NoVaxx Rebellion: Resist, Refuse, Reject

“All is not lost, the unconquerable will… and the courage never to submit or yield.” — John Milton

Have you given any thought to the strange events of the last 15 months?

Have you wondered why so many countries adopted the same policies that had never been used before and had no scientific foundation? Have you wondered why effective ‘life-saving’ medications and therapies were actively and aggressively suppressed? Have you wondered why world-renowned scientists, virologists and epidemiologists were banned on Twitter and removed from Facebook? Have you wondered why all of the cable news channels and print-media covered daily developments with the same breathless hysteria as their competitors?

It’s very hard to look back on the events of the last 15 months and not suspect that there is more to this Covid story than meets the eye; that while the infection does, in fact, kill mostly older people with multiple underlying conditions, that, perhaps, the virus has been used to promote a political agenda of which we know very little. Even so, there are things of which we can be reasonably certain, such as, that all of the fear-mongering and hysteria has been suspiciously manipulated to promote universal vaccination. That seems fairly obvious. In fact, managers of this Covid operation have stated quite openly that their goal is to inoculate “all 7 billion people” on planet earth. Wow. There’s not alot of gray-area in that comment, is there?

And, if that’s the case, we can safely assume that much of the hysteria was exaggerated to achieve the stated goal. It’s a pretty simple formula really: “Scare the hell out of everyone and then stampede them towards the vaccination depots.” At least, that appears to be the operating theory. And, I’m certainly not alone in feeling that way. There’s also, Dr. Peter McCullough, who is a Doctor of Internal Medicine and a Board-Certified Cardiologist. Here’s how he summed it up in a recent interview on Rumble:

“I think this whole pandemic, from the beginning, was about the vaccine. All roads lead to the vaccine. There are already places in southeast Asia and Europe where they are laying the groundwork for compulsory vaccination. Compulsory! The means someone pins you to the ground and puts a needle in you. That’s how bad the stakeholders want vaccination.” (16-minute Interview with Dr Peter McCullough, Mercola. )

Repeat: “It’s all about the vaccine.”

What that means is that all the hoopla of the last year –including the masks, the social distancing, the lockdowns, the closed schools, the ruined businesses, the shuttered churches, the Daily Death Count and the endless footage of hospital emergency rooms where anxious-looking medical professionals wheel comatose patients hurriedly down the halls and into ICU– was all concocted with one objective in mind; to prepare the sheeple for industrial-scale inoculation with a foreign substance which has not been approved by the FDA, did not conclude Phase 3 Clinical Trials, and for which the long-term adverse effects remain completely unknown. Could it get any weirder?

Probably.

Of course, now the focus has shifted to China. China, China, China. It’s all China all the time. The Chinese were supposedly fooling around with lethal pathogens at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Security was reportedly lax which suggests that the virus– that infected the world and crashed the global economy– probably escaped from a Chinese lab. So, let’s blame the Chinese.

It all makes sense until you dig a little deeper and find out that the US National Institutes of Health, “had funded the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology” to the tune of “$3.7 million project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses” (from 2014 to 2019) and shortly after, “another $3.7 million” (for a) “project appears to have included work on “gain-of-function”: research that investigates how a virus can gain the ability to infect a new type of animal.”

This funding from the NIH looks alot like a subcontracting agreement, although we need more details. But at the very least, the arrangement suggests that there might be some shared responsibility for the alleged leak?

Maybe, I’m missing something here, but it seems to me that the “blame China” folks might be too hasty in their judgement. After all, the “blame China” meme could just be another diversion conjured up to conceal US involvement. We just don’t know. Secondly, there’s no reason to assume that the alleged “leak” was an ‘accident’ at all, in fact, there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence suggesting otherwise. For example, how do we explain the fact– way back in October, 2019– elites from the Gates Foundation, the World Bank, big media, big pharma, the UN, the CDC, the CIA, the Chinese Center for Disease Control, and John Hopkins University, conducted a “live simulation exercise to prepare public and private leaders for a pandemic response”?

Now there’s an interesting coincidence. Some conspiracy nut might think these bigwigs actually knew what was coming? What a crazy idea, eh?

The confab was called “Event 201” and it gathered representatives from the main global power centers to walk through the operational plan that would be implemented to affect the outcome they collectively sought. Here’s how Johns Hopkins tried to dismiss questions about the suspicious event. They said:

“For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus, are not similar to nCoV-2019.” (Armstrong Economics)

Is that the lamest excuse you’ve ever heard?

Indeed. Are we supposed to believe that none of these elites had the slightest inkling that a few months later, the world would be thrust into a global pandemic in which the advice of their respective “public health experts” would override parliaments and legislatures everywhere conferring upon them political powers they never earned at the ballot box and authority to mandate everything from universal mask wearing to effective house arrest? They never saw that coming? They never mapped that out? The confab was just an innocent bull-session with their high-powered buddies?

Baloney. (Be sure to check out this you tube where the prescient Dr Fauci predicts a global pandemic. The video is dated 2017!)

Pardon my skepticism, but I think that Johns Hopkins might be stretching the truth a bit. Certainly, honchos from big finance and the intelligence community did not attend the meeting simply to “chew the fat” or to express their love for humanity. No, they were undoubtedly focused on more practical issues like putting the finishing touches on a plan to restructure the global economy and political system in a way that better served the interests of their fellow elites. A plan like that, would require a crisis of some magnitude, a really big blowout, like a global pandemic with all the bells and whistles. And, even then, it would require a competent and resourceful steering committee, a detailed operational-plan for mobilizing public health officials, heads of state, giant marketing firms, state governors, big Tech, big pharma, a battery of behavioral psychologists, and a small army of social media honchos. No doubt about it; it’s a giant undertaking that would take considerable time and energy. And that’s why we think it’s inconceivable that anyone would put that much time and effort into plotting and planning, logistical coordination and tabletop exercises, and all the hard work and bureaucratic drudgery if they were simply interested in saving lives or easing the suffering of the infected masses. That’s not why these elites convened Event 201. They had other goals in mind, and on the top of their list was mass vaccination. They want to vaccinate everyone-everywhere ASAP, and all of the developments of the last 15 months have been aimed at achieving that singular objective.

But what does that tell us?

If you believe, as I do, that the pandemic is being managed by powerbrokers who operate behind the fig leaf of political leaders, compromised physicians and dodgy public health officials; then what should we be able to deduce about the vaccine itself?

Answer– That they know what’s in it. And they know what it does.

You see, none of us really know that, not with any degree of certainty, that is. All we know is that the vaccine was rushed through the regulatory process without FDA approval, that Phase 3 clinical trials were never completed, and that the animal trials– that were conducted years before– ended with a pile of dead ferrets. That’s about all we know, BUT we can reasonably assume that the managers of this operation know what’s in the vaccines, because they never would have put as much time and effort into this grandiose project if they didn’t know. Right?

So, we’re dealing with asymmetrical knowledge here. One party has a clear advantage because they know something critical that the other party does not know. YET. But we will know, (eventually) because independent researchers are gradually piecing together a patchwork of information on how the substance in the injection effects the people that have been vaccinated. But that takes time which is why the stakeholders are going to use every trick in the book to vaccinate as many people as possible before the truth is revealed and their house of cards comes crashing down around them. Unfortunately, much of the damage will have already been done by then.

So, what do we actually know about these vaccines?

