On Jan. 10, 1963, Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr. of Florida read a list of 45 Communist goals into the Congressional Record. The list was reported in researcher Cleon Skousen’s book “The Naked Communist” (1958).
These principles are worth revisiting today, 60 years later, to see how much our so-called “liberal” elite has accomplished and where they are headed.
Clearly, as the links below the article prove, Communism is a satanic cult based on Jewish Cabalism. Its aim is to enslave mankind and dedicate it to Satan.
Kerry is worth $300 million – proof that Communism is the same as Fascism – monopoly capitalism fronted by the State, becoming a political and cultural monopoly.
2. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
3. Do away with loyalty oaths.
4. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
5. Capture one or both of the political parties in the U.S.
6. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
7. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
8. Gain control of all student newspapers.
9. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations that are under Communist attack.
10. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
11. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.
12. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. Control art critics and directors of art museums. ” Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
13. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
14. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV. [Note: This is the Gramscian agenda of the “long march through the institutions” spelled out explicitly: gradual takeover of the “means of communication” and then using those vehicles to debauch the culture and weaken the will of the individual to resist.]
15. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural and healthy.”
16. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.” [Note: This has been largely accomplished through the communist infiltration of the National Council of Churches, Conservative and Reform Judaism, and the Catholic seminaries.]
17. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state”
18. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
19. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
20. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of “the big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over. [See the Jew Howard Zinn, left, a Communist Party member, who presented US history as a litany of exploitation of the poor by the rich.]
21. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture – education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
22. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
23. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.
25. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. [Note: Done! The sovereign family is the single most powerful obstacle to authoritarian control.]
26. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
27. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a “united force” to solve economic, political or social problems. [Note: This describes the dialectical fostering of group consciousness and conflict, which furthers the interests of authoritarianism.]
28. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
29. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
30. Repeal the Connally Reservation so the U.S. cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.
To all American Men and women who support the Constitution and First Amendment.
What happens in California frequently spreads to the rest of America. Last Tuesday, May 23rd, when I was called to speak at the Sacramento City Council meeting, a group of 10-15 likely paid activists, nearly all under 30, got up and blocked the speaker’s podium with banners.
These same activists had been harassing me for the past four meetings, interrupting when I was talking, challenging me to fight outside, and threatening violence. Of course, if you fight them, you’ll be banned from City Council Meetings for disrupting the peace, so that’s a no-win situation. They constantly yell out and slander me with chants of ‘Nazi,’ ‘White Supremacist,’ ‘Racist,’ and the rest of the left’s Cultural Marxist Lexicon. The Mayor and City Council are smart and know they cannot stop my speaking, so they coordinate with their ‘community organizers,’ often paid with our tax dollars, to do their dirty work for them. The young people who do come up there are some of the biggest racists in Sacramento, who claim they support black and brown people’s rights while at the same time viciously attacking any White person who disagrees with them. No one should be coming to City Council meetings who cannot reasonably listen to other people’s opinions. No one in America has the right to police other people’s speech, as that is a right given to us by our Creator, not by any vote, any politician, and certainly not by young people who often use drugs, uphold debauched sexual practices, and who have the historical comprehension of a flea. The Constitution was created for a virtuous and wise people, in other words, not for these young, corrupt, and foolish types, and this may be why they attack anyone telling the truth so savagely because they understand in a true Republic with virtuous and wise citizens, they wouldn’t fit in very well.
They even attacked some of the young men who attended with us.
It’s appalling that the Mayor and City Council allow and encourage this mobocracy to continue at City Hall.
Citizens of Sacramento, California, and America, will you let these tyrants attack the First Amendment Rights of all Americans like this? If they can take my First Amendment rights, and you may disagree with me, and that’s fine, the day is soon coming when they come for your First Amendment Rights as well. United we stand, divided we fall. A house divided against itself cannot stand.
