Month: July 2023

https://www.unz.com/article/how-america-got-an-antiracist-constitution/

http://come-and-hear.com/dilling/dcontents.html

THE CZECH DEFECTOR GEN. JAN SEJNA

“By now, the Marxist Biden Regime (which is 95 percent Zionist or Bolshevik-Zionist) has wholly succeeded in depleting the USA’s stock of arms and ammunitions, by using the ploy of the Ukraine War and by collapsing the supply chains (notably from China) so that the USA will soon have great difficulty in replenishing its stocks of arms and ammunition.”

“In the plan of the satanic CHABAD, the age of the Antichrist is intended to coincide with the genocide of most Christians.”

by Patrick O’Carroll
(henrymakow.com) 
In 1968, Gen. Jan Sejna tipped off Czech leader Alexander Dubcek that Russia was about to invade Czechoslovakia; then Sejna promptly defected to the USA (via the US Consulate in Trieste-Italy) to become one of the most prominent Eastern Bloc functionaries to ever defect during the entirety of the staged “cold” war. Sejna later became a counterintelligence analyst for the Central Lack-Of-Intelligence Agency (CIA) in Langley VA.

In his 1982 book “We Will Bury You”, Jan Sejna warned that communism was soon about to “fake its own death” by collapsing the Warsaw Pact but also by ultimately disarming the USA and NATO. In a way, Sejna was proven right, but with some reservations.

He was RIGHT about communism “faking its own death but not going away”: He was also RIGHT about communism “disarming the USA”:
By now, the Marxist Biden Regime (which is over 95 percent Zionist or Bolshevik-Zionist) has wholly succeeded in depleting the USA’s stock of arms and ammunitions, by using the ploy of the Ukraine War and by collapsing the supply chains (notably from China) so that the USA will soon have great difficulty in replenishing its stocks of arms and ammunitions. Recently, analyst Steve Quayle highlighted this alarming fact.

But he was WRONG about true communism: Britain’s Marxist Fabian Society in London has been a key organization directing the spread of communism throughout the world since 1884.
George Orwell was a committed Fabian and a top-degree Freemason. In his novel “1984”, he used the name “IngSoc” to denote the Marxist Fabian Society. His term “Outer Party” signified what is today the Zionist combo of London’s Chatham House (RIIA) and New York’s CFR (Harold Pratt House NYC). His term “Inner Party” signified even more powerful world-tyranny bodies such as the Committee of 300, Council of 13, Bilderberg, Skull & Bones and other groups (many nameless) centered on All Souls College Oxford. 

Finally, the name “1984” (for his entire book) reflected the Marxist Fabian BOAST that they would only need 100 years to completely enslave Britain (and the world too, given that Britain has always served as “the embryo of world tyranny”). Because Orwell’s title was really celebrating the date 4 Jan 1884, on which Britain’s Marxist Fabian Society was originally founded. In the event, Orwell’s “100-year boast” has not panned out YET but its gradualism or incremental method simply means that Marxist Fabianism is still biding its time before Marxism shall completely strangulate the whole world. Today’s students at major US universities are regularly given courses from, or at, the London School of “Economics” in order to ensure that all future US leaders and captains of industry will embrace the Marxist ideology. 
Indeed, in paraphrased form, Larry Fink stated that democracy is “no longer suited to modern capitalism because people have disparate opinions that are NOT MINE, so hence TOTALITARIANISM is infinitely more suitable nowadays”.

Overall, Jan Sejna was right that communism was not going away, but for the wrong reason. The real reason communism was not going away is because it is, and always has been, backed by all four of the main entities of the Zionist London-NY-Alliance or Zionist Cabal (the English monarchy, the City of London, the “Monopoly Capitalists” of Wall Street (often called the “Illuminati” bloodlines), and the Zionist House of Rothschild). Many “sheeple”-slaves are shocked to learn that, for 200 years, the top oligarchs have always been STRICT Marxists.

Communism was never a grassroots affair to “save”, “serve”, or “protect” the slave class but always a top-down-driven tyranny to MANAGE the slave class for the oligarchs, and to transfer the wealth of the middle class up to the oligarchs. The main aim of Marxist Fabianism, or communism, has only ever been to create a TWO-TIER society, where the top tier in Russia was called “Nomenklatura” but all other folks were referred to as “Proletariat”.

And today, the same Zionist London-NY-Alliance or Zionist Cabal is behind the new and revamped version of communism that was given the newer “cool and trendy” label of Technocracy. By 2050, the middle class is to be completely fleeced and enslaved, while all mid-sized enterprises are to disappear.

