An Orchestrated Fake “Covid Pandemic” Was Used to Destroy Health, Civil Liberty and the Doctor/Patient Relationship

An Orchestrated Fake “Covid Pandemic” Was Used to Destroy Health, Civil Liberty and the Doctor/Patient Relationship

Paul Craig Roberts

Dear Readers, give the extraordinary coercive Covid vaccination program a moment of thought. What explains the emphasis, even the use of tyrannical methods in free societies, to force vaccination on populations when even Big Pharma and the corrupt medical establishment only claim a short-run and steeply declining protection from the vaccine? According to the medical establishment itself, double-vaxxed is no longer protection. Booster shots are needed every six months for the rest of your life. 

This is especially puzzling when we consider the known facts that (1) The mortality of Covid is very low. It kills mainly those with co-morbidities and those who are untreated or wrongly treated. (2) The vaccine reduces our natural immunity. (3) The vaccine causes a large number of adverse reactions including deaths and lifelong disabilities. The CDC and WHO admit that the adverse reactions reporting system vastly underreports deaths and adverse reactions from the vaccine. No vaccine or medicine ever before in history has been kept in use that produced even a tiny fraction of the reported deaths and injuries. (4) The vaccine causes variants that are immune to the vaccine and to the weakened immune system of the vaccinated. New vaccines are needed to deal with the new variants, producing still more new variants. (5) The medical establishment has blocked to the extent of its ability the treatment of Covid with two known, safe, effective, and inexpensive medicines–Ivermectin and HCQ. Doctors who have saved lives with these medicines have been fired for using them. (6) Distinguished and renowned scientific and medical experts, including Nobel laureates, have been censored and deplatformed for warning about the dangerous vaccine and advocating effective treatment instead. (7) The media speaks with one lying voice that vaccination is our only hope. (8) Evidence from a number of countries (I have reported it) demonstrates that Covid cases and deaths rise with vaccination and that the majority of cases and deaths for most age groups are the vaccinated. (9) The science is clear that the vaccinated spread the virus as easily, or more so, than the unvaccinated. (10) Indeed, the evidence is clear that the unvaccinated relying on natural immunity are better protected than the vaccinated.

With these known, established scientific facts, what is the justification for mass vaccination? Why the emphasis on vaccinating children when it is known that the spike protein attacks ovaries and testes unless the plan is to reduce fertility? Why can ignorant talking heads on TV who can barely spell their own name feel secure attacking renowned scientists who are telling us the truth?

There are certainly many sound reasons to conclude that the “Covid pandemic” is an orchestrated plot. 

What are the obvious elements of the plot? (1) Profits forever for Big Pharma, the medical school recipients of Big Pharma grants, the profits of patents shared with NIH and NIH personnel, campaign contributions for Senators, Representatives and presidential candidates. (2) The use of fear to remove civil liberty protections and extend control over people. These two elements are obvious. 

The third element of the plot is almost as obvious but much harder for many people to believe–population reduction. Before scoffing, ask yourself: (1) why vaccinate children, who are essentially unaffected by Covid, with a vaccine known to attack the reproductive system and to cause abortions. (2) Why vaccinate anyone when there are known, safe, and inexpensive cures? (3) Why attack these cures as dangerous and strive to prevent their use? How can the medical establishment claim safety and caution for blocking Ivermectin and HCQ when it has unleashed a dangerous experimental vaccine on the world’s population? (4) Why suppress the warnings of renowned experts? If the vaccine was the only solution or even a solution, it could stand public discussion. 

Consider that the World Economic Forum has had a half century to indoctrinate and brainwash business and other leaders. Founded January 24, 1971, the annual meeting in Davos has become a prestigious event. Leaders compete for invitations as attendance is a sign of prestige. The World Economic Forum is financed by 1,000 multi-billion dollar global corporations whose leaders have been sold on the “Great Reset” comprised of population reduction and the termination of national sovereignty and human autonomy. The “Great Reset” is a prescription for tyranny.

The orchestrated push for universal vaccination is so extreme that countries formerly considered part of the “free world” are now totalitarian states–witness Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Italy. The effort to extend the tyranny into France and Germany is meeting with strong public resistance. In America the main resistance comes from nurses and other medical-related personnel who have witnessed the devastating impact of the vaccine on those injected.

Every person needs to consider the implication of silencing independent experts who know the truth while ignorant talking heads dictate the official narrative. 

When truth is murdered, so is all freedom, all morality, all justice. Are you just going to sit there and let it happen?

The PCR “Covid Test” Was Used to Create the Appearance of a Pandemic

Nobel Prize Laureate Kary B. Mullis was the inventor of the polymerase chain reaction technique, which is analyzed in this article.
Dr. Kary B. Mullis, who passed away on August 7, 2019 at age 74, stated emphatically that no infection or illness can be accurately diagnosed with the PCR-RT.  
“PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick.  … The measurement is not accurate”. 
Mullis described the PCR-RT as a “technique” rather than “a test”.  

https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucleic-acid-testing-technologies-use-polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959 

7,200 physicians and medical scientists worldwide have signed the “Rome Declaration” to alert citizens about the deadly consequences of Covid-19 policy makers’ and medical authorities’ unprecedented behavior

https://www.globalresearch.ca/thousands-physicians-medical-scientists-sign-rome-declaration-protest-launch-new-information-platform/5757188 