If you attend the meeting to speak, please refrain from violence. The activists from the other side are vulgar, profane, ahistorical, easily angered, have little self-control, and sadly, are primarily young, meaning they likely never had loving families in their youths and have been cruelly indoctrinated by the devious and devilish media and school system. Since hurt people hurt people, we must treat them gently and with care, but we must firmly insist on our rights given to us by God as well. Just because they have been mistreated and deceived does not justify their abuse of others. We do not stand for Nazism or any authoritarian control at all. We stand for the rights of all wise and virtuous men on earth, Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, and all races. We believe all men were endowed with inalienable rights, and among these rights is the right to speak their opinion on what is wrong in our society and who is responsible. We stand for virtue and wisdom. I strongly denounce all vulgarity, profanity, racial slurs, and violence. I support no authoritarian and tyrannical form of government.
For those who cannot come, please call into the meeting. Here is the phone number. The meeting begins at 5:00 in the evening on Tuesday. Speaking normally doesn’t start until 7-9 at night PDT. Please call in; you will have two minutes to speak. Prayerfully there will be hundreds of callers to speak out against a mobocracy.
You will have 2 minutes to speak. It would be good to address the First Amendment and free speech and the flurry of primarily young people, deceived, who will be coming to lecture Sacramento on how ‘hate’ should not be allowed. They do not understand that truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth. Please join me in informing the Mayor, the City Council, and some deluded youth and older deceived types that no one gets to regulate the Free Speech rights of their fellow men, which were given by God, not man.
The following are the ideas that men from history, including modern men with dubious wisdom and virtue. But all are agreed, free expression is a must for a healthy nation.
And following them are ideas on Courage, for courage is the first virtue; without courage, none of the other virtues are possible.
Courage is having the attitude of confronting anything recognized to be dangerous, difficult, or painful rather than withdrawing from it. And facing this issue is difficult and dangerous. Many people at City Hall are openly profane, violent, aggressive, and have little self-control. To calmly and firmly face them and demand your rights in the face of their bullying and intimidation requires self-control and courage. Courage is further required because the Mayor and City Council, the television, radio, and newspapers, are all owned by the same people actively trying to suppress our free speech rights. So, whatever happens, if you speak up for free speech, the media will likely attack you as a ‘Nazi,’ a ‘Bigot,’ a ‘Fascist,’ a ‘racist,’ a ‘White Supremacist,’ and a ‘hater.’ It’s very hard to stand up against such fierce and malicious hatred, lies, and aggression. It’s even harder to do so calmly without responding with violence. Yet, that’s what love and truth can accomplish.
“The greatest kindness one can render to any man consists in leading him from error to truth.”
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum–even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.
Noam Chomsky — ‘If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.’
Quotes on Courage
“Because the tyranny of opinion is such as to make eccentricity a reproach, it is desirable, in order to break through that tyranny, that people should be eccentric. Eccentricity has always abounded when and where strength of character has abounded; and the amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor, and moral courage it contained.”
John Stuart Mill
“Courage is doing what you are afraid to do. There can be no courage unless you are scared.”
“No man can be brave who considers pain the greatest evil of life.”
“Courage in danger is half the battle.”
“Courage is not a virtue or value among other personal values like love or fidelity. It is the foundation that underlies and gives reality to all other virtues and personal values. Without courage our love pales into mere dependency. Without courage our fidelity becomes conformism.”
“O friends, be men, and let your hearts be strong,And let no warrior in the heat of fight what may bring him shame in others’ eyes; For more of those who shrink from shame are safeThan fall in battle, while with those who fleeIs neither glory nor reprieve from death.”
“He has not learned the lesson of life who does not every day surmount a fear.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson
The righteous are bold as a lion; the wicked flee when no man pursues
“Man is loved mainly because of two virtues: courage first, loyalty second.”
“Courage consists not in hazarding without fear, but being resolutely minded in a just cause.”
“God will not have his work made manifest by cowards.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson
“Courage charms us, because it indicates that a man loves an idea better than all things in the world, that he is thinking neither of his bed, nor his dinner, nor his money, but will venture all to put in act the invisible thought of his mind.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson
“The conscience of every man recognizes courage as the foundation of manliness, and manliness as the perfection of human character.”
