(image: Maurice Joly 1821-1879, was a Jew named Joseph Levy with a history of plagiarism.)
The assumption is that since Protocols appeared some 40 years after Joly’s Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work.
But the Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the “Protocols of Zion” are 100% authentic.
The Protocols are the basis of the New World Order (Communism)which seeks to induct mankind into Satanism by “destroying every collective force not our own” (Protocols 16-4), namely race, religion, nation, and family.
This is the explanation for the promotion of gender dysphoria (destroy marriage & family), migration & miscegenation (race) and globalism (nation.) Meanwhile,
the church (religion) has been sabotaged and the word “God” banned from public discourse.
This is the explanation for the fake pandemic which has oppressed mankind for the past two years.
From July 30, 2008
By Henry Makow PhD
It is forbidden to mention the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” (1905) without the Disclaimer that, of course, they are a “forgery” of Maurice Joly’s “Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu” (1864.)
The assumption is that sinceProtocols appeared some 40 years after Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work. But the Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the “Protocols of Zion” are authentic.
I have already argued that the two documents are neither similar nor derivative, although they have some lines and words in common.
“The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is essentially a brilliant Master Plan for dispossession and tyranny, i.e. the New World Order. It is the key to understanding our present predicament. (This is not a condemnation of all Jews, only the nucleus of bankers and high-level Masons directing this diabolical plot against the human race.)
“Dialogue in Hell” was a veiled Masonic Jewish attack on Napoleon III, an example of how they championed liberalism to undermine the Old Order and usurp power, as described in the Protocols themselves. (The author of Protocols is contemptuous of liberalism and all egalitarian programs. They are just gimmicks to manipulate the masses.)KERRY BOLTON
Reading Kerry Bolton’s monograph “The Protocols of Zion In Context”(Renaissance Press, 2003) it became obvious that Joly was plagiarizing from The Protocols and not vice-versa.
Joly, a Jew whose real name was Joseph Levy, was a lifelong Mason and member of the “Lodge of Mizraim” where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge, founder of the
Alliance Israalite Universelle and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.
The plot is described in the Protocols as “centuries-old.” It most likely predates “Dialogue.” Joly was well versed in the Protocols and borrowed from it to flesh out the unpopular authoritarian position of Machiavelli, which he ascribed to Napoleon III.
Joly, who committed suicide in 1879, was in the habit of “borrowing.” He is accused of plagiarizing a popular novel by Eugene Sue, namely “Les Mystares du Paris.” (1845) Also, his work is predated by another of Cremieux’s proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, “Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau.” (1850)
In 1884 Mme. Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian General living in Paris, hired Joseph Schorst, a member of Joly’s Mizraim Lodge to obtain sensitive information. For the sum of 2500 francs, Schorst provided Glinka with “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” He was subsequently tracked down and murdered in Egypt.
The Tsarist government, already heavily infiltrated, sat on the document. Glinka subsequently gave it to a friend who passed it on to Professor Sergius A. Nilus, left, who published it for the first time in 1901.
After the Bolshevik Revolution, Nilus was arrested in Kiev in 1924, imprisoned and tortured. The President of the Court told him he had “done them incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols.” (“Waters Flowing Eastward”by Paquita de Shishmareff, 1999, pp.74-76.)
If your plan for World Domination leaked out, what would you do? Would you admit it? “You got me! My bad!”
No, you’d employ an army of ciphers to convince everyone the document is a hoax motivated by “prejudice” and “anti-Semitism.” They have executed this “damage control” perfectly, a measure of their power to deceive even when the ugly truth is made public.
(of course, they couldn’t do it without goyem traitors i.e. Freemasons)
This is the only Conspiracy that has prevailed in spite of the Blueprint being freely available. It demonstrates the credulity (or venality) of the intelligentsia and the masses.
They have colonized our minds first. We cannot name our oppressor for fear of being accused of “antisemitism.”
It’s as though Black slaves working on cotton plantations were taught it was “racist” or “bigoted” to mention the White slave driver. Since the majority of Jews are ignorant of this plot, and are manipulated like everyone else, racism is a ploy to divert attention from a very dire problem.
The Illuminati (top-rung Masonic Jews and their non-Jewish allies) have distributed some wealth and power to the masses (liberalism, socialism) as a way of securing ultimate power for themselves. According to the Protocols, they will eventually withdraw these benefits once their “invisible government” is invincible. The “war on terror” should be seen in this context.
In my view, “Protocols Deniers” are complicit in this Conspiracy, which is responsible for most human suffering and will lead to a great deal more. As a Jew, I don’t want this responsibility on my head, or on other innocent Jews or Masons.
Related – To Understand the World, Read the Protocols of Zion
Protocols- Introduction and SynopsisProtocols 5-11 – The Slaughter of the Lambs Protocols12-15 — Freemasonry Serves the Elders Protocols 16-24 – Events Confirm their AuthenticityProtocols Plagiarism Claim is Flawed
Ken Adachi – Origin and full text of Protocols
First Comment from Tony B:
Necessary explanation very well done. Much appreciated.
In the U.S., at least, a definition of the word “protocol” may be necessary as it is not a word in common usage.
Here is one of Webster’s: “An original copy, draft, minute, or record of a document or transaction.”
This fits in exactly with the known history that Schorst stole these speaker’s notes from the lectern in an auditorium where they were being used in a series of lectures to a secret, select audience. Again, there is no reason to believe these protocols are static. Being that this plot was self-admitted as being already ancient, reason suggests that it is constantly updated. For instance, these protocols mention the control of printing presses. Today they would refer to control of the Internet.