Let’s start with Dr McCullough since he testified before Congress and is clearly an expert on the matter. Here’s what he said in the same interview we linked to earlier:

“People are dying from this vaccine — the internet is full of these cases — so why is it being pushed like it is?… They want a needle in every arm… But why, especially when there are known severe adverse side effects?”

‘Don’t fall for the trap because it’s only going to make things worse.

This is a bioweapon, far beyond anything we have ever seen …The vaccine’s not safe.” (Mercola.com)

That’s a good summary, but we’re looking for a little more detail, something that pinpoints elements in the vaccine that make it so controversial. Here’s a quote from Prof. Byram Bridle, Viral Immunology University of Guelph, who helps to explain the shortcomings of the vaccines as they relate to the serious adverse effects which are showing up by the boatload.

“The conclusion is: We made a big mistake…we didn’t realize it til now… we thought spike protein was a great target antigen… We never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein… So by vaccinating people, we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin, that gets into circulation, and when that happens, it can cause damage, especially in the cardio-vascular system. And, there are many other legitimate questions about the long-term safety of this vaccine. For example, with it accumulating in the ovaries, my question is: Will we be rendering young people infertile?” (@DrPeterMoloney, Prof. Byram Bridle, Viral Immunology University of Guelph)

Ahh, so now we’re getting somewhere. The spike protein generated by the vaccine is no different than the spike protein in Covid itself; both wreak havoc on the vascular system. Keep in mind, “gene-based” vaccines are a hybrid concoction that bear no resemblance to traditional vaccines which inject live or dead virus into the recipient triggering an immune response. The new vaccines don’t do that, in fact, they do not operate like a vaccine at all. (Note– “Vaccine” is just a public relations moniker the drug companies settled on to build public confidence and shirk legal liability. The term does NOT apply to the new injections.) What they do, is penetrate, then hijack the cells in the lining of the blood vessels (endothelium) where they begin to produce spike proteins which generate an immune response. But here’s the problem: There’s a big difference between an “immune response” and rewiring your immune system so it reflexively produces toxins that accumulate anywhere that blood flows throughout your body.

It’s the spike protein that’s produced by vaccine-penetrated cells, has been identified as the “culprit” that is responsible for the terrible incidents of blood-clotting, excessive bleeding and autoimmune disease. The vaccines essentially flush millions upon millions of these potentially-lethal proteins into the bloodstream of recipients greatly increasing the odds that they will suffer the life-threatening conditions mentioned in the previous sentence.

Ask yourself this: Do you know what you are putting in your body when you allow yourself to be vaccinated? Here’s how Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D answered that question:

“COVID-19 vaccines are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, leading to neurodegenerative diseases.” (“Interview with Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D”, Mercola.com)

The point is, this is not a vaccine. As one scientist put it: “Is a benevolent hijacking of the immune system.” Can you see the difference?

Most people think they are taking a medication that will help their body fight the virus. Wrong. This is a reprogramming of the immune system. The cells now produce a spike protein which they did not produce before. In theory, this protein will spark an immune response that will prime the system for fighting future infection. But it’s all theory. No one really knows what’s going to happen because the vaccines are experimental and the clinical trials have not been concluded, so the long-term effects remain completely unknown. So, when we say the whole thing is a crap shoot, we’re not exaggerating. It’s a high-risk procedure and there are no guarantees. Here’s more from an article titled “57 Top Scientists… Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations”:

Vaccines for other coronaviruses have never been approved for humans, and data generated in the development of coronavirus vaccines… show that they may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)...Vaccine-driven disease enhancement in animals vaccinated against SARS-CoV … is known to occur following viral challenge, and has been attributed to immune complexes….which augment… inflammation …

The recently identified role of …Spike (protein) for inducing endothelial damage characteristic of COVID-19, even in absence of infection, is extremely relevant given that most of the authorized vaccines induce the production of Spike glycoprotein in the recipients. Given the high rate of occurrence of adverse effects, and the wide range of types of adverse effects that have been reported to date, as well as the potential for vaccine-driven disease enhancement….

Spike glycoprotein alone causes endothelial damage and hypertension in vitro and in vivo in Syrian hamsters by down-regulating angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and impairing mitochondrial function[26]. Although these findings need to be confirmed in humans, the implications of this finding are staggering, as all vaccines authorized for emergency use are based on the delivery or induction of Spike glycoprotein synthesis. In the case of mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectorized vaccines, not a single study has examined the duration of Spike production in humans following vaccination. Under the cautionary principle, it is parsimonious to consider vaccine-induced Spike synthesis could cause clinical signs of severe COVID-19, and erroneously be counted as new cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections. If so, the true adverse effects of the current global vaccination strategy may never be recognized unless studies specifically examine this question. There is already non-causal evidence of temporary or sustained increases in COVID-19 deaths following vaccination in some countries (Fig. 1) and in light of Spike’s pathogenicity, these deaths must be studied in depth to determine whether they are related to vaccination…” (“57 Top Scientists… Demand Immediate Stop to ALL Vaccinations”, en-volve.com)

Okay, let’s break this down into simple English.

1– Vaccines for other Coronaviruses have never been approved because the made the disease worse, mainly because by creating conditions in which the immune system attacked its own blood vessels and vital organs. (ADE)

2– The spike protein can wreak havoc on the blood vessels and vital organs even if there no evidence of viral infection. Thus, injecting people with vaccines that force the cells to produce spike proteins poses grave risks to their health.

3–The adverse effects from the vaccines are so similar to Covid symptoms, that they could be “erroneously counted as new cases of Covid”. In other words, the media and Fauci might be blaming the ‘variants’ for fatalities that should be attributed to the vaccines.

4–No one has any idea how long the spike proteins will remain in the lining of the blood vessels (not a single study has examined the duration of Spike production in humans following vaccination.”) or other the body. Also, no one knows how deadly or destructive the long-term effects will be.

Here’s more from an article at Conservative Woman:

“EVIDENCE is growing that Covid-19 vaccines may worsen the disease in some recipients.The danger arises when a vaccinated person meets the actual virus. Antibodies developed as a result of the jab can end up enhancing disease rather than protecting against infection.

Previous warnings about this potentially lethal effect, known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), have been downplayed or dismissed as theoretical by the manufacturers. The phenomenon has been seen with vaccines against other viruses but is considered very rare.

After reviewing published evidence concerning the effect, however, two US experts[1] have concluded it is ‘non-theoretical and compelling’.Receiving the vaccine could convert a subject from someone who experiences mild disease ‘to someone who experiences severe disease, lasting morbidity or even death’.” (“How the vaccine can make Covid worse”, Conservative Woman)

Of course, professional virologists knew that ADE was a possibility even before the vaccine campaign was launched, but they were blacklisted by the MSM, censored on social media, and removed from Twitter. Which is why so few people have ever even heard of the condition. Many people don’t even know it exists.

Doesn’t that strike you as odd? Doesn’t that seem like something you should have been told about before you agreed to get injected? We don’t want to believe that our government would knowingly authorize programs that could lead to our suffering or death. But how else do we explain what’s going on? Here’s more:

“… an international group of doctors and scientists have published an appeal to governments, regulators and vaccine developers worldwide to halt mass-vaccination programmes until safety issues, especially ADE, have been resolved. They say that given the high rate of adverse effects there is a need for better understanding of the benefits and risks, particularly in sections of the community who were excluded in most of the clinical trials. These included the elderly and people with prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing Covid-19.