“Fortitude is the guard and support of the other virtues.”
“A man without courage is to me the most despicable thing under the sun, a travesty on the whole scheme of creation.”
In the past few weeks, Northern California has been flooded with propaganda from radio, television, newspapers, and social media, stating that the Sacramento City Council meetings have a problem with White Supremacists and Nazis. This, of course, is expected because, as we know, television, radio, newspapers, and social media are all owned by the exact same group of people. To find out who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. The question naturally comes to mind, why are we allowed to criticize Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, but we are not allowed to criticize Judaism? When the American Founders gave us the First Amendment, no religion was exempt from criticism. It is a complete and utter lie to equate legitimate criticism of groups of Jews with the Holocaust and wanting to genocide all Jews. Regardless of whether people agree with me, I am created by God; my right to speak and my First Amendment rights do not come from politicians, nor do not come from any of the 330 million other Americans either. They come from God, and they are to be violated by no man.
It needs to be understood by all concerned that if a single finger is laid upon me or those who come with me to support free speech, the direct liability for this will be laid squarely on the shoulders of the media outlets, the individuals, and the politicians who insisted on spreading malicious lies. I am not a Nazi, Racist, sexist, or a White Supremacist, nor am I any of the other malicious slanders and libels the lying left throws at me. I believe in a God who created all human beings, who loves all human beings, and who has a divine order that applies to all human beings. Human nature never changes, and God believes all humans deserve justice. Justice is what we deserve for our choices, not for factors that happened long before we were born.
These malevolent attempts to incite widespread hatred for those criticizing the existing power structure are evil and wicked. They have been going on for thousands of years.
The entire reason why we have the First Amendment is that our Founders recognized that people in power will commonly whip up mobs to kill figures who tell the truth about them. This happened with Socrates and with Jesus, and the Founders wanted to ensure that anyone who told the truth was not killed again by mobs. Here we are in 2023, and we are facing the same scenario. The power elite are whipping up mobs, especially the youth and women who do not understand history very well, and this massive hatred is now being focused on me, with the goal of leading to violence and or death for me and those associated with me.
Let us be very clear; I have never been associated with the Proud Boys, Nazis, or any White Supremacy group. I disavow the Roman salute thrown up by an individual who came to the last meeting, who I had never met before, and who told me he was supporting free speech. I do not support the death of a single innocent person, whether Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Jewish, White, Black, Asian, or Latino. These egregious lies being spread about me that I support the death of millions of people, that I support genocide, and other gross misrepresentations, are very divisive and very dangerous, and those who are telling these lies are going to be responsible for any rioting or violence that happens at the next City Council meeting.
What is especially disturbing about this is we have elected politicians, such as Mayor Steinberg and Councilwoman Kaplan, who both happen to be Jewish, who are actively inciting violence by lying and maliciously spreading propaganda about me. The entire City Council, to varying degrees, has actively interrupted me; this includes the Mayor, Councilman Jennings, and Councilman Loloee, and it includes many of the council members actively sitting and turning their backs when I am speaking. The level of disrespect this shows is outrageous. You do not need to agree with what I am saying, but the least you can do is sit and listen. We are not like little children who throw temper tantrums when someone says something they don’t like. The City Council meetings are not gigantic safe spaces for your indoctrination.
But it gets worse. There are radical activist groups, including the Sacramento Radicals Education Twitter group, with about 2600 followers, who send activists to the City Council meetings. We do not know the coordination between politicians and these groups, but it appears likely. The last meeting seems to have been coordinated. Activists showed up with banners, and the Sacramento Bee had the most representatives it ever had at a council meeting that I attended. It was almost as if, on cue, the activists knew to get up in front of the speaker’s podium, and the mayor escaped from the back door. What should’ve happened was the mayor should have had the protesters removed from the room, and I should have been given my time to speak. What is particularly outrageous is not a single member of the City Council, Mayor, or any members of the audience defended my right to speak. It is groupthink. Everyone wants to go along with everyone else; no one wants to think for themselves individually. Only a dead fish goes with the flow.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
This is the first amendment, which means no restrictions on speech. Including hate speech. The lawyers on the council ought to know that in 2017, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, 8-0, that there are no exceptions for hate speech in the First Amendment. Speech may not be banned on the grounds that it may offend.
