fingernail or a splinter of bone to be recovered by the most meticulous sifting-and-bucketing operation in history, many were blasted to smithereens, leaving only a few bone fragments to be recovered years later from the rooftops of neighboring buildings: “For example, a search in 2010 found 76 more fragments of remains on the roof of the 40-story Deutsche Bank building 250 feet from the South Tower. Previously, over 750 human bone fragments, each less than a half-inch long, were collected from this roof.”* How the massively explosive destruction of the two Towers, and the vaporization of its occupants and their office equipment, could ever have been mistaken for a natural gravity-driven collapse is one of those mysteries that will leave future historians scratching their heads.

The explosive destruction of the World Trade Center, conducted in such a way that it could be (quasi-)plausibly blamed on plane crashes and fires, required immense amounts of money and expertise, as well as insider access to the buildings. One often-overlooked requirement was that the perpetrators, who had invested so much in their elaborate demolition plans, would have needed to be 100% certain that planes would hit the buildings to provide a pretext for the demolitions. So they could not have simply allowed radical hijackers to attempt to seize control of planes and try to fly them into the Towers. The odds of successful plane-into-building hits, given that there had been no successful hijackings in the US for decades, would have been near zero. So, the perpetrators must have controlled the aviation aspect of 9/11, presumably by flying planes into targets by remote control. That would explain why there is no evidence that any alleged hijackers were even on board the alleged attack planes, and abundant evidence to the contrary.

Obviously powerful insiders were responsible. The question is, which insiders?**

The short answer, to which most students of the issue would agree, is “the neoconservatives.” Fanatically loyal to Israel, and desperate to turn the US military against their Muslim enemies, the authors of Rebuilding America’s Defenses(September 2000) famously announced that their yearned-for “process of transformation … is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event–like a new Pearl Harbor.”

9/11 was the neocons’ new Pearl Harbor. 9/11’s shocking imagery and 2000+ casualties closely resembled the original 1941 Pearl Harbor attack, whose psychological impact transformed an 80%-antiwar opinion into an angry hornets’ nest of warmongers. But 9/11 was not merely designed to launch the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, or even the destruction of “seven countries in five years.” Its less-obvious but more important purpose was to implant Islamophobia deeply and permanently into the western subconscious mind. By equating Islam with terrorism, 9/11 hoodwinked the west into viewing Israel’s enemies as its own. The 9/11-triggered Islamophobia epidemic will probably continue to fester and spread for decades to come. Indeed, it will likely outlast the zionist entity itself.

But despite PNAC’s prognostications, 9/11 failed to contribute to the establishment of a “new American century.” Though the US military was successfully hijacked and turned against Israel’s enemies, the cost to the empire itself was astronomical, not only in terms of dollars but also in reputation and soft power.

While the US was bogged down in West Asia, fighting countries it should have befriended, peer competitors Russia and China arose to challenge America’s imperial dominance, and the BRICS alliance emerged heralding a multipolar world. When the dust settles, it is likely that 9/11 will be seen to have hastened the demise of the US empire by two or three decades. And the zionist entity, too, will soon be relegated to the proverbial dustbin of history, 9/11 or no 9/11.

So, the whole murderous hoax—a vivid display of the evil men are capable of—will turn out to be futile. As the Qur’an tells us, “They plot and Allah plans; and Allah is the best of planners.”

—

*WTC Bone Fragments Still Surface a Decade After 9/11

https://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/596-wtc-bone-fragments-still-surface-a-decade-after-911.html

**Two notable books that offer somewhat different lists of likely perpetrators are Christopher Bollyn’s Solving 9/11, which focuses on the billionaire zionist oligarchs who privatized the World Trade Center shortly before 9/11 alongside their Mossad accomplices; and Kevin Ryan’s Another 19, offering an alternative list of suspected Deep State operatives with the means, motive, and opportunity to have contributed to one or more aspects of the crimes of 9/11.

https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/9-11-22-years-later-will-we-ever-get-the-truth/

By Henry Makow Ph.D.  | March 18, 2002 
 

“In the 1960’s, the elite media invented second-wave feminism as part of the elite agenda to dismantle civilization and create a New World Order.” 

