On 9/11, I posted this tweet: “John MacArthur was asked why thousands died on 9/11. He answered by quoting ‘the wages of sin is death.’ We all have an appointment with death due to sin. It may be today or in many years, but we will all die. It’s part of living on this wicked planet. Believe in Jesus Christ.” This enraged many people. They accused me of being cold-hearted and not compassionate.

How did Jesus respond when people asked Him about innocent people dying from a tyrant? “There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” (Luke 13:1-3)

How did He respond when asked about innocent people dying from a tragic accident? “Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” (Luke 13:4,5)

Many so-called Christians would have called Jesus cold-hearted and not compassionate for responding this way to tragedies. It’s as if people don’t expect to die these days. They have forgotten that we live in a fallen, wicked world where the rain falls on the just and the unjust. That we all have an appointment with death. Jesus didn’t die to give us a long, healthy, and happy life. He died to reconcile us to God, so that we could have eternal life. It’s on the new earth where we will live for eternity with no pain, no viruses, no suffering, and no death!

Our days are numbered on this earth. We are pilgrims and strangers passing through. This is not our home. It’s sad to see so many Christians so fearful of this virus. This world is full of viruses, disease, and even death. This is part of living on a fallen planet. And remember, for all who believe in Jesus Christ, death will usher us into immediately into the presence of Jesus Christ. We have nothing to fear!

For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Romans 6:23

Unless You Repent, You Too Shall Perish

Mike Yeadon – Cabalists “Plan to Kill off the Majority of the Human Race”


Mike Yeadon is a PhD in respiratory pharmacology and a former VP of Pfizer

“Given that these are not vaccines, they don’t work as vaccines, 

they’re massively far away from any acceptable safety profile 

& there are low cost, well understood drug treatments, 

why would you allow anyone to stick a needle in your arm?”


This was written in response to this article by Dr. Paul Alexander and Dr. Howard Tenenbaum

by Mike Yeadon  (Sept. 12, 2021)


The population of the planet of being taken through the gates of hell over a probably partly-invented virus, which is not unusual in its lethality.

I agree these ‘vaccines’ were never appropriate & there was ample evidence of global fraud by fear long before that vaccine was prematurely considered for emergency use authorization.

Re-reading Dr Peter Doshi’s blog post in BMJ, referencing Pfizer’s regulatory submission to FDA, he made some striking observations.

Specifically, he pointed out how THOUSANDS of suspected ‘cases’ from the vaccine arm of the trial had been “removed from statistical analysis because of “unspecified protocol deviations”.

When Doshi reanalyzed the data with all the subject included, ‘efficacy’ fell to 19% (and not significant).

I know enough about clinical trials & the many conventions that ensure you don’t carry undeclared conflicts of interest.

What was done in that trial was clearly improper. In reality, the Pfizer / BioNTech product never even worked in the closely controlled trial.

I also think there is a virus. I’m no longer convinced it’s as described but is a blend of genetic material from several different sources.

Three key questions:

1. Do these vaccines work?

I suspect none of them do. Paul & Howard lay out some of the evidence.

2. Are these vaccines safe?

They are absolutely not safe. They are responsible for huge numbers of horrific injuries & deaths in completely unprecedented numbers, based on review of public vaccine safety monitoring systems in the US, U.K. & Europe.

3. Are these vaccines necessary?

No, not at all. If anything, deaths rise immediately after mass vaccination started almost everywhere when the data was good enough to examine. On the other side of the medical ledger, excellent treatments have been identified & used, 85-90% of severe illness & death was prevented.

Given the foregoing, that these are not vaccines, they don’t work as vaccines, they’re massively far away from any acceptable safety profile & there are low cost, well understood drug treatments, why would you allow anyone to stick a needle in your arm?

I beg of you: if you’ve not been vaccinated, do not capitulate now. If you’ve been vaccinated, reject the bribe of some of your freedoms bank (aka vaccine passport). Giving in to tyranny always leads to more tyranny.

We must not cooperate with our own entrapment. I keep a good eye out on many countries. It is clear that one objective is to lure us all into a VaxPass database. Then we’ll have to show it in order to buy food. Now you cannot protest, or you’ll go hungry.

Ultimately, it’s my deduction that the evil perpetrators will exploit their tyrannical powers to kill off the majority of the human race.


Something like this has been planned for close to 40 years. See The Georgia Guidestones.

Please share this & please resolved to cooperate only with your fellow citizens in thwarting this diabolical crime.



Related – Yeadon – Covid Vaccine Could be Linked to Infertility 

Mark Trozzi web site – Great videos and info 

You may recall the April released Trozzi Production about Dr. Michael Yeadon entitled “Vaccine” Red Alert

Kabbalists Publicly Discuss Plot to Kill Millions

Rabbis reveal shockcing Holocaust Secrets


How to Get Laid? Get Married!