57 Top Scientists and Doctors Release Shocking Study on COVID Vaccines and Demand Immediate Stop to All Vaccinations

https://www.globalresearch.ca/57-top-scientists-doctors-release-shocking-study-covid-vaccines-demand-immediate-stop-all-vaccinations/5746848 

A Letter to the Unvaccinated

https://www.globalresearch.ca/letter-unvaccinated/5752287

An Orchestrated Fake “Covid Pandemic” Was Used to Destroy Health, Civil Liberty and the Doctor/Patient Relationship

Elon Musk Challenges UN Over Child Abuse Sex Scandal

by Paul Joseph Watson

During a Twitter debate over whether vast amounts of money can solve world hunger, Tesla founder Elon Musk challenged the United Nations over its child sex abuse scandal.

elon musk challenges un over child abuse sex scandal

Much of the media coverage of the issue has centered around Musk’s response to David Beasley, director of the UN’s World Food Programme, who told CNN last week that a $6 billion donation from Musk could rescue 42 million people who are “literally going to die if we don’t reach them.”

Dr. Eli David pointed out that the UN World Food Programme (WFP) couldn’t “solve world hunger” with a budget of $8.4 billion.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1454475769200185349&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2021%2F11%2Felon-musk-challenges-un-over-child-abuse-sex-scandal.html&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

“If WFP can describe on this Twitter thread exactly how $6B will solve world hunger, I will sell Tesla stock right now and do it,” responded Musk, adding, “But it must be open source accounting, so the public sees precisely how the money is spent.”https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-1&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1454809318356750337&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2021%2F11%2Felon-musk-challenges-un-over-child-abuse-sex-scandal.html&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

Beasley responded by clarifying that the money would be a “one-time donation to save 42 million lives during this unprecedented hunger crisis” and wouldn’t actually solve world hunger, but that the money would be subject to “transparency and open source accounting.”

Musk then asked Beasley “What happened here?” along with a link to an Express article headlined ‘Starving children ‘as young as NINE forced to give UN officials oral sex to get food’.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-2&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1454930023966773249&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2021%2F11%2Felon-musk-challenges-un-over-child-abuse-sex-scandal.html&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

The article details a report exposing how UN peacekeepers “orally and anally raped” children in the Central African Republic and how top officials at the UN’s children agency, UNICEF ignored the scandal in an apparent attempt to cover it up.

“No one has been arrested more than a year and a half after UN authorities were made aware of the sexual abuse allegations,” the report, which was published in 2015, concluded.

Report Finds UN Employs 3,300 Pedophiles, Responsible For 60,000 Rapes In Last 10 Years.

UN Troops Deployed To Haiti Raped Girls As Young As 11, And “Fathered Hundreds Of Babies”.

Most of the media reports concerning the Twitter exchange didn’t even mention Musk challenging Beasley about the child abuse sex scandal.

Gee, I wonder why?

Elon Musk Challenges UN Over Child Abuse Sex Scandal

Putin: Wokeness Is ‘Reversed Discrimination’ And A ‘Crime Against Humanity’

The President of the Russian Federation severely criticized the West for having allowed woke culture to introduce ‘reversed discrimination’ through critical race theory and the destruction of traditional family values through gender ideology.

by Pierre Boralevi

'crime against humanity' putin on 'wokeness'

Russian President Valdimir Putin has condemned the promotion of woke culture in the West, including critical race theory and gender ideology, and has described the latter as a “crime against humanity.”

Putin made the comment last Thursday while addressing dignitaries and reporters at the Valdai discussion club in Sotchi, an annual forum on Russian affairs.

The Russian president severely criticized the West for having allowed woke culture to introduce “reversed discrimination” through critical race theory and the destruction of traditional family values through gender ideology, both of which he compared to propaganda tools used by communist governments during Russia’s Soviet era. He then described exposing innocent children to non-traditional sexual values as “monstrous” and a “crime against humanity.”

The Russian leader began by criticizing critical race theory. He alluded to movements like Black Lives Matter and to cancel culture in the U.S, arguing that, far from fighting racism, these types of movements are creating a sort of ‘reversed discrimination.’

“The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity,” Putin said.

Putin described the censorship now enforced in certain places against classic works of art or literature now considered “backwards” or out of touch with current concerns over race or gender.

“The works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities because their ideas are believed to be backward,” the president alleged.

“… The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race.”

Putin also criticized the so-called diversity quotas in place within the entertainment industry which select characters based on their race or gender.

“In Hollywood, memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what color or gender should be in a movie,” he said and described these tactics as worse than the propaganda put in place by the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

The Russian president argued that the original fight against racism, which he described as “necessary” and “noble”, has now been flipped on its head by the culture warriors advocating critical race theory and cancel culture.

“Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into a ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism,” he said.

Putin pointed out that the current overemphasis on race is precisely what the civil rights fighters of the 1960s were trying to avoid, as their dream was to erase differences and divisions. He quoted Martin Luther King’s famous speech “I have a dream.”

“I specifically asked my colleagues to find the following quote from Martin Luther King: ‘I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by their character,’” he said.

Later in his speech, Putin tackled gender ideology and opined that in many western countries, “the debate over women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria.”

“Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to abolish these concepts [of men and women] altogether,” he said. “Anyone who dares to mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risks being ostracized,” he added.