Since writing these words last week, I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings.  She became a media darling due to her CIA connections.  MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.

Steinem has tried to suppress this information, unearthed in the 1970’s by a radical feminist group called “Red Stockings.” In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in “Feminist Revolution.” Nevertheless the story appeared in the “Village Voice” on May 21, 1979. 

Steinem has always pretended that she had been a student radical. “When I was in college, it was the McCarthy era,” she told Susan Mitchell in 1997, “and that made me a Marxist.” (Icons, Saints and Divas: Intimate Conversations with Women who Changed the World 1997. p 130) Her bio-blurb in June 1973 MS. Magazine states: “Gloria Steinem has been a freelance writer all her professional life. Ms magazine is her first full-time salaried job.” 

Not true. Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan’s alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a “Chester Bowles Student Fellowship” to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it. 

In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA’s Cord Meyers to direct an “informal group of activists” called the “Independent Research Service.” This was part of Meyer’s “Congress for Cultural Freedom,” which created magazines like “Encounter” and “Partisan Review” to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots. 

One of Steinem’s CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960’s, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for women’s lib. In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, he hired her as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine’s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy’s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the cream of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA. 

Steinem’s personal relationships also belie her anti establishment pretensions. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, credited with stalling FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In the 1980’s, she dated Henry Kissinger. For more details, see San Francisco researcher Dave Emory. 

Our main misconception about the CIA is that it serves US interests. In fact, it has always been the instrument of a dynastic international banking and oil elite (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) coordinated by the Royal Institute for Internal Affairs in London and their US branch, the Council for Foreign Relations. It was established and peopled by blue bloods from the New York banking establishment and graduates of Yale University’s secret pagan “Skull and Bones” society. Our current President, his father and grandfather fit this profile. 

The agenda of this international cabal is to degrade the institutions and values of the United States in order to integrate it into a global state that it will direct through the United Nations. In its 1947 Founding Charter, the CIA is prohibited from engaging in domestic activities. However this has never stopped it from waging a psychological war on the American people. The domestic counterpart of the “Congress for Cultural Freedom” was the “American Committee for Cultural Freedom.” Using foundations as conduits, the CIA controlled intellectual discourse in the 1950’s and 1960’s, and I believe continues to do so today. In “The Cultural Cold War,” Francis Stonor Saunders estimates that a thousand books were produced under the imprint of a variety of commercial and university presses, with covert subsidies. 

The CIA’s “Project Mockingbird” involved the direct infiltration of the corporate media, a process that often included direct takeover of major news outlets. “By the early 1950’s,” writes Deborah Davis, in her book “Katherine the Great,” the CIA owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all.” In 1982 the CIA admitted that reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to agents in the field. Philip Graham, publisher of the Washington Post, who ran the operation until his “suicide” in 1963, boasted that “you could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple of hundred dollars a month.” 

I was born in 1949. Idealists in my parent’s generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a shill for a brutal despotism. My own generation may discover that our best instincts have also been manipulated and exploited. There is evidence that the 60’s drug counter culture, the civil rights movement, and anti-war movement, like feminism, were CIA directed. For example, the CIA has admitted setting up the (National Student Association as a front in 1947 http://www.cia-on-campus.org/nsa/nsa2.html). In the early 1950’s the NSA opposed the attempts of the House Un American Activities Committee to root out Communist spies. According to Phil Agee Jr., NSA officers participated in the activities of SNCC, the militant civil rights group, and Students for a Democratic Society, a radical peace group.

According to Mark Riebling, the CIA also may have used Timothy Leary. Certainly the agency distributed LSD to Leary and other opinion makers in the 1960s. Leary made a generation of Americans turn away from active participation in society and seek fulfillment “within.” In another example of the CIA’s use of drugs to interfere in domestic politics, Gary Webb describes how in the 1980’s, the CIA flooded Black ghettos with cocaine. 

