Headlines for Jan 16

offer.png

(Left- This offer was snapped up I assume, as the ad quickly disappeared from Kajiji Winnipeg)—-
What You Need to Know About the COVID Shot, and the Depopulation Agenda

http://www.richardpresser.com/wordpress/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-shot-and-more/

trump-mark.jpeg

British Government Used “Propagandistic” Fear Tactics To Scare Public Into Mass Compliance

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

The British government used “propagandistic” fear tactics to scare the public into mass compliance during the first COVID lockdown, according to a behavioral scientist who worked inside Downing Street.

Simon Ruda co-founded Number 10’s ‘Nudge Unit’, which was initially set up to encourage positive behavioral changes in the British public without the need for coercion or legislation, but was weaponized during the pandemic to create scaremongering.

    “In my mind, the most egregious and far-reaching mistake made in responding to the pandemic has been the level of fear willingly conveyed on the public,” wrote Ruda.

    “That fear seems to have subsequently driven policy decisions in a worrying feed-back loop,” he added, noting that such actions amounted to “state sanctioned propaganda.”

The behavioral scientist said that an obsession with daily case numbers came to dominate thinking, serving to spread even more fear.

That process included grossly exaggerating the threat posed by COVID and producing lurid, alarmist propaganda to frighten the population into subservience.

https://summit.news/2022/01/14/british-government-used-propagandistic-fear-tactics-to-scare-public-into-mass-compliance/——

How Trump’s mentor Roy Cohn helped the Jews hijack the anti-Communist movement

https://fitzinfo.net/2020/07/24/how-trumps-mentor-roy-cohn-helped-the-jews-hijack-the-anti-communist-movement/

Biden’s NeoCon handlers trying to start a war with Russia  – Won’t happen because they run Russia too  (see below)

Sergey Lavrov on Russia/US-NATO Security Talks

https://stephenlendman.org/2022/01/15/sergey-lavrov-on-russia-us-nato-security-talks/#more-36278

‘The days of state-run TV are over’: Nadine Dorries clobbers the BBC with a £2billion funding cut as she freezes the licence fee for two years, with a row over ‘Left-wing bias’ threatening to spill out into all-out war with the Corporation— 

dion98.jpg


What? Communist control is not 100%?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10406491/Nadine-Dorries-hits-BBC-2bn-funding-cut-freezes-annual-licence-fee-charge-2024.html—

“Australia Baby Girl” Dies From Brain Hemorrhage 5 Days After Pfizer Vaccine Shot – GreatGameIndia

https://greatgameindia.com/baby-brain-hemorrhage-vaccine/

Celine Dion singing the “vaccine” blues — Guess she didn’t get the placebo

A post on the Canadian singer’s website says the tour’s remaining North American shows have been cancelled as her recovery from “severe and persistent muscle spasms” takes longer than first hoped.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/article-celine-dion-cancels-remainder-of-courage-world-tour-shows-over-health/


Great example of non compliance seen at Gab video
Stop these fuckers in their tracks 

https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/107627954458329451—

Reader- “This is how it’s done, well done this lady. Remember they rely solely oncompliance of the public.”Customer in an Etobicoke Costco is arrested and hauled away by cops for not wearing a mask despite having a medical exemption.

Allegedly one of the managers of the store is detaining the man alongside police.

It’s for your health.

https://twitter.com/realmonsanto/status/1482374233414160384–
putin-mendal.jpg

Russia is run by Chabad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQmsz3F-y1c&t=3s

Chabad, Russian Revolution, Kabbalah & Jewish Messianism

https://fitzinfo.net/2021/11/30/chabad-russian-revolution-kabbalah-jewish-messianism/amp/
—–

The portly David icke – False Opposition, fails to mention Organized Jewry, Communism and Satanism (He wouldn’t be caught dead reading henrymakow.com)

 Part 1 https://www.bitchute.com/video/yrcqVDrEl1Qc/

Part 2 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Av6W9zlryDBk/

Part 3 https://www.bitchute.com/video/H1Rtbs1oxhlo/
Spencer Fernando- Sabotage: With Vaccine Mandates For Truckers, Trudeau Seems Intent On Deliberately Damaging Canada’s Economy

barnett-gary.jpg

(Left, Pavlov’s dog.)

Gary D Barnett also afraid to use the J-word

https://www.garydbarnett.com/

Will the goyim ever learn?

https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/11/blind-leading-blind.html?_ga=2.212192916.1006389435.1638658226-346964864.1627224119

https://www.henrymakow.com

The American “Right” is Largely False Opposition

elzl4xy1makgamgx.jpg(McCarthy — March 8, 1954 Edition of TIME) 
In 1954, businessman DeWest Hooker discovered
that Jewish central bankers (i.e. Bernard Baruch) funded “anti-Communism” to obscure the fact that Communism (i.e. the covid scam today) is in fact  
Jewish satanist supremacism. Illuminati bankers manipulate public 
perception using false opposition like Donald Trump or Alex Jones. 

If they get mainstream media exposure, they are certified kosher.(E.g. Alex Jones ghosted Henry Makow.) 
We live in a de facto Communist (Masonic Jewish) society.

Mr. Marks stated that a lot of Jews called McCarthy an anti-Semite but little did they know that “he is the best friend the Jews ever had.”

“We were the ones that wrote the speeches for McCarthy  back in West Virginia that started his build-up into the famous  anti-Communist that he is today. Our pressure on the press resulted in his getting as much attention as he has. In return for this build-up, he agreed not to call up or expose Jews in the Communist movement by the investigations through his sub-committee.”

hooker1.jpg
chimage.jpeg

 The Communist Jews Behind Sen. Joseph McCarthy
by Michael Collins Piper 
(from his 2006 book, “The Judas Goats”)
(First posted here Nov. 24, 2010) 

 

What follows is the sworn statement that Hooker executed on September 30, 1954 outlining his findings about the role of the self-styled “American Jewish League Against Communism” and how it was manipulating then Sen.  Joseph R. McCarthy’s efforts to investigate Communism in high places  in the American system. The affidavit reads: 

 “I had an astounding interview for two hours some time ago with Norman  L. Marks of the American Jewish League Against Communism, Inc.  As a matter of fact, I was brought along by another party, and Mr. Marks did not know anything about me (hence he really opened up because the person who took me was “trusted” by him).  The AJLAC has offices at 220 West 42nd Street, New York City. Its  national chairman is Alfred Kohlberg. Its executive director is Rabbi  Benjamin Schultz, and its treasurer is Harry Pasternak. Listed on its  national board are the following: Bern Dibner, Lawrence Fertig,  Theodore Fine, Benjamin Gitlow, Hon. Walter R. Hart, Herman Kashins,  Eugene Lyons, Norman L. Marks, Morris Ryskind, Rabbi David S. Savitz,  Nathan D. Shapiro, George E. Sokolsky, Maurice Tishman, Rabbi Ascher  M. Yager.

[Businessman DeWest Hooker, 1918-1989 left)

I swear under oath to you that the following is as accurate as it is possible to put down from memory an hour or so later. Also, the  information can be verified by the other unnamed party. 

Mr. Marks, listed above and on the letterhead of the AJLAC as a member  of the national board, said: “Far and away the principal financial contributor to the AJLAC is Mr. Bernard Baruch.” When questioned on this point as to what percentage he would say Mr. Baruch contributed, he answered: “About 85% or 90% of the funds.”

 I said that I had thought Mr. Kohlberg was the main contributor to the  AJLAC and Mr. Marks answered: “Well, he contributes some but nothing  like what Baruch contributes.” I asked Mr. Marks why Baruch’s name did not appear on the letterhead. He stated that Baruch was very emphatic about NOT having his name appear on the letterhead, and that it was to be unknown that he contributed funds to it.

 Mr. Marks said that the organization was entirely Jewish but that a funny thing was that many of the founders of it seemed to have  “Christian” wives. He said that they used to meet every Thursday at the Ambassador Hotel for lunch and talk about the world situation.  Marks said that the organization would not accept either a “Christian in it” or a “Christian dime of support” and that no Christian money  had ever been accepted in the past–that it was completely a Jewish  organization and financed by them.

 He said there were only two purposes for its founding: That the Number  One purpose was to take the heat off the Jewishness of Communism, and  a secondary aim was to get the Jews out of Communism and to support  Zionism. He said that: “for a while there, almost all the spies of the  Communists that were turned up were Jews and that they had become  concerned, and thought that something should be done to take the sting  off the Jews. They wanted to show the Christian world that ALL Jews  were not Communists.”

 When asked just how they went about this whole project, Mr. Marks  said: “It’s impossible for a Christian to get away with criticizing  the Jews. Only a Jew can do that.”

 He went on: “And so we got together a strong group of Jews that “were  known to be anti-Communists” and started our campaign of pressure from our point of view.”

