Month: November 2022

Speech was broadcast by ABC Radio commentator Paul Harvey on April 3, 1965

If I were the Devil . . . I mean, if I were the Prince of Darkness, I would of course, want to engulf the whole earth in darkness. I would have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree, so I should set about however necessary to take over the United States.

I would begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.” “Do as you please.” To the young, I would whisper, “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what is bad is good, and what is good is “square.” In the ears of the young marrieds, I would whisper that work is debasing; that cocktail parties are good for you. I would caution them not to be extreme in religion, in patriotism, and in moral conduct. And the old, I would teach to pray. I would teach them to say after me: “Our Father, which art in Washington. . .”

If I were the devil, I’d educate authors on how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting. I’d threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa. And then, if I were the devil, I’d get organized. I’d infiltrate unions and urge more loafing and less work because idle hands usually work for me.

I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. I’d tranquilize the rest with pills. If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects but neglect to discipline emotions . . . Let those run wild. I would designate an Athiest to front for me before the highest courts in the land, and I would get preachers to say, “She’s right.” With flattery and promises of power, I could get the courts to rule what I construe as against God and in favor of pornography, and thus, I would evict God from the courthouse, then from the school house, then from the houses of Congress and then, in His own churches, I would substitute psychology for religion, and I would deify science because that way men would become smart enough to create super weapons but not wise enough to control them.

If I were Satan, I’d make the symbol of Easter an egg, and the symbol of Christmas, a bottle. If I were the devil, I would take from those who have and I would give to those who wanted until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. And then, my police state would force everybody back to work. Then, I could separate families, putting children in uniform, women in coal mines, and objectors in slave camps. In other words, if I were Satan, I’d just keep on doing what he’s doing.

Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.
1 Peter 5:8

https://thetransformedwife.com/if-i-were-the-devil-paul-harvey-1965/

https://m.beforeitsnews.com/eu/2022/11/covid-19-how-the-greatest-crime-in-history-unfolded-2697086.html

((((Emily Oster)))) at the ((((Atlantic))))

http://www.madnesshub.com/2022/11/rooke-no-mercy-no-quarter-its-time-to.html?m=1

https://beckernews.com/finland-exposes-massive-covid-reporting-scandal-nearly-40-of-covid-deaths-were-fraudulent-47692/

I have applied to be reinstated. Heard nothing. I am 

a litmus test for free speech on Twitter

At Twitter, It’s “New Boss, Same as the Old Boss”

“You could say the Satanist Cult still owns Twitter. And then there is the matter of content moderation. The hopium has been flowing, as the downtrodden have hinged their hopes of account reinstatement on every Elon-Tweet™ with promises of “in two weeks” (why is it always two weeks?). 

By CK
(henrymakow.com) 

While the Twitter drama has been highly entertaining to watch, many people are wondering what, if anything, will change under the new management?
Will Trump come back? (he already said NO). 

Let’s face it, it’s fun to watch one of the richest people in the world troll one of the richest authors (Stephen King) in the world for $8 a month.
Frog marching the existing top management and firing 75% of the company is also awe inspiring to those who were mistreated by the 24 year old woke content Stasi. 

Maybe that phase of Twitter is now complete. It played a key role in the green revolution in Egypt, the orange revolution in Ukraine and the purple revolution in the USA
Time to retool for the next phase and none of those people are needed because it’s “mission accomplished” in the UK (WEF PM installed), USA (puppet Joe installed) and now Brazil, but the Brazilians seem to have seen enough of the movie to understand that they need to actually take action, we’ll see how that goes. 

Twitter 2.0’s goal will be authenticating all human beings, starting with an $8 per month fee, . Elon will sell a lot of these accounts if you need one to board and airplane or keep your bank account. You’ll presumably get connected some how to the Starlink satellite fleet, as well.
So what is really changing at Twitter? The ownership isn’t changing all that much.
 Elon owns more, but some of the old shareholders are coming along for Twitter version 2.0. 

As we have demonstrated, Elon is a key part of the public facing Deep State (aka The Cult – link to ) Twitter co-founder JACK DORSEY held shares worth roughly $1 billion after Musk closed the deal. 