Exclusion of the latter, the group says, is particularly unfortunate ‘as it denied the opportunity of obtaining extremely relevant information concerning post-vaccination ADE in people that already have anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.’ Without careful monitoring, cases of ADE or similar immune pathology caused by the vaccine would be indistinguishable from severe Covid-19.” (“How the vaccine can make Covid worse”, Conservative Woman)

Did you catch that last part about: “cases of ADE or similar immune pathology caused by the vaccine would be indistinguishable from severe Covid-19”?

This is the (evil) genius of the Covid vaccine, that is, when people start dying, their deaths are going to be blamed on Covid “variants” rather than the vaccine. Why?

Because the symptoms are nearly identical. As a recent study by the Salk Institute showed, Covid is primarily a vascular disease. In other words, it is the action that takes place in the bloodstream (inflammation, ADE, blood clots and bleeding) that kills people, not the respiratory virus. Unfortunately, the substance from the vaccines enters cells in the lining of the blood vessels producing spike proteins that are similar the spike proteins generated by Covid. The spike proteins attract platelets that cause blood clots, or they lead to bleeding (after the platelets are used up) or they create waste that is attacked by killer lymphocytes which damages blood vessels and organs. Bleeding, blood clots or auto immune disease; any of these conditions are possible following vaccination, perhaps, even probable.

So far, no one in the pro-Vaxx camp has acknowledged the potential dangers of ADE. Why is that? Why has Fauci remained silent on an issue of such glaring importance? Here’s more:

“The same may be true of damage caused by a toxin, the so-called ‘spike’ protein, production of which is triggered in our body cells by the vaccine. The protein is a uniquely dangerous characteristic of the virus, and the aim of the vaccine is to alert the immune system to it so as to block infection.

But not a single study has examined how long the toxin continues to be produced in us following vaccination, the doctors say. The jab itself may be causing the very symptoms it is designed to protect against, symptoms then erroneously diagnosed as ‘coincidental’ cases of infection. ‘If so, the true adverse effects of the current global vaccination strategy may never be recognized unless studies specifically examine this question.’” (“How the vaccine can make Covid worse”, Conservative Woman)

See? Like we said, the fatalities caused by the vaccine are going to be attributed to Covid which means that the media will continue to promote their silly “variants” theory even while the truth stares them in the face. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to figure out how this shell game is going to play out. Scores of people will die, but the vaccine manufacturers and their allies will escape blame by diverting attention to the goofy variants chimera. It’s a clever strategy and it already appears to be working. There’s been a spike in fatalities in nearly every country that has launched a mass vaccination campaign, but no one has placed the blame where it belongs; on the vaccines themselves. Who knew killing could be so easy?

So, the question we should all be asking ourselves is this: Did the authors of the Covid operation know that the vaccines were dangerous before the campaign was launched?

Yes, they did, they must have. But they rushed ahead regardless. They want to vaccinate the world whatever the cost in terms of lives-lost. Here’s more from the “now censored” UK Column:

“There is overwhelming evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (that is also synthetically produced by the Covid vaccines) is a central part of the mechanisms of morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2, and therefore is also a risk of the vaccine. In regard to clotting, that risk is greater if you receive a vaccine.

The data clearly demonstrate that the last thing you would ever want to do is make a vaccine that produces a spike protein. As the literature clearly showed, it would cause significant damage, including brain clots and death. And that literature, for the most part, was available before the release of Covid vaccines to the public.” (“Clotting and Covid Vaccine “Science”, Dr Mike Williams, UKColumn)

“Overwhelming evidence”?

Yes, and yet the vaccination campaign races ahead even while the mountain of evidence continues to grow. How do you explain that? Here’s more:

“…Autopsy studies have yet to find clear evidence of destructive viral invasion into patients’ brains, pushing researchers to consider alternative explanations of how SARS-CoV-2 causes neurological symptoms…. If not viral infection, what else could be causing injury to distant organs associated with COVID-19?

The most likely culprit that has been identified is the COVID-19 spike protein released from the outer shell of the virus into circulation. Research cited below has documented that the viral spike protein is able to initiate a cascade of events that triggers damage to distant organs in COVID-19 patients.

Worryingly, several studies have found that the spike proteins alone have the capacity to cause widespread injury throughout the body, without any evidence of virus.” (“Could Spike Protein in Moderna, Pfizer Vaccines Cause Blood Clots, Brain Inflammation and Heart Attacks?” Children’s Health Defense)

Get the picture?

In other words, researchers have known for a long time that these types of proteins produce clotting, bleeding and autoimmune issues, all of which can cause death. Are you going to tell me that the scientists who created these vaccines and the managers of this campaign, didn’t know the risks involved?

Nonsense. That’s just not credible. They must have known, and even if they didn’t know, they know now. So, why aren’t they doing something to stop their campaign or notify vaccine candidates about the dangers involved? So far, they haven’t even put a warning label on the side of the needle. They’ve done nothing; not a thing.

Would you call that evil?

I would, just like withholding life-saving medications in the middle of a pandemic is evil. There’s simply no other term for it. Evil is evil. Check out this final snippet from a piece by the Doctors for Covid Ethics to the European Medicines Agency (EMA):

“Our concerns arise from multiple lines of evidence, including that the SARS-CoV-2 “spike protein” is not a passive docking protein, but its production is likely to initiate blood coagulation via multiple mechanisms…..CSVT, cerebral venous thrombosis, is always a life-threatening condition that demands immediate medical attention. The number of cases you conceded had occurred can represent just the tip of a huge iceberg.

Given that there is a mechanistically plausible explanation for these thromboembolic adverse drug reactions, namely that the gene-based products induce human cells to manufacture potentially pro-thrombotic spike protein,the reasoned & responsible assumption must now be that this may be a class effect. In other words, the dangers must be ruled out for all emergency-authorized gene-based vaccines, not merely the AZ product.” (“Open Letter to the EMA from Doctors for Covid Ethics”, Doctors for Covid Ethics)

There you have it, multiple blurbs from three papers each claiming that the spike protein generated by the vaccines creates a myriad of problems. And we’re just scratching the surface on this topic; there’s much more research available if you know where to look. But we’ll stop here because we think we’ve showed that the mass-vaccination bosses know what the risks are but have chosen to conceal them from the public.

But, why? And why are they now pushing to vaccinate children whose chance of dying from Covid is zero, but whose risk of adverse effects from vaccination is significant? 

It’s because there’s something else going on here. What we’re seeing is the implementation of a broader strategic agenda in which mass vaccination is an essential part. What that means for humanity, we don’t really know. But we’re pretty sure that if people don’t wipe the mud from their eyes and figure out what’s going on fast, we’re going to be in dire straits.

https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/novaxx-rebellion-resist-refuse-reject/

Biochemist — “If You Took the Kill Shot …”

DeletePeople.jpg

Oops, we made a mistake” – they are already rehearsing their excuses for the deaths & adverse reactions that may sweep the planet. Bulik explains what to do if you were duped.

