The Davos Revolution And The Re-Making Of Civilization

The Great Reset dangles before us: a global public-private partnership that follows the mystic path of social feelings, the holy writ of consensus politics, and the self-anointed prophets of international finance… all watched over by the priests of digital technology. It’s the operating system of the collective New Age, an algorithmic-technocratic revolution – maximum efficiency for managed harmony – and of course, it’s all for the “greater good.”

the davos revolution and the re making of civilization

“A crisis is a productive event.” – Guy Parmelin, President of the Swiss Confederation.

Since the 1970s, the ski-resort community of Davos, Switzerland, has frequently been a gathering place for global elites during the month of January.

Hosted by the World Economic Forum, an organization granted special status by the Swiss government, the Davos conference brings together an array of selected power-brokers; governors of central banks, international financiers, heads-of-state, UN leaders, CEOs from the largest corporations, and well-placed media personalities.

To be a “Davos Man” typically means you’ve embraced an international perspective, and have the ability to influence long-term shifts in political and economic culture. You’re part of an elite club with the self-anointed task of directing global change.

Because of Covid complications, this year’s WEF annual meeting was postponed, and has since been re-scheduled with the hope of gathering in Singapore later this August.

Nevertheless, the last week of January 2021 still witnessed a significant WEF event; a virtual conference titled the Davos Agenda, which could be live-monitored by anyone willing to take the time.

What was front-and-center of this online meeting? The Great Reset.

Before we go further, it’s important to note that this article only scratches the surface of what transpired. And how could it do anything but?

The Davos Agenda ran five days, each being 10-to-12 hours long, and with most time slots holding multiple and simultaneous panel discussions.

To give you an idea of the schedule, the first day – Monday, January 25 – had a total of 29 individual sessions. It was information overload.

It also must be stated that not everybody who officially participated was on the same page as the World Economic Forum.

For example, Benjamin Netanyahu gave a talk outlining how he purposefully cut through the red tape to secure Covid vaccinations, making sure his nation had the supplies it needed.

His approach didn’t fit with the WEF consensus of “vaccine solidarity,” to act globally before your national interests – after all, as another speaker explained, “the vaccine needs to be a public good.”

The phrase “vaccine nationalism” was used throughout the week, a disparaging term for those who sought national health goals above global collaboration.

Another example was Brazil’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ernesto Araujo, who publicly encouraged the United States to stay the course as the “superpower of freedom.”

Araujo went on to say that Brazil desired an open economy based on liberty, noting that this would challenge the global emergence of a rising “techno-totalitarianism.”

“I’m not a great fan of the concept of the Great Reset,” Araujo stated, explaining that while he generally supported ideas like sustainable development, there was a problem. The Great Reset was missing “freedom and democracy.”

Most others, however, were either on-board or otherwise playing the game.

President of China, Xi Jinping – introduced by Klaus Schwab, founder of the WEF – stressed collaborative action; we must create a new and global economic model, we must “abandon ideological prejudice and jointly follow a path of peaceful coexistence,” and we must bring “prosperity for all.”

A “shared future for mankind,” he explained, is necessary. This would include strengthening global economic governance, committing to the UN system of world law, and supporting the World Health Organization as they build “a global community of health for all.” But who will lead the way?

The rest of his speech focused on how China, as a “modern socialist country,” is blazing the trail, including the Belt and Road initiative, and the promotion of a “new type of international relations.”

His speech wrapped up with words of solidarity,

“There is only one Earth and one shared future for humanity. As we cope with the current crisis and endeavor to make a better day for everyone, we need to stand united and work together.

“We have been shown time and again that to beggar thy neighbor, to go it alone, and to slip into arrogant isolation will always fail. Let us all join hands and let multilateralism light our way toward a community with a shared future for mankind.”

Klaus responded by thanking Xi Jinping for “such an important speech, which at this crucial movement in history, provides us with a truly comprehensive framework for shaping the future.”

China was often applauded during the Davos Agenda, being admired for its digital leap forward. But there were some concerns, albeit framed through a globalist worldview.

For example, a few hours after the Chinese leader spoke, the UN Secretary General pointed to the growing rift between China and the United States, noting that both countries were dividing the world with their separate agendas. What was needed, he said, was “one global economy with universal respect for international law.”

Another star performance was from Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission.

It only took a few minutes before she slapped the former Trump administration, saying, “democracy itself might have been permanently damaged in the last four years.”

