In the past few weeks, Northern California has been flooded with propaganda from radio, television, newspapers, and social media, stating that the Sacramento City Council meetings have a problem with White Supremacists and Nazis. This, of course, is expected because, as we know, television, radio, newspapers, and social media are all owned by the exact same group of people. To find out who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. The question naturally comes to mind, why are we allowed to criticize Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, but we are not allowed to criticize Judaism? When the American Founders gave us the First Amendment, no religion was exempt from criticism. It is a complete and utter lie to equate legitimate criticism of groups of Jews with the Holocaust and wanting to genocide all Jews. Regardless of whether people agree with me, I am created by God; my right to speak and my First Amendment rights do not come from politicians, nor do not come from any of the 330 million other Americans either. They come from God, and they are to be violated by no man.
It needs to be understood by all concerned that if a single finger is laid upon me or those who come with me to support free speech, the direct liability for this will be laid squarely on the shoulders of the media outlets, the individuals, and the politicians who insisted on spreading malicious lies. I am not a Nazi, Racist, sexist, or a White Supremacist, nor am I any of the other malicious slanders and libels the lying left throws at me. I believe in a God who created all human beings, who loves all human beings, and who has a divine order that applies to all human beings. Human nature never changes, and God believes all humans deserve justice. Justice is what we deserve for our choices, not for factors that happened long before we were born.
These malevolent attempts to incite widespread hatred for those criticizing the existing power structure are evil and wicked. They have been going on for thousands of years.
The entire reason why we have the First Amendment is that our Founders recognized that people in power will commonly whip up mobs to kill figures who tell the truth about them. This happened with Socrates and with Jesus, and the Founders wanted to ensure that anyone who told the truth was not killed again by mobs. Here we are in 2023, and we are facing the same scenario. The power elite are whipping up mobs, especially the youth and women who do not understand history very well, and this massive hatred is now being focused on me, with the goal of leading to violence and or death for me and those associated with me.
Let us be very clear; I have never been associated with the Proud Boys, Nazis, or any White Supremacy group. I disavow the Roman salute thrown up by an individual who came to the last meeting, who I had never met before, and who told me he was supporting free speech. I do not support the death of a single innocent person, whether Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish, White, Black, Asian, or Latino. These egregious lies being spread about me that I support the death of millions of people, that I support genocide, and other gross misrepresentations, are very divisive and very dangerous, and those who are telling these lies are going to be responsible for any rioting or violence that happens at the next City Council meeting.
What is especially disturbing about this is we have elected politicians, such as Mayor Steinberg and Councilwoman Kaplan, who both happen to be Jewish, who are actively inciting violence by lying and maliciously spreading propaganda about me. The entire City Council, to varying degrees, has actively interrupted me; this includes the Mayor, Councilman Jennings, and Councilman Loloee, and it includes many of the council members actively sitting and turning their backs when I am speaking. The level of disrespect this shows is outrageous. You do not need to agree with what I am saying, but the least you can do is sit and listen. We are not like little children who throw temper tantrums when someone says something they don’t like. The City Council meetings are not gigantic safe spaces for your indoctrination.
But it gets worse. There are radical activist groups, including the Sacramento Radicals Education Twitter group, with about 2600 followers, who send activists to the City Council meetings. We do not know the coordination between politicians and these groups, but it appears likely. The last meeting seems to have been coordinated. Activists showed up with banners, and the Sacramento Bee had the most representatives it ever had at a council meeting that I attended. It was almost as if, on cue, the activists knew to get up in front of the speaker’s podium, and the mayor escaped from the back door. What should’ve happened was the mayor should have had the protesters removed from the room, and I should have been given my time to speak. What is particularly outrageous is not a single member of the City Council, Mayor, or any members of the audience defended my right to speak. It is groupthink. Everyone wants to go along with everyone else; no one wants to think for themselves individually. Only a dead fish goes with the flow.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
This is the first amendment, which means no restrictions on speech. Including hate speech. The lawyers on the council ought to know that in 2017, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, 8-0, that there are no exceptions for hate speech in the First Amendment. Speech may not be banned on the grounds that it may offend.
And, the Constitution and First Amendment were designed for a wise and virtuous people, two words I’ve never heard the Mayor or any member of the City Council use, and I’m sorry to say, they do not appear to be virtues you aspire to.
This is a clash between ideas and virtue and feelings and corruption.
Without virtue, we cannot have liberty, and since you do not cherish virtue, you are savagely attacking my liberty.
But I digress, back to the activists. We do not know if these activists are paid, but we have to wonder what their motives are. Some say they are homeless, and that is understandable. But if they are up there for homelessness, then why have they appointed themselves to police speech? They do not seem to realize that no one in America, a citizen or a politician, has ever been appointed to be speech police. We do not need your opinions on who can say what. If you disagree with something I say or someone else says, you can use your time at the podium to state why you disagree. What you cannot do is actively interrupt what I am saying and stand up and prevent me from speaking.
I’m going to paraphrase Noam Chomsky, who is a Jew,
“Mao was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.”