Cornelius G. Bulik has a Masters in Biochemistry, University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris France, and Master in Molecular biology and pathology, University of Montreal, Faculty of medicine.
“My interest is in the practice and means for maintaining a young and healthy mind and body even in advanced ages, such as after the age 70 to 120 and more. I am proud to be an example in this endeavour.
by Cornelius Bulik(henrymakow.com)
For over a year we have lived in ‘interesting times’, and have witnessed social changes  across the globe that seamed unthinkable just two years ago.
Most of the people, as usual, have no idea what the reality is, and just conform to what those in command order them to do.
Yes, we are told we are a herd, and we must wear a piece of fabric on the face and acquire herd immunity through vaccines against a deadly corona virus which changes (mutates) regularly in new variants, more dangerous and deadly than the precedent one, something never observed previously in biology! 
Any good virologist will tell you that any virus adapts and become less and less deadly when jumping species. But the politicians say the new corona virus COVID -19 does just the opposite. The new variants are more and more deadly. Children seemed to be immune last year…; not anymore, and they must wear the mask and get the jab as the rest of us!
”OVERPOPULATION”
Since antiquity, we hear regularly that we are too many on this planet. The remedy, was WAR; we read this in Homer’s Iliad & Odyssey with the war of Troy, about nine centuries B. C.
More recently, Malthus, Darwin, Galton, and others, introduced us to the “scientific” eugenics; and even more recently, Rockefeller, Turner, Gates push a culling of “the heard” – yes, you and me, and our children, and certainly not them!
For achieving the culling of the herd purpose, as Gates, in his TEDTALK said, one of the means is through “VACCINES” (and the “sheeple” in the audience clapped)!
Yes, the poisons they call vaccines are not vaccines but a genetic intervention tool; in fact the purpose is to make anyone who got the jab produce a GMO poison – the spike protein (just as the GMO goats produce spider proteins in their milk).
“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Bryan Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario. He warned listeners that his message was “scary.”
So, what does he means by “we did not realize”?!
Research shows that the spike protein from COVID-19 “vaccines” enters the bloodstream and kills the blood vessels’ endothelial cells, which explains the thousands of reported side-effects from blood clots and heart disease to brain damage and reproductive issues.

bulik.jpg

(left, Cornelius Bulik)
Surely, they knew, since they already observed this happening in animals injected with the jab years before they start to inject this poison to the people. All these animals – mice, rats, rabbits, ferrets, minks… all died once injected with the jab they inject now to the people; old, young, and children; It is criminal!
Now, because the cat is out of the bag, and we see the unspeakable damage the vaccine has done, and continues to do, the disclaiming discourse is “we did not know”!
“Vaccine researchers had assumed that novel mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle, they say now. 
Nevertheless, the Japanese data showed already that the spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulates in organs and tissues including spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and in high concentrations in the ovaries and testes. 
They knew this, and they know this now, and they still continue to inject this poison to millions of people – old, young, and children. How more criminal than this?!
We may conclude that this is done on purpose, to cull the herd – the human herd, you and me, and our children – Bill Gates said it blatantly in his presentation, didn’t he?!
WHAT SHOULD WE DO?

First of all, do not take their poisonous jab!
Just in case you did not know, and you took the jab, you should expect damage and even face death in the next two years if you do nothing.
Start by purchasing, or go outside and find white pine needles/leaves (white pine, fir, cedar, and spruce needles contain shikimic acid and suramin), and make an infusion in hot water with some alcohol or fat such as coconut oil or butter.
Use a lot of leaves per litre of water, and let them infuse for about ½ hour.
Better to use an electric blender to extract the shikimic acid and the suramin. Then put the whole in a strainer and press the paste with a spoon to extract the juice. Drink ½ a glass of this extract morning and evening for neutralizing the spike proteins.
For the prevention of blood clogs, you must take one tablespoon of natto (fresh or dehydrated) each eight hours. It is important that you take whole natto, not the purified nattokinase; this enzyme dissolves the clogs. Beside nattokinase, natto contains also other important molecules, one of them being vitamin K2, important for the health of vasculature walls damaged by the spike protein.
By doing this, little by little, your body is going to get rid of the cells producing the spike protein, and then you may consider yourself safe.
Keep in mind that vaccinated people seem to shed the spike protein around them. So, if you live in presence of such people, at home or at work, you must protect yourself against the shedding with natto, vitamin D3 (10000 U.I./DAY), magnesium, zinc and vitamin A.
Eat healthy food, expose yourself to sunshine and if possible, deep yourself into seawater regularly, and most important do not forget your white pine needles drink.
Best wishes for well being to you and your loved ones, and may God help us, and inspire us for better serving the DIVINE in us.—————–Related Horrifying study reveals mRNA vaccine nanoparticles are circulated throughout the entire body: Brain, heart, liver, ovaries, testes and more

https://www.henrymakow.com

YIPPEE! A SEXUAL COUNTERREVOLUTION IS COMING!

In The Spectator, there is an article called “The Sexual Counterrevolution is Coming.” All of us who love the Lord and His ways will be happy to hear this. The sexual revolution has been devastating upon our nation, and anyone with common sense left can see this reality.

“Narayan and his close male friends are all around the same age. They’re all elite guys working in tech and finance — and all either dating to marry, or already married. In what amounts to an informal 21st-century marriage brokerage, they and the wives of already-married members of their friend group collude to track down potential partners. But they’re picky — and Narayan is blunt about the criteria. It’s not just about being educated, ambitious or pretty. ‘Guys who say they don’t care about their wife’s sexual history are straight-up lying,’ he tells me. All the men in his group, he says, would strongly prefer their future wives to be virgins on marriage. Some categorically rule out women who aren’t: ‘No hymen, no diamond’.”

I guess my viral post Men Prefer Debt Free Virgins Without Tattoos wasn’t so off the tracks after all, as many women tried to persuade me. Men want to know that the wife they will marry will be faithful to them. If a woman is faithful before marriage to her future marriage bed, there’s a high likelihood she’ll be faithful after marriage. It sure has made it easy for me! I never practiced fornication and am thankful I never did. Men want to know that the wife they marry will bear their own children, not someone else’s. This is hard for many women to hear because of their prior history of sexual promiscuity, but it doesn’t make it any less true.

“Charlotte and Narayan are not the uptight fundamentalists or ugly, embittered feminists of stereotype: they’re members of the Ivy-educated jeunesse dorée. They’re pushing back against a culture of sexual freedom they see as toxic not just to individual wellbeing, but even to the long-term health of American society.”

These are wise young people. They can clearly see what the sexual revolution has done to their peers and others. I saw this in high school in the late 1970s. I had friends that were having sex with their boyfriends and then having abortions. I saw the devastation when they broke up after having given themselves in such an intimate way to someone who wasn’t their husband. All of this was so unappealing to me. I saw the wisdom in God’s ways from a young age.

“The current they’re swimming against is strong. Charlotte reports that, when she got engaged in her senior year at Harvard, her peers looked at her ‘like I was crazy’ for expressing a preference for children over a high-flying career. Narayan tells me that his views on the importance of marriage and the qualities he seeks in a potential spouse have left him facing accusations of woman-hating.”

Yes, the culture will do everything in its power to squelch what these young people believe, because they are going against the feminist mantra of careers over marriage and having children. The founders of the feminist movement hated God and his ways. Their goals were to destroy the family and everything about it. They mostly wanted to destroy men. Their father was Satan whose goal is to kill, steal, and destroy.

Reject this depraved culture that we are living in, women, and go back to the beautiful ways of the Lord. So what if people mock and criticize you. One day, they will look at your life and see that you went the right way, while they went on the broad path that leads to destruction.

Enter ye in at the strait gate, for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in therein: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Matthew 7:13,14

Yippee! A Sexual Counterrevolution is Coming!

THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT CAUSES DEPRESSION

Many female preachers and women have jumped on the Social Justice Movement bandwagon. But is this God’s will for women, and is it what we are called to do? No. In fact, in an article from Evie Magazine, they have found that Over 50% of Liberal, White Women Under 30 Have a Mental Health Issue. All women are taught in high schools and college is that they are victims, oppressed by the Patriarchy. They need to fight this injustice. You’ve seen women speaking at the Women’s Marches. They are angry and mean. There’s nothing feminine, kind, or having a meek and quiet spirit about them.

“The study, which examined white liberals, moderates, and conservatives, both male and female, found that conservatives were far less likely to be diagnosed with mental health issues than those who identified as either liberal or even ‘very liberal.’ What’s more, white women suffered the worst of all. White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives.”

As a Conservative Christian, I was taught from a young age that life isn’t fair. Yes, I’m white and “privileged” as many would claim, but guess what, none of us get through life without pain and suffering. I suffered from pain and sickness for 30 years. I was harassed verbally often as a child. I learned quickly that life wasn’t fair. We are commanded to not take vengeance, but leave it in the Lord’s hands. We must rest in Him, and understand that there will never be fairness while living on this wicked earth.

“But at the heart of the matter is this: Progressivism is an ideology that supposedly demands equality for all, and one that keeps score to an exhausting degree. The privilege between social classes, between races, between men and women, between religious and non-religious, and more, all have to be constantly monitored, and ‘inequality’ has to be exposed for the purposes of ‘accountability.’ That kind of behavior isn’t just unrealistic, it’s unsustainable. In all honesty, it’s understandable that anxiety and depression thrive in these kinds of environments when we’re focusing on every minute, problematic issue in our world and not able to take comprehensive, productive action to solve all these problems.”

This does sound extremely exhausting, women! We must rest in the finished work of Christ and find our identity and worth in Him alone. These women are fueled by anger. We are to be fueled by love for God and love for others. You can’t have love for others if you’re always upset with them. Am I always upset with feminists since I write about them often? No. I love the feminists in my life, but I know that it’s a destructive and false doctrine that keeps women far from God’s will for them.

“There’s also the unrelenting focus on oppression, verbal violence, and micro-aggressions. We know that building resiliency against hardship is the best weapon against depression and anxiety, yet progressive ideology forces its followers to wallow in feelings of helplessness and victimhood. Instead of empowering women and minorities with self-knowledge, strength of character, and resilience to hardship, progressivism encourages victims to stay in a place of fear and helplessness.”

Women need to be “empowered” by God’s Word, His will, and His Holy Spirit. We need to know Him and let His Word dwell in us richly. This world is only going to grow darker as the end draws near. We must cling to Jesus and fear not what lies ahead. He promises to never leave nor forsake us. Continually renew your minds with Truth and take every thought captive to the obedience of Christ. This it God’s recipe for a joy-filled life!

For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
2 Timothy 2:7

The Social Justice Movement Causes Depression

The Truth About Slavery

Paul Craig Roberts

Support your websitehttps://www.paulcraigroberts.org/pages/donate/ 

Was slavery a wrong or an inherited institution?

Did slavery originate in the English colonies in North America in the 17th century or do its origins go back before the time of recorded history?

Is slavery racist or is it based on economic motive?

If a person wants understanding, these are important questions.

But if a person wants to engage others in emotion for the purpose of gaining preferment and its rewards, money and power, or simply to enjoy the self-righteousness of moral denunciation of one’s fellows, these questions are in the way.  The fact that these questions are never asked and are not a part of black studies programs in universities or the New York Times’ fake history project–the 1619 Project–is conclusive evidence that today slavery is an emotive word used to demonize white people and to bring preferment to black people.

Slavery is presented to American school children as something that white people did to black people.  Therefore, white people are racists and must pay in some way for the slavery of black people that ended in the US 156 years ago.  

There are so many unasked questions.  For example, how did the blacks brought to North America become slaves?  Who enslaved them?  The answer, which explodes the narrative, is that blacks were enslaved by other blacks.  

The main source of slaves for the slave trade was the black Kingdom of Dahomey.  Dahomey engaged in slave wars with other black kingdoms or tribes and became the dominant power.  

As Encyclopedia Britiannica says, “Dahomey was organized for war, not only to expand its boundaries but also to take captives as slaves. Slaves were either sold to the Europeans [or Muslims] in exchange for weapons or kept to work the royal plantations that supplied food for the army and court.” 

The socialist Karl Polanyi wrote the classic work:  Dahomey and the Slave Trade published in 1966. The book does not fit our woke time and the black studies agenda, and it is no longer available in print.  

Today Dahomey is known as Benin.  On the beach at Ouidah there is a contemporary monument, the Gate of no Return, commemorating the lives of the Africans captured by the black Kingdom of Dahomey and sold to Arabs and Europeans as slaves or traded for firearms.

In other words, the origin of black slaves was black slave traders.  

Why did European sea captains bring black slaves to North America?  The answer is that there was fertile land capable of producing profitable crops and no labor force.  Those who held land grants or charters from the English king needed labor to make the land useable.  There was no other work force.  

Slaves were brought to the US not because of racism but for economic motives. Black Africans sold other black Africans to merchants for firearms that established Dahomey’s dominance. The merchants sold the slaves as a labor force to those who held land that originated in land grants or charters from the English monarch and had no one to work it.  Slavery was established as the agricultural labor force long before the United States existed.

This brings us back to the opening question of this essay.  Was slavery a wrong or an inherited institution?  Whether or not something is wrong depends on the morality of the time.  At the time the black Kingdom of Dahomey and the other blacks with whom Dahomey engaged in slave wars did not consider slavery wrong.  Neither did the Arabs who for centuries had raided European coastal towns for white slaves.  Neither did the Europeans who brought the purchased slaves to North America.  Neither did the colonists who purchased a labor force.  Neither did the original slaves, captives who themselves had fought in slave wars.

Slavery had been a fact of life for millenniums. Long before white peoples had black slaves, they had white slaves, and were themselves slaves owned by Arabs.  In the late 18th and early 19th centuries North Americans were enslaved when US merchant ships were captured by North African provinces of the Ottoman Empire.  For some years the US Congress paid large sums to ransome Americans enslaved in Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli.  President Thomas Jefferson tired of it and sent US Naval forces that captured Tripoli and broke up the practice of enslaving captured American merchant ship crews—thus in the US Marines anthem—“to the shores of Tripoli.”

Slavery was everywhere.  It was an inherited institution.  In the African slave wars, a man could begin the battle a free person and if defeated find himself a slave. A person born to slave parents knew no other life. In North America where slaves comprised the agricultural labor force, everyone was born into a society in which slavery was an established institution.  It was the result of a choice made in a distant time when there was no alternative labor force.

The American and French revolutions, as they are called, resulted in an idealism of the free autonomous person, and those affected by this ideal turned on slavery as wrong, as it seems to be under this ideal of Western Civilization.  However, it was not wrong in black Dahomey.

How one disposes of an entire labor institution and replaces it was never described by those who wanted an end to slavery in the 19th century.  Landowners owned the land and the labor.  To require them to free their slaves would be to deprive them of a large part of their capital. If they freed their work force, they would have to hire them back with wages, but after such a capital loss where would the wages come from?  Would taxpayers fund a government program to compensate owners for freeing their slaves?  These are major questions during a time period when many other major questions took precedence.  To reconfigure a country’s established institutions is an extraordinary undertaking.  The Communists attempted it in the 20th century, and did not meet with success.

