Legal Action Against Aussie Gov’t for Misuse of COVID Test

mand-vax.jpeg

Any government that uses coercive measures to enforce the use of a medical drug on the population is committing a crime against humanity. 

This article has also been published in the Masters of Health Magazine (1 December 2020) – ‘Government Vaccination Programs: Crimes Against Humanity‘ and on the Principia Scientific International website (1 December) – ‘Vaccine Safety and the Precautionary Principle.’

Government Vaccination Programs: Crimes Against Humanity

by Judy Wilyman PhD

(henrymakow.com)

In Australia legal action has started against the government – Prime Minister, Scott Morrison and federal and state health ministers – for the fraudulent use of PCR tests to create the appearance of a pandemic and for the implementation of lockdown measures, including coercive vaccination, which will harm human health – COVID Fraud: Lawyers File action against Corrupt Australian Government. 

Governments and individuals/organisations who are promoting or enforcing false and misleading health information without the knowledge of long-term health effects in genetically diverse populations are committing a crime against humanity. It is also a crime to mandate or coerce any vaccine (drug) on a population in government policy because all medications have different side-effects in different people due to our genetics. This is a fundamental principle of medical ethics: fully informed consent without coercion, manipulation or pressure.

In addition, to the normal risks that all vaccines pose to many pre-disposed individuals the new COVID19 vaccine includes new and untested technology that will allow people to be monitored for their health status and movements. This will be recorded on an e-health card that will be used to limit your travel or other participation in society. This has already been introduced for children in Australia with the NJNPay/Play policies and now it is being enforced on adults with the new COVID19 vaccine.

It is also a crime that healthy people are being tested with a PCR test that does not diagnose disease and then these healthy people are being labelled as a ‘case’ of COVID19 that is reported in the media or they are quarantined if the test is positive; yet there are many false positives with this non-standardised test.

This fraudulent use of the PCR test has now been confirmed in the Portuguese Courts – The Portuguese Court Rules PCR tests as Unreliable and Unlawful to Quarantine People. 

Here is a video – Warning for Humanity: the COVID-19 Vaccine – that describes the new technology that is in the COVID-19 vaccine (fast-tracked and untested for safety) that will enable governments to collect our biometric data (personal identification) after vaccination.

decal.jpeg

(Decal available on Ebay)

Any government that uses coercive measures to enforce the use of a medical drug on the population is committing a crime against humanity. This is due to the diversity of our genetic-makeup yet governments are ignoring this science (epigenetics) to force the COVID19 vaccine on all international travellers who wish to fly on Qantas airlines. A policy that is expected to be adopted by other airlines soon.

This is for a vaccine that has been fast-tracked onto the market and it includes new technology that will remove our privacy and for which we do not have any long-term safety data. There is no independent analysis of the claims of safety or efficacy of this vaccine prior to being mandated for travellers’ in December 2020. This is critical information to have before coercing people with a medication that has known risks for many people.

A senior research scientist with extensive knowledge in the regulation of drugs, Dr. Saeed Qureshi, made the following comment about the many COVID19 vaccines being developed, in his article titled ‘Should FDA and other authorities approve the SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 vaccines? – A scientific perspective.’:

Arguably, there appears to be no need, at least on an urgent basis, for developing a vaccine or any other new therapies for the illness showing mild flu-like symptoms, which could be handled with already developed and available medications. Clinical trials have been conducted without scientifically valid study designs based on vague endpoints, and invalid analytical (PCR) tests that ought to produce useless conclusions and products.’

An analysis of the end-points and main issues with the clinical trials of Pfizer’s COVID19 vaccine.

baby-vax.jpeg

In Australia, this COVID-19 vaccine will be one of many vaccines that are now used coercively to deprive Australians of their right to participate fully in society. There are 12+ vaccines that have already been mandated in coercive policies for children as well as for adult employment and welfare benefits from government programs. These can be expected to be added to the adult e-health card for mandatory use in the near future.

