MANY “COMPLEMENTARIANS” ARE DISOBEYING TITUS 2:3-5

Written By Pastor Joel Webbon, Right Response Ministries

Let me to begin by saying this: “ALL of Scripture has relevant application for ALL of life.” That being said, allow me to flesh out that statement a bit: 1 Peter 3:1-6 and 1 Timothy 2:9-15 are two biblical texts that explicitly speak to women. So a woman could certainly exposit these texts and apply them accordingly. This, of course, assumes that the audience being taught does not have men present (“older women should teach younger women”).

Now back to my original statement: “ALL of Scripture has relevant application for ALL of life.” RC Sproul once said, “Each biblical text has only one faithful INTERPRETATION, but virtually limitless faithful APPLICATION.” In other words, I believe a qualified woman could teach multiple other biblical texts that do NOT explicitly address only women, so long as the primary purpose of such teaching is to specifically apply these texts in relevant ways to women (that is, application for what God has specifically called women to be and to do). Again, no men should be present in these teaching contexts.

My reasoning is simple: “All of the Scripture has relevant application for ALL of life.” Therefore, we could rightly say, “ALL of Scripture is written for ALL people.” In other words, it is not as though one portion of the Bible was written for men, and another portion was written for women. Take the book of Proverbs for example: The vast majority of the book of Proverbs was written to young men, but the entirety of the book of Proverbs has application for women. Therefore, we could rightly say, “Not all of Scripture was written TO all people, but all of Scripture was written FOR all people.”

So when a pastor faithfully teaches a text like 1 Peter 3:1-6 to the whole congregation on the Lord’s Day (men, women, and children), there will still be relevant application for the men in the room (even though this particular text explicitly addresses women). Likewise, when a pastor faithfully teaches a text such as 1 Peter 3:7 to the whole congregation on the Lord’s Day (men, women, and children), there will still be relevant application for the women in the room (even though this particular text explicitly addresses men).

SO WHAT KIND OF “WOMEN TEACHING WOMEN” IS UNBIBLICAL?

What I think is “unbiblical” is when a woman teaches a particular doctrine or topic without specific application to women (even if her audience is exclusively made up of other women). For example, if a woman teaches on the divine essence of the Trinity (taking a relevant biblical text and expositing it), but the teaching is not specifically relevant to women in the specific things that God has called them to be and to do (“submitting to their husbands, loving their children, not slandering or gossiping, remaining pure, being keepers at home, etc.”) SOMETHING SEEMS OFF. This is because this kind of teaching appears to go against the specific guidelines laid out for older women teaching younger women found in Titus 2:3-5. With a teaching such as the one I previously described, why not simply reserve it for when the whole congregation is gathered together on the Lord’s Day, and allow the ordained (and biblically qualified) male elders to teach on such topics from the Scripture?

In short, my concern is that many evangelical churches are creating “EXTRA-BIBLICAL CONTEXTS” merely to accommodate a “PSEUDO-PASTORAL POSITION” for women who are dissatisfied with their God-ordained role in the home and secretly wish they could be preachers. And all this, while still attempting to be “CARD-CARRYING COMPLEMENTARIANS.” The result is that in the subconscious minds of many church members, the women have one pastor (e.g. Jen Wilkin) and the men have another (e.g. Matt Chandler).

The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; that they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.
Titus 2:3-5

***My two cents. When I mentored groups of women in the teachings of Biblical Womanhood, I was only teaching women. No men were present. With my online ministry, this is impossible. But I do receive numerous emails and private, personal messages asking me for counsel. This is all done in private. Any man who comes to my social media sites can immediately tell that I am only teaching women, since I stick to Biblical Womanhood. I try very hard not to veer from these teachings, since I agree with Pastor Joel. I do know men learn from me. They learn what kind of wife they want. They learn what they want their daughters to know. Many wish their wives would read what I write.

https://thetransformedwife.com/many-complementarians-are-disobeying-titus-23-5/

People Don’t ‘Trust The Science’ Because Too Many Scientists Are Liars With Agendas

There has been an unfortunate shift in Western educational practices in the past few decades away from what we used to call “critical thinking.” In fact, critical thinking was once a fundamental staple of US colleges and now it seems as though the concept doesn’t exist anymore; at least not in the way it used to.