And like others throughout the week, she linked Covid with climate change. Ursula was clear; “We must learn from this crisis. We have to change the way we live and do business.”

Her speech pointed to Europe’s very own Green New Deal, the EU’s push for carbon neutrality by 2050, and how private companies will face stronger regulatory diligence.

Regarding digital governance – for it’s vital that online platforms curb fake news while affirming democracy – Ursula called for the United States to join the EU and, together, create a worldwide digital rulebook “based on our values.”

All of the above – like the early pandemic collaboration between the EU, the WEF and the Gates Foundation – represents how “Europe is determined to contribute to this global common good.”

At the end of her prepared talk, she affirmed to Schwab that new alliances will be necessary:

“This is what we will work for – and I know I can count on you and the World Economic Forum to help us build it.”

Schwab was excited, afterwards saying that this speech represented the practical meaning of the Great Reset.

He paraphrased a take-away; what we need is a “values based, social governance system” connected through a digital web.

With the Reset in mind, the Davos Agenda focused on seven interlocking subjects: “How to Save the Planet,” “Fairer Economies,” “Tech for Good,” “Society & Future of Work,” “Better Business,” “Healthy Futures,” and “Beyond Geopolitics.”

A mountain of talking points emerged from these encompassing themes. However, we will only highlight a few:

1. Covid: Speaking on the pandemic, Li Xin of China-based Caixin Media, told us this “crisis should not be wasted.” Nor was it.

We were constantly reminded that Covid revealed our interdependence while pointing to the problem of nationalism.

Old values and conventions no longer work; the global supply chain needs to be digitized, the World Health Organization must be empowered, we need a universal healthcare system, there must be a centralizing program to pool national health data, and economic recovery should be tied to vaccination criteria.

“You’re going to need the vaccine year-after-year-after-year,” we were told.

2. Climate: If Covid was our existential crisis, climate is our planetary emergency.

And in order to meet this supposed planetary challenge, the world must pursue a significant reduction in carbon emissions, all the way to net zero by 2050 at the latest.

This requires nothing less than a complete overhaul of energy production, the transportation sector, all industry and especially agriculture, and our personal behavior.

Net-zero isn’t an abstract exercise. New Zealand and the United Kingdom have already passed legislation binding them to net-zero by 2050, and similar proposals are on the table in Canada, South Korea, and the European Union.

Moreover, the Group of Thirty – a high-level consultative body comprised of the most influential figures in central banking and international financing, many with WEF connections – is pushing for net-zero across the spectrum of global economic activity. [1]

In the United States, just a few days after Davos, the National Academies released their decarbonization report – “a technical blueprint and policy manual” – thus creating a roadmap for net-zero by mid-century. [2] And yes, there are working links between the Academies and the WEF.

So it was no surprise that on January 27 – day three of the Davos Agenda – John Kerry, President Biden’s Special Envoy for Climate, reminded the WEF audience how his government is “making climate central to foreign policy planning and national security preparedness.”

Kerry explained that “a zero emissions future” will bring new opportunities for green growth: “To use the President’s words, to ‘build back better’ from the global economic crisis.”

Kerry reinforced that climate is everybody’s responsibility: “The whole world has to come to this table to solve the problem.”

3. Social Justice: An inclusive world for all was the mantra – unless, of course, you’re not in agreement with the global consensus. Nevertheless, social justice themes are directly bolted to the framework of the Great Reset.

From racial issues to gender claims, social justice leaves its mark. However, a range of other justices needs to be considered, such as eco-justice, climate justice, and vaccine justice. Each of these justice-issues were attached, in some measure, to the Reset structure that was unfolding.

In the panel on creating a New Social Contract, economic justice was front-and-center.

A Global Social Protection Fund must come into play, pairing international debt relief to a universal social-economy of “Living Wages and Living Communities.”

On the same panel, James Quincey, CEO of Coca-Cola, described how his company is addressing social justice by fashioning an internal, racial/social economic ecosystem.

More than that, industry-leading corporations must influence smaller companies to follow suit, especially those in their supply chains.

Entire sectors need to re-align their economic models to social justice priorities, and that’s the essence of Stakeholder Capitalism.

4. Stakeholder Capitalism:Unlike shareholder capitalism shaped by company owners and direct market forces, stakeholder capitalism takes a social approach.

