Covid is Communism in White Coat


(Husband-Carl Friedan revealed that Betty was never a real housewife but a pill-popping psychopath.)

I reprise this key 2003 essay about the mother of Feminism, Betty Friedan,

as a reminder of how Communists use deceit to subvert society. Like the covid hoax,

(re-branded flu) their appeals to “social justice” & “equality” are a con game.

They are grifters. Their real goal is to get rich by bankrupting the nation. 

Nancy Pelosi is worth $100 million.   Bernie Sanders: $2 million

Obamas — $135 million.   The Clintons — $240 Million

Communism is Cabalist Judaism which is Satanism

We have all been inducted into this satanic cult. 

We are under occult attack. Covid is Communism in white coat. America has been eaten alive by these satanist termites.  

Related-  Makow – We have de facto Communism and What is Communism?

“Comrades, you will remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy … The attacking army was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan Horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy camp.”

–George Dimitrov, Comintern General Secretary, August, 1935.

Betty Friedan: “Mommy” was a Commie

(Updated from Nov 19, 2019)

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Betty Friedan, the “founder of modern feminism” pretended to be a typical 1950’s American housewife who had a “revelation” that women like her were exploited and should seek independence and self-fulfillment in a career.

Friedan (nee: Betty Naomi Goldstein) didn’t mention that she had been a Communist propagandist since her student days at Smith College (1938-1942) and that the destruction of the family has always been central to the Communist Jewish plan for world tyranny. Nor did the Communist Jewish-controlled mass media point this out.

Friedan dropped out of grad school to become a reporter for a Communist news service. From 1946 -1952 she worked for the newspaper of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, (UE) “the largest Communist-led institution of any kind in the United States.” In 1947, Congress targeted the UE as a Communist front and its membership began a steady decline.horowitz.jpg

Daniel Horowitz, a History Professor at Smith with impeccable Liberal and Feminist credentials documents all this in his book, Betty Friedan and the Making of the Feminine Mystique: The American Left, the Cold War and Modern Feminism (University of Massachusetts Press 1999). Horowitz cites a union member who described how a Communist minority “seized control of the UE national office, the executive board, the paid-staff, the union newspaper and some district councils and locals.” 

Betty Frieden doesn’t want anyone to know her radical antecedents. Throughout her career, she said she had no interest in the condition of women before her “revelation.” She refused to cooperate with Professor Horowitz and accused him of “Red-baiting.” 

Why? Because her book “The Feminist Mystique” (1963) would not have sold over five million copies if her subversive background were known. 

Communists operate by subterfuge — pretending to be just like us. This is the “Popular Front” strategy that consisted of starting idealistic movements in order to ensnare well-meaning people, usually students, workers, women, artists or intellectuals. The membership was ignorant that their organization was funded and controlled by people with a totally different agenda. This is also the principle behind Freemasonry, Zionism and Communism itself. Essentially the adherents are dupes.

Willi Munzenberg, an early confidante of Lenin, organized the Popular Fronts in the 1920’s and 1930’s and referred to them as “my innocents’ clubs”. He pioneered the protest march, the demonstration, the radical bookstore and publication, the arts festival, and the recruitment of celebrities (“fellow travellers,” “useful idiots”)Screen-shot-2012-05-07-at-1.35.22-PM.png

In the words of historian Stephen Koch, Munzenberg, left, “was amazingly successful at mobilizing the intelligentsia of the West on behalf of a moralistic set of political attitudes responsive to Soviet needs. In the process, he organized and defined the ‘enlightened’ moral agenda of his era.” (Double Lives: Spies and Writers in the Secret Soviet War of Ideas Against the West, New York, 1994, p.14.)

In a 1989 interview, Babette Gross, the wife of Willy Munstenberg, described the Popular Front modus operandi:

“You do not endorse Stalin. You do not call yourself a Communist. You do not call upon people to support the Soviets. Never. You claim to be an independent-minded idealist. You don’t really understand politics but you claim the little guy is getting a lousy break.” (Koch, p. 220)

Friedan observed this principle when she helped start second-wave Feminism, which is a classic “Popular Front.” The very name, “the woman’s movement” and claim to be for “equality” are but a smokescreen for a diabolical crusade to destroy the institution of the family. For example, feminist professor Alison Jagger calls the nuclear family “a cornerstone of women’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.” (“Feminist Politics and Human Nature,” 1988)

The “Congress of American Women,” a Popular Front organization founded in 1946 reached a membership of 250,000. It was disbanded in 1950 after being required to register as a “foreign agent” by the U.S. Government. Feminist historian Ruth Rosen writes that the “CAW’s agenda prefigured much of the modern women’s movement that emerged in the sixties.” (Ruth Rosen, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America,New York, 2000, p.28.)