These coercive policies are a crime against the population due to the known serious adverse health outcomes (and death) that occur after many people are vaccinated. Our genetics pre-dispose us to many chronic illnesses and these illnesses have been increasing significantly in the population in direct correlation to the increased use of vaccines for decades.

Whilst the government claims ‘correlation does not prove causation’ it is still incumbent on the government to use evidence-based medicine in the design of health policies. Dismissing this evidence as ‘a coincidence’ is not evidence-based medicine, and it is a crime against the people because it will result in significant harm/death to an unknown number of people.

San Diego teachers forced to attend ‘white privilege’ training, told ‘you are racist’

san diego-sensitivity training-1

17The ‘Land Acknowledgement’ slide of the presentation

City Journal

All San Diego teachers are being required to attend a “white privilege” training in which they are told, “you are racist” and must commit to becoming “anti-racist” in the classroom, according to a report. 

The San Diego Unified School District begins the sessions with instructors telling the faculty members that they will experience “guilt, anger, apathy [and] closed-mindedness” because of their “white fragility,” according to leaked documents obtained by journalist Christopher F. Rufo

MORE ON:

RACISM

LA’s famed Magic Castle hit with allegations of sexual misconduct, racism

Top AI ethics researcher says Google fired her

Nike faces backlash in Japan over ad that takes on racism

Louisville declares racism a public health crisis after Breonna Taylor shooting

During the training, the teachers are taught about “land acknowledgment” and asked to accept that the US was established on stolen Native American land, the report said.

They also learn about the teachings of “White Fragility” author Robin DiAngelo and “Be Antiracist: A Journal for Awareness, Reflection and Action” author Ibram X. Kend.

After watching clips of the two authors, the trainers tell the group that “you are racist” and “upholding racist ideas, structures, and policies.”

The group is challenged to become “anti-racist” in the classroom as well as “confront and examine [their] white privilege” and “teach others to see their privilege,” according to the report.

The school district didn’t immediately respond to request for comment.

The training sessions come after the district vowed to become “anti-racist” amid nationwide protests against racial injustice, which began in the wake of the cop-involved killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor.

Earlier this year, the district underwent a major overhaul to its grading system as a part of a larger effort to combat racial discrimination, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported

Data had revealed that there were significant disparities between the percentage of white and minority students who received D or F grades in the first semester of the last school year.

While white students made up 7 percent of all D or F grades, black students accounted for about 20 percent and Hispanic students received about 23 percent of them, the paper reported.

In an effort to prevent discrimination, the school board voted to eliminate non-academic factors like late work and classroom behavior in a student’s grade.

“This is part of our honest reckoning as a school district,” said Richard Barrera, who is the district’s vice president, NBC San Diego reported.

“If we’re actually going to be an anti-racist school district, we have to confront practices like this that have gone on for years and years.”

The school board also vowed to increase diversity among faculty, require school police to undergo de-escalation training and require training to eliminate bias in the hiring process, the Union-Tribune reported.

Should election results be resisted?

(Natural News) Bishop Robert McElroy of San Diego recently said that Catholics should be “proud collaborators” with the Biden administration.  On the other hand, Archbishop Vigano, the former Papal Nuncio to the U.S., frames the current conflict between Trump and Biden as part of an apocalyptic struggle between good and evil.  And he urges Catholics to resist the leftist attempt to “reset” the culture.

(Article by William Kilpatrick republished from TurningPointProject.com)

Although a significant number of Catholics agree with Vigano, a great many others, even those who aren’t happy with Biden, feel that you just have to accept the results of the election and move on.  There is, of course, a good chance that Biden’s “victory” may be overturned if sufficient election fraud is uncovered by Trump’s legal team.  But if that doesn’t happen, should that be the end of it?  Should the Catholic resistance cease and deist, and simply work toward a better result in the mid-term elections?

