Home | UW | Archives | Reference | Contact | 

Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Preparing for Monetary Collapse (scroll down) ———————–Latest info gab.com/hmakow 

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |    

Digital IDs Wll Make World a High-Tech Prison 

August 20, 2021 https://www.youtube.com/embed/0DMu8dLyTdQ

Video — Canadian Gov’t digital ID propaganda: Canada’s trusted digital identity vision – YouTube

Vaccine passports won’t last but they pave the way for digital IDs, which the bankers and their globalist lackeys have been planning for years. If we allow digital ID to become a reality, life will become even more restricted and controlled than it has been during the scamdemic.  

by CR

(henrymakow.com)

Many countries and jurisdictions around the world are in the process of implementing vaccine passports, but these passports are unlikely to be around for long due to the ethical and legal issues surrounding them. 

Not only is it a violation of the Nuremberg Code to force or coerce medical treatment without informed consent, but the persecution and segregation resulting from the vaccine passports is a violation of the Statute of Rome of the International Criminal Court, in addition to breaching numerous other human rights laws around the world. 

In short, it can’t last, and courts are already ruling against vaccine passports: The Supreme Court knocks down covid passport to enter bars, restaurants and nightclubs in Andalucia. 

Vaccine passports won’t last but they pave the way for digital IDs, which the bankers and their globalist lackeys have been planning for years. This has the potential to rob us of our rights just as covid lockdowns have done.

In 2005, current British PM Boris Johnson said that digital IDs are “recipes not just for waste but recipes for tyranny and oppression as well”, and in 2004 that “There is the loss of liberty, and the creepy reality that the state will use these cards — doubtless with the best possible intentions — to store all manner of detail about us, our habits, what benefits we may claim, and so on.” A rather odd stance for someone who would go on to implement vaccine passports. 

An 2018 article on the Canadian Bankers Association site (White Paper: Canada’s Digital ID Future – A Federated Approach) argues that “Canada needs a digital identity system” which will include “biometrics such as fingerprints or facial recognition.” 

This echoes the “Lock Step” scenario described in a 2010 report from the Rockefeller Foundation which envisages a global pandemic nearly identical to the covid situation we are facing that results in the implementation of biometric ID, among other things. 

The Thales Group, 25% owned by the French government, says that “So-called digital ‘vaccination passports’ will play a key role in enabling citizens to access all manner of services and will act as a precursor to the rollout of mobile digital IDs.” 

How Digital ID can help citizens access government services from anywhere – Thales blog (thalesgroup.com) 

This is in line with the EU’s plan for 80% of citizens to use digital ID by 2030: Europe’s Digital Decade: digital targets for 2030 | European Commission (europa.eu)

Jamaica, where the vast majority of people are refusing covid vaccines, already has a plan for a digital/biometric ID, including retina scans and fingerprints, which will be required to access government services and to deal with various businesses such as banks – this is not a plan for the distant future, it is here already: National Identification System (NIDS) – Office of the Prime Minister (opm.gov.jm) 

For now digital IDs will be in smartphones and computers, but how long until it becomes a microchip implanted in people’s bodies? 

All it will take is some major fraud or a terrorist attack and the ID will have to be under your skin to prevent identify theft. 

Just imagine the 9/11 hijackers had used stolen smartphones with digital ID to board the planes, then look at all the security measures put into place after 9/11 and now how quickly millions of people submitted their bodies to a society-wide drug trial. 

 Klaus Schwab and his globalist stooges have warned us that “there is no going back to normal”.  

If we sit back and allow digital ID to become a reality, life will become even more restricted and controlled than it has been during the scamdemic.  

Trump and his associates have already had bank accounts closed by institutions that don’t like their politics – this could soon be the reality faced by citizens who don’t readily submit to the Great Reset agenda.  

Our purchases will be monitored and controlled while our movements will be tracked in real time.  

You won’t need a cop to stop you to determine whether you left your home for authorized reasons, your smartphone will do that and alert the authorities or issue you a fine. 

The world will become a high-tech prison.

https://www.henrymakow.com

The Department of Defense will require all U.S. military troops to take the COVID-19 vaccine by September 15th. The Associated Press earlier reported on Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s memo.

by Kyle Becker

The AP reported that “the deadline could be pushed up if the vaccine receives final FDA approval or infection rates continue to rise.”