And, the Constitution and First Amendment were designed for a wise and virtuous people, two words I’ve never heard the Mayor or any member of the City Council use, and I’m sorry to say, they do not appear to be virtues you aspire to.
This is a clash between ideas and virtue and feelings and corruption.
Without virtue, we cannot have liberty, and since you do not cherish virtue, you are savagely attacking my liberty.
But I digress, back to the activists. We do not know if these activists are paid, but we have to wonder what their motives are. Some say they are homeless, and that is understandable. But if they are up there for homelessness, then why have they appointed themselves to police speech? They do not seem to realize that no one in America, a citizen or a politician, has ever been appointed to be speech police. We do not need your opinions on who can say what. If you disagree with something I say or someone else says, you can use your time at the podium to state why you disagree. What you cannot do is actively interrupt what I am saying and stand up and prevent me from speaking.
I’m going to paraphrase Noam Chomsky, who is a Jew,
“Mao was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech.”
What we are seeing very clearly in front of our eyes is the Sacramento Mayor, and City Council are tyrants who think they get to dictate what their citizens can and cannot say. They also will actively support violent and out-of-control mobs who try to silence speakers who disagree with the mayor and City Council members.
What is tyranny? According to Webster’s 1828 Dictionary, it is, “Arbitrary or despotic exercise of power; the exercise of power over subjects and others with a rigor not authorized by law or justice, or not requisite for the purposes of government. Hence tyranny is often synonymous with cruelty and oppression.” That is precisely what is happening; the Sacramento City Council is arbitrarily creating rules and laws on speech that they are not authorized to create by the Constitution.
Ms. Kaplan, in a recent television interview, almost tacitly encourages the violence, saying that the mother in her understood and approved of what this mob was doing. The mayor recently stated, “to young people who may have seen what happened on the news last Tuesday night…get involved and get engaged. You matter.”
Young people, Mayor? Why are you calling for young people to get involved? Young people 40 and under are the most ignorant and corrupt generation in the entire history of America. Of course, in your world, that’s not true because these young ones have been brainwashed more than anyone before, and you need that for your power. Why aren’t you calling for older, wiser people to speak, people who have self-control? Our brains are not even fully formed until age 25; why are you calling for people whose brains are not even fully developed to come to City Hall, Mayor? That’s very irresponsible of you. What this is going to lead to is more emotional outbursts from people who are easily manipulated.
Now, let us give a little background. The media, as usual, is leaving out a lot of the truths that bear on this matter.
I began speaking at the Sacramento City Hall about a month ago; I intended to shine a light on the problems of who is funding the vast majority of the media and these politicians. Of course, as we know and as was aforementioned, to find out who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. Immediately, massive opposition began, and it is only getting bigger and bigger the more consistently I do this. You would think, since I only have two minutes up there to speak, people would listen and go on their way. But no, the politicians have interrupted, and mobs have nearly attacked me.
Let us also not forget these politicians up there are presiding over possibly the worst and most corrupt period in Sacramento’s history. As much as they dislike me, I have zero responsibility for the state of Sacramento today, the homelessness, the crime, the unemployment, and the terrible state of the schools. What is so interesting is that at last Tuesday’s meeting, many of the people attending were homeless or homeless activists, and they had no problem; instead of blaming the mayor and city council for the obvious responsibility they have for the homelessness problems, they turned their guns on me. It’s the simple divide and conquer strategy. To be clear, I sympathize with people experiencing homelessness, and I guarantee if I were mayor of Sacramento, there would be practically no homelessness in three years. Once this corrupt government is removed from not only Sacramento, not only California, not only America but from all over the world, people will once again be able to live stable lives and have equal opportunity, not equal outcomes.