 [According to Hooker’s original affidavit, Marks’ reference to those  who were said to be “anti-Communists” actually meant that the Jewish  leaders in question were, as Hooker put it, “meaning  anti-Stalinist.”–Ed.]

Marks stated: “We were the ones that wrote the speeches for McCarthy back in West Virginia that started his build-up into the famous  anti-Communist that he is today. Our pressure on the press resulted in  his getting as much attention as he has. In return for this build-up  he agreed not to call up or expose Jews in the Communist movement by  the investigations through his sub-committee.”

 Mr. Marks stated that a lot of Jews called McCarthy an anti-Semite but little did they know that “he is the best friend the Jews ever had.”

 [Hooker noted of McCarthy that “Eventually they destroyed him anyway when he started calling up Jewish Communists later on.”–Ed.]

 Marks went on to say that “other investigations might have turned up  Jews and McCarthy had been given credit for them, but that if we traced the record back, we would find that McCarthy actually did not call up a single Jew in that period when the heat was on the Jews.” He  later qualified these remarks by saying that “while McCarthy was  operating as a temporary subcommittee under the Truman administration,  he did not call up any Jews; that when he once got himself elected as  the chairman of the permanent investigating committee, in the new  administration, he then began to call witnesses “as they came.”  [That is, whether the witnesses were “Jewish or not,” according to Hooker–Ed.]

LIKE MARTIN LUTHER KING, McCARTHY RUN BY JEWISH BANKERS 

desantis.jpg

Mr, Marks continued: “But that doesn’t make much difference now because he accepted our own men to work right with him. For example,  he accepted as his top man next to him our man Roy Cohn, left, which was  arranged through another of our men, George Sokolsky.”

If memory serves me correctly, Marks stated that Julius Kahn was also  their man on the McCarthy committee, but who was now on the Senate  Foreign Relations Committee. He definitely stated that David Schine  was NOT with the AJLAC but that he was put there by “another group  which I don’t know about.”

 Mr. Marks went on to say that “not only is McCarthy under our control  but so are Jenner and Velde, who also took our men to work right with  them. Benny Mandel and Robert Morris represent us on the Jenner  Committee.” He mentioned Robert Kunzig as “their man” for Velde.  Marks also stated definitely that Professor Louis Budenzwas under  “their control” and one of “their men,” and that he was working to  take the “heat” off the Jews.

 [Budenz was a well-known “ex-communist” who became a leading figure in  the so-called anti-communist movement, key elements of which had come  under the control of the Zionist and Trotskyite elements. Hooker’s  revelations explain why–Ed.]

 (left, Florida Gov Ron De Santis at the Western Wall in Jerusalem)

He stated that [Alfred] Kohlberg, their national chairman, was the one  who “found” Budenz when he was testifying in Washington and Kohlberg  “picked him up and practically supported him for a while in order to  get him started and built up to the man he is today in the  anti-Communist movement.”

 Marks also stated that they got “their man Robert Morris” elected  recently as a judge in New York City, and that Victor Lasky was  another one of their men who did a lot of “press work” for them, and  “made speeches favoring their people, for example, Robert Morris.” He  said, “All these people agreed to take the ‘heat’ off the Jews.”

 I recall now another statement by Mr. Marks that “there is a vast pooling of information in the New York City area and throughout the  country which is connected with our organization.”

 I asked if J. B. Matthews and his files were in on “the deal” and he  said: “Yes, we have access to all of his files.”

 [J. B. Matthews was a prominent “anti-communist crusader” in the  period, but, clearly, under the control of the Zionist-Trotskyites.–Ed.] 

He said that they have at least “thirty Communists on our payroll who report information to us,” and that “we know everything that goes on  in this field.”

 Mr, Marks told all the above information as if there was nothing  “wrong” with what he was saying. He even invited me and this other unnamed fellow to go to a meeting the following Tuesday night at the  University Club, sponsored by Norman Lombard.

 When they finally found out who I was, however, I was told by Norman Lombard and Norman Marks not to come to the meeting. I sure hope that the true patriotic American nationalists will be able to straighten out a few of these “pseudo-patriots” who are trying to lead the  so-called “anti-communist” movement.

 Don’t misunderstand me: I’m just as anti-Communist as any of you, but I don’t want our country to be led head-long into traps which enable  these pseudo-patriots to “use” the fine instincts of the American  people and the anti-Communist movement for their own diabolical ends.  In other words, some of these pseudo-patriots are “anti-Communist,”  meaning “anti-Stalin communism,” but are pro- as hell another form of  Communism (American brand) leading to dictatorship by them in our own  country and the rest of the world under Bernard Baruch and the crowd  he represents.

 [The “American brand” of communism to which Hooker referred, although  he didn’t say it directly, was precisely the Trotskyite brand, then in  its evolution, that has come today to be known as “neo-conservatism.”  –Ed.] 

(Signed) DeWest Hooker

(—Makow comment: Reading this, it’s hard to imagine that the same forces didn’t put Hitler into power. Or that The John Birch Society and some anti-NWO websites are truly independent.)

After World War Two ended, the Illuminati needed to create the bogus Cold War to justify the arms race and the national security state (just as the “war on terror” replaces the Cold War today.) The problem was that Communism could be traced back to the Illuminati Jewish bankers. Most Communist spies were Jewish and Soviet Communism was Illuminati Jewish. They used McCarthy to fuel Cold War hysteria while de-emphasizing the role Jews play as agent/dupes for the Illuminati bankers. Apparently McCarthy outlived his usefulness and they murdered him at Bethesda Naval Medical Center after disgracing him earlier.    

This article impugns Organized Jewry but most Jews are manipulated by these machinations, just like non Jews. It’s pathetic that anti-Communist/ anti-NWO forces need to be organized and subsidized by the enemy. It proves my contention that grass roots or populist resistance is negligible and nothing gets done politically unless someone pays for it. And you know who can afford that.


Thanks to Tony Blizzard for sending me this excerpt.

Related-How Trump’s mentor Roy Cohn helped the Jews hijack the anti-Communist movement
Piper Collins- The Judas Goat/The Enemy Within
The Strange Death of Michael Collins Piper
Kevin MacDonald reviews a book on McCarthy & the Jews

First Comment from Dan Butler 1955-2018:I recall that the former staff director of the Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-exempt Foundations. Mr. Norman Dodd said to John Birch Society’s Edward Griffen in 1984. [See the full transcript here. [1]
This part of Dodd’s testimony didn’t seem very important to me until reading your article today. Dodd said that none other than the chairman of the Republican National Committee and White House use accusations of anti-semitism to shut down the investigation. This ‘back room’ aspect was unreported in the press.
NORMAN DODD: The Republican National Committee got wind of what I was doing and they did everything they could to stop me. They appealed to counsel to stop me, and finally they resorted to the White House.

ED GRIFFIN: Was their objection because of what you were doing or because of the fact that you were doing it outside of the official auspices of the Committee?
NORMAN DODD: No, their objection was, as they put it, my devotion to what they called anti-semitism. That was a cooked up idea. In other words, it wasn’t true at all, but anyway, that’s the way they expressed it.
ED GRIFFIN: The charge of anti-semitism is intriguing. What was the basis of that charge? Was there a basis for it at all?
NORMAN DODD: The basis of what the Republican National Committee used was that the intelligence officer I’d taken on my staff when I oriented this investigation to the exposure and proof of a conspiracy was known to have a book, and the book was deemed to be anti-semitic. This was childish, but this was the second in command of the Republican National Committee, and he told me I’d have to dismiss this person from my staff.
ED GRIFFIN: And what was his book? Do you recall?
NORMAN DODD: The book they referred to was called Waters Flowing Eastward, which was a castigation of the Jewish influence in the world.
[1] If this is the first you’ve heard of Norman Dodd’s testimony please download and study. Crucial hidden history. Tax Exempt Foundations and Collectivist Treason INTERNET ARCHIVE video
Transcript of the video http://www.realityzone.com/hiddenagenda2.html
The original 1953-54 Dodd Report: Committee to Investigate Tax-exempt Foundations
Recommended: FOUNDATIONS: Their Power and Influence. ISBN 0-925951-28-9download PDF format

Tony writes:
I was in this war before John Birch was created. When it came into being with lots of media fanfare it began gobbling up most of the small, true anti-communist, organizations. It struck me as way too dictatorial to its members. I quickly tabbed it as an enemy having three major undesirable aspects:
1. It’s members were “forever learning and never coming to the truth.” Millions of details (lots of trees) but never even mentioning true causes, the forest.
2. It was the first in my knowledge (along with major insurance corporations) to equate capitalism and free enterprise as synonyms when, in reality, they are 180 degrees opposite. Capitalism, which it praised, is simply the concentration of capital into the hands of the few (mainly for their own profit) while free enterprise is capital diversified as much as possible with local businesses taking care of local business. Under free enterprise franchises, malls, and chains, which drain local capital to national or international headquarters, hardly exist. Capital mostly stays in the local community, constantly re-circulated by local business.
3. The Birch society destroyed any local “chapter” which decided on its own to “study the Jewish question.” I saw that take place with my own eyes in So. California at least twice. A dead giveaway of the true reason for its existence.

https://www.henrymakow.com

Who kills the police?