I won’t attempt to analyze the CIA’s motivation except to suggest what they have in common: They demoralized, alienated and divided Americans. The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world. Thus, we don’t realize who the real enemy is. For the same reason, the CIA and elite foundations also fund the diversity and multicultural movements.

Feminism has done the most damage. There is no more fundamental yet delicate relationship in society than male and female. On it depends the family, the red blood cell of society. Nobody with the interests of society at heart would try to divide men and women. Yet the lie that men have exploited women has become the official orthodoxy. 

Man loves woman. His first instinct is to nurture (“husband”) and see her thrive. When a woman is happy, she is beautiful. Sure, some men are abusive. But the vast majority have supported and guided their families for millennium. 

Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female characteristics, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere “stereotypes.” This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. Lesbians like Rosie O’Donnell are advanced as role models. 

All of this is calculated to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) The American woman has been hoodwinked into investing herself in a mundane career instead of the timeless love of her husband and children. Many women have become temperamentally unfit to be wives and mothers. People, who are isolated and alone, stunted and love-starved, are easy to fool and manipulate. Without the healthy influence of two loving parents, so are their children. 

Feminism is a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by its governing elite. It is designed to weaken the American social and cultural fabric in order to introduce a friendly fascist New World Order. Its advocates are sanctimonious charlatans who have grown rich and powerful from it. They include a whole class of liars and moral cripples who work for the elite in various capacities: government, education and the media. These imposters ought to be exposed and ridiculed. 

Women’s oppression is a lie. Sex roles were never as rigid as feminists would have us believe. My mother had a successful business in the 1950’s importing watchstraps from Switzerland. When my father’s income increased, she was content to quit and concentrate on the children. Women were free to pursue careers if they wanted to. The difference was that their role as wife and mother was understood, and socially validated, as it should be. 

Until Gloria Steinem and the CIA came along.

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Feminism/gloria_steinem-feminism.htm

Shannon Harris was married to Joshua Harris who wrote “I Kissed Dating Goodbye” who has left his marriage and his faith. She has come out with a book. I read an article with an interview from her and I want to point out a few things.

Before I begin, you can NOT live out biblical womanhood without knowing and loving Jesus Christ as your personal Savior. You can fake it and even for a long time, but you will always feel like a hypocrite and eventually feel like you are missing out. Living for Christ is not easy. It takes a sacrificial life; one in obedience to Jesus Christ and out of a deep love and appreciation for Him and what He’s done for you. Biblical womanhood is not going the way of the world. In fact, it’s going contrary to the world and you can’t keep going without His Spirit working mightily within you.

Shannon Harris tried living a biblical womanhood lifestyle without a deep love for Christ and commitment to Him. How do I know? Listen to what she had to say in the interview.

“Every single part of my life was consumed and directed by the church. I liken myself to Alice in Wonderland; I think I’m just going to peek my head in and see what the church is all about, and then suddenly I tumble headlong into this other world, a place where things seem really amazing, but they also don’t always make sense. I’m told who to be, and who to become. I get married and I have a family, and then it all starts to crumble. The remainder of the book is me trying to make sense of things until I’m finally back home in myself.”

She tried living out biblical womanhood but found out that it wasn’t what she wanted. She did it because she was supposed to do it.

“My church and their brand of churches interpreted the creation story very literally. God created Adam, and then Eve. Women are second. God created Eve from Adam’s rib, so she’s not her own person. She’s been made from a piece of Adam. God gives Eve the job of Adam’s helper. She didn’t have her own purpose. And then, Eve is curious. She listens to the serpent and she trusts herself, and she becomes wise, and that’s seen as bad. She gets punished for her wisdom.”

Yes, God created Eve second. This doesn’t mean women are inferior. Yes, God created Eve from Adam’s rib, but this doesn’t mean she’s not her own person nor a piece of Adam. Yes, God created Eve as Adam’s help meet and yes, this was her purpose. Then she seems to agree with and support Eve:

“…she trusts herself…”

“…she becomes wise and that’s seen as bad”

“She gets punished for her wisdom.”