THE THEOLOGY OF COMMUNISM BACKED BY THE TALMUDIC CHABAD

Separately, communism and Technocracy are also supported by the satanic CHABAD. In a ceremony in 1990, the satanic CHABAD effectively declared Benjamin Netanyahu to be the “Moshiach ben Joseph” for this age. That is the satanic equivalent of John the Baptist since Netanyahu’s role (as “Moshiach ben Joseph”) is to prepare the way for the Antichrist (whom the satanic CHABAD calls “Moshiach ben David”). In the following solemn ceremony, Benjamin Netanyahu behaves like a pandering bootlicker to the CHABAD despot Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who keeps reminding him incessantly of his DUTY to usher in the Antichrist:

Many speculated that Schneerson himself was the Antichrist (“Moshiach ben David”) but he denied that because, he explained, the Christians had “unfortunately” NOT YET been genocided during his lifetime (1902-94) and one TOP condition for the Antichrist is that most Christians get “wiped from the face of the Earth” under his rule. In the plan of the satanic CHABAD, the age of the Antichrist is intended to coincide with the genocide of most Christians.

https://www.henrymakow.com

http://www.granddesignexposed.com/george/orwell.html

Up to 80 percent of divorces are initiated by women. The main reason is because these women want “me time.” They’re tired of sacrificially giving their lives to their families. It’s time for them to find “fulfillment” and experience life to its fullest, so they leave and destroy their children’s lives.

Many of them have husbands who work hard to provide for them. Their husbands are faithful to them and love their children, but this just isn’t enough. There’s more “out there.” They don’t understand that they are pilgrims on this earth just passing through.

They don’t understand that as they pour their lives into their husbands as their helpers and into their children as their mothers, they are fulfilling God’s perfect will for them, thus storing their treasures in heaven if they are believers in Jesus Christ. They don’t understand that they will reap what they have sown.

Instead of having her husband and children rise up in her old age and call her blessed and praise her, they will want nothing to do with her since she pursued her wants and desires instead of doing what is right and good. She was a lover of pleasure rather than a lover of God and will only reap bitterness and sorrow.

She is loud and stubborn; her feet abide not in her house.
Proverbs 7:11

https://thetransformedwife.com/women-divorcing-over-me-time/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk6fuLOyZbg

https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/zora-neale-hurston-a-black-woman-we-can-admire/

Question answered by Tony Capoccia

Question:

Could you elaborate on the ministry of “women evangelists.” I’m thinking now of Billy Graham’s second daughter, Anne Graham Lotz (AGL). She actually is not preaching in a “church” or “worship” setting, so many say it’s okay for her to go out and preach to large crowds (usually made up of “believers,” men and women), because this is not a “church” setting. I’m really having a hard time justifying this in my mind. I see it as usurping the male authority. Perhaps I’m wrong, but I’d like your thoughts (and scripture) on this matter. I do know that AGL purports to be a “preacher.” I don’t know if she’s been ordained. Thanks for any insight you may be able to give me.

Answer:

Let me say that I believe that Anne Graham Lotz is very wrong in what she is doing and is going against the principles outlined in the Word of God.

In the verses that speak about “women being silent in the churches,” and “not to teach or to have authority over a man” (1 Timothy 2:12), the context and the spiritual principle is that a woman is not to preach or teach in a “Church Ministry” to men, and in most cases women. The Church’s ministry is not confined to a church building or a worship service. The ministry of the Church extends to Evangelists, Missionaries, Revival Meetings, any kind of public ministry of the Word, to include Bible Studies and Sunday School classes.

The very clear reason why God has restricted women from preaching and teaching the Word, in the role of a pastor, elder, teacher, evangelist, missionary, or other public ministry, is given to us in the Bible:

“For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.” (1 Timothy 2:14)

God formed the man first and the woman is to serve him as a “helper” (Genesis 2:18) and not to teach or lead him. Also, the woman was deceived by Satan, and Adam was not, therefore we see that women, in general, are more easily led into error and deception than are men. I really feel that even when women teach other women, that they have to be very careful about what they are teaching. A woman leading a woman’s Bible study could easily teach false doctrine.

The Bible indicates what areas women are to teach:

“…they (older women) may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.” (Titus 2:4-5)

It appears that a woman’s teaching ministry is to be to other women and focused on domestic matters. I feel it would be a violation of Scripture for a woman to “preach” a worship service consisting only of women, unless the clear purpose of gathering the ladies together was to teach them according to the mandate in Titus 2:4,5.

Now, women are free to share anything from the Word when doing personal discipleship and witnessing. The big difference here being the amount of impact of their teaching. In a one-on-one ministry, any errors taught will have minimal impact, but from the pulpit it could and would have a much greater effect.
Also, women can teach children, but always under the oversight of the husband at home, and the church leaders when in a children’s Sunday School class.

Another thought to bear in mind is that no women were ever chosen to be priests in the Old Testament nor were they chosen as Apostles in the NT. God did use a few women for “special” ministries of His choosing, for example, “a Prophetess” (Exodus 15:20, Judges 4:4, 2 Kings 22:14, Isaiah 8:3, Luke 2:36, Acts 21:9), but these were very limited in scope and are not valid for today. The role of a Prophetess is not listed in the list of “gifts” given to the Church, by Christ, as listed in the Book of Ephesians: “It was he (Jesus) who gave some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be pastors and teachers, to prepare God’s people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up.” (Ephesians 4:11-12)

https://thetransformedwife.com/what-about-women-evangelists/

https://www.unz.com/article/rasputin-a-tool-of-the-jews/