By Abraham H. Miller

Put “race of people shooting police” into Google and you will get page after page of the opposite results: the race or ethnicity of people shot by police.

This is obviously no accident.  The media narrative is that police shoot people, mostly minorities, without justification.

The question of who shoots the police is one that the larger society is generally afraid to ask.  To ask that question might shed a different light on whom the police shoot because it would put the question into a larger context about criminality.

For the “defund the police” crowd and the progressive minions of distributive and restorative justice, it would undermine an empowering narrative that has enabled them to shackle the police while letting criminals run free without bail and being rewarded with pleas to lower offenses.null

For as long as the police and the “system” can be viewed as victimizing minorities, these minorities can be viewed as victims and not criminals.

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.495.1_en.html#goog_729802022

The data on who kills police are tracked by the FBI in its Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted program (LEOK).  Year-to-year aggregations appear difficult to obtain, and the data I found are from 1980 to 2013, as compiled from LEOK by the Washington Post.

During this period, there were 2,269 officers killed in what is described as felonious incidents, which are deaths in the line of duty occurring from criminal acts.  There were 2,896 offenders.  Of the people who killed police, 52% were white, and 41% were black.null

The Post article concluded from this that whites were more likely to kill police than are blacks.  This observation, regrettably, shows either a commitment to a phony narrative or why journalist students have a difficult time getting through a basic course in statistics.

Consider that whites were approximately 70% of the population during this period, while blacks were approximately 12%.  White people were 18% less likely to kill a police officer than their distribution in the population, while black people were 29% more likely to kill a police officer than their distribution in the population.  Put another way, black people were almost 2.5 times more likely to kill a police officer than would be expected from their distribution in the population.

Police officers are not ignorant of who kills them.  Police funerals are attended by officers from departments across state lines, and police are well acquainted with officers being memorialized.null

Mgid
Mgid

recommended byKETOA Teaspoon On An Empty Stomach Burns 12 Lbs Of Fat A Week Safely!LEARN MORE

Moreover, it is not white supremacists calling for killing cops.  “Off the pigs” goes back to the Black Panther days of the 1960s.  In 2015, protesters in St. Paul, Minnesota were holding a Black Lives Matter banner and chanting, “Pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon.”  You did not need a degree in criminal justice to understand what they meant, albeit the obvious meaning was subsequently denied by BLM spokespersons and major media outlets.

In the wake of Minneapolis police officer Kim Porter shooting Daunte Wright, one protester carried a pig’s head on a spike.  None of his fellow protesters found this obscene. 

If that message wasn’t clear, the firebombing of a police union hall in Portland and the rioters in Washington, D.C. chanting “burn the precinct to the ground” should have clarified it.null

We are taught not to think in terms of collective guilt when it comes to identity groups, but when it comes to the police, the tragic behavior of some police is interpreted as representing all police.

Like lynchings in the Jim Crow South, if one police officer is at fault, then all are not only equally culpable but also legitimate targets of revenge.  How else does one explain the assassinations of police sitting in patrol cars hundreds of miles from the scene of any protest?

So if you’re a cop and you encounter a black person, your radar is going to start buzzing in a way that it won’t if you encounter a white person.

According to Office of Juvenile Justice (OJJDP for 2019) statistics for all ages, blacks are responsible for 37% of all violent crimes, 60% of all murders, 53% of all burglaries, and 42% of all illegal weapons possessions, even though they are about 12% of the population.null

Contrast that with Asians, who are six percent of the population and 1.6 percent of the crime rate.  Moreover, Asians have a 5% higher poverty rate than blacks.

Obviously, the causes of criminal behavior are complex, controversial, and highly dependent on environmental and opportunistic factors.  In addition, criminal justice statistics are based on arrests, and arrests can be subject to discretion and reflection of police bias.

But cops on the street are not there to deal with root causes.  Their perceptions of any situation are based not only on individual experience but also on the shared experiences of other officers.  Consequently, cops, like the rest of us, make judgments honed from experience and perceptions of how society works.

To expect anything else is to expect police not to be human beings.  Bromides about professionalism and training pale in comparison to gut instincts about survival.

If you stop someone whose demographic characteristics suggest a disproportionate involvement in criminal activities and illegal weapons possession, as well as a likelihood of killing you, your mindset is going to be influenced by that perception.null

In a world where we have been made increasingly sensitive to identity and identity issues, how could it be otherwise?  After all, in university sensitivity sessions, if we see each other for our common humanity instead of our racial differences, we are racists by absurd definition.

The conflict between minority communities and the police is untenable and unacceptable.  Police need to be made aware of policing bias, and minority communities need to be made aware that vilifying the police, resisting arrest, and killing officers will enhance the likelihood of tragedies on both sides.

Abraham H. Miller is an emeritus professor of political science, University of Cincinnati, and a distinguished fellow with the Haym Solomon Center.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/01/who_kills_the_police.html

British Government Used ‘Propagandistic’ Fear Tactics To Scare Public Into Mass Compliance

The British government used “propagandistic” fear tactics to scare the public into mass compliance during the first COVID lockdown, according to a behavioral scientist who worked inside Downing Street.

british government used 'propagandistic' fear tactics to scare public into mass compliance

SOPA Images via Getty Images

Simon Ruda co-founded Number 10’s ‘Nudge Unit’, which was initially set up to encourage positive behavioral changes in the British public without the need for coercion or legislation, but was weaponized during the pandemic to create scaremongering.

“In my mind, the most egregious and far-reaching mistake made in responding to the pandemic has been the level of fear willingly conveyed on the public,” wrote Ruda.

“That fear seems to have subsequently driven policy decisions in a worrying feed-back loop,” he added, noting that such actions amounted to “state sanctioned propaganda.”https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

The behavioral scientist said that an obsession with daily case numbers came to dominate thinking, serving to spread even more fear.

That process included grossly exaggerating the threat posed by COVID and producing lurid, alarmist propaganda to frighten the population into subservience.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1481620817217736714&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2022%2F01%2Fbritish-government-used-propaganda-fear-tactics.html&sessionId=b8842b62b24704a7724f2ad8e0bd65a4a2c5e239&theme=light&widgetsVersion=f001879%3A1634581029404&width=550px

Leaked: ‘Mass Formation Psychosis’ Admittedly Used by Governments as Tool of Population Control.

Professor of Clinical Psychiatry Who Studied the Psychology of Totalitarianism: ‘This Is How We Win’.

As we previously highlighted, scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government admitted using what they now concede to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behavior during the pandemic.

The London Telegraph reported the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.

The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.”

One scientist with the SPI-B admits that:

“In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-1&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1393305877986283524&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2022%2F01%2Fbritish-government-used-propaganda-fear-tactics.html&sessionId=b8842b62b24704a7724f2ad8e0bd65a4a2c5e239&theme=light&widgetsVersion=f001879%3A1634581029404&width=550px

The unnamed scientist added that, “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

The scientist further confessed that, “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

The fearmongering campaign clearly worked.

By the summer of 2020, the average Brit thought 6-7% of the population of the UK had died from coronavirus, a figure equating to around 4.5 million people.

At the time, COVID-19 had actually claimed around 40,000 lives.

But don’t worry, all this is of no importance whatsoever, because ‘fact checkers’ have ruled that ‘mass formation psychosis’ isn’t a thing that happened at all during the pandemic.

Source: Summit.news

https://humansarefree.com/2022/01/british-government-used-propaganda-fear-tactics.html

Why The Elites Are Obsessed With The End Of The World

In 1999, a young PhD candidate in philosophy named Nick Bostrom published an article in Mind entitled “The Doomsday Argument is Alive and Kicking.” The article asked whether probabilistic attempts to predict when the last human being would be born were reasonable. (They were, it argued.) The title, however, signaled something far more significant: the end of post–Cold War optimism. Human extinction was back on the menu.

why the elites are obsessed with the end of the world

In the years following the Mind article, Bostrom’s star would rise. He was instrumental in founding at Oxford the academic think tank Future of Humanity Institute, devoted to preventing human extinction. Seven years later, his work would help inspire the founding at Cambridge of a second such institute, the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. By 2015, Bostrom had made Foreign Policy’s “Top 100 Global Thinkers” list for the second time.