That largely depends on what sort of a situation we’re in.  Are we in the midst of a normal transition of power from a right-of-center party to a left-of-center party both of which share the same basic values?  Clearly not.  The two parties can no longer agree on what the Declaration of Independence calls “the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.”  One party, on the whole, accepts the Judeo-Christian view that marriage should be between one man and one woman.  The other party holds that idea in contempt.  One party maintains that there are only two sexes; the other party believes that there are an infinite number.  What’s more, the party of the second part believes it has the right to force the party of the first part to believe as they do.  Or else the non-conformists will be subject to reputation loss, job loss, and financial loss.

The two parties are even in disagreement about the purpose of government.  One party believes, per the Declaration of Independence, that governments are instituted among men primarily to protect life and liberty.  By contrast, the protection of life, liberty, and property are far down the list of priorities subscribed to by the other party—many notches below the protection of the environment, the right of 8-year-olds to choose their own gender, and the right of educators to teach children to hate their country.

If the first duty of a government is to protect the life and liberty of its citizens, then a good case can be made that the Democrats are not qualified to lead the government.  Few prominent Democrats spoke out about the rioting, looting, and assaults that occurred in hundreds of cities during the spring and summer of 2020.  Few seemed concerned with calls to defund and/or abolish the police until some realized that silence on the issue might affect their chances for re-election.  In short, the “party of the people” doesn’t seem to care if there are no police to defend the people.  What’s more, as evidenced by their penchant for gun control and even gun confiscation, they want to take away the people’s ability to defend themselves.

Democrats seem to lack enthusiasm for the Second Amendment. How about the First? Freedom of speech? Sure. But only if they approve of what you say. Otherwise you can look forward to six months of sensitivity training. The right of assembly? Yes, but only if you limit your assembly to ten people, put on your mask, practice social distancing, and refrain from inappropriate speech. Freedom of religion? That’s perfectly okay as long as your church doesn’t teach anything that conflicts with approved secular doctrine.

As we’re rapidly learning, the left-liberal establishment is no friend of the Constitution or of the liberties enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This brings us back to the question of whether or not Catholics and other citizens are bound to accept the election results.  If the election of a Democratic administration means the end of Constitutional government, are citizens constitutionally required to abide by the election results?  If, for example, a pro-slavery party had somehow managed to win the election, would the rest of the country be obliged to accept the re-establishment of slavery?

If a present-day pro-slavery party seems unimaginable, suppose that a pro-environment, pro-population control party came to power. And suppose one plank in their platform called for the culling of a certain percentage of people above the age of 80 and below the age of two. This would be by lottery, of course, to give everyone an equal chance. That’s not quite so hard to imagine, is it? But should we insist that because the population control party won the election fair and square, the rest of us must fall in line?

In short, is there a point at which citizens are justified in rejecting duly appointed leaders? The Declaration of Independence unequivocally states that there is such a point.  To wit: “Whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness], it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government…”  After which comes a qualifier: “Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes…”  However, “when a long train of abuses and usurpations… evince a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” Two sentences later, the Declaration reiterates the right to alter the government when its leaders are usurping the rights of the people and attempting to establish an “absolute Tyranny.”

The question for us is whether or not we have reached the stage of absolute tyranny.  Have we? No not quite yet.  The governing class still pays lip service to the Constitution, and they do not yet control every aspect of our lives.  But they are very close to doing that.  And because they have far more resources at their disposal, they are capable of establishing a far more total tyranny than King George could ever have imagined. They aspire not only to control behavior, but also thoughts.

How do you control thoughts?  By controlling access to information. It’s difficult to think clearly about a situation if you are poorly informed about it.  And the woke among us have become very skilled in the science of controlling what we’re allowed to know.

Here’s a case in point.  A new survey conducted by the Media Research Center (MRC) found that media censorship of news stories damaging to Biden gave him the edge in the election.  The MRC found that “one of every six Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one or more of these stories.”  For example, 35.4 % of Biden voters were unaware of “Biden sex assault allegations” and 8.9 % of those voters say they would have changed their vote if they had known.  Likewise, an amazing 45.1 % of Biden voters were unaware of the “Hunter Biden scandal,” and 9.4 % of those would have changed their vote if they had known.  The MRC study concluded that had voters not been kept in the dark about these and six other stories, Trump would have won the election handily.