She’s twisting Scripture to support her own evil agenda in order to justify her rebellion towards God by making Eve look like what she did was good.

“This theology puts a man in a higher place in the hierarchy. And it’s a male operating system. It’s run so men can succeed. So when I walked into my church, I learned my wisdom was faulty. My emotions and feelings are not to be trusted, and they’re not really true. On top of that, you have women being shamed for their bodies or their sexualities, constantly having to cover up to avoid tempting a man. All of these things together can damage a woman’s attunement to her body. What makes it so dangerous is that her alarm systems can be silenced and/or dismissed.”

Yes, man does have a higher place in the hierarchy. Feminists like her HATE this!!! They want to be in control and run the world. They don’t like God’s order and believe they know better. Yes, it’s run so men can succeed and women can flourish in their homes being protected and provided by men! She doesn’t get this part. She plays the victim as all of the false teachers like her do.

Then she believes that women should be ruled by their emotions and feelings rather than by Truth. This is why Eve was deceived and why Shannon is deceived. Women need Truth. Shamed for their bodies and sexuality and need to cover up? Who shames women for their bodies? Yes, they’re exhorted in God’s Word to be modest, discreet, and shamefaced (not draw attention to oneself). God knows that men are visual. She does too, but she wants to dress and act as she pleases with no boundaries on her sexuality or modesty as many women do these day. They mock God rather than obey Him.

Women are created by God. He gave them beautiful roles and responsibilities. Shannon won’t find the happiness and fulfillment she’s looking for in the world. She can’t without knowing and loving the God who created her. Many women are like her. They tried to find happiness and fulfillment by doing everything right but without knowing God and His love for them, so they fall away into error. They’re doing it without His Spirit working mightily within them. Yes, it’s hard! Yes, it’s hard being sexually pure until marriage and then be a godly, submissive wife to your husband with a meek and quiet spirit, but it’s good. All of God’s ways are good. It’s the only path to be on, women.

Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.
Jeremiah 6:16

https://thetransformedwife.com/shannon-harris-kissed-biblical-womanhood-goodbye/

https://www.the-sun.com/news/8985991/inside-town-banned-kids-from-mobile-phones/

One town banned kids from having cell phones. A very smart idea. Parents giving kids a cell phone under age 18 is child abuse.

The kids cannot handle it. They are being set up for failure.

Whenever I write about almost anything, especially women being keepers at home and submitting to their husbands in everything, I undoubtedly receive a ton of questions concerning the exceptions; all of the “what ifs.” I have been pondering this a lot recently and there is no perfect answer for every exception. Each situation and circumstance is unique. This is why the godly, older women need to step up and be available to the women with the exceptions to guide them in the right way.

Let’s take women being keepers at home. What if a husband wants her to be in the workforce? What is she to do? What if she is lazy and doesn’t clean her home but sits around all day watching TV or running around spending money? I can see why a husband would want her to be in the workforce. What if he wants her to work to help his drug or alcohol addiction or even buy more toys for him? Then what? I would encourage her to not leave her home for the workforce and explain to her husband that the Lord wants her in her home caring for her children and home. If your husband simply wants you to help bring in income, figure how much money you’ll actually bring in after taxes and the cost of being in the workforce. Show him studies of the importance of mothers being home to raise their children, then pray diligently.

What about women submitting to their husbands? No, they should never submit to anal sex, watching porn with him, physical abuse, or anything wicked like these. What if he wants her to dress sexually? Is she to obey him? No, but she can dress to please him in a feminine way. She doesn’t need to dress like the Amish and all covered up. She can show her curves but not show too much flesh, too tight, too low, or too short. Some men want their wives to wear bikinis. No, she doesn’t have to submit to this in public since this is like going out in her bra and underwear. God’s will will always trump her husband’s will in matters such as this.