Instead, another form of learning has arisen which promotes “right thinking”; a form of indoctrinationwhich encourages and rewards a particular response from students that falls in line with ideology and not necessarily in line with reality.

people don’t 'trust the science' because too many scientists are liars with agendas

It’s not that schools directly enforce a collectivist or corporatist ideology (sometimes they do), it’s more that they filter out alternative viewpoints as well as facts and evidence they do not like until all that is left is a single path and a single conclusion to any given problem. They teach students how to NOT think by presenting thought experiments and then controlling the acceptable outcomes.

For example, a common and manipulative thought experiment used in schools is to ask students to write an “analysis” on why people do not trust science or scientists these days. The trick is that the question is always presented with a built-in conclusion – that scientists should be trusted, and some people are refusing to listen, so let’s figure out why these people are so stupid.https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

I have seen this experiment numerous times, always presented in the same way. Not once have I ever seen a college professor or public school teacher ask students: “Should scientists today be trusted?”

Not once.

This is NOT analysis, this is controlled hypothesis. If you already have a conclusion in mind before you enter into a thought experiment, then you will naturally try to adjust the outcome of the experiment to fit your preconceived notions. Schools today present this foolishness as a form of thinking game when it is actually propaganda.

Students are being taught to think inside the box, not outside the box. This is not science, it is anti-science.

Educational programming like this is now a mainstay while actual science has taken a backseat. Millions of kids are exiting public schools and universities with no understanding of actual scientific method or science in general.

Ask them what the equations for Density or Acceleration are, and they’ll have no clue what your are talking about. Ask them about issues surrounding vaccination or “climate change”, and they will regurgitate a litany of pre-programmed responses as to why the science cannot be questioned in any way.

In the alternative media we often refer to this as being “trapped in the Matrix,” and it’s hard to think of a better analogy. People have been rewarded for so long for accepting the mainstream narrative and blindly dismissing any other information that when they are presented with reality they either laugh at it arrogantly or recoil in horror. The Matrix is so much more comfortable and safe, and look at all the good grades you get when you say the right things and avoid the hard questions and agree with the teacher.

Given the sad state of science in the West these days surrounding the response to covid as well as the insane and unscientific push for forced vaccinations, I thought it would be interesting to try out this thought exercise, but from an angle that is never allowed in today’s schools:

Why don’t people trust the science and scientists anymore?

This is simple: Because too many scientists have been caught lying and misrepresenting their data to fit the conclusions they want rather than the facts at hand. Science is often politicized to serve an agenda. This is not conspiracy theory, this is provable fact.

That’s not to say that all science is to be mistrusted. The point is, no science should be blindly accepted without independent examination of ALL the available facts. This is the whole point of science, after all.

Yes, there are idiotic conspiracy theories out there when it comes to scientific analysis, but there are a number of scams in the world of science as well.

The usual false claim is that the average person is ignorant and that they don’t have the capacity to understand scientific data. I do find it interesting that this is the general message of the trust-science thought experiment. It fits right in line with the mainstream and government narrative that THEIR scientists, the scientists they pay for and that corporations pay for, are implicitly correct and should not be questioned. They are the high priests of the modern era, delving into great magics that we dirty peasants cannot possibly grasp. It is not for us to question “the science”, it our job to simply embrace it like a religion and bow down in reverence.

Most people have the capacity to sift through scientific data as long as it’s transparent. When the facts are obscured or spun or omitted this causes confusion, and of course only the establishment scientists can untangle the mess because they are the ones that created it. Let’s look at a couple of examples directly related to human health…

GMO Crops And The Corporate Money Train

The propaganda surrounding Genetically Modified Organisms is relentless and pervasive, with the overall thrust being that they are perfectly safe and that anyone who says otherwise is a tinfoil hat crackpot. And certainly, there a hundreds if not thousands of studies which readily confirm this conclusion. So, case closed, right?