The MRC poll and numerous other similar revelations suggest that the Orwellian future we have long feared has arrived ahead of schedule.  As in Orwell’s 1984, inconvenient facts are dropped down the “memory hole,” or else—as in the incriminating facts on Hunter Biden’s laptop—they are not allowed to surface in the first place.

Obviously, we are no longer dealing with a single person (such as King George) or a single party (such as the Democrats), but with a ruling elite—a governing class made up of like-minded people in government, media, academia, and big business.  This governing class is agreed that there are certain things that people should be allowed to know, and certain things that they must not even think about.

It looks as though this elite class (which from one point of view is a traitor class,) has launched a seemingly successful coup attempt against our existing Constitutional order.  Prominent members of the Democratic Party—the political wing of this elite movement—have already made clear that they plan radical changes to the Constitutional system of checks and balances.  By packing the Supreme Court, extending voting rights to D.C., Puerto Rico and territories yet to be named, and by transforming illegal immigrants into registered Democrats, they hope to secure permanent and absolute one-party rule.

In the language of the Declaration of Independence, they are the usurpers whose “direct object is the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states.”  With the help of their accomplices in big business, media, academia, and the deep state, they are in the process of dismantling the system of government created by the authors of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  In this light, President Trump’s refusal to concede the election is not an attempt to alter or abolish our still-existing system of government, but to preserve it and– to the extent that it is being hijacked– restore it.  President Trump’s determination not to yield the American system of government to a massive left-wing conglomerate intent on destroying that system seems consistent with the intent of the founders. They were men who devoted much of their lives to the cause of resisting usurpation and restoring liberty.

They were aware, however, that the survival of liberty depended not only on the content of constitutions, but also on the character of the people. As John Adams observed, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

That’s a powerful insight. As the influence of the Judeo-Christian heritage on our society declines, we can see the truth of it. Once American citizens and their political leaders lose their moral compass, there is no system of government or electoral process that can’t be corrupted.

Such people and their utopian schemes should be resisted to the best of our abilities. There is no duty to submit to tyranny. However, there is a duty to resist peacefully if at all possible. If they are principled, the Democratic leadership will have no objection to this resistance. After all, they’ve been resisting the last election for the last four years.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-06-should-election-results-be-resisted.html#

Trump says “press freedom” is nonexistent because of mainstream media suppression

(Natural News) President Donald Trump said that freedom of the press is non-existent in the U.S.because of mainstream media suppression. He made the remarks during a Nov. 29 interview, as reporters asked him several questions about alleged election fraud during the polls early in the month and how corporate media outlets are covering it.

“We don’t have freedom of the press in this country; we have suppression by the press,” the president remarked. Trump further elaborated: “You can’t have a scandal if nobody reports about it. This is the greatest fraud in the history of our country, from an electoral standpoint. And I guess you could build it up bigger than an electoral stand. This is the essence of our country: This is the whole ball game.”

Referencing a story published by the New York Post about the business dealings of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son Hunter and the story’s subsequent censorship, Trump commented that the media “doesn’t want to talk about it” as it was aware of how fraudulent the deals were. “They [Big Tech and media] don’t want to talk about Hunter, so they totally closed [the story] off, other than the Post … which took a lot of heat. It was terminated from … Twitter [and] Facebook.”

The Post‘s Oct. 15 story claimed that Hunter Biden tried to set up a meeting with his father and Ukrainian executive Vadym Pozharskyi, back when the elder Biden served as U.S. vice president. Both Pozharskyi and the younger Biden were executives at energy firm Burisma Holdings, whose founder Mykola Zlochevsky was linked to corruption. The Democratic nominee denied the meeting took place, a claim disputed by an email from Pozharskyi thanking Hunter for the “opportunity to meet … and [spend] some time” with his father.