What about homeschooling versus public schooling, vaccinations, circumcision, sleep training, family bed, raising and disciplining the children, how many children, the food you feed your family, and so many other issues that aren’t necessarily sin issues but you have strong convictions about? Talk to your husband about them. Try to reason with him. But in the end, you must submit to him even if you feel strongly about a certain issue. He is the one who will be held responsible for how he led his family. You will be held responsible for submitting to your husband.

As you can see, there is no pat answer for every exception. This is why it’s wise to seek godly wisdom from older women. In the end, however, you must do everything you can to obey the Lord and live in obedience to your husband. This is His will for you and makes for peace in your home.

Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
Ephesians 5:22-24

https://thetransformedwife.com/answering-all-of-the-exceptions/

Left, David Rockefeller and Zhou Enlai and chamber pot in 1973.

The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, 
but embrace the NWO because they think they are in control. 

“By studying the triumvirate Chinese elite and their intimate ties to the Illuminati, it is clear that modern China is an Illuminati creation.”

(From Feb 13, 2012)
by St. John Bartholomew      
(henrymakow.com) 

Beijing –The Chinese elite is a merger between the Communist leadership, Hong Kong tycoons, and the criminal Triads. All three factions derive derive their power from Illuminati collaboration.

China has appeared autonomous because the Illuminati developed the country internally, funding ‘revolutionary’ political parties spouting nationalist slogans. The reasoning was that the Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.

Lord Bertrand Russell revealed this plan in a report on China published in 1920:

‘Out of the renaissance spirit now existing in China, it is possible, if foreign nations can be prevented from wreaking havoc, to develop a new civilization better than any that the world has yet known.’

The fascist superpower we know today was created in the second half of the 20th century by the bogus Cold War dialectic of communism vs. capitalism.

The stage was set in 1898 when Britain and China signed a contract stipulating that Hong Kong would be handed back to the Chinese in 1997. This meant that the fierce Communism of the mainland and laissez faire capitalism of Hong Kong were always destined to merge.

The process of unification gave rise to the current China power elite. What follows is background of the three main factions.

THE COMMUNIST LEADERSHIP

Because Communism is an Illuminati creation, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are by definition, Illuminati agents.

Mao was a Soviet agent. (Mao-The Untold Story, Chang & Halliday, p.49.) 
He was a product of the Yale in China  “Missionary” i.e. OSS, Skull & Bones program.

The CCP implemented policies that set the foundations for an Illuminati super state. They unified the country, attacked traditional Chinese culture, instigated industrialization programs and created a common language.

Wang Hao, a historian at the China Institute of International Studies, has recorded that Mao’s deputy Zhou Enlai met David Rockefeller in June 1973:

‘When meeting David Rockefeller, Zhou said to him that it was necessary to find appropriate methods conducive to the development of the trade between two sides under different political systems.’

The corporate-communist merger began when Deng Xiaoping came to power in the late 1970s and introduced his market reforms with the slogan “to get rich is glorious.” 

However, after 30 years of Maoism his regime was hopelessly ill equipped to run a market economy. They turned to the wealthiest Chinese tycoons in Hong Kong for guidance.

THE HONG KONG TYCOONS

The most powerful HK tycoon is Li Ka-Shing, the richest Asian in the world and an Illuminati insider.

Other prominent tycoons are ‘HK’s godfather of real estate’ Henry Fok, ‘The king of gambling’ Stanley Ho and the man who would be chosen by Beijing to head Hong Kong after the departure of the British, Tung Chee-Wa.

It is important to realize that these men rose to power and prestige in a British colony, i.e. they were vetted by the City of London to be colonial leaders. This is illustrated by the rise of Li Ka Shing.

As HK developed, Li emerged as the most brilliant Chinese entrepreneur. The ‘Brotherhood bankers’ of Hong Kong became aware of his mercantile genius and brought him into the fold. 

