Priceless: How The Fed Bought The Economics Profession


I am amazed this 2009 article is still online at the Huffington Post.

It is the template of how the satanist Jewish bankers control all professions including medicine, business, law, media, politics and science. Dr. Mike Yeadon says most of his colleagues agree that covid is a hoax but are afraid to speak for fear of losing their jobs and funding.  Harmony says this applies to medicine as well. (First Comment.)


The sheeple embrace slavery because they are already slaves and don’t recognize it when it rears its ugly head.  Everyone is controlled by money. And our feckless ancestors gave control of money to satanists who wish to destroy us. Humanity is infected by a terminal cancer, the Masonic Jewish central bankers who have been gaslighting us for centuries.

By Ryan Grim 
(abbreviated by
The Federal Reserve, through its extensive network of consultants, visiting scholars, alumni and staff economists, so thoroughly dominates the field of economics that real criticism of the central bank has become a career liability for members of the profession, an investigation by the Huffington Posthas found.
(Our leaders, media, scientists and doctors: Bought-and-paid for by Bill Gates who is a proxy for Big Pharma & the Fed.)
This dominance helps explain how, even after the Fed failed to foresee the greatest economic collapse since the Great Depression, the central bank has largely escaped criticism from academic economists. In the Fed’s thrall, the economists missed it, too.
“The Fed has a lock on the economics world,” says Joshua Rosner, a Wall Street analyst who correctly called the meltdown. “There is no room for other views, which I guess is why economists got it so wrong.”

One critical way the Fed exerts control on academic economists is through its relationships with the field’s gatekeepers. For instance, at the Journal of Monetary Economics, a must-publish venue for rising economists, more than half of the editorial board members are currently on the Fed payroll — and the rest have been in the past.

The Fed failed to see the housing bubble as it happened, insisting that the rise in housing prices was normal. In 2004, after “flipping” had become a term cops and janitors were using to describe the way to get rich in real estate, then-Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said that “a national severe price distortion [is] most unlikely.” A year later, current Chairman Ben Bernanke said that the boom “largely reflect strong economic fundamentals.” …
So who seduced them? The Fed did it.

The Fed has been dominating the profession for about three decades…
By 1993, when former Fed Chairman Greenspan provided the House banking committee with a breakdown of the number of economists on contract or employed by the Fed, he reported that 189 worked for the board itself and another 171 for the various regional banks. Adding in statisticians, support staff and “officers” — who are generally also economists — the total number came to 730. And then there were the contracts. Over a three-year period ending in October 1994, the Fed awarded 305 contracts to 209 professors worth a total of $3 million.
Just how dominant is the Fed today?
The Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors employs 220 PhD economists and a host of researchers and support staff, according to a Fed spokeswoman. The 12 regional banks employ scores more. (HuffPost placed calls to them but was unable to get exact numbers.)  The Fed also doles out millions of dollars in contracts to economists for consulting assignments, papers, presentations, workshops, and that plum gig known as a “visiting scholarship.” 
A Fed spokeswoman says that exact figures for the number of economists contracted with weren’t available. But, she says, the Federal Reserve spent $389.2 million in 2008 on “monetary and economic policy,” money spent on analysis, research, data gathering, and studies on market structure; $433 million is budgeted for 2009.
That’s a lot of money for a relatively small number of economists. According to the American Economic Association, a total of only 487 economists list “monetary policy, central banking, and the supply of money and credit,” as either their primary or secondary specialty; 310 list “money and interest rates”; and 244 list “macroeconomic policy formation [and] aspects of public finance and general policy.” 
Robert Auerbach, a former investigator with the House banking committee, spent years looking into the workings of the Fed and published much of what he found in the 2008 book, “Deception and Abuse at the Fed”. A chapter in that book, excerpted here, provided the impetus for this investigation….

The Fed keeps many of the influential editors of prominent academic journals on its payroll. It is common for a journal editor to review submissions dealing with Fed policy while also taking the bank’s money. A HuffPost review of seven top journals found that 84 of the 190 editorial board members were affiliated with the Federal Reserve in one way or another.
“Try to publish an article critical of the Fed with an editor who works for the Fed,” says Galbraith. And the journals, in turn, determine which economists get tenure and what ideas are considered respectable.
The pharmaceutical industry has similarly worked to control key medical journals, but that involves several companies. In the field of economics, it’s just the Fed.
Being on the Fed payroll isn’t just about the money, either. A relationship with the Fed carries prestige; invitations to Fed conferences and offers of visiting scholarships with the bank signal a rising star or an economist who has arrived.
Affiliations with the Fed have become the oxygen of academic life for monetary economists. “It’s very important, if you are tenure track and don’t have tenure, to show that you are valued by the Federal Reserve,” says Jane D’Arista, a Fed critic and an economist with the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
———————–Ryan Grim is the author of This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America
Related- Pfizer Lobbyists Claim Responsibility For Installing Ford and O’Toole Into Current Positions – Canuck Law
First Comment from HarmonyI’m a medical professional & I’ve known that this was a SCAMDEMIC from the very first day they announced it, & I’ve never been so disappointed & angry with the medical community as I am in this very moment. Unfortunately, I have conversations with other peers in the business & they’re fearful of losing their jobs too if they were to speak up & go against their employers. I get that, but in this case it’s also not saving the future for the children that they are just trying to keep clothed, fed, and homes over their heads. The children might live for today, maybe even tomorrow, but give it a year and it won’t matter. They’ll either be emotionally dead, or literally dead, or just wishing they were dead. Which hell will be worse? Complete enslavement of the human race or true death where your spirit is free & with God? If we don’t stand up today against the tyranny we won’t have a future worth leaving our generations to come. They’ll live in slavery, the most EVIL of all evils.

Total Page Visits: 2504 - Today Page Visits: 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *