Jews Run British Empire, said 1889 Book


(published in 1889)

Fiat Banking is Behind Imperialism   
By 1864, 

the Masonic Jewish

central banking cartel

already had concentrated 

the wealth of the world in their hands

. Western

imperialism (i.e. Ukraine) is a mask 

for the central banking cartel

plan to control all the world’s wealth.

“This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand preeminent Imperialism existing on the earth.” Imperialism of Jewish Capital

from Feb, 2019
by Henry Makow PhD

According to “The Red Dragon,” a book published in 1889  by L.B. Woolfolk, British (and American) imperialism originated in the need of  Jewish bankers and their Masonic flunkees to translate money created from nothing (thanks to their control of credit), into real wealth i.e. world ownership. 

When these bankers finagled a credit monopoly in England in 1694, they turned into a monster that now has hijacked humanity. 

The London-based banking cartel literally has gobbled up the planet, and will not be content until it owns everything, and enslaves mankind, mentally and spiritually, if not physically. This, in a nutshell, is the New World Order. This attack on Russia is the background to the Ukraine war. 


Russian Security Council deputy secretary Mr Medvedev said yesterday it was the ‘dirty dreams of Anglo-Saxon perverts’ to use war in Ukraine to ‘paralyze’ the invading nation (Russia.) Of course, he is too discreet to call these perverts by their real Satanist Jewish name. 


Today, Zionist imperialism manifest the banker agenda for “world government” through the destruction of religion, nation, race and family. This imperialism does not express the interests or wishes of ordinary English, American or Jewish people who have themselves been colonized. 


L.B. Woolfolk was an American Baptist preacher who traced the machinations of the banking cartel in the decades after the Civil War. He had contacts with members of this cartel during visits to London. He wrote, “the Great Red Dragon” is the symbol of the “Jew London Money Power.” 

In his book, which is online, he describes how this cartel bought up the US economy through intermediaries and controlled it long before the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. 

By 1864, 150 years ago, Woolfolk claims the wealth of the world already was concentrated in their hands. 

“The Imperialism of Capital to which I allude is a knot of capitalists–Jews almost to a man–who make their headquarters in the Money Quarter of London, in Threadneedle Street, Lombard, and other streets in that vicinity, where bankers have their habitat. 

These Jew capitalists have succeeded in centralizing in their own hands the industry and commerce of the earth. –They own almost all the debts of the world, –the debts of nations, states, counties, municipalities, corporations and individuals, –amounting in the aggregate, it is estimated, to seventy-five billion dollars, on which they are annually receiving about four billion dollars of interest. –They own the manufactures, the shipping, and the commerce of Great Britain, and most of the manufactures, shipping and commerce of the whole world. –They have attained control of the industry and trade of the whole earth; and are rapidly centralizing all business in their own hands. 


They hold possession of all the great lines of trade and business of all kinds, and they regulate all prices by their own arbitrary methods. This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth.” 

Woolfolk traces the spread of imperialism to the British East India Company in the early part of the Eighteenth Century. 

“In 1764, the British East India Company was the grandest and richest corporation in the world. It was the only corporation, which ruled a territorial empire. It was enriched by traffic, by the extension of its trade through the conquest of the trading stations of its Continental rivals and by the wholesale plunder of India….it came to pass that the greater part of the stock of the East India Company, and of the other companies afterwards organized out of the dividends of that great company, fell into the hands of the Jews. The Jews became the great Money Kings of the world… History presents no career of conquest, in which fraud, deceit and rapine were so blended as in the conquest of India by the East India Company. It was the first example in the history of the world of a trading corporation becoming an imperial power; and its imperial rule was marked by the rapacity, chicane and fraud that characterize a great corporation in the soulless and conscienceless pursuit of gain.” 

With the invention of the steam engine in 1775, only the capitalists of the British East India Company had the means to profit from the industrial revolution. They set up hundreds of joint stock companies–manufacturing companies of all kinds, coal and iron mining, railways and ships, real estate– which concealed their ownership. 

