Men Love Women Who Empower Them


(Don’t be fooled by the ugly exterior. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is ugly inside as well.) Heterosexuals now face an insidious attack on their gender identity as bad as anything experienced by homosexuals.
Satanist social engineers exemplified by Justice Ruth Bader Ginzburg (left) have tampered with the fundamental sexual alchemy of nature. Heterosexuality is based on the exchange of female (worldly) power for male power expressed as love. This is feminine. Men want power; women want love. Heterosexual union is based on this exchange. (When men trade power for love, they are feminized.) 
By empowering females and emasculating males (“gender equality”), Satanists (Communists) have sabotaged male-female complementarity and the lives of millions. 
The heterosexual male has a natural instinct to lead his wife lovingly. Heterosexual females want to be lovingly led by their husbands. A man loves a woman because she entrusts her power to him. He wants to possess her entirely, and she longs to be possessed. This is played out in the sex act. He always respects her individuality because he wants her to want to belong to him. 
A woman cannot respect or love any man she can control or dominate. Trusting a man is the way a woman shows she loves him. Men understand this instinctively. 
The Illuminati are Satanists who believe in corrupting what is natural and healthy. The fact that media and government are attacking heterosexuality is a sign of how far subversion has gone.

Disclaimer– I realize this is not the only template for a successful marriage. But it may help many men and women who are lost.

Below, Melanie describes a working model of marriage. A woman accepts her husband’s leadership and he uses this power to make her happy. A man won’t take responsibility for what is not his. Female submissiveness is an expression of female love. 

“I realize now that when I was in control, the image I reflected back to my husband was the image of someone not entirely necessary, not entirely competent, not worthy of my trust and confidence. And he lived like that person. Now we are both transformed.”


Updated from Nov 15, 2016The joy of the master-queen dynamic-king by Melanie (Abridged by

Since my husband became head of our home and our relationship, he just can’t do enough to make me happy. I’m still trying to figure out exactly why this dynamic works the way it does. Before I became submissive, I was sure he didn’t care about my feelings. He would create problems for me by leaving important things undone. It just didn’t seem like he cared enough to make the effort. He didn’t want to be reminded of his responsibilities or asked to do anything more.
How could a man really care about me and yet care so little about making me happy? Yet I knew he loved me. I knew he wanted me to be happy. He often said so, and he often expressed his love very convincingly in words and lovemaking. So why not in particular, important actions? This was so puzzling and frustrating to me.
A piece of the puzzle fell into place when I realized how important self-determination is to him. He has to do things because he wants to. He has to take on responsibilities and obligations freely; once he’s taken them on, he’ll just about kill himself to meet them. But if he feels the responsibility or obligation foisted on him from without, he just won’t accept it. He just won’t do it, even if it’s something “everyone does” or “a good husband does”. If he hasn’t chosen it, you can just forget it. I could beat my head against a wall until I went unconscious trying to get him to do things that I thought he should do because everyone else’s husband does that, or because it’s only fair, or whatever.
When he became the head of the household and of our relationship, there was a shift in the way he viewed himself, and me, and our home, and our life. He seems to have a heightened sense of ownership, a heightened sense of being the man of the house, and a sudden willingness to do things. Suddenly he wants to help me with the dishes and make the bed! He seems to feel that everything is more “his” than it was before: me, the house, the money. And it is indeed more his, in the sense that he has more control over all those things.
Ownership is basically having control over. Although we use the word “mine” to describe things that are merely connected with us, real possession implies control. I believe the sense of ownership ties us (his home and family) to his self-determination somehow. We are not so much things outside himself, demanding onerous duties; we are part of him, and doing things for us is more like doing things for himself. Furthermore, being in command means he makes decisions and carries them out. He does things because he decides they should be done, not because I told him about them or reminded him of them.
What does it mean to own another human being? Obviously, slavery springs to mind as an ugly institution that has fortunately been mostly stamped out. To own a person as if the person were an object, having total control over their destiny and no regard for their feelings, is obviously not good. But when a person desires to be possessed by another, this can be wonderful…
A man sees himself reflected in the eyes of his woman. She can make him look small, incompetent, and weak. Or she can make him look strong, heroic, larger than life, a good man and true. And seeing himself so, he can be all that. In this way, her submission and trust make him a hero. A hero who holds her happiness and well-being in his hands. He will cherish that happiness and well-being above everything–above his own, perhaps–because that hero in her eyes is worth more to him than money, status, or his own comfort. This is the dynamic of the master and his queen. He cannot do enough for her because of the way she sees him.
I didn’t see myself as a controlling woman, but I suppose I was. It’s not a bad thing to be; it all depends on the circumstances. Sometimes a woman’s survival depends on it. But when a woman would be happier if she had less control and she still won’t give it up, I think it’s because she was wounded at some point. Perhaps she was orphaned in childhood, or abused, or abandoned by her parents. Perhaps she was hurt in adolescence by selfish, uncaring men. Whatever happened, something convinced her that she was on her own, that if she didn’t take care of herself, no one would. She is, you might say, a woman warrior in a hostile world.
When a woman like this submits to a man and gives him control of her life, is this not a truly awesome gift? She is telling him that he inspires enough trust to overcome all her doubts. Is this not a much greater gift than the submission of an untroubled girl who has been cherished all her life?
I realize now that when I was in control, the image I reflected back to my husband was the image of someone not entirely necessary, not entirely competent, not worthy of my trust and confidence. And he lived like that person. Now we are both transformed.

