Throughout the years, I have been asked a lot of questions from women about sex in marriage. The questions about oral and anal sex are the ones most commonly asked. I love what Got Questions has to say about both of these:

Is oral sex a sin if done within a marriage?

“Many, perhaps most, Christian married couples have had this question. What makes it difficult is the fact that the Bible nowhere says what is allowed or disallowed sexually between a husband and wife, other than, of course, any sexual activity that involves another person (swapping, threesomes, etc.) or that involves lusting after another person (pornography). Outside of these two restrictions, the principle of ‘mutual consent’ would seem to apply (1 Corinthians 7:5). While this text specifically deals with abstaining from sex/frequency of sex, ‘mutual consent’ is a good concept to apply universally in regards to sex within marriage. Whatever is done, it should be fully agreed on between the husband and his wife. Neither spouse should be forced or coerced into doing something he/she is not completely comfortable with. If oral sex is done within the confines of marriage and in the spirit of mutual consent, there is not a biblical case for declaring it to be a sin.”

Concerning anal sex, this is what they wrote:

“Anal sex between a husband and wife, within the confines of marriage, in the spirit of mutual consent, cannot be definitively categorized as a sin.

“Please note – while anal sex between a husband and his wife might not be sinful, that does not mean we endorse it. In fact, it is our conviction that anal sex is wrong, even within the confines of marriage. Medically speaking, anal sex is neither healthy nor safe. Anal sex increases the risk of tissue damage, infection, and the transmission of STDs.”

I feel badly for young women today since most men have watched porn. When I was young and married, these things were never spoken about. Oral sex became popular after Clinton had oral sex in the Oval Office and stated that it wasn’t sex. Then oral sex exploded. I’m not saying it’s sinful, but some wives have told me that this is all their husband wants. Anal sex has become popular in the past years, sadly, too. I’m sure it’s due to porn usage.

Personally, I believe that there should be mutual consent in the bedroom between a husband and a wife, as Got Questions wrote. However, a wife should want to please her husband in the bedroom and not defraud him, but if there are things that she feels entirely uncomfortable doing, she should not have to do it.

 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
1 Corinthians 7:3-5

***Here’s a GREAT sermon by John MacArthur on the rape of Song of Solomon. “Mark Driscoll has boldly led the parade down this carnal path. He is by far the best-known and most prolific popular proponent of handling the Song of Solomon that way. He has said repeatedly that this is his favorite passage of Scripture, and he has come back to it again and again in recent years, culminating in a highly publicized series released on video via the Internet last year.”

Here’s part two in this sermon series.

Part three. “That’s a particular problem when the interpreter sees a mandate for oral sex in the simple metaphor of a fruit tree or imagines that the best way to contextualize and illustrate portions of the text is by verbally undressing his own wife in order to make the point as vivid as possible. In such a case, not only has the speaker given far too much weight to his own speculative imagination; he has given a fairly clear signal that his imagination is not altogether pure (Luke 6:45).

“And that is a far more serious problem than merely allegorizing the text.”

Part four. “I have a real problem with anyone interpreting Song of Solomon like that. . . . To be honest, words fail me when I even try to explain myself—when I try to explain how I just cannot even conceive of Song of Solomon like that. The poetic nature of the Song is entirely eroded when we assign such meaning to it: such specific meaning. And I think as well of what it may do to a couple to be able to say “Look, this specific sex act is mandated in Scripture. So let’s do it.” That may be said to a spouse who has no desire to do that act or who even finds it distasteful. And yet with our interpretation of Song of Solomon, which we really have no way of proving (at least beyond a reasonable doubt) we are potentially bludgeoning an unwilling partner into doing something. I just . . . again, words really fail me here.

Mutual Consent in the Bedroom

Nearly arrested in Nashville, Tennessee library for refusing to cooperate with mask law hoax.

Yesterday evening, March 31st, inspired by Henry’s latest article on Civil Disobedience, I went to the downtown Nashville library, which is in the process of being gutted by Social Justice, Cultural Marxist activists. What evidence did I have for this?  They had BLM books and posters all over the entrance lobby.