He rolled his Twitter shares into newly private company, becoming one of its largest shareholders. 

And crypto-jew 9/11 participants Saudi Arabia stayed in the deal, too.
You could say the Satanist Cult still owns Twitter. And then there is the matter of content moderation. The hopium has been flowing, as the downtrodden have hinged their hopes of account reinstatement on every Elon-Tweet™ with promises of “in two weeks” (why is it always two weeks?). 

If there is one thing readers of this site understand, this is what happens when you hand over the content moderation to the ADL.In other words, “The new boss is the same as the old boss.”

Elon Musk to Crackdown on ‘Hate Speech’ with Help from the ADL and Other “Content Moderators”

https://needtoknow.news/2022/11/elon-musk-to-crackdown-on-hate-speech-with-help-from-the-adl-and-other-content-moderators/

Elon Musk has vowed to crackdown more harshly than his predecessors on so-called “hate speech”, and will operate a “zero tolerance” policy on content deemed offensive by a select group of moderators.

https://henrymakow.com

https://tv.gab.com/channel/cro_magnon1488/view/for-those-who-cannot-see-630572087e78b6ab068c1b4f

“Woman does not wish to turn aside from her higher work, which is itself the end of life, to devote herself to government, which exists only that this higher work may be done. Can she not do both? No!”The Suffragette movement from 100 years ago is today’s Transgender movement–a 100% media-created movement thrust upon us by the usual suspects.The following is based on an article from The Atlantic magazine dated September 1903: Why Women Do Not Wish the Suffrage

By Edward Menez(henrymakow.com) 
In 1895, the women of Massachusetts were asked by the state whether they wanted the right to vote.  

Of the 575,000 voting women in the state, only 22,204 cared enough about it to submit a “yes” vote.  That is less than 4% of eligible women.  Bear in mind that is for the progressive state of Massachusetts, and numbers would have been much lower in the Southern states.
So in a mere 125 years or so things have really changed.  What has caused the change?

One major reason is that men and women viewed themselves as different in the past, but in a complementary way.  Men and women are not “equal”.  Men have certain natural advantages in strength.  Women have the advantage over men in patience or forbearance.

A woman felt justified by raising a family, children, and by their faith in God.  She was not seeking power, argumentation, and combativeness, which were a man’s domain.  

The natural argument arose in the article regarding women voting: “Are women to make the laws and men to enforce them?” 

 This would be the logical outcome if women accounted for 50% or more of the votes, and voted in a contrary way to the men.
For instance: “Suppose that in New York city the women should vote for prohibition and the men should vote against it; is it to be expected that the men would arm themselves to enforce against their fellow men a law which they themselves condemned as neither wise nor just?”  (Good question.  We did end up with Prohibition in the United States starting in 1920 and it failed and needed to be repealed in 1933).

A woman had the direct mission to sustain life: to raise children, care for her husband and her home, and to praise God and His way of life.  She was a positive influence on others, and did not seek out the negative.  It was not her nature to be confrontational. 

A woman had more important and immediate things to do than trying to make laws, enforce them, and punish people who break them.  A woman is not an enforcer-type (police/military).  

(Fascist extremists, left, represent a direct threat to the Communist World Order)

Yes, women had a nurturing role back at the turn of the twentieth century.  Her realm was the home, which was the building block of a society.  Her highest work was to minister to life.
Women seem to intuitively know that “Ye cannot serve both God and mammon.” (Matthew 6:24). 

 It’s almost as if women look around at men and laugh at the silliness they do in trying to create a society structured on rules and laws, and the futility of men trying to keep that society incorruptible and apart from power and control.
As a disclaimer of sorts, keep in mind that this article from The Atlantic in 1903 was written by a man.  The Atlantic magazine was founded in 1857 by MOSES Dresser Phillips.  Its current editor-in-chief is Jeffrey Goldberg.  What sort of things does The Atlantic currently publish?  Groveling drivel that makes your blood boil.  

SATANISTS SHAMED TRADITIONAL WOMEN

I have often felt that women are naturally content to just let men wallow in their world of competition, while they stand apart, uncomplaining, and simply do their higher work.  Over the course of my lifetime, I saw the working father/stay-at-home mother dynamic of my youth change drastically.  