Largely thanks to Bostrom and a battery of his associates, the study of “existential risks” — threats that could bring about human extinction or permanent civilizational collapse — has become an interdisciplinary academic cottage industry.

With acolytes ranging from the prominent astrophysicist and Astronomer Royal Martin Rees to the neuroscientist Anders Sandberg, the “x-risk” crowd has now spent the past two decades meticulously inventorying threats to our species, particularly those posed by artificial intelligence and emergent technologies.https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

X-risk preoccupations extend far beyond the ivory tower. Jaan Tallinn, formerly of Skype, co-founded both the CSER and the Future of Life Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and has donated generously to the FHI and the Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative.

The mercurial Elon Musk sits on the advisory board of both the CSER and the FLI and has bequeathed millions to each. The Open Philanthropy Project, a charitable organization run by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, has pledged to donate over $15 million to the FHI.

It is no exaggeration to say that billionaires are quietly bankrolling existential risk research.

Over the past summer, this behind-the-scenes activity played out in flamboyant fashion with a pair of private space launches spearheaded by Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos. Like Musk, Bezos in particular has long professed that private space colonization is necessary to safeguard humanity.

In an article for The Guardian published in July, the Oxford historian Thomas Moynihan’s response was to lampoon Silicon Valley’s obsession, arguing that aspiring “space barons” like Musk and Jeff Bezos are abdicating responsibility for sublunar crises here on Earth.

His book, X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction, more meticulously locates this obsession within a longer history. Like much of his other public writing, it traces how our species “discovered its own extinction.”

Paradoxically, however, the book is wildly Panglossian — within a few pages it becomes apparent that he shares the techno-optimism of the very space tycoons he criticizes. Although he is at pains to argue that existential risk “cannot be rejected as a Silicon Valley fad,” he nonetheless traffics in tried-and-true Silicon Valley rhetoric: that we must enthusiastically embrace promising new technologies to realize “the full scope of our potential” as a species. (Moynihan is the Future of Humanity Institute’s informal in-house historian, surely no accident.)

A case in point: he tells us that the “discovery” of human extinction was the ultimate triumph of Enlightenment rationalism. Thanks to a series of intellectual breakthroughs — and growing awareness that the cosmos might be devoid of intelligent life — modern science and Enlightenment philosophy confronted the fact that human survival is not preordained.

We alone can secure our future:

“Remember, the human is a being whose vocation […] is to liberate itself from its own extinction,” he intones.

Yet, while X-Risk represents an exhaustive catalog of reflections on our species’s potential demise — spanning centuries, academic disciplines, and national borders — Moynihan’s history also contains a glaring, dangerous, and obviously intentional omission: the word “eugenics” does not appear once in 424 pages.

This is no mere oversight. His book systematically glosses over the fact that human extinction was a hobbyhorse of the eugenics movement, and it has now reemerged as a fascination of the contemporary existential risk crowd, often rebranded as “bioenhancement,” “transhumanism,” and even “new eugenics.”

Indeed, although he avoids the word “eugenics,” his desire to rehabilitate eugenic discourse is clear:

“[T]he pathway to the future — and to maturity over extinction — is the path of bioenhancement,” Moynihan proclaims near the end of his book.

He then writes: “To truly assume maturity, perhaps, is to realize that we must leave Earth and our evolutionary past behind.”

Throughout X-Risk, he uses precisely such euphemisms. When discussing the work of the turn-of-the-20th-century British geneticist and early x-risk aficionado J. B. S. Haldane, for example, Haldane’s eugenicism is innocuously described as the “daring task of redirecting our own evolution.”

Likewise, when Moynihan suggests that Haldane’s championing of “ectogenesis” — the artificial development of embryos outside the womb — actually anticipates the radical feminism of Shulamith Firestone, he conveniently fails to mention that Haldane conceived of ectogenesis as a tool for eugenic advancement. It could be said that Musk’s intellectual antecedents are anxious British aristocrats who mulled civilizational decline well over a century ago — many of whom were willing to consider extreme strategies à la Musk.

In short, neither Musk’s nor the Oxbridge think tanks’ interest is novel.

In the 19th-century Anglophone world, no single text did more to refashion thinking about human extinction than the publication of Darwin’s on The Origin of Speciesin 1859. It was often viewed as an “outrage” to humanity’s “naïve self-love” (as Freud famously described Darwin’s impact decades later).

But an influential cross section of Darwin’s contemporaries and inheritors saw evolutionary science not as a scythe that cut humankind down to size but as heralding glorious possibilities for human supremacy.

They accepted the assertion that human beings are precarious animals vulnerable to extinction, but they rejected the idea that the human species is not uniquely privileged among organic beings.

After all, we are the only animal capable of being paranoid about our evolutionary future, and potentially able to safeguard it.

Darwin argued that extinction is mundane: a regular feature of the evolutionary process. By making extinction boring — the result of unexceptional changes accumulating over vast stretches of time, rather than of unprecedented and uncontrollable upheavals (as had previously been believed) — evolutionary theory made it possible to view extinction as a long-term risk that might be anticipated, and thus strategized against, in advance.

Early Darwinian science fiction featured the looming threat of interspecies competition, but in fact many mainstream British intellectuals believed that the greatest danger to human survival might be the human species itself.

Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton capitalized on this evolutionary fever, and fear, kicking off the eugenics movement with his 1883 book, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development.

In the decades to follow, Galton’s movement would establish a particularly strong foothold in the United States, where it was dominated by a noxious combination of economic anxiety and racialized nativism. It was British eugenics that was marked by grander ambitions.

The English physician Caleb Saleeby spoke in 1909 for a growing number of British intellectuals when he declared that “eugenics is going to save the world.” This conviction would rapidly coalesce after World War I into the paranoid worldview that inflects existential risk discourse today: the belief that the human species is the only species that has evolved to bear the moral imperative of survival, whatever the cost.

¤

In 1923, J. B. S. Haldane wrote a short book, Daedalus; or, Science and the Future. The first installment in the English publisher Kegan Paul’s infamous “To-day and To-morrow” series, it imagines a future remade by eugenic enhancement.

“Had it not been for ectogenesis, there can be little doubt that civilization would have collapsed […] owing to the greater fertility of the less desirable members of the population in almost all countries,” writes Haldane.

The book ends with an unsettling prediction:

“The scientific worker of the future will more and more resemble the lonely figure of Daedalus as he becomes conscious of his ghastly mission, and proud of it.” The following year, the prominent Oxford philosopher F. C. S. Schiller would pen the next “To-day and To-morrow” contribution.

In Tantalus, or The Future of Man, he warns that humanity’s “future has always been precarious […] because it has always been uncertain whether [our species] would use its knowledge well or ill, to improve or to ruin itself.”

Biological knowledge — politically mediated through eugenics — promised a means by which this improvement might be achieved and existential ruin avoided. Anthony Ludovici, a fellow British philosopher and translator of Nietzsche, would similarly maintain that the stakes of “eugenic mating” were nothing less than “the survival of human life in a desirable form.”

He offered these insights in a 1926 book (part of the same series) on “woman’s future and future woman” in which he opined that birth control should ideally be replaced by “some kind of controlled and legalized infanticide.”

The year 1926 would prove a banner year for eugenicists. Ronald Fisher, a major figure in the “modern synthesis” of Darwinian evolution and Mendelian genetics, would write an ambitious essay entitled, “Eugenics: Can it Solve the Problem of Decay of Civilizations?” which argued that guided evolution might hold the key to permanently safeguarding society from disaster.

These concerns were also taken up by the English schoolteacher Leonard Huxley. The son of Thomas Huxley, Leonard would tarnish the family name with his book Progress and the Unfit, in which he compared Western Europe to declining Rome, with failing racial hygiene as the chief threat to the survival of England and perhaps human civilization itself.

This worry was likewise shared by Leonard Darwin, son of Charles and president of the British Eugenics Society, who in 1925 warned that biological decay would drive civilizational collapse unless the reproduction of the unfit was curbed by eugenic means.

As the decade wound to a close, such pronouncements only grew more dire and disturbing. Charles John Bond, a doctor and euthanasia enthusiast, would deliver the 1928 Galton Lecture in which he proclaimed that the biologically feeble poor were akin to “parasitic cancer cells” that threatened humanity by out-reproducing the wealthy.

Assuming that “civilized” temperament and fecundity were inversely related, he speculated that increasing the fertility of the elites “might prove to be the deciding factor in race survival in the future.”

As for the lower classes? “We ought to welcome the extinction of the degenerate race,” Bond counseled.

Olaf Stapledon, the prodigiously talented author of a number of eugenics-soaked sci-fi masterpieces — much admired by Moynihan in X-Risk — would deliver a national broadcast on “The Remaking of Man” in 1931.