In 1979 Li took control of Hutchinson Whampoa, one of the old British companies that had long dominated Hong Kong’s economy. Companies of such political importance are not given away casually. In 2000, the Queen awarded Li the title of ‘Knight (Commander of the Order) of the British Empire.’

In the early eighties, the tycoons and the communists had a series of meetings in Beijing. They struck a deal whereby the tycoons advised and educated the Chinese authorities about markets and in return Beijing gave them privileged access to their vast economic basin. In 1984 the two groups founded CITIC, the organization that managed China’s transition to market economy.

THE TRIADS

The Triads is a collective term for the secret societies and criminal groups that originated in 18th century China with the aim to bring down the Qing dynasty.

For over a century the Illuminati waged war against the Qing dynasty. The Triads were their vehicle for subversion and revolution, in a similar fashion to Freemasonry in Western revolutions.

For instance, during the opium wars, the Triads helped bring the drug into China. The revolutionary Nationalist Government that toppled the Qing dynasty in 1912 was a coalition of triad groups. Sun Yat-sen, the man who led the nationalist coalition that toppled the Qing in 1912, was a Triad member and was trained and armed in British Hong Kong. Chiang Kai-shek was also a Triad member.

When the Communists achieved dominance in 1949 they kicked the Triads out of the country. They fled mainly to Hong Kong and Taiwan to re-build. Chiang Kai-shek continued to publicly receive US funding.

Today the Triads are best known as the world’s largest criminal entity, involved in drug trafficking, prostitution, money laundering etc. They exist in any country with a large Chinese population, notably in Canada, Britain, USA and Australia.

Former Canadian diplomat Brian McAdam said: “Within each Chinese community, there’s usually a strong Triad presence controlling and extorting money from the businesses, and if there’s drugs, they’re bringing them in.”

Of the Triads enormous global reach Fritz Springmeier has written:

‘The Triads are the most powerful criminal fraternal group in the world, except for the Illuminati and the families that make up the Illuminati’s Committee of 300. The Mafia Is small peanuts compared to the Triads. The Triads are almost untouchable by any law enforcement group. For instance, in Great Britain the British do not have hardly any ethnic Chinese on their police force to even try infiltrating the Triads.’

A key source of this power is that they partner the Far East Lodges of Freemasonry in running the Asian drugs trade, notably the production of heroin in the ‘golden triangle’ in South East Asia, second only to Afghanistan. Drug trafficking is very important to the Illuminati because it funds black budget programs.

The most powerful Triads in Hong Kong have their own territories, headquarters, sub-societies and public fronts. They are allied with the tycoons. The tycoon’s own Hong Kong and the triads run it. A few of these are Sun Yee On, Wo Hop To and 14K. To insure a smooth handover of Hong Kong in 1997, the communist leadership needed these groups onside.

In the early 80s, the Chinese government convened a secret meeting between the ‘Dragon Heads’ of the major Triad groups operational in Hong Kong. The communists informed the dragons that if they agreed not to interfere with the takeover transition, they would be allowed to continue their criminal activities without interference.

Following these successful negotiations, Deng Xiaoping spoke of the triads as Chinese “patriotic groups” and the Hong Kong press published a photograph of Charles Heung, a senior officer of Sun Yee On, conversing with Deng’s daughter.

In 1992, Western Intelligence Services became aware Wong Man Fong – formerly head of China’s central news agency – was helping the triads to set up legitimate businesses in China, particularly in Guangzhou and Shanghai.

CONCLUSION

The mainstream media portrays China as hostile to Western power. However, by studying the triumvirate Chinese elite and their intimate ties to the Illuminati, it is clear that modern China is an Illuminati creation.

The Chinese elite must never stray from the NWO agenda, for it follows that if the Illuminati made them, they can break them too.

https://www.henrymakow.com/china_power_elite_are_illumina.html

(Left: Money Power banksters Zhao Xiaochuan and Lagarde preparing World Currency)

The US Empire is not the Money Power. China’s rise and 
opposition to the US fits the familiar pattern: the Money Power’s 
proxies working towards managed conflict and World Government.

by Anthony Migchels 
(henrymakow.com) 

To many it is unclear whether China is incorporated in the New World Order or a real competitor to Anglo-American Imperialism.  