But I digress. Let us return to the history of the past few weeks of my speaking at city council meetings. From the first time I spoke, there were three young female activists, likely all under the age of 25, who interrupted me. They are likely members of the Sacramento Radicals education, a near communist group. I have tried to speak with them, but they will not talk, just as I have tried to speak, calling members of the City Council and sending them emails, and they all refuse to respond. So they will talk about me behind my back, but they will never have a conversation face-to-face. Now, consider I have never interrupted the City Council when it is their turn to talk, I have never interrupted one of these radical speakers when it is their turn to talk, but the City Council and the radical speakers insist on interrupting me every single time that I get up there to speak. They justify this by lying about me and saying I’m a Nazi, a hater, a racist, and the rest of their cultural Marxist lexicon. The young people in there, under 30, who continually shout and screech the word Nazi, have never read three history books outside of school on World War II and their entire lives. No wise person would ever rely on their judgment on anything about World War II. This is why the mayor wants young people to come to City Hall because he knows they are the easiest for social media and the newspapers, television, and radio to brainwash.
As I began speaking the first time, the mayor, of course, interrupted me, and I said this is a game you Jews play, which is actually very accurate; now, if he was a Christian, a Hindu, a Buddhist, or a Muslim, I could’ve easily said that, but for some reason, because he happens to be a Jew, you’re not allowed to criticize any legitimate Jewish wrongdoing. Immediately, a woman or a man, I’m not sure, they say they are a transgender person named Samuel, in the very front row, immediately begins to interrupt me, stating that antisemitism is not OK. She has been brainwashed to think that any legitimate criticism of Jews is antisemitism. This is from a young woman who likely has never read three history books in her entire life. But she has no problem marching to City Hall and insisting that she is a judge of what everyone in the city of Sacramento can and cannot say. Amazing, they cannot even figure out what sex they are, they know absolutely nothing about history, but they sit there and terrorize the city into thinking that they are an authority on what the rest of us can say.
This is not new; I began speaking at city council meetings in Vallejo 11 years ago and have been interrupted at least 50 to 100 times in the past 11 years. The members of the City Council, and mayors, will never remove unruly members of the audience who interrupt speakers who differ with the mayor and city council ideologically. They deliberately allow these interruptions, which are meant to terrorize opposing speakers from City Council meetings.
In the first few weeks that I attended, I was followed to my car a number of times by likely antifa activists. One young gentleman and his friend followed me to my car and were trying to hide behind trees and buildings to avoid detection. Picture this, if you will; I am 165 pounds soaking wet, and here is a 6’4”, 250-pound man following me to my car after meetings. Does anyone think this is not meant to intimidate me? The same young man, according to my friend Jeff Perrine, has been involved in violent intimidation before. At the meeting on May 24, this young man, unprovoked, actually physically assaulted one of the gentlemen that showed up to support free speech. This, right in City Hall chambers, with police presence. The week before, at the meeting on May 15, this young man sat two rows in front of me and asked me twice did I want to go outside. So he is threatening violence right in the City Hall chambers with someone he disagrees with. There was no chance to have a conversation with him because he approached me and said, “Hey Nazi, want to go outside”? How do you converse with a young man who does not understand anything about World War II and is wrongly deceived into thinking you are a Nazi and are hostile? The short answer is you don’t.
It is the job of every mayor in America, and every city Council, to ensure that when a speaker is called upon, they are allowed to state their opinion without interruptions from the audience. This Mayor and this City Council have miserably failed in their constitutional duty to uphold the First Amendment. They do not seem to realize that the First Amendment does not just apply to their favorites and people who say nice things they like. The First Amendment is for all citizens, and as long as there is no incitement to violence, which I have never done, then every citizen has a right to speak.
The Mayor and City Council have actively allowed and encouraged speakers to interrupt, and they sit back and take pleasure in this, feeling that justice is being carried out. I’m sorry to let them know this; justice is not allowing mobs to silence speakers. We have a democracy; we do not have a mobocracy.