“In commercial crises, often originated, and always manipulated by them, they managed systematically to break down rival companies, and buy them out, and to rob and plunder the minority stockholders; until, in the end, these organized capitalists got into their own hands and very cheap, all, or the greater part of the stock of the various companies, manufacturing, mercantile and shipping, that originated in steam manufactures. They thus reduced to a system and science the art of crushing rival companies, and freezing out minority stockholders.” 

Woolfolk speculates that the Rothschilds did not act alone but represented a syndicate of Jewish bankers. 

(Crowns of Europe beg before Lionel Rothschild)

“The rise of the house of Rothschild is memorable as the first grand combination of the Jews in a syndicate, for the transaction of a vast business in which all their capital might be combined. The Rothschilds became the head of the Jew Money Kings, and have ever since been the head of the Jews, acting as a syndicate. That house is probably at the head of the Jew Money Power of the world. The wealth of the Money Power is simply beyond calculation. It cannot amount to less than $160,000,000,000. It is probably nearer two hundred billions… The Money Power has so much money, now, that it can not find investment for it. In one more double it will about have all the property of the earth. At the beginning of its career, a double of its capital meant $100,000,000. Now a double of its capital means $400,000,000,000. And all the property of the world is less than $600,000,000,000.” 

According to Woolfolk, the Rockefellers and most great American industrialist-financiers were merely agents of the London Money Power. Standard Oil is a classic example of how it established a monopoly in every enterprise. Owning the railroads needed to transport oil, the Money Power put competitors out of business by undercutting their prices. 

This cartel of cartels kept the business class in line by creating the spectre of Communism: 

“It is their policy to keep up a hot agitation for Communism and Socialism in the great cities; so that the businessmen, in their antagonism to those ideas, will keep on the side of the Money Power. It is a significant fact that most of the agitators for Socialism are Jews, who are most probably the agents of the Money Power to keep up this agitation for their own purposes… It is a part of the consummate craft of these Money Kings.” 


“The Red Dragon” is an important reminder that even 150 years ago, wealth and power were concentrated in relatively few hands. Modern history reflects the hidden machinations of this Money Power to advance their “world government.” The whole world is being colonized.

We see evidence today that one hand directs all the great multinationals. For example, they all sing from the same songbook of diversity, homosexuality and feminism.  All US Presidents are front men for this banking cartel. Their Cabinets are chosen from the ranks of the Rockefeller-controlled CFR. Presidents who defy the Money Power are eliminated. (i.e. most recently JFK and Nixon.) All the Presidential candidates support Israel which was created by the banking cartel to be their world government capital. 

This lethal problem arose because the nations of the world were too feckless to do something so simple as creating their own currency. They relied on a network of Jewish bankers to create their medium of exchange in the form of debt to themselves. No nation had the power or wit to break away from this worldwide imperialist system which is tightening its grip and inevitably must enslave mankind. Unfortunately, these bankers are not just interested in power or money. They are Satanists who wish to sabotage civilization and rededicate humanity to Lucifer.

We must reject this juggernaut in all its manifestations.  Common sense eventually will prevail not because it is common sense, but because continuous violation of common sense produces collapse. 

Related—–Makow—“The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism.” 

First Comment from Dan Butler (1955-2018) 

Yes, it’s important that the Rothschilds did not act alone but represented a syndicate of Jewish bankers.   The Red Shield takes attention off of others.  As far as we know the Rothschild clan may be fronting for a silent partner entirely unknown to any but the highest insiders.   

The ‘money power’ isn’t the whole story.  Nathan Rothschild served as warden in the Great Synagogue in Manchester during the early 1800s. The family intermarried first with aristocratic Jewish families. Nathan married Hannah Cohen, daughter of the powerful London merchant from Amsterdam Solomon Cohen.  Her sister Judith married Sir Moses Haim Montefiore, (Italian Jewish lineage).  He founded the first Jewish settlement beyond old Jerusalem, called New Yishuv in 1860.

Wikipedia says: “his correspondence with the British consul in Damascus Charles Henry Churchill in 1841-42 is seen as pivotal to the development of Proto-Zionism.” [1]  The Modern Rothschild family never concealed their substantial funding of the establishment of the State of Israel.   