There is little doubt that the Money Power co-opted the leadership of the Land of the Dragon a long time ago.

History shows that the Money Power has several tools to motivate peoples in the right direction. Their fingerprints are all over China.

In his excellent analysis of the power brokers in China, St. John Bartholomew reminds us that Marxism is a Money Power operation and that Mao did their bidding. Mao was apparently educated at Yale’s department in China. Yale’s Skull and Bones were very active in Asia and Mao was probably a member. Most American diplomats sent to him were so too.

According to Bartholomew, the triads, China’s mafia-style secret societies, were built up by Masons to combat the Qing dynasty that ruled China until the 19th century and resisted the Opium the British needed to sell to China because they had nothing else to exchange for its vast riches.

The membership list of the Trilateral Commission, the Rockefeller confab similar to the Atlantic Bilderbergers, is littered with Chinese names.

(left, Zhou-en-lai & Henry whutz-his-name discuss how China will supplant the USA over dim sum) )

MONEY SUPPLY

Another indicator is China’s money supply. The Chinese Government officially owns the money supply. It is not entirely clear where the interest goes. 
However, the Government is under control of the Money Power, so the added value, which is the essence, goes to them. It serves their purpose. The Government also can (and does) create the boom bust cycle the Money Power wants. The Emperors printed debt-free cash.

The Chinese are moving to back the Yuan by Gold, clearly promoting the Money Power’s nascent Gold Standard. Meanwhile, its Central Bank President, Zhao Xiaochuan, who is a member of the Group of 30, the Rockefeller-sponsored group of leading Central Bankers and academics, is calling for World Currency. As we have seen, opposition against the dollar is not the same thing as opposition against the Money Power.

China is a loyal member of all the international governance organizations.

Furthermore, over the last decades the Money Power has migrated a substantial part of its manufacturing base from Europe and particularly the US to China. Can there be any doubt that they would be very, very sure that that crucial strategic asset would be absolutely safe there?

CHINA’S RISE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

The build up of China must be seen in light of the decades-old program of the de-industrialization of the West, particularly America. What has been given to China, was taken from elsewhere.

Also, this build up is actually a typical M.O.: think of how US technology and money built up the USSR to create a credible ‘threat’ in the Cold War. Saddam Hussein is another example: he was made strong to be taken down later as part of the strategy to conquer the Middle East. Or Iran, which is bolstered by often Western/Israeli technology that is transferred via China.

China’s rise comes with many dangers. Chinese nationalism is primitive and easily inflamed. Beijing is under incredible pressure internally and happily uses external ‘foes’ to export these pressures. The latest rows with Japan over some trivial islands are a case in point.

Just like the Money Power conducted the European Orchestra during the 19th century, it now directs a Multi-Polar World. 

We know how it all ended in Europe: tightly knit alliances facing each other with ever more paranoia, unable to extricate themselves from the trap. One assassination was enough to light the fuse.

The same can be seen today, with NATO facing the Shanghai Cooperation Organization of Russia and China, with Pakistan and Iran as close associates.

CONCLUSION

China is being built up in a very typical fashion. All the pointers that we have come to recognize are there: usurious control of the money supply, Capitalism, Marxism, ‘secret’ societies, China towing the internationalist line.

The US Empire is not the Money Power. China’s rise and opposition to the US fits the familiar pattern: the Money Power’s proxies working towards managed conflict and World Government.

Anthony Migchels is an Interest-Free Currency activist and founder of the Gelre, the first Regional Currency in the Netherlands. You can read all of his articles on his blog Real Currencies

Related:

Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati (Bartholomew)

The US Empire is not the Money Power!

Bloomberg, the dying Fed and the birth pangs of the new Gold Standard

https://www.henrymakow.com/2013/02/is-china-part-of-the-new-world.html