I promptly took pictures, and went to explore the library.

The librarian, who was in the massive foyer, apparently did not have the courage to tell me to put a mask on.  So, he tattled to a police officer upstairs, who began descending the steps as I began ascending them.  

He told me to put a mask on, and I told him masks were a hoax, that 99.7% of those under 70 recovered from the virus, and that the CDC and WHO, both who were not accountable to American taxpayers at all, but rather, are both controlled by the big corporations making record profits off this lockdown, CHANGED THE DEFINITION OF A PANDEMIC IN 2009 from deaths to infections.  This means, the pre-2009 definition, if still in force, would mean no mandated masks and no mandatory lockdowns.  This proves, to anyone with common sense, that this entire lockdown is a gigantic hoax. 

He then called two more police officers.  I told him I support the police, however, not when police follow bogus laws intended to harm the citizenry.  Finally, noting there was only 30 minutes left until the library closed, I consented to put a mask on.  However, I then toured the entire three floors of the library, and apparently all three floors had been alerted, because they gave knowing smiles when I approached.

On the top floor, a gentleman with hair dyed pink, when asked what he thought of the mask mandate, said he didn’t want to talk about it.  “Well”, said I, “you’re following nonsensical rules you cannot discuss or understand, which is really pathetic”.

Then, I wondered if the library had been cleaning out their children’s section like other libraries have been doing around America.  I wanted to check if they had the Wizard of Oz series, that I enjoyed as a child.  By the way, I’ve been in dozens of libraries in America, in the past year, and THEY ALL HAVE THE SAME CULTURAL MARXIST MESSAGING.  This is not coming from the community, it’s elites who control the American library association (ALA) are forcing their propaganda down America’s throats funding it with our tax dollars.  

As I get to the children’s section, I notice the police officer there, and he’s on the phone, ending a conversation with someone.  “Yes, I understand, I’ll talk to him”, he says. I immediately deduced the clerk on the upper floor had tattled to the police, after getting chewed out.  The library was full of effeminate tattletale librarians, who use the police as their personal bodyguards to defend their ridiculous, arbitrary, and tyrannical rules.  

So, then, three police officers told me I had to leave the children’s section because I had no kids. A five minute video is included, I wish I had better technology.

The audacity.  There is absolutely no law that says you have to have kids to visit the kids section of the library.  Then, when I told him if he could show me the rule, I would leave, a female librarian, brainwashed in college no doubt, as all librarians must have college degrees, shows me the rule, WHICH SPECIFICALLY SAYS THAT ADULTS AND TEENS MAY BROWSE THE CHILDREN’S SECTION.  So, they were saying I was breaking a rule that their own rules showed clearly they were wrong about.  So, I refused to leave, and continued refusing to leave, until, finally, I asked for the police officers supervisors name and number,  informing him that if he was so concerned about his job, when the public finds out he’s threatening to arrest people for going to the children’s section of the library, he’s really going to have something to worry about.  The public pays for the library and police to ensure the ACCESS OF ALL OF THE PUBLIC TO ALL PARTS OF THE LIBRARY.  

Finally ended, and walked out.  The officer told me I would be arrested if I entered the library for a year, and I told him I’d be speaking with his supervisor and he’d be lucky to have a job tomorrow.  

Will be contacting his supervisor today.  Then, I began touring the state Capitol building, which is quite a sight.  I saw the two presidents from Tennessee, both Andrews, Andrew Jackson, and Andrew Johnson.  They both had statues, and it is interesting to remember that Andrew Jackson fought off Nicholas Biddle, the Rothschilds, and their bank, nearly getting assassinated for his efforts.  

Those same devilish bankers are behind the chaos we are dealing with today.  