What is so hypocritical about this is members of the audience who interrupt me don’t just interrupt me. They interrupt other speakers, they interrupt members of the City Council, and they interrupt the Mayor. One young lady, who is part of the trio that I mentioned before, stood up when it wasn’t her turn to talk and said, “F*** Darrell Steinberg,” and Mayor Steinberg said that she was going to be kicked out, never followed up with it, and she continues interrupting him and me to this day.
What the media and members of the City Council want you to think is these are average members of Sacramento, but they are not. These are very radical types that are organized. Not sure if they are paid or not, but at the very least, they are brainwashed; at the very worst, they are agents. They are clear about being for black and brown rights, which I have no problem with; however, if you are white and you have a different opinion, they feel entitled to shout you down. They do not understand that loxism and antarianism are having a hatred of white people, and as a result, they are full of it. No one hates them; they are allowed to have unrestricted rights, they have not been threatened, they have not been attacked, and they have not been interrupted. But they feel free to do this to everyone they disagree with, especially Whites.
Mayor Steinberg and Miss Kaplan dislike being criticized for their religion. However, this is very hard to understand because they would both be in jail under the Old Testament Mosaic law. We are not in a theocracy; you are not elected to office to silence all legitimate criticism of your religion. However, the behavior of the mayor and Miss Kaplan has been wildly outrageous. The mayor has gone on television and the record in newspapers, saying there is hate, bigotry, antisemitism, and racism at City Hall when nothing I said qualifies for that. This has had the effect of riling up already unstable individuals; whether because of their drug use, or mental issues, they now become very violent. And this is a direct result of the mayor’s incitement to violence.
Further, Miss Kaplan does an interview with television, saying that she ended the City Council meeting because she felt unsafe. She mentions that a few men who showed up to support free speech had masks on; she half lies because she does not say that her side also had covers on. How could she possibly feel unsafe? There were five of us in the audience, there were metal detectors, and we obviously had no weapons. She was surrounded by 30 activists who supported her, and there were 50 police officers within five minutes that could’ve been called; what is there to feel unsafe about, Miss Kaplan? Or were you getting hysterical and hyperventilating? While lying about feeling unsafe, she deliberately encourages a dangerous environment for my friends and me because we were attacked right in City Hall chambers, and we have been threatened many times and followed to our cars. We face many incitements to violence online. All this intimidation and terrorizing result from a mayor and city council who feel it is their duty to use mobs to silence those who disagree with their dysfunctional and flat-out evil agendas. The media has been used to run interference for corrupt politicians for centuries.
Also, consider I have emailed every single member of the City Council and the mayor and received no response, I have personally called Miss Kaplan, and she promptly hung up on me. So while they like to talk behind my back, they will not speak with me. When a member of your community has a concern, it is your duty to listen. If you don’t like what they have to say and you disagree with what they say, then go ahead and present the facts that show they are incorrect. But if you cannot do this, then you likely are wrong, and if you are wrong and try to defend yourself by organizing mobs, which is precisely what you are doing, you are going to be held responsible for the outcome of that.
All newspapers and television stations will be notified of your perfidy, and as mentioned earlier, any injuries or damage caused by your malicious lying will be 100% your responsibility. So you probably better get out in front of it because if unruly mobs go wild, you will have much to answer for.
(Most of these young women will not have successful marriages and children)
In honor of June, “Gay Pride” month, I re-post
the classic 1995 essay by Charles Socarides, a psychiatrist
who treated hundreds of gays for arrested development
over his 40-year-career and cured about a third.
Until 1975, homosexuality was recognized for what it is, a developmental disorder. The massive crusade to mainstream homosexuality is characteristic of Satanism, which pretends that sick is healthy and unnatural is natural. It is irrefutable proof society is satanically possessed. Mankind has been colonized by a satanic cult, Freemasonry (Jewish Cabalism) which is a proxy for the Cabalist Jewish central banking cartel. Our political, economic and cultural leaders are traitors, factotum for the satanist banking cartel that controls society through credit.
The promotion of homosexuality is designed to depopulate and destabilize society by destroying the nuclear family. How can you Lefties be so stupid?