Pozharskyi’s email and other messages were recovered from a laptop sent to a Delaware computer store for repairs: federal agents later seized the laptop, but not before the store owner copied the files in it.

Concurrently, Twitter blocked users who shared the story – and even restricted account access to some, such as the Post itself and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany.

Mainstream media outlets open about anti-Trump stance

Media outlets have typically tried to downplay, if not refused to report, allegations of fraud from Trump and his legal team. Even conservative outlet Fox News, known for frequently interviewing the president, was not spared from criticism after it called the race early in the state of Arizona on the night of Nov. 3. (Related: It’s obvious now, Fox News CONSPIRED against Trump.)

Meanwhile, other mainstream media outlets have been more open with their anti-Trump leanings. Journalist Jon Schwarz has advocated to “destroy Trump ballots” ever since the 2016 elections, which he insists is legal and “not a felony.” The Atlantic and New York Times contributor even boasted of destroying “thousands of ballots” on his Twitter account back in 2016.

These same mainstream media outlets that publish pieces from Schwarz and other anti-Trump journalists are incidentally silent when it comes to whistleblowers like Tony Bobulinski exposing corruption by the Biden family and Antifa assaulting supporters of the president in Washington, D.C. (Related: Media watchdog calls to investigate mainstream media election meddling.)

Back in 2016, stress expert Dr. Pete Sulack explained that mainstream media and its active promotion of “fears of some kind of Nazi regime under a Trump presidency” causes stress and anxiety. He told Breitbart in an email that “this is [partly] because problems and pain sell advertising space. Mass communications has always struggled with that balance between fair reporting, personal bias and pressure from executives to keep things ‘hot.’”

Sulack also noted that people were responding negatively to anti-Trump images on television and social media because “a different part of [the] brain is engaged.” He explained that the limbic brain, which is also activated in stressful situations, mainly acts on emotion when seeing certain kinds of pictures.

Follow Trump.news to stay updated with the latest news about the mainstream media’s news blackout of election fraud.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-06-trump-press-freedom-nonexistent-because-msm-suppression.html#

Lawsuit-worthy? YouTube literally announces platform will begin to discriminate against straight white male creators

atural News) The left constantly screams about how they want to achieve ‘fairness’ and ‘equity,’ then they work double shifts to become the biggest discriminators on the planet.

And now YouTube has joined the fray, literally admitting content gatekeepers will be selectively censoring straight, white males so they can achieve more “diversity” on the platform.

This week, the video hosting platform announced it would be issuing a survey to all creators asking them their race, gender, and sexual orientation ahead of adjusting algorithms to artificially boost “diverse creator communities” — code for anti-white, anti-heterosexual discrimination.

“As our CEO, Susan Wojcicki, wrote in June, we’re examining how our policies and products are working for everyone — and specifically for the Black community — and working to close any gaps,” YouTube said in statement posted to the platform blog.

“Our goal is to make YouTube a place where creators can thrive in the long term, and we’ve done extensive work in this area, but we’ve heard concerns across various communities about their ability to grow their channels,” the statement said. 

“We want to ensure our systems do not reflect unintentional bias and the existing process is currently limited because we only have information about content, not identifying information about the creators themselves,” it added.

How about this: Maybe some of the content being created by minorities is terrible…and that’s why it’s not more popular. Because there are a lot of straight, white men who create bad content too, by the way, which is why their channels don’t grow.

But that’s okay; it’s only when a creator of color or an LGBTQ creator’s subscriber base doesn’t grow it’s not ‘fair’ (and is that also true for creators living in nations of color?).

“To better evaluate a concern from a specific creator community (e.g., concerns that our monetization systems are working differently for different creators) we need to have data about which videos come from which communities,” the statement continued. 

“Today, we can identify what a video is about but this does not take into account who the creator is or how they identify. For example, our systems can evaluate how videos about Black Lives Matters are performing against other content on YouTube regardless of the creator, but we’re currently not able to evaluate growth for Black beauty creators, LGBTQ+ talk show hosts, female vloggers or any other community,” it adds.