My Twitter polls have shown that twice as many respondents who had “great sex” were married (30% vs 15% who were single.)For most people, the idea of reserving sex for marriage is a quaint and outdated ideaWe’ve been taught to behave like homosexuals who “cruise” seeking promiscuous sex for its own sake. We value sex appeal above the qualities of a lifelong marriage partner. Satanist social engineers don’t want us to start families and propagate. They’re trying to get rid of us. 
Sex is not just about satisfying sexual desire. It’s an expression of love.

Modern cult-ure puts the cart (sex) before the horse (relationship.) 

Men thwart themselves by treating women as sex objects, not as people, with natural desires and personalities. A young man should find a good woman, preferably one who loves sex (most do.) He should be attentive to her wishes and needs. He’d be surprised how much he can achieve just by asking permission. At the same time, he must remember that women are enlisted/drafted not petitioned. So it’s a balance.

Many men destroyed their careers because they didn’t know how to get laid. For example, Andrew Cuomo, Eliot Spitzer, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Louis CK, Les Moonves, Harvey Weinstein.  Inappropriate workplace sexual advances is one of the few taboos left (unless you’re Joe Biden.)
“Sex is a form of woman-worship. When a man “makes love” to his wife, he is basically celebrating and thanking her for everything she gives him. Sex is an act of love.”

Sex is a Rite of Marriage
(Updated from Oct 8, 2017)
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
When I was a teenager in the 1960’s, society still believed that sex was something reserved for marriage.


Around that time, we were bombarded with propaganda that taught that prohibiting extramarital sex was prudish and life-denying. This was part of a larger Communist social engineering program designed to destroy the institution of marriage. The pendulum now has swung to this satanist extreme where anonymous extramarital sex (hooking up, fuck-buddy, booty call) has been normalized. “Partying” is essentially pairing up for anonymous sex. 

I am not here to advocate reserving sex for marriage because often it is impractical. Consecrating sex for marriage enhances the importance of marriage and creates a powerful bond. But, people should not rush into marriage for sex alone. 

However, those quaint religious restrictions contain great wisdom that cannot be ignored. 
Here’s why:
1. Female nature. Sex is the most intimate act possible, especially for women. The emotional connection should correspond.
More than anything, healthy heterosexual women want to be lovedby a man, their husband. They want to his Goddess. They want to be possessed by him. “Sex is a form of woman-worship. When a man “makes love” to his wife, he is basically celebrating and thanking her for everything she gives him. Sex is an act of love.”

During intercourse, most women’s faces become very beautiful, as if nature has blessed this act. Sex is obviously a rite of marriage as a man cannot really “make love” to a woman he doesn’t know or love. Anonymous sex really is masturbating. 


2. In The Psychology of Women (1944) psychiatrist Helene Deutsch said women are governed by a combination of masochistic and narcissistic instincts. For sacrificing themselves to husband and children, (masochism), they want to be cherished (i.e. narcissism.) It is her masochism that makes a man love a woman. How many men love their wives for what puts up with from him? 
When she sacrifices her ego and self-interest, she becomes part of him, his companion and support.  This is how two people become one. As I have said,women trade power for love. 

3. A loving husband is not a sadist. His healthy natural reaction is to want her to love being his. Thus, he does everything to nurture, empower and respect her independence, views, and desires without pandering. He loves her. 
The Masonic Jewish (Illuminati) mass media is full of propaganda about women who have been betrayed and exploited by men. This is expected from Satanists dedicated to destroying marriage and enslaving humanity. But marriage has withstood the test of time because men and women know instinctively that it is based on mutual dependence. 
Women become feminine when they sacrifice power for love.  The more power they cede, the more love they get. Sex is an act of domination and possession. Therefore it must be reserved for marriage where a woman’s vulnerability is protected. 


The Illuminati have taught women to seek power instead of love. Seek career not family. “Men are oppressors.” Since masculinity is defined by power, the effect is to neuter both sexes. As a consequence, many women can’t give themselves to a man. That’s what love is. That’s what makes a man love a woman.
I see these forlorn “independent” women everywhere, some obese, many with pet dogs, some carving out a relationship with another woman. They ate the apple, the poisonous communist satanist apple.
Thanks to communist brainwashing, they will never know the joy and fulfillment of marital love and sex as God and nature intended.—
Related -Makow- Having Sex is Not Making Love ——————————– Love is Woman’s Stock-in-Trade ——————————– Possession is the Essence of Marriage



Years ago, I was sitting at the lunch table with a handful of the teachers where I taught. I was pregnant at the time. Every single woman at the table admitted that they regretted having children. (This reminded me of one of my bridesmaids coming to me on my wedding day telling me she regretted getting married!) I was shocked! I couldn’t imaging regretting having children. My mom loved having and raising children. I was looking so forward to it.