Aren’t you suspicious that every single corporation is promoting this developmental disorder? Homosexuality is another depopulation psy op like COVID which was nothing but the flu rebranded. Are you Leftists not just gullible conformists but also stupid?
We have compassion and affection for individual gays who often are very kind, and talented. It’s not their fault that their mothers were overbearing or they were abused as youths. We feel no more animosity toward them than we would for someone who was autistic. But we oppose the Illuminati plan to subvert society by spreading this disorder until it becomes the social norm.
The real issue is heterophobia, not homophobia.
“We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order…We shall destroy every collective force except our own.” Protocols of Zion 16 Collective forces include race, religion (God), nationhood and family (gender.)
Part One: “How America Went Gay”
from Feb. 8, 2014 and May 25, 2022by Charles Socarides MD (Edited & Abridged by henrymakow.com)
Charles W. Socarides, M.D., (1922-2005) was a clinical professor of psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. For more than 20 years, I and a few psychiatrists have felt like an embattled minority, because we have continued to insist that gays aren’t born that way.
For most of this (20th) century, we have considered this behavior aberrant…a pathology. We had patients who would seek out one sex partner after another-total strangers-on a single night, then come limping into our offices the next day to tell us how they were hurting themselves. Since we were in the business of helping people learn how not to keep hurting themselves, many of us thought we were quietly doing God’s work.
Now, in the opinion of those who make up the so-called cultural elite, our view is “out of date.” The elite says we hurt people more than we help them, and that we belong in one of the century’s dustbins. They have managed to sell this idea to a great many Americans, thereby making homosexuality fashionable and raising formerly aberrant behavior to the status of an “alternate lifestyle.”…
HOMOSEXUAL REVOLUTION ORCHESTRATED
How did this change come about? Well, the revolution did not just happen…It was all part of a plan, as one gay publication put it, “to make the whole world gay.” I am not making this up. You can read an account of the campaign in Dennis Altman’s The Homosexualization of America. In 1982 Altman, himself gay, reported with an air of elation that more and more Americans were thinking like gays and acting like gays. There were engaged, that is, “in numbers of short-lived sexual adventures either in place of or alongside long-term relationships.” Altman cited the heterosexual equivalents of gay saunas and the emergence of the swinging singles scene as proofs that “promiscuity and ‘impersonal sex’ are determined more by social possibilities than by inherent differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals, or even between men and women.”
Heady stuff. Gays said they could “reinvent human nature, reinvent themselves.” To do this, these re-inventors had to clear away one major obstacle. No, they didn’t go after the nation’s clergy. They targeted the members of a worldly priesthood, the psychiatric community, and neutralized them with a radical redefinition of homosexuality itself. In 1972 and 1973 they co-opted the leadership of the American Psychiatric Association and, through a series of political manoeuvres, lies and outright flim-flams, they “cured” homosexuality overnight-by fiat. They got the A.P.A. to say that same-sex sex was “not a disorder.” It was merely “a condition”-as neutral as left-handedness.
HATRED,INTIMIDATION & INTOLERANCE
This amounted to full approval of homosexuality. Those of us who did not go along with the political redefinition were soon silenced at our own professional meetings. Our lectures were cancelled inside academe and our research papers turned down in the learned journals. Worse things followed in the culture at large. Television and movie producers began to do stories promoting homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle.[“For some years now, gays have been disrupting our meetings, shouting down people trying to deliver their scientific papers, threatening individual doctors like myself…The gay activists have a ferocious irrationality. They turn every scientific agreement into a political issue — which is all they can really do since the only science they have going for them is pseudoscience.”Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Farpp.153-154]
A gay review board told Hollywood how it should deal with or not deal with homosexuality. Mainstream publishers turned down books that objected to the gay revolution. Gays and lesbians influenced sex education in our nation’s schools, and gay and lesbian libbers seized wide control of faculty committees in our nations’ colleges. State legislatures nullified laws against sodomy.