The Russian leader then addressed the emergence of a “newspeak” created by this gender ideology and described as “insane” the idea of replacing words such as “mother” and “father” with “parent number one” and “parent number two” or “breastmilk” with “human milk” in an effort to avoid offending people “who are unsure about their own gender.”

Putin used strong words to condemn the attempt by some countries and government to impose this ideology even on young children. Teaching them that there are no biological sexes or allowing them to change their gender he described as “monstrous.”

He argued that, in many cases, the choice is imposed on the child by the teacher while the parents are “shut out of the process.”

“They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age capable of making a decision of this kind?” Putin asked.

“Calling a spade, a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.”

Commenting on the various agendas pushed by the promoters of woke culture and so-called culture warriors, Putin pointed out that the tactics used, and the ideas put forward, are not new; he tied them to historical Marxist propaganda.

“It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already,” he said.

“After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs, and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society,” he explained.

According to Putin, the same conservative values that were attacked by the communists in Russia at the time are now the ones being attacked by the woke mobs in the West.

“The destruction of age-old values, religion, and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that too), encouragement to inform on loved ones, all this was proclaimed ‘progress’ and was widely supported around the world back then, same as today,” he said.

The creation of a whole new language and the introduction of new concepts such as the “parent number one” and “parent number two” is also not new, he said. The Russian president observed that the same technique was used by the Soviet cultural enforcers.

“I repeat, this is nothing new. In the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak, believing that they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way,” he said.

President Putin has a long history of defending traditional family values.

In 2013, as Prime Minister, he signeda bill to outlaw the distribution of information on “non-traditional sexual concepts” to children throughout the Russian Federation. Putin defended the bill on CBS two years later in 2015, arguing: “I believe we should leave the kids in peace.”

In 2016, as President, Putin appointed a pro-life activist, mother of six and wife of a Russian Orthodox priest, as the head of the Russian Commission for the Protection of the Family and Children’s Rights.

And in 2019, during a discussion around family values which took place during a meeting on constitutional reform, Putin stated: “As for ‘parent #1’ and ‘parent #2’, I have already publicly said it and I will repeat it once more: as long as I am president, we will not have parents #1 and #2, we will have ‘papa’ and ‘mamma.’”

Putin: Wokeness is ‘Reversed Discrimination’ and a ‘Crime Against Humanity’

28,103 Deaths 2,637,525 Injuries Following COVID Shots In European Database Of Adverse Reactions

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 28,103 fatalities, and 2,637,525 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.

by Brian Shilhavy

28,103 deaths 2,637,525 injuries following covid shots in european database of adverse reactions

This database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries. The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)

So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.

The EudraVigilance database reports that through October 19, 2021 there are 28,103 deaths and 2,637,525 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:

From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,249,109) are serious injuries.

Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.

Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*

Here is the summary data through October 19, 2021.

Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2Comirnaty) from BioNTechPfizer: 13,271 deathand 1,168,872 injuries to 19/10/2021

  • 31,537   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 183 deaths
  • 33,677   Cardiac disorders incl. 1,958 deaths
  • 312        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 25 deaths
  • 16,024   Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 10 deaths
  • 1,012     Endocrine disorders incl. 5 deaths
  • 18,146   Eye disorders incl. 30 deaths
  • 100,624 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 541 deaths
  • 301,622 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 3,778 deaths
  • 1,337     Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 64 deaths
  • 11,765   Immune system disorders incl. 65 deaths
  • 43,138   Infections and infestations incl. 1,340 deaths
  • 15,919   Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 208 deaths
  • 29,450   Investigations incl. 418 deaths
  • 8,182     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 236 deaths
  • 149,865 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersincl. 163 deaths
  • 983        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 95 deaths
  • 202,217 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,430 deaths
  • 1,587     Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 46 deaths
  • 185        Product issues incl. 2 deaths
  • 21,513   Psychiatric disorders incl. 168 deaths
  • 4,061     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 212 deaths
  • 33,753   Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 50,834   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,551 deaths
  • 55,669   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 118 deaths
  • 2,332     Social circumstances incl. 18 deaths
  • 1,760     Surgical and medical procedures incl. 36 deaths
  • 31,368   Vascular disorders incl. 567 deaths

Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 7,543 deathand 341,634 injuriesto 19/10/2021

  • 6,923     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 78 deaths
  • 10,706   Cardiac disorders incl. 811 deaths
  • 137        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 4,229     Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
  • 290        Endocrine disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 5,154     Eye disorders incl. 23 deaths
  • 28,856   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 294 deaths
  • 91,974   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,764 deaths
  • 561        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 30 deaths
  • 2,909     Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths
  • 11,413   Infections and infestations incl. 596 deaths
  • 7,377     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 141 deaths
  • 6,389     Investigations incl. 132 deaths
  • 3,271     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 171 deaths
  • 42,103   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 155 deaths
  • 431        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 52 deaths
  • 58,789   Nervous system disorders incl. 758 deaths
  • 648        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 8 deaths
  • 66           Product issues incl. 2 deaths
  • 6,354     Psychiatric disorders incl. 132 deaths
  • 1,971     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 137 deaths
  • 6,174     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 6 deaths
  • 15,051   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 780 deaths
  • 18,450   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 66 deaths
  • 1,553     Social circumstances incl. 28 deaths
  • 1,187     Surgical and medical procedures incl. 75 deaths
  • 8,668     Vascular disorders incl. 285 deaths