The address waxed in rapturous fashion about our possible eugenic futures while also warning that accidents or terrestrial catastrophes “may easily disinfect the earth of the microbe, man.”

In a modestly titled 1934 tract If I Were Dictator, Stapledon’s friend and esteemed biologist Julian Huxley — son of Leonard, brother of the novelist Aldous — continued this line of inquiry. There, the biologist argued that, while “evolution […] may go backwards, or spread sideways […] or become fossilized,” human intelligence spares us of this fate.

“Other organisms are the passive subjects of evolutionary forces,” Huxley wrote, but “man can become the conscious trustee of Evolution.”

Two years after this pronouncement, in his own Galton Lecture, Huxley would ominously declare that if eugenics was not widely adopted:

“[W]e can be sure of this alarming fact. […] Humanity will gradually destroy itself.”

Less than a decade later, in a bid to end a world war marked by the deranged application of eugenics, two bombs would fall out of a clear blue Japanese sky, ushering humanity exponentially closer to the very destruction Huxley prophesied.

¤

In fleshing out this partial history of existential risk’s entanglement with eugenics, my aim is not to paint contemporary x-risk researchers as mustache-twirling villains.

I had the pleasure of speaking on a panel with Moynihan a few years ago — he came across as thoughtful, modest, and unlikely to be engaged in a malicious conspiracy. Likewise, it seems a stretch to suggest that Nick Bostrom’s philosophy “contains all the ingredients necessary for a genocidal catastrophe,” as the philosopher Phil Torres recently claimed in a rather hyperbolic article for Current Affairs.

What I am saying, though, is that we cannot claim to take existential risk seriously — and meaningfully confront the grave threats to the future of human and nonhuman life on this planet — if we do not also confront the fact that our ideas about human extinction, including how human extinction might be prevented, have a dark history.

Although eugenics was not a univocal movement — in Britain or internationally — the thinkers I highlight above all tended to share the assumption that Darwinian biology (and its synthesis with genetics) marked a turning point, a view shared by most x-risk scholars. This fact bears scrutiny, especially given the growing penetration of tech billionaires into this x-risk space.

In the broadest terms, people like Moynihan, Bostrom, and even Musk are united by conviction that we — or, rather, they — have a profound moral imperative to prevent human extinction and provide a livable world for far-future human beings. These are laudable aims.

Yet, we should also remember that many early eugenicists also had noble aspirations: Haldane was a staunch anti-imperialist who died an Indian citizen, and Julian Huxley was a vocal opponent of racialized eugenics who spoke vociferously against the Nazi program.

Many of them viewed their work as part of the struggle against capitalistic inequality, and yet they also believed in the liberatory potential of eugenics. Any history that attempts to enlist them as Moynihan does in the fight against human extinction must reckon with this complicated legacy.

Today, “man” is no longer the “political animal,” as Aristotle once pronounced. Rather, the human species has become the paranoid animal: the only form of intelligent life able to fear for its future, and now hypothetically (at least according to x-riskers like Musk) capable of using that fear to secure its long-term survival.

It remains to be seen whether human beings at large are capable of leveraging this paranoia in the service of a just future — for those currently inhabiting a rapidly warming Earth as well as those to come — or whether “the good of the species” will continue to be the rallying cry of the elite who desire a world remade in their own image.

In any case, any attempt to secure a future must aim to learn from past hubris.

Here, it is again worth recalling Julian Huxley, who delivered a speech at Madison Square Garden not long after human shadows were transposed onto Hiroshima concrete.

Speaking to an audience of some 18,000 assembled there for a “crisis meeting” on nuclear weapons, the biologist radiated optimism.

In a marked departure from his earlier premonitions of dysgenic collapse, Huxley now opined that the species might yet be saved from existential peril by repurposing the split atom for the common good.

A few hundred atomic bombs might usefully be dropped on the “polar regions,” Huxley cheerfully advised the crowd. He reasoned that the resulting ice melt would transform the Earth, leading to a warmer, more pleasant climate.

Reference: GreatGameIndia.com

https://humansarefree.com/2022/01/elites-are-obsessed-with-end-of-the-world.html

Once Government Acquires A Power, It Never Lets It Go Voluntarily

We often think as we embark on a new year that each year will be similar to the year before and we make our plans accordingly. Obviously the last two years have taught us that this is not always true and yet we say to ourselves after the 2022 and 2024 elections we will get back on track. Will we? Will we get back to normal and will our freedoms not be hindered? We believe that our Constitution and the American traditions of faith and freedom will save us. Maybe it is time to look back in history for a wake up call.

once government acquires a power, it never lets it go voluntarily

Sir John Glubb was a British author and lecturer and a decorated officer in the British army. His famous and succinct essay, “The Fate of Empires and Search For Survival” looks at the lifespan of empires from their origins to their eventual decline. Glubb estimates that most empires do not last longer than roughly 250 years, with many of them lasting much shorter. periods of time.

For example Persia ruled from 538-330 B.C. for only 208 years. Greece 231 years (Alexander and his successors) from 331-100 B.C. The Roman Republic was 233 years and the Roman Empire 207 years. Most recently Britain ruled from 1700 to 1950 and it ended after 250 years. America from 1776 to today is 246 years and from many indicators we are nearing an end of empire and leader of the free world.

Many historians including Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire) and others have given us the stages an empire goes through from beginning to end. Alexander Tyler of the University of Edinburg noted eight stages that articulate well what history discloses.https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

1) From bondage to spiritual growth

2) From Spiritual growth to great courage

3) From courage to liberty

4) From liberty to abundance

5) From abundance to complacency

6) From complacency to apathy

7) From apathy to dependence

8) From dependence back to bondage.

People in bondage no longer have the virtues necessary to fight.

We often think that this is a slow process over decades, which has an element of truth, however when the crumbling of freedom begins it can happen quickly.

Our own experience since March of 2020 is a wake up call to all of us. Studying the rise of Hitler is eerily similar to our own situation. Anticipating an election in March 1933 that he knew he could not win, he chose to create a crisis.

On February 27, 1933, the Reichstag Building (the capital) was in flames. Hitler blamed the arson on a communist conspiracy and induced Paul von Hindenburg (the aged German president) to sign a decree that suspended individual liberties.

The National Socialists (Nazis) could search homes without a warrant, confiscate property, and outlaw the meetings of groups that might oppose them. How similar the situation where it is easier to obey than to accept the dangers of freedom.

A more recent example is Venezuela that in 2001 was the 3rd richest country in the Western Hemisphere and the world’s leader in oil reserves.

In 2001 the people voted for a Socialist President to address “income inequality”. In 2012 Bernie Sanders said “Venezuelans are living the American dream better than Americans”.

Now the economy is in shambles, citizens pick through garbage looking for scraps of food, vital medicines are in short supply and more than three million people have fled the socialist destination of Chavez’s policies.

The currency has collapsed and now they import oil. How quickly a nation can go from freedom to tyranny.

Our country and freedom are undoubtedly under attack and yet we stand out as a beacon and a savior of western civilization compared to Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It is if these countries have gone mad in their attacks on free speech, freedom of religion and our self autonomy.

Rod Dreher wrote an insightful book a few years ago entitled Live Not By Lies that is so important in our culture today.

Recently Rod made a five minute video for Prager University entitled “Totalitarianism: Can it Happen in America?”. This is an important video for all to see. (ANP: 1st video at the bottom of this story!)

Francis Schaeffer in his landmark book How Shall We Then Live? said “The danger in regard to the rise of authoritarian government is that Christians will be still as long as their own religious activities, evangelism, and life-styles are not disturbed.

We are not excused from speaking, just because the culture and society no longer rest as much as they once did on Christian thinking.

Moreover, Christians do not need to be in a majority in order to influence society.” Will churches and Christians speak out?

I will end this column with a quote from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

1.) Once government acquires a power, it never lets it go voluntarily.

2.) Every power that government acquires, using this pandemic as a pretense, it will ultimately abuse to the maximum effect possible. This is a rule that is as certain as gravity.

3.) Nobody has ever complied their way out of totalitarianism. Every time you comply the demands will get greater and greater.

https://www.brighteon.com/embed/6922191d-8bce-411c-84f7-8d8bc9e0fe3f

Sources: AllNewsPipeline.com; YouTube.com

https://humansarefree.com/2022/01/government-abuses-power.html

It Is Now Infinitely Easier To Control A Billion People Than It Is To Kill A Billion People

by Dylan Charles, Waking Times

How many people do you personally know whom spend their creative efforts in life seeking ways in which to control or kill people? They’re out there.

it is now infinitely easier to control a billion people than it is to kill a billion people

In 2008 at a speech at the international affairs think tank Chatham House, the late, great swamp creature Zbigniew Brzezinski (the father of MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinskimade the following comment:

“In early times, it was easier to control a million people than to kill a million. Today, it is infinitely easier to to kill a million people than to control a million.”https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

Brzezinski would know, as he haunted to halls of the world’s most powerful organizations and think tanks for decades. He held a uniquely elitist perspective on the world, and in his classic globalist book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives he shared an inside look at this mindset. Those in power view the entire world as a play ground to be manipulated, controlled, conquered, and destroyed if necessary. Our lives are the pawns of tyrants… as they see it.