Not quite. Here is where critical thinking is so useful and where reality escapes the indoctrinated – Who paid for these studies, and do they have a vested interest in censoring negative data on GMOs?

Well, in the vast majority of cases GMO studies are funded by two sources – GMO industry giants like Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta, or, government agencies like the FDA and EPA. Very few studies are truly independent, and this is the problem. Both the government and corporations like Monsanto have a vested interest in preventing any critical studies from being released on GMO’s.

Monsanto has been caught on numerous occasions hiding the dangerous health effects of its products, from Agent Orange to the RGBH growth hormone used in dairy cows. They have been caughtcompiling illegal dossiers on their critics. The industry has been caught multiple times paying off academicsand scientists to produce studies on GMOs with a positive spin and even to attack other scientists that are involved in experiments that are critical of GMOs. Research shows that at least half of all GMO studies are funded by the GMO industry, while the majority of the other half are funded by governments.

There has also long been a revolving door between GMO industry insiders and the FDA and EPA; officials often work for Monsanto and then get jobs with the government, then go back to Monsanto again. The back scratching is so egregious that the government even created special legal protections for GMO companies like Monsanto under what is now known as the Monsanto Protection Act (Section 735 of Agricultural Appropriations Bill HR 993) under the Obama Administration in 2013. This essentially makes GMO companies immune to litigation over GMOs, and the same protections have been renewed in different bills ever since.

Beyond the revolving door, the government has approved many GMO products with little to no critical data to confirm their safety. Not only that, but in most cases the government has sovereign immunity from litigation, even if they’ve been negligent. Meaning, if any of these products is proven to cause long term health damage the government cannot be sued for approving them unless there are special circumstances.

If they could be held liable, you would be damn sure the FDA would be running every conceivable test imaginable to confirm GMOs are definitively safe without any bias attached, but this is not the case. Instead, the government actively propagandizes for GMO companies and uses hired hatchet men to derail any public criticism.

I, for one, would certainly like to know for sure if GMOs are harmful to the human body in the long term, and there is certainly science to suggest that this might be the case. There have been many situations in which specific GMO foods were removed from the market because of potentially harmful side effects. Endogenous toxins of plants with modified metabolites are a concern, along with “plant incorporated protectants” (plants designed to produce toxins which act as pesticides).

There is data that tells us to be wary, but nothing conclusive. Why? Because billions of dollars are being invested by corporations into research designed to “debunk” any notion of side effects.

If the same amount of funding was put into independent studies with no bias, then we might hear a different story about the risks of GMOs. All the money is in dismissing the risks of GMOs; there’s almost no money in studying them honestly.

The science appears to be rigged to a particular outcome or narrative, and that is lying. Science is supposed to remain as objective as possible, but how can it be objective when it is being paid for by people with an agenda? The temptation to sell out is extreme.

Covid Vaccines And The Death Of Science

I bring up the example of GMO’s because I think it is representative of how science can be controlled to produce only one message while excluding all other analysis.

We don’t really know for sure how dangerous GMOs are because the majority of data is dictated by the people that profit from them and by their friends in government.

The lack of knowing is upheld as proof of safety – but this is not scientific. Science and medicine would demand that we err on the side of caution until we know for sure.

The same dynamic exists in the world of covid vaccines. Big Pharma has a vested interest in ensuring NO negative information is released about the mRNA vaccines because there is a perpetual river of money to be made as long as the vax remains approved for emergency use by the FDA. It may be important to note that the FDA has said it will take at least 55 YEARS to release all the data it has on the Pfizer covid vaccines, which suggests again that there is a beneficial collusion between the government and corporate behemoths.

In the meantime, anyone that questions the efficacy or safety of the vax is immediately set upon by attack dogs in the media, most of them paid with advertising dollars from Big Pharma. These attacks are not limited to the alternative media; the establishment has also gone after any scientist or doctor with questions about vaccine safety.