Since the early 1970s, Schwab has been an advocate of the stakeholder model. Back then it was mainly geared to incorporating labor, union, and government interests in corporate decision-making.

Today, Schwab is aggressively pushing a grander vision – capitalism in service to the planet while supporting social causes.

In a WEF article released a few days before the Davos Agenda, Schwab wrote:

“The planet is thus the center of the global economic system, and its health should be optimized in the decisions made by all other stakeholders. The same interconnectedness can be observed for the people who live on the planet… it is incumbent on all of us as global citizens to optimize the well-being of all.”

In other words, capitalism bends to the demands of special interest groups and “green government.”

Corporations, industries and sectors – including financial institutions – must shift their business models to appreciate and accelerate these new global norms.

How will this be ascertained?

In September 2020, the WEF released its White Paper, Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism, which envisioned a common standard for “sustainable value creation.”[3]

What emerged was a set of principles and benchmarks coalescing around three headings: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG).

As a whole, the ESG framework is to dovetail with the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

To put it in acronym parlance, the ESG process is the WEF mechanism to achieve the SDGs.

Upholding the ESG are four pillars: Governance, Planet, People, and Prosperity.

Supporting these four categories are 21 core metrics, along with 34 expanded metrics to enable a deeper audit – for that is essentially what’s happening, an audit to ensure compliance and cooperation.

Hence, each metric acts as an information node in a detailed review process, and in using this tool, businesses and institutions can measure their purpose and behavior, taking into account environmental issues and social expectations.

Does the board have gender and minority representation?

Has it taken climate risk into consideration, and what internal policies are being implemented to achieve net-zero?

How much land does the company own, and what is its relationship to key biodiversity areas? Wage and age and gender employment categories, healthcare support, collective agreements, water consumption, community investment and taxation levels; the list is long, incorporating financial details, energy usage, supply chain relationships, waste disposal, lobbying efforts, social ethics and diversity indicators, and on and on.

The trajectory of corporate governance, therefore, will no longer be “business as usual.”

Governance, rather, will need to solicit and incorporate input from approving stakeholders, including special interest groups, unions and labor associations, government departments, and international agencies.

In other words, stakeholder capitalism is a planetary public-private partnership that hinges on social license.

After the ESG process is complete and satisfactory, your “purpose driven company” will be certified within a global ecosystem of regulators and industry associations.

This status will be the key to unlocking investment funds, favorable insurance pricing, and positive consumer recognition.

Without achieving ESG benchmarks, however, your business may be cut off from licensing, funding sources, supply chains, government contracts, or marketplace access.

Presently, ESG exists as screening criteria used by some investors, but the WEF agenda extends into a wider and more permanent realm.

So long as your business is complying with the global narrative, your company can make money. Those who don’t play ball will be pushed out of the game.

Welcome to “corporate cancel culture.”

5. Digitization: Nothing short of a total, global commitment will suffice if we want to save the planet, or so the narrative goes.

Therefore, we need powerful new tools to manage our way forward. Digitization becomes the tie that binds, and data the lifeblood of our new technocratic era.

In this not-too futuristic vision, the information collected from our lifestyle choices will be aggregated, analyzed, and used to modify behaviors for planetary outcomes.

One of the Davos themes was “Smart Cities,” noting that urban zones are rich information ecosystems.

Here’s an emerging possibility: In our “smart cities,” street-based sensors will talk to smart cars, and payment apps will be notified of your movement, automatically deducting carbon taxes or travel credits from your account. It’s hardly far-fetched.

The overall trajectory is deeper integration with Artificial Intelligence, Central Bank Digital Currencies, universal healthcare data networks, smart supply chains, and more automation.

Even greater feats are before us: through blockchain technologies, everything that can be cataloged has the potential to become a numerically assigned asset.

Therefore, the life-cycle of anything can be theoretically traced, from raw resource to manufacturer to point-of-consumption. You, too, can become a number in the age of “managed harmony.”

What is not harmonious, however, is contrary thinking and behavior – anything unaligned with approved global narratives.

Conservative values, national determination and traditional notions of sovereignty, personal rights attached to private property: If such concepts and beliefs are antithetical to the Great Reset, then they are part of the great problem.

On the last day, US Senator Gillibrand called for accountability regarding right-wing news outlets.

More than that, she stressed the need for oversight of social media platforms, holding them to account for allowing right-wing messages to proliferate.