Mechanization has replaced the bulk of the agricultural work force, but it wasn’t an available alternative at the time.  If it had been, what would have provided the livelihood for the freed slaves? In the end it was sharecropping, which kept the former slaves tied to the land as they had been as slaves and as medieval serfs had been tied to the land.  Instead of wages, sharecroppers shared in the ownership of the crop and the proceeds from the sale.

In the US the heavy immigration would have eventually produced a free labor force except for the fact that until the frontier was closed at the end of the 19th century, immigrants could move west and claim land they occupied.  Most prefered working their own place to working as labor for another person.

Jobs offshoring has eliminated most of the American manufacturing labor force, and those who had manufacturing jobs find themselves today with diminished living standards.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robots are eliminating much of the rest of human employment.  The question of human employment in a world of automation and AI remains an evaded question, just as abolitionists evaded the question of the fate of freed slaves.  President Lincoln wanted to send them back to Africa or to a Central or South American destination.

If slavery was such an evil, why did Congress resurrect slavery with the 16th Amendment in 1909 and the states ratify it in 1913?  To understand what I mean, ask yourself what is the definition of a slave?  A slave is a person who does not own his own labor or the products of his labor. If you are subject to an income tax, you do not own your own labor.

Part of a slave’s work goes to his own maintenance.  Otherwise, if he is not fed, clothed, housed, and his health attended to, his owner loses his labor.  The rest of his labor could be appropriated by his owner to cover the cost of the slave’s purchase and to turn a profit.  For a 19th century slave in the US the tax rate was approximately 50%.  For a medieval serf, the tax rate was lower as he had less technology and therefore was less productive.  A medieval serf could not reproduce if his tax rate exceeded 30%, or such was the view years ago when I studied the medieval economy.  Unlike a slave, a serf was not bought and sold.  He was attached to the land.  Like a slave, he was taxed in terms of his labor.  The lord of the manor had use rights in the serfs’ labor, and the serfs had use rights in the land.

Formerly serfs were free farmers.  After the collapse of Roman power, they had no protection against Viking, Saracen, and Magyar raiders.  To survive they provided labor to a chieftian  who constructed a walled tower and maintained fighting men.  In the event of raids, serfs had a redoubt to which to flee for protection.  In effect, serfs paid a defense tax.  They exchanged a percentage of their labor for protection.  Serfdom became an established institution and continued long after the raids had stopped.  In England serfdom was ended by the Enclosures which stripped serfs of their use rights in land and created a free labor market.

Consider the US income tax.  When President Reagan was elected the tax rate on investment income was 70%.  The top tax rate on wages and salaries was 50%.  In other words, the privileged (mainly white) rich were taxed at the same rate as 19th century black slaves.

How is an American on whose labor the government has a claim a free man?  Clearly, he is not a free man.  We can say that there is a difference between a present day American and a slave, because the government only owns a percentage of his labor and not the person himself–unless the person does not pay his taxes, in which case he can be imprisoned and his labor hired out to private companies who pay the prison for the use of the prisoner’s labor.

The extraordinary failure to ask the relevant questions discussed in this essay has caused a racial division in the US infused with hatred. This hatred is cultivated every day by an irresponsible media, by the Democrat Party, by the universities, by the NY Times 1619 Project, and by the critical race theory taught in public schools. Now that all this hate has been created, how do we get rid of it? With misinformation passing as scholarly fact, how do we recover truth and escape the lies that are destroying us?

The Truth About Slavery

Jeff Berwick — Prepare for Dark Winter Now

dees-mergency.jpeg

Bottom line, you may only have roughly six months to position yourself where you want to be to survive the Zombie apocalypse.
“This coming Dark Winter will be 1984 on steroids.  Likely scenarios will include mandatory vaccines or camps for the unvaxxed, track and trace, and more or less total enslavement, all in the guise to keep us all safe and save lives!”

CDC gives instruction for zombie apocalypse
Disclaimer – This may be fear mongering but I believe that “to be forewarned is to be forearmed.” Pray for the best and prepare for the worst.  I welcome your ideas. (hmakow@gmail.com) Pray Jeff Berwick is wrong. No one wants the vaccinated to suffer. Many of our dear ones have taken the shot. 

URGENT: You May Only Have Six Months Before the Zombie Apocalypse, Great Reset Vax Genocide Begins

by Jeff Berwick
(henrymakow.com)

310x190_professeur-montagnier-juin-2009.jpeg
GATES-LIE.jpeg
dees-cdc.jpeg

If you had six months to prepare how and where to bunker down for the harshest winter of your life, where would you go? What would you put in place?
Luc Montagnier, French virologist did NOT say: “All vaccinated people will die within two years.”
What he actually said, in an interview posted online in mid-May, was that the COVID-19 vaccines have produced the new coronavirus variants and that “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths” thanks to “antibody dependent enhancement,” which creates more severe disease.
The Nobel laureate has called mass vaccination against coronavirus during the pandemic “unthinkable” and a historic blunder that is “creating the variants” and leading to deaths from the disease.
So while he didn’t directly use the words, “There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have been vaccinated already. We must be prepared to incinerate the bodies,” he might have…DECADE OF PLANNING GENOCIDE
Everything points to a decade of dedicated planning — from Operation Dark Winter in 2001, to Kill Gates’ favorite summer reads: “What If” and “How To Lie With Statistics”.
In 2001, “Dark Winter” was the code name for a senior-level bio-terrorist attack simulation conducted on June 22-23, 2001.
It was designed to carry out a mock version of a covert and widespread smallpox attack on the United States. Discussing the outcome of Dark Winter, Bryan Walsh noted “The timing-just a few months before the 9/11 attack-was eerily prescient, as if the organizers had foreseen how the threat of terrorism, including bioterrorism, would come to consume the U.S. government and public in the years to come.”
In 2005, “Atlantic Storm,” organized by the Center for Biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, simulated an international outbreak of a smallpox pandemic (as opposed to the domestic smallpox terrorism attack stipulated by Dark Winter).
“The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028,” conducted in 2017, tested medical responses to the outbreak of a novel coronavirus in St. Paul, Minnesota.
“Clade X,” hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in 2018, proposed a worldwide coronavirus outbreak with no vaccine.
And, in October 2019, two months before the Covaids outbreak, “Event 201” presented an exercise that started with an outbreak of a novel coronavirus (“a high-impact respiratory pathogen pandemic,” as its designers premised) that spread globally.
You see, like any good warmonger, they are meticulous planners and they love games (and computer models).
The shit happens when that computer modelLing bites them in the ass and predicts that come winter, 60-70% of hospitalizations will be those who have been vaccinated twice.
Here are the facts you need to know.
Bottom line, you may only have roughly six months to position yourself where you want to be to survive the Zombie apocalypse.
A friend wrote: “We have maybe 5 or 6 months left of relative freedom, but once the flu season kicks in, the Dark Winter will be upon us and goodbye to any resemblance to a normal and free life. They will use fear, ignorance and hypnotism from the TV and other nefarious gadgets to essentially control and destroy the normies and turn them against the non-normies.
This coming Dark Winter will be 1984 on steroids. Likely scenarios will include mandatory vaccines or camps for the unvaxxed, track and trace, and more or less total enslavement, all in the guise to keep us all safe and save lives!”
You have a few months to get to where you want to be, including investing in private, non-fungible cryptocurrencies or precious metals, or at least starting a survival garden on your balcony.
Like Yogi Berra, former New York Yankees catcher said, “If you don’t know where you are going, you’ll end up somewhere else.”

https://www.henrymakow.com

SCIENCE Soyboy: Japanese Researchers Use Soybean Compound To Turn Male Fish Into Females

A team of researchers in Japan has succeeded in using a compound found in soybeans similar in effect to female hormones to turn male catfish into females.

soyboy japanese researchers use soybean compound to turn male fish into females

“The team, from Kindai University’s Aquaculture Research Institute and based at the institute’s Shingu Station in Shingu, Wakayama Prefecture, used isoflavone — a compound found in soybeans similar in effect to female hormones — to create the all-female groups of catfish. The feat is a Japan first, according to the university,” reports The Mainichi.

