She wrote and told me that her husband isn’t “happy” being married with children. He wants to leave his family because he’s attracted to other men. He wants to become a sodomite. He thinks this will make him happy. I wrote about a man many years ago who was attracted to other men but married a woman and had children with her. He wanted a family, so he put away his own sexual desires to have one. I found out recently that he has left his family and gone after his “desires.” Now, he tells us he is “happy”!
Our culture has been taught that if you’re not happy, it’s due to your circumstances. If you’re not happy being a boy, become a girl. If you’re not happy being a girl, become a boy. If you’re not happy being married, leave and go seek your own happiness. All this has done is to make people more unhappy, depressed, and suicidal. We can’t think we will find the elusive “happy” we are seeking by living in direct disobedience to God.
Happiness is a choice. It’s a choice to be joyful and thankful regardless of one’s circumstances. It comes from obeying God and knowing His ways are perfect. It will never come from things on this earth because they are always changing. God’s Word and His promises are unchanging and constant. There is far more joy in loving and serving others rather than expecting others to serve you. There is far more joy in being kind and generous rather than being selfish and obsessed with oneself.
What does God tell us about being happy? “Happy is that people, that is in such a case: yea, happy is that people, whose God is the LORD” (Psalm 144:15) “Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth understanding” (Proverbs 3:13) Those who make God their LORD are happy! We know who’s in control. We love His promises. We know how it all ends. We know He will never leave nor forsake us. We love wisdom! We can renew our minds with Truth and not live in fear. We can be thankful for His many blessings and His love for us. Why wouldn’t Christians be the happiest people on earth?
But and if ye suffer for righteousness’ sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear. 1 Peter 3:14,15
Voddie Baucham says that whenever a young person asks what he or she can do to be serious about serving the Lord, he always says the same thing. When young men say, “How can I enter ministry?” or young ladies say, “What can I do to serve Jesus?” they are probably anticipating something about going to college or seminary or traveling to some foreign country to do missions. Maybe they are expecting him to tell them about an apprenticeship or serving in a Sunday school class.
None of these are necessarily bad things, but they are not part of Voddie’s answer. Instead he says, “If you are serious about serving the Lord, get married, pray that he gives you a house filled with children, and bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord.” There is no greater ministry, he says, than to get married and have children.
Wouldn’t it be better to hop on a plane to Haiti and work with orphans for a couple of months? It certainly is easier and more glamorous, and it takes far less commitment.
We have a plethora of young women in the church who are willing to travel the globe for Jesus but not many who are willing to do the hard work of digging in, planting foundations, and loving a husband and children. It is easier to serve children you can leave behind after a few months than it is to serve your own. It is easier to serve strangers we meet on the streets whom we will never see again than it is to love our own families.
Titus 2 commands the Older Women to instruct the younger woman that they are to love their husbands and children and to keep house. But sadly, there has been a dirth in Titus 2 Older women instructing the younger women, and one consequence is a dirth in young women being married.
We live in a period of incredible decline for marriage. The one thing to which young women are commended to in Titus is the one thing they are not doing in our time.
According to the US census data, in 1962 over half of 21-year-olds were married. Yet in 2018 only 8.8 percent of 21-year-olds were married. In 1962, 90 percent of people were married by the time they were 30 years old. Today only 30 percent of people ages 18-34 are married. In 1950, the median age for a woman’s first marriage was 20.5. In 2018 it was 28. According to the Pew Research Center, the median age for first marriage has hit its highest point on record: 30 years old for men and 28 years for women.
Sadly, as the US. Marriage rate has declined, the rate of unmarried couples living together has increased. According to US census data among people ages 18-24, cohabitation is now more prevalent than living with a spouse. Nine percent lived with an unmarried partner in 2018, compared to seven percent who lived with a spouse. Fifty years ago, living with an unmarried partner was rare. Only 0.1 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds and 0.2 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds lived with an unmarried partner, according to the Current Population Survey.
The plummeting marriage rates may only be matched by the plummeting birth rates. The birth rate in the US is at an all-time low. It is far below replacement rates, meaning that if something does not happen soon, this nation will experience incredible decline economically and in all other ways of measurement.
In addition to these birth rates, another number tells why there may be so few Titus 2 older women teaching the goodness of marriage, and that number is in regards to divorce. In Matthew 19, Jesus was asked by the Pharisees if it was lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all. In that day, it was rare if impossible for a woman to divorce her husband. Now the shoe has flipped. If the Pharisees were to question Jesus today, they might ask “Is it lawful for a woman to divorce her husband for any reason at all?”
And this is what we are seeing. The American Sociological Association conducted a large study on divorce, which found that women initiate two-thirds of all divorces. This is a staggering 69%. They found an even higher rate, around 90%, for divorces initiated by women with a college education.
It is women, empowered by no fault court laws and a court system, that then favors them whether they are the party actually at fault or not, that are driving the divorce rates.
And speaking of any reason at all. Here are the top nine reasons given in one study on why women divorce their husbands. 1. Indifference or cluelessness of the husband to their feelings; 2. Small gestures and reassurances are missing; 3. Money problems; 4. Needs not being met at home; 5. Husbands who cheat on their wives; 6. Marriage not living up to expectations; 7. Substance abuse; 8. Lack of romance; 9. Physical and emotional abuse.
Of these nine reasons only one (number five) and maybe half of the nine (physical violence) is a legitimate reason that Christ would allow. The rest all come around to, “I didn’t get what I wanted, so I left and took the kids and everything with me. “ Its entirely wicked and selfish. It happens because women get into marriage looking for some kind of Disney experience that will help them find their ultimate joy and rather then give themselves to submitting to their husband and building up their household, they break their covenant and dishonor God. Then they turn around and teach the next generation that marriage isn’t worth it. Younger women should make sure they get their career going.
It shouldn’t be this way. Now, gratefully there are some mothers who are reclaiming a responsibility to be Titus 2 women. There are some who desire to train their daughters and prepare them for marriage. There are young ladies who though indoctrinated by the culture to despise their femininity, who are pushing back and do desire marriage. And some are single but by God’s providence haven’t had the opportunity to marriage yet and see it as an affliction which they pray God will remove.
What then should a young lady do to prepare for marriage? What can she do to prepare both to be a good wife but also to be a good prospect for marriage. Here is a non-exhaustive list of ten ways a woman can prepare or a mother can help her daughters prepare. This list is in no particular order.
1. Get in shape and watch what you eat: Like it or not, men are visual and if you want to attract a husband, be attractive. This doesn’t mean dress slutty or immodestly. But it means watch out for how you look. Don’t be vain but consider how you dress. Don’t be frumpy. There is truth to the phrase that men desire debt-free virgins without tattoos. Stay away from the tats but instead grow your hair out and take care of it. And be joyful. Be beautiful inside and out. And woman who are already married, you want to help your marriage. Consider how you look to your husband. Don’t think that now you have a husband, you can let yourself go. Now don’t be vain. Childbearing is beautiful and don’t be so worried about what it does to your body.
2. Watch out how you treat your father. Submit to your father and respect him. If you can’t submit to your father, how will you submit to your husband.
3. Develop your domestic skills. Learn to cook, clean, and keep house. The way to a man’s heart is through his stomach.
4. Be a Mother in the Church: Give yourself to serving God. While it may be good to work an outside job or go to school, these things shouldn’t keep you from serving in the church.
5. Study and meditate on scriptures that teach submission and women’s roles so you can hear God’s heart and not the world’s. Learn what the purpose of marriage is. Don’t let Disney and romance novels be your guide.
6. Don’t go into debt. You might want to go to college and that’s fine, but don’t go into debt to do it. And also realize that a college degree, especially advanced degrees will not move your status up in attractiveness to a potential husband. It may just make your pool of potential mates smaller.
7. Keep yourself Pure. Don’t give yourself away whether in person or online.
8. Be an approachable person while being careful not to be desperate. If you find a man who catches your eye, be available to him. Be careful of the kinds of signals you send off. Your humble quietness may come across as rude and unapproachable but on the flipside too chatty and friendly can come across as flirty or just make you one of the guys.
9. Learn about how to care for children.
10. Learn to pray.
For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. Ephesians 5:31
Here are snippets from an article by Dale Partridge. I encourage you to read the entire article. It is sorely needed today. Instead of supporting a lukewarm church, find a solid, biblical church to attend faithfully and support.
As for the pastoral dress, the suit has gone to the garbage and has been replaced with skinny jeans, a necklace, and a swoop-cut shirt that looks like a repurposed woman’s blouse. But it doesn’t stop there, we have pastors using phrases like “Do life together” and “love on each other” and “let go and let God” and “Share what’s on your heart.” In addition, more churches are ordaining women as pastors which is a direct attempt to flip the biblical order of feminine submission to husbands, fathers, and biblical elders upside down. In short, we have, in a very real way, emasculated the local church.
The gender-role distortion and infatuation with egalitarianism have contributed to great confusion in the church of what it means to be a biblical man or woman. It has left women fighting for leadership and left men without direction in their role in marriage, church, and family. In fact, I strongly believe this has been the enemy’s central strategy for this generation. He has influenced the church to such a place of feminine emotion that when the time comes for masculine boldness, fearlessness, sacrifice, and resolve, the church (and culture) will be grossly unprepared.
The feminism movement of the 21st century is not about noble female valuation, it’s about male domination. Furthermore, by now we must see that their movement does not have borders. Like the LGBTQ community, they seek to saturate every facet of public, personal, and spiritual life. This should, at the very least, cause alarm to the current local church and at the very most prepare us to fight strongly against it. Ultimately, we need both biblical shepherds and faithful women to see through the societal smoke and guard against this dangerous infiltration of effeminate culture.
Without reservation, we must be able to agree that the narrative of Christianity is not predominantly feminine. It includes women. It elevates women. It adores women. It honors women. But from the patriarchs and the prophets to the Messiah and the Apostles, biblical Christianity is predominantly masculine. It is robust and rugged. It has heart and it has hope. What it does not have is a sense of effeminate character. For this reason, we must examine why the church does. We must see the gap between the intense and costly Christianity seen in the Scriptures and our modern age’s frail and costless Christianity. We must find a way to restore alignment, to honor the masculinity of Christ and His men in the local church. For when men and women fall into their proper place the glory of God shines with heat. In a world that’s grown cold, finding the kindling to spark this flame will permit the church and her Gospel to burn brightly.
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind. 1 Corinthians 6:9
at the West’s embrace of Communism & Satanism. Been there, done that, he said.
“Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the (Communist) domestic practices,
which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past.” Source by Vlad Putin(Excerpts by henrymakow.com) We look in amazement at the processes underway in the countries which have been traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers of progress.
Of course, the social and cultural shocks that are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are none of our business; we are keeping out of this.
Some people in the West believe that an aggressive elimination of entire pages from their own history, “reverse discrimination” against the majority in the interests of a minority, and the demand to give up the traditional notions of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all of these are the mileposts on the path towards social renewal.
Listen, I would like to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep out of our business as well.
We have a different viewpoint, at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it would be more correct to put it this way – has a different opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture of our multi-ethnic nation.
The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness. Godspeed, hoist the flags as we say, go right ahead.
The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society.
The destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.
This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward.
The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what colour or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism. The obsessive emphasis on race is further dividing people, when the real fighters for civil rights dreamed precisely about erasing differences and refusing to divide people by skin colour. I specifically asked my colleagues to find the following quote from Martin Luther King: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by their character.” This is the true value. However, things are turning out differently there. By the way, the absolute majority of Russian people do not think that the colour of a person’s skin or their gender is an important matter. Each of us is a human being. This is what matters.
In a number of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communalizing chickens, but also communalizing women. One more step and you will be there.
Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether. Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracized.
“Parent number one” and “parent number two,” “‘birthing parent” instead of “mother,” and “human milk” replacing “breastmilk” because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.
Not to mention some truly monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is, the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age even capable of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.
Well, if someone likes this, let them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches, we will be guided by a healthy conservatism. That was a few years ago, when passions on the international arena were not yet running as high as they are now, although, of course, we can say that clouds were gathering even then.
Now, when the world is going through a structural disruption, the importance of reasonable conservatism as the foundation for a political course has skyrocketed – precisely because of the multiplying risks and dangers, and the fragility of the reality around us.
This conservative approach is not about an ignorant traditionalism, a fear of change or a restraining game, much less about withdrawing into our own shell. It is primarily about reliance on a time-tested tradition, the preservation and growth of the population, a realistic assessment of oneself and others, a precise alignment of priorities, a correlation of necessity and possibility, a prudent formulation of goals, and a fundamental rejection of extremism as a method. And frankly, in the impending period of global reconstruction, which may take quite long, with its final design being uncertain, moderate conservatism is the most reasonable line of conduct, as far as I see it. It will inevitably change at some point, but so far, do no harm – the guiding principle in medicine – seems to be the most rational one. Noli nocere, as they say.
Again, for us in Russia, these are not some speculative postulates, but lessons from our difficult and sometimes tragic history. The cost of ill-conceived social experiments is sometimes beyond estimation. Such actions can destroy not only the material, but also the spiritual foundations of human existence, leaving behind moral wreckage where nothing can be built to replace it for a long time….
The conservative views we hold are an optimistic conservatism, which is what matters the most. We believe stable, positive development to be possible. It all depends primarily on our own efforts. Of course, we are ready to work with our partners on common noble causes.
First Comment from ML Oh what I wouldn’t give to hear someone in the west say such words! It is bizarre how roles are now reversed and Russia is emerging as a stable, sane society….
(image: Maurice Joly 1821-1879, was a Jew named Joseph Levy with a history of plagiarism.)
The assumption is that since Protocols appeared some 40 years after Joly’s Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work.
But the Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the “Protocols of Zion” are 100% authentic. The Protocols are the basis of the New World Order (Communism)which seeks to induct mankind into Satanism by “destroying every collective force not our own” (Protocols 16-4), namely race, religion, nation, and family. This is the explanation for the promotion of gender dysphoria (destroy marriage & family), migration & miscegenation (race) and globalism (nation.) Meanwhile,
the church (religion) has been sabotaged and the word “God” banned from public discourse.
This is the explanation for the fake pandemic which has oppressed mankind for the past two years. From July 30, 2008
By Henry Makow PhD
It is forbidden to mention the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” (1905) without the Disclaimer that, of course, they are a “forgery” of Maurice Joly’s “Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu” (1864.) The assumption is that sinceProtocols appeared some 40 years after Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work. But the Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the “Protocols of Zion” are authentic.
I have already argued that the two documents are neither similar nor derivative, although they have some lines and words in common. “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is essentially a brilliant Master Plan for dispossession and tyranny, i.e. the New World Order. It is the key to understanding our present predicament. (This is not a condemnation of all Jews, only the nucleus of bankers and high-level Masons directing this diabolical plot against the human race.)
“Dialogue in Hell” was a veiled Masonic Jewish attack on Napoleon III, an example of how they championed liberalism to undermine the Old Order and usurp power, as described in the Protocols themselves. (The author of Protocols is contemptuous of liberalism and all egalitarian programs. They are just gimmicks to manipulate the masses.)KERRY BOLTON
Reading Kerry Bolton’s monograph “The Protocols of Zion In Context”(Renaissance Press, 2003) it became obvious that Joly was plagiarizing from The Protocols and not vice-versa.
Joly, a Jew whose real name was Joseph Levy, was a lifelong Mason and member of the “Lodge of Mizraim” where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge, founder of the
Alliance Israalite Universelle and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.
The plot is described in the Protocols as “centuries-old.” It most likely predates “Dialogue.” Joly was well versed in the Protocols and borrowed from it to flesh out the unpopular authoritarian position of Machiavelli, which he ascribed to Napoleon III.
Joly, who committed suicide in 1879, was in the habit of “borrowing.” He is accused of plagiarizing a popular novel by Eugene Sue, namely “Les Mystares du Paris.” (1845) Also, his work is predated by another of Cremieux’s proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, “Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau.” (1850)
In 1884 Mme. Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian General living in Paris, hired Joseph Schorst, a member of Joly’s Mizraim Lodge to obtain sensitive information. For the sum of 2500 francs, Schorst provided Glinka with “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” He was subsequently tracked down and murdered in Egypt.
The Tsarist government, already heavily infiltrated, sat on the document. Glinka subsequently gave it to a friend who passed it on to Professor Sergius A. Nilus, left, who published it for the first time in 1901.
After the Bolshevik Revolution, Nilus was arrested in Kiev in 1924, imprisoned and tortured. The President of the Court told him he had “done them incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols.” (“Waters Flowing Eastward”by Paquita de Shishmareff, 1999, pp.74-76.)
CONCLUSION
If your plan for World Domination leaked out, what would you do? Would you admit it? “You got me! My bad!”
No, you’d employ an army of ciphers to convince everyone the document is a hoax motivated by “prejudice” and “anti-Semitism.” They have executed this “damage control” perfectly, a measure of their power to deceive even when the ugly truth is made public.
(of course, they couldn’t do it without goyem traitors i.e. Freemasons)
This is the only Conspiracy that has prevailed in spite of the Blueprint being freely available. It demonstrates the credulity (or venality) of the intelligentsia and the masses.
They have colonized our minds first. We cannot name our oppressor for fear of being accused of “antisemitism.”
It’s as though Black slaves working on cotton plantations were taught it was “racist” or “bigoted” to mention the White slave driver. Since the majority of Jews are ignorant of this plot, and are manipulated like everyone else, racism is a ploy to divert attention from a very dire problem.
The Illuminati (top-rung Masonic Jews and their non-Jewish allies) have distributed some wealth and power to the masses (liberalism, socialism) as a way of securing ultimate power for themselves. According to the Protocols, they will eventually withdraw these benefits once their “invisible government” is invincible. The “war on terror” should be seen in this context.
In my view, “Protocols Deniers” are complicit in this Conspiracy, which is responsible for most human suffering and will lead to a great deal more. As a Jew, I don’t want this responsibility on my head, or on other innocent Jews or Masons.
Necessary explanation very well done. Much appreciated.
In the U.S., at least, a definition of the word “protocol” may be necessary as it is not a word in common usage.
Here is one of Webster’s: “An original copy, draft, minute, or record of a document or transaction.”
This fits in exactly with the known history that Schorst stole these speaker’s notes from the lectern in an auditorium where they were being used in a series of lectures to a secret, select audience. Again, there is no reason to believe these protocols are static. Being that this plot was self-admitted as being already ancient, reason suggests that it is constantly updated. For instance, these protocols mention the control of printing presses. Today they would refer to control of the Internet.
I recently asked a married couple who have three kids, none of whom are yet teens, “Who are the most important people in your family?”
Like all good moms and dads of this brave new millennium, they answered, “Our kids!”
“Why?” I then asked. “What is it about your kids that give them that status?” And like all good moms and dads of this brave new millennium, they couldn’t answer the question other than the fumble with appeals to emotion.
So, I answered the question for them. “There is no reasonable thing that gives your children that status.”
I went on to point out that many, if not most, of the problems they’re having with their kids – typical stuff, these days – are the result of treating their children as if they, their marriage, and their family exist because of the kids when it is, in fact, the other way around. Their kids exist because of them and their marriage, and thrive because they’ve created a stable family.
Furthermore, without them, their kids wouldn’t eat well, have the nice clothes they wear, live in the nice home in which they live, enjoy the great vacations they enjoy, and so on. Instead of lives that are relatively carefree (despite the drama to the contrary they occasionally manufacture), their children would be living a life full of worry and want.