This is the curse of government, which is nothing without force and violence, and Brzezinski was a key player and architect of the current global tension we all endure.

I wonder, though, had he lived long enough to play a role in the pandemic power grab, would he have been impressed by advances in the ability to control so many people without deploying troops, smart-bombs and sanctions? My magic eight-ball says, ‘you may rely on it.’

You see, one thing we’ve learned (whether you recognize it or not) is that it is now far easier to control people than ever before. How so?

Simple. You sideline them by programming them to engage in self-sabotage and self-destructive behavior.

And how do you accomplish this?

Mind control.

Mind control comes in many forms, but in essence it is the ability to get people to believe, think, and act against their natural impulses and in accordance with an imposed agenda.

American psychologist and professor emeritus at Stanford University, Phillip Zombardo, refers to mind control as, “the process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition or behavioral outcomes.” His ground breaking research project, The Stanford Prison Experiment,demonstrated that most people are highly susceptible to the influence of group behavior, and that many of us would go so far as to harm others just to be in compliance with the directives of someone in a perceived position of authority.

In today’s fustercluck world, the effects of mind control are evident everywhere, and under present conditions is even manifesting it its most dangerous form… mass psychosis. People living in this dark cloud of disillusionment are easily influenced and will readily sacrifice their own health and well-being in deference to the advice and mandates of ‘experts’ and policy makers who pimp fear then offer a phony respite from it.

Consider how this plays out in our society:

1. Dumb down the population with chemical sedatives including alcohol, pharmaceuticals and toxic food ingredients.

2. Monopolize the media under corporate control. Present biased, toxic opinions as ‘news’ 24 hours a day, deliberately creating division and discord amongst the majority population.

3. Censor any information and opinions which counter the propaganda of the corporate state, making it seem like minority authoritarian positions are of the majority.

4. Entrain the masses to believe that censorship is necessary for their protection, and that to speak out in opposition to the corporate state amounts to a physical threat to their safety.

5. Elevate a culture of celebrity worship, and promote degeneracy and stupidity as virtuous forms of pseudo-rebellion.

6. Indoctrinate children from an early age to learn obedience over critical thinking, while teaching them that the state is infallible no matter how many atrocities it commits.

7. Isolate people from each other. Disconnect them from the grounding and diverse influence of family and friends.

8. Assault the senses of the population with an endless stream of trauma based mind control and fear propaganda.

9. Entrain common people to believe that being broke and poor is virtuous, while encouraging a massive wealth gap between the elites and the rest of society.

10. Destabilize traditional communal and familial structures by encouraging promiscuity, divorce and dysfunctional relationships.

11. Gut the value of the only permissible currency so that typical gender roles are flipped and both members of a nuclear family must work in order to provide a basic life while children their must be sent to expensive daycares and government run schools.

12. Confuse people over simple biological issues like gender, and create a cult of official science followers who are unwilling to acknowledge such basic scientific facts.

13. Destroy the most powerful and capable members of society, the alpha-males, through media campaigns which demonize them.

14. Focus the attention of the masses on an invisible, intangible, omni-present fear such as an unstoppable plague that is constantly changing forms.

15. Require people to seek permission from the government for practically every productive endeavor possible.

16. Corral the masses into a system of technological control which prohibits free association and free enterprise, and punishes those most likely to resist.

15. Elevate the most criminally insane members of government, and give them open-ended, free access to 24 hour monopolized media.

16. Eradicate natural and holistic forms of medicine, corralling everyone into a top-down, one-size fits all, for-profit, absurdly expensive, allopathic medical system.

17. Disconnect people from genuine, personal spiritual connection, so that they live with an insatiable fear of death in constant inner turmoil.

18. Over time, socially engineer a societal tribe of dysfunctional, unhealthy, confused, resentful, broke, state-worshippers who may wish to live a prosperous life, but cannot ever manage to overcome the urges of their subconscious mind’s in order to act in their own best interests.

The end result of all this is an individual who has been so beaten down by circumstance and chronic stress that they require stimulants all day to function, and sedatives all night to cope with the madness of it all.

And conveniently, there just happens to be a coffee shop on every corner and a full service bar on every street.

Nearly all of us engage in self-sabotaging and self-destructive behavior, which is great for guys like Brzezinski, because it makes controlling the masses easier than ever before.

The act of living ‘normally’ in this environment makes you a non-threat to those managing the chessboard. You are controlled by virtue of your inability to stay on your own unique path of self-mastery.

Friends, this is social engineering at its most advanced, and while it’s informative to understand what has happened to our society, your imperative now is to internalize this as a demand to eliminate such influences from your life.

You must seek to understand how these influences have derailed your potential, and then you must engage in the work needed to reconnect you with you inner wisdom and authority.

Self-sabotage is a gift to the elite. It puts you on the sideline of life and has you constantly burning your energy in a permanent war against yourself.

It makes it nearly impossible for you to make positive changes in your life or have a positive impact on your community or this world. It makes you aloof and dependent on the directives of skilled profiteers who utilize the science of the mind against you.

So, yeah, in today’s world it is far easier to control billions of people than to murder them. And unless you commit to taking back control of your life, you are fulfilling your directive as their pawn

https://humansarefree.com/2022/01/easier-to-control-than-kill-a-billion-people.html

1929 Wall Street Crash Was Another Illuminati Assault on Society

wall-street-crash-78075346-08e95275110a4afd80681699e5d72bcb.jpgThe Great Depression was an early example 
of a contrived breakdown of societymuch like the covid hoax. See Covid inthe context of World Wars & Great Depressions,subterfuges designed to enslave and destroy.

 Curiously, Churchill managed to be in the Gallery of the New York Stock Exchange on October 24, “Black Thursday,” with his friend Bernard Baruch, to personally watch the panic below on the exchange floor. Already in early September, when the market was near its highest peak, Baruch had sold his shares and advised Churchill to do the same. Baruch later advertised the fact that he had avoided the disaster, as proof of his investment acumen. It was more likely proof of his well-placed friends in London who had tipped him to the plans of (Bank of England Gov) Montagu Norman, who also financed Adolf Hitler.

Illuminati insider Chaim Rakovsky refers to the 1929 Crash and Great Depression as an “American revolution.” It was deliberately precipitated by the Illuminati for profit, to break the “classical American” character and to take political power.

GODS of MONEY — Ch. 5–Upending the World’s Chess Board 
By F. William Engdahl
Summary by EGEG’s Comments are in Italics(henrymakow.com)

Prelude: 
1861 – U.S.A. became bankrupt = Lincoln suspended the constitution. All fell under Maritime Admiralty Law 
1871 – The ‘Corporation of Washington’ was setup 
1878 – U.S.A. Corporation was setup in the district of Washington that made it it’s own State. 
1929 – Roosevelt rewrote and reorganized a plan given that the USA was bankrupt and again constitution was suspended whereby he pledged US land and people for the debt. 
1933 – The start of using Certificate of Birth (from Maritime Law, birth). It became the pledge of chattel against the fiat currency. 
Corporation of the City of London Inc. and the Bank of England again in the nerve center of the world banking system. 
1925 decision by Chancellor of Exchequer, Winston Churchill a crypto-jew. 
London, they argued, would become the entrepôt for such American loans to Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania and the rest of Europe. Montagu Norman was able to persuade Benjamin Strong, (Fed Gov. 1914-1928) after Britain had come back on the Gold Standard, to lower U.S. interest rates. This allowed gold to go out of New York into London, and thus benefit the role of Sterling as a center of the re-established Gold Standard. 

gods-of-money.jpgThe spectacular collapse of the Wall Street stock market in October 1929, and the ensuing collapse of European financial markets, banks, industry and, ultimately, entire national economies, came as an unimaginable shock to most Americans and Europeans. They had been in no way prepared for what happened. 

How could they be, none were on the inside, and propaganda as in Public Relations by Bernays was well underway.  

By early 1929, call loans had risen almost double to an impressive $6 billion. Low interest rates, fed by Benjamin Strong’s policy of supporting the Pound, were adding fire to a stock market boom unlike any seen before. 

By 1928, the United States possessed more than 40% of total world monetary gold stocks, some $ 4,141,000,000 at the day’s gold standard value. By contrast, France, the second largest holder of gold, held only $1.2 billion, while Britain held a mere $754 million, and Germany, $666 million. From 1921 through the end of 1928, the ample supplies of gold served to ignite the most spectacular financial bubble in American history.  

Here is the financial setup for the crash to come, all manipulated by the UK Banksters-illuminati Rothschild Cabal. 

However, here was also the Achilles heel of the post-Versailles international financial structure. A significant share of the dollars that had been created in the U.S. banking system in the 1920’s began to go to Europe, seeking far higher returns than possible in America. And no country was more the focus of American financial interest than Germany, with its enormous industrial potentials. 

In April 1924 they issued a proposal to place Germany under control of a central reparations authority for the coming 50 years. 

From 1924, when the Dawes Plan was finalized, until the beginnings of the international financial crisis in 1930, fully 62% of all long-term foreign borrowing by German banks, industry and municipalities, an impressive amount of well over 6 billion Reichsmarks ($1,440 million, an enormous sum for its day), came from U.S. banks and financial institutions. 

The amounts of money lent to Germany  by US is staggering once considered what was to follow. 

 Pg 10 — By the end of the 1920’s, partly because of the availability of this flood of American capital, Germany’s economy appeared to the world as vibrant, healthy and growing. But behind the facade, its banks and industry were fragile. 

 Pg 11 –While the newly-created Federal Reserve Bank diligently watched for any hint of inflation in commodity prices during the 1920’s, they had ignited a far more dangerous inflation, that of financial paper. Most domestic bank loans in the 1920’s went directly to finance securities purchases, mostly stocks. 
The Federal Reserve (branch of UK Banksters-illuminati) watched from the side lines as the plan played out just as they set up. 

The private American banking system, backed by the large U.S. gold reserves, had extended credit for purchase of stocks on an unprecedented scale. A vast financial pyramid was under construction. In 1925 alone, as bank loans to stock brokers to finance stock purchases more than doubled, to a record $2.8 billion, the New York Stock Exchange index inflated by 40%. Exactly as has been going on the last number of years; get ready. 
 Pg 12 — But in the growing frenzy by citizens of all walks of life, to share in the new riches of being a stock owner, few took heed of such unthinkable prospects. Sort of like the frenzy going on now with it’s built in arrogance ‘I am right and the gov’t would never kill us off’. 
The total volume of common stock financing by companies increased by 661% between 1926 and 1929, a rise from $579 million to $4,406 million. Not since the 1620’s Holland tulip bulb speculation, had the world seen such a speculative delusion. Pure simple greed based upon stupidity of the masses following like sheep. 

Pg 14 — The remedies prescribed always involve the installing in the central bank of a foreign supervisor, who is British or designated by the Bank of England, which serves both to support the Pound and to strengthen British influence. To guarantee against possible failure, they are careful to secure co-operation of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 

Thus we see the Federal Reserve via Committee at Geneva set out the spiders web of full economic control of all countries. All headed by UK Banksters.  

hatry_thumb.jpgPg 15 — Clarence Hatry (Jewish stock promoter, left)had been blackballed, and as his large business empire collapsed, it triggered the collapse of the London Stock Exchange. On September 20, 1929 the London Stock Exchange Committee suspended share dealings, after three days of panic selling with no buyers. After all, as Norman well knew, the difference between fraud and speculative acumen in finance was often a matter of timing and connections. Montagu Norman was well aware of what he was doing in blackballing Hatry. For want of extending a mere four million Pounds to a British company, Norman allowed the entire post-Versailles international monetary and economic system to collapse. With this move by the Bank of England, a full-scale international crisis was detonated. 

Thus Sept 20 1929 out of City of London Incorporated we see the first domino fall. 

 Pg 18 — By early October, share prices on the New York Stock Exchange had fallen 15% from the pre-Hatry crisis levels of early September. The selling in New York came primarily from investors in the City of London. The value of stocks on the New York exchange had already fallen by 30%, a paper loss of a staggering $26 billion, since the September 1929 peak. It was the beginning of the unwinding of the entire credit structure of postwar America. 

The plan set out by UK Banksters was well underway for total collapse. 

Pg 20 — Curiously, Churchill managed to be in the Gallery of the New York Stock Exchange on October 24, “Black Thursday,” with his friend Baruch, to personally watch the panic below on the exchange floor. Already in early September, when the market was near its highest peak, Baruch had sold his shares and advised Churchill to do the same. Baruch later advertised the fact that he had avoided the disaster, as proof of his investment acumen. It was more likely proof of his well-placed friends in London who had tipped him to the plans of Montagu Norman. 

It is only UK Bankster insiders that get away with fraud; that they orchestrated and ran on a global scale. Just as it is today.
—————-
Related-Illuminati insider Chaim Rakovsky refers to the 1929 Crash and Great Depression as an “American revolution.” It was deliberately precipitated by the Illuminati for profit, to break the “classical American” character and to take political power.

“The man through whom they made use of such power was Franklin Roosevelt. Have you understood? …In that year 1929, the first year of the American Revolution, in February, Trotsky leaves Russia; the crash takes place in October…The financing of Hitler is agreed in July, 1929. You think that all this was by chance? The four years of the rule of Hoover were used for the preparation for the seizure of power in the United States and the USSR: there by means of a financial revolution, and here [Russia] with the help of war [Hitler, World War Two] and the defeat which was to follow. Could some novel with great imagination be more obvious to you?” (273)

https://www.henrymakow.com

Headlines for Jan. 14, 2022

Want to feel good about people, and our animal friends? 

Watch these Dodo videos by people who rescue forlorn creatures.  They are so sweet.These videos remind me that we live in the same moral universe as animals. 
They have souls just as humans do. We may be surprised to learn that mankind’s greatest sin has been animal abuse. 

Goose adopts woman video is wonderful.    
—–Mandatory Vaccines for Truckers entering Canada is back on–starting Sunday!!https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-vaccine-mandate-truckers-cross-border-ottwawa-cbsa/
—-

lucki-brenda.jpg

Get Your Money Out Of The Banks! They Are Stopping The Un Jabbed from Entering Banks, Firing Them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpGCLj-wRrI&t=117s

Scores of unvaccinated workers are filing wrongful dismissal claims against employers, lawyers say

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-scores-of-unvaccinated-workers-are-filing-wrongful-dismissal-claims/

(Canada’s top cop) 

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, left, urged Canadians to report suspicious Internet behavior, including comments by people who express “anti-government, anti-law enforcement” opinions. 

The commissioner’s statement was obtained Monday by Blacklock’s Reporter. 

“When in doubt, report it,” said Lucki. “It’s easy to overlook the seemingly ordinary moments that make up our days.”

The RCMP issued a guide called “Reporting Suspicious Incidents to Police” on Monday that encouraged Internet users to watch out for people with suspicious politics or “anti-authority” views that “include anti-government, anti-law enforcement and anarchist” opinions or “grievance-driven ideologies.”

It’s For Their Health’: Ronald McDonald House Charity in Canada Set To Begin EVICTING Cancer-Stricken Children Over Their Vax Status – YourDestinationNow *******Co-vid Insanity

http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2022/01/its-for-their-health-ronald-mcdonald.html


Website for healthcare industry drones who succumbed to the jab and had adverse reactions-

Gareth Littlewood

 Hi All.

I am really pleased I found this forum and to see other people are suffering similar reactions to myself after the vaccines. I had the first AZ vaccine in May and second in June 2021 . After a week of having the first vaccine I started with the following . Muscle twitching all over the body, popping under the skin , mostly legs , cramps in calves and hamstrings, aching hamstrings, calves, back , shoulders ,neck and arms . Burning skin sensation in upper arms and forearm like the skin is getting dragged off. Urine urgency , going to the toilet more often . Metallic and burning sensation on the tongue that comes and go. Numb fingers , sore fingers .Chest pains on and off. Back spasms when getting out of a chair. Headaches on and off.

media-fear.png
https://www.medscape.com/sites/public/covid-19/vaccine-insights/how-concerned-are-you-about-vaccine-related-adverse-events–

Schrödinger’s Bat:

COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be
protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the
protection that didn’t protect the protected.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/

Why do I feel that Canada discriminates against heterosexual white males and panders to minorities of all kinds?

Helping Black queer workers navigate a system that often fails them
Radhika Panjwani
Special to The Globe and Mail

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-helping-black-queer-workers-navigate-a-system-that-often-fails-them/Top NH Conservative Targeted by Child Services for Giving Son Ivermectin
JR Hoell is the founder of a group critical of COVID-19 vaccine mandates

https://www.theepochtimes.com/top-nh-conservative-targeted-by-child-services-for-giving-son-ivermectin_4197926.html?utm_source=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-01-13-4&utm_medium=email&est=BfBa1lnsS6pyT6L2TC2i9Cf0ZONKfH%2FsqLHDJO00voLm%2FmrxpO75u8iVHg8%3D—– – American Conversations With Vaccine-Injured –

American conversations Hosts Christine Dolan and L Todd Wood speak to Ernest Ramirez, who lost his 16 year old son 5 days after getting the ‘vaccine’.