I saw a statue of Sam Davis, who was a Confederate soldier spy, found behind Union Lines with information on Union troop positions, and who, rather than inform on his own side, chose to die, when faced with the death penalty, saying, when offered leniency, “ “I WOULD DIE A THOUSAND DEATHS BEFORE I WOULD BETRAY A FRIEND.”  Don’t believe in the Confederate cause, but this was a brave action.Further along was a massive monument to all the volunteers of Tennessee who gave their lives from World War 1 on.  Very sad to reflect that thy died for the bankers wealth and power, not for their families or America, as they had been deceived into think g by the lying media, which is still lying and deceiving to this day.  
As I turned a corner, I saw an attractive woman speaking at the Capitol, with a cameraman videoing her.  I approached to hear what she was saying, and heard her uttering the latest coronavirus propaganda.  Indignant, I passed behind her, to ensure that the camera saw me too, and then exploded, “Why are you lying to the American people?  99.7% of those who get coronavirus under 70 recover, this shutdown is a gigantic hoax.”  The cameraman began gesticulating, annoyed, to silence me. This only motivated my efforts.  The woman stood quietly to the side with a bemused smile on her face, and I denounced both of them, telling them they ought to be ashamed of themselves for lying to America,  That God hates liars, and he surely must hate both of them.  They folded up the camera and left.
After that, I toured for about three hours more, then walked three miles home, over the beautiful Cumberland River.  

As I passed over the river, on the downtown side, I saw the social justice warriors had been busy setting up markers to inspire racial hatred. Also, downtown Nashville still has businesses that are badly damaged and not open due to the George Floyd riots of May of last year. This plaque was installed in 2019, and its some anonymous race victim group that thinks reminding everyone of past racial wrongs is beneficial. All it is is an attempt to stir up hate whitey animosity.

Environmentalism is Euphemism for Genocide


Genocidalists Julian Huxley, Princes Philip & Bernhard
Huxley would be taking his life into his hands if he openly called for eugenics, so he called the movement instead environmentalism.
Genocide is a Keystone of Globalism
COVID VACCINES ARE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION & COULD WIPE OUT THE HUMAN RACE (DR VERNON COLEMAN)Former Pfizer VP says experimental Covid-19 vaccines could be “used for massive-scale depopulation”   I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil.”
Unless we put a stop to the plans of Prince Charles and his friends, the physical economy will be torn asunder, and a genocide, perhaps several times greater than Hitler’s, will ensue….The Green New Deal is a carefully crafted vehicle for radical population reduction, with almost no real concern about the environment. 


The Global Reset: The Great Leap Backward 
This article appears in the March 26, 2021 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

by Richard Freeman(abridged by
Britain’s Prince Charles, BlackRock investment advisors,and the financiers of the City of London and Wall Street, are implementing, at great speed, a green genocide program called the Great Reset, or the Green New Deal. 
Under the clothing of environmentalism, it would implement radical population reduction; a shutdown of agricultural-manufacturing production; and the building of a $40 trillion green speculative bubble, all implemented through a central bankers’ dictatorship.
On cue, the witless President Joe Biden issued two very important executive orders–EO13990 and EO14008–within the first week of taking office, and other programs were brought up, such as the policy paper, “Making Mission Possible,” to realize the Green New Deal.
This is being activated at a furious pace that few people actually see.
Unless we put a stop to the plans of Prince Charles and his friends, the physical economy will be torn asunder, and a genocide, perhaps several times greater than Hitler’s, will ensue.