There are clear and openly admitted ideological agendas surrounding covid science which have nothing to do with public health safety and everything to do with political control. When you have the head of the World Economic Forum applauding the covid pandemic as a perfect “opportunity” to push forward global socialist centralization and erase the last vestiges of free markets and individual liberty, any rational person would have to question if the covid science is also being rigged to support special interests.

Luckily, the covid issue is so massive that it is impossible for them to control every study. Instead, the establishment ignores the studies and data they don’t like.

The virus is being hyped as a threat to the majority of the public and as a rationale for 100% vaccination rates, by force if needed. Yet, the median Infection Fatality Rate of covid is only 0.27%. This means that on average 99.7% of the population at any given time has nothing to fear from the virus. This is confirmed by dozens of independent medical studies, but when was the last time you heard that number discussed by mainstream government scientists like Anthony Fauci?

I’ve never heard them talk about it. But how is it scientific to ignore data just because it doesn’t fit your political aims? Again, deliberate omission of data is a form of lying.

What about the multiple studies indicating that natural immunity is far superior in protection to the mRNA vaccines? What about the fact that the countries with the highest vaccination rates also have the highest rates of infections and their hospitalizations have actually increased? What about the fact that the states and countries with the harshest lockdown and mask mandates also have the highest infection rates? What about the fact that the average vaccine is tested for 10-15 years before being approved for human use, while the covid mRNA vaccines were put into production within months? That is to say, there is NO long term data to prove the safety of the covid vax.

These are easily observable scientific facts, but we never hear about them from corporate scientists or government scientists like Fauci. Instead, Fauci argues that criticism of his policies is an attack on him, and attacking him is the same as “attacking science.” In other words, Fauci believes HE IS the science.

And doesn’t that just illustrate how far science has fallen in the new millennium. Real scientists like Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCRtechnique, call Fauci a fraud, but they are ignored while Fauci is worshiped.

The Global Cooling, Global Warming And Now Climate Change Fraud

I can’t even get into climate change “science” here, I would have to write an entire separate article about the fallacies perpetrated by global warming academics (did you know that global temperatures have only increased by 1 degree Celsius in the past century? Yep, just 1 degree according to the NOAA’s own data, yet, institutions like the NOAA continue to claim the end of the world is nigh because of global warming).

The stringent bottleneck on science today reminds me of the Catholic church under Pope Innocent III when church authorities forbade common people from owning or reading a bible. These laws remained in effect well into the 13thcentury. Instead, the peasants were to go to church and have the texts read to them by specific clergy. Often the bible readings were done in Latin which most people did not speak, and interpreted however the church wished.

It was only the invention of the printing press in the 1400s that changed the power dynamic and allowed bibles to be widely distributed and information to spread without church oversight. Much like the creation of the internet allows the public to access mountains of scientific data and methodologies at their fingertips. The free flow of information is an anathema according to the establishment; they argue that only they have the right to process information for public consumption.

Cultism requires excessive control of data and the complete restriction of outside interpretations. As information becomes openly available the public is then able to learn the whole truth, not just approved establishment narratives.

Science is quickly becoming a political religion rather than a bastion of critical thought. Conflicting data is ignored as “non-science” or even censored as “dangerous.” Government and corporate paid studies are treated as sacrosanct. Is it any wonder that so many people now distrust the science? Any reasonable person would have questions and suspicions. Those who do not have been indoctrinated into a cult they don’t even know they are a part of.

By Brandon Smith, Guest writer

https://humansarefree.com/2021/12/people-dont-trust-the-science-anymore.html

Global Cooling Became Global Warming Overnight, And Now It’s Climate Change… Because, You Know, Climate Changes

The trillions-a-year climate hoaxstarted as Global Cooling in the 1970s, but when there was no scientific data to back the propaganda (which, by the way, was taught in public schools as scientific fact) became the opposite: Global Warming. But when there was no scientific data to back that either, the scam artists simply renamed it “Climate Change” because, you know, climate CHANGES. So how is anyone going to dispute that? What a sham!

global cooling, global warming and now climate change

Let’s Start Treating Everything Like Climate Change

Joe Biden has framed a $5 trillionlegislative program around Climate Change. The President has destroyed our ability to be energy independent because of Climate Change. Thinking Green is the driving force for our plans for infrastructure, eliminating fossil fuels, and replacing gas and diesel vehicles with battery-run cars and trucks.

