Edward Hendrie- Hamas is Controlled by Mossad

hamas-rifles.jpeg

Mossad Created Hamas to Act as Agent ProvocateursThe subterfuge of provocation by Hamas justifying 

a retaliatory response by Israel is exactly the strategy of Israel. 

Indeed, that is the purpose of Hamas.

by Edward Hendrie(henrymakow.com) The October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas on Israel from the Gaza Strip were orchestrated by Mossad. Hamas acted as agent provocateurs under covert guidance from Mossad. The attacks were planned to justify the brutal and genocidal by Israel against the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. 
Below is an excerpt from Bloody Zionexplaining the creation of Hamas by Israel.
The Israeli government secretly funded and encouraged the growth and activities of the rabidly anti-Jewish terrorist organization, Hamas. Hamas fulfills a two-fold goal: undermining the influence of the secular Palestinian liberation organization, Fatah (Movement for the National Liberation of Palestine), and creating a hostile Islamic religious opposition to the Jewish state that was affiliated with the surrounding hostile Islamic countries. Hassane Zerouky explains:
According to the Israeli weekly Koteret Rashit (October 1987), “The Islamic associations as well as the university had been supported and encouraged by the Israeli military authority” in charge of the (civilian) administration of the West Bank and Gaza. “They [the Islamic associations and the university] were authorized to receive money payments from abroad. Meanwhile, the members of Fatah (Movement for the National Liberation of Palestine) and the Palestinian Left were subjected to the most brutal form of repression.”
The Islamists set up orphanages and health clinics, as well as a network of schools, workshops which created employment for women as well as system of financial aid to the poor. And in 1978, they created an “Islamic University” in Gaza. “The military authority was convinced that these activities would weaken both the PLO and the leftist organizations in Gaza.” At the end of 1992, there were six hundred mosques in Gaza. Thanks to Israel’s intelligence agency Mossad (Israel’s Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks) , the Islamists were allowed to reinforce their presence in the occupied territories.
* * *

hendrie-book.jpeg

The Hamas then launched a carefully timed campaign of attacks against civilians, one day before the meeting between Palestinian and Israeli negotiators, regarding the formal recognition of Israel by the National Palestinian Council. These events were largely instrumental in the formation of a Right wing Israeli government following the May 1996 elections.
* * *
The Hamas had built its strength through its various acts of sabotage of the peace process, in a way which was compatible with the interests of the Israeli government. In turn, the latter sought in a number of ways, to prevent the application of the Oslo accords. In other words, Hamas was fulfilling the functions for which it was originally created: to prevent the creation of a Palestinian State. And in this regard, Hamas and Ariel Sharon, see eye to eye; they are exactly on the same wave length.
Hamas acts as agent provocateurs under the control of the Mossad. The subterfuge of provocation by Hamas justifying a retaliatory response by Israel is exactly the strategy of Israel as explained by Moshe Sharett, the first foreign minister of Israel and prime minister of Israel from 1954-1956. Sharett stated that Israel must keep a state of “moral tension.” Henry Makow,Illuminati: The Cult That Hijacked the World, at 151 (2011). Sharett said that in order to keep that moral tension it is necessary for Israel to “invent dangers.” Id. The invented dangers act as provocations for Israel to retaliate. Hamas is just such an invented danger. That is in keeping with the Mossad motto: “By way of deception, thou shalt do war.”

https://www.henrymakow.com

How did Teddy Roosevelt handle violent crime and rape against young children? from his Autobiography

The views I then held and now hold were expressed in a memorandum made in the case of a Negro convicted of the rape of a young Negro girl, practically a child. A petition for his pardon had been sent me.

WHITE HOUSE, Washington, D. C.,
August 8, 1904.
The application for the commutation of sentence of John W. Burley is denied. This man committed the most hideous crime known to our laws, and twice before he has committed crimes of a similar, though less horrible, char acter. In my judgment there is no justification whatever for paying heed to the allegations that he is not of sound mind, allegations made after the trial and conviction. No body would pretend that there has ever been any such degree of mental unsoundness shown as would make people
even consider sending him to an asylum if he had not com mitted this crime. Under such circumstances he should certainly be esteemed sane enough to suffer the penalty for his monstrous deed. I have scant sympathy with the plea of insanity advanced to save a man from the conse quences of crime, when unless that crime had been com mitted it would have been impossible to persuade any re sponsible authority to commit him to an asylum as insane. Among the most dangerous criminals, and especially among those prone to commit this particular kind of offense, there are plenty of a temper so fiendish or so brutal as to be in compatible with any other than a brutish order of intelli gence ; but these men are nevertheless responsible for their acts; and nothing more tends to encourage crime among such men than the belief that through the plea of insanity or any other method it is possible for them to escape paying the just penalty of their crimes. The crime in question is one to the existence of which we largely owe the existence of that spirit of lawlessness which takes form in lynching. It is a crime so revolting that the criminal is not entitled to one particle of sympathy from any human being. It is essential that the punishment for it should be not only as certain, but as swift as possible. The jury in this case did their duty by recommending the infliction of the death penalty. It is to be regretted that we do not have special provision for more summary dealing with this type of cases. The more we do what in us lies to secure certain and swift justice in dealing with these cases, the more effectively do we work against the growth of that lynching spirit which is so full of evil omen for this people, because it seeks to avenge one infamous crime by the commission of another of equal infamy.
The application is denied and the sentence will be car ried into effect.
(Signed) THEODORE EOOSEVELT.