Video of the last meetings takeover
1 hour 23 minutes, a Brave Latino man tells BLM and Antifa the truth, that there is no racism in Fairfield. He’s relentlessly heckled and interrupted, disrespected, and jeered. He also tells the adults in the audience that he’s in his twenties, and less than half their age, and he’s more mature than them. Such courage is rarely seen.
2 hrs 6 minutes, Batman shows up. Batman and Superman were created by Jews, the guy in the uniform was likely Jewish. He had the attitude of Antifa.
Dear Mayor Moy, Councilman Sandhu, Vice-Mayor Bertani, Councilwoman Williams, Councilman Carr, Councilwoman Panduro, and Councilman Tonneson,
I regret I wasn’t able to attend the last council meeting as I was speaking at a meeting in Sacramento, but I watched every single speaker, which took over three hours. I am sorry you were subjected to the psychological terrorism of a mob, a frequent occurrence in cities across America. We are supposed to believe that these are organic, and that this is popular outrage of the community at an instance of “Police brutality,” but that is deceptive. This happened in the Watts Riots, after Rodney King, during the George Floyd riots, The Michael Brown riots, the Trayvon Martin riots, and many other times. What we have happening is non-profits and non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) have been organizing mobs and community discord along racial lines for well over a century. NGO’s include the NAACP, ADL, ACLU, BLM, Black Panthers, and thousands of smaller ones who get billions of dollars of funding to push their agendas. They are closely supported by huge corporations and by the media, especially newspapers and social media. There are millions of Americans deceived by social media. We must earnestly strive to get every American off social media. These social media companies are lying snakes, which is why they have no customer service numbers. They are not here to serve the community, they are here to divide, to spy on, and to stir up community unrest. All of this and much more is on my website, messanonews.com. We also have to deal with members of the community who are under invisible leadership, like members of college fraternities, fraternities like the Moose, Elk, Masons, and a number of others. These community members, sometimes they are elected leaders, are part of an invisible network, that coordinates to secretly rule America from the shadows.
God hates them, as they stir up social unrest on purpose. They are like vultures, trying to find community controversial issues and they seek to inflame them, as they have done with the recent school police incident in Fairfield. It’s not organic that this video just went nationwide, that’s deliberate. Social media bans millions of posters and posts, and then they sensationalize ideas they want everyone to see while they hide. We are dealing with an invisible government, which uses algorithms, millions of bots, agents, and shadow bans to control the minds of billions of humans. It’s hard to fight an invisible enemy.
I did want to emphasize that I greatly commend Mayor Moy for your courageous opposition to BLM (Also for your brave opposition to the scam of California Forever), which is nothing but an organized group of terror which ignores the crime problems in the Black community and tries to pretend America’s racism and police brutality are far bigger problems than they really are. I am disappointed in the lack of accountability in the Fairfield Police department and every police department in America which all fail miserably to report rapes, murders, and violent crimes by the races of the perpetrators. A careful study of the statistics reveals that Black men make up 6% of the population and are responsible for 50-70% of all violent crimes, murders, and rapes. We also know that a Black man is 18 times more likely to shoot a police officer than to be shot by one, we know that 90% of the violent deaths in the Black community are from other Blacks. We know that the interracial violent crime rate is 90% Black on White and 10% White on Black, despite America being 58% White and 13% Black. We know the police are more likely to shoot a White person than a Black person. We know that 73% of school shootings in America are from non-Whites. Many talk about Black men receiving harsher sentences for the same crimes compared to White men. But this fails to consider that the rates of recidivism, or repeated criminal behavior, are far higher in the Black community than in the White community. We also aren’t told the root problems, which largely didn’t exist in 1940. 75% of Black children are born out of wedlock, compared to 10% in 1940, and 75% of Black boys are functionally illiterate. Illegitimacy, or children born out of marriages, and illiteracy are the two factors that predict criminality the most. Many of the speakers at the last meeting talked about desiring accountability, yes, let’s have accountability. Let’s start reporting crime by race. It’s not fair to anyone to hide these statistics, because it’s impossible to fix problems that are hidden from the people. There are millions of upstanding, wise, and virtuous people in the Black community, and in all communities, they all deserve the objective truth. They don’t deserve to be lied to by hiding crime statistics. It’s better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie.
Also, abortion is the largest killer in the Black community, and has done far worse damage in the 53 years of abortion in America than even the translantic slave trade, with abortion having killed 20 million Blacks while the translantic slave trade killed 4 million. None of the speakers referenced this. We also never heard the word loxism at the meeting, though we saw a lot of it. Loxism is the hatred of White people, and there is a reason why not one White person with a controversial opinion got up to speak at the meeting, because as one Latino gentleman noted at the one hour and 23 minute mark, there was a lot of hostility in the air, and that isn’t good. What was appalling is that he was repeatedly interrupted and attacked even though he was Latino. And he was correct, Fairfield doesn’t have a problem with police and racism. He had courage, which is more than can be said of any other speaker.