Yes, it’s hard. Yes, pregnancy and delivery are hard. Yes, disciplining and training children are hard. It’s all very hard, but oh, so worth it! I have never once regretted having my children. No, not even in during the hard times. Why did these teachers regret having children, and I never have?

There’s an article called Inside the Growing Movement of Women Who Wish They’d Never Had Kids. Here are the reasons listed for the regrets in quotes. My responses are after each quote.

“She was overwhelmed and frustrated, prone to lengthy crying jags, and consumed by boredom and dissatisfaction.” This is why young women need older women in their lives. Their mothers need to help if they’re around. (However, my mom had no help and still LOVED having babies and raising them.) They also need to be taught the value of what they are doing, raising the next generation!

“Day after day, as they change diapers, drive to soccer practice, and help with college applications, they fantasize about a life unburdened by dependents and free from the needs of others.” This is why God commands that we take every thought captive to the obedience of Christ. If they learn to not fantasize but learn that godliness with contentment is great gain, they will find satisfaction and fulfillment in what they are doing.

“I know my life would have been much happier and more fulfilled without children.” Why? Did she raise her children in the nurture and the admonition of the Lord? Was she the one home full time to train and discipline them? I can’t imaging being happier and more fulfilled than I was and am raising my children and now helping with my grandchildren.

“I wish I would never had kids. I realize I am not mother material, and I am terrified thinking how I am going to be forced to take care of it.” All women are mother material. They need to be taught. Older women need to step up and teach the younger women to love their children. Mothers need to be home full time to show their daughters how to be godly wives and mothers instead of living like feminists in the workforce.

“‘I wonder if my accomplishments would be more spectacular,’ says Ananya, a 38-year-old freelance writer and editor who divides her time between the United States and Singapore. ‘Would I have written my second or third book? Would I be able to travel to chase that elusive story? I feel motherhood has slowed me down so much.’” Feminism convinced women that there was more “out there.” The workforce and travel is where it’s at supposedly. She needs to read all of the stories of women who lived that life and now are full of regrets. They are lonely with their cats.

“With mothers, it’s simply expected that you will be an attentive, highly-involved caretaker, and there is no praise when you are.” Yes, if a woman becomes a mother, her attention and energy must go into her children. It’s a sacrificial life with many blessings. Our praise comes from the Lord, and guess what? It comes from our husband, children, and grandchildren if we have poured our lives and love into them.

“They lamented to her a life of responsibility that never ends (“once a mother always a mother”) and conveyed a general sense that motherhood was a bad fit—that it’s not always, without question, good for every woman.” Again, it’s because women are listening to the lies of feminism. Most women these days were raised by absent mothers, and no one taught them the value of motherhood. They are lost and floundering.

“Women are now expected to lean in both at work and at home, never missing a board meeting or ballet recital.” Women weren’t created to do it all. They weren’t created for the workforce and home. They were created for a life at home. When a mother is home full time, she won’t have to worry about board meetings, and she will love going to her daughter’s ballet recital. I sure did!

Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
Psalm 127:3

Mothers Who Regret Having Children

Lawsuit: 220,000 Military Service Members Say ‘No’ To Biden’s Forced Covid Injections

The Biden administration is trying to redefine the meaning of the word “immunity” in its attempt to force the Covid injection on 220,000 U.S. military service members who have already contracted and survived the SARS COV-2 virus that originated in Wuhan, China.

lawsuit 220,000 military service members say ‘no’ to biden’s forced covid injections

This has opened the door for a federal lawsuit filed August 30 by two active-duty service members against Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Homeland Security Director Xavier Bacerra and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Janet Woodcock.

The Navy this week gave its sailors 90 days to get the shot and the Army and Air Force were poised Thursday to enforce their own timetables, reported Military.com.

The suit, filed August 30 in U.S. District Court in Colorado, seeks immediate injunctive relief.

The two plaintiffs, Daniel Robert, a 33-year-old drill sergeant at Fort Benning Army base in Columbus, Georgia, and Hollie Mulvihill, a 29-year-old staff sergeant at the Marine Corp base in Jacksonville, North Carolina, are asking the court for a temporary restraining order preventing the forced injections before a full hearing can be scheduled. They are ultimately seeking a permanent injunction and declaratory judgment against Biden’s Department of Defense.

The two defendants represent 220,000 other U.S. military active-duty members who have natural immunity and do not want any of the three synthetic gene-based “vaccines” shot into their bodies.

All three injections, manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, are based on an all-new technology, never before used in any previous vaccine, and have never been tested for the long-term health effects on the human body.