I saw the media begin to cry out for justice and equality for women, in the media’s incomparably twisted way.  This meant the beginning of Affirmative Action and women receiving high-paying “power” jobs.  This meant women competing directly with men.  This was not the complementary role to men that women were meant to play, and I think resentment started to build on the part of men.  

The media can always find a problem with something when none actually exists.  They then ramp up their shrill voices until we take notice.  Problem-reaction-solution.

It has thus come to this: Women, like men, now seek power.  The media tells us that women want “equality” in every way, whether that means being able to become a soldier or being able to look like a man.  They want women to have the power to cut off their breasts, kill a baby up until it is born, or end their family at will, thanks to No-Fault Divorces.  In fact, over 90% of divorces involving women who are college graduates are initiated by the woman.  

Lord Acton has the answer: “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”  By and large, women have become corrupted seeking “equality” and have largely turned away from God and His guidelines for the way we should live, which is given to us in The Bible.  

Did the power trip of today’s women start with less than 4% of them demanding the ballot-box? 

No, the media foisted this fake crisis upon us over 100 years ago, just as they are now foisting the 0.5% of the population who are transgender upon us as a way of life. The Suffragette movement from 100 years ago is today’s Transgender movement–a 100% media-created movement thrust upon us by the usual suspects.

https://henrymakow.com

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki. (left)

“It didn’t hurt Susie either that her sister 
Ann married Sergei Brin.

It’s a family affair, you see, if you wish to solve the riddle of any ordinary Jew’s success.”

Source 

The Riddle Of Jewish Success
By Brother Nathaniel 
(abridged by henrymakow.com)How many Jews does it take to change a light bulb?
None, the Shabbos goy does it.

How many Jews does it take to pursue a neck injury?

Tons, billboards upon billboards, upon billboards! tell the Jewish shakedown story.

And vy not?

The goyim prefer a “good” Jewish lawyer.

They know Jews are good at shaking down others for gelt.

Jews are good at a lot of things.

They excel in every profession.

They’re doctors, lawyers, CPAs, CEOs, and some are even heads of Big Tech.

Take Susan Wojcicki. 

She’s a Jew who rose to Google fame on the kosher agency of her father, Stanley Wojcicki.

Stanley was a professor of physics at Stanford where he reportedly did research for the CIA, a subsidiary of Israel’s Intel Agency, the Mossad.

Google, owner of YouTube, finally showed its kosher credentials when it kicked Brin and Page under the bus, and created its parent company, “Aleph Bet” in Israel, popularly known as “Alphabet.”

It didn’t hurt Susie either that her sister Ann married Sergei Brin.

It’s a family affair, you see, if you wish to solve the riddle of any ordinary Jew’s success.

You got to have the right connections.

And no tribe is totally connected up like the yids!

Take Faceberg.

A teenage Jewish boy named Marc Zuckerberg got into programming.

His Jewish family finagled him into Harvard where he met Dustin Moscovitz.

He was a fellow Jew, who reportedly got some Jewish funding to launch Facemash, which morphed into, Facebook.

In other words, you got to belong to the right synagogue, and every synagogue is the right one, if you want to succeed in programming….

Here’s a riddle for you.

How many Jews does it take to shape US policy?

One.

I’m talking about Victoria Nudelman.

Single handedly, this plump and pudgy Jew at State has convinced the entire US population that Russia is America’s enemy and that Ukraine is America’s best friend.

No more Nutcracker Suite at the Metropolitan Opera!

No more Tolstoy required reading in high school!

Just alot of Ukraine flags on every goy’s front lawn!

Forget the fact that most goys can’t find Ukraine on the map.

That don’t matter.

The riddle of the story is that Jews in high places, the press, the internet, finance, law, I mean, everywhere you go, have hijacked the American system.

They push Black Lives Matter like they’re the greatest thing since black beans.

But if a swhwartza gets out of line, then every fashion company, every talent agency, every bank, every footwear company–even Gentile ones, every celebrity–shiksa ones too–will “blackball,” no pun intended, that ‘Auntie Semite’ schwartza.

It’s yet another riddle of Jewish success.

Just ask Kanye West!
—
Related – The Secret of Jewish Success

https://henrymakow.com