What we are seeing very clearly in front of our eyes is the Sacramento Mayor, and City Council are tyrants who think they get to dictate what their citizens can and cannot say. They also will actively support violent and out-of-control mobs who try to silence speakers who disagree with the mayor and City Council members.
What is tyranny? According to Webster’s 1828 Dictionary, it is, “Arbitrary or despotic exercise of power; the exercise of power over subjects and others with a rigor not authorized by law or justice, or not requisite for the purposes of government. Hence tyranny is often synonymous with cruelty and oppression.” That is precisely what is happening; the Sacramento City Council is arbitrarily creating rules and laws on speech that they are not authorized to create by the Constitution.
Ms. Kaplan, in a recent television interview, almost tacitly encourages the violence, saying that the mother in her understood and approved of what this mob was doing. The mayor recently stated, “to young people who may have seen what happened on the news last Tuesday night…get involved and get engaged. You matter.”
Young people, Mayor? Why are you calling for young people to get involved? Young people 40 and under are the most ignorant and corrupt generation in the entire history of America. Of course, in your world, that’s not true because these young ones have been brainwashed more than anyone before, and you need that for your power. Why aren’t you calling for older, wiser people to speak, people who have self-control? Our brains are not even fully formed until age 25; why are you calling for people whose brains are not even fully developed to come to City Hall, Mayor? That’s very irresponsible of you. What this is going to lead to is more emotional outbursts from people who are easily manipulated.
Now, let us give a little background. The media, as usual, is leaving out a lot of the truths that bear on this matter.
I began speaking at the Sacramento City Hall about a month ago; I intended to shine a light on the problems of who is funding the vast majority of the media and these politicians. Of course, as we know and as was aforementioned, to find out who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. Immediately, massive opposition began, and it is only getting bigger and bigger the more consistently I do this. You would think, since I only have two minutes up there to speak, people would listen and go on their way. But no, the politicians have interrupted, and mobs have nearly attacked me.
Let us also not forget these politicians up there are presiding over possibly the worst and most corrupt period in Sacramento’s history. As much as they dislike me, I have zero responsibility for the state of Sacramento today, the homelessness, the crime, the unemployment, and the terrible state of the schools. What is so interesting is that at last Tuesday’s meeting, many of the people attending were homeless or homeless activists, and they had no problem; instead of blaming the mayor and city council for the obvious responsibility they have for the homelessness problems, they turned their guns on me. It’s the simple divide and conquer strategy. To be clear, I sympathize with people experiencing homelessness, and I guarantee if I were mayor of Sacramento, there would be practically no homelessness in three years. Once this corrupt government is removed from not only Sacramento, not only California, not only America but from all over the world, people will once again be able to live stable lives and have equal opportunity, not equal outcomes.
But I digress. Let us return to the history of the past few weeks of my speaking at city council meetings. From the first time I spoke, there were three young female activists, likely all under the age of 25, who interrupted me. They are likely members of the Sacramento Radicals education, a near communist group. I have tried to speak with them, but they will not talk, just as I have tried to speak, calling members of the City Council and sending them emails, and they all refuse to respond. So they will talk about me behind my back, but they will never have a conversation face-to-face. Now, consider I have never interrupted the City Council when it is their turn to talk, I have never interrupted one of these radical speakers when it is their turn to talk, but the City Council and the radical speakers insist on interrupting me every single time that I get up there to speak. They justify this by lying about me and saying I’m a Nazi, a hater, a racist, and the rest of their cultural Marxist lexicon. The young people in there, under 30, who continually shout and screech the word Nazi, have never read three history books outside of school on World War II and their entire lives. No wise person would ever rely on their judgment on anything about World War II. This is why the mayor wants young people to come to City Hall because he knows they are the easiest for social media and the newspapers, television, and radio to brainwash.
As I began speaking the first time, the mayor, of course, interrupted me, and I said this is a game you Jews play, which is actually very accurate; now, if he was a Christian, a Hindu, a Buddhist, or a Muslim, I could’ve easily said that, but for some reason, because he happens to be a Jew, you’re not allowed to criticize any legitimate Jewish wrongdoing. Immediately, a woman or a man, I’m not sure, they say they are a transgender person named Samuel, in the very front row, immediately begins to interrupt me, stating that antisemitism is not OK. She has been brainwashed to think that any legitimate criticism of Jews is antisemitism. This is from a young woman who likely has never read three history books in her entire life. But she has no problem marching to City Hall and insisting that she is a judge of what everyone in the city of Sacramento can and cannot say. Amazing, they cannot even figure out what sex they are, they know absolutely nothing about history, but they sit there and terrorize the city into thinking that they are an authority on what the rest of us can say.
This is not new; I began speaking at city council meetings in Vallejo 11 years ago and have been interrupted at least 50 to 100 times in the past 11 years. The members of the City Council, and mayors, will never remove unruly members of the audience who interrupt speakers who differ with the mayor and city council ideologically. They deliberately allow these interruptions, which are meant to terrorize opposing speakers from City Council meetings.