Below, is a post that I did some time ago, addressing rules for speakers that are popping up in city councils across America. Councils should be able to protect the speaking rights of ALL speakers, ESPECIALLY those with unpopular opinions. What took place Tuesday was a dangerous farce of a meeting, where community organizers used intimidation to encourage opinions they liked and to discourage opinions they didn’t like. Now, I listened to all 180 minutes. We were told “Humans are born with 2 ears and one mouth so they can listen twice as much as they speak.”
Well, I intend to speak for three minutes at the next meeting, which means I listened for not double the time that I’ll speak, but sixty times, the amount of time that I’ll speak. I also read every single Facebook comment on the Fairfield PD Facebook page, though I’ve been banned on Facebook for over ten years, and that’s likely another hour of listening at least. So, I ask the Fairfield city council protects my right to speak, WITHOUT INTERRUPTION, for three minutes, just like every other speaker was allowed to speak without interruption except the brave Latino gentleman, who was interrupted and disrespected multiple times.
Thank you for your attention to this. There are thousands of Americans who will watch this meeting. Please do not fear the mob. Every human will one day die; but God never does. We ought to fear God and not any human. One man or woman with God is a majority. It was perfectly shameful the way Mayor Moy was spoken to, and how the audience attempted to terrorize any dissenting opinions into silence.
To the men on the council, your manhood is defined by courage. If you go quiet and fail to stand up and tell the truth in controversial situations, you are a coward, you are not a man. The entire nation is looking for brave leaders who are not afraid to tell the truth, especially in trying situations. No one respects a coward, and a coward has to look in the mirror every morning and know, he’s a coward.
“I have always been of the opinion that unpopularity earned by doing what is right, is not unpopularity at all, but glory.”
Cato
Joshua 1:9
“Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest.”
Thank you for your attention to this and the following letter, may God keep and bless you all,
Sincerely,
Ryan Messano
Thousands of city councils around America have policies that restrict speech and target speakers.
Policies such as saying speech cannot “disrupt the meeting,” limiting speakers to 1-2 minutes, mandating that speakers must provide their address, stating that speakers must, even on the “items not on the agenda,” portion of the speaking, speak on matters “within the jurisdiction of the city,” all seek to limit and suppress speakers.
The First Amendment was to empower virtuous and wise citizens to get up and state unpopular truths about a corrupt government, and sometimes, about corrupt citizens too. It was designed to protect the individual from the mob, as this is how Socrates and Jesus were killed, by unruly mobs who were stirred up by shadow governments, like the one we have now.
Yet, these restrictions on speech rarely restrict the language that is restricted by necessary inference by the Constitution, and that is racial slurs, profanity, and pornography, which are all three commonly used in media and in social media across America.
Here is the city of Gillette, Wyoming’s citizen comment regulations, and a letter I wrote to them on it.
This is extremely important because these same restrictions on allowable speech and a failure to restrict unprotected speech are in thousands of city councils in America, likely 80% of the 19,500 American cities have these same issues. There J’s a good chance these same problems are in the city council meetings in your city council meetings and school board meetings of the city you live in or close to.
City Council Meeting Safety and Public Meeting Rules, Gillette, Wyoming
https://www.gillettewy.gov/
The purpose of these rules is to allow Council Meetings open to all viewpoints germane to City government business. The rules provide a safe environment for the public, Council, and City staff while preserving order, decorum and minimizing any potential disruption.
Speakers
Persons seeking to be recognized for public comment must, without exception:
State their name
State their physical address
If speaking on behalf of an organization, identify their position or affiliation
The public comment period will be limited to ten (10) minutes total.
Speakers must remain behind the podium/lectern.
Speakers shall refrain from making comments of a personal nature that reflect upon the character of a Councilperson, the Mayor, City staff, or another speaker. Personal criticism, ridicule, intimidating behavior, and name calling is forbidden.
Speakers shall refrain from the use of indecent or obscene language, “fighting words” or other language which is disruptive to the orderly discussion at the meeting.
Audience Members
Audience members will refrain from distracting side conversations or speaking out when another person is talking.
Audience members will refrain from shouting, booing, or other similar unruly behavior that impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of the meeting.
Enforcement of Meeting Rules
The Governing Body will request that a person violating any Meeting Rules cease the violation.
Failure to comply with the Governing Body’s warning may result in removal from the Council Chambers, criminal prosecution pursuant to Gillette City Code Section 14-5, recess of the meeting, or any remedy available under Wyoming law.