Climate change is pointed to as one of the reasons for civil disorder, inflation, and illegal immigration. The good thing is that Joe Biden and his staff use climate change so often that they water down the message. It is becoming white noise for the Left.https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

We just witnessed one of the worst tornado disasters in our history pass through sections of Arkansas and Kentucky on Friday. Entire towns were destroyed by the wrath of Mother Nature’s power.

Joe Biden wasted no time addressing the country and blaming climate change for the storm’s severity. Biden had to return to those initial claims because there is no scientific data to back his claim. It was a quick response meant to fuel fear of Climate Change. It was seizing an opportunity to promote his agenda. It was cheap and superficial. It is why his ratings continue to fall every week.

Rather than bring solutions, he brings fear.

biden thunberg meme

Watch: Joe Biden enjoys touching kids inappropriately, even when he’s on camera.

Climate Change is not a solution; it is a theory. It has changed over the years, just as the name. The movement started as Global Cooling, then it became Global Warming, and finally it was changed again and it became Climate Change.

Nobody will dispute Climate Change as our climate has constantly changed since tracking data. It is not proven by anyone to be so critical or existential that we must transform every aspect of our lives. Some, however, would have it be so.


I am asking why we cannot give some of our significant challenges the same emphasis as this administration does Climate Change. Fortunately, Biden did not assign Climate Change to Harris, for that would have killed the initiative for the Left. Instead, he gave it to John Kerry, who will do nothing except use it as an excuse to tour Europe with the other climate doomsayers.

There are so many significant problems facing America that need genuine attention: The Southern Border has been removed. Millions, if not billions, of dollars of materials for the wall, are sitting in the desert rusting away. Along with the 175,000 known illegals crossing the Rio Grande monthly, we have enough Fentanyl to kill every American multiple times over. 

We have gang members and terrorists crossing, for we have no way of stopping or tracking them. We have crime, including homicides, on the rise and unchecked in Blue-run big cities. Opioid use is on the rise, and suicide deaths are skyrocketing. We have a country divided and becoming more so daily, not being helped by the poor handling of the COVID Pandemic

These were the two significant points that Biden leaned on to win the election. Neither has been a winner for him. He has let everyone down, and his Presidency will be, if not already, the worst ever. Good news for the Right, but terrible news for the country.

The Build Back Better / Green New Deal will probably not pass this year and will have an even tougher road next year. Many Dems will be looking to save their futures heading into the Mid-terms and abandoning Biden and his plan. Biden and Harris are finished in politics. Dems will be jockeying for the top spot in 2024. It will be fun to watch them chase Buttigieg.

The only salvation for Biden is if he softens his push for Climate Changeand starts putting that energy into saving, not destroying, our country. If he does, Carter will still hold the most dubious spot in America: worst President ever. My money is not on Biden.

By Ray Cardello, Guest writer

https://humansarefree.com/2021/12/climate-changes-you-know.html

Defy International Law? Kill Millions Of People? So What?

According to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989:7

“Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

So what?

depopulation china


“Acts”, laws, regulations, restrictions all come with penalties. But without enforcement mechanisms and the willpower/authority to use them, any “Act” is just an arrangement of words on paper to make politicians look righteous.https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

Consider: If the government – and the public – knew for undeniable, irrefutable fact the dreaded ‘COVID virus’ was developed and released in Wuhan with the explicit intention of devastating the United States and the rest of the free world, what precisely would any entity effectively *do* about it? …

Impose severe financial sanctions? Condemn China on the world stage with a sternly worded State Department press release? Demand reparations? Express outrage? The political status of America indicates the answer is none of the above.

Consider: According to the act“Whoever knowingly develops… or knowingly assists… shall be fined or imprisoned for life…”.