Total reactions for the vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca5,767 deathand 1,039,136 injuries to 19/10/2021

  • 12,601   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 236 deaths
  • 18,113   Cardiac disorders incl. 659 deaths
  • 175        Congenital familial and genetic disorders incl. 7 deaths
  • 12,248   Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
  • 557        Endocrine disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 18,324   Eye disorders incl. 28 deaths
  • 100,110 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 300 deaths
  • 273,678 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,376 deaths
  • 908        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 54 deaths
  • 4,241     Immune system disorders incl. 26 deaths
  • 29,229   Infections and infestations incl. 367 deaths
  • 11,837   Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 166 deaths
  • 22,810   Investigations incl. 137 deaths
  • 12,087   Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 88 deaths
  • 155,324 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 85 deaths
  • 570        Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 20 deaths
  • 215,104 Nervous system disorders incl. 900 deaths
  • 490        Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 11 deaths
  • 177        Product issues incl. 1 death
  • 19,380   Psychiatric disorders incl. 57 deaths
  • 3,911     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 55 deaths
  • 14,363   Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 36,720   Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 691 deaths
  • 47,763   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 43 deaths
  • 1,391     Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
  • 1,273     Surgical and medical procedures incl. 24 deaths 
  • 25,752   Vascular disorders incl. 423 deaths

Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson1,522 deaths and 87,883 injuries to 19/10/2021

  • 824        Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl35 deaths
  • 1,512     Cardiac disorders incl. 141 deaths
  • 31           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
  • 865        Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
  • 54           Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
  • 1,188     Eye disorders incl. 6 deaths
  • 7,668     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 66 deaths
  • 22,981   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 408 deaths
  • 108        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 9 deaths
  • 364        Immune system disorders incl. 7 deaths
  • 2,933     Infections and infestations incl. 107 deaths
  • 816        Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 16 deaths
  • 4,359     Investigations incl. 90 deaths
  • 531        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 36 deaths
  • 13,245   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 34 deaths
  • 46           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 2 deaths
  • 17,645   Nervous system disorders incl. 165 deaths
  • 33           Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
  • 22           Product issues
  • 1,208     Psychiatric disorders incl. 13 deaths
  • 345        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 17 deaths
  • 1,544     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 6 deaths
  • 3,133     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 176 deaths
  • 2,708     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 6 deaths
  • 276        Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
  • 630        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 46 deaths
  • 2,814     Vascular disorders incl. 129 deaths
summary oct 19

*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/Cn1sTvc4lIZp/

Source: HealthImpactNews.com / Reference: AdrReports.eu; BitChute

28,103 Deaths 2,637,525 Injuries Following COVID Shots in European Database of Adverse Reactions

KILLED By Vaccines: German City Stops Tracking Covid Jab Deaths

The US government has a long history of funding and even conducting gruesome experiments on animals and people. Here’s why.

by Jon Miltimore

dr. fauci exposed for torturing hundreds of puppies for years

Dr. Anthony Fauci, already facing calls for his ouster for allegedly lying to Congress about his agency’s funding of controversial genetic research at China’s Wuhan lab, is now facing political heat on a different front.

On Friday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers sent a letter to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NAID) and President Joe Biden requesting information regarding allegations that the government funded experiments that injected puppies with parasites.

“We write with grave concerns about reports of costly, cruel, and unnecessary tax-payer funded experiments on dogs commissioned by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,” saidRepublican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, one of 24 lawmakers to sign the letter.

By Sunday, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had joined the group of lawmakers demanding action at the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

“Yes, I think everybody who heads an NIH agency right now should resign,” said PETA senior vice president Kathy Guillermo, when asked if Fauci should resign during an interview with Newsmax.

Earlier this month, it was announcedthat Francis S. Collins will end his tenure as director of NIH by the end of 2021.

A Gruesome Practice — But Not A New One

The allegations, which can be read in this report from The Hill, are both stunning and terrifying. But they are not new.

In August, FEE’s Brad Polumbo wrote about the experiments NIAID, one of 27 institutes and centers that make up NIH, had allegedly funded in recent years:

“According to a new exposé from the anti-animal-experimentation advocacy group the White Coat Waste Project, the National Institutes of Health spent $424,000 on a study involving the abuse of dogs. The NIH department that is specifically under the leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci [NIAID] funded this experiment, and it ‘commission[ed] a study in which healthy beagles are given an experimental drug and then intentionally infested with flies that carry a disease-causing parasite that affects humans.’”

The revelations from August, however, also were not new. As Polumbo pointed out, the White Coat Waste Project reported in 2016 that Fauci’s department was “using tax dollars to buy beagle puppies and strapping capsules full of infected flies to their bare skin.”

“More than 1,100 beagles, hounds, and mixed-breed dogs — even puppies — were subjected to experiments in government laboratories operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Department of Defense (DOD), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),” the 2016 report reads.

“Hundreds of the dogs were subjected to experiments involving significant pain and distress. NIH… [has] spent $5.95 million since 2011 to give dogs heart attacks. Other recent experiments include exposing dogs to anthrax, repeatedly forcing dogs to vomit, and drilling into dogs’ skulls and damaging their brains.”

A Monopoly On Violence

The revelation that US taxpayers fund gruesome experiments that intentionally infest puppies with parasites so they can be eaten by flies is likely a shock to many. The fact that it has been happening for years is probably a bigger shock.