Possession is the Essence of Marriage


Women exchange power for love. Sex is symbolof this exclusive contract. Sex is an act of domination and possession. 
Women are damaged when they give themselves to a man and are then dismissed.  

(Disclaimer – I am not trying to impose this template but rather to say that it has worked for centuries. 
This is why the usual suspects are trying to destroy it.) 

Possession is Part of Marriage (Updated from Dec. 2009 and April 1, 2018)by Henry Makow Ph.D. 

My wife recently asked me why I loved her. 
Rather than enumerate her good qualities, I answered honestly: “Because you belong to me.”

submissive-wife (1).jpg

At the risk of being politically incorrect,  many men do not seek great beauty, brains or sex, but the simple feeling of “possessing” a woman. In other words, what they seek is a degree of ownership or power. This is part of masculine identity.

And many women have the complementary desire, to be possessed, to totally “belong” to their husband.  
In a blog post, Joseph William, in his thirties, claims he has slept with 100 women and nearly all of them wanted to be dominated in bed.  They wanted the man to take charge. This has a general application.  Women need men to take the initiative. They acquiesce or reject. 
The essence of heterosexuality is the exchange of female power for male power expressed as love. This is the heterosexual contract. If a woman is not submissive or a man unloving, the contract has been broken, and they must consider separation. 

When a woman surrenders to her husband, she gives him the power to grant her wishes, or not. He does not exploit, control or dominate. He respects her individuality and freedom. He wants her to want to be his. He consults and nurtures.  He makes the final decision.  Every family needs a head. A creature with two heads is a monster. 

We have a powerful hunger to become one with another personTwo people only can become one when a woman surrenders to her husband. This is how women love. Two people cannot become one if they have competing agendas.  
The greater a woman’s acceptance of her husband’s leadership, the greater his love for her. When the issue of worldly power is settled, a husband’s sense of self expands to encompass his wife. She becomes part of his ego. He knows that her child is his.


He loves her passionately because she has given herself to him. She has given him everything he wants. 
Women were designed to crave a man’s passionate and exclusive love. But feminism ensures they will never get it because it teaches them to be “independent.” 
In “The Power of Sexual Surrender”psychiatrist Marie Robinson writes that femininity is based on “an essential female altruism” i.e. putting husband and children first.  Real women do not seek power. They seek love. They are cherished because they dedicate themselves to husband and children.

Women express love in terms of surrender, i.e. trust. She empowers her husband by submitting to him.  Thus, she inspires him to sacrifice for her and their children. Women domesticate men and give them purpose. 

Of course, this surrender applies only to the man she loves, the man who has courted her and won her love. If she gives her trust to the wrong man, that is her responsibility. 

Women have about 20 years of peak sex appeal. They have to seal a deal before they lose it. They are the sellers. Men are the buyers. 

When men treat women as sex goddesses, sex objects or prey, as society teaches, they are doomed to fail. 

Men need to approach women as they are, fallible human beings with normal human desires. 

They need to get to know a woman as friends and decide if they want a deeper relationship.
Women need sex but they want love (an honest human relationship) more. Take an enema and purge everything Hollywood has taught you about love and sex. It is bullshit.
 Lasting love is not based on sex appeal or sparkling repartee. You can have great sex with a woman who is not conventionally beautiful. All women are beautiful in the sex act. Lasting love is based on mutual dependence. 

A man must decide what he wants to do with his life, and then find a woman who will help him achieve his goal. 

CONCLUSIONBecause the Illuminati bankers control the media and nearly everything else, most of us are ignorant of how egregious and criminal their social engineering is. 
Men are active by nature; women are passive. This is the basic yin-yang of nature.  By messing with this dynamic, Illuminati social engineers (black magicians?) are throwing a spanner in the gears of human reproduction and happiness. Their promotion of homosexuality to heterosexual children is criminal. They should be charged with child abuse. 
This is what Satanists do–override nature. They are evil. They hate us and we have every right to hate them and their minions (liberals) in government, education and the media. 

RelatedHaving Sex is not Making Love Men Love Women Who Empower Them
Relearning Heterosexual Love
Feminism is a Poisoned Apple