Again, why isn’t content the key here? After all, it is for everything else ‘media.’ If the content is generally viewed as bad by most people on social media, then it’s not going to ‘catch on.’ Artificially suppressing content (that might actually be thought of as pretty good by most who see it) based on skin color, gender or ‘preference’ sounds like YouTube is just begging for a lawsuit. (Related: YouTube and Vimeo censor ‘Antifa: Rise of the Black Flags’ documentary.)

And the platform doesn’t seem to care, as the statement indicates.

“Today, we’re announcing a new effort to help us more proactively identify potential gaps in our systems that might impact a creator’s opportunity to reach their full potential. Starting in 2021, YouTube will ask creators on a voluntary basis to provide us with their gender, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity. We’ll then look closely at how content from different communities is treated in our search and discovery and monetization systems. We’ll also be looking for possible patterns of hate, harassment, and discrimination that may affect some communities more than others,” it says.

The platform then went on to say that censors have terminated “more than 54,000” YouTube channels just in the last quarter for “hate speech” — which, as we’ve seen on these Marxist-run platforms time and again is defined as conservative, pro-Trump speech.

The bottom line is this: If you’re okay with being censored just based on being a white guy who likes women, then by all means, continue to post your content to YouTube. 

But if you don’t want to be censored based on anyfactor, maybe try a different video platform that doesn’t base its algorithms on identity politics — like Brighteon.com.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-06-youtube-announces-will-discriminate-against-straight-white-male-creators.html

If vote fraud wins in 2020, prepare for life to get ugly

By Martin Marcus

In the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, we have heard about massive voter fraud in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.  It appears that the fraud, if reversed, would change the winner in these states from Joe Biden to Donald Trump.  The electoral votes in question add to 79.  This would give Trump a total of 311, easily making him the winner.

Trump has tried suing to right the situation, but unfortunately, almost all of the judges hearing the cases dismiss them without even giving Trump’s lawyers the right of discovery.  These judges are ignoring several smoking guns.

Will the Supreme Court come to the rescue?  If they do, they can make judgments regarding only the crimes that may have been committed.  They cannot decide who gets the electors.  This is the state legislators’ responsibility.  It will be helpful if the Court reminds the legislators of this.

For the states in question, all but Nevada have a Republican majority in their legislatures.  I assume that the Nevada majority is pleased with the Democrat electors.  The rest of the state legislature majorities should be champing at the bit to invalidate the election and make their own choice.  To their credit, they are having hearings on this issue.  Unfortunately, they fear backlash from the press.  As low-level politicians, some of them may not have the courage to undo the damage and elect a Republican slate of electors.  If this is the case, then the criminals will have won.  They will commit this crime in every subsequent election, including the January Senate runoff in Georgia.  There will be a Democrat majority in the House, the Senate, and every state Legislature.  Acting like cowards will ensure their political demise.

With this new government, most people will have very little control over their lives.  Those at the top of government will have a lot of power and will probably take a lot of perverse pleasure in it.  State legislators in what will become the minority party are not at the top of government and will have no more power than the rest of us.

What kind of changes will we have to endure?  We will wear masks forever.  There will always be a medical crisis mandating them.

There will be a war on combustion.  We will be forced to drive electric cars or no car at all.  Barack Obama began this effort in 2009 with his “cash for clunkers” program.

Thanks to new regulations, we will pay much higher prices for technology and medical care.

We will have medical death panels.  It is already starting.  The first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine will be health care workers and nursing home residents.  So far, the choice is palatable, but who will be the next one to be deemed worthy of survival?  I assume that I will be dead last (pun intended).

The war on combustion means there will be no fossil fuel to heat our homes.  We will have to use heat pumps exclusively.  Heat pumps require refrigerant.  There is already a high price for refrigerant because of previous regulations.  Expect the price to go higher.  All of this will lead to rationing of electricity.  There will be either rolling blackouts or central control of the thermostat.  The latter already occurs in some people’s homes.

Government monitoring of our telephone calls and internet use will continue.