The way to understand the Green New Deal is to understand its history, and its intent. It did not arise out of the thin blue sky. 
The Green New Deal was not assembled in 2017, as the media often dishonestly and profusely report. Rather it is the culmination of a 75-year project. The Green New Deal is a carefully crafted vehicle for radical population reduction, with almost no real concern about the environment. 
The genocidalists who assembled the Green New Deal, and its offshoots, believe that only the super-wealthy, the upper three or four percent of the population, are fit to live; they regard the other part of the population, the 96 percent, as, in the words of the Nazis, “people whose lives are not worthy to live.”
In 1946, Julian Huxley, called for the revival of the Nazi policy of eugenics, only one year after World War II had ended. In the same year of 1946, Huxley had created and appointed himself director of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). In the statement stating UNESCO’s purpose, Huxley wrote:
The dead weight of genetic stupidity, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved. Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest possible care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.
In 1946, the issue of eugenics was highly charged. Even though Huxley put it into UNESCO’s policy statement, he would be taking his life into his hands if he called for eugenics as a movement openly, so he called the movement instead environmentalism.
As for Prince Philip, in the foreword to a 1987 book [by Fleur Cowles] called, If I Were an Animal, he wrote in response to human population growth, “I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a deadly virus.”
Princes Philip and Bernhard, along with Huxley, created the World Wildlife Fund as an organization command center for what would become the Great Reset. They deployed Philip’s son Charles for this purpose.
Prince Charles’ power derives not from himself, but comes from his location in an institutional arrangement amongst the monarchy; the City of London, Wall Street, and other financial centers; the Bank of England; and MI5, MI6, GCHQ–the intelligence centers. I want to emphasize that there are other forces as well.
In the early 1990s, Philip et al. deployed Charles to help set up and direct the agenda of the Earth Summit, which was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. 
I will only report on two features. The summit was an extravaganza with more than 100 heads of state and 38,000 people in attendance. The first feature is that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change previously had reported on climate change as both natural and man-made. 
At the Rio summit, it only reported henceforth that climate change was man-made. Second, it laid out sharp reductions in greenhouses gases; the reductions were made mandatory at the Kyoto summit five years later in 1997. The Rio Earth summit became the precedent for all future UN environmental summits held every five years….
If Executive Orders 13990 and 14008, now signed by President Biden, are implemented, they will cripple America’s agricultural and industrial capacity and destroy its ability to make breakthroughs to next levels of development.

The situation has intensified as the British attempt to impose the Great Reset/Green New Deal upon a willing Biden administration, making the United States the leading model for this program globally.
Biden and his Special Envoy for Climate, former Secretary of State John Kerry, are working at a frenzied pace. They are adopting policies, by executive orders, that would, by design, significantly undermine America’s agricultural and industrial physical capacity and assets. This would threaten the nation’s human existence.
On January 20, a mere few hours after having been sworn in as President, Biden signed Executive Order 13990. In a simplified explanation, all federal, state, and local levels of government are required by law to evaluate each new potential infrastructure or other project on a cost-benefit analysis basis, in which the benefit is supposed to be greater than the cost. What Biden’s EO13990 does, is it would make mandatory that “social costs of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases” are made part of the cost-benefit analysis…
The good news is that on March 8, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and the Attorneys General from 11 other states, filed suit against Biden’s Executive Order 13990 in the Eastern District of Missouri, saying:
[It will] inflict trillions of dollars of damage to the U.S. economy for decades to come. It will destroy jobs, stifle energy production, strangle America’s energy independence, suppress agriculture, deter innovation, and impoverish working families.
As for Biden’s EO 14008, it is sweeping. It’s going to direct the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to report on the security implications of climate change. So, it’s now shifting climate change into a central policy in every agency, including our Defense Department and the intelligence services.
Executive Order 14008 … will take out of use 30% of federal lands and 30% of federal waters from any form of energy development or use for productive purposes like agriculture.
Lastly, we briefly consider a policy paper called, “Making Mission Possible,” produced by the London-based Energy Transitions Commission. The report appears to set the ground to heavily reduce the production and use of aluminum, cement, and steel, because allegedly their production involves the production of too much greenhouse gases that could lead supposedly to higher levels of global warming…
If you took those three elements out by themselves, you could not build infrastructure, you would not have manufacturing, you would not have agricultural implements.
Kill off significant sections of agriculture, as Biden’s executive orders would do, and the economy is blowing out, and human existence plummets, setting the stage for the 75-year-old project run by Julian Huxley, Prince Charles and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, for the radical reduction of the population. But it is the same condition in most nations of the world with the exception of China, and positive sections of Asia.
The lawsuit filed by the Attorneys General of 12 states indicates we have tremendous openings, if we seize them. We can bring the Green New Deal completely down, and move into the world of the Belt and Road Initiative.