In the first few weeks that I attended, I was followed to my car a number of times by likely antifa activists. One young gentleman and his friend followed me to my car and were trying to hide behind trees and buildings to avoid detection. Picture this, if you will; I am 165 pounds soaking wet, and here is a 6’4”, 250-pound man following me to my car after meetings. Does anyone think this is not meant to intimidate me? The same young man, according to my friend Jeff Perrine, has been involved in violent intimidation before. At the meeting on May 24, this young man, unprovoked, actually physically assaulted one of the gentlemen that showed up to support free speech. This, right in City Hall chambers, with police presence. The week before, at the meeting on May 15, this young man sat two rows in front of me and asked me twice did I want to go outside. So he is threatening violence right in the City Hall chambers with someone he disagrees with. There was no chance to have a conversation with him because he approached me and said, “Hey Nazi, want to go outside”? How do you converse with a young man who does not understand anything about World War II and is wrongly deceived into thinking you are a Nazi and are hostile? The short answer is you don’t.
It is the job of every mayor in America, and every city Council, to ensure that when a speaker is called upon, they are allowed to state their opinion without interruptions from the audience. This Mayor and this City Council have miserably failed in their constitutional duty to uphold the First Amendment. They do not seem to realize that the First Amendment does not just apply to their favorites and people who say nice things they like. The First Amendment is for all citizens, and as long as there is no incitement to violence, which I have never done, then every citizen has a right to speak.
The Mayor and City Council have actively allowed and encouraged speakers to interrupt, and they sit back and take pleasure in this, feeling that justice is being carried out. I’m sorry to let them know this; justice is not allowing mobs to silence speakers. We have a democracy; we do not have a mobocracy.
What is so hypocritical about this is members of the audience who interrupt me don’t just interrupt me. They interrupt other speakers, they interrupt members of the City Council, and they interrupt the Mayor. One young lady, who is part of the trio that I mentioned before, stood up when it wasn’t her turn to talk and said, “F*** Darrell Steinberg,” and Mayor Steinberg said that she was going to be kicked out, never followed up with it, and she continues interrupting him and me to this day.
What the media and members of the City Council want you to think is these are average members of Sacramento, but they are not. These are very radical types that are organized. Not sure if they are paid or not, but at the very least, they are brainwashed; at the very worst, they are agents. They are clear about being for black and brown rights, which I have no problem with; however, if you are white and you have a different opinion, they feel entitled to shout you down. They do not understand that loxism and antarianism are having a hatred of white people, and as a result, they are full of it. No one hates them; they are allowed to have unrestricted rights, they have not been threatened, they have not been attacked, and they have not been interrupted. But they feel free to do this to everyone they disagree with, especially Whites.
Mayor Steinberg and Miss Kaplan dislike being criticized for their religion. However, this is very hard to understand because they would both be in jail under the Old Testament Mosaic law. We are not in a theocracy; you are not elected to office to silence all legitimate criticism of your religion. However, the behavior of the mayor and Miss Kaplan has been wildly outrageous. The mayor has gone on television and the record in newspapers, saying there is hate, bigotry, antisemitism, and racism at City Hall when nothing I said qualifies for that. This has had the effect of riling up already unstable individuals; whether because of their drug use, or mental issues, they now become very violent. And this is a direct result of the mayor’s incitement to violence.
Further, Miss Kaplan does an interview with television, saying that she ended the City Council meeting because she felt unsafe. She mentions that a few men who showed up to support free speech had masks on; she half lies because she does not say that her side also had covers on. How could she possibly feel unsafe? There were five of us in the audience, there were metal detectors, and we obviously had no weapons. She was surrounded by 30 activists who supported her, and there were 50 police officers within five minutes that could’ve been called; what is there to feel unsafe about, Miss Kaplan? Or were you getting hysterical and hyperventilating? While lying about feeling unsafe, she deliberately encourages a dangerous environment for my friends and me because we were attacked right in City Hall chambers, and we have been threatened many times and followed to our cars. We face many incitements to violence online. All this intimidation and terrorizing result from a mayor and city council who feel it is their duty to use mobs to silence those who disagree with their dysfunctional and flat-out evil agendas. The media has been used to run interference for corrupt politicians for centuries.
Also, consider I have emailed every single member of the City Council and the mayor and received no response, I have personally called Miss Kaplan, and she promptly hung up on me. So while they like to talk behind my back, they will not speak with me. When a member of your community has a concern, it is your duty to listen. If you don’t like what they have to say and you disagree with what they say, then go ahead and present the facts that show they are incorrect. But if you cannot do this, then you likely are wrong, and if you are wrong and try to defend yourself by organizing mobs, which is precisely what you are doing, you are going to be held responsible for the outcome of that.
All newspapers and television stations will be notified of your perfidy, and as mentioned earlier, any injuries or damage caused by your malicious lying will be 100% your responsibility. So you probably better get out in front of it because if unruly mobs go wild, you will have much to answer for.