The reality, however, is that the US government has a long history of funding and conducting gruesome experiments on animals and even on people — ”research” that would land any private individual or enterprise behind bars if it ever came to light.

The 1932 Tuskegee experiment, which allowed hundreds of African Americans to go untreated for syphilis so scientists could study its effects, is perhaps the most famous such experiment conducted by the US government — but it is just one of many. Other research conducted or funded by the government — mostly in the 1940s and 1950s — included experiments that injected subjects with hepatitis, gonorrhea, Malaria, and the Asian Flu.

News records at the time made no mention of many of the experiments, NBC reported in 2011.

Many no doubt wonder how the government was able to get away with such experiments, but the answer is not difficult to find. As the economist Murray Rothbard once observed, government bestows itself with certain privileges not afforded to others in society — particularly the ability to use violence.

“The State is that organization in society which attempts to maintain a monopoly of the use of force and violence in a given territorial area,” Rothbard wrote in Anatomy of the State.

Rothbard was referring primarily to the state’s ability to raise revenue through taxation instead of trade (or charity) like everyone else. But history is replete with examples showing the state also uses its monopoly on force to exempt itself from the usual laws that govern mere individuals and private enterprises.

Many will argue that gruesome experiments on puppies are not the same thing as gruesome experiments on humans, and I’d agree — but that’s not really the point. The point is that government consistently exempts itself from the ethics that (rightly) bind the rest of us.

Why the government violates normal ethical boundaries is also no mystery. As the Nobel Prize-winning economist F.A. Hayek once observed, it’s baked into collectivist philosophy.

“The principle that the end justifies the means is in individualist ethics regarded as the denial of all morals,” Hayek noted. “In collectivist ethics it becomes necessarily the supreme rule.”

For Fauci, like his predecessors in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, the end is the advancement of science (though the White Coat Waste project says injecting puppies is scientifically superfluous as well as unethical, since such experiments have already been done on mice and other rodent creatures). For the Nazis and Soviets and many other collectivist states throughout history, the end was the advancement of the party.

In both cases, the ethical violations are pursued for “a greater good.

Means Are Greater Than Ends

Don’t expect Dr. Fauci’s experiments to stop anytime soon. It’s likely the only reason they are gaining attention is because of the much bigger scandal brewing over Fauci’s unauthorized financial support of gain of function research, something he’s denied.

Nevertheless, NIAID’s cruel experiments offer a crucial lesson on the nature of government and an important lesson on means and ends.

“Ends, goals, aims are but the hope for things to come… not… reality… from which may safely be taken the standards for right conduct,” FEE founder Leonard Read once observed.

“Many of the most monstrous deeds in human history have been perpetrated in the name of doing good—in pursuit of some ‘noble’ goal. They illustrate the fallacy that the end justifies the means.”

Dr. Fauci could have learned a lot from Leonard Read.

KILLED by Vaccines: German City Stops Tracking Covid Jab Deaths

Hundreds Of Thousands Of Covid Vaccine Injuries BACKLOGGED And Not Yet Entered Into VAERS

On the latest episode of “Doctors and Scientists,” Dr. Brian Hooker Ph.D., P.E., was interviewed Dr. Jessica Rose, Ph.D. to discuss the failures of the vaccine injury surveillance system that was set up by the CDC and FDA over thirty years ago. Dr. Rose is an expert in bio-mathematics and molecular research.

hundreds of thousands of covid vaccine injuries backlogged and not yet entered into vaers

In January of 2021, she utilized her skills as a computational biologist and began analyzing data in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Each week, she downloaded publicly-available data sets from VAERS, comparing inputs week-to-week.

She discovered that vaccine injury reports went missing from one week to the next. Each week, the data is updated in the VAERS system. She found that some of the data is overwritten, vanished from the system. She also found that “hundreds of thousands” of covid vaccine injury reports were backlogged and did not appear in a timely manner to alert healthcare professionals to serious issues with the vaccine.

Hundreds Of Thousands Of Vaccine Injury Reports Backlogged In VAERS

In the interview, Dr. Rose discussed the systemic flaws of the VAERS system, flaws that stop the passive reporting system from working in the public’s interest, as was originally intended.

The pharmacovigilance system was set up in 1990 to detect issues with vaccines, to alert regulatory agencies and the public about serious adverse events and contraindications for specific vaccines. The data is managed by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Healthcare professionals input the data into the system, and have a narrow thirty-minute window to complete the report. In 2021, healthcare workers have been overwhelmed with vaccine injury reports and have not had the time to enter them all into the system.

Many medical concerns associated with the covid vaccine are overlooked, discarded or discounted as coincidental or normalized reactions to the vaccine.

The hundreds of thousands of adverse event reports that have been filed paint a grisly picture of medical malfeasance. These serious public health issues have yet to be addressed by any regulatory agency or judicial process.

In the past, vaccines were pulled from the market if the VAERS system documented more than fifty deaths from a single vaccine. In 2021, there have been more than 20,000 deaths recorded in just ten months. Up to 97 percent of these issues are coming from the new mRNA covid vaccines, not the rest of the vaccine supply.

Instead of pulling the deadly products from the market, the federal government has issued unlawful mandates, coercing individuals to take part in the depopulation experiment. This might be the biggest flaw with the system yet:

“The agencies that are supposed to oversee the data and alert the public to medical atrocities are the same entities trying to push a narrative forward – that vaccines are “safe and effective.”