Jewish children are taught from the cradle that Theodore Herzl is the primary founder of Zionism.  How can this be, when Herlz was born the year that Sir Moses Montefiore established New Yishuv?   It helps to know the complete history since public perception today sees Israel as a Rothschild project. [2]

What was the interest of these European money power men in establishing their own sovereign state in the Middle East?   

[1] ‘Notes on the Diplomatic History of the Jewish Question’ with texts of protocols, treaty stipulations and other public acts and official documents, Lucien Wolf, published by the Jewish Historical Society of England, 1919


“Modern” is Jewish Satanism


“America in Primetime” an overview of TV drama and comedy since 1950 shows that TV is social engineering, i.e. satanic possession

We’ve reached the point in TV where the hero is a deviant, misfit 
or weirdo. We cheer as he makes the world conform to him. 

Where have we seen this before? The modern alienated anti-hero is the Luciferian JEW

at war with God (the Moral Order,) nature and society. “Modernism” is Jewish Satanism

i.e. Cabalism, a solipsism where they redefine reality according to their perversions and self interest. Sick is healthy.

Is it any surprise that Hollywood is dominated by Jews and homosexuals?

Luciferians always push the limits of what is acceptable and make the unacceptable acceptable. 

We create our own misery by failing to worship God, who is the Truth at the heart of everything. 

“We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order.”  (Protocols of Zion,16 )
“We have already contrived to possess the minds of the goy communities…[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses.” (Protocols of Zion,12)

“All nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain, and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe.” (Protocols of Zion, 4)

“Television is the Satanic family altar,”Anton LaVey, said in 1966“Television is the major mainstream infiltration for the new satanic religion.”

Sept 2–Disney Airs Sick Satanic Cartoon “Little Demon” Plot Features Demonic Pagan Rituals and a Single Mom knocked up By Satan


TV’s Occult Message: Sick is Healthy 
Slightly revised “Television Ruined My Life”  from Oct 2013, July 30, 2019 & Nov. 15 , 2021
by Henry Makow PhD
When I was a child in the 1950’s,television was pretty wholesome. That’s how I got hooked. 

As a youth and young man, I was naive and idealistic. I assumed I lived in a benevolent and free society that was attempting to raise everyone to a higher level, materially and spiritually.  I looked to mass media and schooling for information, insight and guidance.  

After watching “America in Primetime”, (2011) a four-part documentary history of TV, on Netflix, I realize that TV is not entertainment. It is social engineering. It made me dysfunctional and depressed. It has done this to millions of people. 

“America in Primetime”  consists of interviews with dozens of TV writers and producers, and excerpts from their shows.  Although homosexuals and Jews make up perhaps 7% of the US population, they comprise about 70% of TV writers and producers. They hold up a mirror to life. If 70% were Irish Catholics, I’d feel the same way if they were degrading & subverting society.  

What Jews and gays have in common is that they are outsiders, many of whom feel unjustly persecuted and think their perversion & dysfunction should the norm. 

Most of my fellow Jews don’t know that Judaism is a Luciferian cult, a rebellion against God.  Cabalist (Illuminati) Jewish leaders wish to supplant God and redefine reality according to their perversity and self-interest. This is the New World Order.


They deny there is the natural and moral order, the Creator’s instruction manual in the glove compartment (our soul) required reading for health and happiness.  They pay lip service to morality but do whatever they want. 

The documentary pretends contemporary TV now depicts reality more truthfully. In fact, it has created this sick reality in its own perverted Illuminati image. Television is an indoctrination.  It has deliberately undermined what is healthy and inverted normal and abnormal. They actually have a show called “The New Normal.” 

Then, TV convinced us that there is something redeeming, ennobling and quintessentially human about being weird, sick and miserable. I’ve been in this “humanistic” space. It’s mostly self-pity. 


(Nurse Jackie, played by Edie Falco) 

Nurse Jackie, who is addicted to prescription drugs, torn between family and work and infidelity, has her consolations. The heroes of Weeds and Breaking Bad, normal middle-class people who become drug dealers and mobsters, have their moments of redemption. Jack Bauer, the hero of “24” does evil to protect us all from evil but, hey, life is complicated. Tony Soprano, a mobster who lives in a New Jersey suburb, wants the same things as we all do. Dexter is a serial killer who kills serial killers but don’t judge him. When he was five, he saw his mother cut to pieces with a chainsaw! (At least, he wasn’t sexually abused.) 