All guns will be confiscated.

The state legislators will not be exempt from this horror.

I call upon all Republican state legislators in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to reject the 2020 presidential elections in their states as inconclusive and vote in their own slate of electors.  Make democracy great again.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/if_vote_fraud_wins_in_2020_prepare_for_life_to_get_ugly.html#ixzz6frZU56DF
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

California Sheriff: I Won’t Enforce Gov. Gavin Newsom’s ‘Ridiculous’ COVID-19 Rules
California Sheriff: I Won’t Enforce Gov. Gavin Newsom’s ‘Ridiculous’ COVID-19 Rules

DECEMBER 5, 2020 By Jordan Davidson

Riverside County, Calif. Sheriff Chad Bianco published a video on Friday saying he will not enforce California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest lockdown orders that will devastate local hospitals, businesses, schools, and civil liberties.

“These closures and stay-at-home orders are flat-out ridiculous,” he added. “The metrics used for closures are unbelievably faulty and are not representative of true numbers, and are disastrous for Riverside County.”

Bianco said his police department will not be coerced into threatening the livelihoods, safety, and security of local residents. Instead, they will trust local citizens to protect themselves and others with “common-sense” precautions.

“He is expecting us to arrest anyone violating these orders, cite them and take their money, close their businesses, make them stay in their homes, and take away their civil liberties, or he will punish all of us,” Bianco said. “While the governor’s office and the state has threatened action against violators, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department will not be blackmailed, bullied, or used as muscle against Riverside County residents in the enforcement of the governor’s orders.”

Bianco highlighted Newsom’s hypocrisy in constantly refusing to follow the same rules he is inflicting on Californians, as well as his threat to withhold funds from localities that don’t obey him while doing exactly the same thing to the federal government regarding enforcing immigration laws.

Newsom’s “dictatorial attitude toward California residents, while dining and luxury traveling, keeping his business open and sending his kids to in-person private schools is very telling about his attitude toward California residents, his feelings about the virus, and it is extremely hypocritical,” Bianco said, referring to the governor’s recent dinner at a fancy restaurant with a dozen other people right after prohibiting gatherings of more than three households for Californians.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=PvvRme0h2oY%3Fversion%3D3%26rel%3D1%26fs%3D1%26autohide%3D2%26showsearch%3D0%26showinfo%3D1%26iv_load_policy%3D1%26wmode%3Dtransparent

The video responds to Newsom’s most recent order, announced Thursday, closing hair salons, banning indoor and outdoor dining at restaurants, and limiting retail capacities to 20 percent in areas if ICU bed capacity falls below 15 percent. Bianco said he believes “all jobs are essential to someone,” and that Newsom’s demands in the name of health will actually impede local hospitals’ ability to treat COVID patients and others.

“When the medical field is so split about this virus, it might be time to employ a little common sense,” he added. “Keeping money and support from our hospitals who are struggling with normal seasonal increases in patients, coupled with COVID-19 patients, is irresponsible.”

Bianco encouraged his community to continue to follow health guidelines such as practicing social distancing and wearing masks, saying he believed that Americans are responsible enough to gauge their own risks and take precautions to protect themselves and others. Newsom’s expectations, Bianco stated, do not resemble true leadership.

“Leaders do not threaten or attempt to intimidate or cause fear, bullies do, as has been our position from the beginning of this pandemic,” Bianco said.Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/05/california-sheriff-i-wont-enforce-gov-gavin-newsoms-ridiculous-covid-19-rules/

Vaccinations are Crime Against Humanity

mand-vax.jpeg
decal.jpeg
baby-vax.jpeg

Any government that uses coercive measures to enforce the use of a medical drug on the population is committing a crime against humanity. 

This article has also been published in the Masters of Health Magazine (1 December 2020) – ‘Government Vaccination Programs: Crimes Against Humanity‘ and on the Principia Scientific International website (1 December) – ‘Vaccine Safety and the Precautionary Principle.’