The technique is being applied in order to boost production efficiency because females grow quicker to a required shipping weight of around 600 grams.

“Though it has been known that administering female hormone turns male catfish into females, this method is banned for fish for human consumption,” states the report.

“So Ineno came up with the idea of using soybean isoflavone, which is sold commercially as a dietary supplement.”

The report will prompt further questions as to the impact that soy consumption and its potential feminizing effects is having on western populations that are consuming it in larger numbers.

As Conrad Scott notes, soybean oil has also been found to cause serious weight gain and neurological problems in mice.

Consumption of soybean oil also caused dysregulation of the mice’s oxytocin system, leading to suggestions that it could be responsible for disrupting empathy and social bonding in humans.

Scott points to another previous study which documented how long term soy consumption made monkeys both more aggressive in some cases and more submissive in others while leaving them isolated from their fellow primates.https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1399410776469913606&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fhumansarefree.com%2F2021%2F06%2Fresearchers-soybean-turn-male-fish-into-females.html&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

“These results should be cause for alarm for one simple reason: soybean oil is the most widely consumed oil in the United States,” writes Scott.

“Indeed, there has been a 100-fold increase in soybean oil consumption during the 20th century. Soybean oil is everywhere, especially in the processed foods which make up a significant portion, even a majority, of the diets of most people in America and much of the rest of the developed world.”

As we previously highlighted, mainstream media outlets like the New York Times acknowledge that the world is undergoing a “paradigm shift” of rapidly falling fertility rates, but blame the problem entirely on socio-economics and refuse to consider any environmental factors.

Top Epidemiologist: Men Will No Longer Produce Sperm By 2045

In addition to processed foods, plastic pollution could also be contributing to the decline in fertility.

A top environmental scientist recently warned that plastic pollution is shrinking penises and making men infertile, meaning most of them won’t be able to produce sperm by 2045.

“Phathalates mimic the hormone oestrogen and thus disrupt the natural production of hormones in the human body, which researchers have linked to interference in sexual development in infants and behaviours in adults,” reported Sky News.

The chemical, which is used to make plastics more flexible, is being transmitted to humans via toys, food and other items.

Exposure to such chemicals has also worsened as a result of face masks becoming ubiquitous since the start of the COVID pandemic.

Scientists Warn COVID Is Reducing Fertility: Sperm Concentration Reduced By 516%, Mobility By 209% And Cell Shape Altered By 400%

Anti-depressant drug residue which finds its way into the water supply is also making fishcowardly and nervous.

With this toxic cocktail of chemicals only appearing to get worse, it’s no surprise that fertility continues to decline, although the mainstream media is loathe to consider the real causes.

Soyboy: Japanese Researchers Use Soybean Compound to Turn Male Fish Into Females

Global Elite Use 3 Giant Financial Companies To Control 88% Of The Corporations Listed On The S&P 500

Michael Snyder

There is no question that large corporations absolutely dominate our society today. They control what we eat, they control what we watch on television, they own most of the stores that we shop at, they provide the energy that our nation depends upon, and they make almost all of the products that we use.

blackrock, vanguard, state street

© FT montage; Getty Images via FT.com

Tens of millions of Americans make a living by serving these colossal firms, and at this point some of the biggest corporations are larger than many small countries. But of course the corporations aren’t the top of the food chain.

They have owners, and there are 3 giant financial companies that the global elite use to control 88 percent of the corporations that are currently listed on the S&P 500.

The three financial companies that I am talking about are BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street.

According to CNN, those companies have a combined 15 trillion dollars in combined assets under management:

“BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street manage a stunning $15 trillion in combined assets, equivalent to more than three-quarters the size of the US economy.”

But that is actually an old number. I wanted to come up with a newer number, and so I started digging.

According to Wikipedia, BlackRock had $8.67 trillion in assets under management as of January 2021:

“BlackRock, Inc. is an American multinational investment management corporation based in New York City. Founded in 1988, initially as a risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with $8.67 trillion in assets under management as of January 2021.[citation needed][6] BlackRock operates globally with 70 offices in 30 countries and clients in 100 countries.[7]”

Vanguard is nearly as big. According to Wikipedia, Vanguard had $6.2 trillion in assets under management as of January 2021:

“The Vanguard Group, Inc. is an American registered investment advisor based in Malvern, Pennsylvania with about $6.2 trillion in global assets under management, as of January 31, 2020.[5]

It is the largest provider of mutual funds and the second-largest provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the world after BlackRock’s iShares.[6]

In addition to mutual funds and ETFs, Vanguard offers brokerage services, variable and fixed annuities, educational account services, financial planning, asset management, and trust services. Several mutual funds managed by Vanguard are ranked at the top of the list of US mutual funds by assets under management.”[7]

While not as large as the other two, State Street had $3.1 trillion in assets under management as of the first month of this year.

So adding those numbers up, the “big three” had almost 18 trillion dollars in assets under management in January 2021, and that number is almost certainly quite a bit higher by now.

That is a giant pile of money that is almost impossible to imagine.

Sometimes people forget just how much money a trillion dollars is. If you were alive when Jesus was born and you spent a million dollars every single day since then, you still would not have spent a trillion dollars yet.

Collectively, the “big three” represent the largest ownership blocks in 88 percent of the companies that are currently listed on the S&P 500:

“Combined, BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard are the largest owner in 88% of the S&P 500 companies, according to a paper published Tuesday by the American Economic Liberties Project, a group that launched in February taking aim at what it sees as excessive corporate power. For instance, the Big Three hold leading stakes in companies including Apple (AAPL), JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Pfizer (PFE).”

Being the largest owner of a publicly traded company doesn’t mean that you can do whatever you want, but it does give you enormous power.

Also read: Only TWO Companies, Vanguard And BlackRock, Control The Planet While World’s Richest 1% Own 82% Of World’s Wealth

For example, last month BlackRock and Vanguard were instrumental in installing two new members on ExxonMobil’s board of directors:

“BlackRock and Vanguard were among the major shareholders whose votes helped to install two new members on ExxonMobil’s board of directors, dealing the oil giant a major defeat in the election of board members at this year’s annual (virtual) shareholders meeting.

The two fund giants, which together own approximately 14% of ExxonMobil shares, according to reports, supported portions of a dissident slate of board nominees brought by a Engine No. 1, an activist, purpose-driven investment firm that sees ExxonMobil’s response to the global climate crisis as far too weak to help achieve net zero emissions by 2050, putting shareholder value at risk. Engine No. 1 put forth a slate of four nominees, all with experience in the oil and gas or renewable energy industry.”

ExxonMobil did not want these new board members, but now they have been forced to take them.

And these new board members will help to ensure that ExxonMobil becomes more fully aligned with the climate agenda of the global elite.

For those in the global elite, it is much easier to use money and power to enact change through corporate structures than it is through various governmental bodies around the globe.