“Audiences are more sophisticated,” the writers tell us, “people want moral ambiguity.”   Really? Do we want it or does Satan?        

We’ve reached the point where amoral and violent delinquents, misfits and weirdos are the norms. They have made the world conform to them. 

The documentary is quite explicit: “Whether they are oddballs, losers, or just plain weird, misfit characters have grown beyond comic stereotypes and are taking center stage with a vengeance, refusing to apologize for who they are.” 

Thus in HBO’s “True Blood” the vampires demand “human rights.” They want to be treated like other minorities.  One character is incensed when someone judges all vampires based on the behavior of a few. That’s prejudice! 

Freaks and Geeks. Six Feet Under. Seinfeld. Glee. Arrested Development. The Office.   Self-absorbed misfits, i.e. Jews and gays, are the “new normal.”  


In the 1950’s, they had to rebuild, so the Illuminati gave us healthy values. “In 1950’s television, the man of the house was king of his castle. Was it an illusion to begin with?”   Father Knows Best. Ozzie and Harriet. Leave it to BeaverMy Three Sons.  

Was it an illusion? I don’t think so. Some things are hard-wired.  Most men want to rule their own roost. That doesn’t mean we want to lord it over anyone. But every successful organization is a hierarchy and that applies to families as well. Only a monster has two heads. The division of labor made a lot of sense. If you want a man to shoulder responsibility for a family, he has to lead it. It must be his creation. 

There was no moral ambiguity in the 1950’s Westerns. Good versus evil. Gunsmoke. The Lone Ranger. Have Gun Will Travel. Men were men. They put their lives on the line to build a just society. Women supported and loved them for it.  Then, almost by clockwork, having set up this target, the Illuminati got to work destroying it. Birth control allowed women to be sexually independent. Why not be financially independent too? 

A series of shows made women feel that being wives and mothers was “oppressive” i.e. healthy is sick. Homemaker and housewife became dirty words while fighting traffic every day to do some tedious work was invested with fairy dust. 

America in Primetime: “Far removed from the model housewife of yesterday, women today on TV care less about pleasing others, and more about being true to themselves.” 

Why sacrifice for love when you can be selfish?  Sounds like Satan again doesn’t it? Love is sacrifice. As if devotion to husband and family wasn’t “being true to themselves?” As if career success is the path to fulfillment for most women. 

TheMary Tyler Moore was the prototype of the “independent woman.”  When her mother asks her father, “Did you take your pill?” Mary thinks she is talking to her. 

“Yes,” both father and daughter reply. Thus, the show taught young women to go on the pill and have extramarital sex.

(Darren Starr, with Sarah Jessica Parker) 

Women modelled themselves on Mary Tyler Moore, just like they imitated Sex in the City, 20 years later. 

Lauren Hutton said this show depicted “women acting like gay men;” not surprising given its gay Jewish creator, Darren Starr. 

 In the 80’s, men started being portrayed as wimps.  Someone wrote Thirty Something should be called “Whine and neuroses.”  The only exception to this trend was The Bill Cosby Show where the father was the head of the family. Turns out he was a deviant too.

Like men, women are also hardwired — to want to belong to one man who returns their devotion. Most women want to put motherhood before career. Yet the freaks that control popular culture mess them up by telling them their natural biological instincts are wrong. Instead of saving themselves for their husband, they are “empowering themselves” by getting drunk and hooking up with strangers. 


TV and movies initiate us into the satanic cult which is modern society. A satanic cult controls and exploits its members by making them sick. Because television and movies were my reference point, I was dysfunctional until almost 50. I was obsessed with relationships and sex as a panacea. I didn’t know how to be a man. I idealized women and called it love.  There were no models of true masculinity. When dysfunctional sick people are your role models, you become dysfunctional.  Arrested development. Immaturity.  Three failed marriages. Confusion. Periods of depression. (I do take responsibility for being so trusting and gullible.) 

Why are there so few positive role models on TV? Why so few examples of healthy, happy life? 

My rehabilitation started when I started to question the messages I was getting and listened to my own instincts instead. 