Serious Adverse Events And Fatalities Are Occurring At Magnitudes Greater Than What Is Recorded In The VAERS System

After analyzing missing data in the VAERS system, Dr. Rose came to the conclusion that serious adverse events and fatalities following covid vaccination are much higher than what is recorded in the VAERS system.

Some issues are under-reported by a factor of thirty-one, and other, more common side effects can be under-reported by a factor of one hundred.

By September, Dr. Rose attended the FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting, bringing attention to under-reporting problem in the VAERS system.

Her research is titled, “Critical Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” and was published in Science, Public Health Policy and Law.

Her paper concludes that “hundreds of thousands” of adverse events are backlogged and waiting to be entered into the system.

“The most important thing I found in my determination is whether or not this tool — which can be a pharmacovigilance tool — is being used as such,” Dr. Rose said.

Source: NaturalNews.com / Reference: IPAKPHPI.com [pdf]

Hundreds of Thousands of Covid Vaccine Injuries BACKLOGGED and Not Yet Entered into VAERS

90% Of Germans Who Haven’t Had The Vaccine Say They Won’t Get It

90 per cent of Germans who haven’t taken the COVID-19 vaccine say they won’t get it, with only the remaining 10 per cent saying they will “probably” get it or remaining undecided.

90% of germans who haven’t had the vaccine say they won’t get it

Getty Images

A recent survey carried out by Forsa on behalf of the Ministry for Health found that 65 per cent of Germans say there is “no way” they will get the COVID vaccine over the next two months.

A further 23 per cent said they would “probably not” get the COVID jab in the near future while 2 per cent said they would “definitely not” get the jab at any point.

Out of 3000 respondents, only 10 per cent were still undecided or said they will “probably” get vaccinated in the near future.

According to the Local, the poll results emphasize how, “people who have until now chosen to remain unvaccinated against Covid are unlikely to be convinced.”

The survey contradicts Thomas Mertens from the Standing Vaccinations Committee (STIKO), who claimed that unvaccinated Germans were not “hardliners” but were merely sitting on the fence and could be convinced.

Doesn’t look like it.

Only 5 per cent of respondents said they would get the jab if hospitals were “overwhelmed with patients,” while 89 per cent said it wouldn’t change their mind even if intensive care units reached their capacity.

Emphasizing how vaccine passports actually harden people’s opposition to getting vaccinated, 27 per cent said imposing restrictions on the unvaccinated would make them even more determined not to get jabbed, while only 5 per cent said it would encourage them to get jabbed.

It’s also worth noting that the 10 per cent figure who say they will get the jab or are undecided is probably lower given that some respondents will be telling the pollsters what they think they want to hear, and are actually not planning on getting vaccinated at all.

As we highlighted back in January, German authorities announced that COVID lockdown rulebreakers would be arrested and detained in refugee camps located across the country.

Earlier this summer it was also confirmed that the unvaccinated would be deprived of basic lifestyle activities like visiting cinemas and restaurants.

The editor-in-chief of Germany’s top newspaper Bild shocked some people by apologizing for the news outlet’s fear-driven coverage of COVID, specifically to children who were told “that they were going to murder their grandma.”

90% of Germans Who Haven’t Had the Vaccine Say They Won’t Get It

Why The Carbon Hysteria Is A Huge Threat To Your Personal Freedom And Financial Wellbeing

International Man: Western countries are leading the charge in restructuring their economies around the issue of climate change. They’re committed to a comprehensive agenda to “decarbonize” their economies by 2050.

What’s your take on this?

why the carbon hysteria is a huge threat to your personal freedom and financial wellbeing

Doug Casey: To sum it up in one word, it’s insane. In two words, it’s criminally insane.

Before the Industrial Revolution, the overwhelmingly major fuel source was wood. After that, we went to coal, which was a big improvement in density of energy and economics. Then, we went to oil, another huge improvement in energy density and economics.

These things happened not because of any government mandates but simply because they made both economic and technological sense. If the market had been left alone, the world would undoubtedly be running on nuclear. Nuclear is unquestionably the safest, cheapest, and cleanest type of mass power generation.

This isn’t the time to go into the numerous reasons that’s true. But if nuclear had been left unregulated, we’d already be using small, self-contained, fifth-generation thorium reactors, generating power almost too cheap to meter. The world would already be running on truly clean green electricity.

Instead, time, capital, and brainpower have been massively diverted to so-called “ecological” power sources — mainly wind and solar — strictly for ideological reasons. The powers that be want to transition the whole world to phony green energy, like it or not.

I’m all for green energy in principle. There’s no question that solar and wind are worthwhile and effective for select applications — generally small, isolated, special locations where conventional fuel is inconvenient or too costly. The efficiency of solar has been tremendously improved over the last few decades, as has wind efficiency. But neither make any sense for mass base-load power in industrial economies.

With further technological advances, they may become more economic someday. Perhaps people will eventually put large collectors in high Earth orbit and microwave the power down to the surface. There are all kinds of sci-fi possibilities. But right now, “green” is just a nice word for “stupid,” “ideological,” or “government-sponsored.”

Doing things the green way takes power away from the markets, which is where people vote with their dollars. It instead places power in the hands of ideologues and bureaucrats.