If the print media paid any attention at all, they tended to hail the gay revolution, possibly because many of the reporters on gay issues were themselves gay and open advocates for the movement. And those reporters who were not gay seemed too intimidated by groupthink to expose what was going on in their own newsrooms.
And now, what happens to those of us who stand up and object? Gay activists have already anticipated that. They have created a kind of conventional wisdom: that we suffer from homophobia, a disease that has actually been invented by gays projecting their own fear on society. And we are bigots besides, because, they say, we fail to deal with gays compassionately.
Gays are now no different than people born black or Hispanic or physically challenged. Since gays are born that way and have no choice about their sexual orientation, anyone who calls same-sex sex an aberration is now a bigot. Un-American, too. Astoundingly now, college freshmen come home for their first Thanksgiving to announce, “Hey, Mom! Hey, Dad! We’ve taken the high moral ground. We’ve joined the gay revolution.”
BRAINWASHEDMy wife, Clare, who has an unerring aptitude for getting to the heart of things, said one day recently in passing, “I think everybody’s being brainwashed.” That gave me a start. I know “brainwashing” is a term that has been used and overused. But my wife’s casual observation only reminded me of a brilliant tract I had read several years ago and then forgotten. It was called After the Ball: How America Will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gaysin the 1990s, by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen.
That book turned out to be the blueprint gay activists would use in their campaign to normalize the abnormal through a variety of brainwashing techniques once catalogued by Robert Jay Lifton in his seminal work, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brainwashing in China.
These activists got the media and the money to radicalize America-by processes known as desensitization, jamming and conversion. They would desensitize the public by selling the notion that gays were “just like everyone else.” This would make the engine of prejudice run out of steam, i.e., lull straights into an attitude of indifference.
They would jam the public by shaming them into a kind of guilt at their own “bigotry.” Kirk and Madsen wrote:
All normal persons feel shame when they perceive that they are not thinking, feeling, or acting like one of the pack….The trick is to get the bigot into the position of feeling a conflicting twinge of shame…when his homo-hatred surfaces. Thus, propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homo-hating bigots as crude loudmouths….It can show them being criticized, hated, shunned. It can depict gays experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homo-hatred-suffering of which even most bigots would be ashamed to be the cause.
Finally-this was the process they called conversion-Kirk and Madsen predicted a mass public change of heart would follow, even among bigots, “if we can actually make them like us.” They wrote, “Conversion aims at just this…conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.”In the movie “Philadelphia” we see the shaming technique and the conversion process working at the highest media level. We saw Tom Hank’s character suffering (because he was gay and had AIDS) at the hands of bigots in his Philadelphia law firm. Not only were we ashamed of the homophobic behavior of the villainous straight lawyers in the firm; we felt nothing but sympathy for the suffering Hanks. (Members of the Motion Picture Academy felt so much sympathy they gave Hanks an Oscar.) Our feelings helped fulfil Kirk and Madsen’s strategy: “to make Americans hold us in warm regard, whether they like it or not.”
Few dared speak out against “Philadelphia” (1993) as an example of the kind of propaganda Kirk and Madsen had called for. By then, four years after the publication of the Kirk-Madsen blueprint, the American public had already been programmed. Homosexuality was now simply “an alternate lifestyle.”
Best of all, because of the persuaders embedded in thousands of media messages, society’s acceptance of homosexuality seemed one of those spontaneous, historic turnings in time-yes, a kind of conversion. Nobody quite knew how it happened, but the nation had changed. We had become more sophisticated, more loving toward all, even toward those “afflicted” with the malady-excuse me, condition.
By 1992 the President of the United States said it was the time that people who were openly gay and lesbian should not be ousted from the nation’s armed forces. In 1993 the nation’s media celebrated a huge outpouring of gay pride in Washington, D.C. Television viewers chanted along with half a million marchers, “Two, four, six, eight! Being gay is really great.” We felt good about ourselves. We were patriotic Americans. We had abolished one more form of discrimination, wiped out one of society’s most enduring afflictions: homophobia. Best of all, we knew now that gay was good, gay was free.