So what?

Does any sentient being capable of walking upright believe China’s Chairman Xi Jinping would willingly surrender to such an indictment? That China would pay a fine of any amount? Or be forced to admit its guilt on the world stage for violating the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, being responsible for the death of millions’? Only the recently lobotomized would check the “Yes” box.

In a recent scribbling, I posed two challenges:

  • Name the 2 things you come in contact with every day that are not taxed, regulated, embargoed, licensed, restricted, or prohibited by the Government;
  • Name the 2 issues impacting your life on a daily basis that have not originated from Government.

Answers: None and All.

With such an unambiguous universal indictment of government, how are we to understand – and accept – its continued existence? What “government service” could not be more economically, more effectively performed by private citizens working in voluntary cooperation to thei mutual benefit and, subsequently, the benefit of others?

Aside from national defense, what human endeavors would be hobbled by the elimination of government taxation, confiscation, regulation, economic restrictions, personal as well as commercial prohibitions, and the agencies that enforce them?

The 535 ‘elected officials” – and thousands of unelected bureaucrats – in Washington, in addition to the several thousand who comprise the elected, appointed, and assumed state leaders, total a tiny fraction of the 330 million people whose lives they presume to run without authority or mutual agreement; the ‘social contract’ is a dirty joke.

Which begs the question: Why? With such an overwhelming number of acts, laws, orders, regulations negatively impacting the lives of literally every person, why is government even permitted to exist? Anyone can write a declaration, a Constitution, an act or law, and with enough guns, command compliance. That’s not freedom; that’s not liberty.

By any logic, reason, or objective analysis, Government is a criminal operation of intimidation, the immoral imposition of force yielding tyranny camouflaged by the fiction of tradition, the designed ineptitude of public education and the principled failure of the press acting as the citizen’s “Watchdog at the Gate”, guarding against the overreach of government intrusion.

Consider: what was the last act of government that advanced greedom, protected liberty; that secured your unalienable rights? When did you give your consent to be governed by sociopaths, psychopaths, narcissists, pedophiles, liars, thieves, and incompetents? Where is your signed copy of the “social contract”?

So what?

Until a cure for the true pandemic of aggressive ignorance and its variants – contagious apathy, instant gratification, and technologically induced narcissism – the continued erosion of the remainder of freedom and liberty will continue, leaving “so what?” unanswered.

By Brian Wilson, Guest writer

https://humansarefree.com/2021/12/biological-weapons-anti-terrorism-act.html

Parents Blast Teachers For Indoctrinating 12-Year-Old Daughter Into Becoming Transgender

Outraged parents vented their frustrations during a California school board meeting where they discussed how teachers in the district attempted to indoctrinate their 12-year-old daughter into believing she was transgender.

[These sickos seem to be in every school, and they have direct access to our kids for many hours, everyday. What can we do to protect our kids against the war that is being waged on their minds by “elites” like George Soros, who donated hundreds of millions to push the Transgender agenda? They are actively targeting our kids every single day in school, while we are at work, unable to protect them in any way. What can we do? Please think about it as often as you can, and I am sure someone will come up with the right idea.]

parents blast teachers for coaching daughter into secret trans identity behind their backs

Footage from Wednesday’s meeting shows an angry mom calling out two Buena Vista Middle School teachers who she says coached her daughter into creating a secret trans identity, complete with a boy’s name, behind her back.

During her fiery rant, the mom said she was kept completely in the dark about her child’s alleged trans identity, and accused teachers of “planting seeds” of gender confusion in her daughter’s mind, telling them, “Your job was to educate my child in math, science, english, etc. Do your job and let me do mine.”https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

The child’s father, Gunter Konen, also excoriated the teachers and the school principal during the board meeting.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NwYWNlX2NhcmQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib2ZmIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1471359238811254796&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2021%2F12%2Fteachers-indoctrinate-girl-to-turn-transgender.html&sessionId=2537c4d1fd0f52ae248707e3130998a6fcd002d2&theme=light&widgetsVersion=f001879%3A1634581029404&width=550px

In a report by the Epoch Times, the mom, Jessica Konen, says school officials summoned her to a meeting where she was told about her daughter’s newfound “trans fluid” gender identity.