“I will not hesitate to act sooner or recommend a different course to the President if l feel the need to do so. To defend this Nation, we need a healthy and ready force,” the Defense Secretary added.

An Armed Forces member refusing to take the vaccine is subject to punishment under the U.C.M.J., the AP’s report noted. The punishment for refusal to obey an order may escalate up to court martial.

“Some unvaccinated service members have suggested they’d get the shot once it’s required, but others are flatly opposed,” the report said.

Now, some of those ‘flatly opposed’ soldiers are filing a lawsuit in court against the coming military vaccination mandate.

Those listed on the lawsuit as defendants are Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Health & Human Services Xavier Becerra, and Janet Woodock, Acting Commissioner of the Food & Drug Administration.

“Plaintiffs Staff Sergeant Daniel Robert, U.S. Army, and Staff Sergeant Holli Mulvihill, USMC, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated active duty, National Guard, and Reserve servicemembers, as documented survivors of COVID-19, file this action against the Department of Defense (“DoD”), seeking a declaratory judgment that the DoD cannot force them to take a COVID-19 vaccination under existing military regulations, federal regulations, federal law, and the U.S. Constitution,” the plaintiffs’ legal complaint states.

“The Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin (the “SECDEF”) has publicly notified Plaintiffs, via Memo, that he will seek authorization from the President of the United States of America (the “President”), to mandate the COVID-19 vaccine on or about September 15, 2021,” the plaintiffs note.

“Upon information and belief, the DoD is already vaccinating military members in flagrant violation of its legal obligations and the rights of servicemembers under federal law and the Constitution.”

“Army Regulation 40-562 provides documented survivors of an infection, a presumptive medical exemption from vaccination because of the natural immunity acquired as a result of having survived the infection,” the legal complaint added.

“General examples of medical exemptions include the following… Evidence of immunity based on serologic tests, documented infection, or similar circumstances,” the lawsuit cites.

“Plaintiffs also seek a declaratory judgment on the separate basis that the Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) DoD COVID-19 Vaccine mandate, which they have been notified is imminent, cannot be issued in violation of 10 U.S.C. §1107 [U.S. Code] and its implementing regulations, including DoD Directive 6200.2, the FDA regulation of biologics at 21 C.F.R. § 50 et seq., as well as the law regarding informed consent 50 U.S.C. 1520 (‘The Nuremburg Code’),” the lawsuit added.

Legal analysts cite prior situations that suggest that legal challenges to the COVID vaccine order may fail in court.

“Legally, vaccines under emergency use authorization require service members to grant ‘informed consent’ to receive one, which they are allowed to withhold,” U.S. News reports.

“The law states a president may override that concern in the ‘interests of national security,’ according to an analysis from Duke University’s Lawfire blog in February.”

Robert Sanders, chair of the National Security Department at the University of New Haven, pointed to the case of troop vaccination to protect them from anthrax.

A follow-on case found such orders did not violate troops’ constitutional rights because, “The requirement to place the needs of the nation above a service member’s personal welfare applies in peacetime as well as in war.”

Professor Sanders gave his assessment of legal challenges to the military vaccination order. “I believe such challenges will fail on the merits under the history of the anthrax vaccine’s military litigation,” he said.

The plaintiffs are also submitting in their lawsuit expert testimony from Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., who is board certified in internal medicine and was the Chief Fellow at William Beaumont Hospital.

In addition to being a cardiologist, he also holds a Master’s Degree in Public Health from the University of Michigan. He is currently a Professor of Medicine at Texas Christian University and the University of North Texas Health Sciences Center School of Medicine.

The relevant portion of the doctor’s testimony is submitted in text image format below:

“To put it concisely and bluntly, people who have naturally created antibodies resulting from contracting and recovering from the Virus should not receive any inoculation against the virus or any family or variant thereof becuase it will do more harm than good,” Dr. McCullough is testifying.

The Pentagon has yet to formally issue the vaccine mandate, but the order is expected to be issued in September.

https://humansarefree.com/2021/08/soldiers-lawsuit-vaccine-mandate.html