She then affirmed these positions by appealing to her faith; that we need to love one another.

For conservative Christians, the idea of the Great Reset strikes at something deeper than talking points. The real question becomes one of salvation.

Who ultimately saves the world? Is Jesus Christ our messiah, or does collective humanity redeem itself by saving the planet?

It appears we are at a Romans 1 crossroad, faced with the question of worshiping and serving the creation, or the Creator.

And thus, the Reset dangles before us: a global public-private partnership that follows the mystic path of social feelings, the holy writ of consensus politics, and the prophets of international finance… all watched over, and guided by, the priests of technology.

It’s the operating system of the collective New Age, an algorithmic-technocratic revolution – maximum efficiency for managed harmony – and of course, it’s all for the “greater good.”

Maybe the concerns expressed by Brazil’s Foreign Minister – the looming dangers of a rising techno-totalitarianism – are worth considering.

About the author: Carl Teichrib is the author of Game of Gods: The Temple of Man in the Age of Re-Enchantment.

FTC Takes Censorship To A Whole New Level: Charges Man For Questioning Vaccines And Promoting Zinc And Vitamin D

As the covid-19 scandalcontinues, authorities are increasingly using censorshipand intimidation tactics to control the narrative and shut down the truth.

ftc takes censorship to a whole new level charges man for questioning vaccines and promoting zinc and vitamin d

Credit: KSDK

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is taking censorship to a whole new level and is targeting anyone who promotes a healthy immune system to combat SARS-CoV-2.

The FTC recently charged a St. Louis man for making fraudulent claims about covid-19.

The FTC is charging Eric Nepute and Quickwork LLC in a federal court for the heinous crime of advertising zinc and vitamin D to combat covid-19.

Nepute is charged with ten counts of violating the Covid-19 Consumer Protection Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act.

The FTC alleges that Nepute falsely advertised his products, which contain vitamin D and zinc – two important supplements that are scientifically proven to block viral replication and prevent hospitalization.

It’s Now A Crime To Help People Treat And Overcome Infections

In 2020, the U.S. Congress quietly installed a new censorship clause in a coronavirus emergency response and relief package.

In HR 133, Congress gave the FTC supreme authority to target, arrest and fine anyone who doesn’t follow the government’s narrative on lock downs, masks, quarantines and vaccines.

Anyone who promotes a healthy immune system can now be charged and fined for the “criminal” act of helping people treat and overcome respiratory infection.

It’s now obvious that there is a global conspiracy to deprive people of their rights and make the population so ignorant and scared, they become sick and dependent on a system that will ultimately kill them off.

This conspiracy seeks to restrain and eradicate healthy people and oppress everyone until they are subjected to forced propaganda, obedience training, behavioral controls and nefarious levels of medical experimentation.

Eric Nepute is the first person in the US to be charged under this new statute. According to the commission’s complaint, the Nepute Wellness Center could be fined $43,792 for each violation.

This attack could steal nearly half a million dollars from Nepute, not only putting a gag order against him, but also shuttering his entire practice.

“I feel that I have not done anything wrong,” Nepute stated.

“I encourage everyone to live a healthy lifestyle during this unprecedented time. My attorneys are reviewing the complaint and I have no further comments at this time.”

Acting Chairwoman Rebecca Kelly Slaughter said the FTC is “has quickly put to use its new authority to stop false marketing claims related to the pandemic.”

FTC And Big Tech Working Together To Take Down Helpful Information That Interferes With Vaccine Compliance

Nepute posted a video last April encouraging viewers to drink tonic water containing quinine.

The quinine is the original ingredient found in hydroxychloroquine, an effective prophylactic that helps cells absorb zinc and therefore block virus replication.

“Have about 3 to 4 ounces a day of that Schweppes tonic water and take at least 50 to 100 milligrams of zinc. I’ll say that again, 50 to 100 milligrams of zinc. Do it every day as a preventative,” Nepute said in the video.

Nepute included a “disclaimer” — telling viewers this wasn’t professional medical advice. The video received millions of views on Facebook but was quickly deemed “misinformation” by the Big Tech censors.

The FTC, apparently working with Big Tech, began to target Nepute. They quickly went after his product “Wellness Warrior” — which includes both vitamin D and zinc.

Nepute’s claims, “COVID-19 patients who get enough vitamin D are 52% less likely to die” and “those who get enough vitamin D are 77% less likely to get the disease” were targeted by the FTC despite there being studies to back up these claims.