The three shots combined have resulted in an unprecedented number of adverse reactions being reported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, including over 13,000 reported deaths, more than double the number of all the other vaccines combined since VAERS was established in 1990.

According to the lawsuit, Army Regulation 40-562 is the all-service publication that governs the administration of “Immunizations and Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of infectious diseases.”

AR 40-562 clearly states that documented survivors of an infectious disease have a “presumptive exemption from vaccination due to natural immunity acquired as a result of having survived the infection,” the lawsuit states.

Army Regulation 40-562 states:

“General examples of medical exemptions include the following … Evidence of immunity based on serologic tests, documented infection, or similar circumstances.”

U.S. Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Dr. Admiral Bret Diroir stated on August 24 in an interview with Fox News:

“So natural immunity, it’s very important … There are still no data to suggest vaccine immunity is better than natural immunity. I think both are highly protective.”

In fact, data exists that would suggest it’s the other way around – that natural immunity far exceeds that of vaccine immunity. A recent study out of Israel showed natural immunity is significantly stronger and lasts longer than the synthetic immunity delivered by the vaccines, protection from which even the CDC has admitted begins to wane after three to five months.

‘This Ends The Debate’: Israeli Study Shows Natural Immunity 13x More Effective Than Vaccines At Stopping Delta.

Yet, on the very same day that Diroir was playing up the importance of natural immunity on Fox News, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin issued a memo mandating the entire Armed Forces be inoculated with the Covid shots.

In that memo, Austin created an all-new concept never before existing in the history of medical science and in complete contradiction to the plain language of the DoD’s own regulations. He said “those with previous COVID-19 infection are not considered vaccinated.”

The lawsuit states that the DoD regulation “contains no such term, nor concept, and the defendant Secretary of Defense’s new definition effectively wipes away the DoD’s own regulation. The secretary of defense is not a doctor, and this declaration has no basis in medical science at all, nor did this instant change to the regulation go through any notice and comment period, nor rulemaking process, nor any process at all. Indeed, the Secretary of Defense simply declared it without a scintilla of evidence to support it.”

Dr. Lee Merritt, a retired U.S. Navy surgeon, speaking at a White Coat Summit of America’s Frontline Doctors in July 2021, said more U.S. service members have likely died of the vaccine in 2021 than the combined total who died of Covid in all of last year. She stated at that conference:

“One of my big problems is our vaccination of the military. I was a 10-year Navy surgeon so I have Navy people and Army people calling me. There were only 20 deaths of all the active duty in 2020 for Covid, in all the services put together. They have a big epidemiological base and they can find out exactly what’s going on.

“There were only 20 deaths and we are vaccinating everybody. We’ve already had tumors and we’ve had 80 cases of myocarditis, which has a significant five-year mortality rate, I think it’s 66 percent… So, with the vaccination program we have ostensibly killed more of our young active-duty people than Covid did.”

Lawyers for the plaintiffs, led by Todd Callender in Denver, stated in the lawsuit that repeated attempts to leave voicemail messages for Austin in an attempt to settle the grievance out of court have been ignored by Austin, leaving them no choice but to file suit.

The lawsuit concludes: “On August 30, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a motion for an emergency restraining order in the form of a stay pendente lite, preventing the Defendant Department of Defense from inoculating them and anyone similarly situated that comprises the class of service members who can document that they previously had Covid-19 and as a result have developed natural immunity that exempts them from inoculation under AR 40-562.”

A lot of active-duty service members and their parents are pinning their hopes on this lawsuit.

“This may be the last stand,” the father of an Air National Guardsman stationed at Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Harrison Township, Michigan, told LeoHohmann.com.

If the lawsuit fails, it is feared that Biden’s Defense Department could try to up the stakes by dishonorably discharging those who reject the jab. So far, the Pentagon has stopped short of such threats and is allowing for religious exemptions.

A movement is afoot in the U.S. House where some lawmakers are getting behind legislation prohibiting dishonorable discharges for troops who refuse the Covid shot.

Legislation sponsored by Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., requires only honorable discharges for anyone who is separated from the military over rejecting the injection. It was added to the fiscal 2022 defense authorization bill, passed by the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday. [See Lawmakers Try to Ban Dishonorable Discharges for Troops Who Refuse Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines, Sept. 2, 2021, by Travis Tritten, Military.com]

“No American who raises their hand to serve our nation should be punished for making a highly personal medical decision,” Green said in a statement.

Military.com reported on a Marine corporal who said she was discharged for refusing to wear a mask, possibly the first service member to be pushed out of the military in connection with COVID-19 rules.

According to the Pentagon, roughly 63 percent of all U.S. forces had received at least one dose of the controversial vaccine as of Aug. 18.