“They told me it was safe and effective, now my son is dead…”

https://creativedestructionmedia.com/video/2022/01/13/episode-26-american-conversations-with-vaccine-injured-ernest-ramirez/——

Washington Gives Cold Shoulder to Russia’s Security Concerns
The consequences could be dire  by Paul Craig Roberts
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2022/01/11/washington-gives-cold-shoulder-to-russias-security-concerns/
—-
Stew Peters

“Death panels” in Obama Care is used to justify killing people who can easily be cured.
Listen @11mins…A nurse told Annie (the sick mans wife), that he has ended the lives of over 30, 30 year olds (this way).
BREAKING: Doctors Become MURDER Suspects, Pilot Issues WARNING, La Quinta Columna LIVE

Screen-Shot-2022-01-13-at-9.05.19-PM.jpg

Disturbing: Aussie Cops Take Elderly Woman to Jail for Failing to Show Vaccine Papers


Quebec: Unvaccinated father loses right to see his child

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59979408

Supreme Court Blocks Biden’s Covid Mandate for Businesses, But Allows Rule to Stand for Health Care Workers

https://needtoknow.news/2022/01/supreme-court-blocks-bidens-covid-mandate-for-businesses-but-allows-rule-to-stand-for-health-care-workers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=supreme-court-blocks-bidens-covid-mandate-for-businesses-but-allows-rule-to-stand-for-health-care-workers

Dr. Mercola Article: World Council for Health Reveals Spike Protein Detox for Vaxxed People

https://needtoknow.news/2021/12/dr-mercola-article-world-council-for-health-reveals-spike-protein-detox-for-vaxxed-people/

Yachts To Be Exempt From EU’s Carbon Pricing Plan

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/yachts-be-exempt-eus-carbon-pricing-plan

If there is anyone still confused why ESG, and the entire “green” movement is one giant, boiling cauldron of lies, hypocrisy and fraud, read on.


 ‘My job is to help women give birth, but I was banned from using the word “mother”‘
With gender-neutral language becoming obligatory for midwives, RT speaks to one home birthing attendant who has had enough of the “Orwellian trans takeover” and believes it’s time to confront it


https://www.rt.com/op-ed/542475-gender-inclusive-language-perinatal-services/


MakowismMy biggest mistake in life, and regret, was trusting the mass media andformaleducation. Comonflu 19 is gas lighting, but I was gas lit from a tender age by a society that has been inducted into Cabalist Judaism, a satanic cult.

https://www.henrymakow.com

“This Was A Man”—RIP Colin (“Crime Is the New Black Entitlement”) Flaherty, September 21, 1955-January 11, 2022

Earlier, by Peter Brimelow: In Memoriam: Colin Flaherty—Cheerful Chronicler Of Black Crime

The evil that men do lives after them. Unless they are part of, or useful to, the Woke Ruling Class—in which case all is forgiven.

That introductory line is fitting for several reasons. Colin Flaherty was an afficionado of Shakespeare, from whom the line is stolen. And he loved to point out the hypocrisy of the far-Left media, who beatified their martyrs like “St. George of Floyd” and “St. Michael of Brown” while excommunicating Thomas Jefferson and even Abraham Lincoln. And him, and countless others.

Finally, it’s fitting because in the coming year we should expect to see a deluge of celebration and schadenfreude from the Main Stream Media, gleefully noting the passing of another old white guy without any self-awareness or even a hint that they’re just validating the ironic observations of both Mark Antony and Mr. Flaherty.

Colin Flaherty, an award-winning journalist and best-selling author whose career spanned over four decades, died on Tuesday at home, surrounded by friends and family. The cause was cancer, a family member said.

In 1992, Colin Flaherty was the darling of the liberal press, for exposing the truth. At some point in the next decade or two, he would be vilified for the same thing.

Thirty years ago, Colin used his extensive investigative skills to exonerate Kelvin Wiley, a black man wrongfully accused of attempting to murder his white ex-girlfriend. Flaherty won numerous awards for this work, and the case was later featured in the Los Angeles Times [Conviction Set Aside as Boy Recants, by Carol Masciola, August 20, 1992] and on Court TV.

But when the journalism profession orthodoxy moved on to become a publicity mill for the far Left, Flaherty stubbornly clung to his training, his ethics, and his conscience.

So he became a Thought Criminal and needed to be canceled. First by YouTube, then PayPal, then Facebook, and finally Amazon—the tech monopolies moved swiftly to punish Flaherty for his Wrongthink. Twitter remained the only social media giant that put up with him.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1433898095692156945&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Farticle%2Fthis-was-a-man-rip-colin-crime-is-the-new-black-entitlement-flaherty-september-21-1955-january-11-2022%2F&sessionId=9e476a2f6e6931c0945f4ea29331e053a28693af&theme=light&widgetsVersion=86e9194f%3A1641882287124&width=500px

Colin’s Thought Crimes were legion. In two best-selling books, purchased by thousands of other Thought Criminals, he documented the epidemic of black criminality, vastly out of proportion to their presence in the population, and the Regime Media efforts to conceal it. He called this phenomenon “the biggest lie of our generation.”

Future PC Enforcers seeking to sanitize the past for the Ministry of Truth will have their work cut out for them trying to erase Colin’s massive content footprint. He leaves behind thousands of hours of videos, podcasts, and interviews, countless articles on rogue sites like American Thinker, VDARE.com, and American Renaissance.

He also leaves behind about two million subscribers that he had had on YouTube when they canceled him in the middle of last decade; a son and a daughter who had been estranged but with whom he had recently reconciled; and his older brother, who lived with him in Wilmington.

Often accused of racism by the same media whose lies he exposed, Colin was lauded and befriended by many black conservatives, notably Thomas Sowell and Jesse Lee Peterson,below, both of whom wrote laudatory jacket blurbs for his banned books.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=olsb0e9SfJc%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Vilified by the MSM who once loved him, Colin had for the last decade focused his considerable talents “the biggest lie of our generation,” the false Narrative of black victimhood and white racism. Beginning with White Girl Bleed A Lot, published in 2011, Colin covered storiesthat were either neglected or whitewashed by the MSM, who refused to acknowledge the tremendously disproportionate violenceperpetrated by blacks in the US. His follow-on book, Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry,sold even more than the first one and cemented his legacy as a serious exposer of media hypocrisy.

Colin stopped making podcasts about a year and a half ago, but we are reminded of his prescience every day. He was amused by the recent discovery of Critical Race Theory by the MSM, who claimed that conservatives “can’t even define it.” For several years, he had defined it thusly: “White racism is everywhere. White racism is permanent. White racism explains everything.”[A New Poster Child for Black on White CrimeAmerican Thinker, December 26, 2014]

And years before the Ruling Class opened the jails and legalized most black crime in the wake of George Floyd’s death, Colin observed that “crime is the new black entitlement.”

It doesn’t take much digging to see that recent crime statistics bear this out.

In Colin’s penultimate podcast on August 6, 2020, he began with a monologue that encapsulated both his raison d’etre and his acerbic wit:

So what we’re trying to do here is figure out what’s really going on, that’s why I love the video, why I love using these podcasts, using the audio from the videos; once I get my health back, I’m looking forward to getting full tilt into my videos. That’s what I used to say, but man, if you think I have confirmation bias, let’s meet out on the street at high noon and we’ll match video for video, ‘cause I think for every video you have of a white guy behaving badly, I think I have 25 to 100 of a fella misbehaving in a very masochistic, psychopathic way. And just to make it interesting, I think we should make a little wager to see who runs out of videos first, runs out of stories first.

No one ever wants to take me up on this. I mean, what kind of movie would Gunfight At The OK Corral have been if Kirk Douglas [as Doc Holliday] and Wyatt Earp got out there in the street and the Clanton boys didn’t come out to face them down. The Clantons never come out to face us. They always go to the next town over and talk trash about us, about how we have confirmation bias.

This quote, unscripted and yet well-spoken, also gives us a brief peek at Colin’s unbridled optimism that he’d eventually beat his disease.

Sadly, that was not to be. But Colin died as he lived: in his words, without racism, without rancor, and without apology.”

As those of us who knew him would attest, he was well-deserving of another Shakespeare encomium:

“He only in a general honest thought
And common good to all, made one of them.
His life was gentle, and the elements
So mixed in him that Nature might stand up
And say to all the world, “This was a man.”

https://www.unz.com/article/this-was-a-man-rip-colin-crime-is-the-new-black-entitlement-flaherty-september-21-1955-january-11-2022/