The commission wants to stop Nepute and Quickwork from ever making health claims about vitamin D or zinc in the future.

FTC Chairwoman Rebecca Slaughter was most interested in punishing Nepute for questioning, comparing and criticizing covid-19 vaccinations.

“The defendants’ claims that their products can stand in for approved COVID-19 vaccines are particularly troubling: We need to be doing everything we can to stop bogus health claims that endanger consumers,” Slaughter said.

Under these new FTC powers, targeted individuals (who promote healthy solutions to covid-19) are automatically deemed guilty. They are not innocent until proven guilty.

The presumption of innocence is a core principle of due process rights, enshrined in the US Constitution. When vaccine science (and all its associated fraud) is accepted as the ultimate truth, then anyone who is targeted by the FTC for making “false claims” is not receiving due process at all.

These targeted individuals are being forced to submit their speech, beliefs and allegiance to the vaccine orthodoxy, which continues to subvert the rule of law.

Deagel Goes Dark – Deep State Sourced Website ‘Ghosts’ Its 2025 Warning About The Culling Of America As Putin And Russia Warn Of ‘Rapid And Harsh Response’ Should West ‘Cross Red Line’

By Stefan Stanford – All News Pipeline – Live Free Or Die

Going back many years now, ANP has reported many times upon a mysterious website that has kept meticulous track of military equipment numbers across the planet, using groups such as the CIA, US State Department, US Department of Defense and others as their ‘sources’, and their absolutely bizarre forecasts of a greatly ‘depopulated’ Western world by the year 2025.

With one of their most recent ‘forecasts’ foretelling a fall of America’s population from 330 million to less than 100 million by the year 2025, a ‘forecast’ which they’ve been regularly adjusting downwards for the past 5 years+, we were caught by surprise upon opening an email from ANP reader ‘Jack’ this morning informing us that Deagel has completely removed all of their ‘forecasts’ for 2025, going with a strictly ‘military’ feel. 

With Deagel also removing their very lengthy explanation of why they felt major doom was ahead for America and the Western world, with that explanation previously blaming cascading financial troubles due to Covid-19 and the very real possibility of nuclear war in our futures, we’re also going to take a look within this story back at their reasons why they felt the world was heading into major trouble while things are heating up both abroad and here at home.

And while we’ve long been warning of Deagel’s forecast on ANP, with such stories called ‘tinfoil hat conspiracy theories’by those who don’t want to see the truth, a recent story on Doug Casey’s International Man titled “Doug Casey on the Shocking 2025 Deagel Forecast…War, Population Reduction and the Collapse of the West” warned of what could be “the biggest thing in world history.”

Doug Casey: I’ve got to say that I wasn’t familiar with Deagel—it keeps a low profile. Deagel is in the same business as Jane’s—which has been in the business of analyzing weapons systems for many decades. 

A look at the Deagel website, which is quite sophisticated, makes it clear we’re not dealing with some blogger concocting outrageous clickbait. It seems to be well-connected with defense contractors and government agencies like the CIA. 

They’ve predicted that about 70% of the US population, and about the same percentage in Europe, is going to disappear by 2025. It’s hard to believe that anybody in their position would make a forecast like that. There’s no logical business reason for it, especially since it was done before the COVID hysteria gripped the world. It stretches a reader’s credulity. 

Could it possibly happen? It would be the biggest thing in world history. 

Yet with those numbers ‘depopulated’ actually MUCH fewer than the Georgia Guidestones is calling for, with that‘mysterious monument’ erected by unknown ‘elitists‘ calling for a world population to ‘remain steady at 500 million’, which means a 7 BILLION ‘culling’ from what it currently is. 

(ANP NEEDS YOUR HELP: Donations and ad revenue are all that keep ANP online, so please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America’s future at this critical time in US history. With ‘slow-Joe’ Biden occupying the White House, and at a time of systematic, ‘big tech’censorship and widespread Democrat corruption, truthful media and alternative views are crucial.)

With Deagel’s previous 2025 forecast numbers showing nearly every Western nation hit with not only ‘depopulation’but financial collapse as well, we’re going to take a quick look here at their previous 2025 forecast explanation.