This issue is really the heart of the matter. People my age know it’s the heart of the matter because when we were kids, it was clear to us that our parents were the most important people in our families. And that, right there, is why we respected our parents and that, right there, is why we looked up to adults in general. Yes, Virginia once upon a time in the United States of America, children were second-class citizen citizens to their advantage.
It’s also clear to us – I speak, of course, in general terms, albeit accurate – that our parents’ marriages were more important to them than their relationships with us. Therefore, we did not sleep in their beds or interrupt their conversations. The family meal at home with regard is more important than afterschool activities. Mom and dad talked more – a lot more – with one another then they talked with you. For lack of pedestals, we emancipated earlier and much more successfully then have children since.
The most important person in an army is a general. The most important person in a corporation is the CEO. The most important person in a classroom is the teacher. And the most important person in the family are the parents.
The most important thing about children is a need to prepare them properly for responsible citizenship. The primary objective should not be raising a straight A student who excels at three sports, earns a spot on the Olympic swim team, goes to an A-list university and becomes a prominent brain surgeon. The primary objective is to raise a child such that community and culture are strengthened.
“Our child is the most important person in our family” is a first step toward raising a child who feels entitled.
You don’t want that. Unbeknownst to your child, he doesn’t need that. And neither does America.
Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. Proverbs 22:6
(This looks like an official Province of British Columbia sign but it may be a meme.)
Communism is the religion of the satanist (Cabalist) Jewish central bankers who control the West through the WEF.All politicians work for them. Communism is
seeks to steal and destroy everything of value, especially your soul. For example, transgenderism and cancel culture have nothing to do with minority rights. They’re designed to destroy Christian civilization.Cabalist Jews & Freemasons are first & foremost destroyers.This is the real reason for antisemitism. The fact it cannot be mentioned illustrates just how far this deadly cancer has progressed.Mankind has been inducted into this satanic cult which requires total conformity.
The frenzied Russophobic groupthinkthat’s currently reverberating throughout virtually the entire Western militarist-corporate media and citizenry is staggering to witness. One can do nothing but stand back in awe at the indoctrination that’s suffocating us all.
The Russiagate nonsense and Covid Cult hysteria were the worst mob mentalities one had ever witnessed. However neither of those reaches the level of this non-stop animus against Putin and Russia.
Moreover, the cavalier way so many liberals and neo-cons are now dismissing the long-held Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine as it comes to nuclear war is astonishingly dismaying. Glibly advocating for a no-fly zone ultimately means nuclear war.
Chillingly, there no longer appear to be any sane heads left in Washington – personally sanctioning Putin and Lavrov obviously severs diplomatic relations, severed diplomatic relations historically has often been a prelude to war. The U.S. even has national politicians and apoplectic talking heads calling for the assassination of Putin. Brazen criminal violations of international law are now rationally discussed under the aegis of learned gentility on mainstream media. That this taunting could quickly devolve the world into a nuclear war does not seem to bother anyone.
Across the spectrum in the U.S. – from the humanitarian [sic] interventionist liberals to the crazy neo-con warmongers – it’s all Russophobic diatribes all day, all night. Any rational knowledgeable analysts who attempt to present the reasonable Russian position are immediately scorned and ridiculed and dismissed as Kremlin propagandists.
That (Russian Defence Minister) Shoigu is desperately trying to minimize human casualties in Ukraine despite the far-right militias bedding down in hospitals and theaters is ignored.
This extremely dangerous mass psychosis that’s washing over nearly the entire Western hemisphere (except for Latin America) must somehow be transcended before the likelihood that two nuclear armed superpowers clash increases to the point of no return.
——First Comment by Whoopy 99 A former KGB person (Yuri Bezmenov) living in the US since 1975 was astounded by how easy citizens of the US were so easily brainwashed. He said no other country that he knew of was that easy to dumb down. There is a light in the tunnel, I’ve been getting information that more and more people are seeing the light. Light. As time goes on, I think the truth will get out.