Liberals like to think the social trends of the last 50 years represent spontaneous social change. Rather, we were being degraded and inducted into a satanic cult. The Illuminati bankers are waging a diabolical war on us, and we don’t even know it. 

Related – A Streetcar Named Heterosexual Bashing (How Gays and Jews combined to destroy the nuclear family)
———–TV Made Dysfunctional Couples the New Normal ————- The Culture of Critique————-Society Blind to Psy War on Heterosexuals 
———   Humanity is Satanically Possessed

r. E Michael Jones: Sexual Liberty as a Psy Op —Goes into how Hollywood and TV became subverted with Kabbalist porn and cultural subversion etc….First Comment by Eliezer

Television Not In Our Home (for 12 years)

Whereas a house is empty space, a home is sacred space. And we have through neglect, permitted the sacred to devolve into the mundane, even the profane. How many today for instance, sanctify or bless their meals? Wherein is the sanctity of modern life?

Too often we humans in the “developed world” opt to “live life” vicariously through a kaleidoscope of manufactured placebo experiences. “Central casting” is rife with occultic implications. The multiplier effect of modern technology has handed to a few the power to cast wider spells, gifting them with an ability to influence society disproportionate to their numbers — a portal into every home. The primary characteristic of tell-a-vision is its convenience. We’re caught up in a “tyranny of convenience” — immersed in a controlled narrative that encourages voyeurism.

Jerry Mander writes in Four Reasons For The Elimination Of Television,“the medium (tell-a-vision) is NON REFORMABLE — It’s problems are in the technology itself & are so dangerous to personal health & sanity — to the environment and to the democratic process, that TV ought to be eliminated for ever.” Would it be that those who conspire to “tell-you-THEIR-vision,” those whom we wouldn’t invite home for dinner, should then be granted a vicarious violation of our homes & sacred space? And because of its capacity for mass engineering of perspective, might not the “life” one “lives” thru TV not be our own?


There are many female preachers and pastors these days. In fact, it’s difficult to find a church that doesn’t have a female listed as a pastor. I decided to do a Bible study to find the qualifications that God specifically gives for women being pastors and preachers.

First, let’s look at the qualifications of men who are to be elders, pastors, and preachers in the churches.

“This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous. One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.” (1 Timothy 3:1-7)

Then in Titus 1:5-9, we have these verses: “For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee: If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not selfwilled, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre; But a lover of hospitality, a lover of good men, sober, just, holy, temperate; Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.”

These lists are quite extensive, and it’s clear that the office of the bishop which includes the title of pastor, preacher, and elder is to be the “husband of one wife,” therefore, these positions in the churches must be held by men. God is very specific in what types of men He wants leading His Church.

What about the qualification of deacons?

“Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre; Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience. And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless. Even so must their wives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things. Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. For they that have used the office of a deacon well purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 3:8-13)

Here again, this list is extensive and we have the office of deacon as being the husband of one wife. Deacons are to be men only too.

Are there any qualifications for women in leadership positions in the churches? I couldn’t find even one verse except to command women to learn in silence with all subjection, and that they are forbidden from teaching in the churches and being in authority over men in 1 Timothy 2:11,12. The reasons go back to the Creation order and the Fall in verses 13 and 14. Then in 1 Corinthians 14:34,35, women are admonished several times to be quiet in the churches since it’s shameful for them to speak in the church and if they have a question, they are to ask their husbands at home.

There are verses for qualifications of the aged women who are called to teach young women biblical womanhood.

“The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things” (Titus 2:3).

And what exactly are the “good things” that the aged women are to teach the young women?

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.” (Titus 2:4,5)

Hmm, the aged women aren’t commanded to teach the young women to be independent, have careers, make sure to have me time, listen for the voice of God apart from Scripture, or anything else that these modern day female preachers teach. Not one of them teach what God has commanded they teach since they are in rebellion to these commands themselves. They aren’t living in submission to their husbands. They aren’t keepers at home since they travel often to speak. They aren’t learning in the churches in silence with all subjection. No, they teach things that tickle the women’s ears and make merchandise of them. Mark and avoid these false female preachers, women!

But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.
2 Peter 2:1-3