The FBI kept tabs on the “Women’s movement” but found no direct connection with Soviet subversion. Ruth Rosen, herself a veteran, finds this ironic.carl.jpeg

“Ironically, the FBI searched for signs of subversion in the Women’s movement but couldn’t recognize what was truly dangerous. While they looked for Communists and bombs, the women’s movement was shattering traditional ideas about work, customs, education, sexuality, and the family. Ultimately the movement would prove far more revolutionary than the FBI could ever imagine. Feminism would leave a legacy of disorientation, debate and disagreement, create cultural chaos and social change for millions of men and women, and, in the process, help ignite the culture wars that would polarize American society. But at the time these ideas were not what the FBI considered subversive.” (260)

By attacking the social fabric, feminists inflicted more damage to Western society than Communists ever dreamed. Domestic violence hysteria has driven a wedge between men and women. Women have been psychologically neutered. They are encouraged to pursue sex and career, not family. The US birth rate has plummeted from 3.9 children per woman in 1960 to 1.9 today, the lowest level in history. [Replacement is 2.1] The marriage rate has declined by 1/3 while the divorce rate has doubled since 1960. Forty per cent of all first-born US children are conceived or born out of wedlock. 

The feminist Trojan Horse has proven extremely effective. The question is why? How could a sick subversive philosophy that openly pits women against men have been able to succeed?

The disconcerting answer is that monopoly capitalists are behind both Communism and Feminism and use them to undermine the political and cultural institutions of Western Civilization.

Rockefeller-Rothschild cartels own most of the world and naturally assume they should control it too. They own most of our politicians, media and educators. Their goal is a “new world order” (a.k.a. “globalization”) in which they remake mankind to fit their nefarious ends.

Betty Friedan, take a bow.


Related- Makow – How US Communist Party Created US Feminism

Makow- Betty Friedan- How Jewish Dysfunction Became Universal


“Mama, you weren’t entrusted with this entire nation, you were entrusted with your babies and your husbands. Focus on what’s in front of you. There is great work to do within the walls of our homes. Don’t let the state of our nation distract you from that. There is nothing Satan would love more than for a generation of moms to fixate so much on what’s going on outside the walls of their homes that they neglect their greatest callings within them.” (Paige Hilken)

I posted this on Facebook the other day. Undoubtedly, I received comments from women who disagreed such as this one from Madeleine Richards: “And what if God has given you a talent to take on the world and your husband and your children and your church back you? Some women did big things in the Bible, outside of the home. Requiring all of us to ignore our talents and ignore that is unbiblical. What is your biblical basis for limiting women by saying, ‘Mamas, you were not entrusted with this entire nation. You were entrusted with your husbands and babies?’”

Now, I don’t know if Madeleine is a Christian or not. I receive a lot of comments from unbelievers who know nothing of what God requires of us. The sad thing is that many believers in Jesus Christ have no idea what God requires of them, since they don’t know His Word and have never been taught.

For one thing, God didn’t give talents to women to “take on the world” whatever that means. The greatest thing women can do to influence the world for good is to raise godly offspring, since they are the future generations. God created men to be the leaders in society. All throughout the Bible, it was men who were the leaders, except for Deborah, which was a rare exception.

What “big things” did women do in the Bible outside of their homes? Here are some in no particular order. Eve was considered the “mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20). Abigail was married to a wicked man and was used her to prevent a great tragedy. Queen Esther risked her own life to go to the King to spare her people, the Jews. Hannah pleaded with the Lord to give her a baby. The Lord blessed her womb, and she bore Samuel whom she dedicated to the Lord. She went on to bear five more children. Rahab was a prostitute who helped hide servants of the Lord from danger.

Ruth chose to stay with her mother-in-law, picked scraps of food in order to survive, and eventually married Boaz. Rachel was a patriarch’s wife and bore two children, one being Joseph. Rebekah married Isaac and bore two sons, Jacob and Esau. Sarah was Abraham’s wife who is known for her obedience to her husband and was blessed with a baby (Isaac) when she was 90 years old. Mary bore Jesus Christ and raised him.

Hmm, it looks like these women had no desire to use their talents to take on the world. They used their talents for their families and to protect their families and others. Most of them had lives that revolved around being a wife and mother. Remember, in most of civilization, there was no birth control pills they could pop to prevent babies. When they got married, most of them bore and raised children. If they couldn’t get pregnant, they mourned deeply. There were NO women in the Bible who left their homes every day, left their children to be cared for by strangers, and worked for a boss.

Then we go to commands that God gives to women. In Titus 2:4, God commands older women to teach younger women to be “keepers at home,” so they don’t blaspheme His Word. In 1 Timothy 5:14, He commands young women to marry, bear children, and guide the home, so they give no occasion for the enemy to speak reproachfully. God wants young women’s work, talents, energy, and time to revolve around their husbands, children, and home.

If your husband, children, and church back you to go into the workforce to take on the world, you may be gaining the world but losing your own family. This is not God’s will for women. God’s Word trumps every other word. He’s our Creator. He created us to be wives, mothers, and children. His desire is the family. The first command He gave to Adam and Eve after they married was to be fruitful and multiply. He puts the lonely in families. We weren’t meant to be alone. After He created Adam, He said it wasn’t good for man to be alone, so He created a wife for him. This is His plan for us, and it is good.

Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth. Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.
Psalm 127:3-5