We documented that explanation in this October 17th story on ANP titled “Deagel Warns A Dangerous New Trend Is Taking Place That Will Overshadow The Coming Election, Covid-19 And The Democrat-Inspired Social Chaos Across America – ‘The most likely major event of the 2020’s could leave billions of casualties’ “

In 2014 we published a disclaimer about the forecast. In six years the scenario has changed dramatically. This new disclaimer is meant to single out the situation from 2020 onwards. Taking about the United States and the European Union as separated entities no longer makes sense. Both are the Western block, keep printing money and will share the same fate. 

After COVID we can draw two major conclusions: 

1) The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low intensity one. It was assumed but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt. 

2) The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so called Great Reset. 

The Great Reset; like the climate change, extinction rebellion, planetary crisis, green revolution, shale oil (…) hoaxes promoted by the system; is another attempt to slow down dramatically the consumption of natural resources and therefore extend the lifetime of the current system. It can be effective for awhile but finally won’t address the bottom-line problem and will only delay the inevitable. The core ruling elites hope to stay in power which is in effect the only thing that really worries them. 

The collapse of the Western financial system – and ultimately the Western civilization – has been the major driver in the forecast along with a confluence of crisis with a devastating outcome. As COVID has proven Western societies embracing multiculturalism and extreme liberalism are unable to deal with any real hardship. The Spanish flu one century ago represented the death of 40-50 million people. Today the world’s population is four times greater with air travel in full swing which is by definition a super spreader. The death casualties in today’s World would represent 160 to 200 million in relative terms but more likely 300-400 million taking into consideration the air travel factor that did not exist one century ago. So far, COVID death toll is roughly 1 million people. It is quite likely that the economic crisis due to the lockdowns will cause more deaths than the virus worldwide. 

With that explanation then going into the very real possibility of a full-scale nuclear war in our near futures, warning that Russia has been preparing for such a conflict since the year 2008 while China had been doing the same for over 20 years, Deagel, which has regularly kept track of military equipment and purchases, then warned a major war was near

Six years ago the likelihood of a major war was tiny. Since then it has grown steadily and dramatically and today is by far the most likely major event in the 2020s. The ultimate conflict can come from two ways. A conventional conflict involving at least two major powers that escalates into an open nuclear war. A second scenario is possible in the 2025-2030 timeframe. 

If there is not a dramatic change of course the world is going to witness the first nuclear war. The Western block collapse may come before, during or after the war. It does not matter. A nuclear war is a game with billions of casualties and the collapse plays in the hundreds of millions.

With Deagel making that nuclear war prediction back in October of 2020, we see in today’s headlines that warning now coming to possible fruition. As the Daily Mail had reported in this April 20th story titled “US must prepare for nuclear war: Strategic Command warns today’s unpredictable conflicts could escalate ‘rapidly’ where countries consider nuclear use as ‘their least bad option'”, should we continue down the mad path we’re on, nuclear war is a very real possibility.

Warning within that story that any such war might strike before most Americans even knew what hit them, Tucker Carlson also recently warned on his show that Joe Biden and Democrats insanely appear to be rapidly moving towards war with a country that could completely annihilate us, leaving potentially hundreds of millions dead should a long-term grid-down scenario be unleashed

And as the top-voted comment on this Breitbart story had pointed out, should any war break out between the US and Russia, China will be waiting to pounce. 

China’s biggest economic adversary is America. China’s biggest geographic adversary is Russia. How better for China to become the single strongest military and economy in the world, than to have her number two’s, take each other out. And they have the manchurian Biden throwing the first punch. Genius. Pure evil. But genius.

So with Doug Casey’s story warning of a potential ‘great die-off’ ahead, it also pointed out how there are many advantages to biological warfare over other types of warfare, so it will probably be featured. It’s probably inevitable, now that the technology has made it practical. What are the advantages of biowar? What might wargaming generals like about it?

First, it doesn’t destroy materiel. That’s a huge plus. After all, what’s the point of conquering a country if all you have to show for it is a smoking radioactive ruin? That’s the major advantage of the neutron bomb, of course; it kills the people but limits damage to buildings. Bioweapons essentially make atomic weapons obsolescent. 

Second, bioweapons can be structured to attack only certain racial groups. That’s potentially either a big advantage or disadvantage to China. The diverse population of the US could also be either an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on who strikes first. But, on the bright side, you can perhaps immunize your own population, or at least the military and “essential” workers, to control the damage. 