Government Vaccination Programs: Crimes Against Humanity

by Judy Wilyman PhD

(henrymakow.com)

In Australia legal action has started against the government – Prime Minister, Scott Morrison and federal and state health ministers – for the fraudulent use of PCR tests to create the appearance of a pandemic and for the implementation of lockdown measures, including coercive vaccination, which will harm human health – COVID Fraud: Lawyers File action against Corrupt Australian Government. 

Governments and individuals/organisations who are promoting or enforcing false and misleading health information without the knowledge of long-term health effects in genetically diverse populations are committing a crime against humanity. It is also a crime to mandate or coerce any vaccine (drug) on a population in government policy because all medications have different side-effects in different people due to our genetics. This is a fundamental principle of medical ethics: fully informed consent without coercion, manipulation or pressure.

In addition, to the normal risks that all vaccines pose to many pre-disposed individuals the new COVID19 vaccine includes new and untested technology that will allow people to be monitored for their health status and movements. This will be recorded on an e-health card that will be used to limit your travel or other participation in society. This has already been introduced for children in Australia with the NJNPay/Play policies and now it is being enforced on adults with the new COVID19 vaccine.

It is also a crime that healthy people are being tested with a PCR test that does not diagnose disease and then these healthy people are being labelled as a ‘case’ of COVID19 that is reported in the media or they are quarantined if the test is positive; yet there are many false positives with this non-standardised test.

This fraudulent use of the PCR test has now been confirmed in the Portuguese Courts – The Portuguese Court Rules PCR tests as Unreliable and Unlawful to Quarantine People. 

Here is a video – Warning for Humanity: the COVID-19 Vaccine – that describes the new technology that is in the COVID-19 vaccine (fast-tracked and untested for safety) that will enable governments to collect our biometric data (personal identification) after vaccination.

(Decal available on Ebay)

Any government that uses coercive measures to enforce the use of a medical drug on the population is committing a crime against humanity. This is due to the diversity of our genetic-makeup yet governments are ignoring this science (epigenetics) to force the COVID19 vaccine on all international travellers who wish to fly on Qantas airlines. A policy that is expected to be adopted by other airlines soon.

This is for a vaccine that has been fast-tracked onto the market and it includes new technology that will remove our privacy and for which we do not have any long-term safety data. There is no independent analysis of the claims of safety or efficacy of this vaccine prior to being mandated for travellers’ in December 2020. This is critical information to have before coercing people with a medication that has known risks for many people.

A senior research scientist with extensive knowledge in the regulation of drugs, Dr. Saeed Qureshi, made the following comment about the many COVID19 vaccines being developed, in his article titled ‘Should FDA and other authorities approve the SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 vaccines? – A scientific perspective.’:

Arguably, there appears to be no need, at least on an urgent basis, for developing a vaccine or any other new therapies for the illness showing mild flu-like symptoms, which could be handled with already developed and available medications. Clinical trials have been conducted without scientifically valid study designs based on vague endpoints, and invalid analytical (PCR) tests that ought to produce useless conclusions and products.’

An analysis of the end-points and main issues with the clinical trials of Pfizer’s COVID19 vaccine.

In Australia, this COVID-19 vaccine will be one of many vaccines that are now used coercively to deprive Australians of their right to participate fully in society. There are 12+ vaccines that have already been mandated in coercive policies for children as well as for adult employment and welfare benefits from government programs. These can be expected to be added to the adult e-health card for mandatory use in the near future.

These coercive policies are a crime against the population due to the known serious adverse health outcomes (and death) that occur after many people are vaccinated. Our genetics pre-dispose us to many chronic illnesses and these illnesses have been increasing significantly in the population in direct correlation to the increased use of vaccines for decades.

Whilst the government claims ‘correlation does not prove causation’ it is still incumbent on the government to use evidence-based medicine in the design of health policies. Dismissing this evidence as ‘a coincidence’ is not evidence-based medicine, and it is a crime against the people because it will result in significant harm/death to an unknown number of people….

https://www.henrymakow.com