My response:
Dear Mayor and Council,
I respectfully disagree with the public comment policy. This is a disturbing trend taking place in thousands of cities across America, where elected officials are taking upon themselves the jobs the Constitution gave no elected official: regulating citizens’ speech with unconstitutional restrictions.
The First Amendment is clear: Citizens have the right to state their opinions. Speakers are given a specific time to address matters not on the agenda. That is great; otherwise, every word uttered at a city council meeting would be dictated by the business interests of the city, which would silence the ordinary citizen. Effectively, the standard policy of limiting comments to items on the agenda silences a large part of the population, as not all citizens have the wealth and power to determine what is put on the agenda.
The First Amendment was designed for a virtuous and wise people, as anyone who studies American history easily realizes, but in an age of unprecedented electronic distractions and mass propaganda, the study and comprehension of history in America is at an all-time low. So, since the First Amendment was only for virtuous and wise people, we know that it wasn’t designed for profanity, obscenity, vulgarity, and pornography, which the First Amendment does not protect. And yet, the Supreme Court of this nation doesn’t recognize this obvious fact, so it’s not hard to see why millions in America don’t either.
This clause is unconstitutional.
“ Speakers shall refrain from making comments of a personal nature that reflect upon the character of a Councilperson, the Mayor, City staff, or another speaker. Personal criticism, ridicule, intimidating behavior, and name-calling are forbidden.”
Citizens are free to criticize whatever they please. If what a citizen says is a lie, then a slander lawsuit can be filed against them. But, this clause makes it almost impossible to criticize an elected official for nearly anything, including if they commit a crime.
This clause can effectively be used to silence any opinion a member of the council does not like: “Personal criticism, ridicule, intimidating behavior.”
Name-calling is a subjective term. If someone were to call a city council member corrupt, ignorant, selfish, arrogant, proud, or any other number of names, I can’t see how the Constitution forbids that. For elected leaders who cannot handle criticism, perhaps elected office isn’t for you. An elected official should be able to take all criticism, and they should strive to possess the truth that can stand against the fiercest criticism.
Also, while profanity and racial slurs should indeed be banned, banning “language that is disruptive to the meeting” is far too ambiguous. If Jesus came to your meeting and the Pharisees were in the audience, you’d silence Jesus because the audience didn’t like the truths he was telling.
The design of the First Amendment was to allow every citizen to state their opinion. It’s designed for speech that people hate to hear. It’s not intended to protect ideas people love to hear. Stalin and Mao both protected speech they liked to hear. The audience’s response is their responsibility. Your rules allow mobs to attend your council meetings and silence citizens with whom they disagree. You will claim the speaker is “disruptive” and remove the speaker rather than removing the disruptive and violent mob, which is a much more challenging task. Still, it’s the right course of action to prevent another Socrates or Jesus from being put to death.
Also, asking speakers for their address can lead to problems, as it invites government retribution against citizens who disagree with policies. Citizens should be able to state their opinion and not have to worry about the police showing up to their home, or that the government will inform violent mobs about them, which will lead to the horror of communist Russia and China where 100 million were put to death by the Government and violent mobs.
Lastly, ten minutes for public comment is way too short. Speakers should be given 3-5 minutes, and they shouldn’t be interrupted by the council or audience unless they violate the rules above by using profanity or racial slurs.
I hope you update your rules to be in accord with the letter and spirit of the First Amendment. Thousands of other cities in America are not living up to the standards of the First Amendment, but what is popular is not always right, and what is right is not always popular.
Thank you for your attention to this.
I have a website with over 1,000 books dealing with free speech and many other issues, which you may enjoy. Most are not available in schools, colleges, libraries, or even on Amazon.
http://Messanonews.com
I’d like to end with a quote from Michael Crichton, the author of Jurrasic Park.
“ If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything. You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree.”
I wish you and Gillette all the best,
Sincerely yours,
Ryan Messano
“In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Regard not the particular sect or denomination of the candidate — look at his character. It is alleged by men of loose principles, or defective views of the subject, that religion and morality are not necessary or important qualifications for political stations. But the scriptures teach a different doctrine. They direct that rulers should be men who rule in the fear of God, men of truth, hating covetousness. It is to the neglect of this rule that we must ascribe the multiplied frauds, breaches of trust, speculations and embezzlements of public property which astonish even ourselves; which tarnish the character of our country and which disgrace our government. When a citizen gives his vote to a man of known immorality, he abuses his civic responsibility; he not only sacrifices his own responsibility; he sacrifices not only his own interest, but that of his neighbor; he betrays the interest of his country.”
Noah Webster
http://liberty1.org/virtue.htm