Third, bioweapons are very cheap and easy to fabricate. Anyone with access to a good high school chemistry lab is in business. There’s no need for expensive and tricky U-235 or, for that matter, any of the junk toys the Pentagon spends hundreds of billions on. 

Fourth, bioweapons don’t need sophisticated delivery systems; again, no need for B-2s, B-52s, cruise missiles, ICBMs, or any of that. A sick tourist or two, or a few packages sent in the mail, can get the job done. 

Fifth, bioweapons, whether they’re viruses or bacteria, not only offer plausible deniability but the potential to blame a third party. You can launch an attack, and nobody can really be sure who did it. Or even that an attack is, in fact, being launched. 

There’s every advantage to biological warfare from an aggressor’s point of view. And, the aggressor doesn’t even have to be a nation-state, which is, of course, another excuse for governments to further clamp down on their populations, as COVID has shown. Guns are good self-defense weapons, and governments are trying to eliminate them; basement biowar labs are strictly offensive. Imagine the bureaucratic enforcement possibilities.

Quite interestingly and concerning, soon after that Doug Casey story hit the internet, actually reporting within it about Deagel’s lengthy ‘disclaimer’ we featured above, all of that was removed from their website. Why? In the first video below, which was created prior to Deagel deleting their 2025 warning, we hear why they’ve been forecasting massive depopulation for the Western world ahead.

And in the 2nd/final video below, we hear that President Putin has just warned countries in the West not to cross what he called a “red line” with Russia, stating that it would trigger an “asymmetrical, rapid and harsh” response.

Patrick Byrne – We’re Facing a Communist Coup d’Etat


Fascism was always from the Left.  “The principles of our Constitution favor the Individual over the Collective. This Collective stuff comes from the Left. Benito Mussolini was the famous Socialist and the Editor of the Socialist magazine of Italy. That’s what’s coming for us. We’re facing a Socialist coup. A Socialist-Fascist coup.”

View the video here.

Makow – I don’t think Patrick Byrne has the big picture. This is the big picture.  Cabalist Judaism is a Satanic cult. Communism is Cabalist Judaism. The Rothschilds are Cabalist Jews. They control our society through Freemasonry. Almost everyone in a position of power, including Trump, is a Freemason. They intend to enslave and dispossess us. Byrne is behind the curve. Trump is false opposition. What makes Byrne think future elections won’t also be rigged? He warns against violent resistance but how long until the Communists stage false flags and blame them on “white nationalists” etc. ? We need to face the fact that our government, media, corporations, education are all controlled  by Satanists using their control of money (credit.) They have all declared war on society. We are at war. 

SourceAt the Tulsa Conference, Patrick Byrne explained how the election was stolen on November 3rd and who the main party was behind it. “In the United States, there are 3,006 counties…To steal 3,006 counties, you don’t really have to cheat in 3,006 counties, you just need to cheat in six…because, if you cheat deeply in those six counties, out of 3,006…you flip the states that they’re in; and since all six of those states are swing states, you hence flip the Electoral College and there, you hence flip the National Election. So again, to flip 3,006 counties, you don’t cheat in 3,006, you cheat in six…
“And on November 3rd, that evening…they just stopped counting for three hours in six places – and those six places were Las Vegas, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly and Atlanta. If only there were a pattern? So to me, it leaps off the page and it’s so funny hearing people saying, ‘Where’s the evidence?’ Well, the evidence is right there.

“The Socialists are behind it. And I don’t want to scare you, but I want to tell you who’s really behind it. For 15 years, in Chinese national security literature, there’s been a reference to a coming ‘Assassin’s Mace’ for the United States. There’s an expression in Chinese, 杀手锏 (Shāshǒujiàn).

“Shāshǒujiàn means the ‘Assassin’s Mace’ and it’s a reference to 2,500 years ago, one kingdom was going to fight another kingdom and instead of fighting, one king got an assassin into the other king’s bedroom and hits him with a club – a mace – and kills him and the one kingdom takes over the other without a fight. And the greatest way to fight is to win a fight without actually firing a shot or an arrow, in the Chinese mentality.

“So for 15 years, there’s been discussion in their national security literature about a coming Shāshǒujiàn for the United States and our side has been wondering, ‘What is this? Is this their new aircraft carrier? Is this the new hypersonic missile? Is it a new ballistic anti-ship missile? What is it?’

“I think we’re living through the Assassin’s Mace. Basically, it means a one-stroke, sucker punch knockout. And I think we’re living through it. I think this is a Chinese PSYOP.
“And the other piece of bad news is our enemies have information dominance. They have information dominance so they can spin reality to this ridiculous point, it’s hard to even comprehend. Well, they have so many Americans confused in so many ways.

“So that’s the bad news. The good news is, as I mentioned yesterday, we have 51-64% of American adults – and probably closer to 64% believe that the election of Joe Biden happened because of fraud that was significant or very significant. And that’s what they’ll tell a pollster, so how many people who really think it is higher than that.”

Byrne then gives a brief history of the Republican Party and how it was originally formed by four men in a tavern in New Hampshire in 1854 led by Amos Tuck with the sole purpose to eliminate slavery, contrary to the lies and spin of the Democrats, who were pro-slavery, pro-segregation and who are today the despicable race-hustling traitors, acting on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party to collapse America.

He says, “The Republican Party as it stands; the leadership of the actual party infrastructure is corrupt, it’s terrible. Through the Fall, I got an exposure to all of those people I ever want to see in my life. They have nothing to do with you. They detest Donald Trump. 40% of the problem Trump faced was them. And I saw it!…As I described it in my book, I told the folks in the room; it’s the most surreal conversation I’ve ever seen; to see these goofball lawyers yelling at the President. It was astonishing.”

Byrne becomes serious. “We have a couple years, at most to come out of this OK or we are the victims of a complete Socialist coup. There’s no way to start a new party to stop it. We have to take over the Republican Party from the inside.

He urges audience members to get involved in Sidney Powell’s DefendTheRepublic, and/or his American Project (text “USA” to 84576 to join) or get on Mike Lindell’s new Frank social media site. He says, “I think we have a 60-70% [chance] of making it intact, 19 months to the 2022 Election.

“They’re talking about admitting new states now and of course, they’re going to stack the Supreme Court; they’re doing all these things to completely change the United States. We may make it to 2022.

“If that happens, we have to be prepared by getting involved in your election process. Election integrity – and that means not just the 4 hours of training that lets you be an observer, it’s the two days of training that lets you work in a precinct – and especially in any Swing State.

“But this is going on, not just in Swing States. We think they stole four Congressional seats in Virginia, two in Nevada, half a dozen in Texas. This is going on all over the country.

“You’re also going to learn one day, I don’t want to get too far ahead but you’re really gonna learn some day, this has been going on since 2004 at a modest level. They went for broke this time but they’ve been doing this for some time…

“I think the truth of January 6th has yet to be seen. But I will tell you something, The plan was, we had presented, the day before, to a number of senators and their staffs, everything they needed, exactly the right questions they needed to ask to challenge the votes in different states, of the Electoral votes that were being submitted. And that was what was going to happen on that Wednesday afternoon; the senators were going to stand up and challenge these votes and we had given them all the intellectual ammunition they needed to do it.

“That break-in to the Capitol, which may have actually happened before Trump finished his speech…and which may have suffered from some agents provocateurs infiltrating the class – all that said, they won. They won that…We can’t afford to make that mistake again. I hope everybody listening on the internet or television, whatever understands that. We lost because that happened.

“I think we would have won. It would have been nice if we’d had a little help from Pence but we had a dozen senators ready to stand up and prepared to stand up and challenge what needed to be challenged and we lost that opportunity because our side ended up in the Capitol. Who knows how that really happened. Maybe we were sold out by traitors but we didn’t do the right thing. The right thing would have been to grab ’em and hold them in the grass and keep the thing peaceful…”

Byrne is adamant that we remain non-violent and that we nip the bud any violence of agents provocateurs trying to instigate violence, as violence is what the Biden administration wants more than anything.

“They have the DHS, they have the FBI…they want it to turn violent, because…they get to throw you in FEMA camps, they get to round you up – all kinds of things. They want it to be violent.

“You’re going to be asked sooner than you think to go back to a world where you are expressing your political beliefs without fear – and just remember the lesson of January 6th…

He reminds us, “We are fighting for you, you’re not alone. If you read my book, you’ll hear about names of people with funny names, like a guy we call ‘Weaponized Autism’, hackers and stuff. Just know we are all together. Yeah, we lost that one, we are all together. We are working for you, you’re not alone. We’re at the, please check it out.”
—-Related – Byrne – How Trump Lost the White House