In brief, wind and solar are being promoted at the very time, nuclear and fossil fuels are being damned. It’s the opposite of what should be happening and a very bad trend from every point of view.

Put me down as liking the birds and the bunnies as much as anyone else, but I’m anti-green. Anyway, ecofreaks don’t really care about the birds and the bunnies so much. That’s just a veneer. They actually just hate people and really want them to disappear. At a minimum, they want to control them. And the great global warming/anti-fossil-fuel hysteria is a great way to do it.

International Man: As a part of this agenda, the US, the EU, and OECD countries plan to phase out oil, gas, and other fuels, replacing them with zero or low carbon sources of energy.

What kind of disruptions could we see as the transition is made to energy sources that may not be as reliable?

Doug Casey: Lots of disruptions, many of them both huge and currently unanticipated. The US has 330 million people. Why should decisions for hundreds of millions be made by bureaucrats and political hacks in Washington, DC?

Why should they be the ones who decide what kind of power should or should not be used? That’s a question that nobody asks. People simply assume that that’s the way it should be and largely do as they’re told.

They never stop and consider that governments have set progress back immeasurably over history. The main products of government are wars, pogroms, confiscations, taxes, regulations, and the like.

Oil companies like Shell and BP are talking about getting out of the oil business. Oil companies and their employees and investors are looked down upon as the destroyers of the world. Nobody in polite society wants to admit that they’re in the oil business.

Before you drill an oil well anywhere in the world, it’s necessary to ask permission from one or more government entities. In the Western world, where the public has been captured by the notions of PC and ESG, governments are loath to issue drilling permits. Drillers don’t want to drill because costs are artificially high, and any profits will be subject to discouraging taxes.

Expect oil production to drop in the West. Throughout the ’50s, ’60s, ’70s, and ’80s, more oil was discovered than was being used. Reserves went up. But that’s no longer the case. It’s not because the oil isn’t there; it’s because it’s too politically incorrect to look for it and exploit it.

Futhermore, scientists, engineers, and investors are staying away from anything to do with fossil fuels. You can plan on both fuel shortages and much higher costs. Markets are being subverted and are becoming ever more politicized.

In addition, so-called “green technologies” aren’t really green. They just seem green on the surface. Giant windmills and solar farms rely on massive amounts of fossil fuels and metals to be manufactured and installed. They have limited lifespans, and they must be disposed of.

Not only can’t they provide mass quantities of power consistently, but they all show losses, even after-tax benefits disguise them. That destroys capital. They’re not signs of progress but monuments to waste and destruction. We’re going to have huge disruptions in the energy markets in the years to come, and since the whole world runs on energy, it’s really serious.

International Man: Broadly speaking, is the new climate change “crisis” an invitation for more government interventionin the world?

Doug Casey: Yes. It’s like inviting a vampire into your house.

For many decades, kids have been indoctrinated with ideas about counterproductive conservation and Greenism. Comic books, schoolbooks, teacher’s lectures, television — you name it — present the earth as being under attack from the forces of darkness. Mankind — especially the scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs — are shown exploiting and raping Mother Nature and her natural resources. They’re presented as evil.

Bronowski’s Ascent of Man has been subverted into a battle of good versus evil, where all the values have been turned upside down. The problem has permeated society, and it’s even worse in the education system.

St. Ignatius Loyola, who founded the Jesuits, and Vladimir Lenin, who founded the USSR, both said words to the effect of “If you can indoctrinate a child during his early years, you’ve basically set his direction of thinking for life.” They were right.

Government is always presented as noble, wise, and forward-thinking. It’s presented as the savior stepping in to stop the evil producers.

It is one of a number of false and horribly destructive memes stalking the earth today like spectres. The increasing belief in government as a magic solution to problems decreases the average person’s standard of living tremendously and creates all kinds of distortions throughout society. It’s turned the study of economics into a pseudoscience, and its incursions into science are discrediting the idea of science itself.

In fact, the two big hysterias plaguing the world right now both center on the State involving itself in science — or at least scientism. One is COVID, a relatively trivial flu blown out of all proportion. The other is AGW, anthropogenic global warming, which was relatively recently rechristened as climate change.

In my view, both will eventually be completely debunked and discredited. But if you run counter to the narrative on either of them right now, you’ll be canceled, fired, and/or ostracized.

It’s very much like what happened to Galileo when he ran counter to the prevailing wisdom of the Middle Ages. They don’t actually burn books anymore, but only because books today are mostly electronic. But they do the equivalent of that on places like Google and Twitter.

There’s an excellent chance that these people will discredit the very idea of science because they’ve wrapped themselves in the veil of science. Or, more precisely, what’s become known as “The Science.” They’re creating something much more serious than just another economic disaster.

International Man: This trend seems to be growing in momentum.

For example, Google Flights now prominently displays the carbon emissions of each flight it lists.

Is that a small first step toward charging individuals for the carbon they emit?

Doug Casey: I can assure you that I pay no attention whatsoever to the amount of carbon that I may be burning on a plane or anywhere else. It’s part of a psychological war the Left is waging, using guilt and shame as weapons. It’s another indication of the lockstep, the groupthink, that people are subjected to today.

Life on this planet is based on carbon. The element itself is indestructible and essential, but it’s been transformed into a deadly enemy in the mind of the public. But if you deny that it’s destroying the earth, then you’re committing heresy. It’s like denying the existence of God in the Middle Ages. Hating carbon and worshipping “The Ecology” have become tenets of a secular religion.

A new carbon tax will be implemented. It’s definitely in the cards. Most people will stupidly roll over and say, “Yes, this is for the good of the planet. It’s a tax we should all pay.”

Of course, governments and the powers that be always want more resources directed towards themselves. In a time when governments are bankrupt and can only generate more money for themselves by printing it, it’s an absolute certainty that the next tax will have a patina of righteousness. A carbon tax on individuals, as well as companies, checks all the boxes.

International Man: Will carbon credits become a new government-created “commodity” that corporations and individuals will be forced to purchase?

Doug Casey: Without question, it’s a clever way to turn a tax into something that looks like an asset, an investment.

Look, this is all about politics and money, but disguised as a religious movement, which is quite clever. There’s no question that Greenism is being promoted as a new religion.

Christianity is a dead duck in Europe, and it’s dying in North America. But people need some type of religion, a replacement for Christianity, to hold on to.

People will be encouraged to treat their taxes as tithes to wash away their sins against Mother Nature — much the way they tithed the church to expunge their sins in the Middle Ages. It’s an exact analogy. They’ll buy “carbon credits” as an analog for building cathedrals and monasteries.

As an economist, as well as someone who reads a lot of science, I think it’s ridiculous and destructive. The whole anti-carbon, carbon sequestration, and Greenism thing is a political hysteria promoted by people who like to control other people. I’m completely opposed to carbon credits or carbon taxes from that point of view.

Warning! The CO2 Monitoring Credit Card Will Cut You Off At Your Carbon Max.

But when I put on my speculator’s hat, I’m all for it. There are companies being formed to cleverly capitalize on all this destructive nonsense. It’s still very early days, and the public will pile into the space with a combination of religious fervor and fin de sièclegreed. I expect a massive bubble in the space. I’m all for bubbles — if I can buy in early.

A speculator is a cynic, not a philanthropist — although I hasten to add that most philanthropists are hypocrites. It’s a pity that the vast majority of people have been totally brainwashed by Greenism, and carbon stocks are a great way to turn the lemon into lemonade.

Editor’s Note: We’ve seen governments institute the strictest controls on people and businesses in history. It’s been a swift elimination of individual freedoms.

But this is just the beginning…

Most people don’t realize the terrible things that could come next, including negative interest rates, the abolition of cash, and much more.

If you want to know how to survive what the central bankers and the Deep State have planned, then you need to see this newly released report from legendary investor Doug Casey and his team.

Why the Carbon Hysteria is a Huge Threat to Your Personal Freedom and Financial Wellbeing

WHEN PEOPLE WERE THINNER

Look at this picture. It was taken in the 50s or 60s. I am not sure. But there are a few things to notice in it. People were far thinner back then, and women dressed much more modestly. Obesity rates among adults in the US in 1950 was 10 percent. In 2020, it was 42.4 percent of adults. It has increased 26 percent just since 2008. Learning to eat in moderation is greatly needed in this country. Up to 80 percent of people dying from Covid are obese. Most obese people have comorbidities.

What has changed since the 50s and 60s? Fast food is abundant now and so is processed food. Many women are no longer cooking for their families. Sadly, many families are broken these days. The mothers aren’t home during the days, or the parents are divorced. All of this has contributed to the obesity we are seeing in our country.

People eat far more sugar now than they did then. Seed oils are a huge part of it too. People used to eat butter and lard. Now, they eat corn oil, sunflower, safflower, canola, peanut, and grapeseed oil. None of these are healthy. It’s far better to eat extra virgin olive oil, ghee, tallow, lard, coconut oil, avocado oil, and butter. All restaurants except for the few health conscious ones and fast food joints use junky oils.

Learning to eat in moderation is crucial for not becoming obese. Many will try to put blame on their obesity on many things except for their lack of self-control. Few were obese many years ago in America. People must become responsible for how much they eat and what they eat, and stop blaming it on something outside of their control. Besides needing to eat healthy, we need to exercise. We weren’t created to sit around all day. These lock downs have been horrible on the health of Americans! Instead of teaching people to eat healthy, get sunshine and exercise, they tell people to mask up, social distance, slather themselves with toxic chemicals, and inject themselves with toxic ingredients with no long-term studies available.

Did you notice how all of the women in the picture above are either dressed in dresses or in bathing suits which are far more modest than the ones women wear today? I wouldn’t call the bathing suits exactly modest, but they are far more modest then than they are now. I would be thankful if women went back to wearing those rather than the thong bikinis in which they are practically naked. Even so, we must, as believers in Jesus Christ, hold our standards to God’s Word, not what past generations did or didn’t do. The dresses in the picture are definitely modest. The bathing suits not so much.

How does a woman who wants to lose weight lose the weight? Check out intermittent fasting. Get rid of all of the junk food in your home. Eat whole, healthy food. Learn to cook from scratch. Be busy at home. Take long walks every day if you can. Eat in moderation. Remind yourself that you can do ALL things through Christ who strengthens you. You are dead and freed from sin! Read Romans 6 and 8 over and over again until you believe it. If you are a believer in Jesus Christ, a fruit of the Spirit is self-control. Teach your children self-control. This is a gift that you give them.

Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand.
Philippians 4:5

When People Were Thinner