In fact, many would argue that in 2021 corporations have far more of an impact on our day to day lives than any governmental entities do.

Unfortunately, we can’t do much to alter how those corporations behave because they answer to their owners.

Extremely Important: BlackRock Megacorporation Just Took Over The US Treasury And Federal Reserve.

At this point, one of the reasons why it seems like so many corporations have a similar culture is because so many of them are controlled by the exact same people at the very top.

If you do not conform, you are a lot less likely to be hired by one of these corporations, and if you do get hired you are not likely to rise very far through the ranks.

We need to start talking a lot more about “corporate tyranny”. Because even though governmental entities may still claim to protect “liberties” and “freedoms”, the truth is that those that reject the culture that is being pushed on them by the global elite will be increasingly marginalized on the fringes of society.

America’s founders were very suspicious of all large concentrations of power. Today, wealth and power are more concentrated in our society than ever before, and that is not a good thing.

In fact, this is an existential threat to our way of life, but not that many people are focusing on this.

And don’t expect our politicians in Washington to do anything. They want to keep the campaign donations flowing, and so very few of them are ever interested in confronting the big money interests on Wall Street.

Global Elite Use 3 Giant Financial Companies to Control 88% of the Corporations Listed on the S&P 500

SHARING THE GOSPEL IS NOT PREACHING

My mother-in-law has never preached behind a pulpit, but she’s consistently sharing the Gospel with others. She’s never preached to a group in a church service nor has she preached on a street corner or anywhere else. She is friendly to the people in the stores she shops in. She invites neighbors into her home and shares the Gospel with them. She makes friends with the children in her neighborhood, and teaches them to make things. She loves sharing the Good News of the Gospel with whoever will listen.

My father-in-law was a pastor-missionary. He stood behind the pulpit almost every Sunday and preached to the congregation, as elders are commanded to do by God.

A close friend of mine is like my mother-in-law. She witnesses to those in the grocery store, to waitresses, and to her hair stylist once she has developed a relationship with them. She goes to coffee shops, and starts up conversations with anyone who she sees needs encouragement. She has never stood anywhere and preached. She does teach some women biblical womanhood when they need advice about their marriage or child raising.

If you go through the Gospels, Acts, and the rest of the New Testament, you will notice that only men preached. John the Baptist, Jesus, and His Apostles went around preaching the Good News of the Gospel. The women, we are told, went to go *tell* others about Jesus. They never preached. They are never given the ministry of preaching. For all of you who study the Word, this will be made clear to you.

Here are the 1828 Webster Dictionarydefinitions of preach and teach:

PREACH: To discourse on the gospel way of salvation and exhort to repentance; to discourse on evangelical truths and exhort to a belief of them and acceptance of the terms of salvation. This was the extemporaneous manner of preaching pursued by Christ and his apostles. Matthew 4:10. Acts 10:14.

TEACH: To instruct; to inform; to communicate to another the knowledge of that of which he was before ignorant.

“And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people” (Matthew 4:23) The Bible makes a clear distinction between teaching and preaching. So should we.

Paul wrote this exhortation to Timothy: “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine” (2 Timothy 4:2). “The language of the original here is abrupt and emphatic, written evidently under strong emotion and with intense earnestness. St. Paul charged his friend and successor with awful solemnity, as we have seen, ‘preach,’ or proclaim. loudly and publicly, as a herald would announce the accession of his king.” (Ellicot’s Commentary) “Preach; proclaim like a herald, cry like a common crier in the hearing of a multitude.” (Matthew Poole’s Commentary) Preaching was a ministry given only to men.

Women were a vital ministry in Jesus’ time on earth. They helped him in any way that they could. Whenever Jesus healed a woman, she would get up and immediately serve Him by fixing food for Him. Women tend to elevate preaching over serving. They are both extremely important in the ministry God has given to us.

God doesn’t command older women to preach biblical womanhood to women in Titus 2:3-5. God never commands women to preach anywhere in his Word. No, He commands we *teach* young women, and He gives us specific instructions on what we are to teach. All of the women standing behind pulpits and preaching are in direct rebellion to God’s Word. They are leading many astray.

Christ sent me [the Apostle Paul] not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. 
1 Corinthians 1:17

***Here’s a post written by Elizabeth Prata on What Can Women Do on Stage During Church Services? which I wholeheartedly agree with!

Sharing the Gospel is Not Preaching

SHARING THE GOSPEL IS NOT PREACHING

My mother-in-law has never preached behind a pulpit, but she’s consistently sharing the Gospel with others. She’s never preached to a group in a church service nor has she preached on a street corner or anywhere else. She is friendly to the people in the stores she shops in. She invites neighbors into her home and shares the Gospel with them. She makes friends with the children in her neighborhood, and teaches them to make things. She loves sharing the Good News of the Gospel with whoever will listen.

My father-in-law was a pastor-missionary. He stood behind the pulpit almost every Sunday and preached to the congregation, as elders are commanded to do by God.

A close friend of mine is like my mother-in-law. She witnesses to those in the grocery store, to waitresses, and to her hair stylist once she has developed a relationship with them. She goes to coffee shops, and starts up conversations with anyone who she sees needs encouragement. She has never stood anywhere and preached. She does teach some women biblical womanhood when they need advice about their marriage or child raising.

If you go through the Gospels, Acts, and the rest of the New Testament, you will notice that only men preached. John the Baptist, Jesus, and His Apostles went around preaching the Good News of the Gospel. The women, we are told, went to go *tell* others about Jesus. They never preached. They are never given the ministry of preaching. For all of you who study the Word, this will be made clear to you.

Here are the 1828 Webster Dictionarydefinitions of preach and teach:

PREACH: To discourse on the gospel way of salvation and exhort to repentance; to discourse on evangelical truths and exhort to a belief of them and acceptance of the terms of salvation. This was the extemporaneous manner of preaching pursued by Christ and his apostles. Matthew 4:10. Acts 10:14.

TEACH: To instruct; to inform; to communicate to another the knowledge of that of which he was before ignorant.

“And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people” (Matthew 4:23) The Bible makes a clear distinction between teaching and preaching. So should we.

Paul wrote this exhortation to Timothy: “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine” (2 Timothy 4:2). “The language of the original here is abrupt and emphatic, written evidently under strong emotion and with intense earnestness. St. Paul charged his friend and successor with awful solemnity, as we have seen, ‘preach,’ or proclaim. loudly and publicly, as a herald would announce the accession of his king.” (Ellicot’s Commentary) “Preach; proclaim like a herald, cry like a common crier in the hearing of a multitude.” (Matthew Poole’s Commentary) Preaching was a ministry given only to men.

Women were a vital ministry in Jesus’ time on earth. They helped him in any way that they could. Whenever Jesus healed a woman, she would get up and immediately serve Him by fixing food for Him. Women tend to elevate preaching over serving. They are both extremely important in the ministry God has given to us.

God doesn’t command older women to preach biblical womanhood to women in Titus 2:3-5. God never commands women to preach anywhere in his Word. No, He commands we *teach* young women, and He gives us specific instructions on what we are to teach. All of the women standing behind pulpits and preaching are in direct rebellion to God’s Word. They are leading many astray.

Christ sent me [the Apostle Paul] not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. 
1 Corinthians 1:17

***Here’s a post written by Elizabeth Prata on What Can Women Do on Stage During Church Services? which I wholeheartedly agree with!

Sharing the Gospel is Not Preaching