After being upset and crying during the meeting, where she was told to address her daughter by a male name, Konen was accused of not being “emotionally supportive” of her daughter, and says a few days later Child Protective Services (CPS) showed up at her home.

The teachers’ actions were further exposed during a California Teachers Association meeting in late October where they were recorded admitting to disguising a pro-LGBTQ student group, known as the “Gay-Straight Alliance” (GSA), as an “Equality Club” in order to fool conservative parents.

During the reportedly sold-out CTA conference, teachers were “showing other teachers how to undermine the authority of parents and school administrators and conceal activities related to gender inclusion and sexual orientation from them,” according to the Epoch Times.

The conference also included a workshop hosted by two Buena Vista Middle School teachers, titled, “How we run a ‘GSA’ in Conservative Communities,” in which they described overcoming obstacles posed by conservative parents by concealing the actual student club activities.

Teachers at the meeting also admitted to snooping on students’ internet search histories and online activities, as well as eavesdropping on conversations in order to find suitable LGBT recruits.

The Epoch Times report prompted the Spreckels School District to issue a statement last month announcing it would suspend the club’s activities as well as reprimand the teachers if deemed appropriate.https://api.banned.video/embed/61bb8bb8fd1b29245a0e7325

Sources: InfoWars.com; BitChute.com

https://humansarefree.com/2021/12/teachers-indoctrinate-girl-to-turn-transgender.html

Analysis: How ‘Build Back Better’ Would Make The Rich Even Richer

President Joe Biden’s “Build Back Better Act” is set to give a tax cut to about 67 percent of the nation’s richest Americans — those earning more than $885,000 every year.

analysis how ‘build back better’ would make the rich even richer

A new analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget reveals that the filibuster-proof reconciliation package will give a tax cut to two-thirds of the top one percent of earners even as the top one percent now hold more wealththan the entire American middle class.

“This is true despite the fact that Build Back Better would raise taxes substantially for the extremely rich (mainly those making over $10 million per year),” the analysis states.

In effect, those in the top one percent would receive an average tax cut of more than $16,000 in 2022 under Biden’s plan. The tax cuts for the wealthy would be a result of the plan’s increasing the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap.https://lockerdome.com/lad/12499747642786918?pubid=ld-1663-359&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com&rid=humansarefree.com&width=384

As Breitbart News has reported, the plan amounts to a $625 billion tax cut for the wealthiest of Americans living primarily in blue states.

build back better tax cut

Chart via Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Also read: Joe Biden’s Campaign Slogan ‘Build Back Better’ Was Actually Taken From UN’s New World Order Agenda.

“In other words, the largest tax cuts in dollars in Build Back Better would go to households in the top five percent and especially the top one percent,” the analysis continues. “Many make millions of dollars of annual income and tens of millions of dollars in assets.”

At the same time, Biden’s plan would squeeze an extra $200 billionout of American taxpayers by mostly targeting working and middle class earners with more Internal Revenue Services (IRS) audits.

The plan ensures nearly 600,000 more working and middle class Americans earning $75,000 or less a year would be audited by the IRS. Of those new IRS audits, more than 313,000 would target the poorest of Americans who earn $25,000 or less a year.

Biden’s “Build Back Better Act” has already passed the House, thanks entirely to Democrat support, and now awaits scrutiny in the United States Senate.

In 2017, former President Trump had the SALT deduction capped at $10,000. Since then, Democrats have sought to deliver their wealthy, blue state donors with a massive tax cut by eliminating the cap altogether or greatly increasing it.

Biden, for instance, had sought to include tax cuts for his billionaire donors in a Chinese coronavirus relief package earlier this year. The plan was ultimately cut from the package. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), in May 2020, also tried to include the plan in a coronavirus relief package.

Source: Breitbart.com

https://humansarefree.com/2021/12/build-back-better-makes-rich-even-richer.html